13-7510TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ZONING Administrator
Barbara Roberti X 128
Zoning Board of Appeals
Secretary
Sue Rose X 122
ZONING
20 M[DDLEBUSH ROAD
WAPP[NGERS FALLS, NY 12590
Phone 845-297-6256
Fax: 845-297-0579
E-Mail srose@townofwappinger.us
February 12, 2014
To: .Joseph Paoloni
Town Clerk
From: Sue Rose, Secretary
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
Re: Greenbaum & Gilhooly's
Appeal No. 13-7510
TOWN SUPERVISOR
Barbara Gutzler
TOWN BOARD
William Beale
Vincent Bettina
Ismay Czarniecki
Michael Kuzicz
Zoning Board of Appeals
Howard Prager, Chairman
Tom Della Corte
AI Casella
Robert Johnston
Peter Galotti
Attached you will find the original Application/Decision & Order for
Greenbaum & Gilhooly's, 1379 Route 9, Wappinger Falls, NY. Tax Grid
No. 6157-02-594684. I would appreciate it if you would file these
documents.
Attachments
cc: Steve Tineklman
Town File
Building File
Jim Horan
Planning Board
David Stolman
Bob Gray
Al Roberts
Dutchess County Planning
G°~CC~C~~MCD
FEB 12'2014
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN CLERK
'. ,
~-9•i4 ~/~Men'r~E~
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
P.O. BoX 324 ~ 20 MIDDLEBUSH ROAD
WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 1 2590
RECEIVED
Zoning Board of Appeals
Office: 845.297.1373 ~ Fax: 845.297.4558
Zoning Enforcement Officer
Office: 845.297.6257
www.townofwappinger.us
•
a~
~ , ~~I ~
~~ ~
Application for an Area Varian e
Appeal # ~ .~ ' ~~~ ~~-
DEC 2 ~ 2013
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF WAPP{NGER
Dated : ,~..~~-'1') l~il~~! G-~I
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK:
_ ... ~ , ,,.,, .. ~ r .-f rrFr X11 ~Fi~icxBs i d i n g a t 2s y -~M W ~G N ~ 12 crA-L~ ,
I(~`)~ "`` `--'""°~ hone hereb a eal
to th Zoning Board of Appeals from the decision/a Iti fo °an area va gan e(s){strator,
dated 2 2.0 ' , ~9e=, and do hereby app y
Premises located at 31 rp;,iS, N ~( 12590
Tax Grid # ~ C~ ~9 ~ 1 S '-~~ ' ~''
Zoning District
1. Record Owner of Property i..JAPf~ir-~,E~ ~~ ~~,Y.
Address J. Pte-" ~ '~" " "' i 2 "1t~
Phone Number`i~-~- `~~ Signature:
Owner Consent: Dated: ~ ~ i% printed:
2. Variance(s) Request:
Variance No. 1 °- ~T ~ eals for a variance(s) of the following
I(We) hereby apply to the Zonin Board of App
requirements of the Zoning Code.
cle, Section, Subsection and Paragraph)
Required: ~.L.. /-~G(L~
Applicant(s) can provide:
Thus requesting:
To allow: 'fl-~ PPP~if~
TO~'~`U22.7BA-AAV (4-U3 Rey-) 1 of4
~.
' ' - Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
Application for an Area Variance
Appeal No,
Variance N o. 2 -- LC~T ~~~Pi"F-I-
I(We) hereby apply to the Zoning B and of Appeals or a variance(s) of the following
requirements of the Zoning Code.~~~~ ~~
.,
(Ind- at Article, Section, Subsection and Paragraph) Nt;~_~c5j pf.~`iTla- #~j .
Required: c~ -~-~,r (~.~M !~~ ~D _PrN ~ ~STl2iL~ -
Applicant(s) can provide: ~L}~i ~'-~ _
Thus requesting: -'
To allow: I'--K~ ('~^ IJ~V~.L~-~Wl~Eri~ r'l ~.- ~.XISi7P1 T:
,.
