Castle Point Landfill Post Closure ReportsPAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
845-471-7898
845-471-0905(FAX)
September 10, 2004
Town Board
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Attention: Hon, Joseph Ruggiero, Supervisor
Reference: Castlepoint Recreation Site
Well Test Results
Dear Supervisor Ruggiero & Board members:
This office is in receipt of the second quarter water quality results from the
Castlepoint Landfill as performed by Conrad Geoscience Corp. on June 16th, and
July 19'h, 2004 (copy enclosed).
The results for the supply well that serves the bathroom facilities indicates the
following:
PARAMETER
RESULTS
MCL
• Iron
0.425 ppm
0.300 ppm
• Lead
0.120 ppm
NE
• Zinc
0.305 ppm
5.0 ppm
• Magnesium
35.5 ppm
NE
The iron level is in excess of the New York State Part 5 Drinking Water Code
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). While there is no MCL specifically for lead
(and depending on future lead levels detected) the results may be in excess of NYS
Part 5 Drinking Water Code. The specific language regarding Lead Action Levels in
said code is as follows:
The lead action level is exceeded if the concentration of lead in more than 10 percent
of one liter first draw tap water samples collected during any monitoring period and
computed in accordance with subdivision (c) of this section exceeds 0.015
milligrams per liter.
It should be noted that the samples were taken at the start of the season (i.e. after the
wells had been shut down for winter). This long lapse in use could affect the water
quality results, particularly if the water is not run for a substantial period prior to
sampling.
Joseph E. Paggl Jr., P.E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P.E„ L.S. Charles R. Del Bene, Jr., P.E.
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero - 2 - September 10, 2004
RE: Castlepoint Recreation Site
It is our opinion that the water system for the Castlepoint Recreation Bathroom
facilities should be shut down until this situation can be rectified. This should
include immediate additional testing, and ultimately, could require that some type of
filtration measures be installed.
By copy of this letter, we are notifying Mr. Peter Marlow of the Dutchess County
Health Department, Mr. Michael Tremper of Camo Pollution Control, and Mr. Ralph
Holt of the Town Recreation Department to obtain their input on the matter.
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.
JEP/PJP.law
Enclosure
cc: Hon. Gloria Morse
Town Board: File
Hon. Graham poster
Albert P. Roberts, Esq.
Ralph Holt
Michael Tremper
Peter Marlow, P.E.
Chris Brown, Conrad Geoscience
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3 - Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd, 5th Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
L
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2004, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Gcoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
• fax: 845/454-2655
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the second quarter of
2004 in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual
for the above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
RECEIVE_
On June 16 and July 19, 2004, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site SE 1 14 %
quarterly groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quaTQWN CLEF)"'
parameters as defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells were
sampled and analyzed: PMW-8R, PMW-9. The on-site supply well (SW -1) was tamed off for
the winter months and was not sampled during this quarter.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater from Monitoring Well PMW-8R and PMW-9 was purged until all physical water
quality parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and
PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for
analysis of baseline parameters as defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(4)(6). Samples were
collected from the onsite supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the on-site supply shed.
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-8.R
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: Iron (5.95 ppm);
magnesium (40.1 ppm); sodium (27.7 ppm) and manganese (1.94 ppm). Other inorganic
parameters exceeding NYSDEC standards include color (10,000 pt/cl) and total organic carbon
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
(9.6 ppm). All results are presented in the attached table (analytical report appended). No other
inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC standards. No VOCs were detected in PMW-8R
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron (12.8 ppm); manganese
(0.359 ppm), and copper (0.34 ppm). Other inorganic parameters exceeding NYSDEC standards
include color (250 pt/el). All results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic
parameters exceeded NYSDEC standards. No VOCs were detected in PMW-9
Supply Well
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in the supply well; Iron (0.425 ppm);
lead (0.120 ppm); zinc (0.305 ppm) and magnesium (35.5 ppm). No other inorganic parameters
exceed the NYSDEC standard in the supply well. No VOCs were detected in the supply well.
All results are presented in the attached tables. Analytical reports are appended
In accordance with the State's July 21, 2004 approval letter, the frequency of groundwater
monitoring will be reduced from quarterly to annually. Perimeter Monitoring Wells PMW-8R,
PMW-9 and the on-site supply well will be sampled in the second quarter of 2005, and annually
thereafter.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIEN E CORP.
Eric D..iohnso
Geologist
EDJImf
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski — Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. A�
Ie Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
#CW000100
ast 19, 2004
Groundwater Sampling Results - Inorganic Compounds; collected June 16 and July
19, 2004, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
MW -8R
MW -9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinking
Water
�v
ND<0,010
4
Aluminum
NE
NE
6010
2.50
ND<0.010
Ammonia
20
NE
.350.1
0.37
0.27
0.44
Antimony
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.006
ND<0.006
ND<0.006
Arsenic
0.025
0.05
B010
ND<0.004
ND<0.004
ND<0.004
BOD
NE
NE
405.1
3.0
52
10
Beryllium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.0001
ND<0.0001
ND<0.0001
Boron
1.00
NE
6010
0.050
0.192
0.082
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
70.5
127
80.4
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
ND<10.0
119
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250.00
300
3.31
21.7
10.1
Chromium
0.050
0.10
6010
ND<0.005
0.015
ND<0.005
Color (Pt/CI)
15 Pt/CI
15 Pt/CI
110.2
5
10,000
250
Copper
0.200
NE
6010
0.340
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Hexavalent Chromium
0.050
NE
7196A
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.425
5.95
12.8
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.120
0.006
ND<0.003
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
35.5
40.1
31.7
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.196
1.94
0.354
Mercury
0.002
0.002
6010
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
Nickel
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
ND<0.05
0.08
0.06
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
5.02
8.67
5.33
CONRAD GEosciH VCE CORP.
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
Table 1. (cont'd)
Groundwater Sampling Results — Inorganic Compounds-,. collected June 16
and July 19, 2004, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Fals, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File ##CW00010
I Groundwater standards as established In 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater,
2 - Standards according to 14YSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
units are in rngll unless otherwise stated
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
NYSDEC Limit
Clas GA Drinking
Chemlcal Constituent
Method
Supply Well MW -8R
MW -9
Grounwatert Wates
,.e P
�'
���F�%`� �� ��^.r
�E'a.y..r'..
a,.., .. , .. ^..�� ^" .,..__+s4.'.4. ✓ �"»
d'.: Su�'iS. ���
$
� °'K' M„"�r�.�-�
.�-d�a,..."�'4i
.� ,x.Ea.,� F
45.9 66.3
Sulfate
250
250
300
68.5
Thallium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.005 ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
364 1520
300
Total Cyanide
0.100
NE
335.4
ND<0.01 NDc0.01 .
ND<0.01
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
1601
450
730
490
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
322
481
331
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
351,2
0.96
2.92
077
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
N0<1.0
9.6
ND<1.0
Total Phenolics
0.001
NE
420,2
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
Zinc
0.300
5.0
6010
0.305
0.019
0.011
Selenium
10
0.01
5010
ND<0,005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Silver
0.050
0.05
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
19.6
27.7
19.6
Notes
I Groundwater standards as established In 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater,
2 - Standards according to 14YSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
units are in rngll unless otherwise stated
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. wwwconradzearom
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax; 8451454-2655
August 19, 2004 RECEIVED
Andrew Lent AUG 2 3 2004
NYSDEC Region 3 - Division of Solid Waste TOWN CLERK
200 White Plains Rd. 5th Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2004, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the second quarter of
2004 in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual
for the above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On June 16 and July 19, 2004, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct
quarterly groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality
parameters as defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells were
sampled and analyzed- PMW-8R, PMW-9. The on-site supply well (SW -1) was turned off for
the winter months and was not sampled during this quarter.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater from Monitoring Well PMW-8R and PMW-9 was purged until all physical water
quality parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and
PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for
analysis of baseline parameters as defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Samples were
collected from the onsite supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the on-site supply shed.
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-SR
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: iron (5.95 ppm);
magnesium (40.1 ppm); sodium (27.7 ppm) and manganese (1.94 ppm). Other inorganic
parameters exceeding NYSDEC standards include color (10,000 pticl) and total organic carbon
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
(9.6 ppm). All results are presented in the attached table (analytical report appended). No other
inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC standards. No VOCs were detected in PMW-8R
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron (12.8 ppm); manganese
(0.359 ppm), and copper (0.34 ppm). Other inorganic parameters exceeding NYSDEC standards
include color (250 pt/cl). All results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic
parameters exceeded NYSDEC standards. No VOCs were detected in PMW-9
Supply Well
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in the supply well; Iron (0.425 ppm);
lead (0.120 ppm); zinc (0.305 ppm) and magnesium (35.5 ppm). No other inorganic parameters
exceed the NYSDEC standard in the supply well. No VOCs were detected in the supply well.
All results are presented in the attached tables. Analytical reports are appended
In accordance with the State's July 21, 2004 approval letter, the frequency of groundwater
monitoring will be reduced from quarterly to annually. Perimeter Monitoring Wells PMW-8R,
PMW-9 and the on-site supply well will be sampled in the second quarter of 2005, and annually
thereafter.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIEN E CORP.
Eric D. Johnso
Geologist
EDJ/mf
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski — Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD GFOSOIFNCF CORP. [a
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results - Inorganic Compounds; collected June 16 and July
19, 2004, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Weil
MW -8R
MW -9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinking
Water
�.__
2.50
..�---
Aluminum
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
0.37
0.27
0.44
Antimony
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.006
ND<0.006
ND<0.006
Arsenic
0.025
0.05
6010
ND<0.004
ND<0.004
ND<0.004
BOD
NE
NE
405.1
3.0
52
10
Beryllium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.0001
ND<0.0001
ND<0.0001
Boron
1.00
NE
6010
0.050
0.192
0.082
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
70.5
127
80.4
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
ND<10.0
119
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250.00
300
3.31
21.7
10.1
Chromium
0.050
0.10
6010
ND<0.005
0.015
ND<0.005
Color (Pt/CI)
15 Pt/CI
15 Pt/Cl
110.2
5
10,000
250
Copper
0.200
NE
$Q10
0.340
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Hexavalent Chromium
0.050
NE
7196A
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.425
5.95
12.8
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.120
0.006
ND<0.003
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
35.5
40.1
31.7
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.196
1.94
0.359
Mercury
0.002
0.002
6010
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
Nickel
NE
NE
6010
ND<U05
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
ND<0.05
0.08
0.06
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
5.02
8.67
5.33
CONRAD GEOSCIE.NCE CORP.
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #>iCWOOO100
August 19, 2004
Table 1. (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results — Inorganic Compounds; collected June 16
and July 19, 2004, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constltuent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
MW -8R
MW -9
Clas GA
Groungwatert
Dunking
Water'
w �.Ur�� r' �" ,�`�
�mmm �-mow: • ~ �=v�
� -
_ � ,,».� � � -.«� . :-�' --M.w
m ��W. �:
Sulrate
250
250
300
45.9
66.3
68.5
Thallium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
3101
364
1520
300
Total Cyanide
0.100
NE
335.4
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
450
730
490
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
322
481
331
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
351.2
0.96
2.92
0.77
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
ND<1.0
9.6
ND<1.0
Total Phenolics
0.001
NE
420.2
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
Zinc
0.300
5.0
6010
0.305
0.019
0.019
Selenium
10
0.01
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Silver
0.050
0.05
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0,005
ND<0.005
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
19.6
27.7
19.6
1- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for lass GA groundwater,
2 - Standards according to NYSOOH Subpart 5-1
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards,
Units are In mgll unless otherwise stated
CiONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Al
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
Table 2 Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA Method
8260; collected June 16 and July 19, 2004, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
New York; Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC
Limit
Supply Well
MW -$R MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
20
ND<10.0
ND<10.0
ND<10.0
Benzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.o
ND<1.0
Bromochloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromodichloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromoform
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
2-Butanone (MEK)
10
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
ND<.5.0
Carbon Tetrachloride
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
Chloroform
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Dibromochloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dibromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Dibromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 4 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1-Dichloroethane
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
cis -1, 3-Dichloropropene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Ethylbenzene
6
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
CONRAD GEOSCIFNCE CORP, rift
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
Table 2 (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA
Method 8260; collected June 16 and July 19, 2004, Castle Point Landfill,
Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC
Limit
Supply Well
MW -8R
MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Methylene Chloride
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1,o
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK)
10
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
Styrene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
11 11 1, 2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Tetrachloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Toluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 2-Trichloroothane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
Trichloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Trichlorofluoromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2, 3-Trichioropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Vinyl Chforide2
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
m * p -Xylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
o -Xylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,1-Dichloroethylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,1-Dichloropropytene
5
N0<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
50
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzerne
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3,5-Trimeth)4benzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3-Dichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
CONRAD GEosciF.NCE CORP.
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
Table 2 (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA
Method 8260; collected June 16 and July 19, 2004, Castle Point Landfill,
Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent NYSDEC
Limit
Supply Well MW -8R
MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Dichlorodifluoromethane
5
ND<i.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Isopropylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Napthalene
10
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
n-Butylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
n-Propylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
p-Isopropyttoluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
sec-Butylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
tert-Butylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND0.0
2-Hexanone
NE
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
4-Chlorotoluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
Bromobenzene
5
ND<1,0
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
1-Chlorohexane
50
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
N0<1.0
2,2-Dichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND0.0
2-Chlorotoluene
u..re
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Groundwater standards as established in ONYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater,
2 - Drinking water standard established in NYSDOH Subpart 5.1,
NE=Not Established
Boldface type Indicales those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are In ugA unless otherwise stated
CONRAD GEOSCIENCB CORP,
-
/
/
/
~
/
/
/
/
/
/
'
/
/
/
rrclCONRAD
GEoSCIENCR
N
Figure SITE LOCAMN MAP
Prepared By., Nss
RevIewed By., CBS 3101 C0500 POIrlt Landfill
n
f�
W
.3 �.
c}
+�t nos avoa a3nIa
V
44
.44
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, No.
--Jill 110111= C'm
�L_ 2 9 2004
EL,
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Eric Johnson
Report Date: 7/27/2004
Be: Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 04070516
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No. 10654 Mass, License No. M-CT106 Rhode Island License No, 93 N7 License No. CT401
`he,c ne a
120 RESEARCH DRIVE STRATFORD, CT 136615
Pagel of 4
(203) 325-1:371 FAx (2133) 357-0166
Report Date: 7/27/2004
Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 04070516
ConradGeoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Eric Johnson
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 07120104. The project was identifed as your project "CW000100 11,
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables.
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the methpd and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
MW -8R
York Sample ID
04070516-01
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method Units Results
MDL
Volatiles -8260 list
SW846-8260 u L ---
-_1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroediane
Not detected
1
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Not detected
I
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Not detected
1
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
Not detected
1
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
Not detected
I
1,1-Dichloroeth lene
Not detected
1
1,1-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
1
1.,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
I
1,2,3-Trichlor2ro ane
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trimeth lbenzcne
Not detected
I
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
Not detected
1
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
Not detected
I
Page 2 of 4
Client Sample ID
MW-8R
York Sample ID
04070516-01
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method Units Results
MDL
1,2-Dichloroeth lene (Total
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
I
1,3,5-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,3-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
I
1-Chlorohexane
Not detected
1
2,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
I
2-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
4-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
I
Benzene
Not detected
1
Bromobenzene
Not detected
l
Bromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Bromodichloromethane
Not detected
I
Bromoform
Not detected
I
Bromomethane
Not detected
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Not detected
1
Chlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Chloroethane
Not detected
1
Chloroform
Not detected
1
Chloromethane
Not detected
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
I
Dibromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Dibromomethane
Not detected
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Not detected
I
Eth lbenzene
Not detected
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Not detected
1
Isopropylbenzene
Not detected
I
Methylene chloride
Not detected
1
MTBE
Not detected
1
Naphthalene
Not detected
I
n-But lbenzene
Not detected
1
n-Pro lbenzene
Not detected
1
o-X lene
Not detected
1
- & m-X lens
Not detected
1
p-Isopropyltoluene
Not detected
I
sec-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
Styrene
Not detected
1
tent-Bu ]benzene
Not detected
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Not detected
1
Toluene
Not detected
I
trans- l,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
I
Trichloroethylene
I Not detected
i
Trichlorofluoromethane
Not detected
1
Vinyl chloride
Not detected
1
YORK
Page 3 of 4
r
Client Sample ID
MW -8R
York Sample ID
04070516-01
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Ketones, target list
SW846-8260
u /L
___
__-
2-Butanone MEK
Not detected
5.0
2-Hexanone
Not detected
5.0
Acetone
Not detected
10.0
Methyl isobut 1 ketone MIBK
Not detected
5.0
Cyanide, total
EPA 335.2
m /L
Not detected
0.01
C.O.D.
SM 5220 D
m L
119
10.0
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m /L
Not detected
0.05
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
m L
2.92
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m /L
9.6
1.0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: tnglkg = PPM; ug/kg � ppb
Notes for York Project No. 04070516
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein was subcontracted to EAS Laboratory, Watertown, CT.
Approved By:
Robert Q. Br ley
Managing Di tol
Page 4 of 4
Date: 7/27/2004
YORK
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603
Attention: Eric Johnson
Report Date: 6/24/2004
Re: Client Project ID: CW000100/ Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappingers
York Project No.: 04060504
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No, 10854 Mass, License No, M-CTI06 Rhode Island License No. 93 N3 License No. CT401
�ne"Iac
f �..
120 RESEARCH DRIVE STRATFORD, CT 0661 5 (203) 325-1371 FAX (203) 357-0166
Page 1 of 7
Report Date: 6/24/2004
Client Project ID: CW0001001Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappingers
York Project No.: 04060504
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603
Attention: Eric Johnson
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 06117104. The project was identified as your project "CW0001001Castle Point
Landfill -Town of Wappingers."
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
MW -9
MW -8R
York Sample ID
04060504-01
04060504-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL
Results MDL
Volatiles -8260 list SW846-8260
u
1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Not detected
1
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Not detected
1
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Not detected
-i-
1, 1,2-Trichloroedim
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Not detected
1
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
Not detected
1
1,1-Dichloroeth leve
Not detected
1
lj-Dichloropropyllene
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichloro ro ane
Not detected
l
1,2,3-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-13ibromo-3-chloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
Not detected
1
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
Not detected
1
YORK
Page 2 of 7
Client Sample ID
MW-9
MW-811
York Sample ID
04060504-01
04060504-02
Matrix
Parameter Method
WATER
Units Results
MDL
WATER
Results MDL
1,2-Dichloroethlene (Total)
1,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
Not detected
1
1
1,3,5-Trimeth lbenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
Not detected
I
1
1,3-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexanc
Not detected
Not detected
1
1
2,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
2-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
4-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
Benzene
Not detected
1
Bromobenzenc
Bromochloromethane
Not detected
Not detected
l
1
Bromodichloromethane
Not detected
l
Bromoform
Not detected
1
Bromomethane
Not detected
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Not detected
1
Chlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Chloroethane
Not detected
1
Chloroform
Not detected
1
Chloromethane
Not detected
I
cis- 1,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
1
Dibromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Dibromomethane
Not detected
l
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Not detected
1
Eth lbenzene
Not detected
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Iso ro ylbenzene
Not detected
Not detected
I
1
Methylene chloride
Not detected
1
MTBE
Not detected
1
Naphthalene
Not detected
1
n-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
n-Propylbenzene
o-X leve
Not detected
Not detected
1
1
- & m-X lenes
Not detected
1
p-Isopropyttoluene
Not detected
I
sec-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
Styrene
7 Not detected
1
tert-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Not detected
1
Toluene
Not detected
1
trans- 1,3-Dichlor2propylene
Not detected
1
Trichloroeth lent
Not detected
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
Not detected
1
Vin 1 chloride
Not detected
1
Ketones, Woe list SW846-8260
u ---
---
--- ---
2-Butanone MEK
Not detected
5.0
2-Hexanone
Not detected
5.0
Acetone
Not detected
10.0
Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)
Not detected
5.0
YORK
Page 3 of 7
Client Sample ID
Supply Well
York Sample ID
04060504-03
MW-9
WATER
MW-8R
Units Results MDL
York Sample ID
U91L__-
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Not detected 1
04060504-01
Not detected l
04060504-02
Not detected l
Matrix
detected 1
1,1-Dichloroethane
Not detected 1
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Metals, Priority Pollutant List
EPA SW846
m
L
---
-__
---
Antimony
Not detected
0.006
Not detected
0.006
Arsenic
Not detected
0.004
Not detected
0.004
Beryllium
Not detected
0.0001
Not detected
0.0001
Cadmium
Not detected
0.003
Not detected
0.003
Chromium
Not detected
0.005
0.015
0.005
Copper
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Lead
Not detected
0,003
0.006
0.003
Nickel
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Selenium
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Silver
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Thallium
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Zinc
0.011
0.005
0.019
0.005
Aluminum
SW846-6010
rn
L
Not detected
0.010
2.50
0.010
Alkalinity-Total
SM403
MzX
300
2.0
1520
10.0
Boron
SW846-6010
m
L
0.082
0.020
0.192
0.020
B.O.D.(5-da)
EPA 405.1
m
10
1.0
52
1.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m
L
80.4
0.020
127
0.020
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
T9-/L
10.1
0.5
21.7
0.5
Cyanide, total
EPA 335.2
m
Not detected
0.01
Not detected
0.01
C.O.D.
SM 5220 D
m
L
Not detected
10.0
---
---
Color
EPA 110.1
Pt-Co units
250
5
10000
500
Chromium, hexavalent
EPA 218.4
m
L
Not detected
0.01
Not detected
4.01
Iron
SW846-6010
Mi
12.8
0.005
595
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m CaCO3
331
1.0
481
1.0
Mercury
SW846-7470
m
Not detected
0.0002
Not detected
0.0002
Potassium
SW846-6010
m
5.33
0.500
8.67
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
L
31.7
0.020
40.1
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
0.359
0.005
1.94
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m
19.6
0.10
27.7
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m
0.44
0.05
0.27
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
Mi0.06
0.05
0.08
0.05
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m
Not detected
0.05
---
---
Sulfate
EPA 300
L
68.5
0.2
66.3
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
490
0.5
730
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
m
0.77
0.10
---
---
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m
Not detected
1.0
---
Turbidity
EPA 180.1
NTU
101
0
16100
50
Client Sam le ID
Supply Well
York Sample ID
04060504-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results MDL
Volatiles -8260 list SW846-8260
U91L__-
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Not detected 1
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Not detected l
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Not detected l
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneNot
detected 1
1,1-Dichloroethane
Not detected 1
YORK
Page 4 of 7
Client Sample ID
Supply Well
York Sample ID
04060504-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL
I,I-Dichloroeth lene
Not detected
1
I , I -Dichloropropylene
Not detected
I
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
112,3-Trimeth (benzene
Not detected
I
I,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloro ro ane
Not detected
I
1,2-Dibromoethane
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
Not detected
I
1,2-Dichloroeth leve (Total)
Not detected
I
1,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,3,5-Trimeth (benzene
Not detected
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,3-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
l
1-Chlorohexane
Not detected
I
2,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
2-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
4-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
i
Benzene
Not detected
1
Bromobenzene
Not detected
1
Bromochloromethane
Not detected
l
Bromodichloromethane
Not detected
1
Bromoform
Not detected
I
Bromomethane
Not detected
I
Carbon tetrachloride
Not detected
1
Chlorobenzene
Not detected
I
Chloroethane
Not detected
1
Chloroform
Not detected
1
Chloromethane
Not detected
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
I
Dibromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Dibromomethane
Not detected
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Not detected
1
Eth ]benzene
Not detected
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Not detected
1
Isopropylbenzene
Not detected
1
Methylene chloride
Not detected
1
MTBE
Not detected
1
Naphthalene
Not detected
1
n-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
n-Propylbenzene
Not detected
1
o-X lene
Not detected
1
- & m-X lenes
Not detected
1
p-Isopropyltoluene
Not detected
1
sec-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
Stffene
Not detected
1
tert-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
Tetrachloroeth lene
Not detected
1
YORK
Page 5 of 7
Client Sample ID
Supply Well
York Sample ID
04060504-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Toluene
Not detected
1
trans- l,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
1
Trichloroethylene
Not detected
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
Not detected
1
Vinyl chloride
Not detected
1
Ketones, target list
SW846-8260
u /L
---
---
2-Butanone (MEK)
Not detected
5.0
2-Hexanone
Not detected
5.0
Acetone
Not detected
10.0
Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)
Not detected
5.0
Metals, Priority Pollutant List
EPA ,SW846
m L
---
---
Antimony
Not detected
0.006
Arsenic
Not detected
0.004
Beryllium
Not detected
0.0001
Cadmium
Not detected
0.003
Chromium
Not detected
0.005
Copper
0.340
0.005
Lead
0.120
0.003
Nickel
Not detected
0.005
Selenium
Not detected
0.005
Silver
Not detected
0.005
Thallium
Not detected
0.005
Zinc
0.305
0.005
Aluminum
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0.010
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m L
364
2.0
Boron
SW846-6010
T-21
0.050
0.020
B.O.D.(5-da)
EPA 405.1
m L
3.0
1.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
70.5
0.020
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m
3.31
0.5
Cyanide, total
EPA 335.2
m
Not detected
0.01
C.O.D.
SM 5220 D
m
Not detected
10.0
Color
EPA 110.1
Pt -Co units
5
1
Chromium, hexavalent
EPA 218.4
m
Not detected
0.01
Iron
SW846-6010
mi0.425
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
CaCO3
322
1.0
Mercury
SW846-7470
MLNot
detected
0.0002
Potassium
SW846-6010
m
5.02
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
35.5
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
PYL0.196
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
19.6
0.10
Ammonia
EPA3001SW9056
0.37
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 3001SW9056
m L
Not detected
0.05
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
rn
45.9
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
Mi
450
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
0.96
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
Not detected
1.0
Turbidity
EPA 180.1
NTU
1.39
0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids, mg/L = ppm, ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm; ug/kg = ppb
YORK
Page 6 of 7
Report Date: 6/24/2004
Client Project ID: CW000100/Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappingers
York Project No.: 04060504
Notes for York Project No. 04060504
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that the Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Laboratories; Watertown, CT.
Approved By:
Robert Q. Bra
Managing Dh
Page 7 of 7
Date: 6/24/2004
YORK
L -
-
CD)
0 �
( (a)
m
c c
....=
n
�p E
W
C,
cavaLLJ
I
OL
ti
1
�Y
-4--
k.fyl
W
e
o
re
.m
ur
17'
CL
(LS
t?
CL
E
€i3
E
to
4J..
m
ru
lii
rte.!
I-
in Ln
>
jy 0Fic.
-
E
a.
f.7 k--
iY Q X
M lip
...""a
r'r,..
�-]
-.
IAV'
�i
`
0
U
'N
4Y.
..g
o ey
J W a
y]
4 O P7
N
Zi
E
a)
J
J
CU
Q
ww.
b
0-1
a
o.-.�
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. _ wwwconradgeo.com
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454.2544 • fax: 845/454.2655
August 19, 2004
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3 - Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd., 5th Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
Re: Gas Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2004; Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger,
Dutchess County, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual.
On June 16, 2004, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (02) from 12 gas vents around the
perimeter of the landfill. Background LEL readings were 0.0%. Measurements were also collected in and
around nearby structures. Sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill
gas monitoring. Measurements were taken within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these
vents if methane was detected inside.
Of the 12 vent locations monitored, 3 locations (GV -7, GV -8 and GV -13) had detectable
concentrations of methane within the gas vent.
LEL readings in the on-site gazebo were 0.0%.
LEL readings in the on-site maintenance building were 0.0%.
Data from all gas monitoring points are presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring for
the third quarter of 2004 has been tentatively scheduled for September. If you have any questions or
comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Eric D. Johnson
Geologist
EDJ/mf
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paggi w/ attachments
Steve Capowski -- Dutchess County DOH
Castle Point Landfill- Town of Wappinger
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
Gas Monitoring Log (cont'd)
GV -16 - above
30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
12:43
GV -16 - inside
30.15
0.0
0,0
20.8
12:43
GV -16 - below
30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
12:43
Building
30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
13:00
GV -17 - above
GV -17 - inside
30.15
30.15
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.7
20.7
12:56
12:56
GV -17 - below
30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
12:56
Gazebo
30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
12:58
COMMENTS
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
CONRAD GEOSCIGNCG' CORP,
E:1cW000IWLANDPILL CAS MONITORING120041CASMONIT2NDQ2004,DOC
Castle Point Landfill - Town of Wappinger
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
August 19, 2004
Gas Monitoring Log
Date: 6/16/2004
Pressure: 30.15 Inches Hg
Project#; CW000100 - 2" d Q 2004 Gas Monitoring
Initials: EDJ
Project Name: Castle Point Landfill -- Wappinger
STATION ID Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 -inside 30.15
0.0
0.0
20 7
12:53
GV -1 - above 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
12:53
GV -1 - below 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
12:53
GV -2 - above 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
12:51
GV -2 - inside 30.15
0.0
OA
20.3
12:51
GV -2 -below 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
12:51
GV -5 - inside 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.5
12:47
GV -6 - inside 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
13:10
GV -7 - above 30.15
Broken
Broken
Broken
Broken
GV -7 - inside 30.15
5.0
OVER
4.6
Broken
GV -8 - inside 30.15
5,0
OVER
17.2
13:05
GV -8 - above 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
13:05
GV -8 - below 30.15
0.2
4
17.9
13:05
GV -11 -above 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
13:15
GV -11 - inside 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
13:15
GV -11 - below 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
12:40
GV -12 - above 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
12:40
GV -12 - inside 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.6
12:40
GV -12 - below 30.15
OA
0.0
20,7
12:53
GV -13 - inside 30.15
0.3
6.0
19.7
12:45
GV -15 - above 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
13:13
GV -15 -inside 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.7
13:13
GV -15 - below 30.15
0.0
0.0
20.8
13:13
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
E;SCWOODIOOVLANOFILL CAS MDNITOR7NC1200410ASMRNIT2N bQ2004,DOC X�
CONRAD
GEOSCIENCE
Figure 1
PreparrdBy: --wss -1m, SITE LOCATION MAP
RIVER --- ROAD
:, 1,9
M
R
Z
4
SOUTH
I }
b
s m
n
V
x
-1
>
� -
3
b
c�
�z
A
r
}
�
M
R
Z
4
SOUTH
CAIN UNK F
1�mC�q\j�p.�
s m
V
x
>
� -
b
c�
�z
A
r
�
C
z
m
M
R
Z
4
EA
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. www,conrad ea.com
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/454-2655
April 15, 2004
RECEIVED
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3 APR 2 2004
Division of Solid Wastes TOWN CLERK
200 White Plains Rd., 5 Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
Re: Gas Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2004; Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger, Dutchess
County, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual.
On March 23, 2004, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (02) from 12 gas vents around the
perimeter of the landfill. Background LEL readings were 1.0%. Measurements were also collected in and
around nearby structures. Sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill
gas monitoring. Measurements were taken within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these
vents if methane was detected inside.
Of the 12 vent locations monitored, all locations had detectable concentrations of methane within the
gas vent.
LEL readings in the on-site gazebo were 2.0%.
The on-site maintenance building was closed for the winter.
Data from all gas monitoring points are presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring for
the second quarter of 2004 has been tentatively scheduled for May. If you have any questions or comments
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CONI G IENCE CORP.
Eric D. Johnson
Geologist
EDJ/mbl
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paggi w/ attachments
Castle Point Landfill - Town of Wappinger
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
April 15, 2004
Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
3/23/2004
Pressure: 30.42 Inches Hg
Project#:
CW000100 - is' Q 2004 Gas Monitoring
Initials: EDJ
Project Name:
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
/.CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 - inside
30.42
0.25
5.00
14.1
12:26
GV -1 - above
30.42
0.05
1.00
20.8
12:26
GV -1 - below
30.42
0.10
2.00
20.8
12:26
GV -2 - above
30.42
0.00
0.00
20.9
12:24
GV -2 - inside
30.42
0.05
1.00
21.1
12:24
GV -2 - below
30.42
0.00
0.00
20.9
12:24
GV -5 - inside
30.42
0.10
2.00
20.8
12:22
GV -6 - inside
30.42
0.05
1.00
20.0
12:50
GV -7 - above
30.42
3.05
61
20.2
12:52
GV -7 - inside
30.42
Broken
Broken
Broken
Broken
GV -8 - inside
30.42
2.15
43
18.6
12:40
GV -8 -above
30.42
0.05
1.00.
20.8
12:40
GV -8 - below
30.42
0.05
1,00
20.8
12:40
GV -11 -above
30.42
0.00
0.00
20.9
12:57
GV -11 - inside
30.42
0.10
2.00
13.3
12:57
GV -11 -below
30.42
0.05
1.00
20.0
12:57
GV -12 - above
30.42
0.05
1.00
20.8
12:15
GV -12 - inside
30.42
0.05
1.00
20.2
12:15
GV -12 - below
30.42
0.05
1.00
20.8
12:15
GV -13 - inside
30.42
0.10
2.00
15.0
12:19
GV -15 -above
30.42
0.00
0.00
20.9
12:54
GV -15 - inside
30.42
0.35
7.0
16.6
12:54
GV -15 -below
30.42
0.05
1.00
20.8
12:54
CONRAD GEOSCIEiJCE CORP.
E:ICW000IOOVLANDFILL GAS MONII'ORING120041GAS MONITlSTQ2004.DOC X�
Castle Point Landfill— Town of Wappinger
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
April 15, 2004
Gas Monitoring Log (cont'd)
GV -16 — above
30.42
0.05
1.00
21.2
12,17
GV -16 — inside
30.42
0.10
2.00
19.5
12:17
GV -16 — below
30.42
0.05
1.00
21.2
12:17
Building
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
GV -17 — above
30.42
0.00
0.00
20.9
12:28
GV -17 — inside
30.42
0.05
1.00
21.2
12:28
GV -17 — below
30.42
0.00
0.00
20.9
12.28
Gazebo
30.42
0.10
2.00
21.3
12:33
COMMENTS
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
MI
UCW000I WLANDViLL OAS MONITORING120(A1GASMONIT I STQ2004.DOC
I
1
1
1
I
c:
CONRAD
rci-cmm I
Fm GEOSCIENCE
LIN CORP.
dRaymandAvanve, PoeghkeepSle,NewYork 12603
Figure 1
Prepared By: NSS "I
Reviewed By; CBS "I
Revised By: BPG Z93
SITE LOCATION MAP
Castle Point Landfill
Wappingers Falls, NY
CW000100
mm
CONRA❑ GE08CIENCE CORP. Www.canrad eo.com
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 8451454-2544 • fax: 8451454-2655
April 15, 2004
Andrew Lent
RECEIVED
APR L 2 j"u'i�4
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste TOWN CLERK
200 White Plains Rd. 5th Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2004, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the first quarter of 2004 in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On March 23, 2004, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells were sampled and
analyzed: PMW-8R, PMW-9. The on-site supply well (SW -1) was turned off for the winter
months and was not sampled during this quarter.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated monitoring wells
(PMW-81?, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated. Groundwater from Monitoring Well PMW-8R
and PMW-9 were purged until all physical water quality parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from
Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical
Laboratories for analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File # CW000100
April 15, 2004
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-8R
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: Iron (1.85 ppm);
magnesium (51.9 ppm); and, manganese (5.31 ppm). Other inorganic parameters exceeding
NYSDEC standards include sodium (34.7 ppm), total hardness (639ppm) total dissolved solids
(708 ppm), and total organic carbon (9.2ppm). All results are presented in the attached table
(analytical report appended). No other inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC standards.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron (9.60 ppm); and,
manganese (0.317 ppm). All results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic
parameters exceeded NYSDEC standards.
Analytical reports are appended. Sampling for the 2"d quarter of 2004 is tentatively
scheduled for April 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Eric D. Johnson
Geologist
EDJ/mbl
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Dan O'Connor - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAn GEosauNCE CORP. FA
Table 1. Groundwater Samples; 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 1s1 Quarter 2004,
samples collected March 23, 2004; Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
PMW-8R
PMW-9
SW -1
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinking
Water'
..e®.
H»»."°2.m m
..
C
em::
m .. m•e..'�w�°".»«=»..»«..,i««'»`:'.:R.'�s.««.s'i2':..«
«°"s...:..,. L.'att
g >1»S»i« .N»»M-'.W.dbp..6M..•».....",.9:. temP�®^.^^ami>m. mR°eM:K.®.
eg-%pa�'
E-,.a.m:H. 2P e«'.� «�•«''.teE-.et:
C mm m m
°!°.^.«»::«»...d.,... 5s:,;a'mb:.' esm...�•_�M
Ammonia
2.0
NE
300
0.71
0.56
NS
B.O..D.
NE
NE
405.1
2,0
3.0
NS
Bromide
NE
NE
300
0.53
ND<0.2
NS
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
NS
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
170
84.5
NS
C.Q.D.
NE
NE
508B
36.7
ND<%0
NS
Chloride
250
250
300
45.5
10.3
NS
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
1.85
9.60
NS
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
ND -e0.005
ND<0.005
N5
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
51.9
31.4
NS
Manganese
0.300
0,300
6010
5.31
0.317
NS
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
0.22
ND<0.05
NS
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
10.8
5.51
NS
Sulfate
250
250
300
49.0
72.6
NS
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
403
680
342
NS
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
708
343
NS
Total Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)
500
NE
3148
639
340
NS
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
SM420A
2.20
1.36
NS
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
5058
9.2
ND<1.0
NS
Total Phenols
0.001
NE
420.112
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
NS
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
34.7
18.2
NS
Nates:
1- Groundwater standards as established In BNYCRR Past 700-705, for class GA groundwater;
2 - Standards according to NYSOOH Subpart 5-1;
NE=Not Established,
Boldface type Indicales those parameters, which exceed NYSl7EC standards;
Units are in mgn unless otherwise stated;
NS= Not sampled.
CONRAD GEosaiENCE CORP, EN
tel! t
I1 t - r '�• 'V r4 pi� F i
4.1 h -50
fr''s' C'hel5e2!
it !�
/
SITE
4aoto`.
V. �•1h41
N,
/f•
l CONRAD
1
n
I V
CEOSCIENC'E
CORP.
0 Raymond Avenue, PoupAkeepsle,Now York 1260.1
Figure 7
SITE LOCATION MAP
Prepared By: NSS "I
Reviewed By: COD "f Castle Potnt Landfill
Revised By: BPG 2/03 Wappingers Falls, NY
Approved By: I CW000100
eo 4
� q � m 1
p >- Lail $ R
t- >s
Q �
0 4 ✓D
Zi 01,
f6 �� _ j aF
b o a
i—
HNr�
Q a7
gg�
NI�
°
In
Fes' .� ,� •> .
�p
v ,
U
3
be
�Q z
nom
Q q VFZ1
fL LD
z
n �
a
4
Y1 p
CL
' U 4
CL
U
47
J
Ki7 U
7
x xF W
ItY
tE
03
�y ��d.li) ��N33 KNIT NfVFYj �'
o
Hinos Oban 83/MV
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
3335pp
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Rich Comarda
Report Date: 4/1/2004
Re: Client Project ID: CW00010
York Project No.: 04030713
CT License No, PH -0723 New York License No. 10854 Mass. License No. M-CT106 Rhode Island License No, 93 NJ License No. CT401
r
w �e ,
1 24 RESEARCH DRIVE STRATFORD, CT 0661 S
Pagel of 3
(203) 325-1371 FAX (203) 357-0166
Report Date: 4/1/2004
Client Project ID: CW00010
York Project No.: 04030713
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Rich Comarda
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 03/24104. The project was identifed as your project "CW00010 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NE=LAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sam le ID
MW -8R
MW -9
York Sam le ID
04030713-01
04030713-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m L
680
2.0
342
2.0
B.O.D. 5 -da
EPA 405.1
m /L
2.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
Bromide
EPA300/SW9056
mg/1
0.53
0.2
Not detected
0.2
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m L
45.5
6.5
10.3
0.5
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m L
0.71
0.05
0.56
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m L
0.22
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Calcium
SW846-6010
m L
170
0,020
84.5
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Iron
SW846-6010
m L
1.85
0.005
9.60
0.005
Potassium
SW846-6010
m L
10.8
0.500
5.51
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m L
519
0.020
31.4
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m
5.31
0.005
0.317
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m L
34.7
0.10
18.2
0.10
Lead
SW846-6010
m L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m /L
36.7
10.0
Not detected
10.0
Hardness, total
SM314B
m IL CaCO3
639
1.0
340
1.0
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
m /L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
YORK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
MW -8R
MW -9
York Sam le ID
04030713-01
04030713-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Sulfate
EPA 300
m IL
49.0
0.2
72.6
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160. I
m /L
708
0.5
343
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
m IL
2.20
0.10
1.36
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m IL
9.2
1.0
Not detected
1.0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mglL = ppm ; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg — ppm ; ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 04030713
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc,
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Labs, Watertown, CT,
Approved By:
Robert Q. Bra
Managing Din
Page 3 of 3
Date: 4/1/2004
YORK
C3C3
7
Pj nI o
EIG�
v 7
o
I I
l
i
0
6
�o
Ll Q
<
z
c
r
`.
m
Q
(,m
w >
J,
ui
r^
' I'
Qtq
a 7
Z
N
j N
LU
r
d
Q l
y
/W
(D
' 1
LLJ
'i
Pj nI o
EIG�
v 7
�m
rY
i j 1 to
o
I I
l
0
6
�o
Ll Q
<
z
�
r
`.
m
Q
(,m
w >
N.00 o M
�m
rY
i j 1 to
❑ Q
I I
l
0
E
�o
Ll Q
<
m
Q
U`
w
w� r
(13
z`N
Qtq
a 7
Z
N
j N
F-
r
�m
rY
i j 1 to
I I
l
E
E
CONRAD GROSCIENCE CORP. _ wwwconradgea cam
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 84514542544 • fax: 845/4542655
November 6, 2003
Andrew Lent
ECEMED
NYSDEC Region 3 [UTC 0 ? 2053,
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd., 5`h Floor
Tarrytown,
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
Re: Gas Monitoring Report, Fourth Quarter 2003; Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger,
Dutchess County, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCMMP).
On October 30, 2003, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen(02)from 12 gas vents around the
perimeter of the landfill. Measurements were also collected in and around nearby structures. Sampling was
conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill gas monitoring. Measurements were taken
within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these vents if methane was detected inside.
• Of the 12 vent locations monitored, three locations (GV -1, GV -7, GV -8) had detectable
concentrations of methane within the gas vent.
+ Only GV -7 had detectable concentrations above 100% of the LEL of methane inside the vent pipe.
+ LEL readings in the on-site gazebo were 0.0%.
+ ' The on-site maintenance building was closed for the winter.
Data from all gas monitoring points are presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring for
the first quarter of 2004 has been tentatively scheduled for February. If you have any questions or comments
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIE E C RP.
