Loading...
Castle Point Landfill Closure Test ResultsELAINE SNOWDEN TEST RESULTS TOWN CLPTIK CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONSTRUCTION QUALITY CONTROL (CQA/CQC) CASTLEPOINT LANDFILL CLOSURE PROJECT TOWN OF WAPPINGER DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK NOVEMBER 23, 1998 [QUA7 PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 54-56 MAIN STREET POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 TEST RESULTS CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONSTRUCTION QUALITY CONTROL (CQA/CQC) CASTLEPOINT LANDFILL CLOSURE PROJECT TOWN OF WAPPINGER DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK NOVEMBER 23, 1998 PREPARED BY: PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 54-56 MAIN STREET POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM SECTION • MAP OF TEST LOCATIONS (I" - 60') M • TEST PROCEDURES/PROTOCOL TP • CLAY BARRIER LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION 1 (SOURCE -- SOUTHERN DUCHESS SAND & GRAVEL) • BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION 2 QUALIFICATION (SOURCE - KARTA CONTAINER) • TOPSOIL LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION 3 (SOURCE - KARTA CONTAINER) • CLAY BARRIER LAYER - ONSITE "TEST PAD" RESULTS 4 • INSITU CLAY BARRIER LAYER 5 • CHANGE ORDER NO. 3: ADDITIONAL CAP AREA -CLAY LAYER 6 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3: ADDITIONAL CAP AREA - BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER • BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION 7 QUALIFICATION (SOURCE - WEST HOOK SAND & GRAVEL) • INSITU BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER 8 • TOPSOIL, SEED AND FERTILIZER INFORMATION 9 TC- 1 SECTION M: MAP OF TEST LOCATIONS (1" - 64') x W 7 ADDITIONAL c.A•p AREA AS Pm � tl35 oG 132 � gP4 .GfBG • CI31 nr7mr,HMARK 50' x 50' CLAY BARRIER LAYER "TEST PAD" ,rte N0I- ALL �sT i =C-4, onI eF fir Inr . Vs I i LANDFILL CLOSURE PROJECT TEST LOCATIONS CASTL EPOINT LANDFILL TOWN OF WAPPINGER DUTCHESS COUNTY NEW YORK PAGGI & MARTIN Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 54 -56 MNN STREET POUGHKEEPSIE. NEW YORK 12601 TIL - �, 1 1 SECTION TP: TEST PROCEDURES/PROTOCOL . HCC PHONE IUB. : 914 E2S26Z may. 20 1998 25: 28PM P2 ur fA:l 4 1115 1 Moo, ,T Adw nye Te ting ompa7n lric: ■ • 22 8afati W04 ( r'ICC PHONE NO. May. 20 1996 05:129PM P ,.. a. . • a... 6VViVV' fif/Y V%�� ���ivG %0003 HIMSaN CANYON CONTRACt3-44 7mr P L7z$ MAY 20, 1M 2. At'oe>cbM Limits DetermimatWn Test Method: AMA D43 18 (Slime as AASHT0 T99 ad T190) The specdcetxo= taR fo ASTM D424; this parooedure was changed alightly sad was renumbered to D4318 several YOUS ap• General procedure: The sW sample is pied so that 100% passes the W, (0.425 mm) siava. Distiited mW is added until the sail has a pasty eonsistemy. Tlx Liguid Limit of the soil is de=iacd by spm Riling the soil in the cup of the liquid limit devit'c, a grmm is made in the soil, and the device is op=ted so that it drops the cup onto a rawtion =face ootid the Voova closes over a distgnm of I/a incl. A sample is mmoved from the closed paxtiou of the groove, weikhed_dried, and mv+eigh4 and its moimze const is da-raa"ned The moisture cotant in percent is ft liquid rim:it The Plastic Limit is determined by wiling the soil into a 118 mail diameter nbben cm a gmund glass: plate. The nbbon of sail is remolded and the procdcs is repeated until tba soil crumbles when rolling is attompbed The moisture cowzat of the crumbled soil is tea detemAzed. The moisture content in percent is the Plastic Limit The Plasticity Inl= is derwrmmed by 3u#rtracting the Plastic LiWit value from, the Liquid Limit. 3.11lobture Content Test Method. ASTM D2216 (Same as AASMO 7255 maul T265) General Procedure: The soil sample is weighed and placed. in'an oven at 230 4/. 90P. After sovmvj hoots the Soil is weighed and placed back in the overt. It is re -weighed as one hour intervals tenth a, crmst= weight is otiwued. The mois=t coatant is determined by divi&4 the loss of water wtio by the dry wei0t of the soil. 4. Maximum Density and Optimum MOWM Content Demrminai d0A Teat method: ASTM Dog {Soma as AASrM T99j cnernl Proceduro: This is the "SuLadard Proctor Method." The soil is pvpared by T=Dving arty `oversie' mat eria.l as specified, and is air dried to a moishne torment below o nitron if it wen mceived in a wet aonditk a Pout or t= ideaticai su 4ampias aze split oa and wxtcr is added so that each sample has a diffi=at moisture content. Bach sub -ample is compaab d in the Proatvr moU- tate sad is plauxd in a ia3rcr in the mold and is compacted with 25 blows (*r nth+.: 4 i=h &=wter maald) of the 5.5 pcmd Proctor hnmmor dropping 12 iacbes• Two addiidoaal layers are compacmd the sate way, lesvimg the soil stacking up slightly above the tap of the votumotria section Offt =4 The soil is struck off level with die top of the mold and is ward, A mu* is therm recovered from the weighted cow soil and its MW*Ue content is detemir&d Tho wet density of eat trw of the pmetor test is demmined by dividing the weight of the sod by tha voh=c of the =oid. The dry danait., is determined by di%dins t1as wet density by *a morstuxe cam= fagot. The Proctor points aro plotted on a graph of dry density versus rnouwe come= the Maximum Dry Density is the highest point on the curve, and 2 ti M��C PHONE NO. : 9147629%Z M 1 ego 05 0 a.yµ �Y Vlu .{;/Y.`�Ai���l��b'li May. �© 1. � GAS. �JOPi"! �� 1 1A G Cpp4 +' SitTI}SON C L4YoN CONTRAC=4U, MAY 20,1998 COMUM Moistum is the moisture c0nbw t cotrc40ndms to the Aft== Day D4=jty. If more than 5% `oversize' material was semavcd when pouring the test N=P* tim: V* cestih is Canumd based oa tim amovm of avcrsisc rmd its specific gravity. S. Ltterax1 Angs of PrioOM and Cohasku Test Metha& ASTM D3080 GeOergl P!roccdtu+o: The soil prcpe=ed to tate desired moisbRt+e court auj is =npacted to tbo required density in a 12 by 12 incb `shear box' which allows hori=nW r,0v=eat across the costar of the specimen. A c:omsramt normal (vertical) farce is applied to the top of the sample, and the sem* is sheared by appl*g at �n�_= =8 horiz (shear) Earns. The �maxinstuEn horizaaral ft+rce applied when oheaar f dt.av is reached is determined, and the peak shear- force versus mo:mal load is plotted oa a gmph- Two more tads are pesfoeracd with diff=cat normal fomes applied. when the three tests aro plotted, a line is drawn through them. The y -intercept of this liar is au estimate of the force rewired to sh= the sample with no naamai *= appliod, and is te Cahesioa. the slops of the line is equal to the tangent of tib- itt wrW angle of friction. For this test the e*pmedt is sun by a cafmputer, whit 4 also collects aetd stoma the data for eva]uadom i 6. Permeahiliey Test Ndctho&, ASMI D5084 General Procedure: A cylindrical sample of sail app vximi y 2.8 inches in diameter is placed in the test mss; the appw-&a iuclud" porous plata tbart cantact the tap and bottom of the specimen and which am- connected to water acd buret, The sk6 of the speCiurtett and the porous places ate covered by a thio latex mambra=ie, and the spaea sumil acbm the specimen is filled wish wamr. The sample is saturated by the water iz the burettes as the pressure in the syswin is iaacreamed incnmeantlly ova several hours. Increasing the pressure aluial-% any air bubbles trapped in the soil, and they are repjw4d by water. This prod is continued until the sample 13 sex 100% womagdL At this paint a slight difference in presaatre between the two bumttes is set using precision reSdatoss. The px "mw is the bm v**, the volume of flour into and out of the sample, the aiapsed time and th,c temperature are rocoamled =W costaat rm& ace vbW=%L 'F'lze pmmeabnility is determined by mWvplymg the v6lutne of flow by the length of the sample, and dMding than quantity by the doss-nWonai arca of the sample, the time, sad di the pmsura Z==ttal across the sample. Tjw result is eonvoled for ons M tarnparatme, and the density acd nmo*istwe ccnient of the mmmple an also da turmmed. FIELD TESTS Teat Mkhod: STM D2922 and D3017 Gte*tal ProaedLro: Field twting is Peed for may, pmt comgmcdon, and raoW=z contantT using a mwkw mossWre density tuBe� The pW is cak'bratod =.sag at the start of each day's work, and is Paicd� calibrated in the lab using a MS'T- traceabla standaatd. A lel test ams shout one foot square is prepared and a hof- is driven 3 i HCC FHCNE NO. : 9147628863 May. 20 1998 05:31PM P5 Vu, .V�au I+ry L j . U 0 ri1 ;111014 AvvANc:s,'. S'1 n 81000 HUD= CANYON CONntACMG TEST PROCEDLWS MAY20,19" into the soil to the depth desired The audar moigum-dmsfty Sou is pkwd w tete surf ft and its dewity probe is wwrbW mto the bale t,D the inquired depth. The ipsw eet's eyrie is sftruKL apd two deEmmn record ,tadtaison ommtg ons sensor ro=ds the count of gamma mdisdon amitted by the tip of the probe winch passes dwough the soil to the U*mmeat, far de*mInasim of the scdl's wet density. The second sensor records the ntunbcr of neutrons tW area emifted by a wum in the hwaunum and rct=ted bank by water molecules in taw sent. An internal microprocessor celauiatea thea soil's wet density, moisture oantent, and dry d=kty, add percent compaction is determined by dividing the dry• dendty by the maxJ,nnnat dwmty from the Procter t=L Additional tests of field condition.-; are made by performing the above described laboratory testa on sampdas ob mead irrthe ft6i Please c=mct me if you have =y questions or regent add&tionel information. Yours Wily, Kevin L. Patton, PS - Laboratory Director 4 SECTION I: CLAY BARRIER LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION (SOURCE - SOUTHERN DUTCHESS SAND & GRAVEL) CLAY BARRIER LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA I FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. PARTICLE SIZE #1 D422 100% < 1,' 100%<1" 1 PASS N/A PARTICLE SIZE #2 D422 100% < 1" 100%<1" 2 PASS N/A PARTICLE SIZE #3 D422 100% < 1 " 1 00%< 1 • 3 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #1 D4318 PLASTIC P. 1. = 6 4 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #2 D4318 PLASTIC P. 1. = 2 5 PASS NIA ATTERBERG LIMITS #3 D4318 PLASTIC P. 1, = 7 6 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 1 D2216 N/A 2.5.5% 7 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 2 D2216 NIA 12.6% 8 NIA pass NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 3 D2216 NIA 16.8% 9 PASS N/A MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 106.7 LBICF @18.2,% 10 PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE #1 MXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 108.0 LB/CF 1 1 PASS N/A OPTIMUM MOISTURE #2 @ 17.1% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 106.8 LBICF PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE #3 @16.5% 12 DIRECT SHEER TEST #1 D3080 N/ASEE SHEET 13 PASS N/A DIRECT SHEET TEST #2 D3080 NIA SEE SHEET 14 PASS N/A DIRECT SHEET TEST #3 D3080 N/A SEE SHEET 15 PASS NIA -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST 1 D5084 1.0x 10 cm/sec 2.3X10 16 PASS NIA cm/sec 5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST 2 D5084 1.0 x 10 cm/sec 4.2x10 cm/sec 17 PASS N/A 5 .-6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST 3 D5084 1.0 x 10 cm/sec 8.4 x 10 18 PASS N/A cm/sec srz 0 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Gradation Analysis Client Hudson Canyon Construction ATC Lab # 97-1082A Project Castle Point Landfill Project # 970210 Source Southern Dutchess S & G Sample Date 10/14197 Sample Type Clay Barrier By 3. Maley Sample Location Stockpile Tested Date 10/15/97 Specification 3.01.2A By M. Seidman Code: e I.0 Lab No, 97-1082A Sieve %Ret % Pass Spec. 1" 0.0 100.0 100.0 112" 0.0 100.0 1/4" 0.0 100.0 #4 0.1 99.9 #10 0.4 99.5 420 0.7 98.8 #30 0.5 98.3 940 0.9 97.4 #80 7.1 90.3 #200 8.9 81.4 Pan 81.4 0.0 SAG 1 0 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Gradation Analysis Client Hudson Canyon Construction ATC Lab # 97-1082B Project Castle Point Landfill Project # 970210 Source Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel Sample Date 10/14/97 Sample Type Clay Barrier By J. Maley Sample Location Stockpile r : Tested Date 10/29/97 Specification 3.01.2A 1 T By J. Mattia Comments Code: Lab No. - 97-1082B Sieve %Ret % Pass Spec. 11. 0.0 100.0 100.0 112" 0.0 100.0 114" 0.0 100.0 #4 0.4 99.6. #10 0.5 99.1 420 0.9 98.2 #30 0.6 97.6 #40 0.9 96.7 #80 8.6 88.1 #200 12.0 76.1 Pan 76.1 0.0 Minus -200 By Wash SAG I A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Gradation Analysis Client Hudson Canyon Construction ATCLah # 97-1082C Project Castle Point Landfill Project # 970210 Source Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel Sample Date 10/14/97 Sample Type Clay Barrier By J. Maley Sample Location Stockpile Tester! Date 10/29/97 Specification 3.01.2A By 1. Mattia Comments: Code: Lab No. . 97-1082C Sieve %Ret % Pass Spec. i" 0.0 100,0 100.0 112" 0.0 100.0 114" 0.0 100.0 #4 0.2 99.8 #10 0.6 1 99.2 920 0.9 1 98.3 #30 0.6 97.7 #40 0.8 96.9 #80 3.3 93.6 4200 6.2 87.4 Pan 87.4 0.0 Minus 9200 By Wash SAG 3 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-160.0 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction ATC Project No.: 970210 Date: October 16, 1997 Project: Castle Point Landfill Source: Southern Dutchess S & G Lab No.: 97-1082A Item: Clay Barrier Date Sam led: 10/14/97 by: J. Male Date Tested: 10/16/97 by: R. Patton Atterberg Limits Test Method: ASTM D4318/AASHTO T89, T90 Results Lab No. 97-1 82A Sec. Liquid Limit 25 Mastic Limit 19 Plasticity Index 6 Notes: Report Reviewed by: �Viooy_—) [Wi.+4 4 0 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Client: Hudson Canyon Const. ATC Project No.: 970214 Date: November 7, 1997 Project: Castle Point Landfill Source: South Dutchess S & G Lab No.: 97-1082B Item: Clay barrier layer Date Sampled: 10/14/97 by J_ Male Date Tested: 11/7/97 by; M. Manzo Atterberg Limits Test Method: ASTM D4318/AASHTO T89, T90 Results Lab No. 97-1082B Sec. Liquid Limit 20 Plastic Limit 18 Plasticity Index 2 Motes: Report Reviewed by: _ kA.,U) HWI-ne 5 A" T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Client: Hudson Can on Construction ATC Project No.: 970210 Date: October 30, 1997 Project: Castle Point Landfill Source: Southern Dutchess S & G Lab No.: 97-1082C Item: Clay barrier layer Date Sampled: 10/14/97 by: J. Male Date Testers: 10/30/97 by: C. Devlin Atterberg Limits Test Method: ASTM D4318/AASHTO T89, T90 Results Lab No. 97-1082C Sec. Liquid Limit 28 Plastic Limit 21 Plasticity Index 7 Notes: Report Reviewed by:'"� u.a.oe A f T C October 16, 1997 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill 115 Devries Avenue PROJECT NO.: 970210 N. Tarrytown, NY 10591 ATTN: Mitch Berkey NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT ITEM: Clay Barrier SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand and Gravel ( SAMPLED BY: J. Maley on October 14, 1997 TESTED BY: J. Lynch on October 15, 1997 LAB NO.: 97-1082A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 25.5% nud1oau► A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 November 10, 1997 Hudson Canyon Construction 115 Devries Avenue N. Tarrytown, NY 10591 ATTN: Mitch Berkey PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill PROJECT NO.: 970210 MOISTURE CONTENT ITEM: Clay Barrier SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand and Gravel SAMPLED BY: J. Maley on October 14, 1997 TESTED BY: J. Lynch on November 10, 1997 LAB NO.: 97-1082B NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 12.6% hvk692h Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■. 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall,NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 November 10, 1997 Hudson Canyon Construction 115 Devries Avenue N. Tarrytown, NY 10591 ATTN: Mitch Berkey PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill PROJECT NO.: 970210 MOISTURE CONTENT ITEM: Clay Barrier SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand and Gravel 1 SAMPLED BY: 1. Maley on October 14, 1997 TESTED BY: J. Lynch on November 10, 1997 LAB NO.: 97-1082C NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 16.8% hw 1062c ig A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. 22 Sarah Wells Trail 0 Campbell Hall, NY 10916 0 (914) 496-1600 0 FAX 496-1398 CLIE14T.Hudson Canyon Construction ATCPROJECTNO.: 9'70 --z-/' PROJECT: 97-1082A ATC LAB NUMBER 97--1082A SOIL ID NUMBER CL -5 TEST PERFORMED: MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATIONSHIPOE SOIL (PROCPORTESi') = mmoD_ ASTM D698, Method A rrF3& Clay barrier -Layer SOUELCE. Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel DATE SAMPLED: 10/ 14/97 SAMPLED BY;J. Maley DATETESTED 10/21/97 'SEI} BY -JI Percoski RESULTS OF PROCTOR MOISTURE-DE1V= TEST 107 106 105 104 103 Visual Description Brown clayey sand silt Test Maximum Dry Dcuity : 106.7 Test Optimum Moisture Content 18.2 P=erttOvrrsi= Particles: N/A Specific Gravity of Ove rsizt::N/A CorrectedMaxintumDry Density. N/A Corrected Opt. Moisture Content: N/A 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT lblcUJL •/a WAR ye INDIVIDUAL TEST POINT'S PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DEAWTY 14.4 103.1 1 17.9 106.6 I 19.2 106.1 21.2 103.9 to Samples are prepred by the "der method sod compacted usmg a manual. mmaer. Whey the coded of"oversize" p"des ateeeds SIL, rest :< corrected per ASTM D471& The specific gvvrty of the oversize way be detetmmed frvm test ( am report,) from ensha6 dart or may be ea00984 / A I f S } { r P y r a ti Aviv :nce rtes# rig: C-ompa:nc. 22 Sarah Weiss Trail 0 Carriomll Hall, NY 10916 0(9'14) X496-1600 0 FAX 496-1398 C CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction ATO PR03ECi'NO.: 970210 PROIEL-r Castle Point Landfill ATCLABNUMBER 97-1082B SOIL M NUMBER . CL -6 'TEST PERFORMED: MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATIONSHIP OF SOIL (PROCTOR TEST ) 'L'TMEMODr ASTH D698, Method A [IEk Clay.., barrier layer es SOURCE, Southern Dutchs Sand:&:Gravel DATE SAM. TLED- Uctober =1k, 199T ` " SAh1PLED-BY J.. Maley ':DA'IETESTED- October 27t .1997,, 'T SLED BY: Q. De lin RESM.=OFPRO=R AIOLM7RFDENSITY TEST Vis13a1 tiM Brown clayey sandy silt. 8 O w U_ 1019.. U w W 108 A p107 a 106 z wn 105 x 104 15 1 b 17 18 19 20 21 22 Ted Ma xi mu n Dry Density: 108.0 Vdcu.R Test Optic= Moisture Content 17.1 % Peroant Ovrssze Partides: NIA % Specific Gravity of Ovcasize: N/A Cerrcaedhlaadn.wmDryDensity_ NIA 9VCZLJt Cometed Opt. Moistiu a Content. NIA WDIVIDUAL TEST POINTS PJ:RC EW A 015TEME nu DENV77 15.7 105.0 16.4 107.4 18.0 107.5 21.0 104.0 I MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT t k Steles as prepared by die "drf method mad oompeKted wing a mead rimer- Wbeo the tooted of'aversiae" pariiclec eacads 554, remkes az corrected per ASTM D4711L Mm specdw gravity of d,e oversize away be determined from ted (see repast) liom cximl� dmbk or ­eY be csim.ted � Adv.ance:Te.'st�ng::,C'ora�p:a-n, lnc. T 22 Sarah Wells Trail 0 Campbell Hall, NY 10916 0 ('914) 496-1 OM 0 FAY 498.1398 CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction ATC PROJECTNO.: 970210 PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NUMBER 97-1082C SOEL -M NUMBER CL -7 TEST. PERFORMED: MOISTURE -DENSITY RELAMONSKIP OF SOIL ( PROCTOR TEST ) KESTMETHOD; ASTM D698, Method A ITEM: Clap barrier layer SOURCE: Southern DdtchessSand &74raiel DATE.SAMPLED:October 14,.1997.' 'SAMPLED:BY:• J. Maley .DATETE.STED: October • 27, 1997.. TESIED'BY M': ' Cieeden • RESDLIS OFPROCTOR MOISTURE DENS= TEST VisualDesc dption: Brown clayey sandy silt. Test Madmum Dry Density: 106.8 lb/cuA Test Optimum Moisture Content 18.5 % Percent Oversize Par icles: N/A % Specific Otavity of Oversim: N/A CorrectedMmrimmsDry DoWtyr N/A &/ctcjt Cariected Opt Motsttae Content N/A % 107 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 INDIVIDUALTEST POINTS PERC1LNr 1 VZ5TURE DRi DEN= 17.0 105.5 17.6 106.2 19.0 106.6 22.3 101.8 MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT 12m 3amp1es arrp mpwvd by the -drr method and coimpocted mag a m0ml r emaw_ Whey the codent of"ova vLze- p",cics eoxeds 5%. tensbs are eomx*cd per ASM D4718. The apecdw gsvitr of the ovenrLm may be ddammcd 6rom test ( see report) from C3 1i dstiL or may be ctti�\ fiAIA Q i.., a ft ] Advance Testing Company, Inc. CLIENT Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NO. 97-1082A TEST PERFORMED: Direct Shear Test of Solis Under Consolidated Drained Conditions TEST METHOD: ASTM D3080, Using Boart- ear LG -114 12"x12" Apparatus ITEM: Clay Barrier Layer SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel.(CL-5) DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/97 SAMPLED BY: James Malley DATE TESTED: ll / 7, 10 / 97 1 TESTED BY: Kevin Patton SUMMARY OF DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION, ¢, DEGREES 42.80 TANGENT 0 (phi) 0.925 COHESION C sf 278.5 SUMMARY OF TEST DATA Test results do not comply with specifications. Reviewed by: TEST NUMBER: 1 2 3 NORMAL STRESS, psf 144 288 576 MAX. SHEAR STRESS, psf 443 498 827 HORIZ_ DISPLACEMENT AT MAX. SHEAR 0.150 0.238 0.539 PERCENT MOLSTURE,.IMTIAL 13,78 13.78 13.78 PERCENT MOISTURE, FINAL 13.74 13.76 13.72 DRY DENSITY, PCF, NMAL 96.03 96.03 96.03 DRY DENSITY, PCF, AT TEST 96.57 96.80 97.31 THICKNESS, INCHES, INITIAL 5.031 5.031 5.031 THICKNESS, INCHES, AT TEST 5.003 4.991 4,965 DISPLACEMENT RATE in/mm 0.01 0.01 0.01 Beak Shear vs. Normal Stress Vertical vs. Horizontal OWpheement w low 0.12 a 8W 06 11 0.1 OA 600 0 �-` 1 psi N 0�6 r` 400 a 0.04 —� 2 psi N t � p 002 —a— 4 psi N y 0 m 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 a -0.02 -0.04 Normal Stress, psf Horiz. Dispi., Inches Shear Stress vs. Displacement 1000 1 900 800 w a 700 1 psi N w L 600t 5M �- 2 psi N 400 -..— 4 psi N r 300 N 200 100 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 Horizontal Displacement, Inches Test results do not comply with specifications. Reviewed by: I Advance Testing Company, Inc, 713 C—k IA/ -]I- -r—;I I. f`U-41 PI\/ Innis - In A AnC_i Cnl1 CLIENT Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NO. 97-1082B TEST PERFORMED: Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions TEST METHOD: ASTM D3080, Using Boart-Lo ear LG -114 12"xl2" Apparatus rMM: Clay Barrier Layer SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel (CL -6) DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/97 SAMPLED BY: James Malley DATE TESTED: 11/11-12/97 TESTED BY: Kevin Patton SUMMARY OF DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION, o, DEGREES 36.10 TANGENT o (phi) 0.730 COHESION. C of 359.0 .91T fUARV f1F TF.CT DATA TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 NORMAL STRESS, psf 144 288 576 MAX. SHEAR STRESS, psf 495 523 795 HORIZ. DISPLACEMENT AT MAX. SHEAR 0.118 0.353 0.385 PERCENT MOISTURE, INITIAL 18.37 18.37 18.37 PERCENT MOISTURE, FINAL 18.35 18.35 18.130 DRY DENSITY, PCF, INITIAL 97.20 97.20 97.20 DRY DENSITY, PCF, AT TEST 97.67 97.67 97.96 THICKNESS, INCHES, INTITAL 4.979 4.979 4.964 THICKNESS, INCHES, AT TEST5.003 5..003 5,003 DISPLACEMENT RATE in/min 0.01 0.01 0.01 Peak Shear vs. Normal Stress Vertical vs. Horizontal Displacement .