Variance No.' ! ~ ~ /~
I(We) hereby apply to the Zoni g Board of Appeals for a variance(s) of the following
i
requirements of the Zoning C~od\e.
t~ ~~
(Indicate Article, Se Lion, Subsection and Paragraph)
i
Required: -
Applicant(s) can provide
Thus requesting: _
! To allow:
'• ~~~~~ ~~ u eats for a variance(s) of the following
Variance No.'~
i I(1Ne) hereby app1Y to the Zonin Board of App
requirements of the Zoning Code.
(Indicate Articje, ection, Subsectio and Paragr ph)
I Required: ~ i ~
u
Applicant(s) can provide: ~
Thus requesti g:
j To allow:
Variance No. ~ p~ n~
I(We) hereby ~IY to~~ "'n~ ardTof Appeals for a variance(s) of the following
requirements of the Zoning Code.
(Indicate ArticG
Required: ~- ~
Applicant(s) can provide
Thus reques 'ng:
To allow; ~ _ .~ ^^ ~ ~ ~
n,,Subsectiorrand Paragraph)
~~
~~4~
TO~'022.7.BA-AAV (4-03 Re~~)2 of4
Town of V~Jappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
Application for an Area Variance
Appeal No,
E, How did your need for an area variance(s) come about? Is your difficulty self-created? Please
explain your answer in detail,
F. Is your property unique in the neighborhood that is needs this type of variance? Please explain
your answer in detail.
C E.~ -tT,~,~y'~t, fz l~ T
4. List of attachments (Check applicable information)
(Survey Dated ~' ~ ~i. ,Last Revised U ~ Z~i3. and
Prepared by IN~1
( ) Plot Plan Dated
( ) Photos
~Ec, ~i ,2~~~.
(;~ Drawings Dated ~I~ ~.~~~~~'~~~~~' ~'~~~ ~
(~ Other (please list):
5, Signature and V
Please be ad
cation
that no applicat o can be eemed complete unless signed below,
The applicaryt here
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
~~
tes that II infor tion given is accurate as of the date of application,
~~~~ DATED: 1~'f,G ° ~l~t~.
(Appellant}
DATED:
(If more than one Appellant)
l'O~'~'022."/_BA-AAV (a-0~ Rcv) 3 af4
( ) Letter of Communication which resulted in application to the ZBA.
(e, g,, recommendation from the Planning Board/Zoning DeD ted:
Letter from Dated
Letter from
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
1. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) ( )WILL / (g) WILL NOT PRODUCE AN
iJNDESIR.ABLE CHANGE IN THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
2. ( )YES / (~ NO, SUBSTANTIAL DETRIlvIENT WII~L BE CREATED TO NEARBY
PROPERTIES.
3. THERE ( ) IS (ARE) / (X) IS (ARE) NO OTIiER FEASIBLE METHODS AVAILABLE FOR
YOU TO PURSUE TO ACHIEVE THE BENEFIT YOU SEEK OTHER THAN THE REQUESTED
VARIANCE(S).
4 THE REQUESTED AREA VARIANCE(S) ( ) IS (ARE) / (X) IS (ARE) NOT
SUBSTANTIAL.
5. THE PROPOSED VARIANCE(S) ()WILL / (g) WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE
EFFECT OR IMPACT ON THE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD OR DISTRICT.
6. THE ALLEGED DIFFICULTY ( ) IS / (x) IS NOT SELF-CREATED.
CONCLUSION: THEREFORE, IT WAS DETERMIlVED THE REQUESTED VARIANCE IS
(x) GRANTED ( )DENIED.
CONDITIONS/STIPULATIONS: The following conditions and/or stipulations were adopted
by resolution of the Board as part of the action stated above:
*******SEE ATTACHED*******
( )FINDINGS & FACTS ATTACHED.
DATED: ,T?n»ar~~, ~n14 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK
BY:
(Chairman)
PRINT: ~ w~ ~ ~~~'
The ZBA has voted to grant the following variances:
1. Where as 2 acres are required in an HB zoning district, the applicant is proposing to
develop apre-existing non-conforming undersized lot, the applicant can only provide
1.89 acres, thus requesting a O.llacre variance.