Eric D. Johnson
Geologist
EDJ/mbl
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paeei w/ attachments
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
November 6, 2003
Page 2
Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
10/30/2003
Pressure: 30.17 inches Hg
Project#:
CW000100 - 4't' Q 2003 Gas Monitoring
Initials: BPGIEDJ
Project Name:
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 - inside
30.17
2.25
45
15.0
11:40
GV -1 -above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:42
GV -1 -below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:42
GV -2 - above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:39
GV -2 -inside
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.7
11:38
GV -2 - below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:38
GV -5 - inside
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:35
GV -6 - inside
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:54
GV -7 - above
30.17
3.00
60
20.7
12:01
GV -7 - inside
30.17
5.00}
OVER
14.1
12:00
GV -8 - inside
30.17
2.00
40
18.7
11:46
GV -8 - above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:47
GV -8 - below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:47
GV -11 -above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
12:07
GV -11 -- inside
30.17
.0005
0.01
15.1
12:06
GV -11 -below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.8
12:07
GV -12 - above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:28
GV -12 - inside
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:27
GV -12 -- below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:28
GV -13 - inside
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:34
GV -15 - above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
12:03
GV -15 - inside
30.17
.0005
0.01
18.6
12:02
GV -15 -- below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.8
12:03
0CW0001001LANDFILL GAS MONITORING120031GASMONIT4THQ2003.POC
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
November 6, 2003
Page 3
Gas Monitoring Log (cont'd)
GV -16 — above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:31
GV -16 — inside
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:30
GV -16 — below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:31
Building
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
Closed for
winter
GV -17 -- above
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:45
GV -17 — inside
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:44
GV -17 — below
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:45
Gazebo
30.17
0.00
0.00
20.9
11:46
k,UMMtN 15
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
EXWOOOIOOILANDAILL GAS MONITMNW0031GASMONIT4THQ2003,DDC
CONRAD GEoscIENCE CORP. www.conrad ea.com
Environmental. Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/454.2655
November 20, 2003
022 ro
TOWN CLERK
Andrew Lent
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Fourth Quarter 2003, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the fourth quarter of 2003
in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On October 31, 2003, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells were sampled and
analyzed: PMW-8R, PMW-9. The on-site supply well (SW -1) was turned off for the winter
months and was not sampled during this quarter.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater from Monitoring Well PMW-8R and PMW-9 were purged until all physical water
quality parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and
PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for
analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File # CW000100
November 20, 2003
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-SR
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: Iron (2.02 ppm);
magnesium (41.1 ppm); and, manganese (2.26 ppm). Other inorganic parameters exceeding
NYSDEC standards include sodium (22.4 ppm), total hardness (564 ppm), and total dissolved
solids (676 ppm), and total organic carbon (8.Oppm). All results are presented in the attached
table (analytical report appended). No other inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC standards.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceeded NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron (4.67 ppm); and,
manganese (0.227 ppm). All results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic
parameters exceeded NYSDEC standards.
Analytical reports are appended. Sampling for the Vs quarter of 2004 is tentatively
scheduled for January 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIINCE,CORP.�
Eric D. Johnson
Geologist
EDJ/mbl
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Dan O'Connor - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD GEOSCIENC& CORP,
nn a 1
r q ¢ CD
W 9
# mAo
►v�1�1 f .4 e- �
0
r ® -.'IT
a
V
��v m
r7
N �i r5
v a�
a ^�
� u
d p P
o F
w
c� T
0
av ai F i � °' �s
w
Z
r �
a
4
f7 O
�m �CD
4,
Isl
W
S
IL Z r
a x�
a _o m °
33H3i NNf7 NIVFR'l �r `"
�_��..._.._.._.._.•rrr.r...._ • �� _- a rrr.rrur.n_n'.._.._.r..r.,r._r._..ru......�' ����.' _
HIMS OV08 bW8
rA7A-30 CONRAD
LV: CORP.
it RWmondAvenue, Poughkeepsie, Newyork 190 -3 -
Figure I
SITE LOCATION MAP
Prepared By: Nss "I
Reviewed6y.- CBB Y0-1—
Castle Point Landfill
WaPPIngers Falls, NY
Revised By., BPG 2J03
Table 1. Groundwater Samples; 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 4th Quarter 2003,
samples collected October 31, 2003; Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
I- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater;
2 - Standards acoording to NYSOOH Subpart 5-1;
NE=Not Established;
Boldface type Indicates those parameters, which exceed NYSDEC standards;
Units are in mg9 unless otherwise stated;
NS= Not sampled,
NYSDEC Limit
Chemical Constituent
PMW-8R
PMW-9
SW -1
Class GA
Drinkin
Method
Groundwater'
Watey
Routrnq.Parameters .'
Ammonia
2.0
NE
300
0.30
0.53
NS
B.O.D.
NE
NE
405.1
3.0
9.0
NS
Bromide
NE
NE
300
0.31
ND<0.2
NS
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
NS
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
158
93.6
NS
C.O.D.
NE
NE
5086
26.5
11.1
NS
Chloride
250
250
300
29.6
10.2
NS
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
2.02
4.67
NS
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
-
NS
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
41.1
32.3
NS
Manganese
0.300
0.300
6010
2.26
0.227
NS
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
1.70
0,08
NS
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
8.99
4.68
NS
Sulfate
250
250
300
41.1
74.9
NS
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
403
620
600
NS
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
676
480
NS
Total Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)
500
NE
3146
564
367
NS
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
SM420A
1.10
1,26
NS
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
505B
8.0
1.7
NS
Total Phenols
0.001
NE
420.112
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
NS
Sodium
20..0
NE
6010
22.4
17.6
NS
Turbidity (NTL1s)
NE
NE
180.1
52.8
15.4
NS
sv�ra�
I- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater;
2 - Standards acoording to NYSOOH Subpart 5-1;
NE=Not Established;
Boldface type Indicates those parameters, which exceed NYSDEC standards;
Units are in mg9 unless otherwise stated;
NS= Not sampled,
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Eric Johnson
Report Date: 11/7/2003
Re: Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 03110022
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No, 10854 Mass, License No. M-CTI06 Rhode Island License No. 93 NJ License No. CT401
ne
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORD, CT 06906 (203) 325-1371 FAX (203) 357-0166
Pagel of 3
Report Date: 11/7/2003
Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 03110022
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Eric Johnson
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 11103103. The project was identified as your project "CW000100 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables.
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Nates section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
OOI/MW-8R
002/MW-9
York Sample ID
03110022-01
03110022-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m
620
20.0
600
20.0
B.O.D.(5-da)
EPA 405.1
m
3.0
1.0
9.0
1.0
Bromide
EPA300/SW9056
Mg/1
0.31
0.2
Not detected
0.2
Calcium
SW846-6010
m
L
158
0.020
93.6
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m
L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m
L
29.6
0.5
10.2
0.5
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m
L
26.5
10.0
11.1
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
m
L
2.02
0.005
4.67
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m CaCO3
564
1.0
367
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m
L 1
8.99
0.500
4.88
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
L
41.1
0.020
32.3
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m
2.26
0.005
0.227
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m
L
22.4
0.10
17.6
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
mgtL
0.30
0.05
0.53
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m
1.70
0.05
0.08
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m
L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m
L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
YORK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
001/MW-8R
002/MW-9
York Sample ID
03110022-01
03110022-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Sulfate
EPA 300
m L
41.1
0.2
74.9
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m L
676
0.5
480
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
m L
1.10
0.10
1.26
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m L
8.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
Turbidity
EPA 180.1
NTU
52.8
0
15.4
0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L — ppm ; ug1L W ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm ; ug/kg — ppb
Notes for York Project No. 03110022
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that the Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Laboratories; Watertown, CT.
Approved B
Page 3 of 3
Date: 11/7/2003
ffel- ai_ _�
O
CIO
IL
cr
m
0
IQ
as 0
d)
a)
a)
3z
L)
CD
ca
ci
z
Oc
a)
(D
43
F
E
LU(U
x-CL—
0
U)
CL
E
cu
Qi
CD
a)
Lh
[if
ccr
VJ
V7
d
m
0
as
0
L
0
m
U
0
E
M
C/)
Z
oL
_0
>
m
cr
)
0
2! (U
Q)
q�
C/)
vA
4!.
U)
w
co
co
Memo
To: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Solid and Hazardous Materials, Region 3
21 South Putt Comers Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Attention: Ken Grzyb
From: Peter J. Paggi Rrp
CC: Mr. Andrew Lent, NYSDEC - Tarrytown
Mr. Frank Kelly, NYSDEC — New Paltz
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Supervisor
Town Board: File
Hon. Gloria Morse, Town Clerk
Gerald Terwilliger, Town Comptroller
Date: 11/21/03
Re: Castlepoint Landfill Closure Project
Town of Wappinger
Comments:
On this date, I had a telephone conversation with Mr. Andrew Lent of the NYSDEC
regarding the Castlepoint Landfill Closure Project located in the Town of Wappinger.
Mr. Lent directed me to your department. Enclosed please find the following
information:
1. Landfill Closure Certification Report, prepared by Paggi, Martin and Del Bene,
Lip., dated 11/23/98 and updated 11120/03. The Report is signed and sealed by
a New York State Licensed Professional Engineer.
Page 1
o"'I ? S 2.003
TOWN CLERK
2. NYSDEC Landfill Closure Certification Report Checklist, prepared by Paggi,
Martin and Del Bene, Lip. The Checklist is signed and sealed by a New York
State Licensed Professional Engineer.
3. Test Results: Construction Quality Assurance 1 Construction Quality Control
(CQA ICQC), dated 11123198.
4. Final "As- Built" Map, prepared by Paggi, Martin and Del Bene, Lip., dated last
revised 10109100.
This information is submitted in response to a previous correspondence from Mr.
Lent, dated 3123101. In that correspondence, Mr. Lent informed the Town that the
Certification Report for the Landfill was unacceptable, citing that "An unsigned Report
was submitted which was also not certified by an individual licensed to practice
engineering in the State of New York." Apparently, a signed and sealed copy was
never subsequently transmitted to your department, and an approval letter never
issued from your department.
The Town of Wappinger is now seeking to close out the Project, and obtain a
Release of Retainage on their Landfill Closure State Assistance Grant. The Release
of Retainage will require a letter from your department indicating acceptance of the
Landfill Closure Certification Report.
Your assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions or comments
regarding this matter. We would be glad to meet with you, or schedule an onsite
inspection if you feel that would be beneficial.
Thank you.
S:DRAWINGS/PROJECT/DOCUMENTS/rasdepointiandfiu.dee.11.20.03
0 Page 2
PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
845-471-7898
845-471-0905 (FAX)
Revised November 23, 2003
November 23, 1998
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Attention: Frank Kelly
Reference: Landfill Closure Certification Report
Castlepoint Landfill Closure Project
Town. of Wappinger/Dutchess County, New York
Dear Mr. Kelly:
This letter is written to provide the engineering certification of construction in
substantial compliance with the Closure Plan approved by your Department on August
2°d, 1996 as well as Plans and Specifications prepared by this office dated May, 1997.
The letter specifically addresses nine areas of technical compliance as follows:
1. Site Rough Grading
2. Installation of Gas Vents
3. Construction Quality Assurance/Construction Quality Control (CQAICQC)
4. Installation of 18" Clay Barrier Layer
5. Installation of 24" Barrier Protection layer
6. Drainage Swales
7. Extension of Monitoring Wells
8. Installation of Topsoil, Seed and Mulch Layer
9. Additional Cap Area.
1, SITE ROUGH GRADING:
The Contractor performed site rough grading in substantial compliance with
approved plans to assure positive drainage. Slopes were in the 4% (minimum) to
33% (maximum) range. The Contractor's Surveyor performed onsite fieldwork to
verify grades prior to the placement of the clay barrier layer.
Mr. Frank Kelly - 2 - Revised November 23, 2003
RE: Castlepoint Landfill November 23, 1998
2. INSTALLATION OF GAS VENTS:
The Contractor installed sixteen (16) gas vents in accordance with approved plans
and specifications prior to placement of the clay barrier layer.
3. COAICOC:
The Contractor retained the services of Advanced Testing, Inc. to provide testing
services for the project including pre -construction qualification, lab testing and in-
situ testing. All procedures and protocols were in conformance with approved
specifications.
A copy of the test locations and results is enclosed herein for your review and
approval.
4. INSTALLATION OF 18" CLAY BARRIER LAYER:
The Contractor installed the 18" clay barrier in accordance with approved plans and
specifications. The clay was installed in three 6" lifts with each lift being
compacted with a vibratory sheeps foot roller to a minimum 90 percent of the
Standard Proctor density. Grade stakes and the gas vent riser pipes were utilized
for vertical control. In all instances, a minimum of 18" final thickness was
obtained. All pre -construction qualification and insitu compaction and triaxial
permeability tests were in conformance with the approved QA/QC specifications
(see enclosed).
5. INSTALLATION OF 24" BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER:
The Contractor installed the 24" barrier protection layer in accordance with
approved plans and specifications. The material (a mix of sand and gravel) was
installed in three 8" lifts, with each lift being compacted with a vibratory sheeps
foot roller to a minimum of 90 percent of the Standard Proctor density. Grade
stakes and the gas vent riser pipes were utilized for vertical control. In all instances
a minimum of 24" final thickness was obtained. All pre -construction qualification
and insitu compaction tests were in conformance with the approved QA/QC
specifications (see enclosed). .
Mr, Frank Kelly - 3 - Revised November 23, 2003
RE: Castlepoint Landfill November 23, 1998
6. DRAINAGE SWALES:
The Contractor installed the drainage swales designed to divert upgradient surface
water away from the landfill site in substantial conformance with approved plans
and specifications.
7. EXTENSION OF MONITOR WELLS:
The Contractor extended the monitoring wells and protective casings in compliance
with approved plans and specifications,
S. INSTALLATION OF TOPSOIL, SEED AND MULCH LAYER:
The Contractor installed the 6" topsoil, seed and mulch layer in compliance with
approved plans and specifications. The topsoil was installed in one 6" lift. Grade
stakes and the gas vent riser pipes were utilized for vertical control. All pre -
construction qualification testing was in compliance with the approved QA/QC
specifications (see enclosed).
9. ADDITIONAL CAP AREA:
As per our correspondence of June 9a', 1998 and your approval letter of June 12�',
1998, the Contractor extended the landfill cap to cover an additional, unexpected
area of waste located at the northeasterly area of the site. The QA/QC testing for
this area is included in the enclosed test result report. The additional cap area is
also included on the map indicating test locations. In all areas, the minimum clay
layer depth (18") and barrier protection layer depth (24") were maintained,
The barrier protection layer was made up mostly of existing onsite borrow
material. Compaction, testing and vertical control were identical to that detailed
under Items 4 and 5 above.
Please review these materials to see if they meet with your approval.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact
this office.
Mr. Frank Kelly
RE: Castlepoint Landfill
- 4 - Revised November 23 2003
November 23, 1998
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
'JEP:PJP:law
Enclosure
6
PA
r ur
eC,
r
A��FSSS1��s;,f
cc. Hon. Joseph Ruggiero Supervi exti� r„
Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman
Hon. Chris Cosley, Councilman
Hon. Robert Valdati, Councilman
Hon. Gloria Morse
Albert P. Roberts, Esq.
Were there any deviations from the Closure Plan?
If so, attach a description of and the reason the deviation occurred. Yes
Were the quality control and quality assurance testing procedures and
Protocols performed in accordance with the approved Closure Plan Yes
and Part 360-2.8?
PHD .Letter=6/12/8
enclosed
DEC letter enclosed
Te t Resul6
Test Resu4s Sec4on: Tki `
Does the Certification Report contain all the quality control and
Summary in front of each
quality assurance testing results required by the Closure Plan and Part Yes Section Wi h pas /fail
360-2.13 including any failed tests, descriptions of failed material and re—tes data
corrections, and documentation of retesting ?
Does the Certification Report contain a discussion of all the quality
control and quality assurance testing results required by the Closure Yes Test Resul s: Se tion P
Plan and Part 360.2.13?
Is the Certification Report signed and stamped by a Professional
PMD Certif catio Repo t
Engineer licensed to practice engineering in New York State in Yes dated 11/2 /9$ c
accordance with Part 360-1.9(ep pq en losed
Gas Venting Layer
7.13(P)(3)(i) (QC): Does the Certif%cation Report contain
documentation that the material used for the gas
venting layer meets the requirements of N/A
2.13(P)(1)?
2.13(p)(3)(i) (QC): Does the Certification Report contain
documentation that the quality control testing was
performed at a frequency of one test for every N/A
1000 cubic yards of material f6r grain size?
2.13(p)(3)(ii) (QA): Does the Certification Report contain
documentation that the material was placed in
accordance with the approved Closure Plan and N/A
Specifications?
Were the required number of gas vents installed?
(One per acre with a 12" gas venting? layer)
(four per acre with no venting layer) Yes As — Built
P
Barrier Soil Laver
2.13(q)(3) S: (QC): Does the Certification Report contain
31(j)('1)6) documentation that The barrier soil laver meets the
permeabiiityrequirements of2.13(j)(;).the Yes Test Resu is Setions{1,4,5 & 6.
approved Closure Plan and Specifications? i
I.i iiS Cf C1iCC 611.1[
i
�7ccenzper '��{10
2,13(J)(3)(!)
(QC): Does the Certification Report contain
documentation that the quality control testing was
performed at the following frequencies:
a. one soil particle size analysis for every
Yes
2500 cubic yards of material placed?
b. one Atterberg limits analysis for every
1000 cubic yards of material placed?
Yes
c,one tnaxa permea d !ty test for every
5000 cubic yards of material placed?
Yes
d. one moisture content test for every_
cubic yards of material placed?
Yes
C. one moisture- ens!ty-permea ! rty
comparison for every 5000 cubic yards of material
Yes
placed or change in soil?
2,13(j)(3)(d)
(QA): Does the Certification Report contain
documentation that the quality control testing vas
performed at the following frequencies: L
a. nine density tests per acre per lift of
Yes
materia[ laced'
b, nine moisture content tests per acre of
material placed?
Yes
C. one sheiby tube triaxial permeability test
per acre per lift of material placed?
Yes
Geo!membrane Layer
2.13(•)(3)
(QC): Does the Certification Report contain
2.13.(k)(3)(i)(2),
documentation that the geomembrane material and
raw material meet the pre-approved
specifications?
2.13(k)(3)(ii)
(QC): Does the Certification Report contain
(a , (b), (c)
documentation that any geomembrane rolls
fabricated into blankets at the factory meet the
pre-approved specifications?
2.13(k)(3)(iii)
(QA): Does the Certification Report contain
documentation of the non-destructive and
destructive testing in accordance with 360-
Barrier Protection
Laver
j
Does the Certification Report contain
documentation that the Barrier Protection soils
Yes
meet the pre-approved specifications to
accordance with the Closure Plan'?
cr chucl�[,;t
'Test -Results: P4ges; l�, 4A, 5A
Test Resu.ts: P4ges 1*,4A, 5A
Test Results: P49es 4, 4A, 51
Test Resu4ts Pa4es IA.j 4A, 5A
Test Resu4ts Pa4es 1AJ 4A, 511
Test Resuis Pa es 4A# 5B—H, 6A
Test: Results
Test Results Pa
s 4AJ 5B—H, 6A
1A14A151,6A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Test Resu]ts Sec�tionsl6, 7 & 8
December 2WO
I hereby certify that the afore cited provisions of 6NYCRR Part 360 have been
reviewed by me and have been addressed to t the facility was closed in
compliance with 6NYCRR Part 360 closure
FIAQ
WV
Aure and Stamp
y 055674
Professional Engineer Registration Number
Deet im,« 2000
3 & 9
ly
s or
PAGGI 8r. MARTIN
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
914-471-7898
914-471-0905 (FAX
HAND DELIVERED.
June 9, 1998
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
21 South Putts Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Attention: Frank Kelly
Reference: Castlepoint Landfill Closure
Dear Mr. Kelly:
As you are aware, Hudson Canyon Construction, Inc, has been working on the above referenced project
for the last month. In general, the work has progressed smoothly and site inspections by this office have
proved to be favorable.
As outline in our previous correspondence dated May l la`, 1998, this office has identified two areas at
the site that contain waste material and that are located outside of the originally presumed landfill
boundary. Because these areas are outside of the Contract boundaries, any remedial work in the area
would constitute an addition to the Contract and would require a Change Order.
The areas in questions are illustrated on the enclosed plan, and are more particularly described as
follows:
A. Area "A" is located at the northwesterly section of the landfill, along the westerly edge of the
existing entry road. The additional waste in this area was encountered on May 5h, 1998 during
construction operations to relocate the entry road as per the Contract Specifications. In order to
remedy the situation, this office instructed the Contractor to excavate the additional ,waste,
relocate it to the main landfill mass, cover the waster with clean fill, and compact the entire
area. The excavation was then backfilled with 1'/z" crushed stone, covered with clean,
compacted fill. The excavation measured 30 feet long by 24 feet wide by 6 feet deep,
B. Area "B" is located at the northerly section of the landfill along the entry road up to the existing
ballfidd fence. This area exhibited leachate bubbling up to the surface during a routine
N.Y.S.D.E.C. inspection. Further exploration work conducted on May 8a', 1998 revealed that
additional waste materials were present in the area indicated on the enclosed plan.
This office has studied two methods of dealing with this extra waste:
• The first method would be to excavate the additional waste, relocate it to the main landfill mass,
cover it and compact it, The remaining excavation would then be backfilled with clean compacted
fill. Any leachate encountered wouid have to be pumped out and hauled to an approved disposai
location.
• The second method would be to leave the additional waste in place, cap it with 18" of clay, 24" of
existing, onsite clean material, and topsoil, seed and mulch the entire area.
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. Ernst Martin, Jr„ P.E., L.S. prrnred on recycled paper
Mr. Frank Kelly - 2 - June 9, 1998
RE: Castlepoint Landfill
Because of the risks inherent to the first method (i,e.: Do not know the vertical extents of the waste, do
not know the magnitude of the leachate) and due to the fact that it would involve substantial amounts of
direct content with waste materials, it is the opinion of this office that the second method (capping) will
provide a much more manageable and environmentally sound methods of dealing with the situation.
Additionally, the second method encompasses many more known quantities than the first, and could
provide a substantial cost savings to the Town.
The Wappinger Town Board has authorized this firm to seek approval from your Department to perform
Option #2 (i.e. in place capping of the additional area). The Contractor is close to finishing the clay cap
as originally delineated, and would like to begin work on the additional area as soon as possible (i,e. by
the week of June 15'h — 19e1).
As such your prompt response would be greatly appreciated
Any questions or comments may be addressed to this office.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours, f
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E.
.TEP: PJP:Iaw
cc: Hon. Constance O. Smith, Supervisor
Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Pooloni, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman
Hon. Robert Vaidati, Councilman
Elaine Snowden
Albert P. Roberts, Esq.
5"�. :tom: = FJ; .W.?'?' Crc.= rli lam' , IF: -'t L T 7 91:4_��
New Fork State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Solid and Hazardous Materials, Region 3
21. South Putt Corners Road, New Paltz, NY 12561-1696
(514) 256-3131 FAX (914) 255-3414
June 12, 1998
MS, CONSTANCE SMITH, SUPERVISOR
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
P.U. BOX 324
WAPPINGERS FALLS, NtW YORK 12590
Re; Castlepoint Landfill Ciosure
Re. June 9, 1998 Paggi & Martin Letter
Dear Ms. Srnith:
Ti]:1 s �1 1 0'3:7i.-1F;:r' -:t;,
v
.r��hn Can+u
Cor.�nilwlon er
This letter is provided in respoalse to the June 9, 1998 letter submitted by Paggi & Martin r:, behalf o1A
the Town Of Wappinger Falls for the Cmdepoint landfill closure, The Department hereby approy%-s of
the secotld melih d of remediation as described in the letter and in conversation with Mr-. Peter Paggi.
The on -situ ci an material w.ay he jtsed For the barrier protection layer provided the n%3terial qi-ialtnes
under the al?pri. ved .spccifications. The Department requests that tliese atw areas he � l on the
final Celt ificat.ion Report Plar_y.
Shold-+ you have any g4e4tiuns or comments, feel free to contact me at (914) ?56-3131,
enclamIrc:
cc. P. Paggi (Paggi & Martin)
0a%(1C)dFp 1. NL
Sincerely,
Frank 1. Belly
Environmencal Engineer I
most -it" Fax Note 767 t
iG'its, r 4-1 _
r•tt�FiN�..,..�
f { 3 i
Fax �f
c
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. www-canradeo.com
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/4542655
August 27, 2003
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd., 5th Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
Re: Gas Monitoring Report, Third Quarter 2003; Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger, Dutchess
County, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCMMP).
On August 7, 2003, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (C114),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (OZ) from 12 gas vents around the
perimeter of the landfill. Measurements were also collected in and around nearby structures. Sampling was
conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill gas monitoring. Measurements were taken
within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these vents if methane was detected inside.
Of the 12 vent Iocations monitored, four locations (GV -1, GV -2, GV -7, GV -8) had detectable
concentrations of methane within the gas vent.
GV -7 had detectable concentrations of methane above the vent pipe (above 100% LEL),
LEL readings in the on-site building and gazebo were 0.0%.
Data from all gas monitoring points are presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring for
the fourth quarter of 2003 has been tentatively scheduled for November. If you have any questions or
continents please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CONRAP,7GEOSCIENCE CORP.
�v�
Christopher B. Brown, CPG -foWN C)LEA
Hydrogeologist
CBB/mbl
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paggi w/ attachments
V
x
A
Q)
I l� - ,� �c��� ;fif ' � til �}� r� � � ;����;
R"se ton
&,k4
N
WZ��,
A
I
A
U I ,I m
1-1�--- .
i U f
Jq(
71
SITE
ff
41�1
P
"N
Filing f N�
V -
ell
V
jF
CONRAD
GEOSCIENCE
CORP.
#RarnondAvenue, PoughkaeWe, New York 12603
Figure 1 SITE LOCATION MAP
Prepared By. NSS M
RavlewedBy: Cas 3/01 Castle Point Landfill
Revised By: sPG 2103 Wappingers Falls, NY
Approved By. CW000100
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
August 18, 2003
Page 2
Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
8/7/2003
Pressure: 29.89 Inches Hg
Project#:
CW000100 -- 3rd Q 2003 Gas Monitoring
Initials: RBC
Project Name:
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
_
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 - inside
29.89
5.0+
OVER
4.5
1032
GV -1 -above
29.89
0.0
000
20.5
1033
GV -1 - below
29.89
0.1
002
20.2
1032
GV -2 - above
29.89
0.0
000
20.5
1029
GV -2 - inside
29.89
5.0+
OVER
9.9
1029
GV -2 -- below
29.89
0.1
002
20.2
1029
GV -5 - inside
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1025
GV -6 -- inside
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1043
GV -7 - above
29.89
5,0+
OVER
0.9
1045
GV -7 - inside
29.89
0.8
016
18.9
1045
GV -8 - inside
29.89
5,0+
OVER
17.5
1038
GV -8 - above
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1038
GV -8 - below
29.89
0.1
002
20.5
1038
GV -11 -above
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1018
GV -11 - inside
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1017
GV -11 - below
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1017
GV -12 - above
29.89
0,0
000
20.9
1020
GV -12 - inside
29.89
0.0
000
20.5
1019
GV -12 - below
29.89
0.0
000
20.9
1020
GV -13 -inside
29.89
0.0
000
20.8
1024
GV -15 - above
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1047
GV -15 - inside
0.0
000
20.7
1047
GV -15 -- below
0.0
000-T
20.7
1047
C NMY DOCUMENTSICONRAD G£OSCIENCEICWOOOIOOILANDFILL GAS MONITORING520031GASMONIT3RDQ2003.DOC
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
August 18, 2003
Page 3
Gas Monitoring Log (cont'd)
GV -16 — above
29.89
0.0
000
20.9
1022
GV -16 — inside
29.89
0.0
000
20.9
1022
GV -16 — below
29.89
0.0
000
20.9
1022
Building
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1042
GV -17 — above
29.89
0.0
000
20.7
1036
GV -17 — inside
29.89
0.5
001
19.3
1035
GV -17 — below
Gazebo
29.89
29.89
OA
0.0
000
000
20.5
20.7
1035
1041
k�%JIVI IYICIV 1 O
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
C:1MY DOCUMENTSICONRAD GEOSCIENCE1CWOOOI OMLANDAILL GAS MONITOR[NG120031GASMONIT3RDQ2003.DOC
CONRAD GROSCIENCE CORP. www.conradieo.com
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/4542544 a fax: 845/454.2655
August 27, 2003 RECEIVED
AUG 2 9 2003
TOWN CLERK
Andrew Lent
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Third Quarter 2003, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CWOOO100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the third quarter of 2003
in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On August 7, 2003, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and a supply well were
sampled and analyzed: PMW-8R, PMW-9, and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater from Monitoring Well PMW-8R and PMW-9 were purged until all physical water
quality parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and
PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for
analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Monitoring
File ## CW000100
August 27, 2003
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-8R
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: Iron (49.5 ppm), lead
(0.071 ppm), magnesium (72.1 ppm) and manganese (8.96 ppm). Other inorganic parameters
exceeding NYSDEC standards include sodium (36.4 ppm), total hardness (1250 ppm), and total
dissolved solids (607 ppm), and total organic carbon (8.Oppm). All results are presented in the
attached table (analytical report appended). No other inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC
standards.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron (9.17 ppm) and
manganese (0.309 ppm). All results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic
parameters exceed NYSDEC standards.
Supply Well SW -1
The following metals exceed NYSDOH standards in SW -1: Iron (0.607 ppm).
Analytical reports are appended. Sampling for the 4th quarter of 2003 is tentatively
scheduled for November 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call..
Sincerely,
CO,7D GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown, CPG
Hydrogeologist
CBB/mbl
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Dan O'Connor - Dutchess County DOH
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
�,F of N
.' Nee',Y'j"
�:. N1.o
/ s ��ytron
i
r
1
Piiing , f;�A
�,F of N
.' Nee',Y'j"
�:. N1.o
/ s ��ytron
i
r
I S JLU
o ■s 1
0 a m Z
a a F, $
3 } �n 103
aha °
z If �C
az
o � Nlbyp 1
~ o
rx
OOy t�
C4 ? two �
C7
F
w C r
N
U Off-
♦ •U
z
r
v
0.
6
M ] C7 4
EWb7 CJ
W
z �
CL
EL
J
m
a �
a
4
x � � Ld U
F
NfVF{O H
i'dSl} �N3i 71NIi
a �
Hi -nos ados aJ nIN
Table 1. Groundwater Samples; 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 3rd Quarter 2003,
samples collected August 7, 2003; Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
PMW-8R
PMW-9
sW-1
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinkin
Wate
Rayfint; Paiarrreters
Ammonia
2.0
NE
300
0.64
0.46
0.08
B.O.D.
NE
NE
405.1
10
4.0
3.0
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
381
86.4
67.8
C.O.D.
NE
NE
5088
150
ND<10.0
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250
300
61.8
10.9
3.36
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
49.5
9.17
0.607
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.071
ND<0.005
0.067
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
72.1
31.1
33.4
Manganese
Nitrate
0.300
10,0
0.3
10.0
6010
300
8.96
0.34
0.309
ND<0.05
0.240
ND<0.05
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
12.5
4.65
4.62
Sulfate
250
250
300
77.1
104
63.3
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
403
792
700
340
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
607
431
395
Total Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)
500
NE
314B
1250
344
307
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
SM420A
1.93
1.38
1.06
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
5056
8.0
ND<1.0
1.1
Total Phenols
0.001
NE
420.112
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
36.4
18.3
26.7
Turbidity (NTUs)
NE
NE
180,1
1120
74
2.93
1- Groundwater standards as established in BNYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater,
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1;
NE=Not Established;
Boldface type indicates those parameters, which exceed NYSDEC standards;
Units are in mO unless otherwise stated;
NS= Not sampled,
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10966
Attention: Rich Comarda
Report Date: 8/15/2003
Re: Client Project ID: CW0001 OlCastlepoint Landfill
York Project No.: 03080223
CT License No, PH -0723 New York License No, 10854 Mass. License No. M -M 06 Rhode Island License No. 93 NJ License No. CT401
netiw
l?pj
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORD, CT 06906 (2031 325-1 37 1 FAX (203) 357-01 66
Page 1 of 4
Report Date: 8/15/2003
Client Project ID: CW00010/Castlepoint Landfill
York Project No.: 03080223
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Rich Cornarda
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 08108103. The project was identifed as your project "CW00010/Castlepoint
Landfill."
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is.
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
SW -1
MW -8R
York Sample ID
03080223-01
03080223-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m
340
4.0
792
4.0
B.O.D.(5-da)
EPA 405.1
m L
3.0
1.0
10
1.0
Bromide
EPA300/SW9056
mg/l
Not detected
0.2
0.50
0.2
Calcium
SW846-6010
m /L
67.8
0.020
381
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
mg/L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m L
3.36
0.5
61.8
0.5
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m L
Not detected
10.0
150
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
m /L
0.607
0.005
49.5
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m L CaCO3
307
1.0
1250
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m L
4.62
0.500
12.5
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m L
33.4
0.020
72.1
0.020
Man anese
SW846-6010
m L
0.240
0.005
8.96
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m L
26.7
0.10
36.4
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m L
0.08
0.05
0.64
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m L
Not detected
0.05
0.34
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m L
0.067
0.005
0.071
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
mg/L.
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
1 0.05
YORK
Page 2 of 4
Client Sample ID
SW -1
MW -9
MW -8R
York Sample ID
York Sample ID
03080223-01
03080223-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
WATER
Units
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Sulfate
EPA 300
m
63.3
0.2
77.1
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.I
m
395.0
0.5
607.0
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
m L
1.06
0.10
1.93
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m L
1.1
1.0
8.0
1.0
Turbidi
EPA 180.1
NTU
2.93 i 1
0
1120
0
Client Sample ID
MW -9
York Sample ID
03080223-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m
L
700
20.0
B.O.D.(5-da
EPA 405.1
m
L
4.0
1.0
Bromide
EPA300/SW9056
m
l
Not detected
0.2
Calcium
SW846-6010
m
L
86.4
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m
10.9
0.5
C.O.D.
SM 508B
MIAL
Not detected
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
m
9.17
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m CaCO3
344
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m
4.65
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
L
31.1
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
mgIL
0.309
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m .
L
18.3
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m
L
0.46
0.25
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m
Not detected
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
m
L
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
m
L
104
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m
431.0
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
m
1.38
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m
Not detected
1.0
Turbidity -EPA
180.1
NTU
74.0
0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm ; ug/L = ppb For SoiWSolids: mg/kg = ppm ; ug/kg � ppb
YORK
Page 3 of 4
Report Date: 8/15/2003
Ciient Project ID: CW00010/Castlepoint Landfill
York Project No.: 03080223
Notes for York Project No. 03080223
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference,
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made,
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that the Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Laboratory; Watertown, CT.
Approved By
Managing Director
Page 4 of 4
Date: 8/15/2003
YORK
Ed
4t
sz
� J
a
n
.0
Al
\r
U
�
�
�
�
Z
C
f
w
m
Ld
jl
2
�IF
�
�
W
T
I
LLJ
_LD�
Q
c
CL
-
ti
C7
LLJ
❑
Vj
Z
�L
�Q
Q
E�
.a
U
C`1
0
Ly
O
a
�
fl
u
O
r
d �
m
C-:�:q
O
a"
r-
rNik4
��
O
`
Q
C`v
C
N
\
Ia
.m
d
[p
C
f
w
m
jl
2
�IF
�
�
T
I
_LD�
Q
c
CL
-
ti
C7
rME
Lv_
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Phone 8451454-2544 Fax 8451454-2655
www.conradgeo.com
FACSIMILE COVER PAGE
DATE: June 19, 2003
TO:
Andrew Lent
FROM:
Christopher Brown
CC:
Peter Paggi
Town Clerk -Wappingers
Steve Capowski
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet
MESSAGE:
PROJECT # CW000100
FAX:
Attached is a revised data table from the last groundwater monitoring report (2"d quarter
2003). Please note that only, iron exceeds the NYSDOH standard in the supply well. If you
have any questions please contact us.
Confidentiality Notice
The information In this transmission is intended for the individual or entity named above. It may be legally privileged and confidential. If you
have received this Information in error, please notify us immediately and send the original transmission to us by mail. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication or Its contents is strictly prohibited.
RECEIVED
JUN 2 3 2003
TOWN CLERK
RECEIVED
JUN 2 $2.003
TOWN CLERK
Castle Paint Landfill
File # CW000100
July 16, 2003
Page 3
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results - Inorganic Compounds; collected May 28, 2003,
Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
NYSDEC Limit
Chemical Constituent
Method
Supply Well
MW -8R
MW -9
Class GA
Drinkin
Groundwater
Wate
MEN= Biwa
m
;tee.-
�m. �:.�°.m•�µ
-���m_��,�«.�m
6010
0.014
3.68
1.62
Aluminum
NE
NE
Ammonia
2.4
NE
350.1
0.51
1.16
1.08
Antimony
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.008
ND<0.008
ND<0.008
Arsenic
0.025
0.05
6010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
BOD
NE
NE
405.1
2.0
32
32
Beryllium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.001
ND<0.001
ND<0.001
Boron
1.00
NE
6010
0.047
0.245
.0.053
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
67.5
178
94.1
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
74.4
116
232
Chloride
250
250.00
300
4.16
49.9
9.71
Chromium
0.050
0.10
6010
ND<0.005
0.034
0.007
Color (Pt/CI)
15 PVCI
15 Pt/Cl
110.2
1
5
1
Copper
0.200
NE
6010
0.211
0.012
0.015
Hexavalent Chromium
0.050
NE
7196A
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.331
8.65
21.6
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.027
0.014
0.008
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
32.6
51.8
30.5
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.177
5.19
0.326
Mercury
0.002
0.002
6010
ND<0,0002
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
Nickel
NE
NE
6010
0.020
0.012
0.013
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
0.06
0.30
ND<0.05
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
4.86
11.0
5.61
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Enwronmental Scientists
July 16, 2003
Andrew Lent
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 8451454-2544 • fax: 845/454-265
RECEIVED
JUN 17 &3
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
TOWN CLERK
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2003, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the second quarter of
2003 in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual
for the above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On May 28, 2003, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for baseline water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and the onsite supply
well were to be sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9 and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated and,
groundwater was purged from each monitoring well until all physical water quality parameters
had stabilized. Samples were collected from each monitoring well using a dedicated
polyethylene bailer and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for analysis of baseline
parameters as defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Samples were collected from the onsite
supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the on-site supply shed.
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-8R
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R; iron, magnesium, and
manganese. Three other inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standard in PMW-8R; Total
dissolved solids, total hardness, and sodium. Total organic carbon also exceeds the NYSDEC
standard. No VOCs were detected in PMW-8R. All results are presented in the attached tables.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 16, 2003
Page 2
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9; iron and manganese. No
other inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standard in this well. No VOCs were detected
in PMW-9. All results are presented in the attached tables.
Supply Well
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in the supply well; copper, iron and
lead. No other inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standard in the supply well. No
VOCs were detected in the supply well. All results are presented in the attached tables. Excerpts
of the analytical report are appended. A complete copy of the analytical report is on file with
Conrad Geoscience.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to tail. Sampling for the third quarter of
2003 is tentatively scheduled for August 2003.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
F
Christopher Brown, CPG
Hydrogeologist
CBB/rbc
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD GEO5C1ENCE CORP.
J/ ✓
✓` �,P Slit �'�li 'n I'�x ✓"-.� k, vr�
CONryyR.ATT�P�'r{�h Hn
'wJEOSCIENCI �.
CORP.
,8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, Now York 12603
Figure 9
SITE LOCATION MAP
Prepared By. Nss 6101
Reviewed 8y. CBB alai
Castle Paint Landfill
Wappingers Falls., NY
CW000100
Revised By, BPG 2103
'Approved By:
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
ruly 16, 2003
Page 3
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results - inorganic Compounds; collected May 28, 2003,
Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
NYSDEC Limit
Chemical Constituent
Method Supply Well
MW -8R MW -9
Class GA
Drinking
Groundwater)
Water
NE
6010
0.014
3.68
1.82
Aluminum
NE
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
0.51
1.16
1.08
Antimony
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.008
ND<0.008
ND<0.008
Arsenic
0.025
0A5
6010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
BOD
NE
NE
405.1
2,0
32
32
Beryllium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.001
ND<0.001
ND<0.001
Boron
1.00
NE
601.0
0.047
0.245
0.053
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
67.5
178
94.1
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
74.4
116
232
Chloride
250
250.00
300
4.16
49.9
9.71
Chromium
0.050
0.10
6010
ND<0.005
0.034
0.007
Color (Pt/Cl)
15 Pt/C1
15 Pt/CI
110.2
1
5
1
Copper
0.200
NE
6010
0.211
0.012
0.015
Hexavalent Chromium
0.050
NE
7196A
ND<0,01
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.331
8.65
21.6
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.027
0.014
0.008
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
32.6
51.8
30.5
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0,177
5.19
0.326
Mercury
0.002
0.002
6010
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
Nickel
NE
NE
6010
0.020
0.012
0.013
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
0.06
0.30
ND<0.05
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
4.86
11,0
5,61
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 16, 2003
Page 4
Table 1. (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results — Inorganic Compounds; collected May 28,
2003, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
1- Groundwater standards as established in SNYCRR Part 740-745, for class GA groundwater,
2 • Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5.1
NE=Not Eslabiished
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are in mgA unless otherwise slated
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
NYSDEC Limit
Clas GAEDHnking
Chemical Constituent
Method
Supply Weli
MW -8R
MW -9
Groundwater'
47.1
68.0
Sulfate
250
250
300
75.4 ._
Thallium
NE
NE
6010
ND<OA10
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
328
656
340
Total Cyanide
0.100
NE
335.4
ND<0.017
ND<0.01
ND<0.01
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
191
770
432
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
303
657
360
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
351.2
0.70
2.10
1.22
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
ND<1.0
7.7
ND<1.0
Total Phenolics
0.001
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
Zinc
0.3006010
0.156
0.033
0.059
Selenium
10
rNE420.2
6010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
Silver
0.050
6010
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
ND<0.D03
Sodium
20.0
NE :1-6-010
17.6
33.1
17.5
1- Groundwater standards as established in SNYCRR Part 740-745, for class GA groundwater,
2 • Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5.1
NE=Not Eslabiished
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are in mgA unless otherwise slated
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Castle Paint Landfill
File # CW000100
July 16, 2003
Page 5
Table 2 Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA Method
8260; collected May 28, 2003, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent NYSDEC
Limit
Supply Well
MW -8R
MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
20
ND<10.0
ND<10.0
ND<10.0
Benzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromochloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromodichloromethane
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromoform
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
2-Butanone (MEK)
10
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
Carbon Tetrachloride
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloroform
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5
ND -e1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Dibromochloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dibromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Dibromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 4 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1-Dichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
cis -1, 3-Dichloropropene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
Ethylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 16, 2003
Page 6
Table 2 (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA
Method 8260; collected May 28, 2003, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent NYSDEC Supply Well MW -8R
Limit
MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Methylene Chloride
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK)
10
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
Styrene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 2, 2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 1, 2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Tetrachloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Toluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 2 -Trichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Trichloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Trichlorottuoromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Vinyl Chloride
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.o
ND<1.0
m + p -Xylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
o -Xylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,1-Dichloroethytene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
N130.0
1, 1 -Dichloropropylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,3-Trichlorobenaene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,3-Trimethyibenzene
50
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,4-Tdchlorobenaene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3,5-TdmethAbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3-131chloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. rim
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 16, 2003
Page 7
Table 2 (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA
Method 8260; collected May 28, 2003, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent NYSDEC Supply Well
Limit
MW -8R
MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Isopropytbenzene 5 ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Napthalene 10 ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
n-Butytbenzene 5 ND<1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
n-Propylbenzene
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
N0<1.0
pdsopropyttoluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
sec-Butytbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ten-But}Abenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
2-Hexanone
NE
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
ND<1.o
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
4-Chlorotoluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1-Chlorohexane
50
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
ND0.0
2,2-Dichloropropane
5
N130,0
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
2-Chlorotoluene
5
ND<1,0
N0<1.0
ND<1.0
' - Groundwater standards as established In 6NYCRR part 700-705, for class GA groundwater.