- 1000 0.07 800 0.06 AF 600 €0.004 0.d —+-1 psi N 400 'c. 0.0:3 —2 psi N 2011a p 0.02 �� 4 psi N s 0 0.07 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 -a01 Normal Stress, psf Horiz. Dispi„ Inches Shear Stress vs. Displacement 900 800 700 a a � �--1 N �D psi 400 —2 psi N m 300 t 77 —4 psi N z w 200 100 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 7.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Horizontal Displacement, Inches Test results do not comply with specifications. Reviewed by: �� A i, T Advance Testing Company, Inc. ME nn A - U-11 I,IV 4- C - 1-4 . % AAC iGIIA CLIENT Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NO. 97-1082C TEST PERFORMED: Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions TEST METHOD: ASTM D3080, Using Boart-Longyear LG -114 I2 -x12" Apparatus ITEM: Clay Barrier Layer SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel (CL -7) DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/97 SAMPLED BY: James Malley DATE TESTED: 11112-13/97 TESTED BY: Kevin Patton SUMMARY OF DIRECT SHEAR TESTRESULTS ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION, o, DEGREES 41.70 TANGENT o (phi) 0.891 COHESION C, j2sf 321.5 Zf7TA, UA RV /1F 7wvr nATe Test results do not comply with specifications. Reviewed by: JS7 TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 NORMAL STRESS, psf 144 288 576 MAX. SHEAR STRESS,. psf 448 581 834 HORIZ. DISPLACEMENT AT MAX. SHEAR 0.247 0.226 0.602 PERCENT MOISTURE, INITIAL 17.47 17.47 17.47 PERCENT MOISTURE, FINAL 17.43 17.39 17.39 DRY DENSITY, PCF, R4MAL 96.12 96.12 96,12 DRY DENSITY, PCF, AT TEST 96.50 97.17 97.38 THICKNESS, INCHES, INMAL 4.547 4.547 4.547 THICKNESS, INCHES, AT TEST 4.529 4.498 4.488 DISPLACEMENT RATE in/mm 0.01 0.01 0.01 Peak Shear vs. Normal Stress Vertical vs, Horizontal Displacement 1000 0.1 N CL 800 0.06 V1 m 600 L 0.06 —1 psi N y 400 a 0.04 --� 2 psi N m 200 2 0 �— 4 psi N s 0 0.02 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 > 0 -0.02 Normal Stress, psf Horiz. Displ- Inches Shear Stress vs. Displacement 12M 1000 CL w 0 800 � 1 psi N 600 2 psi N _m— 4 psi N a r to 400 200 0 0 os 1 1,S 2 Z5 3 Horizontal Displacement, Inches Test results do not comply with specifications. Reviewed by: JS7 I A Advance Testing Company, Inc. T C■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Carnpbeil Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill PROJECT NO.: 970210 SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT ATC LAB NUMBER: 97-1082A TEST PERFORMED: Traixial Permeability Test Using Backpressure TEST METHOD: ASTM D5084 ITEM: Clay Barrier SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand and Gravel DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/97 SAMPLED BY: J. Malley DATE TESTED: 10123-24197 TESTED BY: Kevin Patton PROCTOR TEST DATA TEST METHOD: D698 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, PCF: 106.7 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT. 18.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD: SOIL CLODS BROKENICHOPPED TO PASS <112 -INCH SIEVE. COMPACTED IN 1 cm LIFTS, SCARIFIED BETWEEN LIFTS. TEST SAMPLE DIMENSIONS BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST HEIGHT, cm: 8.69 8.38 DIAMETER, cm: 7.35 7.42 MOISTURE CONTENT, %. 20.30 21.17 DRY DENSITY, PCF: 105.41 107.23. PERMEABILITY TEST CONDITIONS TYPE OF WATER USED: Tap Water EFFECTIVE STRESS, PSI (MINIMAX): 4.7515.68 MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE: 71.0 psi INITIAL DEGREE OF SATURATION: 91.5% HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 6.6 FINAL DEGREE OF SATURATION: 99.9% Specific gravity 2.70 (EST.) PERMEABILITY TEST RESULTS COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY AT 200C (68°F ) k20 = 2.3 x 10-6 CM/SEC SPECIFICATION: k2o = 1.0 x 10-5 CM/SEC TEST RESULTS COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATION THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHOD REFERENCED. PERMEABILITY VALUES ATTAINED UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS WILL BE INFLUENCED BY COMPACTION DENSITY, COMPACTION MOISTURE CONTENT, COMPACTION EQUIPMENT USED, VARIATIONS IN MA RIAL, P EPARATION METHODS, SUBGRADE CONDITIONS, WEATHER, AND OTHER FACTORS. REPORT REVIEWED BY: I A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 o (914) 496-1600 CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: PROJECT NO.: SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT Castle Point Landfill 970210 ATC LAB NUMBER: 97-10828 TEST PERFORMED: Traixial Permeability Test Using Packpressure TEST METHOD: ASTM D5084 REM: Clay Barrer SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/97 SAMPLED BY: James Malley DATE TESTED: 1114-5497 TESTED BY: Mike Creeden PROCTOR TEST DATA TEST METHOD: D698 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, PCF: 108.0 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT: 17.1 SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD: SOIL CLODS BROKEN/CHOPPED TO PASS 1/24NCH SIEVE. COMPACTED IN 1 cm LIFTS,_ SCARIFIED BETWEEN LIFTS. TEST SAMPLE DIMENSIONS BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST HEIGHT, cm: 10.20 8.80 DIAMETER, cm: 7.30 7.70 MOISTURE CONTENT, 96: 13.25 20.20 DRY DENSITY, PCF: 102.61 106.89 PERMEABILITY TEST CONDITIONS TYPE OF WATER USED: Tap Water EFFECTIVE STRESS, PSI {MINIMAX}: 3.2114.78 MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE. 67.8 PSI INITIAL DEGREE OF SATURATION:, 55.7%* HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 10.9 FINAL DEGREE OF SATURATION: 94.5%" Specific Gravity - 2.70 (EST.) PERMEABILITY TEST RESULTS COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY AT 2000 (680F) k2o s 4.2 x 10-6 CMISEC SPECIFICATION: k2o = 1.0 x 10-5 CMISEC Maximum TEST RESULTS COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATION THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHOD REFERENCED. PERMEABILITY VALUES ATTAINED UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS WILL BE INFLUENCED BY COMPACTION DENSITY, COMPACTION MOISTURE CONTENT, COMPACTION EQUIPMENT USED, VARIATIONS IN MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHODS, SUBGRADE CONDITIONS, WEATHER, AND OTHER FACTORS. 41100M REPORT REVIEWED BY: ti—� Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 C CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: PROJECT NO.: SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT Castle Point Landfill 970210 ATC LAB NUMBER: 97-10826 TEST PERFORMED: Trabdal Permeability Test Using Packpressure TEST METHOD: ASTM D5084 ITEM: Clay Barrier SOURCE: Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/97 SAMPLED BY: James Malley DATE TESTED: 11145-197 TESTED BY: Mike Creeden PROCTOR TEST DATA TEST METHOD: D698 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, PCF: 106.8 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT: 18.5 SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD: SOIL CLODS BROKEN/CHOPPED TO PASS 112 -INCH SIEVE. COMPACTED IN 1 cm LIFTS SCARIFIED BETWEEN LIFTS. TEST SAMPLE DIMENSIONS BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST HEIGHT, cm: 9.97 9.72 DIAMETER, cm: 7.27 7.31 MOISTURE CONTENT, %: 20.0 25.83 DRY DENSITY, PCF: 95.77 97.22 PERMEABILITY TEST CONDITIONS TYPE OF WATER USED: Tap Water EFFECTIVE STRESS, PSI (MINIMAX): 5.3016.36 MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE: 68.3 PSI INITIAL DEGREE OF SATURATION: 71.0%* HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 7.3 FINAL DEGREE OF SATURATION: 95.090* Specific Gravity a 2.70 (EST.) PERMEABILITY TEST RESULTS COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY AT 2000 ( 68OF } k2o a 8.4 x 10-6 CM/SEC SPECIFICATION: k2a a 1.0 x 10-5 CMISEC Maximum TEST RESULTS COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATION THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHOD REFERENCED. PERMEABILITY VALUES ATTAINED UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS WILL BE INFLUENCED BY COMPACTION DENSITY, COMPACTION MOISTURE CONTENT, COMPACTION EQUIPMENT USED, VARIATIONS IN MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHODS, SUBGRADE CONDITIONS, WEATHER, AND OTHER FACTORS. „.„" REPORT REVIEWED BY: �— r SECTION 2: BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION (SOURCE - KARTA CONTAINER) NOTE: THE MATERIAL FROM KARTA CONTAINER WAS NOT USED. INSTEAD, THE BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH MATERIAL FROM WEST HOOK SAND AND GRAVEL. THIS PRE -QUALIFICATION IS SUPERCEDED BY SECTION 7 HEREIN. SOURCE: KARTA CONTAINER BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION NOTE: THE MATERIAL FROM KARTA CONTAINER WAS NOT USED. INSTEAD, THE BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH MATERIAL FROM WEST HOOK SAND AND GRAVEL. THIS PRE-GULIFICATION IS SUPERCEDED BY SECTION 7 HEREIN. -2A- ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA / FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. PARTICLE SIZE #1 0422 WAN LIMITS SEE SHEET 19 PASS NIA PARTICLE SIZE #2 D422 WAN LIMITS SEE SHEET 20 PASS N/A PARTICLE SIZE #3 D422 WAN LIMITS SEE SHEET 21 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #1 D4318 WIN LIMITS PtNOW 22 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #2 D4318 WIN LIMITS 22 PASS N/A POW ATTERBERG LIMITS #3 D4318 WIIN LIMITS NOW 22 PASS N/A PLASTIC NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 1 D2216 N/A 22.1% 23 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 2 02216 N/A 21.8% 24 NIA PASS NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 3 D2216 N/A 23.3% 25 PASS N/A MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ 0698 PROCTOR 92.9 LBICF @22.2.% 26 PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE #1 MXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ 0698 PROCTOR 92.7 LBICF27 PASS N/A OPTIMUM MOISTURE #2 017.0% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 92.9 LBICF PASS N/A OPTIMUM MOISTURE #3 @20.2% 28 DIRECT SHEER TEST #1 D3080 N/ASEE SHEET 29 PASS N/A DIRECT SHEET TEST #2 D3080 N/A SEE SHEET 30 PASS N/A DIRECT SHEET TEST #3 D3080 N/A SEE SHEET 31 PASS N/A NOTE: THE MATERIAL FROM KARTA CONTAINER WAS NOT USED. INSTEAD, THE BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH MATERIAL FROM WEST HOOK SAND AND GRAVEL. THIS PRE-GULIFICATION IS SUPERCEDED BY SECTION 7 HEREIN. -2A- O1,'«1;'9.9 L1:Zi '8`9I -I �9t3 I�i1a ADVANCE TESTI\; Advance Testing Company, Inc. T c■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Profart Sow= Mpk rype 7k L4cado" Gradation Analysis son Canyoa Construction Casdc Poia[ Landf!U Kama Container I3amer Prowetion Stockptilc 4.012-201A Lab No. 97-924A Revised Sievc %F= % Pass Sperm Y" 0.0 I00.0 100.0 2" 0.0 100.0 IS' 0.0 100.0 I' 0.6 99.4 Sly 1.7 97.7 1!7-" 4.I 93.6 114' 83 85.4 30-65 4 5S 79.9 10 15.4 64S 120 I5.7 45.8 X50 7.7 4LI O40' 82 32-9 =80 16.8 16.1 4200 7.5 s.6 0-40 Pae 8.6 0.0 Minus j2Q0 S_r• Wash SAG ATC Lab 9 97-924A Rcv Profca T 9707-10 ale Dare 9110197 By C. Dcvliu Tasted Date 9119197 B ! L Lvnch N 01%2/98 11:21 $914 196 1593 ADVANCE TESTING VAoo A 7 C .Advance 'testing Company,," In.c. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail * Campbell Hail, NY 10916 * (914) 496--1600 Gradation Analysis Mod Hudson Canyon Constn=oa ATC La* # 97-924B Revised Projcc7 Castle Point F aadhIl Project A 970210 Source Karts Container scruple Date 9110/97 .Semple Type Barrier Protection By C. Deviia savwr a Lacon stockpile T'eted Dote 9116197 Spa fz=riou 4:Oi? 2-01A By J. Lyaci Lab Na. ' 97-9248 Revised Sieve 11/cRet %Pass Spw. 4^ 0.0 1.00.0 10010 0.0 100.0 S" 0.0 100.0 1^ 0.0 100.0 3/4" 7.0 93.0 lR" 7.4 85.6 114" 13.9 71.7 30-65 =4 5.6 66.1 x`10 123 53.8 720 12.0 41.5 s30 53 36.5 y40 5.9 30.6 780 t 8.4 121 #200 71 5.0 0-30 Par 5.0 0.0 Code: SAG 6aft'. 01-1121,1198 11:25 V913 396 1194 ADVANCE TESTIN(; Q OOf3 { T Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Welts Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Gradation Analysis Hw son Canyon Construction .LTC Lab 9 1-97-924C Revised Projori C3sde Point Landfill P.Ojra : 970210 semi= Kula Coiner Sa7MLE Date 9/10197 i $ahv a Tppc awrierpmtectioa $y sm"weLOC=Wn SLOckpile DevDev SFa�iemon 4,01-2-2.0 Teadrd D� - lin 0lA L6/977 Lab No. 97-924CRevised Codes MmK Sieve %Ret %Pis Spec 4" 0.0 too -0 100.0 2" 0.0 100.0 t 3 0.0 100.0 i" 0.0 tw_O 3/4" 5.1 94.9 ICL' 9.2 85.7 I/4' 128 77-9 30.,65 44 53 6607.6 1.10 IZ? 55.4 ' =20 12.3 42-6 R30 5.6 37.0 "30 6.0 31.0 80 19.4 11.6 4200 ys 4.4 0-40 PM 4.4 t 0.0 SAG A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Client: Hudson Can on Construction ATC Project No.: 970210 Date: September 13, 1997 Project: Castle Point Landfill Source: Karta Container Lab No.: 97-924 A.0 Item: Barrier Protection Date Sampled: 9111197 by: C. Devlin Date Tested:, 9113197 by: C. Devlin Atterberg Limits Test Method: ASTM D4318/AASHTO T89, T90 Results Lab No. 97-924A. 97-924B 97-924C Sec. Liquid Limit 32 32 32 Plastic Limit NIA NIA NIA Plasticity Index N.P. N.P. N.P. Non -Plastic Notes: Report Reviewed by: &LA &�Q Hud924ac 22M A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 September 15, 1997 Hudson Canyon Construction 115 Devries Avenue N. Tarrytown, NY 10591 AT -TN: Mitch Berkey H�4A PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill PROJECT NO.: 970210 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT ITEM: Barrier Protection SOURCE: Karta Container SAMPLED BY: C. Devlin TESTED BY: M. Creeden LAB NO.; 97-924A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 22.1% 2.3 A T .0 Advance Testing Complany, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 September 15, 1997 Hudson Canyon Construction 115 Devries Avenue N. Tarrytown, NY 10591 ATTN: Mitch Berkey PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill PROJECT NO.: 970210 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT ITEM: Barrier Protection SOURCE: Karta Container SAMPLED BY: C. Devlin TESTED BY: M. Creeden LAB NO.: 97-924B NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 21.8% 2011-4 A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 September 15, 1997 Hudson Canyon Construction 115 Devries Avenue N. Tarrytown, NY 10591 ATTN: Mitch Berkey PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill PROJECT NO.: 970210 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT ITEM: Barrier Protection SOURCE: Karta Container SAMPLED BY: C. Devlin TESTED BY: M. Creeden LAB NO.: 97-924C NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 23.3% 25 A. T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. 22 Sarah Wells Trail 0 Campbell Nall, NY 10916 0 (914) 496-1600 0 FAX 496.1398 CLIENT:.Sudson Canyon Construction ATCPROJECTNO.: 970210 PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NUMBER: 97-924A 16.7 85.8 SOIL IDNUMBER: - BP -1 23.6 92-4 TEST PERFORMED: MOISTURE-DENSr Y RELATIONSHIP'OF SOIL (PROCTOR TEST) 85.4 TEST METHOD: 'ASTM D698, Method B ITEM: Fill SOURCE: Karta Container DATE SAMPLED: September 10, 1997 SAMPLED BY: C. Devlin DATE TESTED: September 20, 1997 TESTED BY- J. Lynch RESULTS OFPROCWR MOISTURE-DFN=TEST visual Description: Recycled soil Test mw=um Dry Density: 92.9 Uco,R Test Optimum Moisture Content 22.2. Percent Oversize Particim- 10.0 rye Specific Gravity ofOversim: N/A Corrected Maximum Dry Duuity N /A gVcu Jt Corrected Opt- Moisture ConrenjSIA % 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 85 INDMDUAL TEST POINTS FERC EVl M!OMURE DRi WC= 16.7 85.8 19.8 91.3 23.6 92-4 28.2 85.4 '16 20 24 28 - MOISRJRE CONTENT, PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT Samples are prepamd by die "dry" madad and coa peeled +sem a masud rimer. Whey dee tooted of -oversize" paticies c=ec& 3%V, results are corrected per ASTM 134718. The specific gvwky of dre oversize may be delamiaed from test (see re x*Q firm exsatins ddi or maty be esfiwwhA n A T Advance Testing Company, Inc. C 22 Sarah Wells Trail 0 Campbell Hall, IVY 10916 0 (914) 49&1600 0 FAX 496-1398 CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction ATC PROJECTNO.: 970210 PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NUMBER 97-924B ss - SOIL ID NUMBER BP -2 TEST PERFORMED: MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATnONSHJP OF SOIL ( PROCTOR TEST ) TESTMEr;OD; ASTM D698, Method B ITEM Fill , SOURCE: Karta. Container DATE SAMPLED: September 10, 1997 SAMPLED BY: C. Devlin DATETESIED: September 20, 1997 'TESTED BY: J. Percoski RESULTS OFPRocwR MOISTURE -DEA l.TY TEST Visual Description Recycled soil Test Maximum Dry Density : 92.7 Ib/cuAR INDIVIDUAL TEST 91 Poffm -Mi -®RM Hamm Emma i6- =.-a PERCENT MOISTURE DRi'' DENSITY 11.7 88.9 15.9 92.6 20.5 90.5 21.6 89.0 { MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT Samples we prepared by the "dry" method rod compacted mirg a maul rammer. Wheat dw comett of"ovesnine" particles esceeds 5%. remitr are j corrected per ASTM D4718_ The specific vvv4 of the oversize may be determided Sem test ( sec repat,) fiom cmatmg dans, or my be ea0mmLs*d r A Advance Testis Company,Inc. .�. J - 22 Sarah Wells Trail 0 Campbell, Hall, NY 10916 0 (914) 496-1600 0 FAX 496-1398 CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction ATCPROJECrNO.: 970210 PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill i ATC LAB NUMBER: 97-9240 SOIL ID NLJMBER BP -3 TEST PERFORMED: MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATIONSHIP OF' SOIL (PROCTORTEST ) "IESTMETHOD: ASTM D698, Method B ITEM: Fill _ SOURCE: Karta Container DATE SAMPLED1 September 10, 1997 SAMPLED BY. C. Devlin DATETESIED: September 20., 1997 'IESTEDBY: J. Lynch RESULTS OF PROCTOR MOISTURE -DENSITY TEST VmW Desaiption: Recycled soil Test Maximum Dry Density : 9 2.9 lb/cu-ft Test Optamum Moisture Content 20.2 % Percent Oversize Particles: 20.0 % Spec ifie Gravity of Uuersize: N / A Corrected Maximum Dry Density. N/A Ib/cufL Corrected Opt. Moisture Content. N / A % 9 9 O INDIVIDUAL TEST Ow 9 1 POTM'S 9 PERCENT DRY U MOISTURE DEI&flT C4 w5.6 a �„ r : 1 89.3 18.2 91.9 8 O. a rN �: 23.2 91.2 8 I +:,.4 -, — -- _ - — 27.7 85.9 - cL 15 19 23 27 31 MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT Z� Samples are pepared by the "dry' method and compacted ruins a mswal ra®c When the content of"owaviad' particles esxetds 5%. rsmtts we eonvdad per ASTM Din& The specific g ky of dw oversize may, be determi sed Gam test (ue repo ) from castling daf or estimued /maybe \ F /?..w f 1 i Advance Testing Company, Inc. CLm;r HU&MCuryonconstruction 'PRoWT Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NO- 97-924A TEST PEMRUED, Dired Sheer Test of Soils UWff Consolidated Drained Conditions TEST METHOD: ASTM D3080, U ' BoW LGI 14 12-xIr Apparatus HEM Barrier Protection Fill - BP -I SOURCE_ Karta Container DATE SAMPLED: 9/10/97 SAMPLED BY: Casey Devlin DATE TESTED. I417-8/97 TESTED BY: Kevin Patton :. MM--, 200 0 0 0.2 { Shear Stress vs. Displacement I P,p N +2 psi N.I 0.4 0.5 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 OZ9 Horizontal Displacement, inches Reviewed by /- � re.n .?i1CM{ ♦a. iran�lMi Ju+.-sa . ci uwa s w a ova acvaaawa aiaa}+..�ca a.caw F 1200 0.15 a 1000 BOD r u 0.1 + 1 psi N 400 « 0.05 --+--- 2 psi N t 200 0 —� 4 psi N CO C 0 0 0 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 -0.05 Normal Stress, pst Hortz- DlgA- Inches :. MM--, 200 0 0 0.2 { Shear Stress vs. Displacement I P,p N +2 psi N.I 0.4 0.5 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 OZ9 Horizontal Displacement, inches Reviewed by /- � A Advance Testing Company, Inc. T PROJECT Castle Point Lmx= ATC LAB NO. 97-924B TEST PERFORMED: Dhcd .Shear Test of Soils Un&w Caosolidated Diamod Conditions TEST METHOD: ASTM D3080, U*g U'Bomrt4mgym LG -1 1412'X12" ruBc. Barrier Pmtedim Fill - BP -2 SOURCE: Kxta Container DATE SAMPLED: 9/10/97 SAMPLED BY: 1 Cney_DcvLin_ DATETESUD: 10/9.16/97 1 TESTED BY: I Kevin Patron ANGLE OF WrEF UL. FRICTM, o, DEGREES i 45.1f TANGENT o (phi) 1.001 1 0.15 0 u 0.1 C 0.05 L1. d 0 r fr .ff rf fr fr :ff Hortz Displ, Inches Shear Stress vs. Displacement t1 psi N — 2 psi N " 4 psi N E 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Horizontal Displacement Inches Peak at 0.75 irt. (l psi plot) possibly due to a rooL Reviewed by: m:7:= t1 psi N — 2 psi N " 4 psi N E 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Horizontal Displacement Inches Peak at 0.75 irt. (l psi plot) possibly due to a rooL Reviewed by: Advance Testing Company, Inc. CL= Hudson Canyon Conshuction PROJECT Castle Point Landfill . ATC LAB NO. 97-9240 TEST PERFORMED: Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions TEST METHOD: ASTM D3080, Using Boart- ear LG -11412"x12" ITEM: Barrier Protection Fi11- BP -3 SOURCE: Karta Container DATE SAMPLED: 9/10197 SAMPLED BY: Casey Devlin DATE TESTED: - 10/21/97 TESTED BY. Kevin Patton SUMMARY OF DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION, o, DEGREES 47.80 TANGENT o ( M) 1.103 COHESION C f 235 SUMMARY OF TEST DATA Reviewed by: TEST NUMBER; 1 2 3 NORMAL STRESS, psf 144 288 576 MAX. SHF AR STRESS, psf 387 563 867 HORIZ. DISPLACEMENT AT MAX. SHEAR 0.384 0.411 0.517 PERCENT MOISTURE, DTI IAL 22.69 22.69 22.69 PERCENT MOISTURE, FINAL 22.47 22.53 22.40 DRY DENSITY, PCF, INITIAL. 83.61 83.61 83.61 DRY DENSITY, PCF, AT TEST 84.77 85.15 85.86 THICKNESS, INCHES, WMAL 3.688 3.688 3.688 THICKNESS, INCHES, AT TEST 1 3.637 . 3.621 3.591 DISPLACEMENT RATE. in/min 0.01 0.01 0.01 Peak Shear vs, Normal Stress Vertical vs. Horizontal Displacement 1000 0.12- a 800 aai 0.1 600 O.OB 1 PMN iB 400 0.06 � 2 psi N 200 0.04 —+t— 4 psi N vi 0 0.02 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 -0.02 Normal Stress, psf Horiz. Oispl., Inches Shear Stress vs. Displacement 1000 900 800 700 a 600 600 400 s '300 2M 100 O 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Horizontal Displacement, arches Reviewed by: SECTION 3: TOPSOIL: PRECONSTRUCTION QUALIFICIATION (SOURCE - KARTA CONTAINER) NOTE: THE MATERIAL FROM KARTA CONTAINER WAS NOT USED. INSTEAD THE TOPSOIL LAYER WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH MATERIAL FROM SOUTHERN DUTCHESS SAND & GRAVEL. THIS PRE -QUALIFICATION IS SUPERCEDED BY SECTION 9 HEREIN. SOURCE: KARTA CONTAINER TOPSOIL LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA I FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. PARTICLE SIZE #1 D422 SEE LIMITS SEE SHEET 32 PASS NIA PARTICLE SIZE #2 D422 SEE LIMITS SEE SHEET 33 * N/A PARTICLE SIZE #3 D422 SEE LIMITS SEE SHEET 34 NIA PARTICLE SIZE #4 D422 SEE LIMITS SEE SHEET 35 N/A PARTICLE SIZE #5 D422 SEE LIMITS SEE SHEET 36 * N/A pH #1 D4972 5.5 - 7.6 7.8 37 * NIA pH #2 D4972 5.5 -7.6 7.6 38 PASS NIA pH #3 D4972 5.5 -7.6 8.0 39 * * NIA pH #4 D4972 5.5-7.6 7.8 40 * * NIA ORGANIC CONTENT #1 D2974 2-20% 7.1 % 37 PASS NIA ORGANIC CONTENT #2 D2974 2-20% 14.1 % 38 PASS NIA ORGANIC CONTENT #3 D2974 2-20% 8.1 % 39 PASS NIA ORGANIC CONTENT #4 D2974 2-20% 6.6% 40 PASS NIA USGS CLASSIFICATION D2487 N/A SM 41 PASS N/A SOIL DESCRIPTION D2488 NIA SEE SHEET 41 PASS NIA `SLIGHTLY LESS THAN SPECIFIED PASSED THE #200 SIEVE, HOWEVER, THIS ITEM IS STILL DEEMED ACCEPTABLE. `*SLIGHTLY ACIDIC ON THE pH SCALE. THIS ITEM IS SUPERCEEDED BY CERTIFICATION FROM A SOIL AGRONOMIST THAT MATERIAL IS CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VEGATATIVE GROWTH, NOTE: THE MATERIAL FROM KARTA CONTAINER WAS NOT USED. INSTEAD THE TOPSOIL LAYER WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH MATERIAL FROM SOUTHERN DUTCHESS SAND & GRAVEL. THIS PRE -QUALIFICATION IS SUPERCEDED BYSECTION 9 HEREIN. - 3A- rI T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Gradation Analysis CIient Hudson Canyon Construction ATC Lab # i 97-925 Project Castle Point Landfill Project # 970210 Source Karta Container Sumple Date 9/10197 Sample Type Topsoil By C. Devlin Sample Location Stockpile Tested Date 9/11197 Specification I 5.01.2-2.01A By J. Lynch Comments: Code: Lab No. 97-925 Sieve %Ret % Pass Spec. 3" 0.0 100,0 2" 0.0 100.0 100.0 1.5" 0.0 100.0 1" 0.0 100.0 85-100 3/4" 0.0 100.0 1/2" 1.6 98.4 1/4" 8.6 89.8 65-100 #4 4.0 85.8 #10 14.0 71.8 920 13.3 58.5 430 5.9 52.6 #40 6.5 46.1 #$0 159 30.2 #200 8.8 21.4 20-80 Pan 21.4 0.0 Minus #200 By Wash SAG 32- T C Advai.ce Tasting Company, Ing..