2. Where as 200 feet minimum lot depth is required, the applicant can only provide 149 feet
4 inches, thus requesting a variance of 50 feet 6 inch for the proposed development of a
pre-existing non-conforming under sized lot.
Where as 30 feet from the bank canopy roof, is required for a rear yard setback, the
applicant can only provide 13feet 4 inches, thus requesting a 16 feet 8 inch variance.
4. Where as 75 feet front yard setback is required to a state or county highway, the
applicant can only provide 69 feet 8 inches, for an existing front wall of the existing
building, thus requesting a 5 feet 4 inch setback.
5. Where as 25% is required for landscaping, the applicant can only provide 12%, thus
requesting a 13% variance. (As part of the mitigation that is being proposed, the
applicant will obtain a Use & Occupancy permit from the NYS Department of
Transportation. This will allow for the use of a portion of the NYSDOT right-of--way for
landscaped planting beds. This will reduce the variance required for the minimum
landscaped open space to 4.4 %.)
Dated ~ I ~ ~~, ~
Zoning Board of Appeals
Town of W ppinger, Ne York
By: -;
(C/hairman) ~~
Print I ~ w~~ !" K ~~~~-
TINKELMAN
ARCHITECTURE
T ~A
~ 25 ~'n1Y N'.~(;ti 1.11 N(lAl~ i
I 1'l)I'(illKt~.1:I'till, ^I N' 1't)KK 1
Itsas>a~3-ozoo
Phone 845-473-0200
Fax 845-473-0267
Attachment
Application for an Area Variance -Continuation Sheet
Continuation for Item #2:
Variance No. 3 -Rear Yard
I hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance of the following requirements of the
Zoning Code:
Chapter 240 /Article V- Regulations Applicable to All Districts / 240-21 & 240 Attachment -
4for Nonresidential Districts.
Required: Rear Yard Setback off of Old Route 9 = 30-'-0"
Applicant can provide: Rear Yard Setback off of Old Route 9 = 13'-4"
The edge of the canopy roof is 13'-4" from the property line, extending 16'-8" beyond the
rear yard setback line. The Zoning Code Section 240-21(3) allows the roof to overhang the
setback line by 3'-0". This will result in requiring a variance for the remaining ~'-8" of the
canopy.
While the building is being constructed within the required setback distances, the canopy is
not. This variance would allow the partial construction of adrive-through facility canopy to
protect those conducting necessary transactions in inclement weather.
Variance No. 4 -Minimum Landscaped Open Space
I hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance of the following requirements of the
Zoning Code:
Chapter 240 / 240 Attachment 4 -Schedule of Dimensional Regulations -Nonresidential
Districts.
Required: 25%
Applicant can provide: 12%
The Applicant is requesting a reduction in the minimum landscaped open space to by 13%
in that it can only provide 12% within the lands to be owned by the contract vendee.
As part of the mitigation that is being proposed, the Applicant will obtain a Use & Occupancy
Permit from the New York State Department of Transportation. This will allow for the use a
portion of the NYSDOT right-of-way for landscaped planting beds (see letter, Dec. 10, 2013
from Kathy Busa). This will reduce the variance required for the minimum landscaped open
space to 4.4%. An additional item that is being considered as a mitigation measure, is the
reduction in the size of the parking stalls, as being discussed by the Town Planning Board.
The reduction in size from 10x20 to 9x18 will assist in increasing the landscaped open
space.