2 - Drinking water standard established In NYSDOH Subpart 5-1.
NE=NoI Established
Boldface type Indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are in ucO unless otherwise stated
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Brian Goodwin
Report Date: 6/6/2003
Re: Client Project ID: CW0001 00
York Project No.: 03050802
2003
r
t
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No. 10854 Mass. License No. M -CT 106 Rhode Island License No. 93 NJ License No. CT401
����rr{:� ne a
ONE: RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORD, CT 06906 1203) 325.1 37 1 FAX (203) 357-0166
Page 1 of 7
Report Date: 6/6/2003
Client Project ID: CW00010C
York Project No.: 03050802
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Brian Goodwin
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 05129103. The project was identifed as your project "CW000100 °.
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
001/SW-1
002/MW-8R
York Sam le ID
03050802-01
03050802-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Volatiles -8260 list SW846-8260
u ---
---
---
---
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1-Dichloroeth lene
N.ot detected
1
Not detected
1
1, 1 -Dichloropropytene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trimeth ibenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,4=Trimeth ibenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloro ro ane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
l
1,2-Dichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
YORK
Page 2 of 7
Client Sample ID
001/SW-1
002/MW-8R
York Sample ID
03050802-01
03050802-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL
Results
MDL
I,2-Dichloroeth len Total
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
1,3,5-Trimeth (benzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,3-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1-Chlorohexane
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
2,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
2-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
4-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Benzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Bromobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Bromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Bromodichloromethane
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
Bromoform
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Bromomethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Chlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Chloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Chloroform
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Chloromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloro ro . lene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Dibromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Dibromomethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
lath lbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Isopropylbenzene
Not detected
I
Not detected
I
Methylene chloride
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Naphthalene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
n7Butylbenzene
Not detected
i
Not detected
l
n-Propylbenzene
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
o-X leve
Not detected
i
Not detected
I
- & m-X lens
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
p-Isopropyltoluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
sec-But ]benzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Styrene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
tert-But lbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Toluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
trans- l,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Trichloroethylene
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Vinyl chloride
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
Ketones, target list SW846-8260
u L ---
---
---
---
2-Butanone MEK
Not detected
5.0
Not detected
5.0
.,2-Hexanone
Not detected
5.0
Not detected
5.0
Acetone
Not detected
10.0
Not detected
10.0
Methyl isobut 1 ketone (MIBK)
Not detected
5.0
1 Not detected
5.0
YORK
Page 3 of 7
Client Sample ID
003/MW-9
York Sample 1D
03050802-03
001/SW-1
WATER
0021MW-8R
Units Results MDL
York Sample ID
u L ---
--1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Not detected l
03050802-01
Not detected I
03050802-02
Not detected I
Matrix
Not detected 1
1,1-Dichloroethane
Not detected 1
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Metals, Priority Pollutant List
EPA SW846
m
---
---
---
---
Antimony
Not detected
0.008
Not detected
0.008
Arsenic
Not detected
0.010
Not detected
0.010
Beryllium
Not detected
0.001
Not detected
0.001
Cadmium
Not detected
0.003
Not detected
0.003
Chromium
Not detected
0.005
0.034
0.005
Copper
0.21I
0.006
0.012
0.006
Lead
0.027
0.003
0.014
0.003
Nickel
0.020
0.009
0.012
0.009
Selenium
Not detected
0.010
Not detected
0.010
Silver
Not detected
0.003
Not detected
0.003
Thallium
Not detected
0.010
Not detected
0.010
Zinc
0.156
0.006
0.033
0.006
Mercury
SW846-7470
mg/l,
Not detected
0.0002
Not detected
0.0002
Aluminum
SW846-6010
m
L
0.014
0.010
3.68
0.010
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m
L
328
4.0
656
4.0
Boron
SW846-6010
m
0.047
0.020
0.245
0.020
B.O.D.(5-da)
EPA 405.1
my2l,
2.0
1.0
32
1.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m
L
67.5
0.020
178
0.020
Chloride
EPA 300/SW9056
m
L
4.16
0.5
49.9
0.5
Ammonia
EPA 300/SW9056
m
L
0.51
0.05
1.16
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m
L
0.06
0.05
0.30
0.05
Cyanide, total
EPA 335.2
m
L
Not detected
0.01
Not detected
0.01
C.O.D.
SM 508B
mg/L
74.4
10.0
116
10.0
Color
EPA 110.1
Pt -Co units
1
1
5
1
Chromium, hexavalent
EPA 218.4
m
L
Not detected
0.01
Not detected
0.01
Iron
SW846-6010
m
L
0.331
0.005
8.65
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m
CaCO3
303
1.0
657
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m
4.86
0.500
11.0
0.500
Ma nesium
SW846-6010
m
. L
32.6
0.020
51.8
0.020
ManLanese
SW846-6010
m
0.177
0.005
5.19
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m
L
17.6
0.10
33.1
0.10
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
m
L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
m
L
47.1
0.2
68.0
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m
L
191
0.5
770
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
m
0.70
0.10
2.10
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m
L
Not detected
1.0
7.7
1.0
Turbidi
EPA 180.1
NTU
0.34
0
55.3
0
Client Sample 1D
003/MW-9
York Sample 1D
03050802-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results MDL
Volatiles -8260 list SW846-8260
u L ---
--1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Not detected l
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Not detected I
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Not detected I
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
Not detected 1
1,1-Dichloroethane
Not detected 1
YORK
Page 4 of 7
Client Sample ID
003/MW-9
York Sample ID
03050802-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL
1,1-Dichloroeth leve
Not detected
1
I , I -Dichloropropylene
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloro ro ane
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloroeth lene (Total)
Not detected
I
1,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
I
1,3,5-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
I
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1,3-Dichlor2ro ane
Not detected
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
1-Chlorohexane
Not detected
1
2,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
2-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
4-Chlorotolucne
Not detected
1
Benzene
Not detected
1
Bromobenzene
Not detected
I
Bromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Bromodichlorometbane
Not detected
1
Bromoform
Not detected
1
Bromomethane
Not detected
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Not detected
1
Chlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Chloroethane
Not detected
1
Chloroform
Not detected
1
Chloromethane
Not detected
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
1
Dibromochloromethane
Not detected
I
Dibromomethane
Not detected
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Not detected
1
Eth (benzene
Not detected
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Not detected
1
Iso ro ylbenzene
Not detected
1
Methylene chloride
Not detected
1
Naphthalene
Not detected
1
n-But ]benzene
Not detected
1
n-Propylbenzene
Not detected
1
o-X Iene
Not detected
1
- & m-X lens
Not detected
1
-Iso ro ]toluene
Not detected
1
sec-But lbenzene
Not detected
1
Styrene
Not detected
1
tert-But ibenzene
Not detected
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Not detected
1
Toluene
Not detected
1
YORK
Page 5 of 7
Client Sample ID
003/MW-9
York Sample ID
03050802-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
trans- l,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
I
Trichloroethylene
Not detected
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
Not detected
1
Vinyl chloride
Not detected
1
Ketones, target list
SW846-8260
u
L
---
---
2-Butanone (MEK)
Not detected
5.0
2-Hexanone
Not detected
5.0
Acetone
Not detected
10.0
Methyl isobu 1 ketone (MIBK)
Not detected
5.0
Metals, Priori ty Pollutant List
EPA SW846
mg/L
---
---
Antimony
Not detected
0.008
Arsenic
Not detected
0.010
Be llium
Not detected
0.001
Cadmium
Not detected
0.003
Chromium
0.007
0.005
Copper
0.015
0.006
Lead
0.008
0.003
Nickel
0.013
0.009
Selenium
Not detected
0.010
Silver
Not detected
0.003
Thallium
Not detected
0.010
Zinc
0.059
0.006
Mercury
SW846-7470
mg/L
Not detected
0.0002
Aluminum
SW846-6010
mg/L
1.82
0.010
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
mgIL
340
10.0
Boron
SW846-6010
mg/L
0.053
0.020
B.O.D.(5-da)
EPA 405.1
mg/L
32
1.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
mg/L
94.1
0.020
Chloride
EPA 300/SW9056
mg/L
9.71
0.5
Ammonia
EPA 300/SW9056
m
1.08
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m
Not detected
0.05
Cyanide, total
EPA 335.2
mg/L
Not detected
0.01
C.O.D.
SM 50813
mg/L
232
10.0
Color
EPA 110.1
Pt -Co units
1
1
Chromium, hexavalent
EPA 218.4
m
L
Not detected
0.01
Iron
SW846-6010
rn
21.6
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
mg/L CaCO3
360
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
mg/L
5.61
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
mg/L
30.5
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
0.326
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
_mg/L
mg/L
17.5
0.10
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
m
L
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate'
EPA 300
mg/L
75.4
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
mg/L
432
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
rn
1.22
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m
L
Not detected
1.0
Turbidity
EPA 180.1
NTU
165
0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm ; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm ; ug/kg = ppb
YORK
Page 6 of 7
Report Date: 6/6/2003
Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 03050802
Notes for York Project No. 03050802
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that TOC analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS, Watertown, CT.
r
Approved By: Date: 6/6/2003
Obert Q. Bradley (,,
Managing Director
Y01DV
Page 7 of 7
� 4
O.
U
=
E
v
y
l
T 7Ca
(4�
O
Oo Z
n_ W
rz
c'n S
40
~ a
is f 1 1
` r + e r
LD
N
'ty
?
43)
b
f1
fn
E
~
Z
—�
a
E E
2
L)
d o
Lrl4s
4 O
rn
o �
n
x
U
D
N
cr
C
f.Z
�
a
a� a
�
JCL
I IA , m
(�
m
O
N
A.-•
-`
i,
z
o
O
Li In W 0 m
vs
O
m U
,
a
a
o �0
tj
y,
QC
L
J C
Q Z
c
Q
Z F
p p cl
D
P)
t�- �
E }�
J Q
h
y
W
O
Q N U
C= �,�
GONRAI) UEOSC IENCP CORP.
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 - 845/454-2544 - fax: 845/454-2655
RECE1'v0
MAR 7`s:
TOWN C LE Fr i...
March 18, 2003
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd., 5th Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5$05
Re: Gas Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2003; Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger,
Dutchess County, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCMMP).
On February 27, 2003, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (Oz) from 12 gas vents around
the perimeter of the landfill. Measurements were also collected in and around nearby structures.
Sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill gas monitoring.
Measurements were taken within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these vents if methane
was detected inside.
Of the 12 vent locations monitored, only one location (GV -17) had detectable concentrations of
methane within the gas vent (20% of the LEL).
• No vents had detectable concentrations of methane above or below the vent pipe.
• LEL readings in the on-site building and gazebo were 0.0%.
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
March 18, 2003
Page 3
CTac Manitarino Lno
Date:
2-27-03
Pressure: 30.18
Project#
CW000100 - 1s1 Q 2003 Gas Monitoring
Initials: BPG
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 - inside
30.18
0
0
19.1
15:39
GV -2 - inside
30.18
0
0
20.3
15:37
GV -5 - inside
30.18
0
0
20,2
15:35
GV -6 - inside
30.98
0
0
20.2
15:54
GV -7 - above
30.18
0
0
20.2
15:55
GV -7 - inside
30.18
0
0
20.0
15:56
GV -8 - inside
30.18
0
0
19.5
15:51
GV -11 - above
30.18
0
0
20.5
15:27
GVA 1 - inside
30.18
0
0
20.5
15:28
GV -11 - below
30.18
0
0
20.5
15:29
GV -12 - above
30.18
0
0
20.5
15:30
GV -12 - inside
30.18
0
0
19.5
15:31
GV -12 - below
30.18
0
0
20.4
15:32
GV -13 - inside
30.18
0
0
20.4
15:34
GV -15 - above
30.18
0
0
20.2
15:57
GV -15 -- inside
30.18
0
0
19.1
15:59
GV -15 - below
30.18
0
0
20.2
15:58
GV -16 - above
30.18
0
0
20.4
15:33
GV -16- inside
30.18
0
0
19.0
15:34
GV -16 - below
30.18
0
0
20.4
15:35
Building
Closed for winter
COMMENTS
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP,
1\FRONTICONRADOEOICW000 I OOILANDFILL GAS MON IT0RINQ2W310ASM0NIT I STQ2003.UOC
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
March 18, 2003
Page 4
rae Mnni+nrinrr I nn
Date:
2-27-03
Pressure: 30.18
Project#
CW000100 —1s' Q 2003 Gas Monitoring
Initials: BPG
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -17 — above
30.18
0
0
20.4
15:45
GV -17 — inside
30.18
1.0
20
14.5
15:46
GV -17 — below
30.18
0
0
20.2
15:47
[Gazebo.
30.18
0
0
20.3
15:49 —]
L.VMMCIN I J
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
h1FRONTICONRADGEOIC WOOOl0O1LANDFILL CAS MONITORINC12003NOASMONIT I STQ2003.POC
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. cc, . fi
Lnwronnrenta6Saentuts 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • ax: 8451454-2655
ve "" o\J E
March 18, 2003
MAR 2 0 ZC03
Andrew Lent -VOWN CLERK
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2003, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the first quarter of 2003 in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
i'
On February 27, 2003, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells were sampled and
analyzed: PMW-8R, PMW-9. The on-site supply well was turned off for the winter months and
therefore was not sampled at this time.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater from Monitoring Well PMW-SR and PMW-9 were purged until all physical water
quality parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and
PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for
analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
March 18, 2003
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-8R
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: Iron (1.19 ppb),
magnesium (47.0 ppb) and manganese (4.24 ppb). Total Organic Carbon (7.5 ppb) exceeds
NYSDEC standards. Other inorganic parameters exceeding NYSDEC standards include sodium
(33.2 ppb), total hardness (589 ppb), and total dissolved solids (730 ppb). All results are
presented in the attached table (analytical report appended). No other inorganic parameters
exceed NYSDEC standards.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron (0.633 ppb). All
results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC
standards.
Analytical reports are appended. Sampling for the 2 quarter of 2003 is tentatively
scheduled for May 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Fay, f b�l�
Brian P. Goodwin
Geologist
BPG/mbl
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Dan O'Connor - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. ME
Table 1. Groundwater Samples; 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 1St Quarter 2003,
samples collected February 27, 2003; Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
PMW-BR
PMW-9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinking
Water'
�:en"•'m
w^w�m"..m.8°...:°d
",..mnw r:�r`� a .»».»��,.v' Lid: 5-`V .. •.. ON: m- .
_ .
v
'a�..";:a"w`.G'-ixi";a,^W.":::omwe m... Ya..m" _°P.'m:P&Yamm
«�.. V _ �:�"�«. w>9��W ^` W ^t^ TM�Y�tit
v°3[��,i'ai x'1.»9.
:� e
"..'8
�-^ ip".^„,�•�m+^:§_
Ammonia
2.0
NE
300 0.75
0.47
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010 ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010 159
84.9
C.O.D.
NE
NE
5086 122
106
Chloride
250
250
300 61.9
11.0
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
r .
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
r 29.9
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.188
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
1.82
ND<0,05
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
10.5
5.27
Sulfate
250
250
300
75.0
84.5
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
403
610
370
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
f 270
Total hardness (mg/L
CaCO3)
500
NE
314E
335
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
5058Pend
Pend
Total Phenols
0.001
NE
420.1/2
ND<0.05 ND<0.05
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
19.2
Turbidity (NTUs)
NE
NE
180.1
6.50 22.8
Notes;
1- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 790-705, for class GA groundwater;
2 • Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5.1;
NE=Not Established;
Boldrace type indicates those Parameters, which exceed NYSDEC standards;
Units are in mgll unless otherwise stated;
N5= Not sampled,
CONRAt) GEOSCiENCE CORP.
_'it iii Nevi
,!�
MA
Xz-
f�`C+ .� f •. r' Vii: � ' _ ¢Pc;` � � �� / �_\✓ �r _�+
wton
Ifl
`
s\hsrr-- _�—ai � fI�F ,.' lf� ey�jAol ei
f4l
`�
f ! JJ 11 f / r�l�+� , 4 ff`• Olr
% SITE t j�01
siall k ,
j �' ,{� � 1'� 1yt ► ��. r � � 4yk+' a
/ i; Ilfr �� t ' \ti i ....` i✓ vir m"ia!
rta Eahie7 I ' l
1 I
C(�1h'01�g4`
r �r r � s jF 1 � t -\ � ��~ � L '` f � � `1• / r ' r � l � � i J /f
r 1
Piling
IoLr
+ ��, 1 �' ii �i•� rayl �� l/ -. ���,F�r�°�1 r _ ,.f '�f
�&Z.
r ng
/r� -� � �,"i, l � ,,� ✓�'`i:. � �? ��� r1 + ,� rf(fr� t�j�� i � //�, r r y
way.
a __
CONRAD n 1
GEOSCIENCE I V
CORP.
6 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Figure 1 SITE LOCATION MAP
Prepared By: Nss "I
Reviewed By: CBS 3101 Castle Point Landfill
Revised 8y: BPO "3 Wappingers Falls, NY
Approved By: CW000100
OV1712003 16:30 2033570166 YAL PAGE 02
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geosclence
9 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10985
Attention: Brian Goodwin
Report Date. 3/7/2003
Re: Client Project ID: CW000100/Castle ,Point LF
York Project No.; 03020542
CT .Licenx No. PH -0723 NeW York License No. 10854 Mass, License No, M•CT74d Rhode Island LPcanse'No. 93 EPA J.D. No. CT00106
• i5e �
r )Ni n
FneTa-p�
❑NE RESEARCH DRIVW STAMFOROp CT (36$06 (203) 325-137 1 '
�px r2a�l 357-C11 Gs
Pagel of 3
0:a?17/2063 15:30 2633570166 YAL PAGE 63
Report Date; 3/7/2003
Client Project ID: CWO001QO/Castle Point LF
York Project No.: 03020542
Conrad Geoacience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10905
Attention: Brian Goodwin
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chairs -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 02128103. The project was identifed as your project "CWOOO1 OO/Castle Point
LF."
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s)-
Analysis Results
YORK
Pk9e 2 of 3
02;"17/2003 16:30 2033570166 YAL PAGE 04
Client Sam pie ID
MW -8R
MW -9
'Rork Sam le ID
03920542-01
030ZO542-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Paranneter Method
Units Results
MDL Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m 7.5
1.0 Not detected 1.0
Turbidity EPA 180.1
NTU 6,50
0 22.8 1 0
Units Key. For Watcrs/l,igifids: mg/L : ppm ; ug/l, = ppl) For Soils/Soli& mg./kg = ppm ; ug/kg = pph
Notes for York Project No. 03020542
1, The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non,
target analytes and matrix interf'erenee.
2. Samples are retained For a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York For the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc,
5. All samples were received in proper eondition for analysis with proper documentation.
0. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that the TQC analyses teported herein were subcontracted to EAS Laboratories; Watertown, CT,
Approved By: L'��VU'�V
Robert Q.dley
Managing ctor
Page 3 of 3
Date, 3/7/2003
YORK
RW'17/ 2003 16: 30
20335707.66
YAL
PAGE 05
CP
a o
� s
o
N
�
°'?
o
L
a
a
E
'0
W
�
C
;.,
p
Q
SCL
�
�
+�a
aux
4
'Q
3
S
��
o W 4
YAL
PAGE 05
CP
a o
� s
o
N
�
°'?
o
L
a
a�
�.� a
4
a
�
C
;.,
p
O
�
�
+�a
aux
4
'Q
3
S
��
o W 4
1
of
F "+O
Fl.
i
E�
m N
rn0
C�
Z
N
ti
E
g
�
coC
YAL
PAGE 05
CP
a o
°'?
o
U
;.,
p
in
m
i
E�
C�
%jo
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Phone 8451454-2544 Fax 8451454-2655
www.conradgeo.com
FACSIMILE COVER PAGE
DATE: January 15, 2003
TO: Andrew Lent
CC: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Cleric - Wappingers Palls
Dan O'Connor - Dutchess County DOH
FROM: Christopher Brown
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet
MESSAGE:
PROJECT # CWOooloo
FAX:
Corrected Table 1, enclosed, from 4th Quarter Ground Monitoring Report for Castle Point
Landfill.
Confidentiality Notice
The Information in this transmission is Intended for the individual or entity named above. It maybe legally privileged and confidential. If you
have received this Infwmation in error, please notify us immediately and send the original transmission to us by mail. If the reader of this
message Is not the Intended reciplent, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication or Its contents is strictly prohibited.
RECEIVED
JAN 16 1
TOWN CLERK
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results - 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 3rd Quarter
2002, samples collected November 19, 2002, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Notes:
1- Groundwater standards as estaUshed In 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater.
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpar) 5-1
NE=Not Estabtlshed
Boldface type Zicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are in mgA unless otherwise stated
NS= Not sampled
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
NYSDEC Limit
Chemical Constituent
Method
Supply Well
PMW-8R
PMW-9
Class GA
Drinkin
Groundwater'
Watey
Routine Parameters
Ammonia2.€3
NE
350.1
0-93
0.12
0.95
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
68.1
130
56.7
C.O.D.NE
NE
410.4
ND<10.0
23.6
31.5
Chloride
250
250
300
2.65
11.9
10.3
iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.181
2.13
19.4
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.043
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
33.6
27.0
30.7
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.163
0.758
0.392
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
ND<0,05
3,62
0.07
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
5.17
8.69
5.13
Sulfate
250
250
300
57.0
47.0
66.2
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
330
460
340
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
501
478
334
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
308
436
268
(mgiL iaCO3)
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
ND<1.0
2.8
1.1
Total Phenols
0.001
NE
420.2
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
21.5
10.8
17.7
Turbidity
NE
NE
SM214A
0.48
160
194
Notes:
1- Groundwater standards as estaUshed In 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater.
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpar) 5-1
NE=Not Estabtlshed
Boldface type Zicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are in mgA unless otherwise stated
NS= Not sampled
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
CONRAD GEOSCaIENCE CORP.
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 8451454-2544 • fax; 84514542655
RECEIVED
.SAN 13 2003
TOWN CLERK
January 10, 2003
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd., 5th Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
Re: Gas Monitoring Report, Fourth Quarter 2002; Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger,
Dutchess County, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCMMP).
On December 19, 2002, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane
(CH4), percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (02) from 12 gas vents
around the perimeter of the landfill. Measurements were also collected in and around nearby structures.
. Sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill gas monitoring.
Measurements were taken within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these vents if methane
was detected inside.
Of the 12 vent locations monitored, six vents had detectable concentrations of methane within
the gas vent. One of these vents exhibited values in excess of 40% of the LEL (GV -7).
• No vents had detectable concentrations of methane above or below the vent pipe.
0 LEL readings in the on-site building and gazebo were 0.0%.
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
January W, 2003
Paget
Data from all gas monitoring points are presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring
for the first quarter of 2003 has been tentatively scheduled for February. If you have any questions or
comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CON GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown, CPG
Hydrogeologist
CBB/mbl
attachments
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paggi w/ attachments
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP,
C:1MY D0CUMVNTS1C0N1;LAD OEOSCIENCE1CW000100TANDFILL OAS MONITOR1NG120021GASMONIT I STQ2002,DOC M
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
January 10, 2003
Page3
(was Monitorinor T,nu
Date:
12-19-02
Pressure: 30.09
Project#
CW000100 - 4'h Q 2002 Gas Monitoring
Initials: KJR
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 -in ide
30.09
0
0
20.9
1126
GV -2 -inside
30.09
0
0
20.9
1125
GV -5 - inside
30.09
0
0
20.9
1124
GV -6 - inside
30.09
0
0
20.9
1108
GV -7 -- above
30.09
0
0
20,9
1110
GV -7 - inside
30.09
2.0
40
18.1
1111
GV -7 - inside
30.09
0
0
20.9
1111
GV -8 - inside
30.09
0
0
20.9
1131
GV -11 -a ove
30.09
0
0
20.9
1114
GV -11 - inside
30.09
0
0
20.8
1114
GV -11 -below
30.09
0
0
20.9
1115
GV -12 - above
30.09
0
0
20.9
1116
GV -12 - inside
30.09
0
0
19.5
1116
GV -12 - below
30.09
0
0
20.9
1117
GV -13 - inside
30.09
0
0
20.9
1120
GV -14 -above
30.09
0
0
20.9
1128
GV -14 - inside
30.09
0
0
20.7
1128
GV -14 - below
30.09
0
0
20.9
1129
G. -15 -a ove
30.09
0
0
20.9
1242
GV -15 -- inside
30.09
0
0
20.9
1301
GV -15 -below
30.09
0
0
20.9
1310
Building
Closed for winter
GVMMLN 15
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP,
ONY DOCUMENTSICONRAD GEOSCIENCE1CW0001 MLANDPILL GAS MONITORING120021GASMONIT I STQ2002.DOC
Castle Point Landfill -Town of Wappinger
January 10, 2003
Page4
Gas Monitoring Lop
Date:
12-19-02
Pressure: 30.09
Project#
CW000100 — 4t' Q 2002 Gas Monitoring
Initials: KJR
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -16 — above
30.09
0
0
20.9
1117
GV -16— inside
30.09
0
0
18.7
1118
GV -16 — below
30.09
0
0
20.9
1119
PV -1
30.09
0
0
20.9
1133
PV -2
30.09
0
0
20.9
1135
Gazebo
30.09
0
0
20.9
1105
COMMENTS
Exceedences of 25% of the LEL are bolded
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
C:WY DOCUMENTSICONRAD GEOSCIRNMCW000100TANDPILL GAS MON[TORING1200210ASMONITISTQ2002.DOC ME
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Anvironmenta! Scientists
December 2, 2002
G Q_'
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/454-2655
Andrew Lent
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Fourth Quarter 2002, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the fourth quarter of 2002
in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On November 19, 2002, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct
quarterly groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality
parameters as defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells were
sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9. The on-site supply well was turned off for the winter
months and therefore was not sampled or analyzed at this time.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater was purged from Monitoring Well PMW-9 until all physical water quality
parameters had stabilized. Monitoring Well PMW-8R was purged dry to ensure sampling of
representative formation water. Samples were collected from Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and
PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories
analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). R�Gtweo
TOWN CL�.RK
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
December 2, 2002
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-8R
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: Iron and Manganese.
Total Organic Carbon also exceeded NYSDEC standards. All results are presented in the
attached table (analytical report appended). No other inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC
standards.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron and Manganese. All
results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC
standards.
Analytical reports are appended. Sampling for the I" quater of 2003 is tentatively
scheduled for January 2002. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONFAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown, CPG
Hydrogeologist
CBB/mbl
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Dan O'Connor - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD GROSC1ENCECORP,
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results -- 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 3rd
Quarter 2002, samples collected August 27, 2002, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers
Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
PMW-8R
PMW-9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinking
Water2
'.%:^.n -'xx:-m»�s r',.�:a"»r.:g:�_.m•^.�.tl�8.e:9:>"..'§�.«"..»«»�-8-.'it»
G� � �_�mmm..�®'.3^..... .»d° <«....-^'re«.,,.
r�'yy�� .�v� ����iss� _'A�.,:i9
®rjy �r�g� 1:4�� �"x'Y.'m' e'®^m�m.�'..
.. $'m._.mm,.,.. "v m-m.:e e C'Y•" wwc.,`.�":..^...^.'x'
..w�..... ..:L_mma..m
'8q•.��'"^......
e�m'.s .tT`e°..^.'>.:'".°'."a':
.» ..«..^C.
'°^g'..9...^.«.,tt¢ d'iE=`rem--`"."t'„"'
q �Y�¢."..«Y,.•...4.:
:: «^""m _ i^S..^.�.
�.msx.',C.T 'i.».w
^a :f'::'E'`` s..Y
�..�:L«GEY�e"e^..«..
^°�"" '=':R:«:".r. a:.r.'^."°."w..m.m_
m�..4'.4.'... °"°;.:....:
':= ®ad«.'^.«�s.
:'»'_'� ��..R»R:« «'" »:'.s^."�9v..Po",9v„fq=
�..e.3...$'q,..
-
m«°:.:1?gn. °.eM.T^^^..d«»M'.,..«..
w'a°'f^"'v.w='",«,y�.,"s'°'"4%�V
».�a:rsgedtm:: :.m^^":4:.»«: »";�.",'»'".«»» ���
� t. --n'ix 0.^.v: ^^:.s�
s�..,�..y.•s=�'»:-'-'.L"Exr_'�mm..
'�S e'.Y'�..i;�am .m.w®..°.�.:«•,:...«xM�«"L"g
_ sri.,.. �T..sc^.3.""�w
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
0.93
0.12
0.95
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
68.1
130
56.7
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
ND<10.0
23.6
31.5
Chloride
250
250
300
2.65
11.9
10.3
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.181
2.13
19.4
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.043
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
33.6
27.0
30.7
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.163
0.758
0.392
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
ND<0.05
3.62
0.07
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
5.17
8.69
5.13
Sulfate
250
250
300
57.0
47.0
66.2
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
330
460
340
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
501
478
334
Total Hardness
(mg1L CaCO3)
500
NE
130.2
308
436
268
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
ND<1.0
2.8
1.1
Total Phenols
0.001
NE
420,2
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
NO<0.05
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
21.5
10.8
17.7
Turbidity
NE
NE
SM214A
0.48
160
194
Notes:
'-Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater,
2 'Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
units are in ngA unless otherwise stated
NS= Not sampled
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Keith Robinson
Report Date: 11/27/2002
Re: Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 02110512
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No 10854 Mass. License No. M-CT106 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA 1.D. No. CTOO106
,k=neic(E"a
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORD, CT 06906 (2133) 325-1 371 FAX (20 3) 357-01 66
Page 1 of 3
Report Date: 1 ] /27/2002
Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 02110512
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Keith Robinson
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 11120/02. The project was identifed as your project "CW000100 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sam. le ID
MW -8R
MW -9
York Sample ID
02110512-01
02110512-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MAL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m L
460
20.0
1 340
20.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m /L
130
0.020
56.7
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m /L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Iron
SW846-6010
rn /L
2.13
0.005
19.4
0.005
Potassium
SW846-6010
m /L
8.69
0.500
5.13
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m /L
27.0
0.020
30.7
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m /L
0.758
0.005
1 0.392
0.005
Sodium
,SW846-6010
m /L
10.8
0.10
1 17.7
0.10
Lead
SW846-6010
m /L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA 300/SW9056
m /L
11.9
0.5
10.3
0.5
Ammonia
EPA 300/SW9056
m /L
0.12
0.05
0.95
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m /L
3.62
0.05
0.07
0.05
G.O.D.
SM 508B
m /L
23.6
10.0
31.5
10.0
Hardness, total
SM314B
m /L CaCO3
436
1.0
268
1.0
Phenols, Total
Sulfate
EPA 420,112
EPA 300
m /L
m /L
Not detected
47.0
0.05
0.2
Not detected
66.2
0.05
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m /L
478
0.5
334
0.5
YORK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample 1D
MW -811
MW -9
York Sample ID
02110512-01
02110512-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m /L 2.8
1.0 1.1 1.0
Turbidity EPA 180.1
NTU 160
0 194 0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm, uglL = ppb For SoiWSolids: mg/kg = ppm , ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 02110512
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shalt not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that TOC analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Labs., Watertown,CT.
Approved By: I ifi� G
Robert 0. Brdley
Managing Di lector
Page 3 of 3
Date: 11/27/2002
YORK
o C N�,� N 0
y C o E E
tar
a) rn O y G (; rl •a m _
p
A
N z
�m
ECL
•� � it W s� 1 - ._
m C
ino CL w �U c
z Q
V p
4
oZ>
o v
' aLU
r F=
~a L t
V ti
V n o
m
FA
MOM
NU�lN
S� c E E
w m
CU
Co ff.'s rn to
N
r 4-
Q
n lz�P
>flm N IWD 1-2
gCO
Q L 4~ L 1
OmQ W 6L
IX L
Q Z
omN
o o
C+ONRAD GEOSCIENCE, CORP.
Environmental Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 84514542655
RECEIvED
ocT 2 2 2002
October 18, 2002
TOWN CLERK
Andrew Lent
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Third Quarter 2002, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the third quarter of 2002
in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On August 27, 2002, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and the on-site supply
well were sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9, and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater was purged from Monitoring Well PMW-9 until all physical water quality
parameters had stabilized. Monitoring Well PMW-8R was purged dry to ensure sampling of
representative formational water. Samples were collected from Monitoring Wells PMW-8R and
PMW-9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for
analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Samples were
collected from the onsite supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the onsite supply shed.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
October 17, 2002
Page 2
VIR&IIiJV
Monitoring Well PMW-SR
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R: Iron, Magnesium,
Manganese, and Sodium. Total Dissolved Solids, Total Hardness, and Total Organic Carbon
also exceed NYSDEC standards. All results are presented in the attached table. No other
inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC standards.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron and Sodium. All
results are presented in the attached table. No other inorganic parameters exceed NYSDEC
standards.
Supply Well SW -1
No inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standards in SW -1. Results are presented
in the attached table.
Analytical reports are appended. Sampling for the 4th Quarter of 2002 is tentatively
scheduled for November 2002. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CON . GEOSCIENCE CORP.
z-�
Christopher B. Brown, CPG
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Dan O'Connor - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD CiIiOSC711SNCi? CORP. r ^
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results -- 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 3rd Quarter
2002, samples collected August 27, 2002, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New
York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
PMW-8R
PMW-9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinkin
Water'
Routfrle Parameters , '
, .:
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
0.93
0.33
0.94
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
68.1
283
101
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
ND<10.0
90.8
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250
300
2.65
20.6
9.62
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.181
24.0
26.3
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.043
0.050
0.006
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
33.6
47.8
31.0
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.163
4.68
0.484
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
ND<0.05
0.11
ND<0,05
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
5.17
15.1
6.53
Sulfate
250
250
300
57.0
86.7
93.0
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
330
680
340
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
501
621
472
Total Hardness
(mg/L CaCO3)
500
NE
130.2
308
904
379
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
ND<1.0
1.9
ND<1.0
Total Phenols
0.001
NE
420.2
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
21.5
30.1
18.8
Turbidity
NE
NE
SM214A
0.48
3,400
332
Notes:
1- Groundwater standards as established In 6NYCRR Pari 706-706. for class GA groundwater.
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are In mgA unless otherwise stated
NS= Not sampled
Com,,, I] GuosciENCI . C01W. rim
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Report Date: 9/11/2002
Re: Client Project ID: CW00100
York Project No.: 02080697
CT License No. PH -0723 New fork License No. 10854 Mass. License No. M-CT106 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA I.U. No. CT00106
ne a
ONE RESEARCH URIV[ STAMFORD, CT 06906 (203) 325-1371 FAX (203) 357-0166
Pagel of 3
Report Date: 9/1.1/2002
Client Project ID: CW00100
York Project No.: 02080697
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 08128102. The project was identifed as your project "CW00100 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
SW -1
MW -9
York Sample ID
02080697-01
02080697-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalin -Total
SM403
m /L
330
10.0
340
20.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m /L
68.1
0.020
101
0,020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m /L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m L
2.65
0.5
9.62
0.5
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m /L
Not detected
10.0
25.9
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
m /L
0.181
0.005
26.3
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m /L CaCO3
308
1.0
379
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
mg/L
5.17
0.500
6.53
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m IL
33.6
0.020
31.0
0.020
Man anese
SW846-6010
m IL
0.163
0.005
0.484
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m /L
21.5
0.10
18.8
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m /L
0.93
0.10
0.94
0.10
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m /L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m /L
0.043
0.005
0.006
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m /L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
m /L
57.0
0.2
93.0
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m L
501
0.5
472
0.5
YORK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
SW -1
MW -9
York Sample ID
02080597-01
02080697-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m /L Not detected
1.0 Not detected 1.0
Turbidity EPA 180.1
NTU 0.48
0 332 0
Client Sample ID
MW -8R
York Sample ID
02080697-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m
680
20.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m L
283
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m L
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m
20.6
0.5
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m L
90.8
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
m L
24.0
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m L CaCO3
904
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m /L
15.1
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m L
47.8
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m
4.68
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m L
30.1
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m
0.33
0.10
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m L
0.11
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m L
0.050
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
m L
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
m L
86.7
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
rn L
621
0.5
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m L
1.9
1.0
Turbidi
EPA 180.1
NTU
34.00
0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm ; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm; ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 02080697
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS, Watertown, CT.
Approved : �l� d Date: 9/11/2002
pP B Y
Robert Q. Aradley
Managing tirector
YORK
Page 3 of 3
Td WEB i ZOO7- 90 'apw Z66699ZSb8 : 'ON XUJ SOD : Wo8i
N
1
�
if3 V c..
U G1
ca3
.
wZ3
-o
CL
1�
f
a
Cf)3.
:_
Y
E
m
1''
W
,P »"
i
rn
.r
M 0 0
N
E
E
C
ctLU
%Wan 0
1'
tid
IWO
_
7
N
7
Q
a
m
cog
X10
�1'...
q > O
a= o N c,►
*O
p
y
r of
p
Z
Q ¢
MW
m
$
t�0
f
J oL mYt
CQ1 Z H CC1
vtq
Z
i�:
m
V
co
Td WEB i ZOO7- 90 'apw Z66699ZSb8 : 'ON XUJ SOD : Wo8i
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, ING.
ix: '� �a�iw."..i!•o d'.'�„?:''” C":.u�aji�K' "1t; a'� 4; :' } ��&: �' iM,`, '
MM
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Report Date: 9/11/2002
Re: Client Project ID: CW00100
York Project No.: 02080697
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No, 10854 Mass, License No. M-CT106 Rhode Island License No. 93 CPA I.D. No. CT00106
<<re[nelFJ
ONE RESEARCH ❑RIVI STAMFORD, CT 06906
Page 1 of 3
(203) 325-1 371 FAX (203) 357-0166
Report Date: 9/11/2002
Client Project ID: CW00100
York Project No.: 02080697
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 08128102. The project was identifed as your project "CW00100 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
SW -1
MW -9
York Sample ID
02080697.01
02080697-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m IL
330
10.0
340
20.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m /L
68.1
0.020
101
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m IL
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m IL
2.65
0.5
9.62
0.5
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m IL
Not detected
10.0
25.9
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
m /L
0.181
0.005
26.3
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m IL CaCO3
308
1.0
379
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m /L
5.17
0.500
6.53
0.500
Magnesium
SW 846-6010
mg/l,
33.6
0.020
31.0
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m /L
0.163
0.005
0.484
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m /L
21.5
0.10
18.8
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m /L
0.93
0,10
0.94
0.10
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m IL
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m /L
0.043
0.005
0.006
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
m /L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
mg IL
57.0
0.2
93,0
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m /L
501
0.5
472
0.5
YORK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
SW -1
MW -9
York Sample ID
02080697-01
02080697-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m /L PENDING
1.0 PENDING 1.0
Turbidity EPA 180.1
NTU 0.48
0 332 0
Client Sample ID
MW -8R
York Sample ID
02080697-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m /L
680
20.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m /L
283
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m /L
Not detected
0,005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m L
20.6
0.5
C.O.D,
SM 508B
m IL
90,8
10,0
Iron
SW846-6010
m /L
24,0
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m IL CaCO3
904
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m /L
15.1
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
rn /L '
47:8
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m /L
4.68
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m /L
30.1
0,10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
mg/
0.33
0.10
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m L
0.11
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m /L
0.050
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m /L
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
m /L
86.7
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160,1
m /L
621
0.5
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
m L
PENDING
1.0
Turbidity
EPA 180.1
NTU
3400
0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm ; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm; ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 02080697
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5, All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation,
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS, Watertown, CT.
Approved By: Date: 9/11/2002
Robert Q. Br ley
Managing Difktor
TP
YORK
Page 3 of 3
I
N
TH WUDE:ET TOOE 90 'u' --W 2-66699zSVO : 'ON XUJ
DJD : WMIJ
� c
�
C
�
c
m
d
�a
0
ca
�
z
7
W
H
c.
'
w
a
cz
LU
o
�
LU
z
Q
q
q
Lu
o
—.
O
O
cc
0
Q
c�
r
Z
�
�
O
�CC
co
U)
TH WUDE:ET TOOE 90 'u' --W 2-66699zSVO : 'ON XUJ
DJD : WMIJ
LaiCONRAr) GEOSCIENCE CORP.
6'arviv-asmaentad t5�ienttsts
—
March 13, 2002
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/4.54-2544 • fax: 845/454-2655
Andrew Lent
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2002, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the first quarter of 2002
in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On January 16, 2002, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and the on-site supply
well were to be sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9, and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Samples from monitoring well PMW-8R and supply well SW -1 were not collected for
this round. Monitoring well PMW-8R, once purged, did not produce a sufficient volume of
water for sampling. Supply well SW -1 is turned off during the winter months.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater was purged from Monitoring Well PMW-9 until all physical water quality
parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Well PMW-9 using a
dedicated polyethylene bailer and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for analysis of routine .
parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
March 13, 2002
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9, Iron and Manganese. All
results are presented in the attached tables.
Sincerely,
CONR/AD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAD GF:OSCIRNO.: Com'.
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results — 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 15t Quarter
2002, samples collected January 16, 2002, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
PMW-8R
PMW-9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinking
Water
Routine Parameters
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
NS
NS
0,94
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
NS
NS
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
NS
NS
82.2
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
NS
NS
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250
300
NS
NS
8.7
Iron
0.300
0,300
6010
NS
NS
9.73
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
NS
NS
ND<0.005
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
NS
NS
30.2
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
NS
NS
0.300
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
NS
NS.
ND<0.05
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
NS
NS
5.14
Sulfate
250
250
300
NS
NS
79.5
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
NS
NS
340
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
NS
NS
462
Total Hardness
(mg/L CaCO3)
500
NE
130.2
NS
NS
328
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
NS
NS
ND<1.00
Total Phenolics
0.001
NE
420.2
NS
NS
ND<0.05
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
NS
NS
18.6
Turbidity
NE
NE
SM214A
NS
NS
100
Notm
1- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Par( 700-706, for class GA groundwater.
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE=No1 Establlshed
Boldface type Indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards,
Units are in mgA unless otherwise stated
NS= Not sampled
CONRAI) GvOsctrNUls colli'.
W ^n Q
O
Ig -Vi T.
° z allu
°_ •+. < .
O
n
f
2 N N .2
0
a �
p. c�
31'o G
vd 4
L! S
Co
N P . Z{
w
x
a
i
_ :2
S11 , R
W
O �••)Lh ? L-
�F W
{'d.�t� 3av33 x�Gl NIYNJ � �'
Fu C1aS OV08 MRAIV r
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10955
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Report Date: 1/23/2002.
Re: Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 02010288
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No, 10854 Mass, License No. M-CF106 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA LD. No, CT00106
r
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORU CT 06906 (2031 325-13
, 71 FAX 12031 357-01 66
Page 1 of 3
Report Date: 1/23/2002
Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 02010288
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 01117102. The project was identifed as your project "CW000100 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
MW -9
York Sample ID
02010288-01
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
rn L
340
2.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m
82.2
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0.005
Potassium
SW846-6010
m L
5.14
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
30.2
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
rn L
0.300
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
rn
18.6
0.10
Iron
SW846-6010
mg/L
9.73
0.005
Lead
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0,005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m L
8.7
0.5
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m
0.94
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m
Not detected
0.05
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m
Not detected
10.0
Hardness, total
SM314B
m L CaCO3
328
1.0
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
m
79.5
0.2
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m L
462
0.5
YO-JIVDK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
MW -9
York Sample ID
02010288-01
Matrix
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m /L Not detected 1.0
Turbidity EPA 180.1
NTU 100 0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm; ug/L — ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm; ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 02010288
I. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Laboratories, Watertown, CT,
Approved By:
Robert Q. Ndley
Managing Qyectol
Page 3 of 3
Date: 1/23/2002
YORK
k
O �
VJ V
d
cr
LLI
U) Cl)
U
o
2
z rL z
d
Ea. �o
_ E Cf)
fuL
.Q
3
Q
to
D � �
Q -
a 0
o �
O
R > M c
4 1- 0 e V
F
rrrr a a e Z cl,
tion �
o
An z
�N
n
CI-
U) U)
L6LE 9 �5�� : .0h4 XUjj
rr
A
0
m
CONRAD GROSCIENC:E CORP.