-. ® 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Gradation Analysis Client Global Recycling Co. ATC Lab # 97-1257 Project Quality Control Project # 974038 Saltrce Global Recycling; Sample Date 12/10/97 Sumple Tppe - Topsoil !w Client suntple Location Sampled by client Tested Date 12/11/97 Specification NIA 6v t M. Foster Comments Code: . m Lab No. 97-1257 Sieve %Ret % Pass Spec. 3" 0.0 100.0 2" 0.0 100.0 tC7,D 1.5" 0.0 100.0 1'- 0.0 100.0 S-5---(00 314" 0.0 100.0 1/2" 1.8 98.2 1/4" 10.5 87.6 Gam-- l 44 4.7 82.9 910 12.6 70.3 920 13.5 56.8 930 6.6 50.2 940 7.0 43.2 #80 16.3 26.9 4200 10.9 16.0 - 80 Pan 16.0 0.0 Minus #200 By Wash SAG 33 Advance Testing Company, Inc. c22 Sarah Wells Trail -Campbell Hall, IVY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Gradation Analysis Client Global Recycling Co. ATCLab # 97-1258 project Quality Control Project # 974038 Source Global Recycling I Sample Date 12/10/97 Sample Type Fill By Client Sample Location Sampled by.ciient Tested Date 12/11/97 Specification IIIA By M. Foster Comments: Code: Lab No. 97-1.258 Sieve %Ret % Pass Spec. 3" 0.0 100.0 2" 0.0 100.0 100.0 1.5" 0.0 100.0 1" 0.0 100,0 br-ioo 314" 1.0 99.0 112" 2.3 96.7 114" 15.2 81.5 G5 --k0`1 44 7.1 74.4 410 11.8 62.6 #20 10.2 52.4 930 5.0 47.4 #40 5.7 41.7 480 13.8 27.9 #200 10.0 17.9 Zd--�' Pan 17.9 0.0 Minus #200 By Wash SAG 34 A T C Advance Testing Company, inc, Y 22 Sarah Wells "frail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 - (914),496-1600 Gradation Analysis Client I Hudson Canyon Construction ATC Lab # 97-770A Project.E Castle Point Landfill Praleet # 970210 $allnel Sample Tvpr Kart; Scremcd till Sample Date ¢y 811419'7 Client .Sample Loealion Speercation Stockpile 4.01.2-2.01A Tested Date By 8115197 E. Witkowski Comments, Code: w.rmk Lab No. 97-770A Sieve %Rot °1o.Pass Spec. 4" 0.0 100.0 100.0 2" 0.0 100.0 1.5" 0.0 . 100.0 1" 0.0 100.0 3/4" 0.0 100.0 IR" 0.0 98.1 1/4" 1.9 76.0 94 12.9 63.1 #10 23.4 39.7 #20 14.0 25.7 #30 4.7 21.0 #40 4.2 16.8 0-70 480 6,7 10.1 4200 1 2.9 7.2 1 Pan 7.2 0.0 Minus ff200 By Wash SAG. 3S Ica :2 22 Sarah Wells Trail Campbeii Hall, N-,' 10916 • (914) 496-1600 C Gradation Analysis Client Hudsot, Canyon Construction r1 TC Lab it 97-770B ,Project CoscicPoint Landfill Projeelit 91`0210 Sou rice Knrm Sa,npleDale `/1,4/97 Sample Type Topsoil By —I Client Sample Location SpeciJlcation Stockpile 5.01.2-2.0IA Tested Dale By "1'15/97 _ �. !}'i kawski Comments: Code: I-n7m Lab No_ 97--770B Sicvc °/.Rct %,Pass I5p=4, 3" 0.0 100.4 2" 0.0 1x0,0 Wo 0.0 100.0 1" 0.0 100.0 3s -i 40 3!a" 0.0 100.0 112" 1 0,7 99. 114" f 9.4 89.9 5}-i00 14 8.2 81.7 "ld 22.0 59.7 1120 21.1 38.6 030 7-9 30.7 Ip a O 6.5 24.2 G8o 11.0 13.E #200 5.6 7.6 20 ?an 7.6 0.0 Minus 11200 By Wash SAG 3� 0 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Client: Hudson Can on Construction Project Name: Castle Point Landfill Date: September 12, 1997 Project No.: 970210 Source: Karta Container Lab No.: 97-925 Item: Topsoil Date Sampled: 9110197 : C. Deviin Date Tested: __+B 9112197 By: C. Devlin Summary of results Lab No. 97-925 Sec. PH 7.9 5.5-7.6 % or anic 7.1 2-20% "011 3'l A Advance Testing Company, Inc. T C 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 i Client: Global Recycling Inc. Project Name: Quality Control Date: December 11, 1997 Project No.: 974038 Source: Global Recycling Lab No.: 97-1257 Item: Topsoil Date Sampled: 12/10/97 BY: Client Date Tested: 12/11/97 By: C. Devlin Summary of results Lab No. 97-1257 Sec. PH 7.6 5.S—"�•� % O anis 14.1 — Zo'o <& MT 0 A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. 4 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 * (914) 496-1600 Client: Global Recycling Inc. Project Name: QualitX Control Date: December 11, 1997 P.ro'ect No.: 974038 Sources Global Recycling Lab No.: 97-1258 Ilcm: bill Date Sarn led: 12/10/97 it Client Date Tested: 12/11/97 By: C. Devlin Summary of results Lal) No. 97-1258 Spec. rD 8.0 5,5 —1•� % organic 8.1 z �UzM 39 Hw$"Q3 12 22 Sarah'vVells Trail - Campbe Hall, NY 109,16 • (914) 496-1600 son Canvon Construction 1 970210 Augw Castle Point Uncifil Ktirta Covauiner 97-77013 T 'llSt14/97 Client S �'I S/14/97 R. Eamil Sunmnwy ofpH'and Orgw.ic Cw'z, tent Rc5ults 97-770B 7,9 5.5-7.6 6-6 2-20% 01,'21,'98 11:23 %T914 498 1393 ADVANCE TESTING f�j 01)3 A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wel[s Trail • Campbell Hal[, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Castle Point Landfill Closure Prmiaalfficnron Tests January 2L 1993 Page Z C-5. So9 Yn—=d c A=[vms — Tamil Laver Soil tt =C= =frets was pccrformed by the second of the rwoaltematn a methods.. i.e. Orgy Com ASTM D2974 A ASTM D4972 Dwc ipdon, ASTM D24U USCS Cl U ficatior , ASTM D2487 OrMMC aad gFT.resc results and a gradation =Ilyw wt= prMously provided forthis material (Lab No. 97-925-) The motion of the soil is as, fbHows Sand WUh some Still Md 19de gravel, wrath organics; daskv (dark) brown. Fouaceu p== gmrj, CODS M9 Ofu2b=d -dam., brokm Stoney crushed and bride wood chi} 641/16 sand contamiag SMW orgm= MatenaL 2 I% alt with Some ffix organic =Zearml- Low dry strength and slaw ddat=v. Slsgbtplastichy. The USCS CLmsifxcation of the soil is: SM, S&y sand whit org=c angm Please c== Chris Brower or me if you. omd airy additiortai iafomaolion. Yoms truly, Kam L Pattoa, Pte. 4 1 SECTION 4: CLAY BARRIER LAYER - ONSITE "TEST PAD" RESULTS CLAY BARRIER LAYER: "TEST PAD" RESULTS ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA 1 FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. PARTICLE SIZE #1 C136 100% < 1- 99'5%<1" 42 NIA PARTICLE SIZE #2 C136 100% < 11. 100%`1" 100%<l' 42 PASS NIA 42 PASS NIA PARTICLE SIZE #3 C136 100% < 1" ATTERBERG LIMITS #1 D4318 PLASTIC P1=3.6 43 PASS NIA ATTERBERG LIMITS #2 D4318 PLASTIC PI = 2.7 43 PASS NIA ATTERBERG LIMITS #3 D4318 PLASTIC PI = 4.5 43 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 1 D2216 NIA 22.9°x6 44 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 2 DD216 NIA 20.1% 44 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 3 D2216 NIA 19.2% 44 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 4 D2216 NIA 18.9% 1 45 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 5 D2216 NIA 19.4% 45 PASS NIA NATURAL MOSITURE CONTENT 6 D2216 NIA 18.6% 45 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 7 D2216 NIA 13.8%** 46 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENTS D2216 NIA 14.0%** 46 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 9 D2216 NIA 13.5%** 46 PASS NIA MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 113.6 LB/CF 47 PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE #1 @ 12.4.% NIA MXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 113.9 LB/CF 48 PASS OPTIMUM MOISTURE #2 @ 14.5% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 114.1 LB/CF 49 PASS N/A OPTIMUM MOISTURE #3 @14.5% -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #1 D5084 1.0 x 10 cm/sec 1.ox10 50 PASS P1 cm/sec 5 -7 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #2 D5084 1.0 x 10 cm/sec 9.3 x 10 51 PASS P2 cm/sec TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #3 D5084 5 1 0 x 10 cm/sec 1.4 x 10 52 PASS P3 cm/sec INSITU COMPACTION & WATER D2922 >90%,12-16± 100+%, 53 PASS Cl CONTENT #1 D3017 17.3*** INSITU COMPACTION & WATER D2922 >90%,12-16t 100+%,i 7 1 * * * 53 PASS C2 CONTENT #2 D3017 INSITU COMPACTION & WATER D2922 >90%,12-16± 100+%, 53 PASS C3 CONTENT #3 D3017 17.1*** INSITU COMPACTION & WATER D2922 >90%,12-16t 98.1+%, 53 PASS C4 CONTENT #4 D3017 19.1 NOTES. * A VERY SMALL PERCENT (0.5%) DID NOT PASS 1.0-, BUT DID PASS 1.5". THIS SLIGHT DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATIONS IS DEEMED ACCEPTABLE, . ** MOISTURE CONTENTS AFTER CLAY WAS SPREAgAND ALLOWFQ TO SUN DRY * * * MOISTURE CONTENTS SLIGHTLY HIGH AT TIME 01; TEST. -4A- A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 li Report of Sieve Analysis of Fine/Coarse Aggregates it Client: Hudson Can on Project: Castle Point Landfill Source: South Dutchess S & G ATC Project #: 970210 Sam led: 4129198 Sampled By- P. Gurciello Tested: 511198 Tested Bv. R. Parton ATC Lab # Sample Type Sampling Location Specification 98-0195A clan barrier truck Project Spec. Item 3.01.2 98-0195B clay barrier truck Prosect Spec, Item 3.01.2 98-01950 clay barrier truck Proiect Spec. Item 3.01.2 Lab No. 98-0195A Lab No. 98-0195B Sieve %Ret % Pass 5" 0.0 100.0 3" 0.0 100.0 2" 0.0 100.0 1.5" 0.0 100.0 1" 0.5 99.5 3/4" 0.0 99.5 1/2" 0.5 99.0 114" 2.1 96.9 #4 0.3 96.6 #10 1.1 95.5 #20 2.1 93.4 #30 2.1 91.3 #40 2.6 88.7 #80 6.4 82.3 #200 6.1 76.2 Pan 76.2 0.0 %Ret % Pass 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.9 99.1 1.8 97.3 0.2 97.2 1.0 96.1 2.5 93.6 2.4 91.2 3.3 87.9 8.4 79.5 7.4 72.1 72.1 0.0 Lab No. QR-ni ocr %Ret % Pass 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.5 99.5 0.8 98.7 0.8 98.0 0.1 97.9 0.7 97.2 1.9 95.3 2.0 93.3 2.8 90.5 6.6 83.9 6.3 77.6 77.6 -L. 0 Comments: Minus #200 by wash. Sample #98-0195A fails to meet specifications. Samples #98-019518,C comply with specifications. Report Reviewed BX: A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Report of Atterberg_Limits Test Results Test Method: ASTM D4318, AASHTO T89, T90 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barrier Project #: 970210 Source: S. Dutchess Sand & Gravel Specification, 3:41.2 Sampled: 4129198 Sampled By: P. Gurciulio Tested: 5/4/98 Tested By: R. Morrison Lab Number: 98-0195A 98-01958 98-0195C Liquid Limit: 24.7 23.5 24.9 Plastic Limit: 21.1 20.8 20.4 Plasticity Index: 3.6 2.7 4.5 Notes: Specification: Section 3.01.2, "plasticity is desirable". All samples, 98-0195A, 98- 0195B, and 98-0195C compllies with specifications. -Report Reviewed B : (of_ 43 C Advance Testing Company, .Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Report of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 - 92 Client: Hudson Canyon Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barrier Project M. 970210 Source: South Dutchess S & G ATC Lab #: 98-0194 Date Sampled. 4129198 Sampled By: P. Gurciello Date Tested: 4130198 ITested 8 R. Morrison ATC Lab No.: 98-0194A 98-0194B 98-0194C Wet Weight 287.3 287.3 299.3 Dry Weight 233.8 239.3 251.1 % Nat. Moisture: 22.9 20.1 19.2 Report Reviewed By: V A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 - 92 Client: Hudson Canyon Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barrier Project #: 970210 Source: South Dutchess S & G ATC Lab #: 98-0195 Date Sampled: 4129198 Sampled By: P. Gurciello Date Tested: 4130198 Tested B . R. Morrison ATC Lab No.; 98-0195A 98-0195B 98-0195C Wet Weight 302.2 324.7 347.0 Dry Weight 254.1 271.9 292.5 % Nat. Moisture: 18.9 19.4 18.6 Report Reviewed B FROM : HCC PHONE NO. : 914762B863 May, 26 199B 01:02PM P2 Va, 6V1 41V 11. V1 r!id 0144mb1:1b_ ADVANCE r-STtNG 0002 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Camph*t Hall, NY 10918 • (914) 496-1600 ATC Lab No.: 95.253A 98.2638 W253C Wet WOMIlt 2516.6 2614.7 2553.7 Da Weight : 2210.4 25W-2- 2266.0 °!e Nat Moisbt re: 13.8 14.0 13.5 Report Reviewed B 00, q �cw�p To Q2`'I - IN FI�L� 4(a A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 REPORT OF MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP CLIENT: Hudson Canyon ATC PROJECT NO.: 970210 PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NUMBER: 98-0195A TEST METHOD: ASTM 698 'Standard' Method: C SOIL ID NUMBER: 1 16.8 ITEM; Clay barrier 108.2 SOURCE: South Dutchess S-& G % SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown silt clay. DATE SAMPLED: 4/29198 1 1 SAMPLED BY: P. Gurciello DATE TESTED: 1 512198 1 ITESTED BY: R. Morrison 5/4198 Test Maximum Dry Density: 113.6 Individual Test Points Percent Moisture Dry Density 9.1 112.1 10.6 113.4 14.0 113.5 16.8 112.0 19.3 108.2 20.8 106.2 5/4198 Test Maximum Dry Density: 113.6 Ib/cu. t. Test Optimum Moisture Content: 12.4 % Percent Oversize Particles: 0.5 % Specific Gravity of Oversize: NA Corrected Maximum Dry Density N/A Ib/cu. ft. Corrected Opt. Moisture Content. NIA % Report Reviewed by: do A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY. 10916 • (914) 496-1600 11 REPORT OF MOISTURE TENSITY RELATIONSHIP CLIENT: Hudson Canyon ATC PROJECT NO.: 970210 PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NUMBER: 98-0195C TEST METHOD: ASTM 698 'Standard' Method: C SOIL ID NUMBER: 3 ITEM: Clay barrier lb/cu. ft. SOURCE: South Dutchess S,8 G % SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown silt clay. DATE SAMPLED: 4129198 j ISAMPLED BY: P. Gurciello DATE TESTED: 512198 1 ITESTED BY: C. Ferrante 115.0 i ERE, °0 113.0 LL 112.0 U a 111.0 c 110,0 3 a a, 109.0 a 108.0 a n 107.0 Moisture Density Relationship 514198 C� Zero Air Voids Test Maximum Dry Density: 114.1 Iblcu. ft. Test Optimum Moisture Content: 14.5 % Percent Oversize Particles: 0.5 % Specific Gravity of Oversize: NA Corrected Maximum Dry Density N/A lb/cu. ft. Corrected Opt. Moisture Content. NIA % Report Reviewed by: a - T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Report of Triaxial Pearmleability Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM D5084 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Source: S. Dutchess Sand & Gravel Lab #: 98-0199A Item: Clay Barrier ATC Project #: 970210 Date Sampled: 4130198 Date Tested: 4/30198 Sam led By: I P. Gurciullo Tested B M. Creeden Sam ie Information Field Number: #1 Received Sample Length in.: 12.1 Specimen Pre ared From Section:. 6.7 to 12.0 inches Below Top of Sample Description: Light brown fine sand with traces clay, little ravel Test Sam le Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 13.45 13.46 Diameter, cm: 7.15 7,15 Moisture Content, %: 13.61 16.00 Dry Density, PCF: 115.39 115.30 Pe.rmeabili Test Conditions Type of Water Used: TaR Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI: 67,9 Hydraulic Gradient: 5.3 Effective Stress, PSI minimax): 2.8116.33 Initial Degree of Saturation, %: 83.1 Final Degree of Saturation, %: 97.5 ' Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 200C (68°F): k2o = 1.0 x 10'6 cm/sec Specification: k20 = 1.0 x 10-5 cm/sec or less Notes: Sample complies with specification. Report Reviewed B ( r -- RAP �� -JA, P, ioliTLA F-iei D COKPACTiON A. C.Z A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Report of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM D5084 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Pro'ect: Castle Point Landfill Source: S. Dutchess Sand & Gravel Lab M 98-0199B Item: Clay Barrier ATC Project M 970210 Date Sampled: 4130198 Date Tested: 4/30198 Sam led B P. Gurciulio Tested Br, Im. Creeden Notes: Sam le Information Field Number: #2 Received Sample Len th in.: 13.8 Specimen Prepared From Section: 4.7 to 10.2 inches Below Top of Sample Description: Light brown fine sand with traces clay, little ravel Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 13.69 13.18 Diameter, cm: 7.08 7.20 Moisture Content, %: 18.08 17.09 Dry Densi , PCF: 111.94 112.39 Permeabill Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI; 68.6 Hydraulic Gradient: 18.2 Effective Stress, PSI (min/max): 2.616,3 Initial Degree of Saturation, %: 100.2 Final Degree of Saturation, %: 95.9 " Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 20°C (68(F): k20 = 9.3 x 10"' cm/sec Specification: k2b = 1.0 x 10-5 cm/sec or less Sample complies with specification. Report Reviewed BY: 4, Z� WAP Q l.k.6 ITS C APIC.TOJ a C_ i 51 A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 Report of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM D5084 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Source: S. Dutchess Sand & Gravel Lab #: 98-0199C Item: Clay Barrier ATC Project #: 970210 Date Sampled: 4130198 Date'Tested: 511198 Sam led B P. Gurciullo Tested,B M. Creeden Notes Sam le Information Field Number: #3 Received Sample Length in.: 11.074 Specimen Prepared From Section: 3.2 to 8.7 inches Below Top of Sample Description: Light brown fine sand with traces clay, little ravel Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 11.80 11.42 Diameter, cm: 7.12 7.23 Moisture Content, %: 13.16 14.81 Dry Density, PCF: 117.80 118.04 Permeabili Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI: 68.8 Hydraulic Gradient: 17.0 Effective Stress, PSI (min/max): 3.3616.30 Initial Degree of Saturation, %: 86.2 Final Degree of Saturation, %: 97.7 " Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 200C (680F): k20 = 1.4 x 10-6 cm/sec Specification: k20 = 1.0 x 10-5 cm/sec or less Sample complies with specification. Report Reviewed By'. t'lYl. . 03 IPS%T" FiQL[D CpMP1%-T§OW Ca -kCA 52. A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 # (914) 496-1600 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: Castle Point Landfiii TEST EQUIP: Gauge #3 DATE. 04130/98 WEATHER: Sunny, Hot, Humid REPORT: 97-0210- 1 Technician P. Gurciullo ' Test Soil Max Water In Place Compact Code No Date Depth I Elev No pry pen Cont Dry Den. (9:) Test Location I�Ey 1 4130 12" -18' above SG CL 108.0 17.3 110.1 100 + 6A 'Midway between 1144 & 1143 10' from line C-1 - PZ 2 4130 12" -18' above SG CL 108.0 17.1 109.9 100 + 6A "Midway between 1143 & 1142 10' from 50' line GZ , 171 3 4130 12" -18' above SG CL 108.0 17:1 . 110.6 100 + 6A,. 'Midway between 1142 & 1141 10' from 50' line G3 -- 4 4/30 12" -18' above SG CL 108.0 19.1 105.8 98.1 6A 'Midway between 1141 & 1144 10' from 50' line Legend Test Pad 50x50' IMPORTANT NOTES Three sheiby tube samples were obtained for laboratory analysis to determine insite permeability Representatives of Hudson Canyon Construction were present and aware of test results. LEGEND All densities reported as pounds per cubic foot Compaction % is based on maximum dry density o6ta;r{ in sample indicated by soil ID number Respectfully submitted ADVANCE TESTING Co. n "CODES 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) Test Results Comply 3) BASE COURSE 6) Recompecdon Required 4) SUBBASE C) After Recompaction 5) SOIL CEMENT 6) SECTION 5: INSITUCLAY BARRIER LAYER CLAY BARRIER LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA I FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. PARTICLE SIZE #1 C136 100% < 1" 100%<l" 54 PASS N/A PARTICLE SIZE #2 C136 100% < 1" 100%<1" 55 PASS NIA PARTICLE SIZE #3 C136 100% < 1" 100%<1" 56 PASS N/A PARTICLE SIZE #4 C136 100% < 1 " 100%<l' 57 PASS NIA PARTICLE SIZE #5 C136 100% < 1" 100%<1" 5$ PASS N/A PARTICLE SIZE #6 C136 100% < 1" 100%[1" 59 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #1 D4318 PLASTICITY PI =1 .4 60 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #2 D4318 DESIRABLE N/A 61 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #3 D4318 N/A 62 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #4 D4318 NIA 62 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #5 D4318 PI =4.4 63 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #6 D4318 N/A 64 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #7 D4318 N/A 65 PASS NIA ATTERBERG LIMITS #8 04318 N/A 66 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #9 D4318 PI = 3.6 67 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 1 D2216 12 - 16 ± " 13.8% 68 PASS' NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 2 DD216 12 - 16 ± " 14.0% 68 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 3 D2216 12 - 16 ± r 13.5% 68 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 4 D2216 12 - 16± ' 19.4% 69 • • NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 5 D2216 12 - 16 ± • 16.4% 70 PASS NIA NATURAL MOSITURE CONTENT 6 D2216 12 - 16 ± " 14.8% 71 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 7 D2215 12 - 16± ' 14.3% 72 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 8 D2216 12 - 16 ± " 17.7% 72 • NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 9 D2216 12 - 16 ± r 19.1% 73 "" NIA NATURAL MOISUTRE CONTENT 10 D2216 12 - 16± ' 21.7% 74 `" NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 11 D2216 12 - 16± ' 12.7% 75 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 12 D2216 12 - 16t " 14.6% 76 PASS NIA NATURAL MOSITURE CONTENT 13 D2216 12 - 16 ± ' 13.2% 77 PASS N/A NATURAL MOSITURE CONTENT 14 D2216 12 - 16 ± ` 16.8% 78 " NIA ■rrrr■ "THE AVERAGE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT FOR THE SIX PROCTOR TESTS PERFORMED ON THE CLAY BARRIER (INCLUDING TEST PAD) IS 14.3% *THESE NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENTS WERE SLIGHTLY HIGH AT THE TIME OF TESTING. SUBSEQUENT INSITU TESTING AFTER THE MATERIAL WAS SPREAD OUT INDICATED ACCEPTABLE RESULTS. - 5A - CLAY BARRIER LAYER TEST TYPE ASTM METHOD ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA TEST RESULTS PASS MAP 1 FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16t 97.8%, 79 PASS C5 CONTENT #1 D3017 14.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16:t 95.3%, 79 FAIL C6 CONTENT #2 (RETEST @ #38) D3017 17.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 96.0%, 79 PASS C7 CONTENT #3 D3017 16.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 95.1%, 79 PASS C8 CONTENT #4 D3017 16.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 t 98.4%. 79 PASS C9 CONTENT #5 D3017 14.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 95.8%, 79 PASS C10 CONTENT #6 D3017 16.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 95.6%, 79 PASS C11 CONTENT #7 D3017 13.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 ± 92.4%, 79 PASS C12 CONTENT #8 D3017 14.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 95.4%, 79 PASS C13 CONTENT #9 D3017 16.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± .96.1%, 80 PASS C14 CONTENT #10 D3017 14.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 93.5%, 80 PASS C15 CONTENT #11 D3017 13.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 ± 99.8%, 80 PASS C16 CONTENT #12 D3017 12.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.0%, 80 PASS C17 CONTENT #13 D3017 12.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 92.4%, 80 PASS C18 CONTENT #14 D3017 16.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 99.3%, 80 PASS C19 CONTENT #15 -D3017 14.4 INSITU COMPACTION &MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 99.8%, 81 PASS C20 CONTENT #16 D3017 13.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.2%, 81 PASS C21 CONTENT #17 D3017 15.