3. Reason for Appeal
A) The uses that are proposed for this project are as-of-right as per the current Town Zoning
Laws. The development will cause no change to the character of the neighborhood or
nearby properties due to the various variances that are being requested as part of this Area
P:\TA Jobs\Y1379 NSN Rte 9 Development\Documents\05 -Planning & Zoning\ZBA Documents\Dec20_2013 Variance Continuation
Worksheet.docx
Variance Application. This area along Route 9 is commercially developed, consisting of
retail and commercial businesses and car dealerships. The surrounding sites are also
heavily developed, consisting of large buildings surrounded by parking lots. Landscaping
beds are used around the perimeter of the properties, within the parking lots as landscaped
islands to divide the expansive areas of asphalt and licensed areas to beautify the
appearance of the sites. The project, as it is proposed, will feature architecturally significant
structures that will enhance this area of Route 9. The setbacks of these new and existing
buildings, off of either US Route 9 or off of Old Route 9, are consistent with the other
structures that are found throughout this area. The proposed project has been developed to
reflect most of the requirements of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance and will be a
significant enhancement to the Town of Wappinger commercial corridor along Route 9.
B) One of the issues affecting the development of the property is the current size and depth of
the lot. It is smaller than the minimum lot area allowed for this Zoning District and its depth
is also less than what is required. These two variances are required for any new project that
would occur on this property.
Also, the Applicant has made many alterations to the previously submitted site plans to
reduce the number of variances necessary. The Applicant will be entering to an agreement
with the New York State Department of Transportation in regards to obtaining a Use &
Occupancy Permit. The area of land that will be incorporated as part of this permit exists
between the eastern property line and the western edge of US Route 9. This additional land
will allow installation of landscaping along the eastern edge of the property. With the
approved permit granted by the NYSDOT, the variance required for the landscaped open
space that is currently required will be reduced to a small amount; 4.3%. The intent of this
area is to use it to beautify the area of lawn that currently exists between the project site that
the edge of Route 9.
C) The variances that are being requested are not substantial in nature. As mentioned, two
variances are required because of the limitations that are due to the current site size and
dimensions. The variance being requested for the reduction in the rear yard setback
requirement is not significant in regards to the current zoning regulations. While the bank
building itself meets the setback requirements, it is only a portion of the drive-through
canopy that necessitates this variance of 13'-8". Also, the extension of the canopy into the
rear yard setback does not provide a significant visual impact as well. The canopy structure
is perceived as being transparent. The support columns do not create a physical element
which restricts the view of the bank building beyond.
D) If the variances are granted, there will be no negative physical or environmental impacts on
the neighborhood or the surrounding districts. The area along Route 9 is commercially
developed, consisting of retail and commercial businesses and numerous car dealerships.
The properties to the north and the south of this site are heavily developed and consist of
both large and small buildings surrounded by parking lots. Landscaping beds exist around
the perimeter of the adjacent properties and within the parking lots to beautify the
appearance of these sites. This project that has been submitted reflects these same
characteristics and also includes considerable landscaping along the front of the site and
Route 9.
P:\TA Jobs\Y 1379 NSN Rte 9 Development\Documents\05 -Planning & Zoning\ZBA Documents\Dec20_2013 Variance Continuation
Worksheet.docx
E) The need for three of the variances came about because of the current size and
configuration of the property. The narrow and long configuration of the property prevents
the development of the site without impacting various items established within the bulk
zoning regulations. To accommodate these impacts, we have designed the project to
balance the ordinance requirements with the particular configuration of the site as well as
with the context of the adjacent developments. We feel the Project meets the intent of the
ordinance balanced with the realities that are outlined within this document. The goal of this
effort is to create a strong "sense of place" by designing three compatible structures
including the adaptive reuse of the existing Greenbaum & Gilhooley's structure, the creation
of a free standing bank building that will have a strong presence on the northern portion of
the site and the development of a mixed use structure that will be both architecturally
dynamic while allowing for diverse commercial opportunities, all within a carefully organized,
pedestrian friendly and attractive setting.
F} This property is not unique in the neighborhood. Along this stretch of Route 9, there are
other small non-conforming properties that exist within this zoning district. Many of these
properties are bordered on opposing sides by US Route 9 and Old Route 9 as is this site.
As per the uses that are proposed for the site, they are all "as-of-right" per the zoning
ordinance and are consistent with other developments in this area. We also believe that for
the reasons that have been outlined, that the variances that we are asking for are minor in
nature. Through the granting of the variances, we feel that the effort will be a positive
addition to the both Town of Wappinger and to the surrounding properties.