Environmental.Soien ists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/454-2655
June 18, 2002
Andrew Lent
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2002, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File 9CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the second quarter of
2002 in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual
for the above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On May 30, 2002, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and the on-site supply
well were to be sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9, and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Samples from monitoring well PMW-8R were not collected for this round. Monitoring
well PMW-8R, once purged, did not produce a sufficient volume of water for sampling.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9), Well volumes for each well were calculated.
Groundwater was purged from Monitoring Well PMW-9 until all physical water quality
parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Well PMW-9 using a
dedicated polyethylene bailer and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for analysis of routine
parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Samples were collected from the
onsite supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the onsite supply shed.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
June 18, 2.002
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9: Iron and Sodium. All
results are presented in the attached tables. No other inorganic parameters exceeded NYSDEC
standards.
Supply Well SW -1
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in the supply well; Iron and
Manganese. No other inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standards.
All results are presented in the attached tables. Excerpts of the analytical report are
appended. A complete copy of the analytical report is on file with Conrad Geoscience.
Sampling for the 3 d Quarter of 2002 is tentatively scheduled for August 2002. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
EOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown, CPG
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONRAH GBOSCIENGM, Cow,. —
Table l.Groundwater Sampling Results - 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 2nd Quarter 2002,
samples collected May 30, 2002, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW001010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
. .........
PMW-8R
PMW-9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinkin
WateY
Routine Parameters
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
0,64
NS
0.72
Cadmium
0,010
0,005
6010
ND<0.005
NS
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
51.4
NIS
67,5
C.O,D.
NE
NE
410.4
ND<10,0
NS
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250
300
2.73
NS
9.76
Iron
0.300
0,300
6010
23,2
NS
0.359
Lead
0,.025
NE
6010
ND<0,005
NS
0.018
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
31.4
NS
34.5
Manganese
0,300
0.3
6010
0.423
INS
0.183
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
ND<0.05
NS
ND<0,05
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
5.17
NIS
5.11
Sulfate
250
250
300
46.6
NIS
59.3
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
350
NS
240
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
390
NS
300
Total Hardness
(mg/L CaCO3)
500
NE
130.2
257
NS
311
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
ND<1.00
INS
ND<1.00
Total Phenols
0-001
NE
420.2
ND<0.05
INS
ND<U5
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
18.3
INS
20.9
Turbidity
NE
NE
SM214A
1.3
INS
184
1- Groundwater standards as estabhshed in ONYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater.
-
2 Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are in mg/l unless otherwise stated
NS= Not sampled
YORK
ANALYTICAL LAH❑RAT❑RIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Report Date: 6/7/2002
Re: Client Project ID: CW00010
York Project No.: 02050716
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No. 10854 Mass, License No. M-CT106 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA I.D. No. CT00106
�e� .
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE 5TAMFORD, CT 06906 (Z03) 3Z5-1371 FAX 12031 357-0166
Page 1 of 3
Report Date: 6/7/2002
Client Project ID: CW00010
York Project No.: 02050716
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 05131102. The project was identifed as your project "CW00010 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
MW -9
SW -1
York Sample ID
02050716-01
02050716-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalini . -Total
SM403
m
L
240
20.0
350
10.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m
L
67.5
0.020
1 51.4
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m
L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
m
L
9.76
0.5
2.73
0.5
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m
Not detected
10.0
Not detected
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
ELL
0.359
0.005
23.2
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
rn L CaCO3
311
1.0
257
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
m
L
5.11
0.500
5.17
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
L
34.5
0.020
31.4
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m
L
0.183
0.005
0.423
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m
L
20.9
0.10
18.3
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m
L
0.72
0.05
0.64
0.05
Nitrate
EPA 300/SW9056
m
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Lead
SW846-6010
m
L
0.018
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.1/2
m
L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA 300
m
L
59.3
4,0
46.6
4.0
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m
L
300
0.5 1
390
0.5
YORK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
MW -9
SW -1
York Sample ID
02050716-01
02050716-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m L Not detected
1.0 Not detected LO
Turbidity EPA 180.1
NTU 184
1 0 1.3 0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/l. = ppm; ug/L = ppb For SoiIs/Solids: mg/kg � ppm ; ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 0205071.6
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project,
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that the TOC analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Laboratories; Watertown, CT.
Approved By: G
Robert . Brad y
Managing Director
Page 3 of 3
Date: 6/7/2002
PL
CID
0
0
flAt
ui
CL
E
Lli
co
Ct)
0
IOU
IOU
-ILL
2i
OL
E
0
C/)
O
cr
-Q
CL
CL
E
CL
E
co
U)
in
m
a)
4-
m
La w
0 El
IV)
1N
U
El Ll X
J
y
4)
w
w 0
LL
Z
.2t
in
> tl
0
.j
4
Z
0
in
co
U)
J CONRAD GwscJENCE CORP.
knvia onmPnta! Scientists
December 14, 2001
Andrew Lent
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, NcwYork 12603 • 8451454-2544 • fax! 845/454-2655
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Fourth Quarter 2001, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the fourth quarter of 2001
in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On October 29, 2001, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.1 l(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and the onsite supply
well were to be sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9 and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated, Monitoring
Well PMW-8R was purged dry three times to ensure sampling of representative formation water.
Groundwater was purged from Monitoring Well PMW-9 until all physical water quality
parameters had stabilized. Samples were collected from Monitoring Well MW -9 and MW -8R
using a dedicated polyethylene bailer and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for analysis of
routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Samples were collected
from the onsite supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the onsite supply shed.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
December 14, 2001
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well MW -8R
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in MW -8R; Iron, magnesium,
manganese, and sodium. Total hardness and total organic carbon also exceeded NYSDEC
standards. All results are presented in the attached tables.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9; Iron and Manganese. Total
organic carbon also exceeded the NYSDEC standard. All results are presented in the attached
tables.
Supply Well
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in the supply well; Iron, magnesium,
and sodium. Total organic carbon also exceeded the NYSDEC standard in the supply well. All
results are presented in the attached tables. A complete copy of the analytical report is attached.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sampling for the ls` quarter of 2002 has
been tentatively scheduled for February 2002.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
C.ONRA]) Gmso[f Ncu Com'. r
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
December 14, 2001
Page 3
Table 1, Groundwater Sampling Results -- 6 NYCRR Part 360 Routine Parameters; 4th Quarter
2001, samples collected October 29, 2001,
Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File 4CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit Method
Supply Well
MW -8R
MW -9
Class GA Drinking
Groundwater Water2
Ammonia
ND<0.05 0.786 1.07
2.0
NE
350.1
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
68.4
136
60.8
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
ND<10.0
ND<100
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250
300
3,50
26.6
9.55
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.349
7.10
19.3
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.006
0.007
ND<0.005
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
35.4
42.3
30.9
Manganese
0,300
0,3
6010
0.179
3.16
0.343
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
0.819
0.818
0.852
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
4.90
12.1
5.16
Sulfate
250
250
300
53.1
64.5
81.6
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
360
1840
280
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
462
84
424
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
316
515
279
(mg/L CaCO3)
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
5.2
6.6
8.2
Total Phenolics
0.001
NE
420,2
ND<0.10
ND<0.10
ND<0.10
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
21.7
26.8
18.1
Turbidity
NE
NE
SM214A
1.78
13,400
252
Notes:
1- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater,
2- Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE Not Established
Boldface We indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards,
Units are In mgA unless otherwise stated
CONRAD Gfosc.n,.Ncr. CORP. rag
1
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
k -3;f, i ,. ,N �' 2" ..
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Report Date: 11/9/2001
Re: Client Project ID: CW0000I0
York Project No.: 01100687
CT License No, PH -0723 New York License No. 10854 Mass. License No. M-CTI06 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA I.D. No. CT00106
acc,
h`..r an. ne
e�~.
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE 5TAMF❑RD, CT 06906 (203) 325-1371 FAX (203) 357-01 66
Page 1 of 3
Report Date: 11/9/2001
Client Project ID: CW000010
York Project No.: 01100687
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 10130101. The project was identifed as your project "CW000010 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NEI..AC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
sW-1
MW -9
York Sample ID
01100687-01
01100687-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
m
360
10.0
280
10.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
m /L
68.4
0.020
60.8
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Iron
SW846-6010
mgAL
0.349
0.005
19.3
0.005
Potassium
SW846-6010
m
4.90
0.500
5.16.
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
rn
35.4
0.020
30.9
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m
0.179
0.005
0.343
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m /L
21.7
0.10
18.1
0.10
Lead
SW846-6010
m
0.006
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
mgfL
3,50
1.0
9.55
lA
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m
Not detected
0.05 1
1.07
0.05
Nitrate
EPA300/SW9056
m
0.819
0.01
0.852
0.01
C.O.D.
SM 508E
m
Not detected
10.0
Not detected
10.0
Hardness total
SM314B
m /L CaCO3
316
1.0
279
1.0
Phenols Total
EPA 420.1/2
m /L
Not detected
0.10
Not detected
0.10
Sulfate
EPA375.3
m
53.1
1.0
81.6
1.0
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m
462
0.5
424
0.5
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
SW -1
MW -9
York Sample ID
01100687-01
01100687-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m /L it 5.2
1 1.0 8.2 1.0
Turbidity SM214A
NTU 1 1.78 J
0 252 0
Client Sample ID
MW -SR
York Sample ID
01100687-03
Matrix
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDI,
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
MRIL
1840
40.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
msi
136
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0.005
Iron
SW846-6010
m
7.10
0.005
Potassium
SW846-6010
MRA
1.2.1
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
42.3
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
m
3.16
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m /L
26.8
0.10
Lead
SW846-6010
m
0.007
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
Ina
26.6
1.0
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
TiL
0.786
0.05
Nitrate
EPA300/SW9056
m
0.818
0.01
C.O.D.
SM 508B
m
Not detected
100
Hardness total
SM314B
ma CaCO3
515
1.0
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
m
Not detected
0.10
Sulfate
EPA375.3
MEL
64.5
1.0
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
!ng&
84
0.5
Total Organic Carbon
SM50513
m
6.6
1.0
Turbidi
SM214A
NTU
13400
0
Units Key. For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm, ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm; ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 01100687
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
S. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. , It is noted that the Total Organic Carbon analyses reported herein were subcontracted to EAS Laboratories; Watertown, CT.
Approved By: � Date: 11/9/2001
Robert Q. Bra&y
Managing Direldtor
YORK
Page 3 of 3
Lal
c
t
d
OL
Lij
WCf
a
W
stea"
IV
a
W
C
a
O
Ft�♦���
a
/.4i\
�
~
�
E
E
o O
3zcl
o
x jCL
co
a�
Q O
E U)
f6
�
d
'a
N
'a
U
cr
a
CL.
E
o
I
o�
I
0
0
co
U
v
T
Z
�
Z
tm
Q
L�
,.
U
°
N14�olz
0
c
E
J.U)
` {` `
V
U
j Q o�
Com_
101
tj
J
Lel
LL
Q T^ o U
ITa`
3 O
~ ° z
o
o� Nlyfp
~ o
a
r
.4
A4
m
xrut mvka
U o
o
i nos OV08 aMW
°
f
a
t�
r
.4
A4
m
xrut mvka
U o
o
i nos OV08 aMW
°
C;ONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
049 Envaroramerata! Snentists
September 4, 2001
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 - 8451454-2544 - fax, 845/454-2655
BF—CF—IV ED
SEP, 0 5 2001
Andrew Lent N CLERK
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation TQ1iV
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Third Quarter 2001, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the third quarter of 2001
in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On August 14, 2001, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.1 l (d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and the onsite supply
well were to be sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9 and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated, Monitoring
Well PMW-8R was purged dry and did not recharge to allow for sampling. Groundwater was
purged from Monitoring Well PMW-9 until all physical water quality parameters had stabilized;
purging data is summarized on the attached sampling sheets. Samples were collected from
Monitoring Well MW -9 using a dedicated polyethylene bailer and shipped to York Analytical
Laboratories for analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
Samples were collected from the onsite supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the onsite
supply shed.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
September 4, 2001
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9; Iron, Sodium, and
Manganese. Total dissolved solids also exceed the NYSDEC standard in PMW-9. All results
are presented in the attached tables.
Supply Well
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in the supply well; Iron. No other
inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standard in the supply well. All results are presented
in the attached tables. Excerpts of the analytical report are appended. A complete copy of the
analytical report is on file with Conrad Geoscience.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBBlerb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
Commi:) GrosclENcc, Com .
Castle Point Landfill
File # C W000100
September 4, 2001
Page 3
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results - Routine Parameters; collected August 14, 2001,
Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
MW -9
Class GA
Groundwater'
Drinking
Watel`
Raufrrae Pa/�mQier
F'r,
aL'ai"T::"`J..`.a.0
' '
i,. ,t. .. .,• �a,�s
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
ND<0.05
0.409
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0,005
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
73.26
88.4
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
14
ND<10.0
Chloride
250
250
300
18.9
9.7
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
2.36
2.88
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.016
ND<0-005
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
35.0
30.5
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.601
0.229
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
0.897
0.835
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
4.70
4.53
Sulfate
250
250
300
51.0
82.9
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
370
400
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
508
552
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
327
346
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
ND0.0
ND<1.0
Total Phenolics
0.001
NE
420.2
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
31.7
19.4
Turbidity
NE
NE
SM214A
11.28
45.0
1- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-706, for class GA groundwater,
2 'Standards according to NYSI30H Subpart 5-1
NE=No1 Established
Boldface type Indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are In mgA unless otherwise stated
CONRAil t. cosc,IENCE CORP. � LAO ME �
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Report Date: 8/22/2001
Re: Client Project ID: CW00010
York Project No.: 01080377
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No. 10854 Mass. License No, M-CT106 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA I.D. No. CT00106
OWE RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORD, CT 06946 (203) 325-1371 FAX (203) 357-13166
Page I of 3
Report Date: 8/22/2001
Client Project ID: CW00010
York Project No.: 01080377
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 08/16/01. The project was identified as your project "CW00010 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
MW -9
SW -1
York Sample ID
01080377-01
01080377-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
E9L
400
2.0
370
2.0
Calcium
SW846-6010
MOIL
88.4
0.020
73.26
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
m
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
rn
9.7
1.0
18.9
1.0
C.O.D.
SM 508B
rn
Not detected
10.0
14
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
m
2.88
0.005
2.36
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
m CaCO3
346
1.0
327
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
T-ai
4.53
0.500
4.70
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
m
30.5
0.020
35.0
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
mPJL
0.229
0.005
0.601
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
m
19.4
0.10
31.7
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
m
0.409
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Nitrate
EPA300/SW9056
rn
0.835
0.01
0.897
0.01
Lead
SW846-6010
rn
Not detected
0.005 1
0.016
0.005
Phenols Total
EPA 420.1/2
rn /L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
Sulfate
EPA375,3
m /L
82.9
10.0
1
51.0
10.0
Total Dissolved Solids
EPA 160.1
m
552
0.5
508
0.5
YORK
Page 2 of 3
`CIient Sample ID
MW -9
SW -1
York Sample ID
01080377-01
01080377-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL Results MDL
Total Organic Carbon SM505B
m /L Not detected
1.0 Not detected 1.0
Turbidity SM214A
NTU 45.0
0 11.28 0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm ; ug/kg ; ppb
Notes for York Project No. 01080377
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that no analyses reported herein were subcontracted to another laboratory.
9
1
j
Approved By:q:1 xxji�
�
Robert Q. adley
Managing Director
Page 3 of 3
Date: 8/22/2001
YORK
r
^
c o
of
E
E
cli
i�
o
0
U
N
°J
❑
❑
N
co
a
VIZ
m
$
y
=
CO
o
U
o
E
cog
W
i
D
a
>
❑
I
n;Kj
:3
o
Z
Q
�q
4L
d
1
ILY
"Sy
{0
R
Q .O
'
✓
lk
EU)
r^
Sf>y
"m4' 35y,��:{
}
21
LZ
cr
> CO
cr
E
E
co
aR
co
0
S
p
cSo
E
E
Lo
o a
N
N q-11Ir
O
�a nx
m
LL
a
a fl
V11
a
°
y
6
!� J a f
Ire i H a
C
p O
O
Z
a
a
0
w
Q)
c/)
CL
'faE
n
X V.
o z
L
d W
`u C) 3ON3j NM17oNPdIiD
Hinos
.o
0
oeoa 83Ai8
P,
y�
a
z
w
00
rid �
I
�
Z
z
4
w�
z !!!
/o
0
Total Volume Purged/end purge �?-q Comments*
Purged Dry?
Sampled?'
C�NRAD
GEOSCIENCE
CORP.
Well Development Lag
PROJECT#
WELL LOCATION
MONITORING WELL
DATE 4F-4-61
^J ` 4
INITIALS
Total Depth
Depth to Water _
Water Column -
x Gallons per ft. Of Casing x
= Current Well Volume =
x3
X5 -
��, 6-7
�]
Z�, L
3 A
CasingDiameter
2"
ciF,1 4"
6"
Volume per Foot
0.163
0.653
1.469
TIME
pH
Conductivity
(MS/cm)
Turbidity
(NTU)
D.O.(mg/L)
T (°C)
Salinity
M
ORP
Gal
Purged
f ,? ,5
I c�j
C ;� ,-
Cry l
Total Volume Purged/end purge �?-q Comments*
Purged Dry?
Sampled?'
ONV09 JNI110nV 31V0
'anoge paaeoipui suoileudoidde aq; woad
pied paJ8pi0 pue panoidde si wielo sisal
1N3WAVd MO -A IVAOZ]ddV
TdIO1330 03ZMOH1nV
31V0
•aaaJJoa We s96Jeg3 pue paleIS
salep aqa uo fq!ledioiunw aq; o; pagsiwn} jo
pajapuaj ajaM slepejew Jo SaoIAiaS aAoge aql
IVAOUddV 1N3W12I'dd30
31111 38n1VNJIS 31`da
IOOZ/ti0/60
•anp Allenloe si pawielo;unowe aq} jegi pue 'papnpul;ou ale ')dwaxe s1 A}11edlolunw aql goigm woa;'saxel aega 'payslles jo pled uaaq seq lied
ou ;eql !pajejs sa}ep 941 uo figedlolunw eqj jo; ao of paaapuai aaaM p96Aego sjuawasingslP pue saowas 'swa}1 aq; ;eql :)oauoo pue aru; s(
$;o;unowe aq; ul jun000e anoge aqj aeq} /C11}rao�� u 'I
D '� u r
N011f/OlJllb30 S.1MdWIV 10
.......... -._.
09'�
�vlo1 i
og-m`i $ 11 pue? juiod opsua je �IuuopuoW njumpunoiD 1/1 08Zi I I00Z/b0/6
1NROWb 301Zld llNf) "'" """' "'
S3OIAii3S Zip SlV12i31VW HO NOIldlabS3tl �1111NVflb 31tltl
– ------------—�----- --__ -.....
........,...................._........_.. ON U3080V483
43—NSO2IiS039ismW M -0I-30 NOUV 0...d...l_-a—0
3SVH02nd 23H0nOA SIHl NO 03a31N3 IVi01 ONV-
63HOvJiV 3a ),VW S3010ANI 0311V13G
ON 10V2f1S6V NO 0383iN3 5S9Z'�S�IS�B � t bSZ'bSb/Sb8 'tid
£09Zi I.zoA, maN 'aisdaa3jq$nod ss3atltlV
-Viol onuand puowAug 8 ON'd
3w'dN
--......_ 'd-H0D HDMFIIDSOFID (I -dNOD SINVINIVnO
----------------1N3VUUVd3s7
._..__....._....--- -- 069ZI 31aoA maN `siiea siaiiuiddeM
1NnowV NOI1VWdO'dddV - aNnd pro -a gsngaippryg OZ
03AI3038 a3H0nOA 31V0 Haf)NIddv,%k d0 N?AOs
a3ewnN NV3aV SIHl NI311aM I i`I3H�f10/1
83H0nOA lON 04=1NVWIVIaL
09'£89`1.$ TP40 j,
O9'£89` I O9'£84`I
OUT 001 OOOMD
# aDIOANI # 01x3 DOS
I OOZ/t/6
d.LdQ
aZ)ToeuI
•2uiaol!uoW aa;pnnpunoiO iappno pituZ wnS dwnl
NoudR Dsaa L EIM alva
069Z AN `Siipd Sia2?u!ddpM
ppo-j tlSn4alpp!w
VU XOSOd
jo2urddpM jo umoj,
OZ 'TIIg
999Z-fgt/9t8 xpd
iTbSZ-1'S�/5i�8 auoud
£09ZI VOA MaN lalsdaaxuSnod
anuaAv PUOWXUN 8
'auoD n Naosoao QvuNoD
�J
�..:,. CaONRAD GiE (:)sCIkNCE CORP.
Environmental Scientists
s
July 11, 2001
Andrew Lent
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 8451454-2544 • fax: 8451454-2655
RECEIVED
JUL 13 2001
TOWN CLERK
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Comers Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2001, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York,
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the second quarter of
2001 in accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual
for the above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On June 5, 2001, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for baseline water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6). Two on-site monitoring wells and the onsite supply
well were to be sampled and analyzed; PMW-8R, PMW-9 and SW -1.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to
sample the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring
well utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to
the on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-SR, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated, Monitoring
Well PMW-8R was purged dry and did not recharge to allow for sampling. Groundwater was
purged from Monitoring Well PMW-9 until all physical water quality parameters had stabilized;
purging data is summarized on the attached sampling sheets. Samples were collected from
Monitoring Well MW -9 using a dedicated polyethylene bailer and shipped to York Analytical
Laboratories for analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
Samples were collected from the onsite supply well, SW -1, via the spigot inside the on-site
supply shed.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 11, 2001
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring WeII PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9; Iron and Manganese. Two
other inorganic parameters exceeds the NYSDEC standard in PMW-9; Color and Total Organic
Carbon. No VOCs were detected in PMW-9. All results are presented in the attached tables.
Supply Well
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in the supply well; Iron. No other
inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standard in the supply well. No VOCs were detected
in the supply well. All results are presented in the attached tables. Excerpts of the analytical
report are appended. A complete copy of the analytical report is on file with Conrad Geoscience
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
CONmi) G;Os(AEN(A. CORP. ' ►
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 11, 2001
Page 3
Table 1. Groundwater Sampling Results - Inorganic Compounds; collected June 5, 2001,
Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
MW -9
Class GA Drinkin
Groundwater' WaV
lnorganrc Compounds
W.
Aluminum
NE
NE
6010
2.09
0.554
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
1.12
0.419
Antimony
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.008
ND<0.008
Arsenic
0.025
0.05
6010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
BOD
NE
NE
405,1
5
37
Beryllium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.001
ND<0.001
Boron
1.00
NE
6010
0.674
0.220
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
73.1
107
C.O.D.
NE
NE
410.4
ND<10.0
46
Chloride
250
250.00
300
3.59
9.88
Chromium
0.050
0.10
6010
0.006
0.007
Color (Pt/CI)
15 PVCI
15 Pt/CI
1110.2
5
50
Copper i
0.200
NE
6010
0.086
0.021
Hexavalent Chromium
0.050
NE
7196A
ND<0.01
0.020
Iron
0.300
0.300
6010
0.351
23.7
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.007
0,011
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
33.3
30.3
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
0.184
0.431
Mercury
0.002
0.002
6010
ND<0.0002
ND<0.0002
Nickel
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.009
0.020
Nitrate
10.0
10.0
300
1.03
0.842
NE
NE
6010
4.11
-:Potassium
4.85
CoNRAD Gil oSCIICNcl' CORP.['1109
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 11, 2001
Page 4
Table 1. (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results — Inorganic Compounds; collected June 5,
2001, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Limit
Method
Supply Well
MW -9
Clas GA t
Groundwater
Drinkin
Wate
l{organfo Compounds
Sulfate
250
250
300
50.6
82,9
Thallium
NE
NE
6010
ND<0.010
ND<0,010
Total Alkalinity
Total Cyanide
NE
0.100
NE
NE
310.1
335.4
350
ND<0.01
350
ND<0.01
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
450
485
Total Hardness
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
500
NE
NE
NE
130.2
351.2
320
1.37
391
2,28
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
3.4
17.0
Total Phenolics
0.001
NE
420.2
Nb<0A5
ND<0.05
Zinc
0.300
5.0
6010
0.027
0.132
Selenium
10
0.01
6010
ND<0.010
ND<0.010
Silver
0.050
0.05
6010
ND<0.003
ND<0.003
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
18.9
19.4
1- Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater.
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
Units are in mgll unless otherwise stated
CO NRAD GFXACIJsN E CORP.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CWOOO100
July 11, 2001
Page 5
Table 2 Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA Method
8260; collected June 5, 2001, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC
Limit'
Supply Well MW -9
Volatile Organlc.Compounds
Acetone
20
ND<10.0
N D<10.0
Benzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromochloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromodichloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
Bromoform
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
2-Butanone (MEK)
10
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
Carbon Tetrachloride
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloroform
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Chloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5
ND<1.D
ND<1.0
Dibromochloromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dibromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Dibromomethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 4 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
NDc1.0
1, 1-Dichioroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloroelhane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 2-Dichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Cis -1, 3-Dichloropropene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Ethylbenzene
5
ND0.0
ND<1.0
CoN-Rm) Groscrnr jcl; Com'. 51
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
July 11, 2001
Page 6
Table 2 (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA
Method 8260; collected June 5, 2001, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
New York
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC
Limit'
Supply Well
MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Methylene Chloride
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK)
10
ND<5.0
ND<5.0
Styrene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 2, 2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
ND<1.o
ND<1.0
1, 1, 1, 2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Tetrachloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Toluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1, 1, 2 -Trichloroethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Trichloroethene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Trichlorofluoromethane
5
ND<1.o
ND<1.0
1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Vinyl Chloridez
5
ND<1,0
ND<1.0
M+P-Xylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
0 -Xylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,1-Dichloroethylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,1-Dichloropropylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
50
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1,3-Dichloropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
CONRAI) Gl]OSCai,.NGE Cold'.
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW0001.00
July It, 2001
Page 7
Table 2 (cont'd) Groundwater Sampling Results -Volatile Organic Compounds via USEPA
Method 8260; collected June 5, 2001, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
New York
Conrad Geoscience File #CW00010
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC
Limit'
Supply Well
MW -9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Dichlorodifluoromethane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Isopropylhenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
Napthalene
10
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
n-Butylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
n -Propyl benzene
5
ND<1.0
N D<1,0
p-Isopropyltoluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
sec-Butylbenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
tert-Butyl benzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
trans-l,3-Dichloropropylene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
2-Hexanone
NE
ND<5,0
ND<5,0
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
4-Chlorotoluene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
Bromobenzene
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
1-Chlorohexane
50
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
2,2-Dichioropropane
5
ND<1.0
ND<1,0
2-Chlorotoluene
Nnrnc-
5
ND<1.0
ND<1.0
' - Groundwater standards as established in 6NYCRR Part 700-705, for class GA groundwater.
2 — Drinking water standard established in NYSDOH Subpart 5-1.
NE=Not Established
Boldface type indicates those parameters which exceed NYSOEC standards.
Units are In ugA unless otherwise slated
CONItAI) Gt? sc ii,.,NC;i: Coltf'.
YORK
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Report Date: 6/14/2001
Re: Client Project ID: CWOOOIO
York Project No.: 01060115
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No. 10854 Mass, License No. M -CTI 06 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA I. D. No. CT00106
. ... _ ..
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORD, CT 136906 (203) 325-1371 FAX (203) 357-01 66
Page 3 of 5
Report Date: 5/14/2001
Client Project 1D: CW00010
York Project No.: 01060115
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Nicholas Sturdivant
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 06106/01. The project was identifed as your project "CW00010 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
Supply Well
MW -9
York Sample ID
01060115-01
01060115-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Volatiles -8260 list SW846-8260
u /L ---
---
---
---
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1 1-Dichloroeth lene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
I,I-Dichloropr2pylene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,3-Trichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1 2 3-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2,4-Trimeth ]benzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloro ro ane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1 2-Dibromoethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
YORK
Page 2 of 5
Client Sample ID
Supply Well
MW-9
York Sample ID
01060115-01
01060115-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter Method
Units Results
MDL
Results
MDL
1,2-Dichloroeth leve Total
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,3 5-Trimeth lbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
1,3-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
1-Chlorohexane
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
2,2-Dichloro ro ane
Not detected
I
Not detected
i
2-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
4-Chlorotoluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Benzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Bromobenzene
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
Bromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Bromodichloromethane
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
Bromoform
Not detected
I
Not detected
i
Bromomethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Chlorobenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Chloroethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Chloroform
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Chloromethane
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Dibromochloromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Dibromomethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Eth lbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
.Isopropylbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Methylene chloride
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Naphthalene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
n-Butylbenzene
Not detected
I
Not detected
I
n-Propylbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
o-X lene
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
- & m-X lens
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
p-Isopropyltoluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
see-Butylbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Styrene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
tert-But lbenzene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Tetrachloroethylene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Toluene
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
trans- l,3-Dichloro ro lene
Not detected
I
Not detected
1
Trichloroethylene
Not detected
1
Not detected
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Vinyl chloride
Not detected
1
Not detected
I
Ketones, target list SW846-8260
a /L ---
---
---
---
2-Butanone MEK
Not detected
5.0
Not detected
5.0
2-Hexanone
Not detected
5.0
Not detected
5.0
Acetone
Not detected
10.0
Not detected
10.0
Methyl iso bu 1 ketone MIBK
Not detected
5.0
Not detected
5.0
Metals, Priority Pollutant List EPA SW846
mg/,L ---
---
---
---
Antimon
Not detected 1
0.008
Not detected
0.008
YORK
Page 3 of 5
Client Sample ID
York Sample ID
Matrix
Parameter
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Aluminum
kalinity-Total
Boron
B.O.D.5-da
Calcium
Chloride
Cyanide, total
C.O.D.
Color
.)mium, hexavalent
Iron
[hardness, total
Potassium
Sodium
Ammonia
Nitrate
Phenols, Total
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitroger
Total Organic Carbon
Method
SW846-6010
SM403
SW846-6010
EPA 405.1
SW846-6010
EPA300/SW9056
EPA 335.2
SM 508B
SM2120B
EPA 218.4
SW846-6010
SM314B
SW -7470
SW846-6010
SW846-6010
SW846-6010
SW846-6010
EPA300/SW9056
EPA300/SW9056
EPA 420.112
EPA375.3
SM
SM420A
SM505B
SM214A
Units
Pt -Co units
CaCO3
NTU
Supply Well
01060115-01
WATER
Results
Not detected
Not detected
Not detected
0.006
0.086
0.007
Not detected
Not detected
Not detected
Not detected
0,027
2.09
350
0,674
5
73.1
3.59
Not detected
Not detected
5
Not detected
0.351
320
Not detected
4.11
33.3
0.184
18.9
1.12
1.03
Not detected
50.6
450
1.37
3.4
1
MDL
0.010
0.001
0.003
0.005
0.006
0.003
0.009
0,010
0.003
0.010
0.006
0.010
2.0
0.020
1.0
0.020
1.0
0.01
10.0
1
0.01
0,005
1.0
0.0002
0,500
0,020
0.005
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.05
10.0
0.5
0.10
1.0
0
MW -9
01060115-02
WATER
Results
Not detected
Not detected
Not detected
0.007
0.021
0.011
0.020
Not detected
Not detected
Not detected
0.132
0.554
350
0.220
37
107
9.88
Not detected
46
50
0.02
23.7
391
Not detected
4.65
30.3
0.431
19.4
0.419
0.842
Not detected
82.9
485
2.28
17.
183
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L = ppm ; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids; mg/kg = ppm ; ug/kg = ppb
Page 4 of 5
MDL
0.010
0.001
0.003
0.005
0.006
0.003
0.009
0.010
0.003
0.010
0.006
0.010
2.0
0.020
1.0
0.020
1.0
0.01
10.0
1
0.01
0.005
1.0
0.0002
0.500
0.020
0.005
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.05
10.0
0.5
0.10
1.0
0
YORK
Report Date: 6/14/2001
Client Project ID: CW00010
York Project No.: 01060115
Notes for York Project No. 01060115
1. The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that no analyses reported herein were subcontracted to another laboratory.
Approved By:
Robert Q. Bi
Managing D
.i4.1 Date: 6/14/2001
Page 5 of 5
YORK
E
com
0
b
m
m
CL
E
m
E
E_
t
po
0
a
m
�
2
C
'm
N
C
•m
N
CL
C/),
0
4D
E
E
o
v
co
o
a
LL
yc
z
avi
Q
Q
a
.m
a
�
d
o
m
,c
m
V
U
w
z
a
r �
�+ w
v $
a
o-
a
z
zi
q
x71-
�i
d tl � 0
Cal)30N3j NNlI
/y
NfVH3 �4r
�
fi
UP
o
O
ti{Inos
f
QV08 N3AI !
,CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
�;nvirarrrnerrtir! b'rir�ntisis
July 9, 2001
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd., 5 I Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
8 Raymond Avenue, Voughkccpie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/4542655
Re: Gas Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2001; Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger,
Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000 100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the December 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCMMP).
On June 22, 2001, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (OZ) from 15 gas vents around
the perimeter of the landfill. Measurements were also collected in and around nearby structures.
Sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill gas monitoring.
Measurements were taken within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these vents if methane
was detected inside.
Of the 15 vent locations monitored, none had detectable concentrations of methane above the
vent pipe.
Nine vents had detectable concentrations of methane within the gas vent. Five of these vents
exhibited values in excess of 25% of the LEL (GV -1, GV-8,'GV-17, GV -4, and GV -3). Each of
these locations also had detectable concentrations of methane at the vent opening.
0 LEL readings in the on-site building and gazebo were 0.0%.
Castle Point Landfill
#CW000100
June 9, 2001
Page 2
Data from all gas monitoring points are presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring
for the third quarter has been tentatively scheduled for August 2001. If you have any questions or
comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
attachments
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paggi w/ attachments
Gc»ianu Geoscwtvc.aa Caii,.
�ILQ-�
C:IMY DOCUMENTWONRAD GEOSCIENCMCW00010011.ANDFILL GAS M0NIT0R1NQGASM0NIT2NDQ200LD0C
Castle Point Landfill
#CW000100
June 9, 2001
Page 3
Date:
June 22, 2001
29.90"Hg
Project#
CW000100 - 2"" Q 2001 Gas Monitoring
NSS
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH4
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 - above
29.90
0
0
20.9
1245
GV -1 - inside
29.90
5+
100+
5.4
1245
GV -1 - below
29.90
0.05
1
20.8
1245
GV -2 - inside
29.90
0.2
4
14.5
1225
GV -5 - inside
29.90
0
0
20.9
1220
GV -6 - inside
29.90
0
0
20.9
1148
GV -7 - inside
29.90
0.8
16
19.8
1155
GV -8 - above
29.90
0
0
2.9
1255
GV -8 - inside
29.90
5+
100+
13.2
1255
GV -8 - below
29.90
1.29
39
19.2
1255
GV -11 -inside
29.90
0
0
20.9
1205
GV -12 - inside
29.90
0
0
20.9
1208
GV -13 - inside
29.90
0.05
1
19.6
1214
GV -15 - inside
29.90
0
0
20.9
1200
GV -16 - inside
29.90
0
0
19.9
1211
GV -17 -above
29.90
0
0
20.9
1249
GV -17 - inside
29.90
5+
100+
1.1
1249
GV -17 - below
29.90
0.4
8
20.2
1249
PV -1
29.90
0
0
20.9
1140
PV -2
29.90
0
0
20.9
1213
Gazebo
29.90
0
0
20.9
1300
Building
29.90
0
0
20.9
1303
t:VMMtN 1,j
Exceedences of the %LEL are bolded
CONRAD Gif oBCII?NC7i Come.
OWY DOCUMLNTSICONRAD GEOSCIENCL1CW000iMLANDFILL GAS MONITORINOIGASMONIT2NDQ2001.DOC
Castle Point Landfill
#CW000100
June 9, 2001
Page 4
Date:
June 22, 2001
29.90"Hg
Project#
CW000100 - 2nd Q 2001 Gas Monitoring
NSS
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches Hg
H4
%LEL
%02
Fime%C
GV-4 — inside
29.90
5+
100+
11.4
1230
GV -4 - below
29.90
1.25
25
18.1
1230
GV -9
29.90
0
0
20.9
1236
GV -3 — inside
29.90
4.5
90
0.6
1240
GV -3 — below
29.90
0.55
11
16.4
1240
I:VMMt[N I J
Exceedences of the %LEL are bolded
CiONRM) GI,,Osc bNc1; CORP.
C:IMY DOCUMBNWCONPAD GS0SCWNCIIICW0WI001ANDAILL GAS MONPCORINGIGASM0NMNDQ2001.DOC Ira
CONRAD GwscIENC E CORP.
i?'nvarnrxnrend�xl �'cir,ntists
May 31, 2001
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd., 5"' Floor
Tarrytown, New York 10591-5805
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/4542655
FIECEIVED
JUN! 0 -k 2901
TOWN CLERK
Re: 1$t Quarter 2001 Gas Monitoring Report, Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance
Program; Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the April 2000 Post -Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Program (PCMMP).
On March 30, 2001, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (02) from 14 gas vents around
the perimeter of the landfill (see attached site map). Measurements were also collected in and around
nearby structures.
Sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill gas monitoring.
Measurements were taken within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these vents if
methane was detected inside.
Of the 14 vent locations monitored, none had detectable concentrations of methane above the
vent pipe.
Five vents had detectable concentrations of methane within the gas vent. One of these vents
exhibited values in excess of 25% of the LEL (GV -17). This location had detectable
concentrations of methane at the vent opening.
LEL readings in the on-site building and gazebo were 0.0%.
Castle Point Landfill
#CW000100
May 31, 2001
Page 2
Data from all gas monitoring points are presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring
for the second quarter has been tentatively scheduled for June 2001. If you have any questions or
comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
attachments
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter .Paggi w/ attachments
GON1L\I) CORP.C:WY DOCUMENTSICONRAD G84SCIENCMCW00WMLANDFILL GAS MONITORWGIGASMON[T1STQ200l.WPDON I
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Page 1 of I
Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
March 30, 2001
29.70"Hg
Project#
CW000100 - 1st Q 2001 Gas Monitoring
NSS
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches H
%CH
%LEL
%O
Time
GV -1 - above
29.70
0
0
20.9
1133
GV -1 - inside
1,2
24
17.3
1130
GV -1 - below
0.05
1
20.1
1132
GV -2 - inside
29.70
0
0
20.2
1053
GV -5 - inside
29.70
0
0
20.5
1050
GV -6 - inside
29.70
0
0
20.2
1158
GV -7 - inside
29.70
0.6
12
18.1
1154
GV -8 - above
29.70
0
0
21.0
1147
GV -8 - inside
0.9
18
17.1
1145
GV -8 - below
0
0
20.8
1146
GV -11 - inside
29.70
0
0
20.9
1030
GV -12 - inside
29.70
0
0
21.0
1034
GV -13 - inside
29.70
0
0
21.1
1045
GV -15 - inside
29.70
0
0
19.6
1150
GV -16 - inside
29.70
0
0
21.1
1037
GV -17 -above
29.70
0
0
20.0
1143
GV -17 - inside
1.7
34
16.7
1140
GV -17 - below
0
0
20.0
1141
PV -1
29.70
0
0
21.2
1102
PV -2
29.70
0
0
20.9
1040
Gazebo
29.70
0
0
21.3
1202
Building
29.70
0
1 0
20.0
1210
COMMENTS
Exceedences of the %LEL are WIded
AEncalcWyDocumemsTommdGeoscicrxlMOWIO andfillGasMonitotm&\CmsMomtlstQZ00t,wpd
CONRAD GE-OSCIEINCE CORP.
sts
May 23, 2001
I -Ion. Constance Smith
Town Supervisor
Town of Wappinger
PO Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
8 Raymond Avenue, Pouglikeepsic, New Yofk 12603 - 845/454-2544 * fiax: 845/454-2655
R
- f
C E V E
S1.xf'8-1 - A
FOVV�j
WA P
Re: Quarterly Monitoring, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CWOOO 100
Dear Supervisor Smith:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has performed quarterly groundwater and landfill gas
monitoring for the Castle Point Landfill since the inception of the monitoring program in
June 2000. This work has been conducted under the supervision of Paggi, Martin &
DelBenc and in accordance with the December 2000, NYSDEC approved, Post -Closure
Monitoring and Maintenance Manual.
Conrad Geoscience is prepared to continue providing these services at the rates
established in our original response to the Town's request for proposals in January 2000.,
Quarterly landfill gas monitoring will be conducted for $1,923.00 per year and
groundwater monitoring will be conducted for $6,734.00 per year.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
cc: Peter Paggi — Paggi, Martin & De]Bene
C,()N12AI) GEOSCIENCE CORP
Environmental Srimlisls
April 20, 2001
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 - 845/454-2544 - fax: 845/454-2655
RRC�11 ...
D
Andrew Lent Ary
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road roWiliL'
New Paltz, New York 12561 REC
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2001, Castle Point Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the first quarter of 2001
in accordance with the 1999 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the above
referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On April 3, 2001 Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.1 l(d)(6). Three on-site monitoring wells were to be sampled
and analyzed; PMW-8, PMW-9, and SW -1.
Monitoring well PMW-8R is a 27' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized to sample
the unconsolidated sediment aquifer. PMW-9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring well
utilized to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to the
onsite facilities,
Samples from supply well SW -1 were not collected for this round. This well is turned off
during the winter months.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (PMW-8R, PMW-9). Well volumes for each well were calculated and CGC
personnel purged three well volumes from PMW-8R before sampling to ensure sampling of
representative formation water. Groundwater was purged from PMW-9 until all physical water
quality parameters had stabilized. Physical water quality parameters were monitored for both
wells during purging and are summarized on the attached sampling sheets. Samples were
collected from Monitoring Well MW -9 and Monitoring Well MW -8R using dedicated
polyethylene bailers and shipped to York Analytical Laboratories for analysis of routine
parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
C:Wy DxumentsWomd Ce knu CWi]pOli)"udwaler Mo taringUsl quarter gmndw-tu report2001.wpd
Castle Point Landfill
File # CW000100
April 20, 2001
Page 2
RESULTS
Monitoring Well PMW-9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-9; Iron and Manganese. One
other inorganic parameter exceeds the NYSDEC standard in PMW-9; Total Organic Carbon. All
results are presented in the attached tables.
Monitoring Well PMW-8R
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in PMW-8R; Iron, Sodium, Magnesium, and
Manganese. Three other inorganic parameter exceed the NYSDEC standard in PMW-8R; Total
Organic Carbon, Total Hardness, and Total Dissolved Solids. All results are presented in the
attached tables. Excerpts of the analytical report are appended. A complete copy of the
analytical report is on file with Conrad Geoscience
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin & DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments
C:VNy lbnuncnMc.... d Geos 1—eYCW0001001G.und"1c, Mont ing1kt q—w ground—i rtpo 2001 -pd [
CoNmi) Gi[.osclE.Nca, G ikv.