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 98.6%, 81 PASS C22 CONTENT #18 D3017 14.8 - 5B- CLAY BARRIER LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA 1 FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 97.3%, 81 PASS C23 CONTENT #19 D3017 16.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 94.1%, 81 FAIL C24 CONTENT #20 (RETEST @ #37) D3017 17:2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 96.6%, 81 PASS C25 CONTENT #21 D3017 15.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 94.7%, 81 PASS C26 CONTENT #22 D3017 14.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.3%. 81 PASS C27 CONTENT #23 D3017 12.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 t 93.9%, 81 PASS C28 CONTENT #24 D3017 13.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 91.9%, 81 PASS C29 CONTENT #25 D3017 14.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.5%, 81 PASS C30 CONTENT #26 D3017 15.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 95.8%, 81 PASS C31 CONTENT #27 D3017 16.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.3%, 81 PASS C32 CONTENT #28 D3017 16.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 t 94.6%, 81 FAIL C33 CONTENT #29 {RETEST @ #33) D3017 18.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 100+%, 82 PASS C34 CONTENT #30 D3017 12.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 96.8%, 82 PASS C35 CONTENT #31 D3017 12.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 96.9%, 82 PASS C36 CONTENT #32 D3017 14.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE 02922 90%, 12-16± 95.9%, 82 PASS C37 CONTENT #33 (RETEST OF #29) D3017 14.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 99.7%, 82 PASS C38 CONTENT #34 D3017 12.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.9%, 82 PASS C39 CONTENT #35 D3017 12.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 93.7%, 82 PASS C40 CONTENT #36 D3017 14.0 - 5c- CLAY BARRIER LAYER TEST TYPE ASTM METHOD ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS CRITERIA RESULT PAGE NO. PASS 1 FAIL MAP KEY # INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 97.7%, 82 PASS C41 CONTENT #37 IRETEST OF #20) D3017 13.6 INSITU COMPACTION& MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 98.5%, 82 PASS C42 CONTENT #38 (RETEST OF #2) D3017 12.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 94.7%, 82 PASS C43 CONTENT #39 D3017 13.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 90.2%, 83 PASS C44 CONTENT #40 D3017 15.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 ± 96.7%. 83 PASS C45 CONTENT #41 D3017 14.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 ± 96.00/6, 83 PASS C46 CONTENT #42 D3017 14.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98..5%, 83 PASS C47 CONTENT #43 D3017 13.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.0%, 83 PASS C48 CONTENT #44 D3017 13.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 92.0%, 83 PASS C49 CONTENT #45 D3017 14.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 ± 94.5%, 83 PASS C50 CONTENT #46 D3017 13.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 94.8%, 83 PASS C51 CONTENT #47 D3017 14.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 92.3%, 83 PASS C52 CONTENT #48 D3017 15.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 97.0%, 84 PASS C53 CONTENT #49 D3017 14.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.8%, 84 PASS C54 CONTENT #50 D3017 13.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 97.3%, 84 PASS C55 CONTENT #51 D3017 14.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.3%, 84 PASS C56 CONTENT #52 D3017 15.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 91.0%, 84 PASS C57 CONTENT #53 D3017 14.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 96.2%, 84 PASS C58 CONTENT #54 D3017 14.8 - 5D- -5E- CLAY BARRIER LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA 1 FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 92.1%, 84 PASS C59 CONTENT #55 D3017 14.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 95.1%, 84 PASS C60 CONTENT #56 D3017 13.1 INSITU COMPACTION &MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 95.8%, 85 PASS C61 CONTENT #57 D3017 11.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 91.4%, 85 PASS C62 CONTENT #58 D3017 14.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16:t 92.9%. 85 PASS C63 CONTENT #59 D3017 13.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 92.7%, 85 PASS C64 CONTENT #60 D3017 13.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 93.4%, 85 PASS C65 CONTENT #61 D3017 14.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 96.7%, 85 PASS C66 CONTENT #62 D3017 14.1 INSITU COMPACTION &_ MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16:L 94.9%, 85 PASS C67 CONTENT #63 D3017 14.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 t 93.2%, 85 PASS C68 CONTENT #64 D3017 13.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 94.7%, 85 PASS C69 CONTENT #65 D3017 12.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.5%, 85 PASS C70 CONTENT #66 D3017 14.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98..3%, 85 PASS C71 CONTENT #67 D3017 14.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 95.3%, 85 PASS C72 CONTENT #68 D3017 14.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.9%, 85 PASS C73 CONTENT #69 D3017 13.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 95.6%, 85 PASS C74 CONTENT #70 D3017 14.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 99.8%, 86 PASS C75 CONTENT #71 D3017 13.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16t 100+%, 86 PASS C76 CONTENT #72 D3017 11.9 -5E- CLAY BARRIER LAYER TEST TYPE ASTM METHOD ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA TEST RESULTS PASS 1 FAIL MAP KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 98.6%, 86 PASS C77 CONTENT #73 D3017 11.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 100+%, 86 PASS C78 CONTENT #74 D3017 14.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 96.8%, 86 PASS C79 CONTENT #75 D3017 16.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 99.1%, 86 PASS C80 CONTENT #76 D3017 13.6 INSITU COMPACTION &MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 100+%. 86 PASS C81 CONTENT #77 D3017 14.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 100+%, 86 PASS C82 CONTENT #78 D3017 12.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16 100+%, 86 PASS C83 CONTENT #79 D3017 13.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE 02922 90%, 12-16± 97.2%, 86 PASS C84 CONTENT #80 D3017 12.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 100+%, 87 PASS C85 CONTENT #81 D3017 13.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 t 99.5%, 87 PASS C86 CONTENT #82 D3017 14.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.3%, 87 PASS C87 CONTENT #83 D3017 15.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16t 97.2%, 87 PASS C88 CONTENT #84 D3017 15.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16t 100+%, 87 PASS C89 CONTENT #85 D3017 14.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 95.6%, 87 PASS C90 CONTENT #86 D3017 13.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 95.2%, 87 PASS C91 CONTENT #87 D3017 15.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.8%, 87 PASS C92 CONTENT #88 D3017 14.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 96.6%, 87 PASS C93 CONTENT #89 D3017 15.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16t 99.7%, 87 PASS C94 CONTENT #90 D3017 14.7 - 5F - CLAY BARRIER LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA /FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 98.8%, 87 PASS C95 CONTENT #91 D3017 14.7 INSITU COMPACTION: & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 100+%, 87 PASS C96 CONTENT #92 D3017 13.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16:t 97.0%, 87 PASS C97 CONTENT #93 D3017 12.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 100+%, 88 PASS C98 CONTENT #94 D3017 12.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.5%. 88 PASS C99 CONTENT #95 D3017 12.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 ± 100+%, 88 PASS C100 CONTENT #96 D3017 12.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 100+%, 88 PASS 0101 CONTENT #97 D3017 12.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.2%, 88 PASS C102 CONTENT #98 D3017 13.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.2%, 88 PASS C103 CONTENT #99 D3017 12.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12-16± 100+%, 88 PASS C104 CONTENT #100 D3017 13.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.2%, 88 PASS C105 CONTENT #101 D3017 12.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.4%, 88 PASS C106 CONTENT #102 D3017 12.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 96.8%, 88 PASS C107 CONTENT #103 D3017 12.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 97.6%, 88 PASS 0108 CONTENT #104 D3017 13.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16 ± 100+%, 88 PASS C109 CONTENT #105 D3017 12.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 98.3%, 88 PASS C110 CONTENT #106 D3017 12.6 INSITU COMPACTION & �OISTURE D2922 90%, 12-16± 100%, 88 PASS C111 CONTENT #107 D3017 13.7 - 5G - CLAY BARRIER LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA 1 FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12 -16± 98.0%, 88 PASS C112 CONTENT #108 D3017 15.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12 - 16± 99.1%, 88 PASS Cl 13 CONTENT #109 D3017 13.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12 - 16± 92.5%. 88 PASS C114 CONTENT #1 10 D3017 14.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12 - 16 t 96.4%, 88 PASS Cl 15 CONTENT #111 D3017 15.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12 - 16 t 99.2%, 88 PASS C116 CONTENT #112 D3017 12.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%,12 - 16± 91.3%, 88 PASS C117 CONTENT #113 D3017 12.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12 - 16 t 100%, 106 PASS C118/ CONTENT #114 D3017 13.2 P17 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922 90%, 12 - 16 * 98.7%, 106 PASS C119/ CONTENT #115 D3017 14.7 P16 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR89 1 LB/CF PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT #1 @ 1 @ 15.096 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 112.8 LB/CF 90 PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT #1 @ 15.2% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 114.6 LB/CF 91 PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT #1 014.3% - 5H - CLAY BARRIER LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA I FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #1 D5084 -5 -6 1.Ox 10 cm/sec 3.8x 10 92 PASS P4/ cm/sec C9 -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #2 D5084 1.000 cm/sec 2.3x10 93 PASS PSI cm/sec cis -5 -7 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #3 D5084 1.000 cm/sec 4.6x10 94 PASS P6/ cm/sec C21 -5 -6 P7/ TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #4 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 4.Ox 10 95 PASS C43 cm/sec -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #5 D5084 1.000 cm/sec 2.8x10 96 PASS P8 cm/sec /C32 -5 -6 P91 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #6 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 3.8x10 97 PASS C49 cm/sec -5 -7 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #7 D5084 1.0x 10 cm/sec 8.5x20 98 PASS P10/ cm/sec C53 -5 -6 P111 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #8 D5084 1.000 cm/sec 6.1x10 99 PASS C70 cm/sec -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #9 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 3.5x10 100 PASS P12/ cm/sec c68 -5 -6 P131 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #10 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 7.2x10 101 PASS C81 cm/sec -5 -5 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #11 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 1.3x10 102 FAIL P14/ cm/sec C94 -5 -6 P15/ TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #12 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 5.9x10 103 PASS C94 (RETEST OF #11) cm/sec -5 -5 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #13 D5084. 1.000 cm/sec 1.0x10 104 PASS P16/ cm/sec C119 -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #14 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 4.7x10 105 PASS P17/ cm/sec 0118 -51- FF 011 : HCC A T C PHONE N0. : 9147628863 Jun. 09 1998 12:45PM P11 Advance Testing Company, Inc. E 2.2 Sarah Wells Trail + Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 495-1800 Report of Sieve Analysis of Fine/Coarse Aggragatm Test Metbod: AASHTO T27 ASTM 0136 Client: Hudson Canyon ConstructionPro ject:r-- Castle Paint Landfill Source: Southern Dutchess- Mon ford, ATC Pro`At #: 970210 Sampled: 5/22/98 Sam led' Bv:y D. Vellone Tested: 5126198 Tested Bv: R. Morrison ATC Lab # 9"253D ling Location in nlace Lab No. 9R -02153D Sieve %Ret % Pass I Sec. 4" 0.0 100.0 3" 0.0 100,0 2" 0.0 100.0 1.5" 0.0 100.0 1" 0.0 100.0 100 314" 0.0 100.0 1/211 0.0 100.0 114" 0.9 99.1 #4 0.0 99.0 #10 1.0 98.1 #20 1.8 96.3 #30 1.7 94.6 #40 2.7 91.9 #80 13.4 78.4 #200 7.3 71.1 Pan 711 1 0.0 Comments: Minus #200 by wash. Sample #98-0253D complies with specifications. Reppq Reviewed Sv iecifioation ect Spec. 3.01 -1 3 FROM : HCC A T C PHONE NO. : 914762BB63 Jun. @9 1998 12:46PM P12 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 + (914) 49$-1600 Re rt of Sieve Anal ais of Fine/Coarse Aggregates Test Method: AASHTO T27 ASTM 0136 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction • f aro'ect: _r Castle Point Landfill Source: Southern. Dutchess Sand & Gravel ATC Project #: 970210 Sams lets; 5/28/98 Sampled By: M. Nie er Tested: 5129/98 Tested Dv: M, Creeden ATC Lab #1 Sample Type Sam lin Location S eCificalion 99-4269 1 Clay Bar ler In-place Pro'. Spcc. Item 3.01.2 ATC Lab 0 45LA144 Sieve Size Metric U.S. % Retained % % Pass Passing Spec, 25.0 mm 1.0" 0,0 100.0 10cl 19.0 mm i 314" 0.0 100.0 12.5 mm 1l2" 0.3 99.7 6.30 mm 114" 1.2 98,5 4.75 mm #4 0.3 98.2 2.00 mm #10 1.6 96.7 .8.50 mm #20 13 93.4 .600 mm #30 2.5 90.9 .425 mm #40 3.4 87.5 .180 mm #80 10.3 77.2 ,075 mm #200 7.8 59.4 Pan 69.4 0.0 Comments: Minus #200 by wash. Sample complies with specification. Report Reviewed BY: 5-5 FROM : HCC A T PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Jun. 23 195E 10:46RM PS Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail + Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Uastle rol ;: Hudson Canyon Constniction ATC Ppjcct #: 970210 ed: 614/98 Sampled B. Schutz 618/98 Tested Bv: D. Karl ATC Lab # Sample Type Sampling Location SN. 98-4298 Clay Barrier in-place n ATG Lab # 109—naog Sieve Size mm inches % Rets' %PASS. % Past S"C• 25.0 mm 1" 0.0 100.0 100 19.0 mm 3/4" 0.0 100,0 12.5 mm 112" 0.0 100.0 9.5 mm 318" 0.0 100.0 4.75 mm #4 0.0 100.0 2.D mm #10 0.3 99.7 ,860 mm #20 1.0 98.7 .600 mm #30 1.2 97,6 425 mm #40 2.6 95,0 .180 Mm #80 10.4 84.6 .075 mm 9200 8.2 76A Pan 76.4 Comments; Minus #200 by wash. Specification: High percent of fines is desirable. Sample complies with specificabon. Ra Reviewed B cification Snec, 3.0 1.2 rROM FICC PHONE NO. : 914762eB63 Jur 23 1999 1C . 52AM P16 A Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail -Campbell Hall, NY 10916-(914)496-1600- Fax (914) 496-1395 t. C ;. On-site ed: 6!$198 6110198 ATC Lab #7 Sam le 98-0311 A Clay Fill Project; Castle Poi ATC Project #: 970210 Samoled BY: B. Sch= Location ! 5 ATC Lab 4 AO Al ! A sieve Size rnrn inches °IV RetRin. % % Pass. gpec, 25,0 mm 1" 0,0 100.0 100 12.5 mm 112" M 1000 9.5 mm 4.75 mm 318" #4 0.0 0.6 100.0 99.4 2.00 mm .850 mm #10 #20 0.8 2.7 98.6 95.9 #30 3.4 92.5 #40 5.4 87,1 L.425rnm #8016.4 71.0 #20010.5 60.1 Pan 60.1 Comments; Minus #200 by Wash. Specification: High percent of fines is desirable, Sample complies with specificabon. ReNrr Reviewed BY: 3.01 5� FROM HCC PHONE NCI: : 9147628663 Jun, 23 1996 10:58AM P29 A T Advance Testing Company, Inc. Q ' Fffi 2 Sarah Wells Trail -Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496.1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Hudson Can on Construction Project: Castlz Point Landfill e: On-site ATC Project 0: 970210 led: 6/9/98 Sam led By: D. "Vellone 1: 6/12/98 Tested B A. Kyte ATC Lab #1 Sam le T e Sampling Location I Specification 98-031$ Cla Battier Stockpile I Pro . S c. 3.01.2 ATC Lab # Q%LAIA 19 Sieve Size Metric U.S, % Retained % % Pass Passing SPec- 25.0 mm 1.0" 0.0 100.0 100 19.0 mm 314" 0.0 100.0 12.5 mm 1/2" 0.2 99.8 6.30 mm 1/4" 1.5 98.3 4.75 mm #4 0.1 98.2 2.00 mm #10 0.8 97.4 .850 mm #20 1.7 957 600 mrn #30 1.9 93.8 1428 mm #40 3.6 90.2 .180 mrn #80 17.4 72.8 .075 Trim #200 13.0 59.8 Pan 59.8 0.0 Comments! Minus #200 by wash. Sample complies with specification. Report Reviewed k. vel FROM HCC PHONE NO. : 9147628863 3un� 23 1996 10.59RM P31 A Advance 'Testing Company, Inc. ( T 8 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916,(914) 496-1600 - Fax (914) 496-1398 Of Si Hudson Ciao on Construction e. Lift # ; acre # 1-2 led; 6110198 t: 5112!98 .ATC Lab_ #1 Sample Type 98-0263 1 Clay Barrier Fine/Coarse Pro'ect. Castle Point Landfil ATC Project #; 970210 Sampled By; B. Schutz Tested gvt A. K','te n ATC Lab # 98-©263 Prel. Sieve Size Metric U.S. % % % Pass Retained Passing SPai. 25.0 rnm 1.0" 0.0 100,0 100 19.0 mm 314 0.0 100.0 12:5 mm 112" 0.0 100.0 6.30 mm 114" 0.0 100.0 4.75 mm #4 2.6 97.4 2.00 mm #10 1.1 96.3 .850 mm #20 2,0 94.3 .600 mm #30 1.7 92.6 .425 mrn #40 2.9 89.6 180 mm #80 11.8 77.9 ,,075 mm #200 11.9 66.0 Pan 66.0 0.0 Comments; Minus #200 by wash. Sample complies with specification. keM Reviewed BX: on 57 rROM HCC T PHONE NO. : 9147628863 3urt. 23 195E 10-45RM P3 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496.1600 Specification: Plasticity is desirable. Comments: Sample complies with specification. Report Reviewed By: T FROM • . HCC A r T PHONE NO. : 5147628863 Jun. 23 1558 10:46AM P4 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 495-1600 umber: 98.0276 l Limit: NIA " r- Limit: N/A city Index: NP Specification. Plasticity desirable. Notes: ** The soil characteristics of this sample do not allow for the liquid limit or the plastic limit to be determined. Therefore, the plasticity index is 'non -plastic'. e Re ort Reviewed By'. (0I FROM HCC Fr rr�7. 4 ra db ;sur. 1U: t)bHM F::�; A T Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Lab Number: 98-0293A 98-029: Liquid Limit: 17.6 20.3 Plastic Limit: N/A'* N/A** Plasticitv Index' NIA*" NIA** !Votes'. — The soil characteristics of this sample do not allow for the plastic limit to be determined. Therefore, there is no plastiolty index for this sample. Specification: Plasticity is desirable, Re ort Reviewed 9 FROM WCC PHONE NO. : 9147628862 Tun. 23 1996 10:48AM P9 A Advanee Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Mall, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496.1398 Notes: Specification: Plasticity is desirable. Sample complies with specification- Report pecification_ Re ort Reviewed BY' (03 FROM HCS' A f T PHONE NC. 9147628SEZ Jun. 23 1998 10 : 57AM F26 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Nall, NY 10916 • (914) 498-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Number: 98-030: id Limit: 17.6 tic Limit: NIA " ticity Index: NIA ** Notes: " The soil characteristics of this sample do not allow for the plastic limit to be determined_ Therefore, there is no piasticity index for this sample. Specification: Plasticity is desirable. Report Reviewed l3 ,PiROM :, HCC A { T C PHONE NO. : 914762BB63 Jur,. 23 199E 10:57AM P27 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Carnoell Half, NY 10916 • (914) 496.1600 - Fax (914) 496-1398 Report of Atterberg Umfts Test Results Test Method= ASTM D4318 AASHTO T89 T90 Client: I Hudson Can on Construction Pro ect: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barnet PEq' t #: 970210 Source: On-site Second Lift Sec . ification: Pro , Spec. 3.01.2 Saar led: 618198 Sam led BY: S. Schutz Tested: 6/10/98 Tested BY, K. Johnson Notes: w* The soii characteristics of this sample do not allow for the plastic limit to be determined. Therefore, there is no plasticity index for this sample, Specification, Plasticity is desirable, Report Reviewed B ; PROM > HCC PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Jun. 23 1998 10*56RM P2E Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1604 - Fax (814) 496-7398 Lab Number: 98-0318 Liquid Limit: 17.4 Plastic limit: NIA *" Piasticity Index: NIA Notes: — The soil characteristics of this sample do not allow for the plastic limit to be determined. Therefore, there is no plasticity index for this sample. Specificati= Plasticity is desirable. Re ort Reviewed BY: FROM ; HCC A � T PHONE NO. : 9147628863 .Turf. 23 1996 10:59AM P30 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 2-2 Sarah Wens Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Specification: Plasticity is desirable. Comments: Sample complies with specification. Civ' tw d 1 GI FROM :,HCC A T PHONE NO. : 914762E863 Jun. 23 1996 10:.45RM P'2 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Niall, NY 10918 • (914) 496-1600 of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and .«­ .s_.L. A. eeTiu n9945 __22 ATC Lab No_: 98-263A 98-2636 98-2530 Wet Wei ht 2515.6 2914.7 2553.7 Dry Weigh 2210,4 2556.2 2254.0 Nat. MoFSture: 93.8 14.0 13.5 Report Reviewed By'_ �' JUN - 2 FR€]M : HCC A T PHONE NO. : 914762886,E ,Tun. 09 1998 12:42PM P5 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail + Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 Report of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 - 92 Client Hudson Canyon Fyi D et: Castle Point Landfill Ftem: C! Barrier Project #: 970210 rce: S. Dutchess Sand & Gravel ATC Lab M. 98-0269 Data Sam led: 5128198 Sam ed l3v., M. Meyer Date Tested: 5128198 lTested B : M, Craederi ATC Lab No.: 98-0269 Spec. ,Wet -Weight 568.2 Dry Weight 475.7 Nat Mois#wr'e: 19,4 12-16 Notes: Sampled from in-place material. Sample complies With section 3.01C.18 of project specification. Bulk sample 0 -1,000 cubic yards, Moisture content does not comply with specification; to be corrected by on-site drying. Reviewed r FROM : HCC �A T PHONE NO. : 914762086Z ,Tun. 23 1996 10:51RM P15 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 + (914) 496.1600 rt of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock T__..—III .ii. eQTNI n*94t% . 