-End-
P:\TA Jobs\Y1379 NSN Rte 9 Development\Documents\05 -Planning & Zoning\ZBA Documents\Dec20_2013 Variance Continuation
Worksheet.docx
TINKELMAN
ARCHITECTURE
T
25 VATv WA(iNLR ROAD
POUGHKI:L'PSIE. ht~1"Y00.K
(845)473-0200',
Phone 845-473-0200
Fax 845-473-0267
Via Hand Delivery
December 23, 2013 RECEIVED
Mr. Howard Prager -Chairman DEC 2 6 2013
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals PLANNING DEPARTMENT
20 Middlebush Road TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Re: Application for an Area Variance
1379 Route 9, Wappinger Falls
Dear Mr. Prager 8~ Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals
On behalf of the Applicant, NSN 1379 LLC, this ZBA Submission Package is being
submitted to you and your Board to request the necessary variances that are
required for the successful development of this new mixed-use retail, office ~
bank project, as it is currently configured. The list of variances were determined
during a recent meeting with AI Roberts, Barbara Roberti, David Stolman and
myself, as well as subsequent telephone conversations while the project site
plan was being fine-tuned.
Item # 1 - Lot Size
The size of the property is S.S~ smaller than the allowed area
indicated in the Schedule of Dimensional Regulations -
Nonresidential Districts. This is apre-existing condition. This
deficiency will require a variance to allow for any development of
this property. To assist in mitigating this condition, the Client has
currently received preliminary approval for a Use 8~ Occupancy
Permit from the New York State Department of Transportation. With
the granting of this permit, the site would actually be larger than the
required Lot Area. (See Attachment V-O l J
P:\TA Jobs\Y1379 NSN Rte 9 Development\Documents\05 -Planning & Zoning\ZBA Documents\Dec20_2013 Ltr -ZBA
Variances.doc
Item #2 - Lot Depth
The property is located between US Route 9 and Old Route 9; the
depth of the lot, as it currently exists, does not meet the dimension
that is required as per the Schedule of Dimensional Regulations -
Nonresidential Districts. This is apre-existing condition and thus a
variance would be required for any development proposed for the
site. (See Attachment V-01 J. With the Use and Occupancy Permit
in place with the NYSDOT, as previously mentioned, the depth of
the project site would be increased, thus reducing the deficiency
which currently exists providing for a less significant variance.
Item #3 - Rear Yard Setback
The existing rear yard setback off of OId Route 9 requires a
dimension of 30'-0". The bank building itself meets the building
setback requirements. However, the canopy for the drive-through
service window extends into the rear yard setback. The edge of the
canopy roof is 13'-4" from the property line. The Zoning Code
Section 240-21(3J allows the roof to overhan the setback line by 3'~
0". This will result in requiring a variance of l~'-8". Visually, the
canopy will not cause a significant impact to the site. It is a
transparent structure with only the support columns touching the
ground. This allows the bank building itself, which is not in the rear
yard setback, to read as the edge of the structure.
t 7'E~-~~ ~~~~~~~~~
Item #~ Minimum Landscaped Open Space
The project is not able to meeting the minimum landscaped open
space requirement of 2S~ of the property area. As the mitigation
for this shortfall, the Applicant is obtaining a Use & Occupancy
Permit from the New York State Department of Transportation to be
able to use a portion of the land for creating additional
landscaping (see letter, Dec. 10, 2013 from Kathy BusaJ. This assists
in reducing the deficiency in the landscaped open space. A
landscaping plan that was developed for a previous version of the
project is being provided with this submission. It is for informational
purposes. It describes the plants that are being proposed for the
site and it shows the intended landscaping that is to occur wifhin
the NYSDOT land east of the proposed parking lot.