AN
Castle Point Landfill
File # C W000100
April 20, 2001
Page 3
Table 1 Groundwater sampling results SW -1, PMW-8 and PMW-9- Part 360 Routine
Parameters; collected April 3, 2001 at Castlepoint Landfill, Town of Wappinger, New
York;
Conrad Geoscience File # CW000100
Chemical Constituent NYSDEC
Limit
Class GA Drinking
Groundwater' Water2
Method # PMW-8
SW -1
PMW-9
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
0,747
NS
1.20
BOD -5
NE
NE
405.1
29
NS
ND<1.0
Bromide
NE
NE
300
1.19
NS
ND<0.1
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
ND<0.005
NS
ND<0.005
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
154
NS
80.7
Chemical Oxygen Demand
NE
NE
410.4
51
NS
ND<10
Chloride
250
250
300
39.9
NS
9.68
Iron
0.300
0.3
6010
2.39
NS
14.7
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
ND<0.005
NS
ND<0.005
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
42.1
NS
30.6
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
2.46
NS
.360
Nitrate Nitrogen
10.0
10
300
3.37
NS
0.809
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
10.8
NS
4.45
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
26.4
NS
19.3
Sulfate
250
250
300
109
NS
82.4
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
480
NS
320
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
636
NS
356
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
558
NS
328
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
351.2
1.38
NS
1.01
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
5.5
NS
3.5
Total Phenolics
0.001
t -.NE
420.2
ND10,05
NS
ND<0.05
Notes:
1 - Standards according to 6NYCRR Part 700-705;
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
ND = Not detected, detection limit listed;
J=estimated value;
B=compound found in blank;
All concentrations are in ppm (mglL) unless otherwise indicated;
NE=Not Established;
NS= Not Sampled;
Boldface indicated those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
C:wy DocumrntsNca dCe ie CW000100M7rmMwater Monitoring] st quarter vowidwaw report 200i,wpd
GONRnI) Gi[ osc1FNCR CORP. !
C,ONRAD
GEOSCYENCE
CORP.
Well Development Lo
PROJECT # CW000100
WELL LOCATION S side of LF near fence
MONITORING WELL PMW8(R) _
DATE 413101 INITIALS NSS
Total Depth
Depth to Water -
Water Column =
x Gallons per ft. Of Casing x
= Current Well Volume -
x3 =
x5 -
27'
19.86
7.14
1.16
3.48
5.70
Casing Diameter
2"
4"
6"
Volume per Foot
0.163
0.653
1.469
TIME
pH
Conductivity
(mSlcm)
Turbidity
(NTU)
D.O.(mg/L)
T (°C)
ORP
Salinity(%)
Gal
Purged
1500
6.23
1.07
0
4.66
14.9
-3
0.04
1
1530
6.80
1.06
0
4.76
12.3
-20
0.04
2
1550
6.78
1.05
0
4.51
15.0
-13
0.04
3
1623
6.72
1.06
0
4.63
14.9
-18
0.04
4
Total Volume Purged/end purge 4
Purged Dry? No
Sampled? Yes
Comments:
CoNRA7) Gaoscrr.Ncis Cf)izr,. 1�0
CONRAD
GEOSCIENCE
CORP. Well Development Lo
PROJECT # CW000100 MONITORING WELL PMW-9
WELL LOCATION S side of LF closer to road DATE 413101 INITIALS NSS
Total Depth
Depth to Water
Water Column
x Gallons per ft. Of Casing
= Current Well Volume
x3
X5
TIME I pH
1570
7.31
1535
7.30
1600
7.43
1625
7.50
1640
7.58
1646
7.55
11706
7.62
59.6
- 13'
46,6
x
= 7.59
= 22.78
- 37.98
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
Turbidity
(NTU)
.359
250
.359
46
.357
75
.339
160
.345
130
.385
87
.399
0
Casing Diameter
2„
A 4"
6"
Volume per Foot
0.163
0.653
1.469
D.O.(mg/L)
T (°C)
ORP
Salinity(%)
Gal
Purged
2.30
13.0
-35
0.02
1.5
2.15
12.4
-34
0.01
2.5
2.50
13.1
48
0.01
3.5
2.28
13.2
-34
0A1
4
3.58
12.9
-39
0.01
6
3.49
13.4
-42
0.01
8
3.59
12.9
-46
0.01
10
Total Volume Purged/end purge 16 Comments:
Purged Dry? No
Sampled? Yes
CONRAO Gi oscu,.Na; CORP.
-^-�•-�,�
APPROXIMATE PROPERTY Llp!•��� E �ryP�—rte
N -T Tx
.�
€
�([�,j�4(lf4�Ijy[I1j��,11�1�
yam, ��e
9'�
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY [
PRoPpsE RELOCAYEo 40CA1i0N —��___
PMW - 3
1
�®
'wsnRc WCAnaR
EMSTMC WELL
GRA4EL �RlI�Sy�Y
AV
x
Y
a CV -2 eo6ip�,�iBENCHMARXf
i
R
CV -1
J BALLFIELO
/
i
Ir
W -4
riot ro �
CR2��o
'rE5•f1irD
Q-1
z
CV -13
4
ERi1►IC GS W.NT (nv)
cv a
A
cv_g
!
z
l�
R
NOT TO W
GV -6
A
cv_16
PYIY - S
a prp • wm
A
A
GV -12
.nx
GV -7
GV -I1
*
7REELINE
(TVP.}
CV -IS
w y y
'
PROPFRTM `"IE (TR.
-
ot,m UWFE,�rm)
. . AppRU,71U,Ti
-not Aft
! �
�l-°
y�}
_ e1
/4pww ppw1' BL
a4aa vw sirAS
YORK
ANALYTICAL LASORAT❑RIES, INC.
Technical Report
prepared for
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Chris Brown
Report Date: 4/16/2001
Re: Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 01040109
CT License No. PH -0723 New York License No. 10854 Mass. License No. M-CT106 Rhode Island License No. 93 EPA I.D. No. CT00106
,,-helacne a
ONE RESEARCH DRIVE STAMFORD, CT 06906 (20 31 325-13'71 FAX (203) 357-0166
Pagel of 3
Report Date: 4/16/2001
Client Project ID: CW000100
York Project No.: 01040109
Conrad Geoscience
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 10965
Attention: Chas Brown
Purpose and Results
This report contains the analytical data for the sample(s) identified on the attached chain -of -custody
received in our laboratory on 04104101. The project was identifed as your project "CW000100 ".
The analyses were conducted utilizing appropriate EPA, Standard Methods, and ASTM methods as detailed
in the data summary tables .
All samples were received in proper condition meeting the NELAC acceptance requirements for
environmental samples except those indicated under the Notes section of this report.
All the analyses met the method and laboratory standard operating procedure requirements except as
indicated under the Notes section of this report, or as indicated by any data flags, the meaning of which is
explained in the attachment to this report, if applicable.
The results of the analyses, which are all reported on an as -received basis unless otherwise noted, are
summarized in the following table(s).
Analysis Results
Client Sample ID
MW -8R
MW -9
York Sample ID
01040109-01
01040109-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Alkalinity -Total
SM403
mg/L
480
2.0
320
2.0
B.O.D.(5-day)
EPA 405.1
mg/L
29
1.0
Not detected
1.0
Bromide
EPA300/SW9056
mg/1
1.19
0.1
Not detected
0.1
Calcium
SW846-6010
mg/L
154
0.020
80.7
0.020
Cadmium
SW846-6010
mg/L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Chloride
EPA300/SW9056
mg/L
39.9
1.0
9.68
1.0
C.O.D.
SM 508B
mg/L
51
10.0
Not detected
10.0
Iron
SW846-6010
mg/L
2.39
0.005
14.7
0.005
Hardness, total
SM314B
mg/L CaCO3
558
1.0
328
1.0
Potassium
SW846-6010
mg/L
10.8
0.500
4.45
0.500
Magnesium
SW846-6010
mg/L
42.1
0.020
30.6
0.020
Manganese
SW846-6010
mg/L
2.46
0.005
0.360
0.005
Sodium
SW846-6010
mg/L
26.4
0.10
19.3
0.10
Ammonia
EPA300/SW9056
mg/L
0.747
0.05
1.20
0.05
Nitrate
EPA3001SW9056
m91L
3.37
0.01
0.809
0.01
Lead
SW846-6010
mg/L
Not detected
0.005
Not detected
0.005
Phenols, Total
EPA 420.112
mg/L
Not detected
0.05
Not detected
0.05
YORK
Page 2 of 3
Client Sample ID
MW -8R
MW -9
York Sample ID
01040109-01
01040109-02
Matrix
WATER
WATER
Parameter
. Method
Units
Results
MDL
Results
MDL
Sulfate
EPA375.3
mg/L
109
10.0 1
82.4
10.0
Total Dissolved Solids
SM
mg/L
636
0.5
356
0.5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
SM420A
mg/L
1.38
0.10
1.01
0.10
Total Organic Carbon
SM505B
mg/L
5.5
1.0
3.5
1.0
Units Key: For Waters/Liquids: mg/L'— ppm; ug/L = ppb For Soils/Solids: mg/kg = ppm; ug/kg = ppb
Notes for York Project No. 01040109
1, The MDL (Minimum Detectable Limit) reported is adjusted for any dilution necessary due to the levels of target and/or non -
target analytes and matrix interference.
2. Samples are retained for a period of thirty days after submittal of report, unless other arrangements are made.
3. York's liability for the above data is limited to the dollar value paid to York for the referenced project.
4. This report shall not be reproduced without the written approval of York Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
5. All samples were received in proper condition for analysis with proper documentation.
6. All analyses conducted met method or Laboratory SOP requirements.
7. It is noted that no analyses reported herein were subcontracted to another laboratory.
tt
Approved By:
Robert Q. B a ley
Managing Dtrhctor
Page 3 of 3
Date: 4/16/2001
YORK
M
04/05/01 THU 13:44 FAX 9144542655 CGC
d
r
CL
1
N
N
m
r;
mr�.�'
U �
v
Q
O
v
z
E
LU
Wof4
All -
LU
DI
W
V)
r
z
kt.
Q
to
w •i
m
IUD
l
�0
i
Q
�y
IQL
o
Com`;
U%
o
�
co
z
S
CL
E
r
[A 001
LeC;ONRAD GFOSGILNCE CORP.
Environmental ,Scientists 8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/454-2655
RECEIVED
FEB 15 2001
TOWN CLERK
February 13, 2001
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd. 5" Floor
Tarrytown, NY 10591-5805
Re: Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Program
4" Quarter Gas Monitoring Report, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent;
Conrad Geoscience has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the April 2000 Post Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Program (PCMMP).
On December 20, 2000, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane
(CHQ), percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), and percentage of oxygen (02) from 14 gas
vents around the perimeter of the landfill (See attached site map). Measurements were also
collected in and around nearby structures.
Sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved procedure for landfill gas monitoring.
Measurements were taken within the vents, and above and beneath the opening of these vents if
methane was detected inside.
Of the 14 vent locations monitored, none had detectable concentrations of methane above
the vent pipe.
Three vents had detectable concentrations of methane within the gas vent. Two of these
vents exhibited values in excess of 25% of the LEL (GV -17 and GV -8). Each of these
locations had detectable concentrations of methane at the vent opening.
11&ioalc\My ➢ocumentsTonrad Gooseience1CW600I Oftandril! Gas MoaUaring\GasMonit41bQ2000,wpd
Castle Point Landfill
#CW000100
February 13, 2001
Page 2
LEL readings in the on-site building and gazebo were 0.0%.
Data from all gas monitoring points is presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring
for the first quarter has been tentatively scheduled for February 2001. 1f you have any questions
or concerns please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
attachments
cc: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paggi w/ attachments
Mricak\My Wcum nls\Conrad Gcoscience1CW0001MILandfill Gas Monilorin&\GasMonll4thQ2000.wpd
CaoNRAU GI.osciENCE CORP.
APPROMMATE PRCPkRTY LINE
(TYP.)
OF Tb (�
T
d��`+5'��''��'��}�ll1�++''{{{'����
�. _ '
NQ
PPRoAa� RFLOCYAQIl.
Lcc rnaN
T�
snNc LOCATION
S
`I' EwS�nNc M1ELL
- rwaw
0"7
�a �RI'4EWtir TVP.
n
N+
- Iw
a RENCHMARKi
cV-2
z
.
e
I°0.0
1 BALLFIELD
r�
��
O
c5 v-
tF.-Afe.
V-3
$/ CA4190
o TEST>r�i7
CV -{3
r
4
EY14flNC GAS YFHT {TrrJ
W `'V•e
1
�
tl -9
_
1U
1410T TO M
c+r d
A
T�ST�D
cV-1d
nov a rawc . nm
vrn . um
'
TREELINE
A
OV-7
.
CV-{5
CV-II
CV-12
Cy I
r
�O�o
o
pMd %F
CNE (T
. APPRC'AKAti FRCP N �
a naF
f
FKaL r.
LE (TYP.) _,
GG
I
IMButr
V
7
AB
NOF m°t"Y9°°1-nee
NI qt- _
- J
LWI GONRAD GEOSCIENGE CORP.
Page 1 of 1
Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
December 20,2000
Overcast, 25 deg F; B.P. _
29.58"Hg
Project#
CW000100 - 4`h Q 2000 Gas Monitoring
NSS
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wappinger
STATION ID
Inches H
%CH
%LEL
%O
Time
GV -1 - above
29.85
0
0
20.9
1126
GV -1 - inside
.1
2
14.2
GV -1 - below
0
0
20.3
GV -2 - inside
29.85
0
0
20.9
1048
GV -5 - inside
29.85
0
0
21.0
1043
GV -6 - inside
29.85
0
0
20.1
1020
GV -7 - inside
29.85
0
0
21.0
1023
GV -8 - above
29.85
0
0
20.7
1100
GV -8 - inside
1.7
34
18.3
GV -8 - below
.5
10
18.2
GV -11 -inside
29.85
0
0
20.9
1031
GV -12 - inside
29.85
0
0
19.5
1033
GV -13 - inside
29.85
0
0
20.9
1040
GV -15 - inside
29.85
0
0
21.0
1027
GV -16 - inside
29.85
0
0
15.2
1035
GV -17 -above
29.85
0
0
20.9
1056
GV -17 - inside
3.1
62
4.6
GV -17 - below
0.5
10
18.2
PV -1
29.85
0
0
20.6
1050
PV -2
29.85
0
0
28.9
1025
Gazebo
29.85
0
0
20.9
1108
Building
29.85
0
0
20.9
1025
COMMENTS
Exceedences of the %LEL are bolded
C.aONRAD GLo$GIENCF; CORP.
Enr i9 nmen& d Scientists
February 8, 2001
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, Ncw York 12603 - 845/454-2544 - fax: 845/454-2655
Andrew Lent
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
t., 3 1, 5 2001
'TOWN CLERK
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, Fourth Quarter 2000, CastlePoint Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience has completed groundwater monitoring for the fourth quarter of 2000 in
accordance with the 1999 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the above
referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On January 10th, 2001, Conrad Geoscience personnel visited the site to conduct quarterly
groundwater sampling. Samples were to be analyzed for the routine water quality parameters as
defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.1 l(d)(6). Three on-site monitoring wells were to be tested for
the 1993 baseline parameters; MW -8, MW -9, and SW -l.
Monitoring well MW -8R is a down -gradient monitoring well utilized to sample the
unconsolidated sediment aquifer. MW -9 is a 59.6' deep down -gradient monitoring well utilized
to sample the bedrock aquifer. SW -1 is an up -gradient well used to supply water to the onsite
facilities.
Samples from SW -1 were not collected for this well. This well is turned off during the winter
months.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the stipulated
monitoring wells (MW -8R, MW -9). Monitoring well MW -8R, did not yield sufficient
quantities of water to be sampled. The well volume for MW -9 was calculated and CGC
personnel purged the well dry 3 times before sampling to ensure capture of representative
formation water. Physical water quality parameters were monitored during purging and are
summarized on the attached sampling sheet. Samples were collected from Monitoring Well
MW -9 using dedicated polyethylene bailers and shipped to Columbia Analytical Services for
Castlepoint Landfill
File # CWOOO100
February S, 2001
Page 2
analysis of routine parameters as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6).
RESULTS
Monitoring Well MW -9
The following metals exceed NYSDEC standards in MW -9; Iron and Sodium. One other
inorganic parameter exceeds the NYSDEC standard in MW -9 (TOC). All results are presented
in the attached tables. Excerpts of the analytical report are appended. A complete copy of the
analytical report is on file with CGC.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/ehb
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin and DelBene
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls
Steve Capowski - Dutchess County DOH
attachments.
CONwm)Gi,.osCII]N(%CORP. F
Castlepoint Landfill
File # CW000100
February 8, 2001
Page 3
Table 1. Groundwater sampling results SW -1, and MW -9- Inorganic Compounds; collected
January 10, 2001 at Castlepoint Landfill, Town of Wappinger, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File # CW000100
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Method #
Limit
Class GA Drinking
Groundwater' Water'
PMW-8 SW -1 PMW-9
Inorganic Compounds
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
NS
NS
0.799
BOD -5
NE
NE
405.1
NS
NS
2.70
Bromide
NE
NE
300
NS
NS
1.00 U
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
NS
NS
0.00500 U
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
NS
NS
101
Chemical Oxygen Demand
NE
NE
410.4
NS
NS
7.46
Chloride
250
250
300
NS
NS
8.82
Iron
0.300
0,3
6010
NS
NS
12.5
Lead
0..025
NE
6010
NS
NS
0.00699
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
NS
NS
31.8
Manganese
0.300
0.3
6010
NS
NS
0.280
Nitrate Nitrogen
10.0
10
300
NS
NS
0.500 U
Potassium
NE
NE
6010
NS
NS
5,71
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
NS
NS
24.3
Sulfate
250
250
300
NS
NS
74.0
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310,1
NS
NS
337
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
NS
NS
454
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
NS
NS
400
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
351.2
NS
NS
0.981
Total Organic Carbon
0.10
NE
9060
NS
NS
2.26-2.38
Total Phenolics
0.001
NE
420.2
NS
NS
0.00500 U
Notes:
1 - Standards according to 6NYCRR Part 700-705;
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
U= Not detected, detection limit listed;
J=estimated value;
B=compound found in blank;
All concentrations are in ppm (mg/L) unless otherwise indicated;
NE=Not Established;
NS= Not Sampled;
Boldface indicated those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
CONMI) Cil OIK IENICI.i CORP.
CONRAD
GEOSCIENCE
,
CORP.
Well Developmenk Lag
PROJECT #
L uj'--X1. o jC)
MONITORING WELL M W-1
/
WELL LOCATIONr ��� �� IE�� `t�I� DATE — % ) INITIALS
Total Depth`
Depth to Water
-
_
, /`�
/rr
Casing Diameter
Volume per Foot
Water Column
=
II
qct 'Aii
2"
0.163
x'Gallons per ft. Of Casing x
�" 3
_ 4"
0.653
= Current Well Volume
=
6"
9.469
X3
=
q0
x5
-
'S-0
TIME
pH
Conductivity
Turbidity
D.O.(mg/L)
T (°C)
Salinity(%)
Gal
(mS/cm)
(NTU)
Purged
41 5-0
}
zz
G
q,
l' C.
st
3 S"
o
73
V
2_15V
71
Total Volume Purged/end purge -21
Comments:
Purged Dry?
S
Sampled?
�5
�((jTN„-
ApPRPXIMA TE PRCpERTY UNE (iYP.}
Har TO.
� r,®PT
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY(TW
PROPOSED RELOCAYTD L�cAnDN
-----
x -Srw
PMWW - 3
wSnNG LOcnTION
—
EXIS�TENO WELL
rty
.A
�p L op;
VWC WA Y RlVEWAY
1n
e0i�NA
a BENCH4IARK
,'
GV -2
R
°°,RrFs
.
ASA�ATW
�
C=1
G• 1
�
BALLFIELD
II1r
f
/
A
�U
11
O F
/�
�
♦
GV -4
♦
GV -3
°
a wswo . ae.ee
a rAo - ea r
�+r cgzego
TEssr�v
1]
�1
♦
$
a
�>as1,1,� °,,5 WN,(1.P)
GV -1J
tr
y
♦
Gv-e
GV -9
n
a:
Is
� NoT TD BE
IIEMT.D
GV�6
♦
GV -16
l�
mr � asMc ..aec
♦
Gy -7
♦
CV -12
♦
/
�
A
GV -11
TREEUNE
cV-15
'
PIIW - 5
= `
g
'
. APPROYJMAlE pRGpERT'f
urns ami .�,�
T.
�+� (TVP•)
i
"Ag
1ux1
ML
INv
"�
w AB
Columbia
4eAAnalytical
Servicesinc.
February 2, 2001
Mr. Chris Brown
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
8 Raymond Ave.
Poughkeepsie, NY 1.2603
PROJECT:CASTLE POINT LF
Submission #:R2105405
Dear Mr. Brown
A FULL SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
Enclosed are the analytical results of the analyses requested. All
data has been reviewed prior to report submission. Should you have
any questions please contact me at (716) 288-5380.
Thank you for letting us provide this service.
Sincerely,
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
A""
Mark ilson
Client Service Manager
Enc.
1 Mustard St.- Suite 250 • Rochester, NY 14609 ■ Tete:(716)288-5380 • Fax:(716)288-8475
Columbia,
Analytical
ervi c e S inc,
I Mustard ST.
Suite 250
Rochester, NY 7.4509
THIS IS AN ANALYTICAL TEST REPORT FOR:
Client : Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Lab Submission ## : R2105405
Reported : 02/02/01
Report Contains a.total of . pages
The results reported herein relate only to the samples received by
the laboratory. This report may not be reproduced except in full,
without the approval of Columbia Analytical Services.
This package has been reviewed by Columbia Analytical Services' QA
Department/Laboratory Director to comply with NELAC standards prior
to report submittal,
01
Columbia
4AfAnalytical
S ervi c e S,nc,
CASE NARRATIVE
This report contains analytical results for the following samples:
Submission #: R2105405
Lab ID
435504
All samples were received in good condition.
Client ID
Mw -9
All samples have been analyzed by the approved methods cited on the
analytical results pages.
All holding times and associated QC were within limits.
No analytical or QC problems were encountered.
Asalumbia
Analytical
ServiceSinc.
Effective 04/01/96
CAS LIST OF QUALIFFIEERS
(The basis of this proposal are the EPA -CLP Qualifiers)
U - Indicates compound was analyzed for but was not detected. The sample quantitation limit
must be corrected for dilution and for percent moisture.
J - Indicates an estimated value. For further explanation see case narrative / cover letter.
B - This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.
E = This flag identifies compounds whose concentrations exceed the calibration range.
A - This flag indicates that a TIC is a suspected aldol -condensation product.
N - Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
(Flag the entire batch - inorganic analysis only)
* - Duplicate analysis not within control limits.
(Flag the entire batch - Inorganic analysis only)
- Also used to qualify Organics QC data outside limits.
D - Spike diluted out.
S - Reported value determined by Method of Standard Additions. (MSA)
X - As specified in the case narrative.
CAS Lab ID # for State Certifications
NY ID # in Rochester:
10145
Cr ID 4 in Rochester:
PH0556
MA ID # in Rochester:
M-NY032
A1HA # in Rochester:
7889
NJ ID # in Rochester: 73004
RI ID # in Rochester: 158
NH ID # in Rochester: 294198-A
03
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Reported: 02/02/01
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID : MW -9
Date Sampled : 01/10/01 Order #: 435504 Sample Matrix: WATER
Date Received: 41/11/01 Submission #: R2105405
04
DATE
TIME
ANALYTE
METHOD
PQL
RESULT
UNITS
ANALYZED ANALYZED
DILUTION
AMMONIA
350.1
0.0500
0.799
MG/L
01/23/01
14:39
1,0
BOD -5
405.1
2.00
2.70
MG/L
01/12/01
07:35
1.0
BROMIDE
300.0
0.100
1.00 U
MG/L
01/11/01
14:18
10.0
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
410.4
5.00
7.46
MG/L
01/17/01
09:30
1.0
CHLORIDE
300.0
0.100
8.82
MG/L
01/11/01
14:18
10.0
NITRATE NITROGEN
300.0
0.0500
0.500 U
MG/L
01/11/01
14:18
10.0
SULFATE
300.0
0.200
74.0
MG/L
01/11/01
14:18
10.0
TOTAL ALKALINITY
310.1
2.00
337
MG/L
01/17/01
10:45
1.0
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
160.1
10.0
454
MG/L
01/12/01
10:10
1.0
TOTAL HARDNESS
130.2
2.00
400
MG/L
01/18/01
11:00
1.0
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
351.2
0.200
0.981
MG/L
01/24/01
11:32
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
2.35
MG/L
01/25/01
12:10
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
2,38
MG/L
01/25/01
12:17
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
2.32
MG/L
01/25/01
12 :2 5
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
2.2,6
MG/L
01/25/01
12 :3 2
1.0
TOTAL PHENOLICS
420.2
0.00500
0.00500 U
MG/L
01/15/01
10:00
1.0
04
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Reported: 02/02/01
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID : MW -9
Date Sampled : 01/10/01
Order
#: 435504
Sample Matrix;
WATER
Date Received: 01/11/01
Submission
#: R2105405
ANALYTE
METHOD
PQL
RESULT
UNITS
DATE
ANALYZED
DILUTION
CADMIUM
6010B
0.00500
0.00500 U
MG/L
01/15/01
1.0
CALCIUM
6010$
0.500
101
MG/L
01/18/01
1.0
IRON
6010B
0.100
12.5
MG/L
01/15/01
1,0
LEAD
6010B
0.00500
0.00699
MG/L
01/15/01
1.0
MAGNESIUM
6010B
0.500
31.8
MG/L
01/15/01
1.0
MANGANESE
6010B
0.0100
0.280
MG/L
01/15/01
1.0
POTASSIUM
6010B
2.00
5.71
MG/L
01/18/01
1.0
SODIUM
6010B
0.500
24.3
MG/L
01/18/01
1.0
os
2
ccO
LL
LLJ
D
a
LLI
cc
!N
V+
J
Z
a
It
O
cra
O
a
0
U)
LLV
O
Z
R
U
v
m
>- m
Z CO
N
z
O aay10
a
i
LL Z{ a Hd
0 ca
ui
a 0'43 > Hd
W6 fl3AIOSSla 'S1V13W
N (MOl391SI1)
N ltl101 'SlV13W
J•11u61 ❑ •Sajoo ❑ peed ❑
Z NOIIVZIU31OVdVHO 31SVM
Q dM ❑ s,VOAS ❑ s,VOA ❑
SlV13W ❑ d1O1
d101 ❑ 1V1O1 ❑
SVOAS OLZ81Sll S,UV1S
d1O1 ❑ lVlol ❑
S.VOA IZOS 1511 S.UV1S
£-96 ❑ 809 ❑ WOO ❑
SAOd/S301O11S3d
209409 ❑ IZ08 ❑
SVOA Oo
Z-96 ❑ 5439 ❑ OLZO ❑
SMOAS SMOJ
V96 ❑ 17N ❑ 0943a ❑
S.VOA WOO
Sa3NIV1N00 d0 #
c
LU
LU
a
� o
41 id m c
S di 5 0
E n
vii c F N
r
CL: Q3
z
wW m
u�i x El
S, z
dr _U
S Fi# _ m �Q
U.t¢¢ m m p I n UJv � G
I a
S ig . < - W
o amzwyz0 zvi W
CL
lu w (V t7 Y U) 'U 2
a o
v a
T z ❑
LU C m O
Wv 2 cc N J
I c e z C1 U
a E c 7
.�
cc 1! O ❑
G b a a r ? fn
c U
Ixa a
a z!� a a m
CC N a G OL
W
I i ccg 2 O
cr
p
Z 7 7
U LU
V
W y W W
m m Q m
E E EE
3 Z ! E z Z E
m
'C W .�
zr. a ii a in a` u7-. o
i
1
M mo
W W
S N
WE ! W m w m
IC z E >o z
a�Y
W EL CL
{
�
xx
U-
\
C
�.�/
[ ,
Pr?
W
U
W
cc
tr _
W O .
v
�U
W Q c I
¢ Q
z
0
LL1
ig
z
�- �- Z
U U
¢
LU
J
Q
}
,
F-
U)
a CUE
F-
LU
LU
a
� o
41 id m c
S di 5 0
E n
vii c F N
r
CL: Q3
z
wW m
u�i x El
S, z
dr _U
S Fi# _ m �Q
U.t¢¢ m m p I n UJv � G
I a
S ig . < - W
o amzwyz0 zvi W
CL
lu w (V t7 Y U) 'U 2
a o
v a
T z ❑
LU C m O
Wv 2 cc N J
I c e z C1 U
a E c 7
.�
cc 1! O ❑
G b a a r ? fn
c U
Ixa a
a z!� a a m
CC N a G OL
W
I i ccg 2 O
cr
p
Z 7 7
U LU
V
W y W W
m m Q m
E E EE
3 Z ! E z Z E
m
'C W .�
zr. a ii a in a` u7-. o
i
1
M mo
W W
S N
WE ! W m w m
IC z E >o z
a�Y
W EL CL
Columbia Analytical Services Inc.
Cooler Receipt And Preservation Check Form
Project/Chent .� Submission Number
Cooler received on _f ���t by:COURIER.- CAS UPS FEDEX ' CD&L CLIENT
1. Were custody seals on outside of cooler?
2. Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc.)?
3. Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken)?
4. Did any VOA vials have significant air bubbles?
5. Wer ce Ice packs present?
6. Where did the bottles originate?
7. Temperature of cooler(s) upon receipt:
Is the temperature within 0° - 6° C7: YesX Yes ❑
NO
NO
NO
YES N NIA
NO
C /ROC CLIENT
Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑
If No, Explain Below No ❑ Na ❑' No 0 No ❑ No ❑
DatelTime Temperatures Taken: % Cil ?, 53
Thermometer ID: 1 Temp Blank Sample Bottle Cooler Temp. IR Gun
If out of Temperature, Client Approval to Run
Cooler Breakdown: Date :%/ by:
1. Were all bottle labels complete�(r.e. Analysis, preservation, etc.)? O
2. Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? VNO
3. Were correct containers used for the tests indicated? O
4. Air Samples: Cassettes/ Tubes Intact Canisters Pressurized TedlarO Bags Inflated C_
Explain any discrepancies:
YES
NO
Sample 1_D.
Reagent
VoL Added
PH Rea8aA
12 Na0H
2 HNC,
2 H2SO4
Residual (Monne (+/-) forTCN & Phenol
5-90 P/PCBs (608 only)
YES = All samples OK NO = Samples wew presaved at lab as listed PC OK to adjust pH '
*If pH adjustment is rogArtd, use NaOH anNor 1-12SOc
VOC Vial pH Verification
(rested after Analysis)
Follow4 Samples
Exhibited pH > 2
Other Corrttllents:
07
Other Corrttllents:
07
gia
PAGGI, MARTIN& DEL BENE LLP
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
914-471-7898
914-471-0905 (FAX)
July 10, 2000
Town Board
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Attention: Constance 0. Smith, Supervisor
Reference: Castlepoint Landfill
Dear Supervisor Smith & Board Members:
HECEIVED
TU L 13 2090
ELAINE SNOWDEN
"rOWN CL IK
You are aware from our May 31", 2000 correspondence regarding the Castlepoint
Landfill of the fact that methane gas was escaping through the landfill vents. We
recommended that the Town retain a specialist in analyzing this condition and
make a complete assessment of any potential safety hazards with respect to the
landfill.
Field Safety Corporation was retained for that purpose and has filed a report
dated June 14`", 2000. 1 have enclosed a copy of that report for your review.
In their report, Michael Ziskin of Field Safety Corp., makes some
recommendations regarding the landfill and some recommendations regarding
establishing a uniform protocol for future gas monitoring. It is our opinion that
their recommendation listed on Page 1 of their letter, including items 1 through 6,
be completed as quickly as possibly, and that Conrad Geoscience, who is doing
the monitoring of the landfill on a quarterly basis, utilize the protocol established
in No. 7 on Page 2 of the same letter.
As you can see, the test results obtained by Mr. Ziskin were in conformance with
the test results obtained by Conrad Geoscience during their quarterly and
subsequent monitoring. Most important is the fact that in the bathroom and
gazebo, methane was not detected.
I have also enclosed in your packet a correspondence history regarding the above,
including the second round of testing done by Conrad Geoscience and transmitted
to us on May 31 ", 2000. Then gas samples taken approximately 1' away from
these vents exhibited no detection of methane.
I am taking the liberty of copying Stave Capowski, the interim Director of the
Dutchess County Health Department, of all these results, Andrew Lent of the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Ralph Holt,
Chairman of Recreation Committee.
joeph E. Paggi, Jr., RE. Ernst Martin, Jr., PE., L.S. Charles R. Del Bcne, Jr., 1`1',
Constance 0. Smith - 2 - July 10, 2000
Town Board
Re: Castlepoint Landfill
I would strongly recommend that the Town's insurance company be afforded the
opportunity to review this, and make their own risk assessment.
If there are any questions or if there is need for further discussion, please do not
hesitate to contact this office.
The scheduling of Items 1 through 6 in Mr. Ziskin`s June 14`h, 2000 letter, should
be done as quickly as possible, and monitored by the appropriate Town
departments.
Very ruly yours,
Joseph E. Paggi, ,
JEP:Iaw
Enclosure: (1) Field Safety Corporation Correspondence dated 06/14/00
(2) Conrad Geoscience Corp. Correspondence dated 06/01/00
(3) Paggi, Martin & Del Bene Correspondence dated 05/31/00
(4) Conrad Geoscience Corp. Correspondence dated 05/24/00
(5) Conrad Geoscience Corp. Correspondence dated 05/31/00
(6) Paggi, Martin & Del Bene Correspondence dated 05/17/00.
(7) Paggi, Martin & Del Bene Correspondence dated 05/10/00
(8) Conrad Geoscience Correspondence dated 04/28/00
cc: Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman w/enclosure
Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman w/enclosure
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman wlenclosure
Hon. Robert Valdati, Councilman wlenclosure
Hon. Elaine Snowden wlenclosure
Albert P. Roberts, Esq. wlenclosure
Steve Capowski, DCHD, wlenclosure
Andrew Lent wlenclosure
Michael Ziskin w/o enclosure
John Conrad w/o enclosure
Memo
To: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Attention: Andrew Lent
Fro% Peter J. Paggi
CC: Supervisor Constance O. Smith (w/out enclosure)
Date: 07/05/00
Re: Castlepoint Landfill
Comments:
Dear Mr. Lent:
RECEIVED
JUL 0 7 2909
SUPERVISOR'S OFFICE
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
As per our recent telephone conversations, enclosed please find information regarding additional gas
monitoring conducted at the Castlepoint Landfill in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County.
The correspondence and analytic data represent supplementary landfill gas monitoring performed by
Conrad Geoscience on May 26, 2000, as well as a site assessment performed by Field Safety
Corporation on June 1, 2000.
Conrad Geoscience is compiling the first quarter water quality results, which will be submitted to your
office as soon as they become available.
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions or comments.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Cadt 1DATAIDRAWINGS\DOCUMENTS�epiandfiill.gasmongodng.dec.7.05.00
0 Page I
Memo
To:
Hon. Constance Smith, Supervisor
From
Peter J. Paggi \ 4-P
CC:
Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero; Councilman
Han. Robert Valdati, Councilman
Date:
06/28/00
Re:
Castlepoint Landfill
Comments:
Dear Supervisor Smith and Board Members:
RECEIVED
JUN 3 0 2000
SUPERVISOR'S OFFICE
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
As you are aware, the firm of Conrad Geoscience, Corp. has been performing gas monitoring and
water quality testing at the Castlepoint Landfill. While collecting water samples, Conrad representatives
discovered that the 2" PVC casing in one of the shallow, overburden wells (MW -8) had been damaged,
and could not be sampled. The source of the damage is not readily apparent, but could have been the
result of previous construction activities, ground settlement, vandalism, etc.
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has estimated that it will cost $2975.00 to reinstall and develop the well. It
should be rioted that this well had been targeted by the NYSDEC to be part of the ongoing post closure
monitoring program
Please advise this office as to how you would like us to proceed in the matter
Any questions or comments may be addressed to this office.
Thank you.
Cad1 �DATAID"WINGSIDOCUMENTStplandfill.mw8.6.28.Do
• Page 1
�Nw7
PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP
r Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
56 Main Street
L Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
914-471-7898
914-471-0905 (FAX)
May 31, 2000
Town Board
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Attention: Constance 0. Smith, Supervisor
Reference: Castlepoint Land Fill
Dutchess County, New York
Dear Supervisor Smith & Board Members:
RECEIVED
J U N 0 Z 2000
ELAINE SNOWDEN
TOWN CLERK
As a follow-up to our May 10th, 2000 correspondence to the New York
State Department of Environmental Conservation regarding the above
referenced landfill, which you were copied, we are in receipt of the
following recent documentation:
• May 23, 2000 correspondence from Conrad Geoscience Corp.
• May 30th, 2000 proposal from Field Safety Corporation.
• May 31St, 2000 correspondence from Conrad Geoscience Corp.
I have attached copies of the above for your review.
It should be noted in the May 23rd, 2000 letter from Conrad Geoscience
that they acknowledge the fact that the methane that normally builds up in
the landfill is escaping from beneath the landfill cap through the vent pipes
as designed. They agree that we should move recreational activities
farther away from the vents, and make a more complete assessment of
any potential safety hazards. They had given us the name of Michael
Ziskin of Field Safety Corporation to contact.
I subsequently received a proposal from Mr. Ziskin on May 30th, 2000, and
have had a number of telephone conversations with him. I have asked
Mr. Ziskin to proceed with the initial consultation and, as matter of fact,
this if being done on June 1 `t, 2000.
will keep the Board appraised of our progress.
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. Ernsr Martin, Jr., P.E., L.S. Charles R. Del Bene, Jr., :?E.
Hon. Constance 0. Smith - 2 - May 31, 2000
Town Board
Re: Castlepoint Landfill
With respect to the May 31s', 2000 correspondence from Conrad
Geoscience. I had asked them to run an additional run of air sampling on
the vents. As you can see from this round of sampling, three (3) of the
sixteen (16) gas vents exhibited results in excess of 25% of lower
explosive limit (LEL) [as compared to four (4) last time], but samples taken
approximately 1' away from these vents exhibited no detection of
methane.
It should also be noted that samples taken in the building and the gazebo
existing on the site, exhibited a 0% concentration of methane, and
therefore no percentage of LEL.
We are following up on this as quickly and completely as possible, and will
keep the Board Members and Recreation Commission appraised of our
progress.
If there are any questions in the interim, please do not hesitate to contact
me at the office.
Very truly yours,
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E.
JEP:law
Enclosure
cc: Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman
Hon. Robert Valdati, Councilman
Hon. Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
Albert P. Roberts, Esq.
Ralph Holt, Recreation Director
Daniel O'Connor, P.E.
John Conrad
Michael Ziskin, CHCM, CHMM
01/24l(it) WEU 15:44 FAX 5144"54^555 (11 cc �pt71
I
CONRAD GEOSCIENC,E CORP.
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Phone 914 - 454-2544 FAX 914 - 454-2655
FACSIMILE COVER PAGE
DATE.- May 24, 22000 PROJECT 4CW000010o
TO: Jay Paggi
COMPANY; Paggi, Martin & Del -Bene
FAX: 471-0905
FROM- Christopher Brown
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet 2
MESSAGE:
Tetter re: Castle Point landfill attached, John will be out for the remainder of this week and
back on Tuesday,
Please call if you have any immediate questions.
Confidentiality Notice
The information in this transmission It, tntandad for the individual or entity+ named above. It may ho legally privllaged and confrdendal if
you have received this information in error, please notify us imm$dlataly and sand the original transmission to us by mad, If the raadar of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are horaby notified that any disclosure, disserrrinatron, disfrih[+don ar copying of this
vommuniaaticn or its contants is strtcdy prohlbitad.
a5i24 00 WED 16:44 FAX 9144542655 CC311C
CONRAD G»Oscr»NCE Coin
Emriranmrrntal Scicrxtists 1
May 23, 2000
Jay P aggi
Pagg,i, Martin & Del Bene, LLP
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
Re: Castle Paint Landfill
$ Raymond Avenue, Poughkeegsio, Now York 12603 - gi4t454-` 544 . fay 914/4$42655
Conrad, Geoscience File # CW000100
Dear Mr, Paggi:
As a follow-up to our post -closure [monitoring report for the Castle Point LandK and subsequent
discussions, the recent round of landfill gas monitoring did not indicate that methane is escaping
from beneath the landfill Gap, except through vent pipes, as designed. We agree that recreation
activities should be moved to an area farther from the vents until a more complete assessment of
potential hazards can be made. Foe those vents at which methane exceeded the lower explosive
limit (LEL), rive recommend that further evaluation be completed by a safety professional trained
and equipped to determine whether a potential fire or explosion hazard exists at those points
givers the proximity to foot traffic and other activities. In the past, we have contracted with firms
such as Field Safety Corp. to conduct such evaluations. I spoke with Michael Ziskin of Field
Safety Corp. (203/457-2100), and he is prepared to assist with the Castle Point Landfill
if requested,
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
John A. Conrad
Senior Hydrogeologist
JA.0/ald
Mai 313 00 01:38p North Branford Fax 203-483-6009
p.1
FIELD SAFETYCORPORATION
Compliance and Beyond... Through Services and Education
May 30, 2000
Mr. J. Paggi
Paggi, Marlin and DelBeni
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
RE: Site Assessment and Consultation Services
Dear Mr. Paggi;
As per our discussions, this proposal is to provide onsite assessment and consultation services on
thursday, June 1st, The proposed service is an initial site evaluation of the land fall venting system
with regard to public safety. Our fee to perform this onsite assessment and consultation is $950.40
based upon preparation, travel portal to portal, subsistence, and an onsite consultation of rip to three
hours, including air monitoring. Any additional time for the site assessment and `consultation over
three hours will be billed at $110.00 per hour.
FSC is prepared to proceed upon your authorization. Our "Standard Terms and Conditions" is
enclosed. If you are in agreement with these terms and conditions, please sign the enclosed
"Authorization to Proceed" and return a copy to our office. Any additions to the scope may require
an increase in the estimated price and will require approval from Paggi, Martin and DelBeni.
On behalf of Field Safety Corporation, thank you for the opportunity to propose our services to
Paggi, Martin and DelBeni.
Respectfully submitted,
FIELD SAFETY CORPORATION
Michael H. Ziskin, CHCM, CHMM
Executive Vice President
ENCLOSURE =
101 C Fowler Road, North Branford, CT 06471 + In CT (888) 964-9199 • PH (203) 483-6003 + FAX (203) 483-6009
Suite 101, 579 Lake Dr., Guilford, CT 06437 • In CT (888) 964-9199 - PH (203) 457-2100 • FAX (203) 457-2109
Mab 313 00 01:38p North Branford Fax 203-483-6005 p.2
Site Assessment and Consultation Services May 30, 2000
FIELD SAFETY CORPORATION
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
I, (Name, please print), authorize Field Safety
Corporation {FSC) to proceed with the Site Assessment and Consultation Services as
described in the proposal to the Paggi, Martin and Del Beni dated May 30, 2000.
I am in agreement with the Standard Terms and Conditions attached hereto. I also agree
to honor service invoices plus, if appropriate and directly stated in the proposal, invoices
for customary travel and sustenance expenses.
