Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Castle Point Landfill Closure (2)
es StatDepartenRnvironmental Conservation Am 2othPuttd New Paltz, NY 12561 liftow (914) 255-5453 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner August 17, 1987 Town of Wappinger P. O. Box 324 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 RE: Town of Wappinger Landfill Order on Consent DEC Case #3-1432/8707 Dear Sir or Madam: DEC is currently engaged in an enforcement program designed to bring all active, unpermitted landfills in the Region under Order on Consent. The Order would allow each landfill to legally continue operation while studies are performed to determine if the landfill is in compliance with applicable regulations. Landfills determined to be in compliance may then enter the permit application process. Those which are not in compliance or those which the operators chose to close will be phased out. Landfills not brought under Order in this program will be subject to enforcement action, including assessment of penalties. We are in receipt of the letter from your consulting engineer, Peter J. Paggi, dated June 16, 1987, notifying the Department of the Town's intention to apply for assistance under the Environmental Quality Bond Act (Title 5 - Municipal Landfill Closure Projects). Consequently, I have enclosed for your review an Order on Consent which imposes a legal obligation to close the landfill. This legal obligation will permit the Town to apply for the 500 loan for landfill closure expenses. if you have any questions regarding the technical or legal aspects of the Order, please contact either myself, Rich Gardineer or Larry Gallagher as soon as possible. If you are willing to resolve this matter on the terms outlined in the Order, please sign the Consent Page and have the signature notarized. The Order should then be returned to me at the address indicated on the letterhead. you will be (T) Wappinger Page 2 August 17, 1987 provided with a copy of the Order after it is executed by the Department. The Order should be returned no later than September 30, 1987. However,if you need more time to review the Order and reach a decision, please contact me before that date for an extension. I look forward to your early reply. Very truly yours, Katherine Hudson Assistant Regional Attorney Region 3 KH/cli Enclosure CC., Peter J. Paggi Paggi and Martin 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 NEW YOTLK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MrvIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of Alleged Violations of Article 27 of the Environmental Conservation Law ("ECL") and Part 360 of Title 6 of ORDER the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and ON Regulations of the State of New York (116NYCRR"), CONSENT by TOWN OF WAPPINGER Respondent WHEREAS: Case #3-1432/8707 1. The Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter "the Department" or "DEC") regulates Solid Waste Management Facilities pursuant tq Article 27, Title 7 of the ECL.. 2. Respondent operates a solid waste management facility, as that term is defined in Section 360.1(d)(69) of 6NYCRR, in the Town of Wappinger, County of Dutchess, State of New York (the "Facility"). 3. DEC alleges that Respondent has violated certain terms of 6NYCRR Part 360, including section 360.2(b). Respondent denies these allegations. The parties have determined to resolve this matter on the terms set forth in this Order. 4. Pursuant to 6NYCRR Section 360.3(e)(1)(i), an operation permit for a solid waste management facility in existence on the effective date of Part 360 shall be issued only if the facility has been demonstrated to be capable of compliance with the standards of operation set forth in Section 360.8. 5. The Respondent and the Department hereby acknowledge that the purposes and goals of this Order are that the Respondent shall: a) take all reasonable steps to operate the Facility during the duration of this Order in compliance with the operating standards set forth in Section 360.8, including any revisions hereafter promulgated, the Special Conditions of any previously issued Part 360 Permit and any other requirements of this Order. For purposes of this Order on Consent, "operating standards" of Section 360.8 shall mean: all provisions of - 1 - Section 360.8(a), except section 360.8(a)(1) as it relates to groundwaters, and except section 360.8(a)(2); and all provisions of Section 360.8(b)(1). Respondent may request a variance from one or more operating standards, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Paragraph XXI. b) Undertake an investigative program to ascertain if the Facility is in compliance with, or is capable of complying with: 1) design and operating standards set forth at 6NYCRR Section 360.8; 2) groundwater quality standards set forth at 6NYCRR Section 703.5, 3) federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D (40 CFR 257) Open Dump Inventory, and c) Based on the results of the foregoing investigative program, submit and implement a phase-out/closure plan for the landfill in an environmentally sound manner, and also inform the Department whether it intends to participate in a regional or County -wide solid waste disposal system or some other method of disposal. 6. Without admitting any violation of law, and with respect to all violations alleged by DEC to have occurred prior to the effective date of this Order, Respondent has affirmatively waived its right to notice and hearing in the manner provided by law and has consented to the issuing and entering of this Order and agrees to be bound by the terms, provisions and conditions contained therein. NOW, having considered this matter and being duly advised, it is ORDERED that: I. Standards for continued operation. Respondent shall hereafter take all reasonable steps to operate the Facility in compliance with the operating standards set forth in 6NYCRR Section 360.8, including any revisions hereafter promulgated, and in compliance with the Special Conditions of any previously issued Part 360 Permit and any other requirements set forth in this Order. II. PSIP. Respondent shall submit for approval by the Department a Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program (PSIP) to determine the Facility's compliance, or capability of compliance, with: a) Sections 360.8 and 703.5 of 6NYCRR; and - 2 - b) the standards of Part 257 of 40 CFR (Open Dump Inventory). The PSIP shall provide for the development of sufficient information to allow DEC to determine if the facility is causing or has caused contravention of groundwater 'quality standards, and, if so, to evaluate the nature and extent of such contamination. The PSIP shall include those items listed in Appendix A which are necessary to make those determinations for the site. Respondent shall submit the PSIP within 150 days of receiving a request from the Department to do so. The PSIP, as approved, shall be deemed incorporated into this Order as Appendix D. III. PSIP implementation. Respondent shall undertake and carry out the subsurface investigation program consistent with the PSIP, as approved by the Department. IV. SIR. Within 210 days of receiving notice that the PSIP is approved, Respondent shall submit a Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) determining