92 ATC Lab No.; 96-0273 Wet Weight–T-432.7 D Wei tit 371.8 Nat. MOW'Ura: 16.4 Report Reviewed SV' ?I 7-o F�Om . HCC A { T PHONE NC. : 9147E26867 - Tun. e9 1996 12: 4CPM PC) Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 Report of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 - 92 lent: Hudson Canyon Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: J Clay Barrier Rro'ect #: 970210 Some: 5_ Dutchess Sand & Gravel ATC Lab #: 98-0276 Date Sampled: 5129198 Samolsd B M, Meyer Date Tested: 5129-8/1/98 IM, Creeden ATC Lab No.: 984276 Spec. Wet Weight 910.8 Dry Weight 793.6 % Nat. Moisture: 1 14.8% 12-16 Notes: Sampled from in-place material. Sample complies with section 3.01 C.16 of project specification. Built sample 1,000 - 2,000 cubic yards. Moisture content complies with specirication_ c Re rt Reviewed B : 7I Y c I A T C PHONE NO. : 9147628863 ; � Jury. 09 1998 12: 48PM P15 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail a Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496.1600 of Soil and 92 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Rro t: Castle Point Landfill kern: Clay Barrier project tk: 970210 Source: On-site First Lift ATC Lab #: W0293 Date Sampled: 8/2/98 Sampled ft: C, Devlin Date Tested: 6%3/98 Tested K. Johnson ATC Lab No,: 98-0293A 98-02398 Wet Weight 503.2 667.4 D Weight 440.4 686.9 % Nat. Moisture: 14.3 17.7 Report Reviewed By. 7z FPOM .HCC A PHONE NO. : 9147626863 j;xr . Z3 1999 117 : 47AM P6 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Tail + Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 4961600 ATC Lab No.: 98-0302 Wet Wei ht 626.7 D Wei ht 526.4 % Nat. Moisture: 't9. i Report Reviewed B 73 FRal : , HC` T PHONE NO. : 9147626663 Jur. 23 1996 10:46AM R6 Advance Testing Companyy Inco ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail * Campbell Hall, NY 10916 * (914) 496-1606 F C L�bN: 98-0298 et W 643.6 0 Wel ht 528,8 % Nat. Moisture: 21.7 Report Reviewed BY: s' 74 FROM :.HCC 'A T PHONE NO. : 914762SE63 Jun. 23 199E 10:G9RM PID Advance Testing Company., Inc. IN 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10915 • (914) 495-1600 rt of Natural Moisture Content of Sail and stock ,r.+ umm%m . a -TM D2216 - 92 ATC Lab No.: 98-0309 Wet Weight 1116.7 Dry Weight 990.9 Net. Moist.Ure: 12.7 Re ort Reviewed By' O . -15 FROM HCC A # T PHONE NO. : 914762(386:3 JUrL. 2Z 1996 10: SOAh1 Pi) Advance TeSting Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Walls Frail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 of Natural MAoisture Content of Soil and Rock wcru rs994R- 92 ATC Lab No.; 98-0$11 C Wet Wei tit 832.7 8941D Weight . Naistu".6/t. More: 4 i Report Reviewed SV +i 7G FROM :. HCC' T PHONE NO. : 9147620863 .Jur.. 2� 1598 10:51AM P14 Advance Testing Company, Inc. M 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 0 (914) 496-1500 of Nature MoisturO Content of Sail and dock __. ■i_.a....a. ACYM n794 _ 92 ATC Lab No.; 98-0327 Wet Wei ht 11983 Dry Weight '1058. S % Nat. Moisture: 13.2 Report Reviewed BY: ill{ 37 FROM, .w HCC A T PHONE NO. : 914762886,E Jun. 23 1998 31:01AM P34 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hail, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Re ort of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM .2216 - 92 C Canyon Hudson Caon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barrier Pro ect #: 970210 Source: 4n -site ATC Lab W. 98-0318 Date Sam led: 619198 Sampled By- D.Veilone pate Tested: 6111198 Tested By-, K, Johnson ATC Lab No.: 98.0318 Wet Wei ht 639.4 Dry Weight : 547,5 % Not. Moisture: 16.8 -Report Reviewed B ■LJ =ROM : HCC A T C PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Jun. 09 1998 12:40PM P2 Advance Testing Company., Inc. _ 22 Sarah Wells Trail Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • .,r.. _ REPORT OF Ft1t,"I.,D COMPACTION TESTS '+'A+ 9 TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction TEST EQUIP: Gauge No. 1 WEAT MER Sunnyielear Test No Date Depth 1 Elev 1 5128 6" -'Clay barrier 2 5128 6" -"Clay barrier 3 5129 6" -'Clay barrier A 5128 6" -'Clay barrier 5 5128 6" -'Clay barrier 6 5128 6" -"Clay barrier 7 5128 6" -'Clay barrier 8 5/28 6" -'Clay ba mer 9 5/28 6" -`Clay baniet Legend 'Elevation, 1st Lift PROJECT: Castle Poiret Landfill DATE: 05!28198 REPORT: 970210- 2 Technwan `IVTMeper - -.- SNo( x Wawr In Pleas campact Code 1414-10 Dry Cont Dry Den. (%) _-. Test Location 3 114.1 14.0 111.6 a 97.9 AA '54 S of gas vent #13 G 3 114.1 T 7,� 108.7 95.3 1Ati, '93 S of gas vent #1366-sEF_ zors-!"r AWa,4z 3 114,1 16.2 709.5 96.0., .1A t36 S, '36 W of gas vent #13 C-7./ ✓. 3 114.1 16.5 108,4 95.1 1A 130 E of gas vent #16 (moiswre sample taken C -t 3 114.1 14.2 112.2 98.4 1A '33 W, '27 N of gale vent #18 (Shelby taken)Fij ✓ ^- P� 3 114,1 16.4 109.3 95.6 1A '33 W, 24 S of gas vent #16 Gto ✓ 3 114.1 13.8 109.0 95,6 1A '21 W, '12 N of gas vent #12 C Aj-" 3 114,1 14.8 105.4 92.4 1A 11 W, '21 S of gas vent #12 CA:" 3 114.1 16.5 108.8 95.4 1A 23 W1 S of gale vent #11 C.As IMPORTANT NOTES ~EprtSentative5 of Hudson Canyon Construction ware present and aware of test resuMs. FEND A# densities reported as pounds per cubic loot :ampacdon % is based an mawinum dry density tbUirmO -a sample indicated by sail ID number wspek .ly submivad ADVANCE TES77NG Co. -Coxes 11) TILL tiblrMWAL 7) BACKFILL A) Tedi R&Wfts CaMrrply 3) BASE COURSE B), 0%warpecdon Required s) SUBBASE C) Alfer Recompoedon 57 sarL c�Irelvr 8) FROM : HCC A T C PHONE N0. : 9147628863 .jun. 09 1998 12:41PM P Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 ° (9i4) 496-1600 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon COnStruetion PROJECT: Cash !''*int Landfill TEST MUIP: Gauge No. 2 DATE, 05/29/98 WEATHER! HotlOvercast REPORT: 97-0210- 3 Technician F, Barrett est No. Date Depth 1 Elev Soil No Max Water Dry Den Cont In Place Dey Den. Compact {°%) code w Test Location H&P 1 05129 6" --Clay Barrier 3 114.1 14,3 109.7 96.1 IA, 20'E of Can vent 10 C-I�} 2 0529 6" --Clay Barrier 3 114.1 13.4 1"112 97-6- 1.A _ 10'S and IM Of 906 vent 10 C- t!5*' 3 05129 6" --Clay Barrier 3 114.1 12.4 11$.9 99.8 .. 1A Between. (center) of gas vents 15 and 1I Ct(a,✓ 4 050-9 6" --Clay gamer 3 114,1 12.9 110.6 97.0 to 15' off lanoa and 30'E of gays vent 15 C0- 5 05129 6" --Clay Hamer 3 114.1 16.6 105,4 92.4 1A Center of gas vents 11 and 9 C-1$/ NA&Li3i P5`� 6 05129 6" --Clay Barrier 3 11.4.1 14.4 113.3 9Q-3 1A 40'N and 20'E of gas vent 10 CII✓ .-agend tMPORTANT NOTE$ 'rant, of Hudson Canyon Con9truction, was present and aware of test resalts. LEGOWD All densities reported AS pounds per cubic foot .ompac*on % is ,based an niawimtem dry density *bWK ?i sample indiaarod by sot 1D number Respectfully submitted ADVANCE TESTING Co. �•sati 1) FILL MMATMAL 2) BACKMLL A) rest Rasults Comply 3) aAS5 COURSE a) RecompwVon Required 4) SUIll"86 C) After Recompact w 5) $WI~ t AWENT 6) Other rF-mom : HCC PHONE N0. : 9147628663 Jun. 09 1998 12:42PM P4 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • CamPbeil Hall, IVY 10916 • (914) 496-16f]a MPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TE5Ts TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill TEST EQUIP: Gauge No. 8 DATE, 06!07/98 WEATHER: Partly Cloudy 75F fWPORT: 97-0210- 4 Technician D. Ve4one est No Dere Depth /Eley SMI No Max Water In Place Dry Den Cant Dry Dan. Compact .._Code {•,4) Test i-ocatfon 1 811 4" -Litt 1 1 114.1 13.4. 113.8 99.8 A, 34'from PVG-13.651tom end bndry rnxr(mplcmi shelb C.ZD � 2 6/1 4" -Lift t 1 114.1 15.8 1'#2.0 98.2: 1A .33*on PVG5,ITfrom side bndry (sheiby taken) cz4- - P4✓ 3 6/1 4" -Lift 1 1 114.1 14.8 112.6 96.6 iA 47` from PVC -5, 2r from side boundary 02.1-`� 4 6/1 4' -Lift 1 1 114.1 16,6 110.9 97.3 1A 18' from side boundary 85' from PVG.4= 5 6/1 4' - loft 1 1 114.1 17. 107.4 94,1 1A EE 21' from side boundary 54' tram PVG�iS Ttq 6 6/1 4" -Lift 1 1 114.1 15.3 110.2 96.6 1A 247' from PVC -A inline bA PVC -,moi and PVG-2(,.W ✓ 7 6/1 4" -Llft 1 1 114.1 14.7 108.1 94.7 1A 15' from PVG4,150' from PVG-1 GZ4--' 8 fill 4" -Lift 1 1 114,1 12.9 119,0 973 1A 18' from PVG-3 line G Z?V 9 611 4" -Lift 1 1 114.4 13.3 107.1 934 1A 40' from P VG -9 line with PVC74 C7,0 10 6/1 4" -Lift 1 1 114.1 14,1 104.9 9_ 4., 1A 25' from PVG-9 line with PVG-10 G15� 11 6/1 4" -Lift 1 1 114,1 15.4 141.3 97.5 1A 25' from PV" line with PVG-a G3o'l 12 $/1 13 6/1 4" 4" -Lift 1 -Lift 1 1 1 114.1 174.1 18.0 i6.1 149,3 i 12,2 95.8 98.3 1A 20' from PVG15 iniina withPVG-8 C.3 ✓ 1�Y� ✓ 1A 10' from PVG7G3��5t1 14 611 4" -Lift i 1 _1114.1 (ar&) 107.9 94.6 1A I V from PV04CW.5 S_ XETFESTG may, IMPORTANT NOTES Rep'; tadves of Hudson Canyon Constmckn, Frank, was present and more of test results. LEGEND Aft densitils reported as pounds per cubic foot Contprdon % is based on aixdmum dry dousity w:ample indicated by sof1 ID numbeF RespecaUfty submitted ADVANCE TES77NO Co. 'CODES 1) FILA. M47ER14L 2) BACKPYLL A) Test Resuhs Comply 3) SASE COURSE B) Recompoctfon Required .4) SUBBASE C) AftwRocampacdon 5) SOIL CEMENT 0) FROM : HCC A T PHONE N0. : 9147626663 Jury. 23 1995 10:52AM P1 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOIA: Hudson Canyon COnStructian TEST EQUIP. Gauge Pio. 2 wEATHER: Sunny 75 t=. PROJECT, Castle Point Landfill DATE: 06102198 REPORT: 97-0210. 5 Test 1A 1A "See "and for location delAils. G34 ✓ Soil Max water to ptaea No Date RETESTC3? - I%F-TT-ST 3 No Dry Den Cont Dry! Den. 1 002" 1A -$" 1 St. lift 1 114.1 12.2 915.4 2 Wp2 6" -6" 1 St. lift 1 114.1 12.9 110.4 3 0B102 4" -5" 1st. lift 1 114.1 14.5 110.5 a 06102 6" -6" 1st. lift 1 114.1 14.1 109.4 5 06102 6" -6" 1 st lift 1 114.1 12.8 113.8 6 05102 6" -6" 1st. lift 1 1141 12.9 112.$ 7 06/02 4" -6" 1st, lift 1 114.1 14.0 107.0 8 06/02 5" -t5" 1st. lift 1 114.1 13.6 111.5 n W02 6" -6" 1st. lift 1 114,1 12.8 112.4 10 08102 6" -6- 1st. lift 1 114.1 13.4 1067 "LOCATION: Clay Harrier at 1 St Iin - noted on plans (Franks set). Legend Coesle Technician C. Devlin Test L6-CUU I 00+ 96.8 1A 1A "See "and for location delAils. G34 ✓ GSL✓ 96.9 96.9 1A 1A RETESTC3? - I%F-TT-ST 3 99.7 '1A - C' _6b"' - GV 99.9 1A 93.7 97.7 1A 1 A R e- 40 RETEST G 441 - (LSI -e T r- 96.5 1A RETEST CAZ 94,7 1A ' Cil✓S�" �'1 `� IMPORTANT NOTES FranK, of Hudson Canyon Ganstructian, was present and aware of test rasults, LEGEND Ali densities reported as pounds per cultic foot Compaction % Is based on maximum dry density {{obtained on sample indicated by soil !D number l 'jecpfufly submitted ADVANCE TESTING Co, 'CODES 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKPIL.L A) Test R=uffs Comply 3) BASE COURSE B) Recompac#ion Required 4) SUBBASE C After Recornpactl0n 5) SOIL CEMENT ) 6) Other FROM HCC 'A T i PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Jun. 23 1998 10:53AM P18 Advance ?eating Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 (914) 496-1600 It6PORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TEST63FOR: Hudbon Canyon construction TEST EQUIP: Gauge No- 1 WEATHER- Sunny 65 F. t4 t Date Depth 110011 Solt Max Water in Place No Dry Don Cont Dry Den. PROJECT: Castie Point t-endl'ill DATE: 06/04198 REPORT; 97-0210. 6 Technician B, Sthutz 1 06104 4" -2nd lift 3 114.1 15.6 102.9 2 06144 4" -2nd lift 3 11.4.1 14.6 110.3 3 06104 a" -2nd lift 3 114.1 14.5 io9.5 4 06104 4' -2nd lift 3 114.1 13.1 112.4 5 06104 4" -2nd lit! 3 114.1 13.1 110.6 6 06/04 4" -2nd lift 3 114.1 14.2 10510 7 06104 d" -2nd lift 3 114.1 13.8 107.8 a 06104 4" -2nd rift 3 114.1 14-3 106,1 A A-' lift 3 114.1 25.1 105.3 v� Lewmd Location: As shown on contractors' drawings Tact Code Test Location 90.2 rA "10'S of 14, 1 O'W of t4 C wle4 96.7 BA *4US of'4. 15W of iK "- W-' 19 C%.,/ 96.0 6A -11YN of 19, 12'E of 9$.6 6A '20'W of 19, BW of 19 CAI V ✓ 13 CQz,/ 97.o 92.o 6A 6A "WS of 13,18'W of *4'W of 19, 25S of 13 (Shelby Tube) P1 94,5 6A • $'E of 13, 5'S of 13 C,So `1 144:S 1 ✓ 94.8 6A SW of 14. 4'S of 13, 30'S of 13 92.3 $A 2o'E of IMPoRTAN'r NOTES Represerit8tives of Hudson Canyon Construction, Were pnOtent anti aware Of test results. LEGEND All dm yip€ MPortad es pounds per cubic hoot Cerupacbon % is breed on nraxlmurh dry dMS11Y obtained a" sample InWeated by soil ID humber Aseftify submitted ADVANCE TE$77NG Ca. 4'3 *COJDES 2) BACKFILL FILL AL 2) A) rest ResuM COMPly 3) BASE COURSE B) Recompacdcp Required 4) sUBBASE C) After RecwnPHcti*n 31 SOIL CEMONT 0) Other k- MOM : HCC A f T PHONE NO. : 9147E28C63 jun. 23 1996 10:33AM P19 Advance Testing Company., Inc. r 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hail, NY 10916 - (91 4) 496-1600 REPORT of FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TF.S'fF.O FOR: Hudson Canyon Gonstruction PRQJECT: Castle Point l..andfll3 Gauge No. 8 DATE, 061051913 TEST EQUIP: uJ Teonician )3, Vellone titEEPoRT: 97-021 a 7 wrwATHER: Clear Vo Date oepth ! Elev 1 06104 4" -2nd. 6" lift 2 06104 4" -2nd. 6" Iift 3 06V 4" -2nd. 6" lift 4 46/04 4" -2nd, 6" lift 5 06104 4" -2nd. 6" Vt fi 06104 4" -2nd. 8" lift 7 ,05104 4" -2nd. 6"lift c. �w. F, rrorV'4 y --A Soil Max Water In Place No Ory Den Cont DrY Oen, 1 114.1 14.6 111.0 1 114.1 13.2 113.1 1 114.1 14.9 111.4 1 114.1 15.1 111.4 1 114.1 14.6 104.1 1 114.1 14.8 114.2 1 114.1 14.2 105.4 y 114.1 13.1 195.8 pact Code Tset Lvcmfic'" MyQ $11e' 97.0 1A 10' from PGV-10 (ShWby Tube S VnPle) G53 P10 98.8 1A 18'.fmm PGV-9 ' cu 97.3 1A 20' from PGV CSS�5 GS�� 97.3 1A 15' from PGV-9 i 9io 96.2 IA 1A 20' from PGV-1 50' from F(3V-11 C-sa ✓� 92.1 1A 30' trorn PGV-15C-50l 95.1 1 A 15' from PGV-11, 18' from wells IMPORTANT NOTES Representatives of Hudson Canyon Construction, were present and awafe of Writ resufs, LEO ND FAIIarSFOW-w noportrld as poundsperoU&4foot onbon %. is based an maximum dry denafty ed on sr►mok itwdlcated by $ni11D number +ragony cubmHted ADVANCE TESTVC Co. 'CODES V i) Wu. mATERiat A is Teat Reffa Comply Z} SACKWt-L 3} BASE COURSE a} Rotrompact►a► Req~ j SUBBASEENT C} After RoewnPOCOOn ML C81W 61 Ottrer FROM '.HCC PHONE NO. : 914762686 Sur,. 23 1996 10:54AM P20 Advance Testing Company,, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail m Campbell Hall, NY 10916 * (914) 496.1600 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FDR Hudson Canyon Construction PRf]JECT Gsst}e point Landfill TEST EQUIP: Gauge No. 1 DATE: 0610f1198 WEATHER- cloudy 65 F REPORT: 97-0210- S Technician U. S4hutx .est code sal Marc Wow in Place Com No Data Depth 1 Elegy No Dry Den Cant Dry Den. I 1 618 F -2nd lift 1 114.1 11.6 109.3 2 we er -2nd lift 1 114.1 14,7 104.2 3 we 6" -2nd rift 1A 114.1 13.5 106.0 4 616 6" -2nd lift 1 114,1 13.0 105.7 5 618 f" -2nd lift 1 114.1 1.4.4 106,5 g 618 S' -2nd tiff 1 114,1 14.1 110.3 7 818 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 14.8 108.2 8 61$ 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 113 196,4 9 518 6" - 2nd lift 1 114.1 12.6 108.0 10 818 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 14.4 111.2 11 618 6 -2nd lift 1 114.1 14.5 112.1 12 618 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 14.8 108.? 13 618 6" "2nd lift 1 114.1 113 112,8 .. cin Al '2nd lift 1 114,1 14.7 10910 L Legend act code Test Location t4A,P VCE% 95.8 16 As sncwn✓on Contractors' drawings. CGj " 91.4 1AC " CW- 92.9 1A " Com✓ 92.7 1A " C6`( 93.+4 1A " C 963 1A "4±. " " 94.9 1A r-&7 V/ " (Shelby7Ube) (NMC sample? 93.2 1A " " 05 " 84.7 97.5 1A IA "Cp ✓ (Shelby Tube) P I 98.3 to G?(✓ " " G?.I-� 95.3 1A " C,71 M 98,9 1 A "G-'✓ " 95.6 1A IMPORTANT NOTES A entative of Hudson Canyon Construction. Frank, was present and aware df test resutts. LEGEND tr4u densities reported ars pounds per tubio foot Compoa@on `& is based on meiril»um dry density a!+"^'ned on sample indicated by sail 1D number fectfully sut mdred ADVANCE TES77NG Co. •CODES T) 11tATEPlAL BA 2J BAClLF1LL A) Teat ReSW& COMMY 3) RASE COURSE 9) Recornpecliion ReWir*d 4) SUBBASE C) After Rec0mpec6* t 5) $OlL CEMENT 6) FROM :,HCC T PHONE N0. : 9147628862 .jun. 23 1898 10:54AM P21 Advance Testing Company., Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Welts Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 REPORT OF F1ELP COMPACTION TEM TESTER FOR: Hudson Canyon construction TEST EQUIP: Gauge No. 3 WFJITHER: Clear Soil fest wo 090 Depth 1 Elev No 1 619 4" -Uft2 1 2 619 4" - Lift 2 1 3 6I9 4" - Lift 2 1 4 6/9 X. -Lift 2 1 5 619 4" -Lift 2 1 6 519 4" -Lift 3 1 7 619 4" -Uft 3 � 8 618 4" -Uft 3 1 g g/g 4" -Lift 3 114.1 A. .i M'1 1 Legend PROJECT: Castle Poirit Landfill DATE: 06!09198 REPORT; 97-0210- 9 Technician D, Velton ww WNW in Piwo ry Dan Cont Ory Den. 114,1 13.2 113.9 114.1 11.9 114.4 114,1 1111 112•5 114.1 14.4 114.4 114.1 15.0 110,4 114,1 13.6 113.1 114.1 14.0 115.1 114.1 12.4 117.8 114.1 13.2 119.6 114.1 12.6 110.8 rw Code -test Location k -I 99.8 1A 30' from PGV-1 C')T✓ 10' from PGV-3 C_'K- "� 1001 1A ".6 1A 30' f m PGV-14 C.'T7`/ �Q 100+ 08.8 1A 1A 5' from PGV-14 C 26' fry+ PGV-14 C f 09.1 1A 15' from PGV-13 o✓ �✓ 100+ 1A 40' from PGV-16 Shelby tope C t i - 100+ 1A 25' from PGV-iE G8?_ from PGV-160.$3` / 1004- 97.2 1A 1A 20' 20' from PGV-16 C$'j- `l IMPORTANT NOTES A representative of Hudson Canyon Construction, Frank, was Present and aware of test results. LEGEND All densit144 reported as poonds per cubic foot COMMW ion X 14 based on maximum dry density obtained on sample indicated by soil ID number Rf,, .ati'ully s.bmhftd ADVANCE TESTING co. -CODES 340 F MATERLiII A) Test Resuks ComplyCKRLLSE COURSE 8) Rocompwdon Regalted BBASE C) Ater ReoompaCOOnL CEMENT a� 'k FROM : HCC { T PHONE NO, : 514762BB67 Jun. 23 1999 10:55AM P23 Advance Testing company, Inc. r 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496.1600 TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction TEST EQUIP: Gauge No, 14 WEATHER: Sunny 75F REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT; Castle Point Landfill DATE: 06110198 REPORT: 97-0210. 10 Technician E- Sch�x _ Ao�gMr1�► LEGEND All densWes reported as Pounds Per cubic foot er Compaction % is based on n%exlmum dry depsifY IM obtained on uoampfe indicated by soil ID number ADVANCE 7ES7 MG Co. T) FILL MATERIAL A) Teat Resaffs CWMP& 2) BACKRLL 3) BASE COURSE 41) Recompecow Rewired 4) SUBBASE C) After Recompacdon 5) SOIL CEMENT 6) MAP Test soil Max Water In Ptace Compact Code Test Loaetior+ No Dzts f-.prth I E1ev No Dry Den Cant Dry Den. (%? 1 6110 6" _ 3 1 114.1 13.8 114.6 IOU + 90.'3 1A 1A Uft 3 Acre 1 Lift 3 A cM 1 2 61'10 8" -tilt 3 1 114,1 14.1 113.5 �$-3 1 A Lift 3 Am 4 3 B110 6" - lift 3 1 114.1 15.0 112.2 97.2 1A Litt 3 Acre i *CA 4 6110 6" -lift 3 1 1 114.1 114.1 15.2 14-1 1110.9 114.5 100+ 1 A Lift 3 Acre 4 " C-89 ✓ 5 6110 6" -lift 3 1 114.3 13.4 109.1 95.6 1A Lift 3 Acre 4 " e -yo✓ 6 8110 6" -lift 3 1 114.1 15.4 108.7 95-2 1A lilt 3 Acre 2 ' C-4 7 6110 6" -IM 3 1 114.1 14.6 111.6 97.8 1A Lift 3 Ade 4 C-9 iv'/ / 8 6170 6' -kilt 3 3 1 1 i4.) 15.4 110.2 9fi.6 1A Lift 3 Acre 2C-13 J 9 6110 e" -lift 114.1 14.7 113.7 99-7 1A Lift 3 Acta 2 (shelby)(NML sample) 10 6110 6" -lift 3 -fift 3 1 1 114,1 14,7 112.7 96.6 1A Llft 3 Acre 1 ` G9s� 11 6110 6" 1 114.1 13.2 1 U.5 100+ 1 A Lift 3 Acre 1 • G%✓ 12 5110 6" -lift 3 1 114.1 12.7 110.6 97.0 iA LiR 3 Acre i ' G`1rj 13 6110 6" -lift 3 -Lacapon. (See contractors' site drawings for speoifte iocations) Legend IMPORTANT NOTES A represerdative of riudson Canyon Construction, Frank, waft present and 2"(8 Of test resuks, _ Ao�gMr1�► LEGEND All densWes reported as Pounds Per cubic foot er Compaction % is based on n%exlmum dry depsifY IM obtained on uoampfe indicated by soil ID number ADVANCE 7ES7 MG Co. T) FILL MATERIAL A) Teat Resaffs CWMP& 2) BACKRLL 3) BASE COURSE 41) Recompecow Rewired 4) SUBBASE C) After Recompacdon 5) SOIL CEMENT 6) FROM HCC A j T PHONE NC. : 9147x2666:3 jun, 23 1998 10:56AM P24 Advance Testing Company, Inc. 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496.1500 • Fax (914) 496-1398 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TES1W KOR. Hudson Canyon Construction TEST EQUIP: Gauge Ko. 6 WFATHERt Cloudy 65 rest No Date Depth 1 Eiev 1 6111 6" • lift 3 2 $J11 $ -lift 3 3 6111 G' -lift 3 4 6111 6" -lift 3 5 eli 1 6" -lift 3 6 6111 6" -lam 3 7 6111 6" -lift 3 8 6111 6" - lift 3 S 5111 6" -lift 3 14 '6111 6~ -lift 3 11 6111 6" -lift 3 12 6111 6" -lift 3 13 6111 6" -lift3 14 6111 6" -lift 3 15 6111 8' -lift 3 le 6/11 6" -lift 3 17 6111 6- -lift 3 Is 6111 6" -lift 3 i.r �J11 6" • lift 3 f 11 6" -lift 3 Legend Sail Max Water In Place No Dry Den Cont Dry Den. PROJECT; Castle Point Landfill DATE: 06111/98 REPORT; 97-0210. 11 Technician 13. S4bVtz 1 114.1 12.4 115.2 1 114.1 12.6 112.4 1 114.1 12.6 115.6 1 114.1 12.7 116.2 1 114.1 137 110.8 1 114.1 12.2 110.9 1 114,1 13.5 114.9 1 114.1 12A 112.1 1 114.1 12.7 112.2 1 114.1 12.1 110.5 1 114,1 13.4 111.4 1 114.1 12.4 117.2 1 114.1 12.6 11211 1 114.1 13.7 114.0 1 114.1 15.8 111.8 1 114.1 13.2 113.0 1 11A.1 14,3 105.5 1 114,1 15.4 109.9 1 114.1 12.2 113.2 1 114.1 12.2 104.2 Ct Coda 100+ IA lift 3 Acre 2 5 --"tom✓ 98.5 IA Litt 3 Acre 2 C-99 100+ 1A Lift 3 Acre 2 ctx►a✓ 100+ 1A Lift $ Acre 2 C--IOJ V 97.2 1 A 97,2 1 A Lift 3 Acre 2 C_to't Lift 3 Acre 1 C.W3✓/ 100+ 1A 98.2 Lift 3 Acre 1 C A014 V Lift 3 Acre 1 CtC�✓/ 1A 98.4 1A Lift 3 Acre 1 Cl;l j 96.8 1 A gift 3 Acre 4 C 97.6 1 A Lift 3 Acre 4 G Ida 100+ 1A ltft3Acre 3G 01 V/ - 1A Lilt 3 Acre 3 C V(0 100.0 1A Lift 3 Acre 3G11`v 95.0 1A Lilt 3 Acre 3 C- UI / 991 1A Lift 3 Acre 3 C_ R3 92.5 1 A Lift 3 Aer6 4 G l (14 96.4 IA Lift 3 Acre 4 CA15✓v� 99.2 1A Lift 3 Acre 4 C (4 / 91.3 1A Lift 3 Acre 4ptk j ImPORTANT NOTES A representative of Hudson Canyon Construction, Frani. was present and aware of test results. LEGEND All densities reported as pounds per cubic foot Cnmpaco" % is basad on maximum dry dcnafey obtained on sampie indicated by soil 0 number 4, 'ceulJy submitted ADVANCE Ti=S17NG Co. Test 4 c"on *CODES V V 4) ALL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) 7'ost ReWits CvmDly 3) BASE COURSE B) Racor�npaction 009uif@d 4) SUBBASE C) Ater RecomPactian 3) SOIL CEMENT 6) qr• �A ,FROM HCC PHONE N0. : 9147526853 Jun. 23 1999 11:00AM P32 A Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 * Fax (914) 496-1398 C CLIENT: Hudson Gan on c,onstrvenon r+1L r��L PROJECT: lCastle Point Landfill ATC L.AB W TEST METHOD: ASTM 698 'Standard' Method: SOIL ID NUMBER: 6 19.8 ITEM: clay Barrier SOURCE: Lift #3 Acre 01-2 SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown clayey silt DATE SAMPLED: 6110198 SAMPLED BY: S. Schutz DATE TESTED: 6112/98 TESTI=D BY, R. Morrison Moisture Density Relationship Individual Test Points Percent Moisture Dry Density 10.7 112.5 12.6 113.9 14.8 114.5 17.0 112.3 19.8 107.3 6/12/98 7—� , ••• Zero Air votCs Test Maximum Dry Density; Test Optimum Moisture Content: Percent Oversize Particles: Specific Gravity of Oversize: 114.6 44.3 0.0 NA ib/cu. ft. % % Corrected Maximum Dry Density Corrected Opt. Moisture Content. NIA NIA lb/cu. ft. % Report Reviewed by; s /* "�� ` 06/`02,'98 15:24 F_U 9144961398 ADVANCE TESTING 2004 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 109115 • (914) 496-1600 If ' ReDort of Triaxial Pearmeabillty Test Using Back Pressure _ 11 Client.: Hudson Canyon Construction Proect: Castle Point Landfill Item: 3.01 Clay Barrer La er ' y := ATC Pro ect #: 970290 Source: S. Dutchess Sand & Gravel_ ATC.LaN-#: 98-0269 Date Sampled: 5/28/98 Sam led B : M. Mayor Date Tested: 1512mil f98 Tested BX: C. Devlin Proctor Test Data ASTM Proctor Test Method: D696 Maximum D Denft PCF: 115.2 Optimum Moisture Content Percent of Dry Weight 15.2 Sample Pre ration Method: Soil clods brokenlchopped to pass 1/4" sieve. Compacted in 1cm lifts, scarred between lifts. Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After rest Hei ht, cm. 10.67 10.62 Diameter, cm: 7.28 7.27 Moisture Content, OA: 14.95 19.48 Dry Density, PCF: 109.58 110.39 Permeability Test Conditions Type cf Water Used: Top Water Maximum Bade Pressure, PSI: 68.2 Hydraulic Gradient 8.6 Effective Stress PSIminimax ; 4.6015.90 Initial Degree of Saturation, °%: 73.6 Final D ree of Saturation, W 103.5 " Specific Gravity = 2.55 (est.) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability Q 200C (6&): k..,, = 3.8 x 104 cm/sec Specification: 10 cm/ sec or less Test results comply with specificiations. 0-5,000 cubic yard sample ✓ R rt Reviewed B ' MAP V-" * ()L�✓ jps t -M F—tzux c9 92 FROM : HCC A T C PHONE NO. : 9147628860 Jun. 09 1998 12:44PM P8 Advance Testing Company, Inc. 0 22 Sarah Walls Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 11 Report of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure 11 Client: Hudson Canyon Consfructidn Project: Castle Poiret Lanall Source: S. Dutchess Sand & Gravel. L864: 98-0273 Item: 3.01 Clay Barrier Layer ATC'Project M 970210 Date Sampled: 5129198 Date Tested: s129-11198 Sam led B M. Meyer Tested B M. Creeden Sa le Into tion Field Number: #1 Received Sample Lent in.: 6-1 S imen Prepared From Section: 1.0 to 5.9 inches 8elcW_Tqp of Sam li Description: Light brown silty fine sand vAth traces clay, little gravel .rest Sample. Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 12.44 12.22 Diameter, crn: 7.12 7,17 Moisture Content %: 11.81 19.40 Dry Density, PCF; 107,92 108.34 Permeabil Test Conditions T of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure PSi: 68.1 Hydraulic Gradient: 147 Effective Stress PSI (minimax): 3.6116.20 Initial De gree at Saturation, %: " 58.7 Final D ree of Saturation, %: * 97.6 Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability Q 2eG (WF): kxo = 2.3 x 1 e cmisec Specification: k20 = 10'S crnisee or less Sample. complies with specification. �r Report Reviewed Bim__ --� N1�-P I N51TLA F-tsW CDMPi°tCT100 <P- * G Ib PHONE NO. : 9147628963 .r Jun. 09 1998 12:44PM P9 4V -;y Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail * Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) A96-1600 of Triaxial Test Using Back Pressure Client: Hudson Can on Construction Project: Castle Poiret Landfill Source: Southern Dutchess Sand & Gravel Lab #: � 98-0283 Item: 3.01 Clay Barrier Layer-', : ATC ro'ect #: 970210 Date Sam led: , 611/98 Date Tested: 612-4/98 ISamp led B D. Vellone Tested B M. Creeden Notes: Sample information Field Number. 2 Received Sample Length in.: 6.3 $ ecimen Prepared From Section: 0.4 to 5,4 inches Maw L02 Of Sampie Description_ Light brown silty fine sand with traces clay, little gravel, trace fine voids Test Sample Dinio ions. Before Test After Test Height, cm; 12.74 11.87 Diameter, cm: 7.12 7,45 Moisture Content %. 13.10 16.07 D Densi , PGF; 1 116.61 114.34 Permm�m abil Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure PSI: 67.9 Hydraulic Gradient; 16.4 Effective Stress, PSI mirUmax : 31516. 11 Initial Degree of Saturation, %: 82,9 Final Degree of Saturation,.* " 96.3 " Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of permeability @ 20°C (6&F): k= = 4.6 x 1 e cm/sec Specification: k2O = 10-5 cxNsee or less Sample complies with specification. iAJ S rrLA Fl ELD Cx.*tFO,v--Tlo'v 1.4 o6/ 10.'98 WED 06:39 FAI 1961398 ADV?,NCETESTING 00.9 Advance Te'sting, ,Company,.Inc. T " ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail -"Campbell Hall, NY'10916 •-(914) 496-1600 Report of Triaxial.Pearmeability'Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM -D5084 -- Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Pi'o'ect: ' "; Castle Point Landfill Item:. 3.01 Cls Barrier ATC Pr 6C #: 97021 is Source: Date Sampled- On -Site 1st lift 612!98 ATC„irab #: �DatO To 98-0292 618198 dam led B C. Devlin Tested B :. M. ,Creeden Sam le Information Field, Number. Lift #1, Acre 43' Received Sample Length in.: Shelb Tulse Specimen- Pre ared From Section: 0:5” to 4.9" Below'To of Sam le Description: "' Light brown silty brown sand with traces . cls little ravel, trace fine voids. Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 11.46 10'.63 Diameter; .cm: 7.12 .. 7,23. Moisture Content, %: 16.65 17.11 .. Dry Density, PCF: - 112.47 -1117-53 Permeabiii Test Candltions Type,of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum "Back Pressure; PSI: 68.1 Hydraulic Gradient: l Effective Stress, PSI (minimax):. Initial De -gree of Saturation, %: 93.7 Final Degree of Saturatibn; %: 105.0.1...' A T Client: Source: Item: Date Sampled: Sampled BV: Advande Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail + Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-16oO of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure Ison CaD= construction Project: Castie P Ahem Dutchess Sand & Gravel Cab #: 98-0285 1 Clay Barrier LLw, ATC Project #: 970210 M . Date Tested: 6/2.4198 Unllnnc - Tested BV: M. Cree+ Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test lief ht, cm: 9120 10,65 Diameter, cm: 7.16 7.37 Moisture Content %. 15.46 15.95 Ury Densi , PCF: 116.07 115.08 Permeability Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI: 67.5 Hydraulic Gradient: 21.0 Effective Stress, PSI mirilmax : 2.7516.08 Initial Degree cf Saturation, 96.3 Final Degree of Saturation 96: 96.6 * Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of permeability (Q 2000 (SeF): km = 2.6 x 104 cm/sec Specification: k. = 1 e crrdsee or less Notes: Sarnpla complies with specification. 06/16/98 TUE 12:43 F.A.X 4961398 ADVANCETESTING X1007 A T Advance Testing Company', Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Weiis Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916-(914)496-1600- Fax (914) 495-1398 Report of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM CJS 84 Client: Hudson Can on Construc,tior) . Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barrier ,4TC to'eCt #J!': 98-0299 Source; On-site Second Lift ATC Lab #: 970210 Date Sampled., 614198 Date Tested: 6/5198 Sam led By. B. Schutz Tested S . M. Creeden Sample lnformation Field Number. Lift #2 Acre #1 Received Sample -Length (in.: Sheibx Tube Specimen Prepared From Section: 1.58" to 7.01" Below Top of Sam le Description: Light brown clayey silty sand Test Sample Dimensions Before Test /after Test Height, cm: 13.37 13.02 Diameter, cm: 7.22 7.21 Moisture Content, W 13.88 14,45 Dry Density, PCF; 114..67 117.96 Permeability Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI. 70.93 Hydraulic Gradient: 7.0 Effective Stress, PSI rninimax : 2;75/5.71 Initial Degree of Saturation, %; 82.9 Final Degree of Saturation, %: 95,2 * Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability 6 20°G (580P): k2o = 3.8 x 10-6 e171lsec Specification: k20 w 1.0 x 10'5 cm/sec; or less Comments: Sample complies with specification Resort Reviewed By, iNStTK F��D CO+APA(--T Ick C49 91 M'16 '98 TUE 12:42 FAX 4961398 ADF9NCETESTING X1005 ,T„ Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail * Campt•iel! Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 rt of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: C -lay Barrier ATC Project #: 970210 Source: On-site ATC Lab #: 98-0303 Date Sampled: 6/5198 Date Tested: 618198 Sam Fed B D, vellone ITested B M. Creeden Sam le Information Field Number, Lift #2 Acre #2 Received Sample Length (in.): 7.126 Specimen Prepared From Section: 0.5" to 6.2" Below Top of Sample Description: tight brown clayey silty sand Test Sample Dimensions Before Test Alter Test Height, cm: 13.48 '11.82 Diameter, cm: 7.17 7.49 Moisture Content %: 13.63 15.91 Dry Density, PCF: 109.61 114,77 Permeabili Test Conditions Type of Water Used: - _ Top Water _ Maximum Back Pressure, PSI: _ 68.3 Hydraulic Gradient: 15.88 Effective Stress, PS! (minimax): 2.62/6.48 Initial Degree of Saturation, %: 713 Final Degree of Saturation, W * 95.6 ` Specific Gravity = 2.65(estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability Q 200C (680F): kZo = 6-5 x 10-7 cm/sec Specification: k2o = 1.0 x 10-$cmisec or less Comments: Sample complies with specification, Report Reviewed By: C�G� NO l NS tT(A Ft ELID C(>MpprcT tom @ -4�- c 5r 5; qa 06,'16%98 TUE 12:43 F.kI 4961398 ADVANCETESTING dons.....__. A T Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail + Campbell Hail, IVY 10916 a (914) 496-1600 IF Report of Triaxial Pearmeabill Test UsingBack Pressure Test Method: ASTM 05084 Client: Hudson Canvon Construction Pro ect: Castle paint landfill Item: Clay Barrier Layer µ ATC Project # 970210 Source: On-site ATC -Cab #: 98-0308 Date Sampled: 6/8198 Date Tested: Btrwm Sam led B 8, Schutz ITested By, IM, Creeden Sam ie Information Field Number. Lift#2 Acre #3 Tube Received Sample Length in.: 6.9" Specimen Prepared From Section: 1.13" to 5,62" Below 7op of Sample Description: Light brown clayey silty sand Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 12.70 11.38 Diameter, cm: 7.21 7.40 Moisture Content, %: 13.01 15.77 Dry Density, PCF: 109.00 115.47 Permeabil' Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI: 68.52 Hydraulic Gradient: 18.75 Effective Stress, PSI (min/max): .9314.23 Initial Degree of Saturation', %: • * 66.5 Final D22ree of Saturation %fl: * 96.6 -Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 20'C (680F): ken = 6.1 x 1 e crrilsec Specification: kZo = 1.0 x 10'5 crtllsee or less Comments: Sample complies with specification. Report Reviewed { �y jrJsITLA F1E�.D c�M PAr—T' Y -) A-) @ C70 9-1 06/16/98 TUE 12:42 FA.Y 4961398 ADVANCETESTING iih006 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10816.1914) 496-1600 rt of Triaxial Pearmeabifity Test Using Back Pressure Test Method• Ag"rm dn5nAA Permeabil "fest Conditions TYpe of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI: 68.24 Hydraulic Gradient: 18.71 Effective Stress, PSI (min/max): 1.8514,60 Initial Deqree of Saturation, %: 63.1 Final De ree of Saturation %. " 109.7 Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 20°C (63°F): k2G = 3.5 x 1 e cm/st!c Specification: k2o = 1.0 x 10-5 cm/se-c or less Comments: Sample complies with specification, IJU ��1,U�;70 i6�G 1•f. r`! JC'.'f.i -FUV iJ.O :111 rl7.:v\,G1G.711lY1a A�:d�a.n„ce Test l n Co;rri an,, ibeU �HaIL;�NY 1�fJ97 G � + iility::Test Usin4?E I; ASTM E�5084��. a I , Ghent:: ”' Ht,dso�'Can on.Constructiorl Plnv eCt::'°::::•,::' : �':: castle Poinf'l.andfill Item: • •::: Cla '':Ramer ATC.--Pto'a #�' '002x4 Source: ..SiteLift #3 Acre #1 M : ATC`'.Lal,'#� .' 0319 Date:'Sam lad. 618198' Dada:>fiasted Sam ied B ,: D.'Velione . Tested ''- 'i. C: L3 vlin ...Sari le I br nation , ; Field. -Moi b4r,��ft #3 Rcr #1'Shelby Tube Received ;Sam leten ttt` in. , 7. -S ecimen'.'P.re ared'From-Secton 0 333"..to'5,9'12 ::Below .fox of Sam le Description tight 3 mwn Clayey SiltyZor' :, :... . Test Sample- Dimensions ';. Before Test•: Afiter Test HeE ht;:crn 14.45. Diametee;,cm T15 tUrei Gorjtent','io/a Mois . ;1'3 10 ;14:40 .. [,1:21.22.:; Perme abili Test 'Con'tliticns . T Used, ouWater Use ;T Maximum"Sack Pres'sum. PSL drawl We Gradient: Etfective::Stress;:PSC minimax~. .:269'1::602" l Iniiiai:De rse�of;Saturaiion, °Io : ,*' •... 8 '•.:5 ; ; :.: :: Final"D'e tee;afSaturation; %o.': * SpGfic Gravity ;`2 65 (est,rnated}� •.. :Its ' �,. . .. ermea i ies . esc� Test 56 """'76stmethodA -D Test 56 .Soil": c4od��:,brpkbriJcho axIm Oct TT 8-0 Pate'Sampled, am -t6h Utz Test 56 .Soil": c4od��:,brpkbriJcho axIm 59, Test 56 .Soil": c4od��:,brpkbriJcho 59, Test 56 59, - 2004 �nc. 0 of's Pi I..........'�.I.....,..rl.'',..,,.�.�.:..�,;..,...', "..'.'!D D'6n§Lty.;IRCRI 114:27;: T MaxilT. C{ertt Ud .. .. Ic c Ste) (ht':Landfill .; Item : Cla `8ari•�er:. : ATC,:Pro ectiA ReceiVed Sah)p le Len th 9721'0, S:ource:..:::::;. Descnption L�gt�t f;rtivun fine santl w�thr;silit and clay Date, Sam ied : 671:9198 am' Wd B.' •,,.. :, ;. „,, Tested B :. S B. sc'hutz A•. x e .. :.: i'Sam ie',lrffbrm'ation Field,Number,;::.:.; ,.•.., , rift'#3 Acre: Ci. ReceiVed Sah)p le Len th -S p0bimen:P.re 'ared�Frorri,Sectiori;;: .:0.6x6"#0.6:033" ;';` Belav+rTo o Sam �e Descnption L�gt�t f;rtivun fine santl w�thr;silit and clay Test: Sam le:Dimenaioris :.:: .8efore Test )After Test :Mei ht, crus :3,91 .12:95 Diarrieter;::cm: 7_p.7 ;::. .;,„ '721 Moisture Canterit.,%; < 12c70 145OZ7.77 D :Densi PCRLI 1r1;$:7 4 t G .. P.ermealbil i TeSt;Corrditii,ns�' I` T ebfWziter::Used..:': :'Ta Watery. Maximum. Bair, k;')?'ressure-, PSL' H draulic.Gradiant EffectiVe Si-esEi PSI ..3,x'2 L 6.x;'1 I� .:. mm/max , inibieL.De ree:o#Saturation, >;ina .-D ree of'Saturation, °/b' lity:Test'Results: Test' Sim Ie D�m'enelons Before Tes# i�►fter`Test :: Hei �"ht,'cmi2Q8 1'i28 oistr Content %1 13.5' 1 16 !I 9 D.:Dens117:07. �..; Permogibi Test'.Con+ditlons Type. bf::Wafer.lJsed Ta .:Mteril :Eulaicimram`Sacit:Pressure, PSI:. ::6&5s; 77, EffectiveStress;'. PSI:' :rriiNr�afic �:271'6i9� I� lnitiafDe ree�of:Saturai�ora :%: .: ' .'-79 ,�:.� Final Deg ree nf5aturation; %;', * 1 D3:8' A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hap, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 - Fax (914) 496-1398 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill TEST EQUIP: Gauge No. 8 DATE: 06/19/98 ! WEATHER. Sunny REPORT: 97-0210-14 Technician S. Schutz Test Soil Max Water In Place Compact Code Test Location No Date Depth 1 Elev No DryDen Cont Dry Den. (%) 1 6119 6" -1st lift 1 114.1 13:8 115.2 100+ 1A Special project ciavliner extension Area 1, lift 1 S 2 6119 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 15.2 111.8 98.0 1A Special project Gayiiner extension Area 1, lift 2 3 6119 6" -3rd lift 1 114.1 16.1 109.6 96.1 1A Special project Gayiineextension e 1, lift 3 C.{ 4 6119 6" -3rd lift 1 114.1 13.2 114.8 100 + IA Lift 3 Acre 4 (shelby) c; 5 6119 6" -3rd lift 1 114.1 14,7 112,6 98.7 1A Lift 3 Acre 3 (shelby) C— P 4 („ IMPORTANT NOTES Representatives of Hudson Canyon were present and aware of test results. All densities reported as pounds per cubic foot Compacoon % is based on maximum dry density obtained on sample indicated by 5011 ID number R . fully submitted. ADVANCE M17NG Co. 'CODES 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) Test Results Comply 3) BASE COURSE B) Recompaction Required 4) SUBBASE C) Ager Recompaction 3) SOIL CEMENT' 6) ion SECTION 6: CHANGE ORDER NO. 3: ADDITIONAL CAP AREA - CLAY LAYER CHANGE ORDER NO. 3: ADDITIONAL CAP AREA - BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER CHANGE ORDER #3: ADDITIONAL CAP AREA - CLAY ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA I FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #1 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 1.7x10 107 PASS P18/ cm/sec C122 -5 -6 TRIAXIAL PERMEABILITY TEST #2 D5084 1.0x10 cm/sec 1.4x10 108 PASS P19/ cm/sec 135 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,12-16± 100%, 109 PASS C120 CONTENT #1 D3017 16.0 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,12-16 97.3%, 109 PASS C121 CONTENT #2 D3017 15.3 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90°x6, 12-16± 94.9%, 109 PASS C1221 CONTENT #3 D3017 16.1 P18 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,12-16± 95.7%, 109 PASS C123 CONTENT #4 D3017 14.9 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,12-16 ± 94.4%, 109 PASS C124 CONTENT 95 03017 15.8 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16 ± 93.0%, 109 PASS C125 CONTENT #6 D3017 16.0 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 100%, 110 PASS 0126 CONTENT #7 D3017 13.8 INSITU COMPACTION : MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 98.0% 110 PASS C127 CONTENT #8 D3017 15.2 INSITU COMPACTION : MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 96.1% 110 PASS C128 CONTENT #9 D3017 16.1 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 100%, 311 PASS C129 CONTENT #10 D3017 12.2 INSITU COMPACTION : MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16 ± 100%, 1 1 1 PASS C130 CONTENT #11 D3017 12.1 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 100%, 111 PASS C131 CONTENT #12 D3017 12.2 INSITU COMPACTION : MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 94.0%, 111 PASS C132 CONTENT #13 D3017 13.5 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 100%, 111 PASS 0133 CONTENT #14 D3017 12.4 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D29221 90%, 12-16± 100%, 111 PASS C134 CONTENT #15 D3017 12.1 INSITU COMPACTION : MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 98.4%, 111 PASS C1351 CONTENT #16 D3017 13.3 P19 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 100%, 111 PASS C136 CONTENT #17 D3017 12.2 INSITU COMPACTION: MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 12-16± 100%, 111 PASS C137 CONTENT #18 D3017 12.1 CHANGE ORDER #3: ADDITIONAL CAP AREA - BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA 1 FAIL. KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. PARTICLE SIZE #1 D422 WITHIN LIMITS SEE SHEET 113 PASS NIA NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT #1 D2216 NIA 8.4% 114 PASS NIA MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 127.6 Ib1cf 115 PASS NIA OPTIMUM MOISTURE #1 @ 10.0% INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE 029221 90%, 8-12± 93.5%, ill PASS* Bpi CONTENT #1 D3019 12.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE 029221 90%,8-12± 93.1%, ill PASS* BP2 CONTENT #2 D3019 94.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%, 8-12± 90.1%, Ill PASS* BP3 CONTENT #3 D3019 14.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%, 8-12± 93.3%, 111 PASS* BP4 CONTENT #4 D3019 12.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%, 8-12 t 91.6%, ill PASS* BP5 CONTENT #5 D3019 14.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%, 8-12t 93.7%, 112 PASS BPB CONTENT #6 D3019 8.7 THESE MOISTURES WERE SLIGHTLY HIGHER THEN OPTIMUM AT TIME OF TESTING, HOWEVER THE COMPACTION WAS STILL ACCEPTABLE. A Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Report of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM D5084 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clav Barrier ATC Project #: 970210 Source: On Site ATC Lab #: 98-•0357 SP Date Sampled: 6118!98 Date Tested: 6123198 ,[Sampled By. 113. Schutz ITested B A. K e Sam le Information Field Number. Liner Extension Area 1, Lift 2 Received Sample Length in.: 7.82 Specimen Prepared From Section: 0.872 to 6.396 inches Below Top of Sam le Description: Light brown fine sand with silt and c1.3y. Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test Hei ht, cm: 13.15 12.16 Diameter, cm: 7.45 7.60 Moisture Content, %: 15.90 14.70 Dry Density, PCF: 116.20 120.7E Penneabili Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Hack Pressure, PSI: 68.2 Hydraulic Gradient: 15.1 Effective Stress, PSI (min/max): 2.9915.49 Initial Degree of Saturation, %: 99.4 Final Degree of Saturation, %: 105.3 " Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 200C (680F): k20 = 1.7 x 10-6 cm/sec Specification: k20 = 10-5 cm/sec or less Note: Test result complies with specification. Re ort Reviewed B ( P J�JS tTL-A -� E. c -.D GOtit PACTtcI-) C G ( 'Z -7- 1 o-7 10-7 0 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Report of Triaxial Pearmeability Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM 05084 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barrier ATC Project #: 970210 Source: Lift #3 Area #2 (Special Project ATC Lab #: 98-0390 SP Date Sampled: 6x16/98 Date Tested: 6/29198 Sam led By. B. Schutz Tested EX:. C. Devlin Sam le infomation Field Number: Lift #3 Area #2 ofSlpecial Project Received Sample Len in.: 5.96 Specimen Prepared f=rom Section: 5.500" to 5.961" Below Top of Sample Description: Brown silty soil with gravel Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 13.78 12.16 Diameter, cm: 7.21 7.50 Moisture Content, W 14.30 13.20 DEX Density, PCP: 113.28 1 118.64 Permeab111 Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Ta Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSi: 67.9 Hydraulic Gradient: 13.62 Effective Stress, PSI (min/max): 3.0615.86 Initial Degree of Saturation, %: ` 82.28 Final Degree of Saturation, W * 88.65 ' Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 2D°C (SrF): Specification: Comment: Sample complies with specification. k2a = 1.4 x 1 e cm/sec km = 1.0 x 10'5 cm/sec or less Report Re rt Reviewed By- JOB A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 - Fax (914) 496-1398 REPORT OF FISLD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction TEST EQUIP: Gauge No. 8 WEATHER: Partly Cloudy 70 F PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill DATE: 06/18198 REPORT: 97-0290- 13 Technician B. Schutz IMPORTANT NOTES Representative of Hudson Canyon Construction, Frank, was present and aware of test results. I ;END All d -ides reporter! as pounds per cubic foot Comp V. is based cn maximum dry density Respectfully submitted ADVANCE TESTING Co. _- 'CODES O 1) FILL MATERIAL 111 2) BACKFILL A) Test Results Comply 3) BASE COURSE a) Recompaction Required 4) SUBBASE C) Affer Recompaction s) SOIL CEMENT 5) HAP Test SON Max Water In Place Compact Coda Test Location No Date Depth 1 Elev No Dry Den Cont Dry Den. N 1 6118 6" -1st lift 1 114.1 16.0 114.1 100.0 1A Clay lift extension 7st half, lift 1 C(L6 2 6118 4" -1 st lift 1 114.1 15.3 111.3 97,3 1A Clay lift extension 'st half, lift 1 C -t?- l 3 6118 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 16.1 108.2 94.9 1A Clay lift extension ^st half, lift 2 (shelby) G[ZZ� P Is 4 6/18 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 14.9 109.1 95.7 1A Clay iift extension I st half, lift 2 C- I Z.3 5 6/18 6" -3rd lift 1 114.1 15.8 107,6 94,4 1A Clay lift extension -st half, lift 3 c lZA 6 6/18 6" -ani lift 1 114.1 16.0 106.1 93.0 1A Clay lift extension Ist half, lift 3 C lZS Location: See contractor drawings for exact locations Legend IMPORTANT NOTES Representative of Hudson Canyon Construction, Frank, was present and aware of test results. I ;END All d -ides reporter! as pounds per cubic foot Comp V. is based cn maximum dry density Respectfully submitted ADVANCE TESTING Co. _- 'CODES O 1) FILL MATERIAL 111 2) BACKFILL A) Test Results Comply 3) BASE COURSE a) Recompaction Required 4) SUBBASE C) Affer Recompaction s) SOIL CEMENT 5) Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Weils Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • {914) 496-1600 • Fax (9 14) 496-1398 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction TEST EQUIP* Gauge No. 8 WEATHER: Sunny Test No Date Depth 1 Elev PROJECT: Castle Point landfill DATE: 06/19/98 REPORT: 97-0210- 14 Technician B. Schutz SOH Max WaW In Place Compact Code teat Location 4 No Dry Den Cort Dry Den. (%) • 1 6119 6" -1 st lift 1 114,1 13.8 115.2 100 + 1A Special project ctay0ner extension Area 1, lift 1 C M2 - 2 6119 6" -2nd lift 1 114.1 15.2 111.8 98.0 1A Special project clayiiner extension Area 1, lift 2 GlZ'j 3 6119 6" -3rd lift 1 114.1 16.1 109.6 96.1 1A Special project ctayiiner extension Areal, lift 3 Gt'7$ 4 6119 5 6119 6" 6" 3rd lift -3rd lift 1 1 114,1 114.1 13.2 14.7 114.8 112.6 100+ 98.7 1A 1A Lift 3Acre 4 (shelby) Lift 3 Acre 3 (shelby) L�-I��C11 a j (q IMPORTANT NOTES Representatives of Hudson Canyon were present and aware of test results. t .M All densides report as pounds per cubic foot Comp( v % is based on maximum dry density obtairl�k- on sample indicated by soil 11) number Respectfully submitted; ADVANCE TES77NG Co. `CODES 110 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) Test Results Comply 3) BASE COURSE B) Recompactlon Required 4) SUBBASE C) Atter Recompacdon S) SOIL CEWENT 6) FROM :. HCC PHONE NO. : 9147628663 Jul. 13 1998 05:44PM P8 Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction 'PEST EQUIP: Gauge No. 9 WEATHER- Hazy ,.