It is our position that Variances # 1 -Lot Size and #2 -Lot Depths should be
considered pre-existing non-conforming conditions, for any redevelopment or
reuse of this property would require these variances. The other two variances
are project specific, and tivhat we fee! are not substantial requests. It is our hope
P:\TA Jobs\Y1379 NSN Rte 9 Development\Documents\05 -Planning & Zoning\ZBA Documents\Dec20_2013 Ltr -ZBA
Variances.doc
that with the details provided herein, plus the value of this undertaking to the
Town of Wappinger, that the granting of these variances will be a logical action.
The following documents are attached to this Town of Wappinger Zoning Board
of Appeal Application:
1 J Variance # 1 ~ #2 -Lot Area ~ Depth Annotative Site Plan (V-01 J
2J Variance #3 -Rear Yard Setback Annotative Site Plan (V-03
3J Application for Area Variance, dated December 20, 2013
4J Updated Project Full Environmental Assessment Form, dated December 9,
2013
SJ Letter to Mr. Robert Valdati -Chairman of the Planning Board, dated
December 9, 2013
6J Letter for the New York State Department of Transportation stating the
approval of the Use and Occupancy Permit, dated December 10, 2013
7J Letter from the Dutchess County Department of Planning ~ Development,
dated August 1, 2013
8J Letter from the Dutchess County Department of Planning ~ Development,
dated August 30, 2013
9J Cover Sheet - PZ-00 l , dated Rev. December 9, 2013.
OJ "As Is" Survey Document, dated October 1, 2013
1 1 J Site Development Plan SP 10 - PZ-04, dated Rev. December 9, 2013
12J Landscape Plari - PZ-O5, dated August 19, 2013
The attached application, the site plan exhibits, respective correspondences
and full size drawings are being provided with this letter to supersede the ZBA
Submission that was provided to you on November 5, 2013. That application
was withdrawn from the meeting agenda to allow for further studies to be
conducted bringing the project more into conformance with the Town of
Wappinger Zoning Code. This new application has been modified and refined
to reduce the previous quantity of variances. Please review the attached
information and documents in preparation for the January 14- 2014 meeting of
the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals. Please do not hesitate to
contact myself or Robert Turner if you have any questions pertaining this
submission or if you are in need of additional information.
Yo s truly, ~/'~
Steve Tinkelman, AIA
Managing Member
P:\TA Jobs\Y1379 NSN Rte 9 Development\Documents\OS -Planning & Zoning\ZBA Documents\Dec20_2013 Ltr -ZBA
Variances.doc
Sue Rose
From: Bob Turner (BTurner@tinkarch.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 9:17 PM
To: Barbara Roberti; Sue Rose
Subject: NSN 1379 / G&G Additional Variance Item ~~c
~ c~,~,F
To: Barbara Roberti -Zoning Administrator ~ ~'
Town of Wappinger towNOF °F~ ~0,~
Ref: NSN 139 LLC / G&G wq pN F~~'
January 7, 2014
At the Planning Board Meeting that was held last night, ilt was brought to our attention the need to amend the current
application that this office has submitted to the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals. There is an additional
variance item that was brought to our attention, which was currently viewed as an existing non-conforming condition.
This variance is in regards to the existing front yard setback for the Greenbaum & Gillhooley Building. The front yard
setback is 69'-8" from the property line to the front wall of the existing building. The Zoning Regulations require a front
yard setback of 75'-0". Being that the current building has a certificate of occupancy for the addition that was added to
the east side of the original structure, it was being looked upon as an item that was "Grandfathered"snd was not
required to meetthe current zoning regulations.
As you had recommended, we should request a front yard variance to address this issue. With the granting of the
variance, this would become a legal non-conforming setback.
Please forward this email to the respective member of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals so that it can be
included with the other four variances that are currently being requested in our application.