the following: a. compliance with Sections 360.8 and 703.5 of 6NYCRR; b. compliance with the standards of Part 257 of 40 CFR (Open Dump Inventory). The SIR Format and implementation schedule to be applied are found in Appendix B. The SIR, when approved, shall be deemed incorporated into this Order as Appendix E. i V. SIR_ supplementation. The Department reserves the right to require a modification and/or an,amplification and expansion of the subsurface investigative report by Respondent if the Department determines that further investigation is necessary, as a result of reviewing data generated by the subsurface investigation or as a result of reviewing other data or facts concerning the Facility. VI. Notice of compliance or non-compliance. Upon review of an approved SIR, Respondent shall be notified in writing whether the facility is in compliance with the regulations and laws set forth in Paragraph II. - 3 - VII. Closure. As Respondent does not desire to continue operation of the Facility, Respondent shall close the facility pursuant to the terms and schedule set forth below: a) Respondent shall submit to the Department for approval a plan for the closure of the Facility. The Closure Plan shall be submitted within 120 calendar days of receipt of the notification described in Paragraph VI. The Closure Plan shall contain -the information set forth in Appendix C. b) Upon receiving notification from the Department that the Closure Plan is approved, Respondent shall carry out the Closure Plan according to the approved schedule. C) The Respondent shall, within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification described in Paragraph VI, inform the Department whether it intends to Participate in a regional or County -wide solid Waste Disposal System or some other specified method of disposal. VIII. Review of submissions. (a) Within 30 calendar days after receipt of the PSIP, SIR or Closure Plan, the Department shall notify the Respondent; in writing, whether the submission is approved or is deficient. A submission will be considered "deficient" if it does not clearly and completely set forth all of the material information required by the appropriate Appendix to this Order. Any notice of deficiency issued by the Department shall specify with particularity the nature of all deficiencies. - 4 - (b) If written notice of approval or deficiency is not provided within the 30 day time period, the Respondent may request, in writing, that such notice be issued immediately. If the Department fails to provide the written notice within ten business days after receiving such a request, the submission in question shall be deemed approved as submitted. (c) Within sixty days of receiving notice that a document is deficient, Respondent shall resubmit the document in revised form, addressing the deficiencies of which notice was given. The Department shall notify the Respondent in writing of its approval or disapproval of the revised document. Such notice shall be governed by the procedures and time limits set forth in subparagraphs (a) and (b) above; provided, however, that if the revised document is materially deficient, Respondent may be found in violation of this Order. Respondent shall have the right to an administrative hearing with respect to any finding of violation under this subparagraph. IX. Studies; SE RA classification. The parties agree that each of the studies provided for by this Agreement constitutes a Type II Action pursuant to 6NYCRR 617.13(d)(18). Any permit application or Closure Plan which may be submitted by Respondent pursuant to Paragraph VII shall be subject to normal review procedures under the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"). X. Split samAles. The Department shall have the right to obtain for the purpose of comparative analysis "split samples or duplicate samples", at the Department's option and expense, of all substances and materials sampled by Respondent pursuant to this Order. As used herein: "split samples" shall mean whole samples divided into aliquots; "duplicate samples" shall mean multiple samples, collected at the same time from exactly the same location, using the same sampling apparatus, collected into identical containers prepared identically, filled to the same volume, and thereafter identically handled and preserved. XI. Notice of work. Respondent shall provide notice to the Department of any excavating, drilling, cover construction, cover placement, or other closure related activities sampling conducted pursuant to the terms of this Order at least five (5) working days in advance of such activities. DEC shall make all reasonable efforts to visit the site during such activities, and to be available for consultation with respect to such activities. XII. Fi_ ling. Within 30 days after the effective date of this Order, Respondent shall file a copy of this Order with the real property records of the Dutchess County Clerk's Office, for the purpose of providing notice of this Order to all potential future purchasers of any portion of the Site. Any successor in - 5 - title to any portion of the Site shall be responsible for implementing the provisions of this Order. XIII. Conveyance. In the event that Respondent proposes to ;convey the whole or any part of its ownership interest in the ;Facility, Respondent shall, not less than 30 days prior to the .consummation of such proposed conveyance, notify the Department °in writing of the identity of the transferee and of the nature and date of the proposed conveyance. In advance of such ;proposed conveyance, Respondent shall notify the transferee in ;writing, with a copy to the Department, of the applicability of this Order. XIV. Communications among parties. (a) All communications to the Department, except those referred to in subparagraph (b), shall be made to: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 ATT: Richard Gardineer, Regional Solid and Hazardous Waste Engineer Four (4) copies shall be submitted. (b) All reports and submissions comprising any Part 360 ipermit application which may be made by Respondent shall be ,submitted to: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 ATT: Ralph Manna, Regional Permit Administrator Four (4) copies shall be submitted. (c) All communications to the Respondent shall be made to: Town of Wappinger P. O. Box 324 20 Middlebush Rd. Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 (d) The parties reserve the right to designate other addresses on written notice to all other parties. XV. Inspections. For the purpose of insuring compliance with this Order, duly authorized representatives of the Department shall be permitted access to the site in question during reasonable hours, in order to conduct such inspections of the Facility or its records or to perform such tests as may be deemed necessary to determine the status of Respondent's compliance with this Order and with applicable laws and regulations. XVI. Other apDrovals. Respondent shall use its best !efforts to obtain whatever permits, easements, rights-of-way, rights-af-entry, approvals or authorizations may be necessary to perform its obligations pursuant to this Order. XVII. Force majeure. Respondent shall not suffer any penalty under this Order, or be subject to any proceedings or actions for any remedy or relief, if it cannot comply with any requirements of this Order because of the action of a national ;or local government body (excluding Respondent) or court, an act of God, war, strike or riot, as to which negligence or .willful misconduct on the part of Respondent was not a proximate cause, provided, however, that Respondent shall immediately notify the Department in writing when it obtains knowledge of any such condition and request an appropriate :extension or modification of the provisions hereof. XVIII. Modification. If, for any reason, Respondent desires that any term, provision or condition of this Order be .'changed, Respondent shall make written application therefor to the Department setting forth reasonable grounds for the relief sought together with any supporting documentation establishing such grounds. Such request shall be made as soon as reasonably possible after Respondent learns of the grounds for such relief. No change or modification to this Order shall be made or be effective except as may be specifically set forth in writing by the Department. Such relief shall not be ;unreasonably withheld. Respondent shall have the right to an Eadministrative hearing with regard to any denial of a request for modification of this order. XIX. other remedies. (a) Nothing contained in this Order ;shall be construed as barring, diminishing, enlarging, adjudicating or in any way affecting (1) any legal, ;administrative or equitable rights or claims, actions, suits, :causes of action or demands whatsoever that the Department may have against anyone other than Respondent, its directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, successors and assigns; (2) the Department's right to enforce, administratively or at law or in equity, the terms, provisions and conditions of this Order against Respondent, its directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, successors.and assigns in the event that Respondent shall be in material breach of the provisions hereof; (3) the Department's right to bring any action, administratively or at law or in equity against Respondent, its directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, successors and assigns which the Department could otherwise maintain with respect to areas or resources that may have been affected or contaminated as a result of the release or migration of wastes from the site or from areas in the vicinity of the site; (4) the Department's right to commence any action or proceeding relating to or arising out of any disposal of hazardous or industrial wastes at the site, as those wastes are defined by applicable regulation; or (S) the Respondent's right to challenge any such action by the Department, whether by - 7 - administrative hearing or otherwise, to the extent otherwise permitted by law. (b) This Order shall not be construed to prohibit the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative from exercising any summary abatement powers, either at common law or as granted pursuant to statute or regulation. (c) The Commissioner may, at any time, make a determination pursuant to Title 13 of Article 27 of the ECL of whether the site constitutes a significant threat to the environment and whether Respondent shall be required to undertake an inactive hazardous waste disposal site remedial program. Any such determination shall be provided to .Respondent by the Department in writing. In the event such determination is made, the Department shall have the right to take such enforcement or other action as may be authorized by law, and to require appropriate modifications in any Closure Plan for the Facility. The Respondent shall have the right to challenge such action, to the extent otherwise permitted by law. (d) This Order shall not be construed to impair the Respondent's eligibility for any funding assistance which might otherwise be available to Respondent under the 1986 Environmental Quality Bond Act or any other source. XX. Indemnification. Respondent shall indemnify and hold the Department, the State of New York, and their representatives and employees harmless for all third -party claims, suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description arising out of or resulting from the fulfillment or attempted fulfillment of this Order by Respondent, its directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, successors or assigns; provided, however, that Respondent shall not be required to provide indemnification for any negligence or intentional wrongdoing of the State, DEC or their employees. XXI. Effective date. The effective date of this Order shall be the date that a fully executed copy of this Order is served upon the Respondent, in person or by mail. XXII. Termination. (a) This Agreement shall terminate upon the final closure of the Facility pursuant to an approved closure plan, or permitting of the Facility pursuant to paragraph VII of this Order. (b) Upon DEC's approval or disapproval of the PSIP and/or SIR, the Respondent shall have the sole option to terminate this order, by providing written notice to DEC of a resolution of the Town Board authorizing such action. In that event, all obligations of and protections afforded to both parties under this Order shall cease. DEC may then pursue, and Respondent may challenge, such enforcement measures as may have been available in the absence of this Order, for any violations alleged to have occurred either before or after the effective date of this Order. XXIII. Full settlement. The Department shall not institute any administrative, civil or criminal action or proceeding for penalties or other relief for any violations which DEC alleges to have occurred prior to the effective date of this Order for so long as Respondent remains in compliance with this Order. XXIV. Entire agreement. The provisions hereof shall constitute the complete and entire Order between Respondent and the Department concerning the site. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary the terms hereof shall be binding unless made in writing and subscribed by the party to be bound. No informal advice, guidance, suggestions or comments by the Department regarding reports, proposals, plans, specifications, schedules or any other writing submitted by Respondent shall be construed as relieving Respondent of its obligations to obtain such formal approvals as may be required by this order. XXV. Use of existing information. To the greatest extent practicable, the PSIP and SIR, as well as any Environmental Impact Statement which may be required, shall incorporate information and facilities which have already been developed. XXVI. Appendices. All Appendices to this Order shall be considered part of this Order. Failure to comply with the requirements set forth in any Appendix may be considered a violation of this Order. XXVII. Binding effect. The provisions and conditions of this Order shall be deemed to bind the parties, their officers, directors, agents, employees, successors and assigns, and all persons, firms and corporations acting under or for them. DATED: New Paltz, New York 1987 BY: THOMAS C. JORLING Commissioner New York State Department of Environmental Conservation PAUL D. KELLER Regional Director Region 3 TO: Town of Wappinger, Respondent P. O. Box 324 20 Middlebush Rd. Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 - 9 - CONSENT BY RESPONDENT Respondent hereby consents to the issuing and entering of this order, waives its rights to notice and hearing to the extent (provided herein, and agrees to be bound by the provisions, terms and conditions contained herein. TOWN OF WAPPINGER STATE OF COUNTY OF BY: TITLE• DATE• ss: On this day of , 1987, before me personally came to me known, who being by me duly sworn did depose and say that he resides in , that he is of, the Corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument, and that he signed his name as authorized by said Corporation. Notary Public =V= APPENDIX A PROPOSED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PROGRAM I) Borings and Groundwater Monitoring wells a. Proposed location based on surficial geology, topography, published information, fracture tracing, etc. b. Borings o borings for installation of peizometers and groundwater monitoring wells will have continuous split -spoon sampling during drilling with detailed boring logs utilizing the United Soil Classification System for field identification. o other borings shall have periodic split -spoon sampling (once every 5 feet and at each change in strata). C. Proposed design of Monitoring Wells o Couples/or clusters and piezometers o Materials o Locking mechanisms d. Proposed schedule of installation and monitoring o Timing for installation (5 day prior notice to DEC) o A proposed schedule for an initial round of sampling for all parameters listed on Attachment I, and for periodic sampling of appropriate parameters thereafter until such time as a different sampling regimen shall become effective under a permit or Closure Plan. II) Methods and scheduling for the determination of the aquifer characteristics, eg., pump test, in-situ permeability test. o Timing for testing (5 day prior notice to DEC) III) Proposed geophysical surveys and their approximate locations in order to help better define the subsurface conditions (if applicable). IV) Site specifics o Location of surface waters o Monitoring of surface waters V) A schedule for carrying.out the PSIP. The PSIP may be implemented in phases. VI) Names, certifications, and scope of services provided a. Engineering/Geological Consultant(s) b. Subcontractors (well driller, analytical laboratories) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation - Bureau.of Municipal Waste Water Quality Analysis Protocol 1. 2. 3. 4. A complete Priority Pollutant Analysis Boron Total Kjeldehl Nitrogen (TKN,) Ammon7a j X X 30. Groundwater Leachate I Surface Water Baseline Routine I Baseline Routine X I X Leat 1. X Y- 1. X X X X X X rzlrered in the`fiei.a 5. 6. 7. 8. Nitrate BOD5 COD TOC X Q preservation; no ot:ner samaies should X X I X X j X X X X X X X X 9_ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14_ 415- 16, TDS Sulfate Aluminum Chromium (Hexavalent) Sodium Detergent (MBAS) Calcium Alkalinity X i X X X X I X X X X X X I X j 2. Field measured.. I X X I X I ( X j I X I j X j X X X X 17. 18. 19. 20. Color j Odor ii Hardness (total) Chloride X j X X ! ?; X X # X X I X X X X X X X 21_ 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. Iron ( Manganese Dissolved Oxygen Specific Conductivity Total Volatile Solids 2 Static Water Level .in Wells ph, Eh ' 1 X X X X X j X ;' ' I X i X I X 1 X X j X X i X X X X } j X I X I X X X I X t X I Y 29. Turbidity I X j X X 30. Arsenic X I X X I 7: 31. Leat 1. X - 1. ^^ All samples for metals analysis should be rzlrered in the`fiei.a r.rior to preservation; no ot:ner samaies should be filtered. -- i. Lisced in the Federal Register Volume 45. No. 98. '.-!onday, Y:av 19. 198(; P42es 1357-1-1-177Q, including Metals, C_:anide, Total Phenols, Vo -lar--- ! e ComDounL_ , Acid Compounds and Pesticides. 2. Field measured.. 3. Leachate samDies only. tIla Dc� _. r.,, _n--. BLE: _-,i' Sa_ ^lin_ s:,r,La = = roricu,_:ea :ar Tr:,_ _C)LL. i APPENDIX B SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT (SIR) I) Hydrogeological Characteristics* a. Regional setting including a discussion of the bedrock and structural geology, glacial geology, and drainage basin characteristics. b. Identification of site specific conditions including the bedrock lithology, structured features, and unconsolidated materials. This is to be accompanied by detailed boring logs, rock core descriptions, where required by site conditions, and cross sections. c. Depth to bedrock and groundwaters, profiled and mapped referenced to mean sea level (MSL) d. Aquifer characteristics (see PSIP) o Direction of flow, horizontal and vertical o Confined/unconfined potentiometric surfaces o Recharge/discharge DEC may require submission of information on flow velocity, permeability, specific yield, transmissivity and geometric/geographic extent(s) if contravention of groundwater quality standards is indicated, or if a permit application is submitted. e. Static water levels and top of well casings elevations, dated, and referenced to MSL f. Monitoring well locations and well logs g. Background water quality established by upgradient well(s). h. Sampling results (dated) vis-a-vis 6NYCRR 703.5 (see analysis protocol) II) Site Characterization a. Topography b. Site size, property lines, limits of waste placement (dated) c. Proximity to surface waters and population centers III) Leachate Quantity and quality relative to treatment at conventional sewage treatment plants. * Groundwater modeling, if any, shall be compatible with IBM-PC XT with a DOS of 2.1 and submitted with report. APPENDIX C Closure Plan I. Within 120 days after notification by the Department, Respondent shall submit a Closure Plan which shall address but not be limited to: A. Schedule for site operation, Closure and Post Closure Activities B. Gas Venting C. Cover D. Final Grades and Subsequent Land Use E. Leachate Control F. Post Closure Care, Monitoring and Reporting G. Vector Abatement Program I. Certification II. Schedule of operation, Closure and Post Closure Care A. Scheduling of items IB through. II B. Scheduling for Post Closure Care III. Gas Venting A. Plan for determining the zone of zero gas migration B. Location and design of venting systems C. Schedule of installation and monitoring D. Gas diffusion (calculated) IV. Cover A. Quantity and source and scheduling of placement B. Testing Test ASTM Frequency Grain size D422 1,000 yd3 Moisture Content D698 1,000 yd Atterberg limits D423 -D424 5,000 yd (LL and PI) Clay Mineralogy 5,000 yd3 or change in material Capillary Head 1/acre 3 Moisture Density Curves 5,000 yd change in or material Moisture Density tests D2922 9/acre/lift Lab Permeability 5,000 yd change in or material Falling Head Permeability 1/acre The Density and Permeability testing of the borrow material at the lab should be done using a'5-15 blow compaction test. C. Additives used. D. Permeability requirements 1. 1x10-5 cm/sec if no contravention of 703.5 or Department of'He_�lth guidelines exists 2. 