* Soil Mw wst4r In Place Depth f Elev No Dry Den Cont Dry Den. PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill $P DATE: 08124Y9f3 REPORT.' 97-0210- 15 Technician S• Schutz 6" -lift 1 1 114.1 12.2 1189 6" -lift 1 1 114.1 12.1 119,4 6" -lift 1 1 114.1 112 117.8 5" -lift 2 1 114.1 13.5 107.2 6" - lift 2 1 114,1 12.4 118.7 V -lift 2 1 114.1 12.1 119.4 s" -IM 3 1 114.1 13.3 112.2 6' -lift 3 1 114.1 12.2 119.2 6" lift 3 1 1141 12.1 118.4 17' BP lift 10 127.0 12.7 119.3 12" -BP lift 10 127.6 14.9 118.8 12" • 817 lift 10 127.6 14.0 115.0 6" -BP lilt 10 127.6 12.4 110.0 6" -BP lift 10 127.6 14.1 117.0 Legend Note; Clay linef material appearasd to be slightly different than previously. Higher proctor iS 8 posy bility for the high DD values, IMPORTANT NOTES Repras� les of Hudson Canyon Construction were present and aware of test results. LEGEND All dwsitfes tapoMd as pounds per cubic foot Compaction K is based on maximarrt dry density obdrinf ., sample indicated by soul JD number RespeCf uslysubmitted ADVANCE rrES"NG Co. *CODES 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) TOO Results Car"Ply 3) BASE COARSE a) Recompactloo R"arired 4)SUBBASE C) After RecamPROft" 3) SOIL CEMANT 6) 10W Code Tara Location 100 + 1A lift 1, Ansa 2 c-- C Z9 100+ 1A lift 1, Area 2 c.130 100+ 1 A lift 1. Area 2 G i 31 54.0 1 A lift 2, Area 2 c t 3Z 100+ 1A lift 2, Area 2 G 133 100+ 98.4 1A 1A lift 2. Area 2 Cr 34 li$3, Area 2 (shelby) 100+ IA irft 3,Area 2 c ► % 100+ 1A lift 3, Area 2 C-(31 93.5 1A Special Project Area 1 93.1 1A Special PF*Ct Area 1 (3PZ 90.1 1A Special ProjectAfft 1 b P3 93.3 1A Special Project Area 1 615 91.6 1A Spacial Project Arae 1 Legend Note; Clay linef material appearasd to be slightly different than previously. Higher proctor iS 8 posy bility for the high DD values, IMPORTANT NOTES Repras� les of Hudson Canyon Construction were present and aware of test results. LEGEND All dwsitfes tapoMd as pounds per cubic foot Compaction K is based on maximarrt dry density obdrinf ., sample indicated by soul JD number RespeCf uslysubmitted ADVANCE rrES"NG Co. *CODES 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) TOO Results Car"Ply 3) BASE COARSE a) Recompactloo R"arired 4)SUBBASE C) After RecamPROft" 3) SOIL CEMANT 6) POM HCC PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Jul. 29 1998 05:02PM P4 Advance Testing Company., Inc, C■ 22 Sarah Weiss Trail a Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 (��+' REPORT OF FISLO COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Constn=ian PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill SP TEST EQUIP; Gauge No, 1 GATE: 07107198 WEATHER: Cloudy, Sprinkles 7585 F. REPORT: 97-0210- 18 Technician 0. Schutz st Soil Max Water In Place COmpact Cede JC t✓� o Date Depth I Slay No Dry Den Cont Dry Don. (No) Test Location � 1 717 6" I at lift 6 11619 13.9 108.4 92,7 1A Lift 1, Acre 1 Barrier protection S F� 2 717 70 6" 6" 1st lift lift 8 8 116.9 92,1 116.9 100.0 100+ 1A Litt 1, Acre 1 Barrier protection � 1 3 -1st 116.9 10,8 118.0 1A Lift 1, Acre 1 Barrier protection 4 717 8" - i st lift 8 116.9 15.0 111.2 55.1 1A Lift 1, Acre 1 Barrier protection 5 717 6" -1 at lift a 116.9 12,7 113.2 96.8 1A Lift 1., Acre 1 Barrier protection 'Lift 6 717 a" 1st lift 8 116.9 12.9 115.2 98.5 1A 1, Acre 9 Barrier protection � .7 _ +� 6107 7 717 8" -1 at lift $ 116,9 1318 '111.8 95.6 1A Lift 1, Acre 1 Barrier protection 8 717 12" -1 st Wt 8 116.9 8.7 110.7 93.7 1 A Sptoai Project Area 2 6 P (p .pend IMPORTANT NOTES snk of Hudson Canyon Construction was present and awafe of test results, LEGEND All densf-'" reported as pounds per cubic foot smpactit. 4 based on maximum dry density titained orf sample indicated by Soil 10 number !espeotlull y submitted ',OVANCE TES77N('7 Co. JUL 20 `CODES 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) Test RssuUv Camply 3) MASE COURSE B) Rdwampaction Raquimd 4) SUaaASP C) Altar Recampacdon 5) SOIL CEMENT 6) i A T Advance Testing Company, Inc. � ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill - SP Item: Barrier Protection ATC Project #: 970210 Source: On-site ATC Lab No.: 98-0361 SP Date Sampled: 6/19/98 Sampled By: B. Schutz Date Tested: 6/23/98 Tested B . A. Kyte. t GRADATION SIEVE ANALYSIS OF SOIL OR AGGREGATE Test Method(s): ASTM D422 C136C117• AAS HTO T11 T27 T88 ATC Lab # Sam le Type Sampling Location Specification 98-0361 SP I Barrier Protection I In -Place Proi. Sec. 4.01.2.01 B ATC Lab # ()R-8361 SP Sieve Size Metric U.S. % Retain. % Passin % Pass Spec. 100 mm 4.0" 0.0 100.0 100 75.0 mm 3.0" 0.0 100.0 50.0 mm 2.0" 0.0 1 100.0 37.5 mm 1.5" 3.0 97.0 25.0 mm 1.0" 2.7 94.3 19.0 mm 3/4" 1.6 92.7 12.5 mm 1/2" 3.1 89.6 6.30 mm 1/4" 1 6.3 83.3 30-65 4.75 mm #4 2.9 8 0. 5 2.00 mm #10 11.3 69.2 .850 mm #20 10.9 58.2 .600 mm 930 4.9 53.3 .425 mm #40 6.3 47.0 0-40 .180 mm 480 11.1 35.9 075 mm #200 6.3 29.6 Pan 29.6 0.0 Comments: Minus #200 by wash -sieve method. Report Reviewed By: Lyrt. A. T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. JUL. y 7 ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 486-1398 Report of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 - 92 Client: Hudson Can on Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill SP Item: Barrier Protection Project #: 970210 Source: On-site ATC Lab #: 98-0361 SR Date Sampled: 6/19198 Sampled B : B. Schutz Date Tested: 6123198 ITested By: A. Kyle ATC Lab No.: 98-0361 Wet Weight (q): 378.7 Dry Weight (g): 349.3 % Nat. Moisture: 8.4 Report Reviewed By: Log 114 A r T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 - Fax (914) 496-1398 11 REPORT OF MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction ATC PROJECT NO.: 970210 PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NUMBER: 98-0361 SP TEST METHOD:' ASTM 698 'Standard' Method: C SOIL ID NUMBER: 10 ITEM: Barrier Protection SOURCE: On -Site SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown silt sand with gravel DATE SAMPLED: 6119198 1 ISAMPLED BY: B. Schutz DATE TESTED: 6123/98 1 ITESTED BY: K. Johnson 126.0 8 O 124.0 2z U Moisture Density Relationship G 118.0 116.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 Moisture Content, Percent of Dry Weight Individual Test Points Percent Moisture Dry Density 7.0 120.0 8.4 122.6 10.7 125.3 12.4 ( 13.9 122.8 117.6 Test Maximum Dry Density: Test Optimum Moisture Content: Percent Oversize Particles: Specific Gravity of Oversize: Corrected Maximum Dry Density Corrected Opt. Moisture Content: -�--Series! •.•• Zero Air Voids 125.4 Ibicu. ft. 10.7 % 7.3 % 2.64 127.6 Ib/cu. ft. 10.0 % 1157 6125198 Report Reviewed by: 1'1• SECTION 7: BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION (SOURCE - .WEST HOOK SAND & GRAVEL) SOURCE: WEST HOOK SAND & GRAVEL BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER: PRE -CONSTRUCTION QUALIFICATION ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA ! FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. PARTICLE SIZE #1 C136 WITHIN LIMITS SEE SHEET 116 N/A PARTICLE SIZE #2 C136 WITHIN LIMITS SEE SHEET 116 r N/A PARTICLE SIZE #3 C136 WITHIN LIMITS SEE SHEET 116 N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #1 D4318 WITHIN LIMITS P.1 = 6 117 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #2 D4318 WITHIN LIMITS p 1 = 8 118 PASS N/A ATTERBERG LIMITS #3 D4318 WITHIN LIMITS p,;. = 9 1 1 g PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 1 D2216 N/A 16.1% 120 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 2 D2216 N/A 17.5% 121 PASS N/A NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 3 D2216NIA 15.6% 122 PASS N/A MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 120.3 Ib/cf 123 PASS N/A OPTIMUM MOISTURE #1 @ 12.7% MXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 116.9 l b/cf @14,1% 124 PASS N/A OPTIMUM MOISTURE #2 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY @ D698 PROCTOR 119.4 Ib/cf 125 PASS N/A OPTIMUM MOISTURE #3 @13.1 % DIRECT SHEER TEST #1 D3080 N/A SEE SHEET 126 PASS N/A DIRECT SHEET TEST #2 D3080 N/A SEE SHEET 127 PASS N/A DIRECT SHEET TEST #3 D3080 N/A SEE SHEET 128 PASS N/A THE WEST HOOK MATERIAL WAS SLIGHTLY FINER THAN SPECIFIED, BUT WAS DEEMED TO BE ACCEPTABLE. NOTE: THIS PREQUALIFICATION SUPERCEDES SECTION 2 HEREIN. lw1m FAX 4961398 ADVANCETESTING Q10 0 2' r; Sieve Size :%.Rot. %'-pa:SS'd Comments ,` Minus #200,by:wash-r,.,,. Samplesan .98 �,9M3.36A .98 100.' W. 37.5:.Mm —A'O.'s :9&0:,- 1.9"1-0.',m. rh 3,14-!" 12-5m -1/2' 9T.0`: cy...M, 756`7::� 4�75,.M M- #4..: :2:5 84:.'3:.': 2.O 'mm #10.'.. TZ. .,.:77, I.- 6.6 --2.5:: 67,;'9 :425:MM 80'1. M.'m #200 6'. 0, '- 53.1: 53:4,' Comments ,` Minus #200,by:wash-r,.,,. Samplesan .98 �,9M3.36A .98 Oei:9/98 10:09 F4.I 91449611-25 Amoa TESTI;PG A ino Com anInc.' � T Advance Test g p y, Inc Q003 ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hap, NY 10916 -(914) 496-1800 - Fax (914) 496-1398 loot: Hudson CanYon CTW—=c b'Gn PM11cor Castle Point LaedfiI l ltean: 8urier Frotecdon Pro act #: 9702I4 oares: West Hook Saad & Gravel eefiation: Proi. Sea 4.01,_ .0I 132 Im led: 6/12/95 Sam led Bv: E. Donso estcd: 6 Teo@A Br: C, Ferraad Report of Att=bcr- Limits Test Results Mtds 316.HM T•39 T•90 Report Revitura$ 8 : Gw. � III 06/20/98 10:14 F. 39a :LDVOCE TESTING X008 �, ' an' arc:' - .. :horn , ��7 C8 .es'ti r� • a�tl a ' : r 16 914 ? '1600 sx 9,14j 486. 398:. 22,sarah'WousTrail�Cart0*1.Halr, NY'109• ( ). `F ( 1 Ic VOW& daoaConstrurriaa lsro'ect: Calds PoiitjL;ar 1.rPrnrect on. Pxvfi: 970 1.0atHookSwd-&GraveL2l9& lw �J98 RzWft of AU=bwg L tits Test.Results f' Tees gjgtgL.,4 D431 Lab Num"beeo 98-0336B " Liquid Limit+ 21 I Pla rde LbWt.. . , 20 Plea Index: 8 f R rt Reviewed By. 48f28/98 10:13 FAX 9244981359 ,DYOCE TE9TING I Q0007 j Y 4-dvarrT. ■ 22 Salah WNIa7rail:� C�1�pbeil Hall, W*109-M (914) 498.1900 F= (914) 486.1398: c= . Haat: Hudson clmb=cnm Pro act: Castle ?olotL=dM, ra; Hamlet Protection Pro ect #�: 9.70214 : 11 Soma= • ' WtZKock'5and & Ciravel S tion: Pro'. Sea 4.01.3.01132 M: 6/.12138. ungded ' erted; G F �I ' • , Reviewed B 119 U T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 - (914) 496-1600 - Fax (914) 496-1398 _ Report of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 - 92 �� Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Barrier Protection Project #: 970290 Source: West Hook Sand $ Gravel ATC Lab #: 98-0336A Date Sampled: 6112198 Sampled Bj7E. Dentga Date Tested: 6123!98 ITested By: M. Creeden ATC Lab No.: 98-0336A Wet Weight 900.7 DEy Weight 775.6 % Nat. Moisture: 16.1 Report Reviewed B izo A Advance Testing vInc...'.... Compan , T ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Report of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM 02216 - 92 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Barrier Protection Project #: 970210 Source: West Hook Sand & Gravel ATC Lab #: 98-03368 Date Sampled: 6/12198 Sampied By: E. Dene a Date Tested: 6123198 ITested 8 M. Creeden ATC Lab No.: 98-0336B Wet Weight 692.4 Dry Weight 589.5 % Nat. Moisture: 17.5 Report Reviewed By: (z( 0 T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 - Fax (914) 496-1398 Report of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 - 92 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Barder Protection Project #: 970210 Source: West Hook Sand & Gravel ATC Lab #: 98-0336C Date Sampled: 6112198 Sampled By: E. Dene a Date Tested: 6!23198 Tested BY: M. Creeden 11 ATC Lab No.: 98-0336C Wet Weight_(_qy 824.4 Dry Weight 713.3 % Nat_ Moisture: 15.6 Report Reviewed By: � Izz. 06/26,196 101 12 F11 9144961395 1'E3TI}G ®004 A Advante Testing Company, Inc. T ■ 22 Sarah Wells Traii • Campbell Flail. NY 10916 * (914) 488-1800 - Fax (914) 498.1388 C RE PORT OF MOISTURE D RELATIONSHIP CLIENT: Hudson Canyon Construction ATC PROJECT NO.: 970210 PROJECT. Castle Point Landfill ATC LAB NUMBER: 98.0.3380 TEST METHOD: ASTM 698'Standard' Method: C SOIL ID NUMBER: 8 ITEM: Barrier Protection SOURCE: West Hook Sand & Gravel 5011. DESCRIPTION: Brown si sand with gravei DATE SAMPLED: &12A8 I I -SAMPLED BY: E. Dense a DATE TESTED: 6l22J9a I ITESTED BY- A. Kyle Moisture Density Relationship rte• Senesl -4--Zero AT Vdids 1,10.0 1110 12.0 13.Q R • 18.0 Y Individual T"t Points perewt Dry Test Maximum Dry ■_ Vai. ft oisture Density 7 -est Optimum Moisture Content: Percent Oversize Partides: Specific Gravity of Oversize: 1 Corrected Memmurn Dry Density Corrected Opt Moisture Corderrt 1-1 1 4.5 2.04 N/A N!A % % lb/cu. ft. % 11.5 113.0 i 2_ � 114.8 14.1 116.8 15.8 114.6 16.9 111.5 J 8123188 Report Reviewed by: �e- o Z4' 9 06/26/98 10:11 FAX q,144961398 OV,kNLCE TESTING Advance Testing Company, Inc, H^l 4`ar�i. Wane 7roil P'.tir,7ni'�111 wall MY 1601Bi MM 498-1600 w 01I Ittvtr wad 1ry�� tzy<E�.� - — 1 z40 ASL C Cam PROJECT PROJEL 1 CAX& POb ATC LAW N0, 98.336 TEST PERFORMED: TEST UMOD: ITOL. I Direct Shea Teat d Sal+ Under Comp Wmmd Drmod CaedM= ASTM D3080, g ' AW!r L43 -I 141Z"xiE A I 4,013zrricr PzotttwQA Lam SOL= West Heat Send did Gmva! DATE SAMPLM.- 6AV98 1 SAMM 7n BY- i Eric Dmop DAT -2 TESTED: I 6013198 TESTED BY. w 01I Ittvtr wad 1ry�� tzy<E�.� - — 1 z40 TEST NM'DMt: 1 2 3 NORMAL STRESS I44 238 576 MAX. SHEAR STFMS, sf 541 661 1045 HORTL_ DISPLACEMENT ATMAX SIMAR 0.233 0.387 1 0.395 PERCM1-, MojqTr.M4lagMAL 16.06 1 16.06 16.06 PERCENT MOISTUME, FINAL 15-28 15.22 i 1531 DRYDIIYSITY, PCF, D AL 107.46 10746 1 1071,4b DRY DENS=, PCF..AT TEST 107.88 108.20 108.4'3 TMMESS. ]ITCHES. WITLAL 4.092 4.092 4.092 THIC NESS.:NCIIES,ATT'EST 4.076 1 4.064 4.053 11 0 WA -M 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 pnelr rbttoar va. I+ivrrrtei Strres voracei vs Morizor" D"wphoov nwtt I 1200 O.Ot] 1 n. 1000 O.a5 SOD I 0.074 0.03 0.02 -0-2 0 IN i d 0.01 �4 pei N ra d o -0.02 5 ' a 100 240 300 400 300 900 ' INormtl Str om pot ; i Horiz Dts1 kcrows Now Stress vs. Dlspiscatotrrrrt ! f t200 � 1000 wo 10007 i 900 I tZ pei N 400 I zoo } a o az O.s a_s D.a 1 1 x I Mortmi til DlspWoarmA ar.Mo w 01I Ittvtr wad 1ry�� tzy<E�.� - — 1 z40 f� 08/26/98 11:35 FAX 9144961398 ADVANCE TESTIYG Advance TestIn9Company, Inc. T 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Camtlball Hall NY 1 nQt A + rQi d1 dQA-t Ann 1002 'PEST NL'NBER: FAdeon Cawlya Causbaotiaos MOM= Castle Poore LaadfM ATC LAB NO. I 98.33® TEST PERFORMED: D41a Shaer Teat a f soda Under Caoealidaoed Dre d Condi low TEST MEMOD: ASTM 1T09 U Hoeatr LCr114 U-xlZ" Ci'i` E 4.01 Heiser ft=ctim EgW SOURCE 'Wont Hods Sand and Ckwd DATE SAWLED: ! 6/17198 SA1+M,HD BY: Psic DATE TESTED i 6/Z4�5/98 TESTED BY CMY Oev}in 'PEST NL'NBER: 1 2 3 NORMAL STRESS, pt 144 299 576 MAX SHEAK STRESS, * 287 543 797 1.10=. DLSPLACEMIDa AT MAX. SHEAR 0.153 0.620 0.934 PERCENT CISTURF, IISMAL 15.66 i 11.66 15,66 PERC..�f I'MOISTURE FINAL 15.50 I 15.29 15.39 DRYDENSITY, PCF, Ii+11TIAL 10,837 I 108.27 10827 DRY De S1TY: PCFAT TEST 110.73 i 111.39 I 111.76 TMC&N MS, INCHES, a111TA►L 4.000 4.000 4.400 T OLN SS, INCHES, AT TESL 3.911 3.988 i 3.8T3 -T i a.o1 0.01 0.01 P.aik shawva. Normal MOM � ` Yeetkad Va. liorizondel zxspupoeeraun 1 a00te 4.000 I 800 0 ta 400 200 - I •�� 1 psi N -0A1S �4 psi N I 0 a -0.02. 0 1013 200 300 400 500 600 Normal Strras, I -0>zz0 Hoft GapL, inches Sbw fess vs. DieOmwent 900 � I 700 ! � I !! 600 f �� pN N 400 I _ I,�2 paf N #4 pal N 900 200 I I I ii I 100 -----T � a 0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.8 1 12 1.4 How t7•tapiecernGM lndiea IZI 013/'90/98 16;19 FAX 9144981198 ADVANCE TESTING X002/002 r ,r Advance Testing Company, Inc, ■ 22 Sarah Wehs Trail - Carrtobell Hall. NY 10918 + (91 4) 496-1600 nrn���av n�+wtrow �iT. 'i1rSi' NUA�l-I i'I'Cas a 3 doPottLwM NO, M -336C 'TESUED: � Direm 511r�r Teat df Sollr Under Caudidmed Drouw Cc�eaaiTOASTM IFT—ISMTW. D3080 LT ' Bo�an4.oa L G—I1412"x 12" AVMm 831 iA1 "TtwPtOw:dm; i 0.097 1 West Book Saeid mid Cruvd DA: 1 62IM L SAM P r !SY Efiepaup DED: ;t" TESTED BY: nrn���av n�+wtrow �iT. 'i1rSi' NUA�l-I 1 a 3 NORMAL MESS. pg �. Z8i 576 MAX MOLAR STRESS, p0 I 150 + 310 831 ROM DI PLACMMMM AT MAX SHAH. i 0.097 0.940 ! 7.741 PEACLNr MOIS'rM. MIAL 16-022 1&02 I 16M PERCENiMV=ME IFINAL 15.88 I5.97 i 15.77 DRY DENS IY PCF, INITIAL 103.21 105.21 i 103.21 ORYD13NS1TYPCF AS TEST ! 105.77 103.93 106.24 THICOMS.INCHES. 1NR7AL 4.000 5.000 a.Dao TIRCUMSS NC=l ATTEST 3,979 3.973 ,.• 'x.962 01W1633I 0.01 j OM O.OI P*sk sh"r vs. Nermw Berets j I Varthmi vs. Hroriaorrtsl Otapteomnmrt l000 j i � E=Isi NsiNsi N 8lm$46 i Harm Dlsal., inches Shaer Shit Vi. DlspUtwrA It C 0.2 0.4 0.2 CA 1 1.2 1.4 1.5. 1.3 Horonrai Dlaptaesmsnt, Inchm a mums poo Icad o=aed is to 1 pai N biaL Bared on 2 and 4 p¢ N trials, cabulon is 169 0 pL two is 1.184, o is 49.9dagrm& This rook is cocsisom the athu ptoje l dalafer this =&Le6aL ReviwwodIrr; 12b J. �. goo f I 104 j `t 400 3,00 m ji 2M i 0.02 a a x.01 j c3 0 0 100 200 300 400 !CC n0 I j -J,O1 E=Isi NsiNsi N 8lm$46 i Harm Dlsal., inches Shaer Shit Vi. DlspUtwrA It C 0.2 0.4 0.2 CA 1 1.2 1.4 1.5. 1.3 Horonrai Dlaptaesmsnt, Inchm a mums poo Icad o=aed is to 1 pai N biaL Bared on 2 and 4 p¢ N trials, cabulon is 169 0 pL two is 1.184, o is 49.9dagrm& This rook is cocsisom the athu ptoje l dalafer this =&Le6aL ReviwwodIrr; 12b SECTION S. INSITU BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER TEST TYPE ASTM METHOD ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA TEST RESULTS RESULT PAGE NO. PASS 1 FAIL MAP KEY # INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15± 92.7%, 129 PASS BP7 CONTENT #1 D3017 13.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,11-15± 100%, 129 PASS BP8 CONTENT #2 D3017 12.1 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15± 100%, 129 * BP9 CONTENT #3 D3017 10.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15 ± 95.1%, 129 PASS SP10 CONTENT #4 D3017 15.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15 ± 96.8%, 129 PASS BP1 1 CONTENT #5 D3017 12.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15± 98.5%, 129 PASS BP12 CONTENT #6 D3017 12.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15 ± 95.6%, 129 PASS BP13 CONTENT #7 D3017 13.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 11-15 ± 95.3%, 130 PASS BP14 CONTENT #8 D3017 12.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,11-15 ± 93.9%, 130 PASS BP15 CONTENT #9 D3017 13.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15± 100%, 130 PASS BP16 CONTENT #10 D3017 14.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15± 98.0%, 130 PASS BP17 CONTENT #11 D3017 13.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15± 100%, 130 PASS BP18 CONTENT #12 D3017 12.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922! 90%,11-15 ± 96.6%, 130 PASS BP19 CONTENT #13 D3017 13.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922f 90%,11-15 ± 100%, 131 * BP20 CONTENT #14 D3017 7.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,11-15 ± 96.4%, 131 * BP21 CONTENT #15 03017 9.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,11-15 ± 90.8%, 131 PASS BP22 CONTENT #16 D3017 11.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15 ± 97.3%, 131 PASS BP23 CONTENT # 17 D3017 12.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-1.5 ± 93.3%, 131 PASS BP24 CONTENT #18 D3017 14.7 mmm BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA 1 FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 90.3°X,, 131 PASS BP25 CONTENT #19 D3017 14.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 100%, 131 PASS BP26 CONTENT #20 D3017 12.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 96.2%, 131 "" BP27 CONTENT #21 D3017 15.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,11-15± 95.4%, 131 BP28 CONTENT #22 D3017 15.7 INSITU.COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 1 1-15 * 92.9%, 132 BP29 CONTENT #23 D3017 16.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE 029221 90%,11-15± 93.3%, 132 "' BP30 CONTENT #24 D3017 17.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15± 100%, 132 PASS BP31 CONTENT #25 D3017 13.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15± 100%, 132 PASS BP32 CONTENT #26 D3017 113 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15 ± 100%, 132 BP33 CONTENT #27 D3017 10.7 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15± 100%, 132 BP34 CONTENT #28 D3017 10.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%, 11-15± 98.3%, 132 PASS BP35 CONTENT #29 D3017 13.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 93.5%, 132 "" BP36 CONTENT #30 D3017 16.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15 ± 100%, 132 PASS BP37 CONTENT #31 D3017 13.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%, 11-15± 94.5%, 132 "" BP38 CONTENT #32 D3017 17.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 99.2%, 133 " BP39 CONTENT #33 D3017 8.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15± 98.2%, 133 PASS BP40 CONTENT #34 D3017 11.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15± 100%, 133 • BP41 CONTENT #35 D3017 7.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%, 1 1-1 5 ± 92.4%, 133 PASS BP42 CONTENT #36 D3017 11.8 - 813 - BARRIER PROTECTION LAYER ASTM ACCEPTANCE TEST RESULTS PASS MAP TEST TYPE METHOD CRITERIA I FAIL KEY # RESULT PAGE NO. INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,11-15 t 100%, 133 BP43 CONTENT #37 D3017 9.8 INSITU COMPACTION: & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 97.0%, 133 PASS BP44 CONTENT #38 D3017 13.