Should situations arise, out of general control, which alter the scope of this authorized
Work Plan, I agree to immediately notify Field Safety Corporation to negotiate
appropriate and reasonable changes.
Signature Title
Proposal No. 6"? 5 -
Category: 421
Field Safety Corporation
Date
Page 2
Mai 313 00 01:39p North Branford Fax 293-483-W9009 p.3
FIELD SAFETY CORPORATION
Standard Terms and Conditions of Sales and Services
A. General Conditions
1. If delays occur in the field due to weather, plant, or client equipment breakdown,
or other conditions beyond the control of FSC, while the personnel are on the job,
the client will be invoiced stand-by time at the appropriate hourly rates for the
personnel assigned to the job, in no cases to exceed eight hours per day per
person.
2. Personnel in the field over a weekend, where no weekend work is conducted, will
charge only their living expenses.
3. When personnel are in the field for periods in excess of three continuous weeks, a
trip home is scheduled approximately once every three weeks.
4. Costs are based on the transmittal of three copies of reports. Additional copies are
charged at direct costs for preparation.
5. All payments are due, in full, within 10 clays of billing by FSC unless otherwise
specified in quotation of services. An interest charge of 1% per month will be
charged on all invoices outstanding for 30 days or more.
6. For personnel assigned in the field, for periods which include holidays recognized
at the project site, the client will be invoiced at the appropriate hourly rates and
associated living expenses.
B. Professional Responsibility
FSC agrees that it will provide in connection with work performed, the
professional standards of care, skill, and diligence normally provided with respect
to similar professional services. FSC liability in connection therewith shall be
limited to the client's direct and specific loss or damage attributable to its failure to
meet such standards, but in no event shall. exceed FSC applicable insurance
coverage. All work and client relationships shall be conducted in a professional
manner.
Ma.y 317 00 01:39p North Branford Fax 203-453-6009 p.4
FIELD SAFETY CORPORATION - Standard Terms and Conditions of Sales and Services
C. Indemnification for Personal Injury or Property Damage
FSC and the client, each to the other will, but only to the extent of their respective
insurance coverages, indemnify, defend, and save the other harmless from all direct
loss, cost, expense, damage, or judgement directly resulting from thein respective
negligent acts or omissions (including acts or omissions of their agents and
employees) resulting in injury to persons or property.
A Sales Tax
When applicable, invoices will include Connecticut sales tax. The Connecticut rate
imposed is 6% on professional services and purchases of supplies and/or
equipment. if new or additional State taxes are levied, then, the rates will be
adjusted as prescribed by law, The client shall be responsible for sales or use takes
imposed by any other state. These taxes are not included within the cost of this
proposal.
F. Mon -Payment or Other Default
In the event that the client does not make timely payment of any amount due FSC,
then FSC shall have the right to stop its work, and that of any part subcontracted
by it, immediately and without notice to the client. Upon FSC's stoppage of work,
it will so notify client and unless client has made full payment within five days of
such notice, then FSC shall have the right, at FSC's option, to terminate the
agreement between the parties in which case shall be entitled to recover from the
client any and all amounts earned by FSC and due to FSC up until the date of
termination together with damages in an amount equal to FSC's lost profit in
connection with the project and any damages that FSC might incur to
subcontractors or others due to the early termination of this agreement together
with any and all other damages that would be available to FSC, either in law or at
equity, related to the breach by client of its said obligations. If the client makes
such payment within such five-day period, then it will also pay to FSC an
additional amount to compensate FSC for its personnel, as if a delay had occurred
under Section LA above, together also with any damages or amounts due to and
subcontractor from FSC as a result of such temporary work stoppage. Should a
petition in bankruptcy (under any provisions thereof) or appointment of a receiver
be filed by or against the client, same shall be deemed a default under the
agreement of the parties, entitling FSC to stop work and thereafter to terminate
this agreement and recover damages, as detailed above, unless such action is
withdrawn within ten days of its commencement. In case of such withdrawal, FSC
May 30 00 01:390 North Branford Fax 203-483-6008 p.5
FIELD SAFETY CORPORATION - Standard Terms and Conditions of Sales and Services
shall receive the additional compensation related to its own personnel and
subcontractors, as detailed above, for the period during which such work stoppage
occurred.
F. Costs of Collection
If FSC shall incur any costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees,
related to the enforcement of any of the terms and provisions of the agreement
between the parties or the collection of any amounts due to FSC related to said
agreement between the parties or the collection of any amounts due to FSC related
to said agreement, then FSC shall be entitled to be reimbursed by the client for any
and all such costs and expenses, including such reasonable attorney's fees, as may
be incurred by FSC.
G. Cooperation
The client shall provide full information, upon request by FSC, in connection with
the work to be undertaken by FSC and shall fully cooperate with FSC in carrying
out the work, either through its own employees and/or subcontractors arranged for
by FSC. In this regard, the client shall also designate a representative authorized
to act in the client's behalf with FSC, as relates to the work.
H. Tests, Inspections, Reports, Permits, Etc.
All tests, inspections, reports, permits, etc., shall be at the cost and expense of the
c Rent.
I. Contract Cancellation Policy
Cancellation of a duly executed contract can cause severe impact upon Field Safety
Corporation. In the event of a clients cancellation of a contract, the client agrees to
reimburse Field Safety Corporation for all charges and expenses that were charged
against the contract before notification of cancellation. The client also agrees to
reimburse Field Safety Corporation for reasonable and customary charges involved in
lost time and expenses incurred due to the cancellation. These reasonable, and
customary charges are not to exceed 25% of the initial contract price.
05,1`31,100 WED 11:48 FAX 914454855 CGC _. 121001
.A
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
8 Raymond Avenue
Pou.gnkeepsie, New York 12603
Phone 91.4 - 454-2544 FAX 914 - 454-26S5
5
FACS'[ MILE COVED. PAGE
DATE; May 31, 2000 PROJECT 9CWoo010a
TO: Peter Paggi
COMPANY Paggi, Martin & Del Bene, LLP,
FAX, 9.14-471-0905
FROM: Skip Sturdivant
Mumber of Pages including Cover Sheet 4
Supplemental gas monitoring report attached.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to can.
Thanks,
Skip
Confidentiality Notice
The imb mafion in this transmission is intsnded far the individual or entity named above. it may bo legally privileged and conndenfial If
you have received this infotmadon fn error, plaasa notify us irnmedlatoly and send the origlnal transmission to us by mo#. if the ruder of
this MOSS898 i$ not the intended wip enf. you are hamby noBfied that any dlSolosure, dissalnlnadon, dis&butfon or copying of this
camniunicafion or its contents is strictly prchibPted.
05/31/00 DYED 11:48 FAX 9144542655
CONRAD GBOSCYENCE CORP.
Envii-rrsm��rta! SrytitACsts ,
May 31, 2000
Peter S. Paggi
Paggi, Martin & Dei Bene, LLP_
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
CCX
8 Raymond Av�anue, Pough�cepsic, Now York 12603 • 9141454•2544 * kax; 9141454-4655
Re, post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Program
Gas Monitoring Report, Castle point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mx. Maggi;
Conrad Geoscience has completed the requested supplementary landfill gas monitoring at the
Castle Point Landfill,
On May 261', Conrad Geoscience personncl measured the percentage of methane (CIH4) and the
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL) from 16 gas vents and S ambient tests around the
perimeter of the landfill (Figure l).
Three of the 16 gas vents sampled exhibited values in excess of 25% of the LEL (GV- 7, S, 15).
Gas samples taken approximately one foot away from these vents exhibited no detection of
methane, percent LEL in the on-site building was 0.0%. Data from all gas monitoring paints is
presented in the attached table.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B, Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBBlald
attachments
05/31/x:0 WED 1.1:49 FAX 9144542655 CGC X003
A CONRAD CEOSCTFNCE CORP.
Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
5!26!00
Weather:
sunny and windy, 75 degrees
Project#
CW00010
Personnel
Nick Sturdivant
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill
NYSDEC
Site#
STATION ID
Pressure %CH %I_EL
GV -6
29.34 0.0 0.0
GV -7a
29.34 9.6 192
GV -15a
29.34 3.5 70
GV-Sa
29.19 11.9 236
GV -17
29.63 0.0 0.a
GV -1
29.71 a.3 6.0
GV -2
29.71 0.0 0.0'
GV -5
29.71
0.0
0.0
GV -13
29.63
0.0
0.0
GV -16
29.63
0.0
0.0
GV -12
29.63
0.0
0.0
GV -11
29.63
0.0
0.0
GV -9
29.63
0.0
0.0
GV -3
29.63
0.8
16,0
GV -815
29.63
0.0
0.0
GV -15b
29.63
0,0
0.0
GV -71b
25.63
0.0
0.0
PT -3
29.71
0.0
0.0
PT -4
29.71
4.0
0.0
PT -5
29.71
0.0
0.0
PT -7
29,63
0,0
0.0
PT -8
29.63
0.0
0.0
PT -9
29.83
0.0
0.0
PT -13
29.58
0.0
0.0
COMMENTS
5
CONRAD Gh;U'sauwc ' Copp. rim
05/31/40() WED 11:45 FAX 9144542655 CGC
Gas Monitoring Lag
Q0 ono
Date:
5/25/00
Weather
sunny and windy, 75 degrees
Project#
GW00010
Personnel
Nick Sturdivant
Project Name
castle Point Landfill
NYSDEC
Site#
STATION 1p
PT�12
Pressure
29.63
F%aCH
0.0
%LEL
0.0
PV -1
29.63
0.0
0.0
PV -2
29.63
0.0
0.0
building
29.63
0.0
0.0
gazebo
29.71
0,0
0,0
GOM1114ENTS
CoNnAS7 GWSCIENcr Carta r
PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
56 Main Street
f Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
F� 914-471-7898
914-471-0905 (FAX)
May 17, 2000
Town Board
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Attention: Constance 0. Smith, Supervisor
Reference: Castlepoint Landfill
Dear Supervisor Smith & Board Members:
ECEI r
MAY 19 2000
ELAINE SNOWDN
rowN CLERK
You are in receipt of a copy of a letter from our office to Andrew Lent of
the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regarding
the Castlepoint Landfill. As noted, four (4) of the seventeen (17) gas vents
exhibited a value in excess of 25% of the lower explosive limit (LEC).
It is our opinion at this point in time that the following should occur:
1. The Town should retain the services of a qualified firm to assess the
potential hazard for this gas vent discharge. We have taken the
liberty of speaking about this with John Conrad of Conrad
Geoscience, the firm that the Town retained to perform the quarterly
monitoring. They will be obtaining the name of a firm that can
provide the necessary services to the Town.
2. In any event, the southerly playground site should be moved to the
extreme northwest corner of the site to obtain the maximum
distance from the landfill.
3. The safety expert retained by the Town should render an opinion on
the appropriateness of the recreation use of this site with respect to
the summer program and the softball fields in the extreme east side
of the site.
4. The gas monitoring should be done on a quarterly basis as originally
accepted by the Town Board.
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P.E., L.S. Cherles R, Del Bcne, Jr., P.E.
Constance O. Smith - 2 - May 17, 2000
Town Board
RE: Castlepoint Landfill
We will keep you appraised of all progress and new news.
If there are any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact
this office.
Very truly your ,
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E.
JEP:Iaw
cc: Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman
Hon. Robert Valdati, Councilman
Hon. Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
Albert P. Roberts, Esq.
John Conrad
Ralph Holt
POST -CLOSURE MONITORING & MAINTENANCE MANUAL(PCMMW
ECEI V E
D E C 10 2000
ELAINE SNOWDEN
TOWN CLERK
CASTLEPOINT LANDFILL
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK
APRIL 2000
REVISED DECEMBER 14Tl, 2000
PREPARED BY:
PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
56 MAIN STREET
POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION:
PAGE
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION AND CONTACT LIST
1
B.
PROPOSED DEED REVISONS
2
C.
FUTURE USE OF THE PROPERTY
3
D.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
4
E.
SOIL COVER SYSTEM
5
F.
VECTOR ABATEMENT
6
G.
GAS MONITORING
7-9
H.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
10-11
° Baseline & Routine Testing Parameters:
12-19
1.
LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM
20
J.
RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING
21
K.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
22
L.
CONTINGENCY PLAN
23
M.
FINANCE ASSURANCE CRITERIA
24
N.
PROPERTY DEED
25-32
0.
SITE PLAN
Attachment
- TC -
A. GENERAL REOUIREMENTS:
The information contained herein is intended to constitute a Post Closure
Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCN" in accordance with the
following:
• 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.15(k)(7).
• Order on Consent (case #3-143218707).
• Local Government Regulatory Relief Initiative.
• Final Revised Closure Plan, dated July 5, 1996.
Contact numbers are as follows:
1, Supervisor Constance O. Smith
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
(914) 297-2744
2. Recreation Department, Attention: Chairman Ralph Holt
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
(914) 297-0720
3, Paggi, Martin & Del Bene, LLP
Attention: Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E.
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
(845) 471-7898
4. Groundwater & Gas Monitoring Personnel
These services will be performed by qualified professional firms on an
individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger subsequent to an
informal bid process. Appropriate names and contact numbers shall be
provided to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) as they become available. Groundwater and gas monitoring for
2000 shall be performed by:
Conrad Geoscience Corp
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Telephone: (845) 445-25441 Fax: (845) 454-2655
-1-
B. PROPOSED DEED REVISIONS:
The deed for the Castlepoint Landfill was revised to indicate:
• The general period of time during which the site was utilized as a landfill
(1972-1987).
• While an exact description of the wastes contained within the site is
unknown, a general statement was included indicating that the Town of
Wappinger utilized the site to dispose of items from individual residences
that were collected during Spring cleanup operations and yard wastes.
Available information from Town of Wappinger Highway Department
personnel indicates that metals and tires were separated during these
cleanup operations, and removed from the site for disposal elsewhere. Test
pits excavated by the Town prior to and during landfill closure operations
revealed wastes consistent in nature with such cleanup operations.
• All existing records of the facility including all subsurface investigation and
test results have been filed with the N.Y.S.D.E.C. This is noted in the deed.
• The deed includes a map which was also filed with the Dutchess County
Clerk's Office which clearly indicates the limits of the landfilled areas
within the property boundary.
e The deed also indicates that the use of the site is restricted pursuant to the
provisions of 6NYCRR Part 360-2.15(k)(9).
• A copy of said property deed is enclosed under Section "N" herein.
-2-
C. FUTURE USE OF THE PROPERTY:
While the un -landfilled portions of the subject property shall continue to be
utilized by the Town of Wappinger for community recreation purposes, the
landfilled areas shall be subject to a more restrictive proposed post -closure use.
The Town of Wappinger intends to implement restrictions to the landfilled area
as detailed in the following June 140', 2000 correspondence from Field Safety
Corp. (See Pages 3A and 3B). Please note that the existing playground area has
already been relocated off the landfill mass.
Use of the property shall not disturb the integrity of the final cover, liners, or
any other components of the containment systems, or the function of the
monitoring or environmental control systems, unless necessary to comply with
the requirements of Section 360-2.20 of 6 NYCRR Part 360. The N.Y.S.D.E.C.
must approve any disturbance and will do so only if the Town of Wappinger
demonstrates that disturbance of the final cover, liners or other component of
the containment system, will not increase the potential threat to human health or
the environment.
-3-
FIELD SAFETY CORPORATION
Compliance and Beyond... Through Services and Education
June 14, 2000
Mr, Joseph Paggi, Jr., P.E.
Paggi, Martin, & Del Bene LLP
56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Dear Mr. Paggi:
On June 1, 2000, Field Safety Corporation (FSC) performed an on site assessment and at
the Castlepoint Landfill, in the Town of Wappinger, New York. The scope of this service
was to perform an initial site evaluation of the landfill venting system with regard to
public safety. The site evaluation was conducted by Mr. Michael H. Ziskin, CHCM,
C MM of Field Safety Corporation. Mr, Joseph Paggi, Jr., P.E. of PAGGI, MARTIN &
DEL BENE LLP provided Mr. Ziskin with site specific information. The site evaluation
consisted of a review of background information including site maps, the final Post -
Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Manual, gas monitoring reports from Conrad
Geoscience Corp., and a survey of the landfill venting system. The survey of the landfill
venting system included a site walk over and gas monitoring. The gas monitoring
involved measuring gas venting temperature, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, percent
relative humidity, volatile organic compounds and combustible gases.
The site walk over and the results from the gas monitoring provided information to
support the following recommendations:
1. Relocate the playground from within the landfill boundary (preferably to the
opposite side of the park roadway;
2. Restrict all pedestrian and vehicular activity from within the landfill boundary
3. Identify all authorized activities within the landfill boundary;
4, Maintain the integrity of the landfill venting system by securing the landfill
perimeter with .fencing.
5. Establish setback criteria - from the landfill vents closest to the perimeter of
the landfill and the fence line (for the installation of the fence around the
perimeter of the landfill),
6. Identify each landfill vent with a corresponding marking.
101 C Fowler Road, North Branford, CT 06471 s In CT (888) 964-9199 • PH (203) 483-6003 + FAX (203) 483-6009
Suite 101, 579 Lake Dr., Guilford, CT 06437 • In Cr (888) 964-9199 • PH (203) 457-2100 • FAX (203) 457-2109
An Equal Opportunity Employer S—A
7. Maintain gas monitoring utilizing a protocol to establish uniformity,
consistency and duality control. This protocol should specify:
• calibration requirement for gas measurement instrumentation;
• landfill vents to be measured;
• exact location where the measurements at each vent are to be taken;
• parameters to be measured at each landfill vent;
• atmospheric and environmental conditions at the time measurements are
taken;
• visual inspection of landfill vents and perimeter fence integrity; and
• periodic review of the gas monitoring results.
A copy of FSC's gas measurement results and photographs showing the landfill venting
system are attached,
If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call me. I look forward
to meeting with you to prioritize and plan the implementation of the above
recommendations.
Very truly yours,
Michael H. Ziskin, CHCM, CHMM
Executive Vice President
S-5
D. SURFACE DRAINAGE:
Final surface slopes range from a minimum of 4% to a maximum of 33% to
promote surface runoff while maintaining slope integrity. Interceptor swales
have been installed upgradient of the landfill mass to prevent surface waters
from draining across the top of the landfill surface. Said interceptor swales
shall be maintained so as to operate continuously and effectively.
The gentle slopes and the grass cover will minimize soil erosion from both
wind and rainfall. In addition, quarterly visual inspections of the site will be
performed to determine if any erosion has taken place. Upon identification, the
necessary remedial erosion control measures will be undertaken.
Said quarterly inspections shall be performed by Town of Wappinger
personnel, or their designated representatives, and the results submitted to the
N.Y. S.D.E. C. as part of the annual inspection report.
-4-
E. SOIL COVER SYSTEM:
The grass vegetative cover overlying the soil cap will be the primary means of
maintaining the integrity of the cap system.
Quarterly inspections will determine if any slumping or subsidence in the soil
cover has occurred. Any changes of an unnatural degree that may occur in the
vegetative cover, any ponding of rainwater on the surface, and any apparent
observation of leachate outcropping to the surface, any signs of soil erosion
such as channeling shall be noted on the quarterly inspection report forms. In
addition, the vegetative cover shall be maintained so as to prevent shrubs and
saplings from growing on the landfill cap and penetrating the cover.
Said quarterly inspections shall be performed by Town of Wappinger
personnel, or their designated representatives, and the results submitted to the
N.Y.S.D.E.C. as part of the annual inspection report.
-5-
F. VECTOR ABATEMENT;
The primary method of vector control shall be through the installation of the
soil cap and topsoil cover. Secondarily, post -closure quarterly visual
inspections shall be conducted over the minimum post -closure period to
identify the presence of any vectors which may inhabit the landfill including,
but not limited to, rodents, insects, and birds. Should vectors be discovered
they shall be removed in a manner consistent with the N.Y.S.D.E.C. and other
recommended guidelines.
Town of Wappinger personnel or their designated representatives shall be
responsible for conducting the quarterly visual inspections and for
implementing any necessary vector control measures. The results shall be
submitted to the N.Y. S.D.E.C. as part of the Annual Inspection Report.
The site inspector shall observe any holes made by burrowing animals or other
evidence of the presence of vectors. If the landfill soil cap has been found to be
damaged it shall be restored to its original specification. Should the landfill
require any additional treatment for rodents, birds, or insect control, Region 3
N.Y.S.D.E.C. personnel, specifically the Pesticide Officer, shall be contacted to
approve any proposed extermination method prior to its implementation.
G. GAS MONITORING:
A soil gas survey was conducted at the Castle Point Landfill on February 13"
and February 15th, 1996. Four soil gas points (GM -1 through GM -4 and one
monitoring well (PMW-8) were field tested for volatile organic vapors,
methane, and explosive gases.
The soil gas points were constructed with '/Z inch or 2" (I.D.) PVC casing sealed
at the top with a rubber stopper. A plastic hose connector was inserted through
a hole in the rubber stopper and connected to a peristaltic pump via a length of
silicon tubing. A rubber stopper assembly was also connected to the other end
of the tubing at the discharge.
The peristaltic pump was used to draw air from the soil gas installation through
the silicon tubing. Air discharging from the soil gas installation was monitored
for organic vapors with an Hnu photoionization detector and for methane, %
LEL and 02 with a GasTech Meter.
To obtain reading from Well PMW-8, a 2 inch rubber cap equipped with a brass
hose connector was fitted on the well. Air readings were monitored by the
same procedures.
Results:
Volatile, organic vapor levels were slightly above background levels.
Readings ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 Hnu units.
• There were no detectable readings for % LEL or % gas (Methane)
• 02 levels ranges from 8.75% to 21%
A minimum of four gas vents per acre were constructed in the landfill. Gas
vent design meets the requirements of Part 360 except for depth penetration.
Gas vents penetrate to a depth acceptable to the Department, but not less than
six feet into the waste.
-7-
Post -closure explosive gas monitoring and maintenance shall be performed at
least quarterly to insure that:
a. Explosive gas levels do not exceed 25% of the lower explosive limit within
any structures on or off the site (except gas control or recovery system
components);
And
b. The level of subsurface explosive gas does not exceed the lower explosive
limit anywhere along the property boundary.
If monitoring shows these levels are exceeded, N.Y.S.D.E.C. shall be notified
and remedial action, such as the construction of gas cut-off trenches, should be
immediately taken. In addition, this quarterly explosive gas monitoring and
maintenance shall assure that the gas vents are not blocked and that landfill gas
has not damaged the final cover. Post -closure explosive gas monitoring shall
include: subsurface monitoring along a perimeter outside the waste mass but
within the property boundary; monitoring within all onsite and nearby
structures; and inspection of the final cover and surrounding area. Perimeter
subsurface monitoring shall be performed at maximum intervals of 100 feet if a
portable explosive gas detector is used. Monitoring with a portable detector
shall be performed when the ground surface has been wet or frozen for several
days. Monitoring shall be done below the wet or frozen zone. If permanent gas
monitoring wells are constructed for perimeter subsurface monitoring, they
should be located at maximum 'intervals of 400 feet. Wells should be
constructed to a depth of 75% of the maximum depth of the waste mass below
the surrounding ground surface or to the seasonal low groundwater level,
whichever is higher. The bottom 213 of the wells should be screened.
In addition, post -closure monitoring and maintenance shall include regular
inspection of the landfill final cover and surrounding area for cracks or stressed
vegetation which might indicate the escape of landfill gas. Areas where there
are cracks or where vegetation appears stressed shall be tested with a portable
explosive gas detector.
-8-
Any areas of the final cover which may have been damaged should be repaired
and steps shall be taken, such as the installation of additional gas vents, to
prevent future damage. Areas around the waste mass where gas is found to be
escaping shall be tested with a portable explosive gas detector to determine
whether they indicate pathways by which explosive gas is migrating offsite. If
so, additional measures shall be taken to prevent offsite migration. The
percentage of explosive gas emanating from gas vents shall be measured to
indicate the effectiveness of the gas vents.
All gas monitoring shall be performed when the atmospheric pressure is low
(below 29.92 inches of mercury). Atmospheric pressure shall be recorded
along with the other monitoring results.
If the landfill is on a property that is sufficiently large as to preclude offsite
migration of landfill gas, then the perimeter explosive gas monitoring
requirements are inapplicable. In order to qualify for omission of the perimeter
monitoring requirements, the distance from the waste mass to the property
boundary must be a minimum of 1,000 feet or adequate onsite barriers to gas
migration must exist. A barrier to gas migration is either: a ravine or
excavation with its base extending as deep as the base of the waster mass, or to
very low permeability soils or seasonal low groundwater, or a surface water that
has flow all year, and which is indicative of groundwater elevation.
Said gas monitoring shall be performed by qualified professional firms on an
individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger subsequent to an
informal bid process. Results shall be submitted to the N.Y.S.D.E.C. as part of
the Annual Inspection Report.
LandTll Gas Monitoring Protocol:
The standard operating procedures for collecting and analyzing landfill
decomposition gas data shall be in conformance with the following protocol
(see Page 9A).
WE
LANDFILL GAS MONITORING PROCEDURES
Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York
Summarized below are the landfill gas monitoring procedures for the Castle Point Landfill,
Wappingers Falls, New York. In accordance with 6NYCRR Part 360-2.15 (a)(2)(i - ii). The
intent of this investigation is to identify the presence and concentration of explosive gases at or
near the landfill, including at the property line, in all on-site structures, and in potentially impacted
off-site structures and to determine the extent of actual or potential for gas migration off-site,
• A GasTechGT201, or an equivalent instrument capable of monitoring %02, %Methane,
and %LEL (lower explosive limit) is to be used.
• The instrument is to be calibrated either in the field prior to sample collection or by the
rental agency prior to shipment.
• Monitoring points are the perimeter gas vents, the perimeter valves (314" PVC pipes), the
gazebo, and the bathroom, as depicted on the Paggi & Martin, 1990 Landfill Closure "As -
Built" diagrams.
• Gas samples are to be collected from. approximately 2 feet above each gas vent and within
each vent at the apex of each PVC riser. Samples are to be collected for 30 seconds at
each location. If positive readings are detected inside the vent, a reading will be taken
from the vent opening.
• Samples in the gazebo are to be collected from beneath the roof in the rafters.
• Samples collected in the bathroom are to be taken near the ceiling.
• All gas monitoring is to be performed when the atmospheric pressure is below 29.92
inches of mercury
• Barometric pressure should be recorded in table format in the field along with the other
monitoring results,
�-A r�
CONAL+w Gizos TT,,NCaS Com). L
� _mil
H. GROUNDWATER MONITORING:
The Town of Wappinger upgraded specific aspects of it's initial Landfill
Closure Plan to comply with the Part 360 regulations effective December 31,
1988 in an effort to secure State Assistance under the Environmental Quality
Bond Act (EQBA). Part of this upgrade included installation of two (2)
monitoring wells downgradient of the landfill in an effort to reduce future
environmental monitoring costs. This reduction in the sampling requirements
was detailed in a March 22"d, 1995 correspondence from Alan A. Fuchs, Solid
Waste Engineer — Region 3 to Supervisor Constance O. Smith, which indicated:
"The N.Y.SD.E.0 is willing to reduce the landfill's water quality sampling
requirements if two monitoring wells are added to the monitoring network
which are clearly capable of detecting the landfill's water quality impact. The
proposed water -quality monitoring reduction is to decrease the required
number of sampling locations per sampling event from five to three monitoring
wells The proposed program would include two monitoring wells
downgradient of the landfill and one upgradient monitoring location. "
The Town proposes to perform annual baseline and quarterly routine
monitoring of downgradient wells PMW-8 and PMW-9 and the existing
upgradient production well as indicated on the "As -Built" Plan. Said sampling
schedule would be conducted at this frequency until a minimum of ten (10)
rounds of test results are collected. After that time, and depending on the
results obtained, the Town of Wappinger may request that the N.Y.S.D.E.C.
modify the sampling and analysis requirements pursuant to the Local
Government Regulatory Relief/Initiative as follows:
Specific Variance. Post Closure Monitoring I:
The frequency of post -closure groundwater, surface water and leachate
monitoring required by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.15(i)(4) may be reduced from
annually for baseline parameters and quarterly for routine parameters to
annually for routine parameters and once every five years for baseline
parameters [See 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(c) (6)].
Siam
Guidance:
This means that the frequency and cost of post -closure testing for
contamination would be significantly reduced_ In order to qualify for this
variance, all of the following conditions should be met.
1. Contamination, except for leachate indicators, in down -gradient
groundwater monitoring wells does not exceed the groundwater standard or
background level, whichever is higher, for any contaminant.
2. The landfill is closed and maintained such that no surface leachate is
allowed to discharge from the facility; and,
3. There is no contamination of surface waters once cap construction is
complete.
4. The landfill should not be located over a sole source or primary aquifer.
Based on the post -closure monitoring results, N.Y. S.D.E. C. may require more
frequent monitoring at a later time.
Said water quality monitoring shall be performed by qualified professional
firms on an individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger subsequent
to an informal bid process. Results shall be submitted to the N.Y.S.D.E.C, as
part of the Annual Inspection Report,
Baseline and routine test parameters are outlined on pages 12 — 19 herein:
Monitoring well MW -8 was damaged prior to the April 2000 water quality
monitoring event. The well was replaced by Well MW -8R, installed by
General Borings, Inc. under the supervision of Conrad Geoscience Corp. The
Monitoring Well Installation Detail and Boring Log are attached hereto as
pages ll -A and 11-B.
Existing Monitor Well MW -8 was abandoned in conformance with
N.Y.S.D.E.C. well decommissioning standards as follows:
the steel surface (protective) casing was removed,
the subsurface PVC riser pipe was split, and
the well was pressure grouted from the bottom up to dissipate water and fill
all voids.
- 11-
as.r.itr+ru iir, .,x r'n:z ai44.rcu:.S,lallQ;J13UL
MONITOR, 11 INSTALLATION DETAIL
FOR WELL IN UNCONSO-LIDATED DEPOSIT
CfttLLsq:, , Erik DelFrjore BODING W, t PMW-86 GBl tog mo.: 180-00
TOP Or
CAS I tvcx EL,
:il.ltiF+4CE EL.
IE 21
2'
21
MORCHOLE
DIAMETER �
27
IMLL. PO € NT
20Z � �
BOTTOM OF
MORIN 37 '(
SITS= Castle Point CLIENT: Conrad GeoScience
Landfill - "—
Town: W Wa in er Falls I INSAI:+C'TOit • Chris Brown
DAM : 1012100
YE4790 LCCX3N4 ST91LIL CAA: X_yt$ _._XQ
cum BOX N3
--Yts .As
rotect '7a Steel. Casing -Lyes
Hounded Backfill YE5 X N0
-cCNCltE7i CCI.LAA10 --4.*(93 „"Q
-#ACXPILL -WATKXJA�t COnCrete, Grout
-"Pt OF CASIM5 a 5CRemP---C..��
L�. 2°.,,,.,,w.,,.� C.n. 2-3/3"
-.101"T 11rPt i Threaded
IMPEALEASU SACXFILL.
3entonite Chips
'SACXFILL IIATSitIAL', tELt 1=
SCREEN PACKING. 41
SC1t"M SLOT 51m. AN
SAGXFI" MATERIAL: Sand
13 Bags of Gravel 501b REFUISAL: Y93 ...,.... Mo
2 -Bag,? bentcaLa;•Chips
9.JCKLTS Of S£hITOVITE PF-LLSTS
5 !JAGS OF PORTLA M. TYPE I I CMMENT
SAGS OF PO' J.1 EENTONITE * FXW CUgXfr
N7CUM 0
PWTW1==' EVE 9 'CAS I NO
3*1 cum B=
1 Padlock -Master No. 2402
Locking Expansion Plug
1 2" Bottom Plug
L&/IY, VV IAAt, LV,Ui. l'1%-. VLY`*U-*LV VU 'I—tat' tai. Vied
11-B
SHEET 1 OF 1
General Borings, Inc.
P, O, BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT OC712
SOIL ENGINEER
PROJECT NAME: Castle Point Landfill
CLIENT:
Conrad GeoSvence
FOREIIMNIDRiLLER:
Erik DelPriore
INSPECTOR; Chris Orown
LOCATION; Wappinger Falls NY DESIGN ENGINEER
&Irface Elevation:
Date Started: 10/2/00
GBI JOB NO. 180-00
TYPE G Auger Casing Sam ler Core Bar Hole No. PMW-8 R
H Auger HA 8's, Line & Station
Date Finished: 10/2/00
Groundwater Observations
Size I, D. 3-1W' 1-318" Offset L R
AT AFTER HRS
AT AFTER HRS
Hammer 140 LBS, Bit N Coordinate
IlFafl
30 E. Coordinate
O
E
P
T
H
SAMPLE BLOWS
Casing PER $ INCHES
blows DEPTH PEN, REG. ON
per IN FEET NO, IN IN TYPE SAMPLER
foot FROM - TC 4�6 6-12 12 181 1824
STRATA
CHANGE:
DEPTH
ELEV.
HEW IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL,
REMARKS (,MCL COLOR, LOSS
OF WASH WATER, ETC.)
5
6To soil
M;scellaneous FILL, METAL, WOOD.
Broom fine-rnedlum SAND, some sift,
Same
}
— m
_
—
20
25--
30
40
27,0,
1) Very stiff -Gray SILT, some fine sand,
and fine -medium gravel, till,
Cobbles - Boulders
1
25.0-25.8 1 10 G SS 51 1com
_ ---
_
gas
END OF BORING 27,0' _
Note: abandon exising well, pull casing
grout hole
From Oround Surface o_ Feet s _ _ in. Ca ra Th'-, {n. Casinli For Feet
Feet in Earn 27 _ Feet in Rock 0 No, of Samples 1 Hole
�
_
SAMPLE TYPE CODING; ~� SS = DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED P STON
PROPORTIONS USED; TRACE -1-10°/n LITTLE = 10-20% � SOME m 20-35% AND = 35-500/a —
11-B
I MAZI01 V
2-27
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS TABLES
ROUTINE PARAMETERS'
360-2.11(d) (6)
Common Name'
CAS RN'
Suggested
Methods
PQL4
1
Field Parameters:
Static water level.. .....
(in wells and sumps)
Specific Conductance......
9050
Temperature....... ......
Floaters or Sinkers5......
pH ........................
9040
9041
Eh........................
Dissolved Oxygens. ......
Field Observations'......,
Turbidity.
180.1
Leachate Indicators:
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen...
351.1
60
351.2
351.3
351.4
200
Ammonia ...................
7664-41-7
350.1
60
350,2
350.3
100
Nitrate .......... ... ...
9200
Chemical Oxygen Demand.,..
410.1
50000
410.2
50000
410.3
50000
410.4
80000
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
405.1
2000
(BODS)......... .......
Total Organic Carbon......
9060
Total Dissolved Sol'ids....
160.1
40000
Sulfate ...................
9035
9036
9038
Alkalinity ................
310.1
20000
310.2
6000
Phenols ...................
108-95--2
8040
Chloride ..................
9250
9251
9252
Bromide... ...............
320.1
2000
Total hardness as CaCO3...
130.1
20000
130.2
30000
12—
LANDFILLS 2-28 360-2.11(d) (6)
ROUTINE PARAMETERS'
Common Name'
CAS RN3
1.
Suggested
Methods
PQL4
q l)
Inorganic Parameters:
Cadmium ...................
(Total)
6010
40
7130
50
7131
1
Calcium ...................
(Total)
7140
40
Iron ......................
(Total)
7380
100
7381
4
Lead ......................
(Total)
6010
400
7420
1000
7421
10
Magnesium .................
(Total)
7450
4
Manganese .................
(Total)
7460
40
7461
0.8
Potassium .................
(Total)
7610
40
Sodium..
Total
7770
8
ine department may modity this list as necessary.
Notes
'This list contains parameters for which possible analytical procedures are provided in EPA'Report
SW -846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, third edition, November 1986, as revised December
1987, and Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA-600/4-79-020, March, 1979. The
regulatory requirements pertain only to the list of parameters; the right hand columns (Methods and
PqL) are given for informational purposes only. See also footnote 4.
'Common names are those widely used in government regulations, scientific publications, and
commerce; synonyms exist for many chemicals.
'Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number. Where "Total" is entered, all species in the
groundwater that contain this element are included.
`Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs) are the lowest concentrations of analytes in groundwaters
that can be reliably determined within specified limits of precision and accuracy by the indicated
methods under routine laboratory operating conditions. The PQLs listed are generally stated to one
significant figure. PQLs are based on 5 ml samples for volatile organics and 1 L samples for
semivolatile organics. CAUTION: The PQL values in many cases are based only on a general estimate
for the method and not on a determination for individual compounds; PQLs are not a part of the
regulation.
5Any floaters or sinkers found must be analyzed separately for baseline parameters.
`Surface water only.
'Any unusual conditions (colors, odors, surface sheens, etc.) noticed during well development,
purging, or sampling must be reported.
113
r
{ LANDFILLS 2-29 360-2.11(d) (6)
of
"i
BASELINE PARAMETERS'
Common Name'
CAS RN3
Suggested
Methods
PQL"
1
Field Parameters:
Static water level........
(in wells and sumps)
Specific Conductance......
9050
Temperature... ... .....
Floaters or Sinkers......
pH ........................
9040
9041
Eh...... ...... ........
Dissolved Oxygen'. ......
Field Observations'.......
Turbidity..
180.1
Leachate indicators:
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen...
351.1
60
351.2
351.3
351.4
200
Ammonia ...................
7664-41-7
350.1
60
350.2
350.3
100
Nitrate.............. ...
9200
Chemical Oxygen Demand....
410.1
50000
410.2
50000
410.3
50000
410.4
80000
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
405.1
2000
(BOD5)..................
Total Organic Carbon......
9060
Total Dissolved Solids....
160.1
40000
Sulfate.......... .......
9035
9036
9038
Alkalinity ................
310.1
20000
310.2
6000
Phenols ...................
108-95-2
8040
Chloride ..................
9250
9251
9252
Bromide.. ...............
24959-67-9
320.1
2000
Total hardness as CaCO3.,.
130.1
20000
130.2
30000
Color .....................
110.1
110.2
110.3
80
1q
LANDFILLS 2-30 360-2.11(d) (6)
BASELINE PARAMETERS'
Common Name
CAS RN-'
Suggested
Methods
PQL4
1
Boron.
7440-42-8
Inorganic Parameters:
Aluminum ..................
(Total)
7020
10
Antimony ..................
(Total)
6010
300
7040
2000
7041
30
Arsenic ...................
(Total)
6010
500
7060
10
7061
20
Barium ....................
(Total)
6010
20
7080
1000
Beryllium .................
(Total)
6010
3
7090
50
7091
2
Cadmium ...................
(Total)
60.10
40
7130
50
7131
1
Calcium ...................
(Total)
7140
40
Chromium ..................
(Total)
6010
70
7190
500
7191
10
Chromium (Hexavalent)"....
18540-29-9
7195
7196
600
7197
30
7198
Cobalt ....................
(Total)
6010
70
7200
500
7201
10
Copper ....................
(Total)
6010
60
7210
200
7211
10
Cyanide ...................
(Total)
9010
200
Iron ......................
(Total)
7380
100
7381
4
Lead ......................
(Total)
6010
400
7420
1000
7421
10
Magnesium.... .............
(Total)
7450
4
Manganese .................
(Total)
7460
40
7461
0.8
Mercury ...................
(Total)
7470
2
Nickel ....................
(Total)
6010
150
7520
400
Potassium..
Total
7610
40
LANDFILLS 2-31 360-111(d)(6)
BASELINE PARAMETERS'
Common Name'
CAS RN3
Suggested
Methods
PQL4
1
Selenium ..................
(Total)
6010
750
7740
20
7741
20
Silver ....................
(Total)
6010
70
7760
100
7761
10
Sodium ....................
(Total)
7770
8
Thallium ..................
(Total)
6010
400
7840
1000
7841
10
Vanadium ..................
(Total)
6010
80
7910
2000
7911
40
Zinc ......................
(Total)
6010
20
7950
50
7951
0.5
Organic Parameters:
Acetone... ..............
67-64-1
8260
100
Acrylonitrile .............
107-13-1
8030
5
8260
200
Benzene ...................
71-43-2
8020
2
8021
0.1
8260
5
Bromochloromethane........
74-97-5
8021
0.1
8260
5
Bromodichloromethane......
75-27-4
8010
1
8021
0.2
8260
5
Bromoform; Tribromomethane
75-25-2
8010
2
8021
15
8260
5
Carbon disulfide..........
75-15-0
8260
100
Carbon tetrachloride......
56-23-5
8010
1
8021
0.1
8260
10
Chlorobenzene.............
108-90-7
8010
2
8020
2
8021
0.1
8260
5
Chloroethane;
75-00-3
8010
5
Ethyl chloride.........
8021
1
Epo
LANDFILLS 2-32 360-2.11(d) (6)
BASELINE PARAMETERS'
Common Name'
CAS RN3
Suggested
Methods
PQL4
1
Chloroform;
67-66-3
8010
0.5
Trichloromethane........
8021
0.2
8260
5
Dibromochloromethane;
124-48-1
8010
1
Chlorodibromomethane....
8021
0.3
8260
5
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropro-
96-12-8
8011
0.1
pane; DBCP..............
8021
30
8260
25
1,2-Dibromoethane; Ethyl-
106-93-4
8011
0.1
ene dibromide; EDS......
8021
10
8260
5
o -Dichlorobenzene;
95-50-1
8010
2
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene.....
8020
5
8021
0.5
8120
10
8260
5
8270
10
p -Dichlorobenzene;
106-46-7
8010
2
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene.....
8020
5
8021
0.1
8120
15
8260
5
8270
10
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-bu-
tene....................
110-57-6
8260
100
1,1-Dichloroethane;
75-34-3
8010
1
Ethylidene chloride:....
8021
0.5
8260
5
1,2-Dichloroethane;
107-06-2
8010
0.5
Ethylene dichloride.....
8021
0.3
8260
5
1,1-Dichloroethylene;
75--35-4
8010
1
1,1-Dichloroethene;
8021
0.5
Vinylidene chloride,.:..
8260
5
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene;
156-59-2
8021
0.2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene..
8260
5
trans-1,2-Dichloroethyl-
156-60-5
8010
1
ene; trans-1,2-Dichloro-
8021
0.5
ethene..................
8260
5
1;2-Dichloropropane; Pro-
78-87-5
8010
0.5
pylene dichloride.......
8021
0.05
8260
5
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene...
10061-01-5
8010
20
8260
10
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene.
10061-02-6
8010
5
8260
10
1 '7
LANDFILLS 2-33 360-2.11(d)(6)
BASELINE PARAMETERS'
Common Name'
CAS RN3
Suggested
Methods
PQL`
1
Ethyl benzene ..............
100-41-4
8020
2
8221
0.05
8250
5
2-Hexanone; Methyl butyl
ketone ..................
591-78-6
8260
50
Methyl bromide; Bromo-
74-83-9
8010
20
methane... ... ......
8021
10
Methyl chloride; Chloro-
74--87-3
8010
1
methane...
8021
0.3
Methylene bromide; Dibro-
74-95-3
8010
15
momethane...............
8021
20
8260
10
Methylene chloride;
75-09-2
8010
5
Dichloromethane.........
8021
0.2
8260
10
Methyl ethyl ketone; MEK;
78-93-3
8015
10
2-Butanone..............
8260
100
Methyl iodide; Iodomethane
74-88-4
8010
40
8260
10
4-Methyl-2--pentanone;
108-10-1
8015
5
Methyl isobutyl ketone..
8260
100
Styrene ...................
100-42-5
8020
1
8021
0.1
8260
10
1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane.