1x10 cm/sec if contravention exists E. Vegetation used. F. Calculations Parameter Method Runoff Curve Number Method Leachate quantity Water Balance Method Infiltration capacity Holton Equation Soil Loss (Water) Universal Soil Loss Equation* Soil Loss (Wind) Wind Erosion Equation* *if required by the Department V. Proposed Final Grades and Subsequent Land Use A. Slopes and Contours B. Slope Stability, i.e., maximum slope of IV on 311 or tiered per Solid Waste Management Facility Guidelines, 1481 C. Subsequent Land Use D. Surface drainage patterns and control VI. Leachate Control including but not limited to: A. Diversion Ditch - design and location B. Toe Drain - design and location C. Leachate impoundments D. Leachate Disposal Facility and Part 364 permits VII. Vector Abatement Program A. Schedule of operation and post closure care B. Materials used C. Subcontractor used D. Methods used VIII. Post Closure Care Monitoring and Reporting A. Erosion control and remediation B. Leachate control system maintenance C. Gas monitoring and system maintenance quarterly and D. Groundwater and Surface Water monitoring q er appendix B annually based on the results of the monitoring P E. Reporting - annually: vector abatement, monitoring, maintenance reports IX. Certification All construction shall be certified by a professional engineer, registered to practice engineering in the state of New York. PAGGI & MARTIN Consultliig Engineers & Land Sunoqars 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914-471-7 898 aIII co # timm= Z , mlsrjfj� MH99� October 8, 1990 Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill 1 Dear Board Members: This letter is written to inform you of the progress made, and the outstanding items that need to be addressed to formalize closure of the Castle Point Landfill. The following is a list of formal closure procedures that have been or will need to be completed prior to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation acceptance: 1. Order on Consent The procurement of a New York State DepartIlLent of Environmental Conservation Order on Consent is necessary to begin formal closure procedures. Said Order on Consent imposes a legal obligation on the Town to close the landfill, and will permit the Town to apply for Environment Quality Bond Act (EQBA) financial assistance. This item was completed on October 5th, 1987, when the Town executed said Order on Consent, and returned it to the New York State Department of Environmental of Conservation. October 8, 1990 Page Two Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill 2. Proposed Subsurfac e Investigation «• The Town must submit for approval a Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program (PSIP) to determine compliance or capability of compliance, with 6NYCRR Sections 360.8 and 703.5, and the Standards of Part 257 of 40 CFR (Open Dump Inventory). The purpose of the Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program is to provide information to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation so that they can determine the nature and extent, if any, of groundwater contamination caused by the landfill. Said information shall include: a Site Plan showing the location of proposed monitoring wells; boring methodology; design Of wells; proposed well materials; schedule of installation and monitoring; parameters for initial baseline sampling as well as future periodic sampling; determination of aquifer characteristics; scope of services by the Engineer, well driller and laboratory; a schedule for Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program implementation; and any site specific information deemed necessary by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, The Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program must be submitted within 150 days of receipt of the New York State Department of Envir.onmental Conservation request to do SO. I October 8, 1990 Page Three Town of Wappi I nger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill The Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program is Presently being completed by this office. We are still awaiting receipt of proposals by the well driller and laboratory, detailing the proposed scope of their services. once these items are received the Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program will be submitted to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 3. Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program ImpLementation The Town must, upon New York State Department of Environmental Conservation approval, implement the components of the Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program. 4. Subsurface Investigation Report The Town musL submit for aper ova! a Subs -'-rface Investigation Report (SIR) to determine compliance with 6NYCRR Sections 360.8 and 703.5, and the Standards of Part 257 of 40 CFR (Open Dump Inventory). The information submitted with the Subsurface Investigation Report shall include: regional hydrogeological characteristics; identification of site specific conditions; depth to bedrock and groundwater; aquifer characteristics; well casing elevation and static water levels; monitoring well locations and logs; background water quality testing results; sampling results; site plan with physical'site characteristics; leachate quantity and quality information; and any other information the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation deems necessary. October 8, 1990 Page Four Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill The Subsurface Investigation Report shall be submitted to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation within 210 days of receipt of the Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program approval notice. 5. Subsurface investigation Report Supplementary If deemed necessary, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation may require additional information or expansion on any information relative to the Subsurface Investigation Report, 6. Notice of Compliance or Non -Compliance Subsequent to an approved Subsurface Investigation Report review the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation shall notify the,Town whether or not the facility is in compliance with the rules and regulations stipulated in the Order on Consent. 7. Closure The Town must submit for approval a Landfill Closure Plan. The Closure Plan shall include the following information: schedule for site -operation including post -closure activities; gas venting; cover; final grades and subsequent land use; leachate control; post - closure monitoring and reporting; vector abatement Program; and all necessary certifications. The Closure Plan must be submitted within 120 days of receipt of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Notice of compliance or non-compliance. Upon receipt of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation approval of the Closure Plan, the Town must carry out the proposal in compliance with the approved schedule. October 8, 1990 Page Five Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill Tn addition, within 30 days of receipt of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Notice of compliance or non-compliance, the Town must notify the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation of its intentions for future solid waste disposal. 