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 92.4%, 133 PASS BP45 CONTENT #39 D3017 12-8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D29221 90%,11-15:t 93.1%, 133 "* BP46 CONTENT #40 D3017 15.8 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15 ± 92.8%, 133 PASS BP47 CONTENT #41 D3017 14.4 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922/ 90%,11-15 ± 90.5%, 133 PASS BP48 CONTENT #42 D3017 11.9 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15 ± 99.1%, 133 " BP49 CONTENT #43 D3017 9.0 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%, 11-15 ± 100%, 133 PASS BP50 CONTENT #44 D3017 12.6 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15 ± 91.9%, 133 PASS BP51 CONTENT #45 D3017 14.3 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 90.2%, 133 "' BP52 CONTENT #46 D3017 17.5 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15± 100%, 133 PASS BP53 CONTENT #47 D3017 14.2 INSITU COMPACTION & MOISTURE D2922I 90%,11-15 ± 100%, 133 PASS BP54 CONTENT #48 D3017 12.4 INDICATES THAT MATERIAL WAS SLIGHTLY DRY AT TIME OF TESTING, HOWEVER THE COMPACTION WAS STILL ACCEPTABLE. * INDICATES THAT MATERIAL WAS SLIGHTLY WET AT TIME OF TESTING, HOWEVER THE COMPACTION WAS STILL ACCEPTABLE. -SC- FROM : Ht --C PHONE N0. : 914762886. Jul. 29 1998 05:02FM P4 ( A • Advance Testing Company, Inc. T ■ 22 Sarah Welts Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 14916 • (914) 496-1600 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: Caatre Point Landfill SP TEST EQUIP-. Gauge No. 1 DATE: 07107198 WEATHER' Cloudy, Sprinkles 75.85 F. 2) BACKFILL A) Test Results Comply REPORT: 97-0210-15 Technician B. Schutz s) SUBHAs s) SOIL CEMENT C) After Reem"pacdon 63 at $oil Max Wats in Place Compact Cods Test Location 10 Date Dapt>h 1 Elev No Dry Den Cont Dry Derr. (9y.) ' 1 7l7 6' • 1 st lift 8 116.9 13.9 108.4 92.7 1 A LA 1, Acre 1 Barrier protection P7 2 717 6" -1 st In 8 118.9 12.1 116.9 100.0 1A Lift 1, Acre 1 Barrier protaction P8 3 717 6' -1 st lift 8 116.9 10.3 118.0 100+ 1 A Lift 1, Acre t Barrier protection g Pq 4 717 8" -ist lift 8 116.9 15.0 111.2 95.1 1A Lilt 1. Acre 1 Barrier protection EPIC> 5 71 6" -1 st lift 8 116.9 12.7 113.2 98.8 1A Lift 1, Arm I Barrier pratoctfon f piI 6 717 3" -1st lift 8 116.5 12.0 115.2 98.5 1A Lift 1, Acre 1 $wrier protection (LP(Z 7 Ili 8" -1 st rift 8 116.9 13.3 111.8 95.6 to Lilt 1, Acre 1 Barrier protaetion J?; Q(3 3 7/7 12' -1St lift 3 116.9 8.7 119.7 93.7 1A Special Pro}aet Ares 2 3 egend IMPORTANT NOTES rank of Hooson Canyon Construction was ptesant and aware of test results, LE(;END Alf den, r"orted as pounds pw cubic foot 'ompacdi rr'1: is based On maxirrrum dry density *&Pned on sample indicated by soil ID number vrspectlully Subr"MAN Y ADVANCE TESTING Co. jdL 2 0 'CODES 1) FILL MATERIAL 2) BACKFILL A) Test Results Comply 3) BASE COURSE S) Recompac>S- Required s) SUBHAs s) SOIL CEMENT C) After Reem"pacdon 63 PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Jul. 29 1p98 05.G2PM P5 FROM : HCC A E. Advance Testing Company, Inc. I T 22 SarahWells Traif •Campbell Hail, NY 10916 • (9 14) 496-1600 REPORT OF FIELD COIIMPACnO" TUST3 PROJECT: Casty Paint Landfill SP TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Ccrostructlorl DATE. D71i0198 TEST EQUIP: Gauge No 16 REPORT: 97-0210- 17 Technician F. Barrell WEATHER: Sunny K,f} soil Max Water In Place Compact Code Tact Locatlon� r).0a Depth 1 Elev ' No Dry Den Can' Dry Den. (%)NO ftm North -1 2(Y frorn Fast be 8 118:9 1�.4 North IW from � Oft of slope) dr+PIS 1 7110 S" -lift 1 6 116.9 13.0 109 $ 93.A 1A IW from 150' "M North (toe of slope) 6 PI D 7110 $" ' 100+ 1A g 116.9 14.2 117 n site drawl for IOCations &-P t 7 tiudson Cartyo 3 7110 8" '` B 116.9 13.9 114.5 0 s3F i� 4 7110 a" _. a 116.9 12.8 119.3 100 1A " " l 5 71'10 S" B 116,9 13.2 112.8 96.5 1A 6 ill D a" ' "Elevation: Barrier protection layer IMPORTANT NOTES rank, of Hudson Canyon Construction, was present and aware of test resuits. LEGEND ` Ul derrsiirea :•EPQ� as pounds l� CubrC foot imorr � ie based on maximum dry denslry >pined Ort serrrpfe Indicated Isy sail !D number espec&Ily submitted QVANCE TES71NG Co- 7) Fltl AfATJ MAL 2)BACKRtl 3) SASE COURSE 4) SUBBASE 5) son- CgUENT' 6) A) Test Results COMOY f3) Rcompacuaa Regwrw C) A (W ROCOMP&C"" FROM : HCC �A T C PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Jul. 29 1998 05:01PM P3 Advance Testing Company, inc, JUL 2 7 ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail • Campbell Hall, NY 10916 4,(914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: Hudson Canyon Construction PROJECT: Castle Point Landfill SP TEST EQUIP-. Gauge No. 7 DATE. 07115198 WEATHER: Overcast REPORT: 97-0210- 18 Technician R Sasrelt 'est No pate Depth I Elea 1 07115 a" -Lift i 2 07115 9" -Lift 1 3 07115 8" -L* 1 4 07115 3'' -Lift 2 5 07115 8" -Lift 2 8 07115 3" _Lift 2 7 07/15 3" -Lift 2 a 07115 k3- -Litt 2 9 o7115 a" -Lift 2 ;etierid Soli An" Water In Place Compact Code �/�H (� 70- Test Location y No Dry Den Cont Dry Dan. (%) _ 8 116.9 7.$ ^ 118.0 100+ 1A `See Contractors' site log for lo�%,*tigns. (3pao 8 116.9 9.5 112.7 96.4 1A x 3-P21 8 116.9 11.0 106.2 90.8 1A " "ZZ 8 116.9 12.9 113.8 97.3 1A ' " f5P23 8 116.9 141 109.1 93.3 14 - ' "zq $ 116.9 14.5 1.05.6 90.3 1A ` OZ' ' S 116.9 12.5 117.8 100+ 1A ` 6PZ(� 8 116.9 15.3 312,5 96.2 1A 6-e2"7 8 116.9 15.7 111.5 95.4 1A C3PZii IMPORTANT NOTES 'rank, of Hudson Canyon Construction, was present and dwara of test results. f L,EGENo Aa der( ; reported ars pounds per cubic hoot Compac*,,,, V. is based an Maxlmun* drY denarty obtained on sample indicated by soil ID number Respeatlulty suomiftad ADVANCL57ES17NG Co. *CODES 1) FILL. MATrPIAL 2) BACKF7L L A) rest Results Comply 3) BASE: COURSE 8) Reaompaetlon Required 4) St!$BASE C) Attar Recomprctlon 5) SOIL CEMENT 8) Other H.C.C. Route # TJM SEfi�! - :;vl SR #C 40 �---�� ALE ettu-M To: L,EGENo Aa der( ; reported ars pounds per cubic hoot Compac*,,,, V. is based an Maxlmun* drY denarty obtained on sample indicated by soil ID number Respeatlulty suomiftad ADVANCL57ES17NG Co. *CODES 1) FILL. MATrPIAL 2) BACKF7L L A) rest Results Comply 3) BASE: COURSE 8) Reaompaetlon Required 4) St!$BASE C) Attar Recomprctlon 5) SOIL CEMENT 8) Other 09/03/93 10.34 FAX 9144961398 - ADVANCE TESTING 'Advance Testing Company, Inc. 1 22 Sarah Weals Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 + Fax (914).496-1398 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION I ES I TESTED FOR: HudsbrtCarryon Com truotion PROJECT: Cable paint Lai1dflll SF TEST EQUIP,. Gauos t4o.'2 DATE 07M 7M WEATHM' Sun*wo y Cloudy REPORT: 97.0210- 19 Technician W. Farrow rest j • soir MOX VV81w In Mac* Compact Code No Dain Depth 1 Haw No DryDon Cant DryDen. (-,G) i Test LoaAon Q9 002 1 7M7 8" -* 041 116.9 18.4 1ae.6 82.9 1A 2 7111 8• - #8 116.9 17.9 106.0 9.3.3 1A ^ U P30 3 7117 a' -` A43 116.9 13.0 118.9 100.0 1A - 9P -g( d 7M 7 8' on 116.9 91.7 120.0 100+ 1 A b 7/17 8" - #0 114$.9 10.7 120.9 100+ 1A 6,P33 0 7A7 3• 118 116.9 10.0 119,4 100+ 1A 7 7117 8" a118.9 13.0 114.9 96.3 1A � 8 7117 3" -'' ; j 08 116-9 18.4 109.3 93.5 1A P3�o 9 7117 8- .. 946 116.9 13.5 119,8 100+ 1A 6 P37 10 7117 8" •' 96 116.9 •17.9 110A 94.5 1A P3F 'Elevaticrt BarrierprvbeClidn Isper tegsnd "'tocatlon: See �tlado;3 tlrewinq Eor 9orstiorr det3e�. IMPORTANT NOTES iV Alf dsnslslss rgpdriedas Fa+n� P� oelbf0 boot Canvpx too % 14.1- ort, maximum dry density Wff 0b* t 00 Vie, bdlsstad by soif 10 000bef Res��Yaabmlttsd AD' . VC& 7897040 Ca. "CODES ?) P&L ]MATERIAL 2) BACKR" N Tea! Rawlt* COMP1Y 3) SAS!/ COURSE 8)Racomp o0w Rpuirod 4j 311N&WE C) Ait4F Recompscfiod 5j SO& CEMENT 13Z SECTION 9: TOPSOIL, SEED AND FERTILIZER INFORMATION FROG 1 HCC PHONE NO. : 9147628863 7u 1. 31 1998 o3: ©epm P2 Y H.Q.C. HUDSON CANYON CONSTRUCTION 16 SCHUMAN ROAD MILLWOOD, 14Y 10546 (SW 631.131 t July 31, 199$ Mr. Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin Consulting Engineers 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12641 Re: Castlepoint Landfill Wappingers, New York H,C.C. project Nov 1152 Pre-Qualification.lest, Results Topsoil Layer Dear Mr. Paggi; Please End enclosed one (1) copy of the pre qualification test results from Advanced Testing Company, Inc., submitted as req_uirr�d for the 6" Topsoil Layer of the above referenced project for your roview and approval. Please note that the required percent organics for this particular sample is a little lower than the specified amount. This material was sampled at Southern Dutchess Sand and Gravel Pit in Fishkill, NY. For your information, this particular material has been used as "Topsoil" on the Taconic State Parkway, and an the Phillipstown Landfill. Both of these projects had great success in achieving a uniform stand of vegetation. If you have any questions, or require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, HUDSON CANYON CONSTRUCTION. INC. Christopher T. Coyle etc I Enclosures (2) r- Uli•dl/106 14;40 &'V14 4aV 1400 "VA1Vl:t LADLIAU Report of pli and, Organic Content of -Soft Client Hudson Conshnffan Pm4wt Caaft Post Landfill To"011 ATC #: 970210 • soumes S. ouGrheas Sand & Gravel ffication: Pro". SpecL 5.01 1201 A ata Sampled: 7128198 ied : C. Cavalad Dabs Tested:. 7130198 T F K pH Test Method: X ASTM 4972 Maud A (Meter) ASTM 4972 Method 8 (Paper) Organic % Test Mseiod: ASTM 297487 (Ash Method) X AAS HTO T104 -S7 (Wet Combustion) Summary, of pH and Organic Content Test Results ATC Lab* 9M519 Spec. ' 7.5 5.5T7.G % is 1.1 220 Noes: Orgastic tee, results do not =rnpiy with specifiecafion. PH tW resub comply with speot on_ Re _ RWewed B _ A T C Advance Testing Company, Inc. ■ 22 Sarah Wells Trail - Campbell Hall, NY 10916 • (914) 496-1600 • Fax (914) 496-1398 Report of Triaxial Pearmeability_Test Using Back Pressure Test Method: ASTM 05084 Client: Hudson Canyon Construction Project: Castle Point Landfill Item: Clay Barrier Recom acted #2 ATC Project #: 970210 Source: On-site Lift #3 Acre #2 ATC Lab #: 98-0329 Date Sampled: 6110198 Sampled By: B. Schutz Date Tested: 6112/98 jTesWd B C. Devlin Proctor Test Data ASTM Proctor Test Method: D698 Maximum D Density, PCF; 114.6 Optimum Moisture Content, Percent of Dry Weight: 14.3 Sam ie Preparation Method: Soil clods brokenichopped to pass 114" sieve. Compacted in 1cm lifts, scarified between lifts. Test Sample Dimensions Before Test After Test Height, cm: 11.23 9.63 Diameter, cm: 7.28 7.59 Moisture Content, %: 15.00 20.30 Dry Densi , PCF' 100.94 108.34 Permeability Test Conditions Type of Water Used: Tap Water Maximum Back Pressure, PSI: 68.12 Hydraulic Gradient: 20.13 Effective Stress, PSI (minimax): 2.5915.80 Initial D22ree of Saturation, %: 1 62.21 Final Degree of Saturation, %: 1 102.06 Specific Gravity = 2.65 (estimated) Permeability Test Results Coefficient of Permeability @ 20'C (68°F): k2o = 1.3 x 10-s cm/sec Specification: k2o = 1 e cmisec or less Notes: Sample compaction level insufficient to meet specification requirements. Higher held compaction is required to achieve specified permeability. 5,000 to 10,000 Cu. Yd. Sa ple Report Reviewed By: _.. je llr�� ,SUN Rot>ttx - TJK4 BEM IM SR MB cc JD _ is FILA ;?etum To: Re: Castlepoint Landfill Wappingers, New York HCC Project No. 1162 Topsoil Analysis Results Dear Mr. Paggi: Please find enclosed a copy of the soil sample analysis report performed by David N. York, Ph.D., soil. scientist. The material tested and analyzed is the previously submitted topsoil proposed for use on the above referenced project. If ; o?i ha.ti,e any questions, or require any further information, please do. not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, HUDSON CANYON CONSTRUCTION, INC. Mitchell G. Berkey, P.E. L�� FR❑M : -MURNAhENT -LRF LA30RRT❑RIES PH04E N❑. : 7248932329 Tournament TUff P September 91 1998 Mr. Christopher T. Coyle Hudson Canyon Construction, Inc. 16 Schuman Road Millwood, NY 10546 Dear Chris: Sep. 10 1998 09:52AN P1 Enclosed are the soil analysis results for the topsoil sample that you sent to us for testing. KAY 'FindiD95*1 Soil Test Results/Topsoil COMENTS: The exchangeable soil calcium level is high and the exchangeable -soil magnesium level is low in the topsoil. However, water soluble nutrient analysis shows that the soluble calcium and magnesium levels are bath adequate/slightly low, sc sufficient calcium and magnesium should be available to sustain acceptable growth from turfgrass. The soil potassium and phosphorus levels are very low and the micronutrient boron is law in the sail,. The specificatibns that were sent to us for review stated that 18-5•-9 fertilizer should be mixed into the top 2 inches of topsoil at a rate of 30 pounds per thousand sq. ft_ This should provide adequate nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium for turf establishment. Even though the soil pH as measured in these tests is slightly alkaline, the topsoil should support the growth of turfgrass. The organic matter of the topsoil ,ample was low (14;). However, the soil organic matter should increase as the turf crows and the clippings are allowed to decompose and return to the soil, " 2h.;- ALKALINE 8.2 Q (Calculated cation exchange EXCHANGEABLE CALCIUM, Ca: EXCHANGEABLE MAGNESIUM, Mg: EXCHANGEABLE POTASSIUMO K; EXCHANGEABLE SODIUM, Na.- PHOSPHORUS, a:PHOSPHORUS, P�05: SULFATES, SO4: TOTAL SOLUBLE SALTS (mmhos/cm): MICRONUTRIENTS: BORON, B; COPPER, CU; ZINC, Zn: MANGANESE, Mn: IRON, F*: Capacity) 17.2 VERY HIGH LOW VERY LOW ACCEPTABLE LOW LEVEL IV -my LOW SLIGHTLY HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW LEVEL LOW ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE X= rindina@:_ Water Soluble Soil Nutrient Results/Topsoil CALCIUM, Ca: ADEQUATE/SLIGHTLY Low MAGNESIUM, Mg.- ADEQUATE/SLIGHTLY LOW POTASSIUM, K: VERY LOW SODIUM, Na: ACCEPTABLE LOW LEVEL AMMONnM-NITROGEN, NH4-N: ACCEPTABLE I David W. York, Ph.D. • Phyllis R. York Tuifgress Consultants 405 Glade Mill Read 9 Valencia, PA 16059 0 Phone/FAX 724,898.2329 FROM TOUlRNRMENT TURF LPBORA70RIES PHONE NO. : 724898239 Sep, 10 1998 09:53AM P2 pagre 2 KAY = : Water Soluble Sail Nutrient Results/Topsoil Continued: BICARBONATES, TjCO3: ox SULFATES, Soo: OK CZMORIDES , Cl: OK NITRATE -NITROGEN, H03 -N: LOW PROS -PRATE -PHOSPHORUS, PC4-p ; LOW 5ug9eeted Fertility Inputs for Hudson Canyon Construction topsoil Nitrogen/Phosphorus/Potassium: APpl.i.cation of S pounds of i8-5-9 fertilizer (50* from an organic component) will provide 5.4 pounds of nitrege:l, 1.5 pounds of phosphorus(pZoS), and 2.7 pounds of patassieun (RZo) per thousand sq. ft. This should be adequate fertility for turf establisbment. Calcium-, None required. Magneaiun: None .required. Micronutrients: A complete micronutrient formulation(s) should be applied with the hydroseed/mulch according to product label rates. If you have any questions about these results, do not hesitate to call me at (724)898-2329. Sinwt rely r (7 bavid W. York, Ph4'D. Tournament Ttt f L$boratories , Inc. FROM : T0URNAMS=NT TLRF LA30RPTORIES PHONE NO. : 724B9e2329 Sep. 10 199Q 09:53 '9 P3 TOURN -T TulzF LABORATORIES, . INC . DAVID W. Ycp K, Ph.D. SOIL ANALYSIS AND NiT R Lp- T BALANCE REPORT --- ---------------------------------- Account # 333 Date: September 4, 1998 Hudson Canyon COMStructiori SamPle ID Topsoil PH - 8.20 Buffer pH = NA C.B.C. : 17.20 Organic Matter (t) 1.00 EXCHANGEABLE-CATIOtIS SASE SATURATION PERCENT Calcium Ubs/acre) nesired value value found 4678 ( 65.00% t4 70.000 Copper Deficit 6158 0 89,50 Magnesium {lbs/acre) Desired value value found 630 { 12.50% to 17.50*1 Iron Deficit 276 354 6.57% potassi= (lbsrac=e, Desired value Value found 537 ( 3 .00�r t4 5.0096) Deficit 62 475 0.46 Sodium. (lbs/acre) 22 0.27 Cther catione 3:2090 Hydrogen 0.00V Atv'IONS Phosphates as P205 (lbs/acre) Sulfate -S P.p.m SOLUBLE SALTS ------------- Desired value Value found Deficit. Des- red value Value found mn hos/ L -M 0.20 1^0.00 23.00 127.Q0 40.00 5"7.00 EXTRACTABLE hIZCR0NP1"�IENTS (Parts ger million) Bar= 0.10 TARGET 0.50 vALuas - Copper 2.00 0.50 1.50 - 3.00 Zinc Manganese 5.70 19.00 .3.00 - 15.00, Iron 25.70 5.00 20.00 - 20.00 - 60.00 FROM : TOCJR4 QA eJ -LRF LASORATORIES PHONE NO. : 7248982329 Sep. 1-0 1998 09:54AM P4 Tournament Turf Laboratories, Inc. Anter '90lub r So' Nwrient AnalysosA f TTL4 ce rt Account # 333 Date; 49/04198 Hudson Canyon Construction Sample ID # I Topsoil pIf M 8,3 Total soluble taltr, mmhoa/em 0.20 (Water extract from saturated paste) % OF TOTAL SOLUBLE CATIONS Calcium Ca. Value found (ppm) - 75 (rrzr,�ll} = 3.8 62.6% Magnesium, M$ Value found (pprn) = 19 1.5 15.9% Potassiunn, K(meg11) Value found (ppm) 2 (MegA) _ <0.I 0.9% Sodium, Na Value found(rraeq�ll (Ppm.) - 14 0.5 10.2% Ansrnoraum-Nitrogen, NH4 -N Value found (ppm) s 0.3 (megA) - <0, I 0.4% RATIOS: Ca:NA - 6.3 Ca,Mg = 2.5 Ca:K - 38.0 Mg:K = 15.0 NS (Water extract from saturated paste) % OF TOTAL SOLUBLE AN]10NS Bicarbonate, HCO3 Value found (ppm) - 163 (meq/1) = 2.7 44.6% Sulfate, SO 4 Valuc found (ppm) = 46 (mtq/1) 2.9 48.2°i, Chloride, Cl Value found (ppm) = 14 (megll) - 0.4 6,6% Nrtrate-Nitrogen, NO i -N Value found (ppm) = 0.3 (meg/1) - <0,1 0.4% Phosphate-Phosphorw, p04 -p Value found (ppm) = <4.1 (me4q) = <0, i <0.1% Boron, B Valuc found ( m' = <0. i (Ppin) (Meq/1) <O. l 0.2°fin Sodium Adsorption Radio, SAR 0.4 Electrical Conducdyity, ECe mmho/cm 0.5 FROM HCC NO,. 9147628863 HuCaCe HUDSON CANYQN "-pNSTRUCTION Mr. Peter Paw Paggi $ .Martin Consulting Engineers 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New Fork 12601 Dean' Mr. paggi: 8eP. 25 1998 12:30FRIM p2 1s SCHUMAN RoAc • MILLWOOD, NY 1(M48 (914) 031.1311 September 25, 1998 Re: CastlepOint Landfill WaPPingers, New Y.,k H.C.C. Project NO. 1162 Submittals Topsoll/Seeding Application Please find enclosed the re for the above referenced �Wred sulsmitfals far Project: the remaining topsoil and seeding applications 1. A re -submittal o.f Z)x. David application rate; I Wanted to resub s topsoil xe o approve the mit this repo os duet a mis, 2 A submittal spec ed topsoil utaterial. You to e s take in a tili documents spec sheet for the ttte You will still Pecified , 'This -seed Proposed seed s rate b _seethe wi1I be a � as specified ' Landscaping, Y HYdro-seeding Peed the m the contract I' g, inc., lite. 52 Box 549, Opens service Will be proper fertilizer at the • A submittal bam, NY 125L7. POr#0r-ed by Old Q Dr. David YoPecrficatiOn sheet for the ak Note: p � and � died by Mer,itt osed Seed Corr�-9 fertilizeruggeste Id Oak Lands Pay. unix as d by . spelled out � Landscaping, Will be responsible for the �. s the can p fications, mance Also, T Would Rise to period as day, September 2$ notify You of Hudson Can as we will be mobil1zing the s IPer equipment of g the Pro ere S�xn P 9uipxnent this �endsoii layer ori W FROM HCC PHONE NO. 9117628863 Sep. 25 1998 12:31PM P7 C ' iU�Sd►`s ANYON CONSTRUCTI • � 2 W September 25,1948 Mr. Pete�r'Paggi If you have any questions, or Tequire any ftuther information, please do not hesitate to contact me,. Once again I would life to thank you and your client for your patience throughout the pxoject. very truly yours, CANYON CONSTRUCTION, INC. ;r T. C e ctc Enclosures (4) FROM : HCC OF— T, F—. T r "Wam�� T 1LA6ORATORIES, INC September 17, '1998 PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Mr. Christopher T• Coyle Hudson Canyon Construction, Inc, 16 Schuman Road Millwood, NY 10546 Dear Chris: 31998 Sep. 25 199e 12:32PM P6 The following is s revision of the September 9, 1998 correction was made for the suggested application of 18--5- Enclosed are the soil analysis results for the topsoi sent to us for testing. Key FinSoil Test Results/Topsoil for Castlepoint project gopg4ENT�_ The exchangeable soil calcium level is high and the exchangeable soil magnesium level is low in the topsoil. However, water soluble nutrient analysis shows that the soluble calcium and magnesium levels are both adequate/slightly low, so sufficient calcium and magnesium should be ava°'able to sustain acceptable growth from turfgrass_ The soil potassium an& hosphorus levels are very low and the micronutrient boron is low in the soil. The specifications that were sent to us for review stated that 18-6-9 fertilizer should be mixed into the top 2 inches 6-f topsoil at a rate of 30 pounds per thousand sq. ft. Application of 10 pounds of 18-5-9 per thousand sq. ft. should provide adequate nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium for turf establishment. Even though the soil pH as measured in these tests is slightly alkaline, the topsoil should support the growth of turfgrass. The organic matter of the topsoil sample was low (1%). However, the soil organic matter should increase as the turf grows and the clippings are allowed to decompose and return to the soil. SOI g:i ALKA,LINE = 8.2 CEC (Calculated cation exchange EXCHANGEABLE CALCIUM, Ca: EXCHANGEABLE MAGNESIUM, Mg: EXCHANGEABLE POTASSIUM, K: EXCHANGEABLE SODIUM, Na: PHOSPHORUS, P205; SULFATES, SO4: TOTAL SOLUBLE SALTS (m=hos/cm): MICRONUTRIENTS: BORON, B: COPPER, Cu: ZING, Zn: MANGANESE, Mn: IRON, Fe: capacity) — 17.2 VERY HIGH LOW VERY LOW ACCEPTABLE LOW LEVEL, VERY LOW SLIGHTLY HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW LEVEL LOW ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE David W. York, Pn,D, - Phyllis R. Yorl Turfgrass Consultants JA4 /`IBJ.. P.A31 0,,,,..4 . t/,.1---;- AA I Af) CO . Dt....,., /CA V 7n A 000 h7+5n FROM : HCC PHONE NO. : 9147628863 Sep. 25 1998 12:';.QPM P7 KQY F'n . Water Soluble Soil Nutrient Results/TopsOil CALCIUM, Ca: MAGNESIUM, Mg: POTASSIUM, K: SODIUM, Na: AMMONIU14-NITROGEN , NH4,-N: BICARBONATES, HCO3: SULFATES, SO4: CHLORIDES, Cl: NITRATE -NITROGEN, NO3-N: PHOSPHATE --PHOSPHORUS, PO4-F: ADEQUATE/SLIGHTLY LOW ADEQUATE/SLIGHTLY LOW vtRY LOW ACCEPTABLE LOW LEVEL ACCEPTABLE OK OK OK LOW LOW page 2 Suggested Fertility inputs for Hudson Canyon Construction topsoil 9/17/98 Nitrogen/Phosphorus/Potassium: Application of 30 pounds of 18-5-9 fertilizer (50% from an organic component) as stated in the specification will provide 5.4 pounds of nitrogen, 1.5 pounds of phosphorus (P205), and 2.7 pounds of potassium (K20) per thousand sq. ft. Application of 10 pounds of this fertilizer per thousand sq. ft, should provide adequate fertility for turf establishment on this soil. Calcium-, Magnesium: None required. None required_ Micronutrients.: A complete micronutrient formulation(s) should be applied with the hydroseed/mulch according to product label. rates. If you have any questions about these results, do not hesitate to call me at (724)898-2329. IY/ David W. jor, Ph.D. Tournament rf Laboratories, Inc. FROM : MCC PHONE NO. 9147628663 Sep. 25 1996 12:31PM P4 09/2a1:39� 12:7.3 57 F31bes ME4'., 8'7i i�'r . -- s'1"ANI..t"� M. ��• Tlll� LONSI?LTAN'r MypRprAW.C:" �Ir*R{ocJ'fQ� a asev ""x'Es' I"'�s sa IL ou Rip [I�tOEN�N �dhii'1lOLMR4 T�' �iA'jW rmpto' %P.Lc V1 t4*Vd•0 M1IIl7M Ypltet ►3Qi'1 �L.���; �te,e�.OetG p'A7[F �D.4�u.pfl7i SqVW-ber 23, 199 8 liv& ri cWygr Condit udkm 113 D4vecs Ave, N, Tas TI&Wa.14Y 10591 TV, wham it may c4 tcem Tkb is to van€} the wxd mixture float Mwitt Seed Company wilt M fftY, to old Osis La%b"P.iM Oknh= N.X. 12528 6ar use on tht CutlePlrg LaUMU ?mA0';0amms to tba following spWf5t,ada= r p .ear mlim milli .7AdCU Eutim QQ= 30 % 1'ereo�a�l l yegrass 95.E 85% 30% Keo=ky-31 "Y`ali F=uc 95.40 q 85% 20 94 iCMUIC4 81'eesm 85,W% SO% 20% Cmapag Red Amue 95.001/1 00/0 'Fhb Beed will be paciapd sti 50 pauvA aCalcd bar -ith labels bearing ft Lm =nbcr Ma 4197 the ;fob, CaMeplut LandMi , wid the permta}0e Of the mtxbrxre for purity, genian, crap seed, wmd iced cautrut and irucxt m4*681. I aqsdWtha: 033 a iA&=atiaa is =ntct t6 the beat of any lMOW104e. VIA cola ` IL ;r► FROM : HCC PHONE NO. : 914762BB63 51 c a3IL9fla5 215sw ee" STA-N'6—Ay "1 9150", Sep. 25 1998 12:32PM P5 NAP CDNW-LTmw �f''F�" �+ �/� e�,IWE� Nr�aKSMULGK Gls7R�T� eM�e• mam "wTurt" swwww 23.0998 pRs 1FG1MwoG SOONqN QprdT'R /,i,GVr1tJ��/ti.b+fa NEV►' YDiNt 15017 G'rTEFr'Ra i0 IApU.�1D��b�%� 7'RI.,�idOl�t 3d'l.e19*'� Hobw Cy" gansuvaion 115 Dates Ave,NY 10591 To whDm it MAY OOMAM• "1'l % is 1, verify the fimUli=r meat tAan'ttt Seed QMPMY wii11 supply to Old C)ak Lm&.ping for uw an the ondc ut isne'll PMM is 8$ follows; i -5-9 (50% pr c) xhss Vmuless 18 Zbs, of available Nitrol pa CWS' of whioh 50 % a raw nitmPA is daivd from arca ram f hushing a rnipiwum of 3.5 % WK Tisa 1pdw= of mtm$m is UxiYed from me6ylarit wm en&or water` soluble emca afxlor nitre andlot satmonsacal oomponnes. The r0x=fwu=. ji Azaawes S IbL of arseilable P205 CWT whkb is 44t ive,ditam Dj=mpvimn rh=pbam anWcr NWom retx oniottt Phosphate and/or SuPST0030me. Ttty mmnft awe's ZOW&Maes 9 ft, of CWT AM is dadved fmm mudte of?Q%W . The prod=t is packaged by the m$miac'turer iri 5 D I, bap bcWift the 18.54 (50%) QRg�sio tts�ICteg, I cat* the aba" ' wift is correct to the best of my krs0%vloc P