630-20-6
8010.
5
8021
0.05
8260
5
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane.
79-34-5
8010
0.5
8021
0.1
8260
5
Tetrachloroethylene; Tet-
127-18-4
8010
0.5
rachioroethene; Per-
8021
0.5
chloroethylene..........
8260
5
Toluene ...................
108-88-3
8020
2
8021
0.1
8260
5
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane;
71-55-6
8010
0.3
Methylchloroform........
8021
0.3
8260
5
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane.....
79--00-5
8010
0.2
8260
5
Trichloroethylene; Tri-
79-01-6
8010
1
chloroethene............
8021
0.2
8260
5
Trichlorofluoromethane;
75-69-4
8010
10
CFC -11 ..................
8021
0.3
8260
5
IM
LANDFILLS 2-34 360-2.11(d) (6)
RASFI NF PARAMETERS'
Common Name'
CAS RN3
Suggested IPQL4
Methods
1)
1,2.3-Trichloropropane....
96-18-4
8010
10
8021
5
8260
15
Vinyl acetate .............
108-05-4
8260
50
Vinyl chloride; Chloro-
75-01-4
8010
2
ethene..................
8021
0.4
8260
10
Xylenes ...................
1330-20-7
8020
5
8021
0.2
8260
5
The department may modify this list as necessary.
Notes
'This list contains 47 .volatile organics for which possible analytical procedures provided in EPA
Report SW -846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, third edition, November 1986, as revised
December 1987, includes Method 8260; 25 metals for which SW -846 provides either Method 6010 or a
method from the 7000 series of methods; and additional parameters for which possible procedures are
provided in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA-600/4-79-020, March, 1979. The
regulatory requirements pertain only to the list of parameters; the right hand columns (Methods and
PQL) are given for informational purposes only. See also footnote 4.
"Common names are those widely used in government regulations, scientific publications, and
commerce; synonyms exist for many chemicals.
'Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number. Where "Total" is entered, all species in the
groundwater that contain this element are included.
'Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs) are the lowest concentrations of analytes in groundwaters
that can be reliably determined within specified limits of precision and accuracy by the indicated
methods under routine laboratory operating conditions. The PQLs listed are generally stated to one
significant figure, PQLs are based on 5 ml samples for volatile organics and 1 L samples for
semivolatile organics. CAUTION: The PQL values in many cases are based only on a general estimate
for the method and not on a determination for individual compounds; PQLs are not a part of the
regulation.
'Any floaters or sinkers found must be analyzed separately for baseline parameters.
`Surface water only.
'Any unusual conditions (colors, odors, surface sheens, etc.) noticed during well development,
purging, or sampling must be reported.
'The department may waive the requirement to analyze Hexavalent Chromium provided that Total and
Hexavalent and Trivalent Chromium values do not exceed 0.05 mg/l.
I. LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM:
Leachate control systems have not been designed as part of this landfill closure
plan. The soil cap will prevent rainwater from infiltrating into the landfill mass,
thus restricting potential leachate development. The grading of the site, as
discussed in previous sections, will encourage surface water to flow off the
landfill mass and thus, prevent further leachate from forming.
During the quarterly visual inspections, leachate outcropping will be looked for.
If found, it will be immediately noted and proper engineering control measures
(as approved by the N.Y.S.D.E.C.) shall be implemented.
Said quarterly inspections shall be performed by Town of Wappinger
personnel, or their designated representatives and the results submitted to the
N.Y.S.D.E.C. as part of the Annual Inspection Report.
-20-
I RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING:
Quarterly visual inspections of the site will be conducted by Town personnel or
their designated representatives for the minimum post closure period following
completion of the landfill closure. These reports will be filed at the Town Hall.
These inspections will include the soil cap and topsoil, venting system, site
drainage, specifically any items such as subsidence of the soil cap, areas of the
erosion, dead or dying vegetation, vandalism, and vectors will be reported
immediately to Town personnel followed by taking of corrective action. In
addition, qualified professional firms will be contracted with to perform
quarterly and annual groundwater quality and gas monitoring following
N.Y.S.D.E.C. protocols.
An annual report will be submitted to N.Y.S.D.E.C. which contains an analysis
of the groundwater quality sampling, gas monitoring and annual inspection
report by the Town of Wappinger identifying results of the quarterly visual
inspections, and any maintenance necessary during the year.
Copies of all said information shall be available for inspection at the Town of
Wappinger Town Hall.
-21-
K. RESOURCE REOUIItEMENTS:
Quarterly visual inspections of the soil cap, vegetative cover, site drainage,
venting system, areas of subsidence, erosion, dying vegetation, vandalism and
vectors shall be performed by Town of Wappinger personnel or their designated
representatives.
The Town of Wappinger work force includes staff and equipment sufficient to
perform this work.
Quarterly water quality and gas monitoring shall be performed by qualified
professional firms on an individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger
subsequent to an informal bid process. The names and contact numbers of said
professional firms shall be provided to the N.Y. S.D.E. C. as they become
available.
-22-
M. FINANCIAL ASSURANCE CRITERIA:
The Town of Wappinger is in the process of securing bids for quarterly water
quality and gas monitoring services as detailed herein, Upon final acceptance
of a qualified professional firm, the estimated yearly costs to perform the
prescribed work will be submitted to the N.Y.S.D.E.C.
All other work will be performed on a force account basis by Town personnel.
The Town of Wappinger owns and will continue to own the Castle Point
Landfill site, and will be financially responsible for post -closure monitoring and
maintenance.
-24-
DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK RECORDING PAGE
RECORD & RETURN TO:
PAGGI MARTIN & DEL BENE
56 MAIN ST
POUGHKEEPSIE NY 12601
RECEIVED FROM: PAGGI & MARTIN.
RECORDED: 10/12/2000
AT: 09:17:07
DOCUMENT #: 02 2000 9154
GRANTOR: WAPPINGER TOWN
GRANTEE: WAPPINGER TOWN
RECORDED IN: DEED TAX
INSTRUMENT TYPE: DEC/COV/REST DISTRICT: WAPPINGER
EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS:
RECORDING CHARGE:
TRANSFER TAX AMOUNT:
TRANSFER TAX NUMBER;
E & A FORM: N
TP -584: N
11111111111111111111 lill
2�5
36.00
NUMBER OF PAGES: 8
*** DO NOT DETACH THIS PAGE
*** THIS IS NOT A BILL
COUNTY CLERK BY: FRS /
RECEIPT NO: R57663
BATCH RECORD: D00067
r
RICHARD M.
ANDERSON
County
Clerk
a
z
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
THIS DECLARATION of Covenants and Restrictions, hereinafter referred to as
"Declaration" is hereby made they of <�. 2000 by the Town Board of
the Town of Wappinger, a Municipal Subdivision, with offices situate at Town Hall, 20
Middlebush Road, P.O. Box 324, Wappingers Falls, New York 12590-0324, hereinafter
referred to as the "DECLARANT".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Declarant is the owner in fee simple of certain premises more
particularly described in a certain deed recorded in the Dutchess County Clerk's office
at Liber 1340 page 388, subject to all covenants, restrictions, easements and
reservations to the property described as follows:
Tract 1
Beginning at a point on the east side of Chelsea Road, said point being S 74 55'
13"E 5.00 feet and S 17 06' 32" W 60.10 feet and S 10 07'42" W 29.41 feet and S 04
44' 19" W 437.82 feet from a concrete monument marking the southwest corner of the
lands formerly of Joseph Rudi and the former northwest corner of the lands of the
United States Government, %`�c +? <)7'- '.��. ;�y)
thence S 76 22' 11" E 745.15 feet, thence S 68 22' 11" E 520.51 feet,
thence S 62 14' 40" E 298.70 feet, thence S 75 00' 10" E 527.75 feet,
thence N 68 47' 50" E 848.30 feet to a stone wall, thence S 50 30' 20"
E 451.14 feet, thence S 51 33' 31" E 119.93 feet, thence S 50 33' 17"
W 778,74 feet, thence S 68 22' 10" W 510.00 feet, thence S 36 15' 31"
W 385.68 feet, thence N 70 09' 19" W 1467.75 feet, thence N 87 36'28"
W 759.85 feet to the east line of Chelsea Road, thence along said road
line N 02 24' 50" W 115.24 feet, thence N 02 14'34" W 29.93 feet, thence
N 11 29' 09" E 269.72 feet, thence N 07 40' 43" E 135.64 feet,
thence N 04 44' 19" E 19.97 feet to the point and place of beginning.
2 G
Tract 2
Beginning at a point on the west side of Chelsea Road, said point being S 20 05'
56" W 183.06 feet from the southwest corner of lands formerly of Joseph Rudi, thence
along the lands of the New York Central railroad S 20 05' 50" W 194.14 feet, thence S
07 34' 12; W 110,64 feet, thence S 20 05' 56" W 162.00 feet, thence S 47 55' 23" W
a.: 122.12 feet, thence S 65 47' 25" E 174.77 feet to the west line of Chelsea Road, thence
N 11 29' 09" E 100.00 feet, thence N 07 40' 34" E 133.69 feet, thence N 04 44' 19" E
368.41 feet to the point and place of beginning_
The above property is hereinafter referred to as "Tract 1" and "Tract 2"; and
:i
WHEREAS, said Tract 1 and Tract 2 have bean utilized as a landfill for the period
4 of time from approximately 1972 to 1987; and
WHEREAS, said Tract 1 and Tract 2 have not been used as a landfill or received
waste since 1987; and
WHEREAS the Town of Wappinger utilized the site to dispose of items from
individual residences that were collected during the Town's annual "Spring Clean Up"
operation which also collected various yard wastes; and
WHEREAS, metals and tires were separated during these clean up operations
and were removed from the site for disposal other than at Tract 1 and Tract 2; and
WHEREAS, all existing records of the facility including all subsurface
investigations and test results have been filed with the New York State DEC; and
WHEREAS, simultaneous with the filing of this Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions, a map indicating the limits of the landfilled areas within Tract 1 and Tract 2
boundaries shall be filed with the Dutchess County Clerk's office.
NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby covenant, declare and agree, for
itself, its successors and assigns, that the property shall be held, transferred, conveyed,
used and occupied subject to the following covenants and restrictions and these
Z-7
covenants and restrictions shall apply in their entirety to all the property referred to on
the above described map:
I. Use of the above described premises is restricted pursuant to the provisions
of 6NYCRR Part 360-2.15(k)(9);
2. The above described premises be used only for community recreational
purposes and that a uniform scheme for the development, protection and
preservation of the value and beauty of these premises has been created;
3. the use of the property shall not disturb the integrity of the final cover, liners,
or any other components of the containment systems, or the function of he
monitoring or environmental control systems, unless necessary to comply
with the requirement of Section 360-2.20 of 6 NYCRR Part 360.
THE COVENANTS, conditions, reservations and restrictions set forth above
are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons for a
period of twenty five (25) years from the date on which these covenants,
conditions, reservations and restrictions are recorded in the Office of the
Dutchess County Clerk. Thereafter, the covenants, conditions, reservations and
restrictions shall be automatically extended for successive periods of twenty five (25)
years unless an instrument repealing or amending said covenants, conditions,
reservations and restrictions has been recorded in the Office of the Dutchess County
Clerk.
ENFORCEMENT of these covenants, conditions, reservations and restrictions
shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person, persons, agency and/or
1C�
t entity violating or attempting to violate any such covenants, conditions, reservations and
restrictions.
INVALIDATION of any one of these covenants, conditions, reservations and
restrictions in this instrument or the failure to enforce any of the restrictions at the time
of its violation shall in no event affect any of the other restrictions nor be deemed a
waiver of the right subsequently to enforce the unenforced restriction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration has been executed as the date and
year first above written.
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Hon. Constance O. Smith, Supervisor
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS ) ss.
On Gn 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public
in and for said State, personally appeared HON. CONSTANCE O. SMITH, personally
known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the
individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the
instrument.
Notary Public
ALBERT P. ROBERTS
NOTARY PUBLIC; State of ilew York
Qualffied in Dotch�,ss Caun�
Commission i~xpires Feb. 23, � �=
MiA
e
§
�9
!
/\ /�
1
-9 5;
/
�?
/
ggn
>§
j?a7 —
oz
ono
j�\\
� \
$z>J�
®2�»
¢
�q
v�
/\\D
z§�
�k
n
/\ \ Z
k
w
\� R
LoG
§l
,
§
R� 3.1
10* TOTAL DEPTH
'Pon
ME
�^ f
amm'D 5dgjmo r �W nAA
FZZ nAA� ��.ZDI N
z
m zzom m zm
z J A ;u
_n
ovmc>
DmA 1
• o �
D
z
3' MIN. rn
X
cn
f
o°000
-
a
o 000
0 0 0 0 0°0
X m
U m
-•I. G7
000000
000000
000000
00000a �r: z"'•
0 00000
Z
o0°000-
o
00
.00000
C
o°o °000°.foo.
000000
000 -'
—000
-1
Z
O
000000
00.00 -
z
o°0 0 0 0 0o
00000
o o°o°
1 0°0°000
�n
Z
a000°0
000000
Z
.00000
°°°°°
000000
00000 -
C70-4
o
0.00
°00000
�0 000000"
�a000
oo o
X0000000
?
00000000000
00
C°o°0000C
NE
000
Lo
zA
00000a
DA
000ao '
J ITI S N
COzD
o°�
U)
000000
00000
000
000000
�^ f
amm'D 5dgjmo r �W nAA
FZZ nAA� ��.ZDI N
z
m zzom m zm
z J A ;u
_n
ovmc>
DmA 1
• o �
D
z
3' MIN. rn
X
cn
f
�1
D
r
X
m
=j
X X X
co Ln cn
--1 ::j -
X
Tn
-u
X m
U m
-•I. G7
z
G-)
C)
Z
z
r
n
z z z
6) Q) K:
z
n
O
X
y
z m
Z
0
n�
cn
n
Z
n m o
(n m Z
o�
z
o
m
-0
x
n
z
z
o
z0 m �;u
::E
O
O
0
A
Z
--]
�4
C70-4
o
Rom
IM9
r
m
n
oA
1 n5
2
V
I
Z
m
m
Lo
zA
DA
D
J ITI S N
COzD
-n Q Q
U)
"s
I
I
I
�
�
i
9X
0
0
to
I
t
ZCd
VERTICAL PAYMENT
m
LIMITS TYh.
o
M 0y
:Y.
m
x
z sy
0
vn
am
in
n
D
=
m
O CQ
M'U
F, D
O
x =m
--]
�4
0
F
Rom
IM9
�
z
F
oA
1 n5
2
V
C7
�L�„��
0
Lo
zA
c
D
J ITI S N
COzD
-n Q Q
U)
"s
9X
>Oi
yA '
Oi
z�
o
O3=1
m
D
73>
O
FO
A
=lm
O
K
m
gam,
V)rn
I
IA
I
,k
u
Z
vcn
O
m�
o 0-1
m
m
0
D
m
;Y z m
z�
m
L�I>^
I 7
eo
u
�y
A
n
Z
n
z
Z
m
r
ri
PE
r�z
A
4.0'
VERTICAL PAYMENT
LIMITS TYh.
t
:Y.
m
x
z sy
0
vn
am
in
X
0
0>
O CQ
M'U
x =m
Z
A
�4
0
F
Rom
�U
D
oA
1 n5
2
V
U ,
O
Lo
zA
c
\ c
m 0
"s
9X
>Oi
yA '
Oi
z�
o
O3=1
m
D
Ah�m
O
FO
A
=lm
O
K
m
gam,
>I
I
IA
I
,k
u
4.0'
(n
C)
D
F-
CD O
O
Ir-
O
P
�
� �
�• b i
n
/,a� . N
c
w7 OY'
p
,
♦ J � �yb �
d
cp n
(
�
o
f
♦
��'
/
.o
it
(n
C)
D
F-
CD O
O
O p -9D
D ZC)M
r AMZ
c
no�
GO X
D � V
OT, cn? ,,,� ID
D 0
C)
n Z 41
II mm�
P b D
0 C G7
pp —I m
m�
D U) OD
C) Lf)
m
u ra
°zOpp7
L2:12r>rD ZNo�jm"91
go
m
ycm'
� 9 fmuai� °mmzm >I�
�ZN�v>imnm��Dnpp�np g0�
m r m mmw
mo��p���r5`gm��,5°pm
azpooA>FkmymNZWa"o
FI<iah�p�o��mrn�oN ooh
�y°�F�Xom >yF co AN
mzmg3�w>(•+'�iK��c$ii r°'�� MSC
m
mv�Am� n°vaizm� rAi�'S' mea
z m s=
C�ZVIS ��Zc�nC >AD �CGJ
amz�zFoZz�a �:i yr moa
IAa ° AC,
o
Ir-
O
P
�
� �
�• b i
n
/,a� . N
c
w7 OY'
p
,
♦ J � �yb �
cp n
(
o
f
♦
��'
/
.o
it
55i
J4 cu
0zr-
�r
COQ
r0
O p -9D
D ZC)M
r AMZ
c
no�
GO X
D � V
OT, cn? ,,,� ID
D 0
C)
n Z 41
II mm�
P b D
0 C G7
pp —I m
m�
D U) OD
C) Lf)
m
u ra
°zOpp7
L2:12r>rD ZNo�jm"91
go
m
ycm'
� 9 fmuai� °mmzm >I�
�ZN�v>imnm��Dnpp�np g0�
m r m mmw
mo��p���r5`gm��,5°pm
azpooA>FkmymNZWa"o
FI<iah�p�o��mrn�oN ooh
�y°�F�Xom >yF co AN
mzmg3�w>(•+'�iK��c$ii r°'�� MSC
m
mv�Am� n°vaizm� rAi�'S' mea
z m s=
C�ZVIS ��Zc�nC >AD �CGJ
amz�zFoZz�a �:i yr moa
IAa ° AC,
o
Ir-
O
P
�
� �
Z
aM.c�
c
n
D
_I
p
cp n
2
�_ )
m�
Q
O
zu
J4 cu
0zr-
�r
COQ
r0
c
D*(n
X
221
X
0 �
�m:
Z
oQ
<-
;a
v C
J 0
0
`CDZG
O
Z
0
v
r ; Ng
D{�
a
o �
0
O p -9D
D ZC)M
r AMZ
c
no�
GO X
D � V
OT, cn? ,,,� ID
D 0
C)
n Z 41
II mm�
P b D
0 C G7
pp —I m
m�
D U) OD
C) Lf)
m
u ra
°zOpp7
L2:12r>rD ZNo�jm"91
go
m
ycm'
� 9 fmuai� °mmzm >I�
�ZN�v>imnm��Dnpp�np g0�
m r m mmw
mo��p���r5`gm��,5°pm
azpooA>FkmymNZWa"o
FI<iah�p�o��mrn�oN ooh
�y°�F�Xom >yF co AN
mzmg3�w>(•+'�iK��c$ii r°'�� MSC
m
mv�Am� n°vaizm� rAi�'S' mea
z m s=
C�ZVIS ��Zc�nC >AD �CGJ
amz�zFoZz�a �:i yr moa
IAa ° AC,
o
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Ea *vnmexta1 S6ev&ts
November 8, 2000
Andrew Lent
NYSDEC Region 3
Division of Solid Waste
200 White Plains Rd. 5h Floor
Tarrytown, NY 10591-5805
B Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 •914/454-2544 • fax: 9141454-2655
RECEIVEL
NOV 1 O 2000
ELAINE SNOWDEN
TOWN CLERK
Re: Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Program
Yd Quarter Gas Monitoring Report, Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent;
Conrad Geoscience has completed landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the April 2000 Post Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Program (PCMMP).
On October 2, 2000, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), percentage of carbon dioxide (CO2), and
percentage of oxygen(02)from 13 gas vents around the perimeter of the landfill (Figure 1).
Measurements were also collected from within nearby structures.
Sampling was conducted in accordance with the attached procedure for landfill gas monitoring,
which should be appended to the PCMMP. Measurements were taken above the vents, within the
vents and beneath the opening of these vents.
• Of the 13 vent locations monitored none had detectable concentrations of methane above
the vent pipe.
• Four vents had detectable concentrations of methane within the gas vent. Three of these.
vents exhibited values in excess of 25% of the LEL (GV -1, 7 and 8). Each of these
locations had detectable concentrations of methane at the vent opening.
QWy UocumentAConrad Geosdenoe11_W000100 L=dfiH Gas Monitorin&\GasMoF l0rdQ2000.wpd
• LEL readings in the on-site building and gazebo were 0.0%.
Data from all gas monitoring points is presented in the attached table. Landfill gas monitoring for
the second quarter has been tentatively scheduled for July 2000. If you have any questions or
concerns- please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
C GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
attachments
ec: Town Clerk w/ attachments
Peter Paggi w/ attachments
v
CAMYDocumentslfiowadGeoscicnceNCW000100VAndfUGas ManitDri \GasMoriMdQ2000.wpd
z
CONRAD GEOSCIIENCE CORP. [fv�
LANDFILL GAS MONITORING PROCEDURES
Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls, New York
Summarized below are the landfill gas monitoring procedures for the Castle Point Landfill,
Wappingers Falls, New York. In accordance with 6NYCR.R Part 360-2.15 (a)(2)(i - ii). The
intent of this investigation is to identify the presence and concentration of explosive gases at or
near the landfill, including at the property line, in all on-site structures, and in potentially impacted
off-site structures and to determine the extent of actual or potential for gas migration off-site.
• A GasTechGT201, or an equivalent instrument capable of monitoring %02i %Methane,
and %LEL (lower explosive limit) is to be used.
• The instrument is to be calibrated either in the field prior to sample collection or by the
rental agency prior to shipment.
• Monitoring points are the perimeter gas vents, the perimeter valves (314" PVC pipes), the
gazebo; and the bathroom, as depicted on the Paggi & Martin, 1999 Landfill Closure "As -
Built" diagrams.
• Gas samples are to be collected from approximately 2 feet above each gas vent and within
each vent at the apex of each PVC riser. Samples are to be collected for 30 seconds at
each location. If positive readings are detected inside the vent, a reading will be taken
from the vent opening.
• Samples in the gazebo are to be collected from beneath the roof in the rafters.
• Samples collected in the bathroom are to be taken near the ceiling.
• All gas monitoring is to be performed when the atmospheric pressure is below 29.92
inches of mercury
• Barometric pressure should be recorded in table format in the field along with the other
monitoring results.
CONRAD G:oscar.Ncr•. CORP.
MI Page I of 2
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
October 2, 2000
Dense fog, 50 deg F; B.P. _
29.8"Hg
Project#
CW000100 - 3`d Q 2000 Gas Monit
CBB
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wap inger
STATEON ID
Inches Hg
%CH
%LEL
%02
Time
GV -1 - above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1126
GV -1 - inside
>5
>100
14.2
GV -1 - below
1.9
39
20.3
GV -2 - above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1121
GV -2 - inside
0
0
20.9
GV -5 - above
29.80
0
0
20.0
1041
GV -5 - inside
0
0
20.0
GV -6 - above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1133
GV -6 - inside
0
0
20.9
GV -7 - above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1136
GV -7 - inside
>5
>100
11.2
GV -7 -.below
.5
10
20.9
GV -8 - above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1130
GV -8 - inside
>5
>100
9.1
GV -8 - below
4.8
97
19.5
GV -1 I- above
29.80
0.05
1
17.5
1104
GV -11 - inside
0
0
0
GV -12- above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1038
GV -12 - inside
0
0
20.9
GV -13 -above
29.80
0
0
0
1040
GV -13 - inside
0
0
0
GV -15 -above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1138.
GV -15 -inside
0
0
20.9
Gum ENI 5
ffr I
IL�1 CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Page 2 of 2
Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
October 2, 2000
Dense fog, 50 deg F; B.P. _
29.8°Hg
Project#
CW000100 - V Q 2000 Gas Monit
CBB
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill - Wa in er
STATION ID
inches H
%CH
%LEL
0/602
Time
GV -16 -above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1039
GV -16 - inside
0
0
20.9
GV -17 -above
29.80
0
0
20.9
1128
GV -17 -•inside
0.2.
4
20.7
GV -17 - below
0.85
-17
20.9
PV -2
29.80
0
0
28.9
1103
Gazebo
29.80
0
0
20.9
0840
�.VmIVIr_N I J
%LEL levels above 25% are bolded
Samples from trees are taken at the roots
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Invoice
8 Ra and Avenue
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 DATE
Phone 914.454.2544
Fax 914.454.2655 11/15/2000
BILL TO
Town of Wappinger
POBox 324
Middlebush Road
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
DATE ITEM
11/8/2000 Lump Sum
CGC File #
CW000100
DESCRIPTION
Gas Monitoring - Castle Point Landfill- 3rd Q 2000
QTY
e
INVOICE '#
1086
RATE AMOUNT
483.00 483.00
Total $483.00
TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NY
P.O. Box 324, Middlebush Road
Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 12590
PURCHASE ORDER & VOUCHER
r�nrr L1�.SLt ie17 r
CLAIMANT'S &)o /� ���
NAMEF nC{ (i tJC,
ADDRESS
P
L
s TERMS
7
Purchase
Order No,
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS BOX
Date Voucher Received.
FUND - APPROPRIATION
AMOUNT
TOTAL �� t
Abstract No.
Vendor's
Ref, No.
Description of Materials or Services Unit Price Amount
L&YvAll HDAIIJ4'�j
"'. L
correct; that the items, services and disbursements
taxes from which the municipality is exempt; are not
_
4) 1?
Date
� a?3 IDD I W3 f bo
TOTAL I YF3 106
CLAIMANT'S CERTIFICATION
certify that the above account In the amount of $��'Is true and
were rendered to or for the mun cipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that
an Mat the amo laime actually d
4'. V 4is &ni
Signature Title
(Space Below for Municipal Use)
N./
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT
This claim is approved and ordered paid'-om the appropriation indicated.
The above services or materials were rendered or furnished to
the municipality on the dates stated and the charges are correct.
DATE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL
DATE11 AUDITING BOARD
1
EXISTIN!NEn
,-� TOP OF CA
(ten j
�o
Ld
Y
_z
c BENCHMARK
? SOUTI1wEST CORNER
OF MONUMENT--�
x ASSUMED ELEVATION
U 100.0
'Carr
0
AL
GV -6
O r
TREELINE
(TYP.)-
0
A
GV -7
colt4 UN4c FENCE (TY.
NoT Tb {
jC0'!NCRE7E
; 3 CAs1NG=69�,S
PAD 6z
1,
O
IBALLFIECD
Lu
��
OL
WL
PMW -kio-
R P OF C67.68CONCRETE 65.41N oT �TEST�
x
z
0
]� NoT To W-
0
0 Tt=—.STl:—O
PMw — 5
TOP OF CASING - 68.02
CONCRETE PAD .+ 63.56
CONCRETE
MONUMENT
l ANDFII.L CL1l1Tffi P(6011FCT
FINAL `/1S -- BUILT"
_o0.,
+•
TVMME 011,
puTca couNrYiv t1oR1t
�`•
PAGGI do MARTIN
Consulting
Engfnems & Land Surveyors
54-56 1AAIN STREET
A Q
/'�v
PITON OI(g 11-4K}EE4P71 17B 6%F/ro(g i 4) 4701 � 0905
! � ? �.J
CONRAD GEoscIENCE CORP.
E#vim&mmta! Seim&ts
August 22, 2000
Andrew Lent
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 - 914/454-2544 - fax: 914/454-2655
RECEIVE]
AUG 2 9 2000
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation ELAINE SNOWDEN
21 South Putt Corners Road TOWN CLERK
New Paltz, New York 12561
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report, 2nd Quarter 2000, Castle Point Landfill;
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Lent:
Conrad Geoscience Corp. has completed groundwater monitoring for the second quarter
of 2000.in accordance with the 1999 Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual for the
above referenced facility.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On April 26, 2000, Conrad Geoscience conducted quarterly groundwater sampling. Two
on-site monitoring wells, PMW-8 and PMW-9, and the on-site supply well, SW -1, were
scheduled for testing for 1993 baseline parameters as defined by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6)
and the USEPA Method 8021 STARS.
Monitoring Well MW -8 is 25 feet deep, and is completed in the unconsolidated unit along
the down -gradient perimeter of the landfill. Monitoring Well MW -9 is 59.6 feet deep, and is
completed in bedrock along the down -gradient perimeter of the landfill. Supply Well SW -1 is an
up -gradient bedrock well used to supply water to on-site facilities.
Prior to sampling, static water level elevations were measured in each of the two
monitoring wells (PMW-8, PMW-9). PMW-8 could not be sampled due to an obstruction
approximately 3 feet below grade. Conrad Geoscience personnel purged between 3 and 5 well
volumes prior to sample collection from PMW-9. Physical water quality parameters were
monitored during purging and are summarized on the attached sampling sheet. Samples were
collected from PMW-9 using a dedicated polyethylene bailer. Samples from SW -1 were collected
from the tap located in the utility room of the on-site maintenance shed before the water softener.
Water samples were shipped to Columbia Analytical Services for analysis of baseline parameters
as defined by part 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(d)(6) and USEPA Method 8021 STARS.
RESULTS
Water quality results are summarized below. All results are summarized in the attached
tables, and excerpts from the analytical report are appended. A complete analytical report is on
file with Conrad Geoscience.
CAConad Ceosdencelew0o010012Q2900gw,wpd
Castlepoint Landfill
File ff CW000100
August 22, 2000
Page 2
Monitoring Well PMW-8
An obstruction at a depth of approximately 3 feet prevented sample collection.
Monitoring Well PMW-9
No volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in samples collected from PMW-9.
The following metals exceed NYSDEC groundwater standards in PMW-9: Iron, manganese,
sodium and zinc. Two other inorganic parameters exceed the NYSDEC standard in PMW-9
(color and Total Organic Carbon.)
Supply Well SW -1
No VOCs were detected in samples collected from SW -1. The following inorganic
compounds exceed the NYSDEC groundwater standards in SW -1: Iron, magnesium, sodium and
zinc. Of these, only iron and zinc exceed the NYSDOH drinking water standard. No other
inorganics exceed the NYSDEC standard in SW -1.
Re -installation of Monitoring Well PMW-8 is tentatively scheduled for September 2000.
The existing well will be decommissioned in accordance with NYSDEC requirements. If you
have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Christopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/erb
attachments
cc: Peter Paggi - Paggi, Martin and DelBene w/ attachments
Town Clerk - Wappingers Falls w/ attachments
Dutchess County DOH w/ attachments
CACOMd Ge09dMW\CWW010M2Q2900gw,vgd
CONRAD GEOSCIENM LORI'.^ r
Castlepoint Landfill
File 9 CWOOO 100
August 22, 2000
Page 3
Table I Groundwater sampling results for SW -11 and MW -9- Volatile organic compounds via
USEPA Method 8260 and 8021 STARS; collected April 26, 2000 at Castle Point
XLandfill, Town of Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File # CW0001 00
jChemical Constituent
NYSDEC SW -1
Limit:
MW -9
y
Acetone
20
20U
20U
Acrylonitrile
100
1000
100U
Benzene
5
5U
5U
Bromochloromethane
5
5U
5u
Bromodictiloromethane
5
5U
5U
Brornoform
5
SU
su
Brornornethane
5
5U
5U
2-Manone (MEK)
10
IOU
IOU
Trans -1, 4Dichloro-2-biAene
6
5U
5U
Carbon Disulfide
10
IOU
IOU
Carbon Tetrachloride
5
5U
5U
Chlorobenzene
5
5U
5U
Chloroethane
5
5U
5U
Chloroform
5
5U
5U
Chloromethane
5
5U
5U
1, 2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
5
su
5U
Dibroinochloromethane
5
5U
su
1, 2-Dibrofnomethane
5
5U
5U
Dibromomethane
5
SU
51J
1, 4 -Dichlorobenzene,
5
5U
5U
1, 2 -Dichlorobenzene
5
5U
5U
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
5
BU
5U
1, 2-Dichloroethane
5
5U
5U
1, 2-Dichlorodhene
5
5U
5U
Trans -11, 2-Dichlorothene
5
5U
SU
CIS -1, 3-Di,hloroethene
5
5U
5U
C'.\Coumd Geosdenoe1CW0001 0012Q2000gw.wpd
CONRAD GposcIENCP CORP.
Castlepoint Landfill
File # CW000100
August 22, 2000
Page 4
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC
Limit
SW -1 MW -9
1, 2-DichlorDpropane
5
5U
51.1
Cis -1, 3-Dichloropropene
5
5U
5U
Ethylbenzene
5
51-1
5U
lodomethane
10
IOU
IOU
Methylene Chloride
5
5U
5U
4Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK)
10
IOU
IOU
Styrene
5
51-11
5U
1, 1, 2, 2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
5U
5U
1, 1, 1, 2 -Tetrachloroethane
5
5U
5U
Tetrachloroethene
5
5U
5U
Toluene
5
5U
5U
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
5
5U.
5U
1, 1, 2 -Trichloroethane
5
5U
5U
Trichloroethene
5
5U
5U
Trichlorofluoromethane
5
5U
5U
1, 2, 3-Trichlorapropane
5
5U
5U
Vinyl Acetate
10
IOU
IOU
Vinyl Chloride
5
5U
5U
M+P-Xylene
5
51.11
5U
0 -Xylene
5
5U
SU
Notes:
I - Standards according to 6NYCRR Part 700-705;
All concentrations are in ppb (ug/L) unless otherwise indicated;
U= Not detected, detection limit listed;
Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standard,
CXonrad Cheosdwm1CW0001 00\2Q20DQgw.wpd . .:Cd..
ONRAD Gross oilp.;1-6
104— M
Castlepoint Landfill
File # CWOOO 100
August 22, 2000
Page 5
Table 2 Groundwater sampling results SW -11, and MW -9- Inorganic Compounds; collected
April 26, 2000 at Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger, New York; Conrad
Geoscience File # CW000100
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC
Limit
Method #
SWA MW -9
Class GA
Groun&jvater
Drinldng
Water'
........
...............
. ......... ...
... ..... . .... .... . . . ...
. - .... ...
.............
...... . .......
.... ....
"x"
............. .
. . ....................
.........................
Aluminum
NE
NE
6010
100U
386
Ammonia
2.0
NE
350.1
0,492
0.642
Antimony
NE
NE
6010
0.060u
0.060u
Arsenic
0.025
0.05
6010
0.010U
0.010U
BOD
NE
NE
405.1
4.76UJ
2U
Barium
1.00
2.00
6010
0.0693
0.103
Beryllium
NE
NE
6010
0.005U
0.005U
Boron
1,00
NE
6010
0.2001-1
0.259
Bromide
NE
NE
300
1U
1
Cadmium
0.010
0.005
6010
0.005U
0.005U
Calcium
NE
NE
6010
72.8
88.5
Chemical Oxygen Demand
NE
NE
410.4
51.1
5U
Chloride
250
250
300
3.36
11
Chromium
0.050
0.10
6010
0.010U
0.010u
Cobalt
NE
NE
6010
0.050U
0.0501.1
Color (Pt/Cl)
15 Pt(CI
Is Pt/Cl
110.2
5
20
Copper
0.200
NE
6010
0.122
0.020
Hexavalent Chromium
0.050
NE
7196A
0.01 U
0.01 U
Iron
0.300
0.33
6010
OA02
45A
Lead
0.025
NE
6010
0.0081 B
0.0058E
Magnesium
35.0
NE
6010
35.9
31.1
Manganese
0.300
033
6010
0.197
0.686
Mercury
0.002
0.002
6010
0.00031.1
0.00031-1
Nickel
NE
NE
6010
0,040U
0.040U
Nitrate Nitrogen
10.0
1 10
300
0,05U
0.05U
Potassium
NE
I NE
6010
5.0*
5.4*
C:\Conmd (6ow=cc\CW0W1 DO\2Q20OOgw.wpd
CONPAD GKOSUFN0 F CORP.
Castlepoint Landfill
File # CWOOO 100
August 22, 2000
Page 6
Chemical Constituent
NYSDEC Method
Limit
Class GA Drinking
Groundwater' Water.2
SW -1
MW -9
..... ....
.......... $
................
--------------.....
.........
..... .....
............
...
.... . ....
....... ..
...... .......... ..
.......... x
... ... .. -
Selenium
10
10
6010
0.005U
0.005U
Silver
0.050
0.050
6010
0.010U
0.01011
Sodium
20.0
NE
6010
25.0
22.2
Thallium
NE
NE
6010
0,0110IJ
0.01OU
Sulfate
250
250
300
46
70.6
Total Alkalinity
NE
NE
310.1
314
297
Total Cyanide
0.100
NE
335.4
0.01
0.01
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
160.1
428
456
Total Hardness
500
NE
130.2
369
404
Total lqeldahl Nitrogen
NE
NE
351.2
0.545
0.738
Total Organic Carbon
0,10
NE
9060
1 U
1.29
Tot al Phenolics
0.001
NE
420.2
.005U
ODSU
Vanadium
NE
NE
6010
0.050U
0.050U
Zinc
0.300
5.0
6010
0.0432
0.117
Notes:
I -Standards according to 6NYCRR Part 700-705;
2 - Standards according to NYSDOH Subpart 5-1
Uz Not detected, detection limit listed;
J=estimated value;
B--oompound found in blank;
All concentrations are in ppm (mg/L) unless otherwise indicated;
NE=Not Established;
Boldface Indicated those parameters which exceed NYSDEC standards.
)SCIENCECO P.
C,\Conmd 0e-0wiMcC\CW0D01 00\2Q2000gW.Wpd CON RAD GF(
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID : MW -9
VOLATILE ORGANICS
METHOD 8260B 360 BASELINE
Reported: 05/25/00
Date Sampled : 04/26/00 06:44 Order #: 371108 Sample Matrix: WATER
Date Received: 04/28/00 Submission #: R2001610 Analytical Run 50526
ANALYTE
DATE ANALYZED : 05/09/00
ANALYTICAL DILUTION: 1.00
PQL RESULT UNITS
ACETONE
20
20
U
UG/L
ACRYLONITRILE
100
100
U
UG/L
BENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMOFORM
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMOMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
2-BUTANONE (MEK)
10
10
U
UG/L
TRANS-I,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CARBON DISULFIDE
10
10
U
UG/L
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROFORM
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
DIBROMOMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,4 -DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2 --DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TRANS-I,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
ETHYLBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
2-HEXANONE
10
10
U
UG/L
IODOMETHANE
10
10
U
UG/L
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(MIBK)
10
10
U
UG/L
STYRENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1,2,2 -TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1,1,2 -TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TETRACHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TOLUENE
5.0
3.3
J
UG/L
1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1.,2 -TRICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
00
TRICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
:=;•UG/L
1,2,3--TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
VOLATILE ORGANICS
METHOD 8260B 360 BASELINE
Reported: 05/25/00
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID : MW --9
Date Sampled : 04/26/00 06:44 Order #: 371108 Sample Matrix: WATER
Date Received: 04/28/00 Submission #: R2001610 Analytical Run 50526
ANALYTE PQL RESULT UNITS
DATE ANALYZED 05/09/00
ANALYTICAL DILUTION: 1.00
VINYL ACETATE
10
10
U
UG/L
VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
M+P-XYLENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
O -XYLENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
SURROGATE RECOVERIES
QC
LIMITS
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
(86
- 115
%)
90
TOLUENE -d8
(88
- 110
%)
101
%
DIBROMOFLUOROMETHANE
(86
- 1.18
%)
108
0Q50
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project References CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID : SW -1
VOLATILE ORGANICS
METHOD 8260B 360 BASELINE
Reported: 05/25/00
Date Sampled : 04/26/00 08:22 Order #: 371107 Sample Matrix: WATER
Date Received: 04/28/00 Submission #: R2001610 Analytical Run 50526
rr`Pit
�•fr �
DATE ANALYZED : 05/08/00
ANALYTICAL DILUTION: 1.00
PQL
RESULT UNITS
ACETONE
20
20
U
UG/L
ACRYLONITRILE
100
100
U
UG/L
BENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMOFORM
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
BROMOMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
2-BUTANONE (MEK)
10
10'
U
UG/L
TRANS-I,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CARBON DISULFIDE
10
10
U
UG/L
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROFORM
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
DIBROMOMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,4 -DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2 -DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1--DICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TRANS-I,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
ETHYLBENZENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
2-HEXANONE
10
10
U
UG/L
IODOMETHANE
10
10
U
UG/L
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
4-METHYL--2-PENTANONE (MIBK)
10
10
U
UG/L
STYRENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1,2,2 -TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1,1,2 -TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TETRACHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
TOLUENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1,1 --TRICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
1,1,2 -TRICHLOROETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
0
TRICHLOROETHENE
5.0
5.0
U
0§
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0
5.0
U
-.;UG-/L
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
VOLATILE ORGANICS
METHOD 8260B 360 BASELINE
Reported: 05/25/00
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID z SW -1
Date Sampled : 04/26/00 08:22 Order #: 371107 Sample Matrix: WATER
Date Received: 04/28/00 Submission #: R2001610 Analytical Run 50526
ANALYTE PQL RESULT UNITS
DATE ANALYZED : 05/08/00
ANALYTICAL DILUTION: 1.00
VINYL ACETATE
10
10
U
UG/L
VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
M+P-XYLENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
O -XYLENE
5.0
5.0
U
UG/L
SURROGATE RECOVERIES
QC
LIMITS
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
(86
- 115
%}
90
%;
TOLUENE -d8
(88
- 110
%}
99
°s
DIBROMOFLUOROMETHANE
(86
-- 118
%)
106
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc
METALS
-1-
INORGANTC ANA 1,VCrC nATA .CHF.VT
Contract: 82001610
Lab Code: Case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
Al'lC1Yl�i NU .
MW -9
SAS No.: SDG NO.: MW -9
Lab Sample ID: 371108
Date Received; 04/28/00
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): pG/L
ICAS No. I Analyte Concentration I C I Q I M I
17429-90-5
1Aluminum
5.0 1 U
3861
17440-42-8
I I P I
17440-36-0
I Antimony 1
60.0 I U I I P 1
17440-38-2
1 Arsenic I
10.0 1 U 1 I P I
17440-39-3
(Barium I
103 I I 1 p 1
"1440-41-7
1 Beryllium 1
5.0 1 U
.P
17440-42-8
I Boron 1
259 I I
1 P 1
17440-43-9
I Cadmium I
5.0 1 U 1
I p I
17440-70-2
(Calcium 1
88500 I I
I P I
17440-47-3
I Chromium I
10.0 I U I
I P 1
17440-40-4
I Cobalt I
50.0 1 U 1
I P 1
17440-50-8
I Copper 1
20.0 1 U 1
I P 1
17439-89-6
1 Iron 1
45400 11
I P I
17439-92-1
1 Lead 1
5.8 1 39 1
I P I
17439-95-4
IMagnesium 1
31100 1 1
I P 1
17439-96-5
[Manganese 1
585 1 1
I p l
17439-97-6
I Mercury I
0.30 I U I
I CV 1
17440-02-0
I Nickel 1
40.0 1 U I
I P 1
17440-09-7
(Potassium I
5430 1 1
1 P 1
17782-49-2
I Selenium I
5.0 I U I
I P 1
17440-22-4
1 Silver 1
10.0 I U I
I P 1
17440-23-5
1 Sodium., 1
22200 1 1
1 P 1
17440-28-0
I Thallium I
10.0 I U I
I P 1
17440-62-2
I Vanadium 1
50.0 I U I
I P I
17440-66-6
I Zinc 1
117 1 1
1 P I
Color Before: YELLOW
Color After: COLORLES
Comments:
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Form I - IN
Texture:
Artifacts:
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc
METALS
-I-
INORGANIC ANAI.VQLC'IATA QWF.F.T
Contract: 82001610
Lab Code: Case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
0juli-r" Vu.