8. Environmental QualitY,Bond Act The Town of Wappinger intends to apply for State assistance in closing the Castle Point Landfill under the Environmental Quality Bond Act (EQBA) Program (6NYCRR Subpart 360-9, effective September 1st, 1990), Said assistance provides eligible municipalities with a maximum of either 500 of the approved project cost or $ 2 million to help pay for municipal landfill closures. A brief outline of the EQBA procedure is as follows: A. Determination of Application Eligibility An eligible municipality must meet the following requirements: site is municipally owned,'and municipality has full control of all closure and Post -closure activities; site is not Registry Classification 1 or 2;4and sites registered as classification 2A can receive assitance only if the municipality submits a complete re-classification plan to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. October 8, 1990 Page Six Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfi.11 B. Application Procedure A New York State Department of Environmental Conservation application must be submitted along with the following items: closure investigation report; a legail obligation to close the landfill (ie: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Order on Consent); a landfill closure project work plan; authorization for Town to submit the application; landfill classification; an affirmative action work plan; a commitment that another landfill will not be constructed over the landfill to be closed; information regarding post - closure monitoring and maintenance; and all information required so that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation may rate the landfill closure importance according to its point system. C. New York Stat --e Department of Environmental Conservation Review The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation will review the application for completeness, and to determine the Town's score according to its point system. Said point system is used by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to determine the order in which it will review and approve applications for State assistance, October 8, 1990 Page Seven Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill D. Eligible and Ineligible Costs Costs for the following items are eligible for State Assistance: preparation of a closure investigation report; preparation of a reclassification investigation if applicable; engineering and architectural services; preparation of plans and specifications; consultant services; legal services; closure construction; and other New York State Department of Environmental Conservation approved direct capital expenses. The following #ems are not eligible for State assistance: costs to,perform the municipal landfill closure project if not fully implemented in accordance with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation approved plans and reports; costs for preparing and submitting an application under Title 5 of Article 54 of the E.C.L; costs for which the Commissioner determines funds are nct available; post -closure ELorritoring and maintenance costs; costs for development of alternative waste disposal sites or techniques; Cost incurred before January 8th, 1986; costs for closure of a Registery Classification 1 or 2 landfill; costs inconsistent with or in violation of Title 5 or Article 54 of the ECL; costs which do not comply with the landfill closure requirement for new facilities as set forth in Part 360 of 6NYCRR Subpart 360-9; costs for which Federal or other specific assistance has or will be received; and costs for activities not approved by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. October 8, 1990 Page Eight Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention; Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill E. Progress Reviews and Reimbursement Schedules The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation shall have jurisdiction governing all progress reviews and reimbursement schedules. F. State Assistance Contract Upon application approval, the Town must enter into a contact with the Commissioner in a timely fashion. Said contract shall include the following: provisions for project implementation; provisions for reimbursement; provisions relating to competitive bidding procedures, protests, awarding of contracts, pre -construction conferences, charge orders, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation inspections, inspections of record, audits, force accounts, construction schedules, project management, progress reports, Minority and Women's Business Enterprises and Equal Oppertunity requirements; state assistance fund retainage; and post -closure monitoring and maintenance; a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation approved current cost estimate for the project; and the maximum total state assistance which may be awarded for the project. October 8, 1990 Page Nine Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Landfill Closure Procedures Castle Point Landfill G. Return of State Assistance for Non -Performance The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation shall have jurisdiction governing the return of State Assistance for non-performance, if any. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact this office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, Joseph E. Pz,ggi. Jr., P.F. JL-P/PJP:nar CC: Al Roberts, Town Attorney PAGGI & MARTIN Consulting Engineers & Larid Surz-evors 54-56 NVlain Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 93-X71-;9$ January 10, 1991 Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, New York 1.2590 Attention: Constance Smith Town Supervisor Reference: Proposed Subsurface Investigation Plan Castle Point Landfill Dear Board Members: Enclosed, piease_nd si:c (6) copies of our responses to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation review of the Proposed Subsurface investigation Plan (PSIP) for the Castle Point Landfill Closure Program. Upon approval by the New York State Department of Environmental. Conservation the Town will have 210 days to implement the terms of the Proposed Subsurface Investigation Pian and prepare a Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) outlining the findings of the PSIP. Since the review process is proceeding rapidly, it is the opinion of this office, that the Town should request final cost estimates from CAMO Laboratories, the proposed contractor, and begin fund allocation procedures. Please keep this office informed of your decisions on this matter. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please feel free to contact this office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly y, urs, rp ` Joseph E. Paggi, P.E JEP/PJP:nar Encl. C--,. Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk Albert Roberts, Esq. JoscphE.Paggi,Jr.,P.E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P,E., L.S. R C IV ED JAN 1 4.1991 ELAINE SNOWDEN TOWN CLERK PAGGI & MARTIN C'ansultin,K En,YIneers & Land ,Sur-Eyrvnrs 54-56 iNfain Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 QI4-471-7898 January 10, 1991 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 Attention: Lawrence Gallagher Reference: Castle Point Landfill Town of Wappinger Dutchess County, New York Dear Larry: Please be advised that -his office has received your review letter on the Proposed Subsurface Investigation Plan (PSIP) for the Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. Subsequent to consultation with CAMO Laboratories and Andrews Welldrilling, Inc., the following are our responses to your review. comments: 1. A hydrogeologist shall be present during all monitoring well installation procedures. All borings shall be logged using the Unified Soil Classification System. 