Robert E. Turner -Project Architect
Tinkelman Architecture, PLLC
25 Van Warmer Road
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Ph - (845)473-0200 ext 104
Fax - (845)473-0267
Email - rturner~tinkarch.com
i
i
\,
~\
0
J
N
N
U
C
CII
~L
~>
W
_N
~'
0
J
r
U
C
fD
.~
c~
Z
J
W
F-
N
M
~ OI
• .~f >
m
,~
!N
cC ^T
G 8
O.L
~V
~°~
•L ~ n
t ~ ~c)..~
W
V ,_
3 `°'
a~
Z ~o
M
~ ~
~ ~
U etc
J ~ }
M ~
Q
N ~ ~
Z>s
~ ao
N ~
O
a
R
v u~ p
~~ ~ _~ ~
~ ~ ~
~N ~ ~~ ~
~=
a a$
9
~ M
N
(#
q ~ m
i~ ~R k€^_
~z a$R
N
c~ ~^
G `~
0 ~
~ C7
°' ,iS
~~_~
~~~~~~
~~
Zo
v
0
z
m
F
O
y
m
w
O
y
7
1
Y
U
w
Q~
L
L
a~
i
t'')
N
U
C
fB
~L
\~
Z
Q
J
W
H
M
0
U~~
-~ L ~-
J
~Z
M f0 .~
Od ~ 3 O-
N ~ ~
Z ~ t
N ~
O
d
R
U
4 zo
~~ ~ ~~ 2222
U ~ Y
E r i
F u ~ ~
`^ V
FC vS
O
~oWn of ~appinger
20 Middlebush Road
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
Rlanning Department
Office: 845.297.1373 N Fax: 845.297-8579
www, broberti@townofwappinger.us
®~l~~B` ~.®B1~~CD$ ~®1C1i1~
To be filed when the applicant is nat the.6uildino ar property owner
Project # ~~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ Date: ~~`-~-I~~~ _Z-~ , ~ i?j
Grid # 13`~'Co~`~- C~lSr7-02-59~C~~t Zoning District: !/-I~ ~ Si~i~S ,
Location of project:
13~°.t- ~cra.r~°j I~tt~l~ira~ i~~ ~w~ 1`~ `{ l 2 S°c0
Name afApplicant: ~as~:zrLT TtNK-E.t.w-Qt~t_(-~~C.~4~+-tt~r,'~i~~ t'u..G
Print name (Corporation, LLC, Individual, etc.)
Description of project: ~ ~C.~.;~t~_.k.~.t~lt_.. ~ ~~LVlt,r~ ~ll~t~,~ USA. ~~~Le~~?wa~;r
r ~t{~~p~>f,L Li~i'~ ,owner of the above
land/site/building hereby give permission for the Town of Wappinger to approve or deny the above
application in accorda~,ce with local and state codes and ordinances.
Print name { Corporal on, LLC, Tndivlduai
.~``~ lt~a - 26 l~v
Datet
r5 .
etc. } /? /jam
signature
1 ~ - `~ -1 ~ - I ~ ~o . ~ 1 C-4-ElJ f~L.- ~ F-I A~fL~ -- Cl-~~s-t
Owner's Telephone No. ~ Print Name and Title ***
15 ~~.~t2. ~1~Kf~~>z.F~ub N~ 1Z5~0.
Owner's Address
*~~If this is C Corporation or LLC please provide documentation ~of acathority to sign.
If this is a subdivision appllcaYion, please provide a copy of the deed.
TOW033.BD-4CF (7-63 Rev)1 of 1
~ ~'~`l b< w~ T>~{ C!~- ~4 N k! t+-cDC1w ~ 6S-C'i~~t ,
January 9, 2014
Hon. Howard Prager, Chairman
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals Members
20 Middlebush Road
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
Re: Greenbaum and Gilhooley's
Dear Chairman Prager and Members of the Board:
At the January 6th Planning Board meeting the above project was presented by Tinkelman Architecture
Mr. Steve Tinkelman and Mr. Bob Turner discussed with the board the proposed project and the
variances that would be needed to proceed with this project.
At this meeting it was also motioned to draft a Negative Declaration, which will be voted on at the
Planning Board meeting on January 22, 2014. This project will be on your agenda on January 14tH
This letter is to serve as the Planning Board's recommendation that the Zoning Board of Appeals
consider granting the variances required for the above referenced project.
Sincerely,
~~'
Sue Rose
Planning & Zoning Secretary
Cc: Robert Valdati
Barbara Roberti