SW -1
SAS No.: SDG NO.: MW -9
Lab Sample ID: 371107
Date Received: 04/28/00
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): VG/L
ICAS No. - Analyte concentration I C I Q I M
[ 7429-90-5 1 Aluminum I 100 [ U [ [ P I
17440-36-0
I Antimony [
60.0 [ U [
[ P j
[ 7440-38-2
f Arsenic [
10.0 [ U [
[ P
1744.0-39-3
(Barium [
69.3 [ [
[ P
[ 7440-41-7
Beryllium [
5.0 [ U [
[ P
[ 7440-42-8
Boron [
200 [ U [
[ P
17440-43-9
f Cadmium [
5.0 [ U [
P [
17440-70-2
(Calcium [
72800 [ [
[ P
[ 7440-47-3
1 Chromium
10.0 [ U [
[ P
[ 7440-48-4
1 Cobalt [
50.0 [ U [
[ P
[ 7440--50-8
l Copper [
122 [ [
[ P
[ 7439-89-6
f Iron
402 [ [
P
[ 7439-92-1
f Lead [
8.1 [ B [
[ P
17439-95-4
(Magnesium [
35900 [ [
j P [
7439-96-5
(Manganese [
197 [ [
[ P
[ 7439--97-6
f Mercury [
0.30 [ U [
[ CV [
[ 7440-02-0
I Nickel [
40.0 [ U [
[ P [
17440-09-7
IPotassium [
5090 [ [
1 P [
[ 7782-49-2
I Selenium [
5.0 [ U [
[ P 1
17440-22-4
1 Silver [
10.0 [ U j
[ P 1
17440-23-5
ISodium 1
25000 [
j P E
[ 7440-28-0
I Thallium
10.0 [ U[
j P 1
[ 7440-62-2
1 Vanadium [
50.0 J U I
P 1
[ 7440-66-6
f zinc [
43.2 [ j
[ P
Color Before: GREY
Color After: COLORLES
Comments:
Clarity Before: CLOUDY
Clarity After: CLEAR
Form I - IN
Texture:
Artifacts:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Reported: 06/01/00
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID : MW -9
Date Sampled : 04/26/00 06:44 Order #: 371108 Sample Matrix: WATER
Date Received: 04/28/00 Submission #: R2001610
ANALYTE
METHOD
PQL
RESULT
UNITS
DATE TIMES
ANALYZED ANALYZED
DILUTION
AMMONIA
350.1
0.0500
0.642
MG/L
05/03/00
14:07
1.0
BOD -5
405.1
2.00
2.00 U
MG/L
04/28/00
08:00
1.0
BROMIDE
300.0
0.100
1.00 ❑
MG/L
04/28/00
18:11
10.0
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
410.4
5.00
5.00 U
MG/L
05/12/00
08:00
1.0
CHLORIDE
300.0
0.1.00
1.00 U
MG/L
04/28/00
18:11
10.0
COLOR (TRUE)
110.2
5.0
20.0
Pt/C1
04/29/00
10:35
NA
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
7196A
0.0100
0.0100 U
MG/L
04/28/00
11:49
1.0
NITRATE NITROGEN
300.0
0.0500
0.500 U
MG/L
04/28/00
18:11
10.0
SULFATE
300.0
0.200
70.6
MG/L
04/28/00
18:11
10.0
TOTAL ALKALINITY
310.1
2.00
297
MG/L
05/08/00
08:00
1.0
TOTAL CYANIDE
335.4
0.0100
0.0100 U
MG/L
05/09/00
10:00
1.0
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
160.1
10.0
456
MG/L
05/03/00
12:30
1.0
TOTAL HARDNESS
130.2
2.00
404
MG/L'
05/21/00
11:30
1.0
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
351.2
0.200
0.738
MG/L
05/12/00
13:39
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1..00
1.29
MG/L
05/10/00
13:44
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
1.28
MG/L
05/10/00
13:51
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
1.28
MG/L
05/10/00
13:59
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
1.30
MG/L
05/10/00
14:06
1.0
TOTAL.PHENOLICS
420.2
0.00500
0100500 U
MG/L
05/16/00
09:05
1.0
025
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Reported: 06/01/00
Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Project Reference: CASTLE POINT LF
Client Sample ID : SW -1
Date Sampled : 04/26/00 08:22 Order #: 371107 Sample Matrix: WATER
Date Received: 04/28/00 Submission #: R2001610
DATE
TIME
ANALYTE
METHOD
PQL
RESULT
UNITS
ANALYZED ANALYZED
DILUTION
AMMONIA
350.1
0.0500
0.492
MG/L
05/03/00
14:04
1.0
BOD -5
405.1
2.00
4.76
UJ
MG/L
05/17/00
10:50
2.4
BROMIDE
300.0
0.100
1.00
U
MG/L
04/28/00
17:59
10.0
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
410.4
5.00
5.00
U
MG/L
05/12/00
08:00
1.0
CHLORIDE
300.0
0.100
3.36
MG/L
04/28/00
17.59
10.0
COLOR (TRUE)
110.2
5.0
5.00
Pt/C1
04/29/00
10:35
NA
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
7196A
0.0100
0.0100
U
MG/L
04/28/00
11:49
1.0
NITRATE NITROGEN
300.0
0.0500
0.500
U
MG/L
04/28/00
17:59
10.0
SULFATE
300.0
0.200
46.0
MG/L
04/28/00
17:59
10.0
TOTAL ALKALINITY
310.1
2.00
314
MG/L
05/06/00
12:00
1.0
TOTAL CYANIDE
335.4
0.0100
0.0100
U
MG/L
05/09/00
10:00,
1.0
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
160.1
10.0
428
MG/L
05/03/00
12:30
1.0
TOTAL HARDNESS
130.2
2.00
369
MG/L
05/18/00
16:20
1.0
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
351.2
0.200
0.545
MG/L
05/12/00
13:38
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
1.00
U
MG/L
05/10/00
13:14
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
1.00
U
MG/L
05/10/00
13:22
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
1.00
U
MG/L
05/10/00
13:29
1.0
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
9060
1.00
1.00
U
MG/L
05/10/00
13:36
1.0
TOTAL PHENOLICS
420.2
0.00500
0.00500
U
MG/L
05/16/00
09:05
1.0
CONRAD
GEOSGIENCE
CORP.
Well Development; Log
PROJECT # CW000100
MONITORING WELL
MW -9(D)
WELL LOCATION S. CTRL.
DATE 04-26-00
INITIALS CBB
Total Depth
59.6'
Casing Diameter
Volume
per
Foot
Depth to Water -
15.22 (TOC)
Water Column =
44.38
2"
0.163
x Gallons per ft. Of Casing x
0.163A
4"
0.653
= Current Well Volume =
7.23
6"
1.469
x3 =
21.70
X5 =
36.17
TIME
pH
Conductivity
Turbidity
D.O.(mg/L)
T (°C)
Salinity
ORP
Ga!
(mS/Cm)
(NTU)
(%)
Purged
1428
9.05
0.160
84
3.23
12.1
0.00
-58
.5
1440
9.27
0.136
53
3.15
12.4
0.00
-85
3.0
1456
9.39
0.135
72
2.37
11.9
0.00
-70
5.0
1504
9.40
0.131
211
2.89
12.0
0.01
-101
6.0
1522
7.60
0.428
52
1.36
12.1
0.01
-33
8.0
1550
7.46
0.392
130
1.17
11.8
0.01
-36
15.0
1602
7.42
0.451
270
1.34
11.6
0.01
-24
20.0
1608
7.44
0.455
160
1.94
11.5
0.01
-34
21.0
1623
7.44
0.457
120
2.12
11.4
0.01
-28
22.0
1635 1
7.42
0.462 1
85
2.91
11.5
0.01
-33
23.0
Total Volume Purged/end purge
23 gallons
Comments: Water started out black
Purged Dry? No
Sampled? Yes
i
The Chazen Companies
PROJECT NAME: Castle Point Landfill
PROJECT No.: .49117.00
CLIENT: Wappingers Falls
WELL TYPE: Monitoring
WELL LOCATION: Wappingers Falls
CITY/TOWN: Wappingers Falls
COUNTY: Dutchess
STATE: New York
Locking Cap -->
ight of a
:k up: 2.30
3" Steel Casing
Cement
PMWB.XLS
Elevations:
Ground Surface Elevation: NA
Water Level Reference Point: NA
Water Level Reference Point Elevation: NA
Water Levels:
Date: 3/13/1996
Depth to Water: 9.81
WELL NO. PMW-9
Starting Date: 2129/96
Stop Date: 2.30/96
Method: Rotary
Contractor: Kendrick Drilling
Driller: TKJDW
Rig: Acker
Geologist: L. Zeller
s
s
a
a
�0 74.01
Brown f SAND, some Silt, trace f Gravel, wet, medium
++ dense
az
}$
14
is
to
17
14
is
Type:Stec
Diam.: 3"
'eight:
Fall:
im le Tube Core
SS I I NX
•I I
Page 1 of 3
a
c CStratum
and
A tis
m v
°'
Field Descriptions: Field Notes and Comments
Top Soil 0.3'
i
Grey -brown f SAND, some to little Silt, trace fm Gravel,
moist, medium dense.
s
s
a
a
�0 74.01
Brown f SAND, some Silt, trace f Gravel, wet, medium
++ dense
az
}$
14
is
to
17
14
is
Type:Stec
Diam.: 3"
'eight:
Fall:
im le Tube Core
SS I I NX
•I I
Page 1 of 3
The Chazen Companies
PROJECT NAME: Castle Point Landfill
PROJECT No.: .49117.00
CLIENT: Wappingers Falls
WELL TYPE: Monitoring
WELL LOCATION: Wappingers Fails
CITY/TOWN: Wappingers Falls
COUNTY: Dutchess
STATE: New York
3" Steel Casing
Cement
Rock Hole
Pmwg.XLS
Elevations:
Ground Surface Elevation: NA
Water Level Reference Point: NA
Water Level Reference Point Elevation: NA
Water Levels:
Date: 3/13/1996
Depth to Water. 9.81
22
23
24
za
26
27
28
29
m
ar
]x
32
34
as
sr
is
Bedrock - Grey Shale
Started coring at 35.6 feet
Core Run # 1
35.6 to 42.10
Recovery (inches) ROD%
77" 56%
Grey SHALE, hard, fine to medium grained, massive
quartz and calcite veins
Fracture at 41.80
WELL NO. PMW-9
Starting Date: 2129196
Stop Date: 2.30196
Method: Rotary
Contractor: Kendrick Drilling
Driller: TKlDW
Rig. Acker
Geologist: L. Zeller
Notes and Comments
Page 2 of 3
v
s s
Q
o,
E
+„- � s
o °u
V
� Stratum and
Field Descriptions:
sr
Weathered bedrock- Grey Shale
22
23
24
za
26
27
28
29
m
ar
]x
32
34
as
sr
is
Bedrock - Grey Shale
Started coring at 35.6 feet
Core Run # 1
35.6 to 42.10
Recovery (inches) ROD%
77" 56%
Grey SHALE, hard, fine to medium grained, massive
quartz and calcite veins
Fracture at 41.80
WELL NO. PMW-9
Starting Date: 2129196
Stop Date: 2.30196
Method: Rotary
Contractor: Kendrick Drilling
Driller: TKlDW
Rig. Acker
Geologist: L. Zeller
Notes and Comments
Page 2 of 3
The „Chhazen Companies
PROJECT NAME: Castle Point Landfill
PROJECT No.: .49117.00
CLIENT: Wappingers Falls
WELL TYPE: Monitoring
WELL LOCATION: Wappingers Falls
CITY/TOWN: Wappingers Fails
COUNTY: Dutchess
STATE: New York
Rock Hole
Elevations:
Ground Surface Elevation: NA
Water Level Reference Point: NA
Water Level Reference Point Elevation: NA
Water Levels:
d 9
w m
A E 3 u° '� Stratum and
O 3 y v Field Descriptions:
Date: 3/13/1996
Depth to Water: 9.81
41
♦2
Core Run # 2
i3
42.10 to 46.8
Recovery (inches) RQD%
44
'45" 35%
Grey SHALE, hard, fine to medium grained, massive
u
quartz and calcite veins
Fractures at 43.10, 44.00 and 46,80
46
Core Run # 3
47
46.8 to 53.6
Recovery (nches) ROD%
f°
80" 51%
*�
Grey SHALE, hard, fine to medium massive
grained,
quartz and calcite veins
so
Fracture at 50.00
si
52
53
Core Run # 4
u
53.6 to 59.6
Recovery (inches) RQD%
ss
72" 75%
Grey SHALE, hard, fine to medium grained, massive
quartz and calcite veins
57
Ss
N
59..6
WELL No, PMW-9
Starting pate: 2129196
Stop Date: 2.30196
Method: Rotary
Contractor: Kendrick Drilling
Driller. TKIDW
Rig: Acker
Geologist: L. Zeller
Notes and Cornments
PMW6.XLS
Page 3 of 3
APPROXIMATE PI
,
1 cfqlrv
F—
D
0
0
EXISTING WELL
TOP OF CASING = 109.4
U
z
x
z
z o BENCHMARK
SOUTHWEST CORNER
Q OF MONUMENT-`--�.
ASSUMED ELEVATION
U - 100.0
D°/
G�6
0 r P
TREELINE
(Typ)-
0
i .
GV -5
7
GV -1
�i
Q
del
A
GV— 7
NK FENCE s
NOT TO 13c--
T-%;;��
3c--T%;;��
PMW - 3
TOP OF CASING = 66.55
CONCRETE PAD = 62.60
A
0
IBALLFIELD
1�
U
Oe
® PMW — 4
TOP OF CASING - 67.68
CONCRETE PAD 65.47
N aT To L E
TEST
z
10
z
�U NaT To W
0 TSS TSD
PMW — 5
TOP OF CASINGE-$]&02CONCRETE PAD
CONCRETE
MONUMENT
LMOFLL
FlNA�L�OAS - gp UILj�'
SO - 00.7 4
,• _"
/kryy
w•w 1.rmvw L
OF WVPNM
DUTICHESS couiY WN YM
PAGGI do MARTEN
Consulting Engineers do Land Surveyors
54-56 MAIN STREET
EE
PHONE a 4)4771 7ag6E%FAXO(914) 471- 0905:
PAP.
`..
AB
GONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
8 Raymond Avenue
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Phone 914 / 454-2544 FAX 914 / 454-2655
FACSIMILE COVER PAGE
DATE: January 24, 2000
TO: Mr. Paggi
COMPANY: Paggi, Martin & Del .Bene LLP
FAX: 914/471-0905
CC:
FROM: John A. Conrad:
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet 2
MESSAGE:
In response to your Request for Proposal dated January 12, 2000, enclosed is our bid sheet for
Post -Closure Groundwater & Gas Monitoring at the Castlepoint Landfill. Please contact me if
you should have any questions.
I John A. Conrad
Confidentiality Notice
The information in this transmission is intended for the individual or entity named above. it may be legally privileged and confidendat if
you have received this information in error, please notify us immediately and send the original transmission to us by mad. if the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disdosure, dissemination, drsbibution or copying of this
communication or its contents is stdcdy prohibited.
PAGGI MARTIN & DEL BENEux.
CoTsuldng Engineers & L,and Surveyors
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
91447.1-7898 _.. -..__ .....
914-471-0905 (FAX)
•"6 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL*
DATE: January 12.2000
FROM: Paggi. Martin & Del Bene, LLP, Consulting Engineers
RE: Past.Closure Groundwater & Gas Monitoring
Castlepoint Landfill
Dear Contractor:
The Town of Wappinger is currently accepting proposals from -qualified firms to supply"Post-
Closure Groundwater and Gas Monitoring" at the Castlepoint landfill in conformance with
Sections "G" and "H" of the enclosed Post Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual
(PCMMM), Bid prices shall include all labor, materials, testing, etc. to perform the sampling
as outlined in the PCMMM.
BID ITEMS
TOTAL PRICE
ITEM SPECIFICATIONS QUANTITY BID PER
YEAR
■ Gas See Section "G" Quarterly Testing for a 1 1.92 3.00
:Monitoring i Herein i Ycar Period
• Groundwater See Section "H" Annual Baseline & S 6,724.00
Monitoring Herein Quarterly Routine Testing
for Three (3) Wells
* Assumes ASP"B" laboratory deliverables.
WELL [NIiORMATION:
• PN1'W-8: This is a 20.5', deep boring to be utilized to sample groundwater in the shallow
overburden. No pumping equipment or electric supply exists for this well.
• p_1►�IW-9; This is a 39,6 deep bcdrock well to be utilized to sample tate bedrock aquifer.
No pumping equipment or electric supply exists for this well.
• Existing, Well: This bedrock well is currently used as a production well to supply water to
the onsite bathroom facilities. It is equipped with a submersible pump, and there is a
readily accessible raw water sample tap located in the utility room of the bathroom
Facilities,
Joseph E. Psi}, Jr.. P.E. Emstmarrin, Jr., P.E., L.S. Charles 1L Det.Gene. Jr.. Y.E.
S �Et FAX H0, , .
P. 02
L GGETTF, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC.
FROFUSSIONAL GROUND-NwrmANI)
pNVIRONMI,•,NTAL ENGIN11,KRING SERVICES —
i 26 MONROE TURNPI KJ i
TRUMBULL, Gr 0hh 11
203-�sa,a 11r+J
FAX 203-45..;111 I
January 24, 2000
Mr. Peter paggi
Paggi, Martin, Del Bene UP
54-56 Main Strcut
1'rlughkccpsiu, NY 12601_ -- - -
RE: Post -Closure Ground -Water and Gas Monitoring
Casticpoint Land ll
Town of Wappinger, New York-
Dear
ork
Dear Mr, Paggi:
LcggLtte, Brashears & Grallam, Inc. is pleased to submit a cast proposal for post -closure Liound-
watcr and gas rnonituring at the Castlepoint I.andfill, located in the Torun of Wappinger, Ncw York. Our
cost proposal provided on the zittachcd forth is based upon specifications outlined in sections "G" and
"ki" of the Post -Closure Monitoring and 'Nfaintenance Manual (December 3, 1999). Please note that the
cos€ iJtclUdes prl parine a brief summary report with tabulated data that will be submitted to you each
quarter.
It you have any questions zire require adclitional information, please do not hesitate to contact me
or Tom Cusack at ( 03) 452-3100. We look onvard to rvorkiAz with you on this project.
Very truly yours,
1�1'1r,1-311A; HEARS & GRAHAM, INC.
aren R, Deswfanis, CI'G
Associate
,Affirlmcd by'
Robert Lainonica, (TG
President
1CU;cmp
Enclosure
H:\PR0F0SAL\2000\WAPP.wpd
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI RAWSY, NEW JMgrIY ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA TAMPA, FLORIDA
SIOUX FAra..S, SCAJT DAKOTA WU'T (31US11ilt, PMgNSYLVANIA 01MMS17ORD, MASSACHUNUTTS
WFIrrEJ?LAIN`1, NEW YORK AUS`i'1N,'t1:XAS MADISON, W=ONSIN HOU.S"MN. TEXAS
CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1)wchess County Office:
PO Box 3479, 229B Page Paris, Manchester Road
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603
Phone: (914) 454.3980 Fax: (914) 454.4026
Mr. Peter J. Paggi
Paggi, Martin, & Del Bene LLP
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, NY 1:2601
January 24, 2000
Orange County Office:
Phone: (914) 457-1521
Capital District Office:
Phone: (518) 371-0929
VIA FAX. • 914-471-0905
Pe: Castlepoint Landfill Post -Closure Groundwater
& Gas iYlorutoring- Proposal
Job # 00005.00
Dear Mr. Paggi:
The Chazen Companies (TCC) is pleased to provide the attached quote for the
landfill gas and groundwater monitoring programs at the Castlepoint Landfill,
Town of Wappinger, New York. The bids for these items were based on the
specifications provided in the "Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Manual,"
which was attached to your letter dated January 12, 2000.
TLC's gas monitoring costs are based on the assumption that drive points will
be installed at 100 -.Foot centers around the perimeter of the landfill. per NYSDEC
specifications. Sampling costs could be greatly reduced if permanent gas
monitoring wells are installed. Based on the documents provided, it was unclear if
such monitoring wells exist.
P-E1
ChaZtn Engineering & Land Su+rveying Ca,, P.C. C -"a n Chattn Environmmal Services, Inc.
ErtviroPlan Associates, Inc. COMES VtPlan Associates, Inc,
Castlepoint Landill
January 24, 3000
Page 2
We look Forward to the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please do
not hesitate to contact Jim McIver or me with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Jennifer L. Mancinelli
Environmental Scientist
cc: Jim McIver
Julie Taylor
Sharon Zampko
Castlepoint Landfill Proposal,doc
Castlepoint Landill
,January 24, 2000
Page 3
BID ITEMS
ITEM
SPECIFICATIONS I
QUANTITY
TOTAL
PRICE BID
PER YEAR
Gas See Section "G" Quarterly Testing
$10,000
Monitoring Herein ! for a I Year Period
• Groundwater
See Section "H"
.�mival baseline &
k
$9,500
Monitoring
Herein
Quarterly Routine
I
Testing for Three (3)
I
wells
I
CLIHLI(Ipolllt L.ulxlllll Proposul.11oc
PAGGI, MARTIN &. DEL BENE LLP
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
914-471-7898
914-471-0905 (FAX)
May 10, 2000
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, New York 12561
Attention: Andrew Lent
Reference: Castlepoint Landfill
Town of Wappinger
Dutchess County, New York
Dear Mr. Lent:
DECEIVED
MAY 18 ma
ELAINE SNOWOEN
"'OWN CLeRK
Please be advised that the Town of Wappinger has contracted with Conrad Geoscience Corp. to
perform quarterly routine/annual baseline water quality testing, and quarterly gas monitoring of
the above referenced facility. The first round of testing was conducted in mid-April, 2000,
The water quality tests results will be forthcoming as soon as they are available. Enclosed for
your review are the results of the gas monitoring operations, conducted by Conrad Geoscience
on April 19'', 2000,
Please note that four (4) of the gas vents sampled exhibited values in excess of 25% of the
Lower Explosive Limit (LEL).
Also enclosed for your review and approval are five (5) copies each of the final Post -Closure
Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCMMM) and a copy of the final As -Built Map,
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions or require additional
information.
Thankyou. for aur ideration in this matter.
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E.
JEP:PJP:Iaw
Enclosure
cc: Hon. Constance 0, Smith, Supervisor
Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman
Hon, Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman
Hon. Robert Valdati, Councilman
Hon. Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
Albert R Roberts, Esq.
Conrad Geoscience, Attn: Chris Brown
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. Ernst Martin, Jr„ P, E, I„5, Chrrles R. Del Bene, Jr., P.E.
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
Env;mnmental Scieft&lS
April 28, 2000
Peter I Paggi
Paggi, Martin & Del Bene, LLP.
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
8 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 • 914/454-2544 • fax: 914/454-2655
Re: Post -Closure Monitoring & Maintenance Program
Gas Monitoring :Report; Castle Point Landfill, Wappingers Falls,
Dutchess County, New York;
Conrad Geoscience File #CW000100
Dear Mr. Paggi;
Conrad Geoscience has completed the landfill gas monitoring at the Castle Point Landfill in
accordance with the 1999 Post Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Program.
On April 19th, Conrad Geoscience personnel measured the percentage of methane (CH4),
percentage of the lower explosive limit (LEL), percentage of carbon dioxide (CO2), and
percentage of oxygen (02) from 13 gas vents around the perimeter of the landfill (Figure 1).
Four of the 11 gas vents sampled exhibited values in excess of 25% of the LEL (GV -1, 7, 8, 15),
Percent LEL in the on-site building was 0.0%. Data from all gas monitoring points is presented in
the attached table.
Landfill gas monitoring for the second quarter has been tentatively scheduled for July 2000. If
you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP.
hristopher B. Brown
Hydrogeologist
CBB/ald
attachments
1341 CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Gas Monitoring Log
Date:
April 19, 2000
Weather:
500 F Overcast
Project#
CW000100
Personnel
C. Brown, N. Sturdivant
Project Name
Castle Point Landfill
NYSDEC
S ite#
STATION ID
Inches Hg
%CH
%LEL
%CO
%O
Time
GV -1
29.87
3.8
78
4.4
14.9
1359
GV -2
29.87
0.0
0.0
0.3
21.0
1406
GV -5
29.87
0.0
0.0
1.6
19.6
1411
GV -6
29.87
0.0
0.0
7.4
11.1
1454
GV -7
29.87
7.4
154
11.6
8.2
1450
GV -8
29.87
1.6
32
3.3
15.8
1458
GV -11
29.87
0.0
0.0
0.1
21.7
1437
GV -12
29.87
0.0
0.0
2.1
19.1
1432
GV -13
29.87
0.0
0.0
3.4
18.6
1416
GV -15
29.87
3.1
62
13.6
1.7
1443
GV -16
29.87
0.0
OA
1.8
20.2
1428
GV -17
29.87
OA
OA
0.7
20.2
1504
PV -1
29.93
OA
0.0
2.0
18.3
1404
PV -2
29.78
0.0
0.0
1.1
21.0
1424
Building
29.87
0.0
0.0
0.1
21.7
1513
COMMENTS
GV -7 - % methane as high as 8.4% = %LEL range 162 - 165%
POST -CLOSURE MONITORING & MAINTENANCE MANUAL (PCMMMI)
CASTLEPOINT LANDFILL
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK
APRIL, 2000
PREPARED BY:
PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
56 MAIN STREET
POUGHEKEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION:
PAGE
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION AND CONTACT LIST
1
B.
PROPOSED DEED REVISONS
2
C.
FUTURE USE OF THE PROPERTY
3
D.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
4
E.
SOIL COVER SYSTEM
5
F,
VECTOR ABATEMENT
6
G.
GAS MONITORING
7-9
H,
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
10-11
I,
LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM
12
J.
RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING
13
K.
RESOURCE :REQUIREMENTS
14
L.
CONTINGENCY PLAN
15
M,
FINANCE ASSURANCE CRITERIA
16
-TC-
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
The information contained herein is intended to constitute a Post Closure
Monitoring and Maintenance Manual (PCMM) in accordance with the
following:
• 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.15(k)(7).
• Order on Consent (case #3-143218707).
* Local Government Regulatory Relief Initiative.
• Final Revised Closure Plan, dated July 5, 1996.
Contact numbers are as follows:
1. Supervisor Constance O. Smith
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
(914) 297-2744
2, Recreation Department, Attention: Chairman Ralph Holt
Town of Wappinger
P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
(914) 297-0720
3. Paggi, Martin & Del Bene, LLP
Attention: Joseph E, Paggi, Jr., P.E.
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
54-56 Main Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
(914) 471-7898
4. Groundwater & Gas Monitoring Personnel
These services will be performed by qualified professional firms on an
individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger subsequent to an
informal bid process. Appropriate names and contact numbers shall be
provided to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) as they become available.
-1-
R PROPOSED DEED REVISIONS:
The deed for the Castlepoint Landfill shall be revised to indicate:
The general period of time during which the site was utilized as a landfill
(197-198)
• While an exact description of the wastes contained within the site is
unknown, a general statement shall be included indicating that the Town of
Wappinger utilized the site to dispose of items from individual residences
that were collected during Spring cleanup operations and yard wastes.
Available information from Town of Wappinger Highway Department
personnel indicates that metals and tires were separated during these
cleanup operations, and removed from the site for disposal elsewhere. Test
pits excavated by the Town prior to and during landfill closure operations
revealed wastes consistent in nature with such cleanup operations.
All existing records of the facility including all subsurface investigation and
test results have been filed with the N.Y.S.D.E.C.
The deed must reference a map which shall be filed with the Dutchess
County Clerk's Office which clearly indicates the limits of the landfilled
areas within the property boundary.
The deed must also indicate that the use of the site is restricted pursuant to
the provisions of 6NYCRR Part 360-2.15(k)(9).
-2-
C, FUTURE USE OF THE PROPERTY:
Subsequent land use of the landfill area by the Town of Wappinger shall be in
the form of community recreation. The site is designated for predominately
passive recreation activities, but also has provisions for playground activities,
children's summer camp, softball, etc.
Use of the property shall not disturb the integrity of the final cover, liners, or
any other components of the containment systems, or the function of the
monitoring or environmental control systems, unless necessary to comply with
the requirements of Section 360-2.20 of 6 NYCRR Part 360, The N.Y.&D.E.C.
must approve any disturbance and will do so only if the Town of Wappinger
demonstrates that disturbance of the final cover, liners or other component of
the containment system, will not increase the potential threat to human health or
the environment.
-3-
D. SURFACE DRAINAGE;
Final surface slopes range from a minimum of 4% to a maximum of 33% to
promote surface runoff while maintaining slope integrity, Interceptor swales
have been installed upgradient of the landfill mass to prevent surface waters
from draining across the top of the landfill surface. Said interceptor swales
shall be maintained so as to operate continuously and effectively.
The gentle slopes and the grass cover will minimize soil erosion from both
wind and rainfall. In addition, quarterly visual inspections of the site will be
performed to determine if any erosion has taken place. Upon identification, the
necessary remedial erosion control measures will be undertaken.
Said quarterly inspections shall be performed by Town of Wappinger
personnel, or their designated representatives, and the results submitted to the
NX.S.D.E.C. as part of the annual inspection report.
E. SOIL COVER SYSTEM:
The grass vegetative cover overlying the soil cap will be the primary means of
maintaining the integrity of the cap system.
Quarterly inspections will determine if any slumping or subsidence in the soil
cover has occurred. Any changes of an unnatural degree that may occur in the
vegetative cover, any ponding of rainwater on the surface, and any apparent
observation of leachate outcropping to the surface, any signs of soil erosion
such as channeling shall be noted on the quarterly inspection report forms, In
addition, the vegetative cover shall be maintained so as to prevent shrubs and
saplings from growing on the landfill cap and penetrating the cover.
Said quarterly inspections shall be performed by Town of Wappinger
personnel, or their designated representatives, and the results submitted to the
N.Y.S.D.E.C, as part of the annual inspection report.
-S-
F VECTOR ABATEMENT:
The primary method of vector control shall be through the installation of the
soil cap and topsoil cover, Secondarily, post -closure quarterly visual
inspections shall be conducted over the minimum post -closure period to
identify the presence of any vectors which may inhabit the landfill including,
but not limited to, rodents, insects, and birds. Should vectors be discovered
they shall be removed in a manner consistent with the N. Y.S.D.E.C. and other
recommended guidelines.
Town of Wappinger personnel or their designated representatives shall be
responsible for conducting the quarterly visual inspections and for
implementing any necessary vector control measures. The results shall be
submitted to the N.Y.S.D,E,C. as part of the Annual Inspection Report.
The site inspector shall observe any holes made by burrowing animals or other
evidence of the presence of vectors, If the landfill soil cap has been found to be
damaged it shall be restored to its original specification. Should the landfill
require any additional treatment for rodents, birds, or insect control, Region 3
N.Y.S,D.E.C. personnel, specifically the Pesticide Officer, shall be contacted to
approve any proposed extermination method prior to its implementation.
G. GAS MONITORING:
A soil gas survey was conducted at the Castle Point Landfill on February 13`'
and February 15"', 1996, Four soil gas points (GM -1 through GM -4_ and one
monitoring well (PMW-8) were field tested for volatile organic vapors,
methane, and explosive gases.
The soil gas points were constructed with 1/2 inch or 2" (ID.) PVC casing sealed
at the top with a rubber stopper. A plastic hose connector was inserted through
a hole in the rubber stopper and connected to a peristaltic pump via a length of
silicon tubing. A rubber stopper assembly was also connected to the other end
of the tubing at the discharge,
The peristaltic pump was used to draw air from the soil gas installation through
the silicon tubing. Air discharging from the soil gas installation was monitored
for organic vapors with an Hnu photoionization detector and for methane, %
LEL and 02 with a GasTech Meter.
To obtain reading from Well PMW-8, a 2 inch rubber cap equipped with a brass
hose connector was fitted on the well. Air readings were monitored by the
same procedures.
Results:
• Volatile, organic vapor levels were slightly above background levels.
Readings ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 Hnu units.
• There were no detectable readings .for % LEL or % gas (Methane)
02 levels ranges from 8.75% to 21%
A minimum of four gas vents per acre were constructed in the landfill. Gas
vent design meets the requirements of Part 360 except for depth penetration.
Gas vents penetrate to a depth acceptable to the Department, but not less than
six feet into the waste.
-7-
Post -closure explosive gas monitoring and maintenance shall be performed at
least quarterly to insure that:
a. Explosive gas levels do not exceed 25% of the lower explosive limit within
any structures on or off the site (except gas control or recovery system
components);
And
b. The level of subsurface explosive gas does not exceed the lower explosive
limit anywhere along the property boundary.
If monitoring shows these levels are exceeded, N.Y.&D.E.C. shall be notified
and remedial action, such as the construction of gas cut-off trenches, should be
immediately taken. In addition, this quarterly explosive gas monitoring and
maintenance shall assure that the gas vents are not blocked and that landfill gas
has not damaged the final cover. Post -closure explosive gas monitoring shall
include: subsurface monitoring along a perimeter outside the waste mass but
within the property boundary; monitoring within all onsite and nearby
structures; and inspection of the final cover and surrounding area. Perimeter
subsurface monitoring shall be performed at maximum intervals of 100 feet if a
portable explosive gas detector is used. Monitoring with a portable detector
shall be performed when the ground surface has been wet or frozen for several
days. Monitoring shall be done below the wet or frozen zone. If permanent gas
monitoring wells are constructed for perimeter subsurface monitoring, they
should be located at maximum intervals of 400 feet. Wells should be
constructed to a depth of 75% of the maximum depth of the waste mass below
the surrounding ground surface or to the seasonal low groundwater level,
whichever is higher. The bottom 213 of the wells should be screened.
H. GROUNDWATER MONITORING
The Town of Wappinger upgraded specific aspects of it's initial Landfill
Closure Plan to comply with the Part 360 regulations effective December 31,
1988 in an effort to secure State Assistance under the Environmental Quality
Bond Act (EQBA). Part of this upgrade included installation of two (2)
monitoring wells downgradient of the landfill in an effort to reduce future
environmental monitoring costs. This reduction in the sampling requirements
was detailed in a March 22", 1995 correspondence from Alan A. Fuchs, Solid
Waste Engineer -- Region 3 to Supervisor Constance O. Smith, which indicated:
"The N. Y.&D.E. (7. is willing to reduce the landfill's water quality sampling
requiremernts if two monitoring wells are added to the monitoring network
which are clearly capable of'detecting the landfill's water quality impact. The
proposed water -quality monitoring reduction is to decrease the required
number of sampling locations per sampling event from five to three monitoring
wells. The proposed program would include two monitoring wells
downgradient of the landfill and one upgradient monitoring location. "
The Town proposes to perform annual baseline and quarterly routine
monitoring of downgradient wells PMW-8 and PMW-9 and the existing
upgradient production well as indicated on the "As -Built" Plan. Said sampling
schedule would be conducted at this frequency until a minimum of ten (10)
rounds of test results are collected. After that time, and depending on the
results obtained, the Town of Wappinger may request that the N.Y.S.D.E.C.
modify the sampling and analysis requirements pursuant to the Local
Government Regulatory Relief/Initiative as follows:
Speci is Variance: Post Closure MonitoringI:
The frequency of post -closure groundwater, surface water and leachate
monitoring required by 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.15(i)(4) may be reduced from
annually for baseline parameters and quarterly for routine parameters to
annually for routine parameters and once every five years for baseline
parameters [See 6 NYCRR Part 360-2.11(c) (6)].
_10-
In addition, post -closure monitoring and maintenance shall include regular
inspection of the landfill final cover and surrounding area for cracks or stressed
vegetation which might indicate the escape of landfill gas. Areas where there
are cracks or where vegetation appears stressed shall be tested with a portable
explosive gas detector. Any areas of the final cover which may have been
damaged should be repaired and steps shall be taken, such as the installation of
additional gas vents, to prevent future damage, Areas around the waste mass
where gas is found to be escaping shall be tested with a portable explosive gas
detector to determine whether they indicate pathways by which explosive gas is
migrating offsite. If so, additional measures shall be taken to prevent offsite
migration, The percentage of explosive gas emanating from gas vents shall be
measured to indicate the effectiveness of the gas vents.
All gas monitoring shall be performed when the atmospheric pressure is low
(below 29.92 inches of mercury). Atmospheric pressure shall be recorded
along with the other monitoring results.
If the landfill is on a property that is sufficiently large as to preclude offsite
migration of landfill gas, then the perimeter explosive gas monitoring
requirements are inapplicable. In order to qualify for omission of the perimeter
monitoring requirements, the distance from the waste mass to the property
boundary must be a minimum of 1,000 feet or adequate onsite barriers to gas
migration must exist. A barrier to gas migration is either: a ravine or
excavation with its base extending as deep as the base of the waster mass, or to
very low permeability soils or seasonal low groundwater, or a surface water that
has flow all year, and which is indicative of groundwater elevation.
Said gas monitoring shall be performed by qualified professional firms on an
individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger subsequent to an
informal bid process, Results shall be submitted to the N.Y.S.D.E.C. as part of
the Annual Inspection Report.
Guidance:
This means that the frequency and cost of past -closure testing for
contamination would be significantly reduced. In order to qualify for this
variance, all of the following conditions should be met.
1. Contamination, except for leachate indicators, in down -gradient
groundwater monitoring wells does not exceed the groundwater standard or
background level, whichever is higher, for any contaminant.
2. The landfill is closed and maintained such that no surface leachate is
allowed to discharge from the facility; and,
There is no contamination of surface waters once cap construction is
complete.
4, The landfill should not be located over a sole source or primary aquifer,
Based on the post -closure monitoring results, N.Y.S.D.E.C. may require more
frequent monitoring at a later time.
Said water quality monitoring shall be performed by qualified professional
firms on an individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger subsequent
to an informal bid process, Results shall be submitted to the N.Y.S.D:E.C. as
part of the Annual Inspection Report.
Baseline and routine test parameters are as follows:
- 11-
LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM:
Leachate control systems have not been designed as part of this landfill closure
plan. The soil cap will prevent rainwater from infiltrating into the landfill mass,
thus restricting potential leachate development. The grading of the site, as
discussed in previous sections, will encourage surface water to flow off the
landfill mass and thus, prevent further leachate from forming.
During the quarterly visual inspections, leachate outcropping will be looked for.
If found, it will be immediately noted and proper engineering control measures
(as approved by the N.Y,S.D.E.C,) shall be implemented.
Said quarterly inspections shall be performed by Town of Wappinger
personnel, or their designated representatives and the results submitted to the
N.Y.S.D.E.C, as part of the Annual Inspection Report,
-20-
RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING:
Quarterly visual inspections of the site will be conducted by Town personnel or
their designated representatives for the minimum post closure period following
completion of the landfill closure. These reports will be filed at the Town Hall.
These inspections will include the soil cap and topsoil, venting system, site
drainage, specifically any items such as subsidence of the soil cap, areas of the
erosion, dead or dying vegetation, vandalism, and vectors will be reported
immediately to Town personnel followed by taking of corrective action. In
addition, qualified professional firms will be contracted with to perform
quarterly and annual groundwater duality and gas monitoring following
N.Y. S. D.E.C. protocols.
An annual report will be submitted to N.Y.S.D.E.C, which contains an analysis
of the groundwater quality sampling, gas monitoring and annual inspection
report by the Town of Wappinger identifying results of the quarterly visual
inspections, and any maintenance necessary during the year.
Copies of all said information shall be available for inspection at the Town of
Wappinger Town Hall.
-21-
K. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Quarterly visual inspections of the soil cap, vegetative cover, site drainage,
venting system, areas of subsidence, erosion, dying vegetation, vandalism and
vectors shall be performed by Town of Wappinger personnel or their designated
representatives,
The Town of Wappinger work force includes staff and equipment sufficient to
perform this work.
Quarterly water quality and gas monitoring shall be performed by qualified
professional firms on an individual contract basis with the Town of Wappinger
subsequent to an informal bid process. The names and contact numbers of said
professional firms shall be provided to the N.Y,S.D.E.C. as they become
available.
-22-
M. FINANCIAL ASSURANCE CRITERIA;
The Town of Wappinger is in the process of securing bids for quarterly water
quality and gas monitoring services as detailed herein. Upon final acceptance
of a qualified professional firm, the estimated yearly costs to perform the
prescribed work will be submitted to the NX.S.D.E.C.
All other work will be performed on a force account basis by Town personnel.
The Town of Wappinger owns and will continue to own the Castle Point
Landfill site, and will be financially responsible for post -closure monitoring and
maintenance.
-24-
En
Q
I°
Wal
APPROXIMATE
�n11
C pir ) I C "20 1 r
0
EXISTING WELL
TOP OF CASING = 109.4
u
0
Lit
U
w
z
BENCHMARK
z SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF MONUMENT -
X ASSUMED ELEVATION iv
U JOO.O
GV -6
0 P
TREELINE
(TYP.)-
0
/*5
i A
GV -5
ads
� ♦ r
GV -13
OQ
4z
A
GV -7
Not' Tt) 13E
TlZSTlr=0
PMW - 3
TOP OF CASING = 66.55
CONCRETE PAD - 62.80
A
0
J BALLFIELD
JU
0�
® PMW - 4
TOP OF CASING = 67.68
ON
CCRETE PAD 65.41
N OT" To >�
TEST
x
z
f0
I
z
Q
U A07 TO (3r--
0 T'FSTW
PMW - 5
TOP OF CASING - 68.02
CONCRETE PAD - 65.58
CONCRETE
„ MONUMENT
�~ 0��
}L4NOML CLASM BIaRO,,IBCi _ W
TM OF VAN11110111M lu.
DUTCHIlm coum all? YM
cr+A~ss PAGO do MARMN
ConsuRing Engineers & Land Surveyors AB
U-56 MAIN STREET
POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601
PHONE (914) 471-7898/FAX (914) 471-0905 ! s J
Memo
To: Hon. Constance O. Smith, Supervisor
From Peter J. Paggi
CC: Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman
Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman
Hon. Robert Valdati, Councilman
Han. Elaine Snowden
Albert P. Roberts, Esq.
Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E.
Date: January 26, 2000
Re: Castlepoint Landfill /Post Closure Monitoring
At the Board's request, this office issued a January 12th, 2000 Request for Proposal to perform Post -
Closure Groundwater and Gas Monitoring at the Castlepoint Landfill. The results of said solicitation are
as follows:
• Page 1
GAS MONITORING
GROUNDWATER
FIRM
MONITORING
Quarterly Testing for
Annual Baseline &
1 Year Period
Quarterly Routine Testing
(3 Wells
■ Conrad Geoscience
$ 1,923.00
$ 6,734.00
■ Leggette, Brashears & Graham
$ 2,500.00
$ 6,750.00
$10,000.00
■ The Chazen Companies
(Assumes Installation of
$ 9,500.00
Drive Points
• Page 1
Constance O. Smith
Town Board Member
Re: Castlepoint Landfill/Post Closure Monitoring
January 26, 2000
It should be noted that these quotes are for yearly monitoring costs, and that after a certain number of
tests are perfomtied a reduction in the frequency of testing may be requested from the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation. This reduction would only be granted if no groundwater
contravention was noted.
It is the opinion of this office that, upon final approval of the Post Closure Monitoring Manual by the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the above work should be awarded to the low
bidder, Conrad Geoscience.
Please feel free to contact this office is you have any questions or comments.
Thank you.
Peter J. Paggi
PJP:Iaw
0 Page 2