2. The bentonite pellet seal shall be two (2) feet in thickness. The annulus shall be sealed using the Tremie method. 3. Well development shall be accomplished by means of mechanical surging with a surge block assembly, with subsequent well water evacuation through the use of Teflon bailers. The exact procedures proposed are detailed in the accompanying correspondence from CAMO Laboratories. a. The bedrock lithology shall be determined by means of a rock drill with core sample retrieval. The core sample shall be analyzed by a hydrogeologist. Joxph E. Paggi, jr., P.E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P.S., L.S. January 10, 1991 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 Attention: Lawrence Gallagher Reference: Castle. Point Landfill Town of Wappinger Dutchess County, New York 5. zt appears as if two separate flow regimes (ie: local and regional) could exist at the Castle Point Site. The installation of the proposed monitoring wells and subsequent qualitative testing, will allow determination of the existence (it any) of separate local and regional aquifers, the direction of flow in all water bearing strata, and the contravention (if any) of groundwater standards. The placement of additional monitoring wells in an easter-ly-direction from the proposed wells can,be implemented, if required, to further detail the interaction of the groundwater flaw regimes, and to pin point the local/regional divide. If groundwater standards are contravened, the local/regional divide, if any, will be located and wells will be installed for the purpose of long term monitoring. The characteristics of the existing subsurface conditions, as well as the necessity for any additional exploration will be better determined subsequent to the installation of the proposed monitoring wells. 6. If groundwater standards are contravened, the Town will undertake a sampling of nearby (ie: }1/2 mile) private wells. January 10, 1991 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 Attention: Lawrence Gallagher Reference: Castle Point Landfill Town of wappinger Dutchess County, New York t you `:ave any fur -ler ques-�_cns, or requi-- ary _..-Ur.7a i-cn, _lease -ee_ _re@ ?hank you for your conszderation in this matter. Ver truly v rs, r'Jose E. JEP/2JP:nar Encl. cc: Town Board Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk Albert Roberts, Esq. CAMO LABORATORIES A DIVISION OF CAMO POLLUTION CONTROL, INC. POUGHKEEPSIE AREA FACILITY! CAMO LABORATORY 367 VIOLET AVENUE POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12601 (914) 473-9200 FAX 914-473.1962 Decamher 26, 1990 Paggi & tlartin 54-56 Mair. Street Poughkeepsie, New York 1601 Dear Peter:., Enclosed is a proposed well development procedure for your approval. Please advise if this is acceptable to the Department of Environmental Conservation. We can :Hake ;whatever changes are necessary. Sincerely, Glen Morris Vics President gm/mJ Enclosure Complete Laboratory Facilities for Wastewater, Water and Air analysis ,Vew York State Department of Health Approved Connecticut Certified STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NEW 2 INCH DIAMETER GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELDS. 1. Determine depth of well, static water level and screened location(s). 2. Connect surge block to PVC. (Note: Surge Block should be soaked thoroughly in D.I. water prior to use) 3. Lower surge block to depth of screen. Mark PVC at level Jt 'ae__ casi1 u to indicat2 l� _ ^1^ �e� L 10Wi1Wn 7r•15 Thrust surge block assemijiy up and down __. -he well repeatedly and quickly. The resulting increase in pressure and alternate vacuum will redistribute fines and gravel surrounding the screen for maximum yield. 5. Repeat procedures 3 & 4 at each screen dept interval. 6. Using Teflon Bailers, remove well water as quickly as passible. Empty bailers into a calibrated container and use stopwatch to determine flow rate_ 7. Continue until visual appearance indicates removal of solids and "fines" materials from well. am�F POLLUTION CONTROL, INC. �w Operation of Water and Wastewater Treatment Systems "Complete Analytical Testing Capabilities/NEW YORK STATE APPROVED LABORATORY" 367 VIOLET AVENUE POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y, 12601 March 4, 1991 (914) 473.9200 FAX 914.473.1962 Paggi & Martin 54 -- 56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 ATTN: Jay Paggi RE: Castle Point Proposal Revised March 4, 1991 Dear Jay, In 1987 CAMO Laboratories provided the Town a cost of $16,424 to provide (5) monitoring wells and required sampling at the Castle Point Landfill. Per your request in your January 29th letter, CAMO Laboratories has updated the cost as result of changes in scope per Department of Environmental Conservation approvals. CAMO Laboratories will maintain its 1987 costs however the costs will, increase as a result of the fallowing changes in scope: ITEM #1: The original scope of work did not include wells being installed into bedrock. The additional costs are as follows: TmmUT. OnQT A. N.X. Core Drilling and sample retrieval @ $100 per foot x assume 5 ft. = $500 per well x 5 wells $2,500.00 B. 6 1/4 open rock drill @ $25 per foot x assume 5 €t. = $125 per well x 5 wells $ 625.00 C. Cluster piezometers if necessary @ $32.50 per foot assume 50 ft. x 5 wells $ 8125.00 TOTAL ITEM #1 COST: $11,250.00 ITEM #2: The changes in scope resulted in a sixth well. This well requires same specifications for drill and laboratory analysis as previous 5 wells. A. Cost for drilling well assuming 50 ft. depth $4,475.00 B. Cost for collection and analysis of one sample $1,100.00 TOTAL ITEK #2 co6T: $5,575.00 ITEM #3: Changes in scope will require a hydrologist present. CAMO recommends the town hire the hydrologist under a separate agreement. Attachment B is a proposal of costs. SUMMARY OF COSTS 1987 Original Proposal - $16,424.00 Change in Scopy Item #1 - $11,250.00 Change in Scope Item #2 - $ 5,575.00 Change in -Scope -Item #3 -- TOTAL COST: - $33,244.00 As you can see, these costs are based on assumptions for well depths, bedrock depths and need for cluster piezometers. In attachment A I have outlined all the unit costs. It should also be noted in the D.E.C. comments it indicated that pending location of ground water two samples per well may have to be collected. Our costs are based on one sample per well. Each additional sample will be at a cost of $1,100 per sample. If you have further questions or wish to discuss this matter any further, I can be reached at 473--9200. Yours truly, Richard Gerbes Account Executive RG/ar526 ATTACHMENT A UNIT COSTS 6 1/4 augering and split spoon sampling @ $50.00/foot N.X. Core Drilling in Bedrock @ $100.00/foot Materials for 2" PVC Piezometer @ $30.00/foot 6 1/4 Rock Drilling @ $25.00/fo6t Extra Piezometer @ $32.50/foot MAR -01-1991 14:36 FROM THE CHAZEN COMPANIES TO 4731362 P.01 CHAZEN ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, T I r I I One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12$0.3 TEL: (914) 454-6910 FAX; (914) 454-0104 Mr. Richard Gerbds CRMO Laborewries, Inc 367 Violet Avenue Poughkeepsie, New York 1601 Re: Castle Point Landfill SIR Proposal Dear Rich: March 1, 1991 F A x T A/ N S M I T T A L M E M a TO: VIC44 -C-6156�— HI 0 PAX M.- !�t -(Q pan FROM71 (CM& PHONE: 45'(- 6004 - CO: Ce5 FAX;a•'01C";L� I ftsvitloramd fax IransmIM memo 7671 Madwed, as requested you will find Chazen Environmental Services propose) for the Castle Point Landfill Sub Surface investigation Report. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this proposal. Thank you &VvetruIy yours, W'Uyyou . ' "9 Timothy G.44elling, Director, Chazen Enuironmental Seruims MAR -01-1991 14:38 FROM THE CHAZEN COMPANIES TO 4731962 P.02 SUBMITTED MARCH 1, 1991 CASTLE POINT LANDFILL SUBSURFACE LWESTIGATIONREPORT PROPOSAL objective The objective of this proposal is to amist Camo Laboratories, Paggi and Martin Consulting Engineers and Andrews Well Drilling Inc. in the preparation a Subsur&oe Investigation Report (SIR) for submission to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation QMDEC) in accarda-nee with the Proposed Subsurfkcs Investigation Program (PSIP) dated October 23,1990. The costa of the to dal outHred below are estimated in the enclosed table. However, due to the variable nature of the sites geology and the potential for contacting different aquifers and groundwater divides the actual Costs will be billed on a time and materials basin following the attached fee schedule. The tasks required to accomplish this objective are detailed in the following work pha. Aquifer characteristics may be obtained by an alternate method other than specified in the PSIP. This method aIlowe the ch=cteristics to be determined without having to pump and possibly contain and treat the well water, WORK PIAN L Geologlo Lagging The on-site geologist shall provide borehole logging and interpretation of unconsolidated sediment nmplws drill cuttings, and drilling Progress. No drilling fluids -other than water from a tested source will be employed in the drilling operation without prior euthw ization fix= NYBDEC personnel. The on-site geologist shall also maintain a log of each boring including but not limited to: Reference point for all depth measuremeuts. The depth at which each change of formation occurs. . Identification and ClassWeation of formation materials using the Unified Soil Clawdflmtion Vst= for unconsolidated sediment samples. The number, interval, and time of sample collection. Identifimtion of the bedrock type, fracture frequency and weathered zones by the examination of rock cores if taken. Description of drMiag progress. The number and time of each core run. Estimated water level, yield and recovery rate. 46 MAR -01-1991 14:39 FROM THE CHAZEN COMPANIES TO 4731962 P.03 • Cartk Pzat SZR Pro The OVA reading, in parts/millioon, of each sample as logged at the time of drilling. M Site Safety and Air Monitoring The on-site geologist will be safety trained under OSHA standards 1910.120 and wM act as the site safety offu er. The PSIP "Site Safety Plan" will be fled out and utilized as needed during the investigation. The geologist will perform air quality monitoring during drMing Ding both a portable Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) and a Combustible Gas Indicator (CGI). All samples will �9 monitored at the time of drilling using the OVA and say responses will be noted in the boring logs. If levels of 6 parts per =Mon (ppm) organic vapor or grcnter are measured in the air surrounding the well head during drilling, development or sampling, all personnel working in the area will be required to weer (OSHA) Level C personal protoctive equipment. This equipment includes air purifying organic vapor respirators and will be worn by personnel worldug in the area until the level is the air is below 5 ppm. Readings from the CGI will also be poriodically recorded in the field notes or drilling log. If significant levels are found, an additional study will be implemented to locate the source of the pi and determine what measures, if any. can be taken to vent the soil gas. If gas levels in the air surrounding the well head reach or exceed 25% of the Trower Explosive Limit (LEL) the area will be iaanrediAtely evacuated until the levels are lowered. In this event, the Town and proper =107 agencies will be notMed imm&diatcly and a separate plan of action will be created. llt. Optional Hydrnultc Well Testing All of the monitor wells will be tested to determine the hydraulic conductivity of'the formation in which they are completed. This analysis will be accomplished by installing a down -hole pressure transducer c nnoctsd to a field data acquisition unit, then performing slug/bail tests. The data oollested from this unit wM be tran.s&rred to a computer and "Wed. The saturated bydranlie conductivity values of the geologic formations tested will be reported in units of centimoite s per second. These nnolryscs will help determine groundwater flow charaemistics underlying the site. M. Report Preparation The following information will be placed on a suitably scaled site base map for inclusion into the Subsnrlace investigation Report (SIR) Dirtetion of Groundwater Flow Areas of Groundwater Recharge and Discharge Depth to Bedrock Geologic Cross -Fe on Lines Geologic Cross -Sections Weil Loge and Completion Diagrams Hydraulic Conductivity Data MAR -91-1991 14:4e FROM THE C-kAZEN COMPANIES TO 4731962 P.04 . .• , L+asllePoint Land/t!I BIR Prvoosal CHAZEM ENMONMENTAL SERVICES CASTLE POINT LANDFILL INVESTIGATION TOWN OF WAPPMERS FEBRUARY199I SCIEDULE DFFEES PERSONNEL Principal.. ................. „ ................ ............................ ................ ..»............. NN...................... g95.00/F� Engiaeer .... ............ ........... ..»..-............ ._........................ ..„„............ u....................................... $70.00 Sr,Geologist....... ................. ................ ............. ..... .......... „......... .....................N................ ........ ;80.UU%HK Geologist........................................... ........................ ................................... .............................„. g"a6.00/HR Jr. Geolo& ......................................................................................................... ........N........,.. $46.00/HR TechnicianL..N...........................................:......N„......................... 128.00/m CADDTaftspersoII..u„„„N„...u„.......Nu..u.N..u....................... NNw.......a..NN..HN..N..•N.NNu.. u..uu �.YVI a.ay Clerical..........................„........... ..... ..... ........................ N..NN....-........_..„......»..NN....::..::N �2b.00/FDi Survey Crew (3 person) ..................... N....... „..... ............... _.u.......... .................. ...�..........-....„. Sj;126.00/HR Personnel charges (such as telephone, poffwge, or facsimiles) incurred in the performance of the wort shall be billed to the project without manic -up. DMF.(,`1' COSTS Direct costs we in addition to permanel charges and include expenditareamade in the interest of the projects as listed below. • Reproducdcm of reports, druwinge, photocopies and blueprints ■ Messenger and axgress vervic a deliveries. Travel, tolls and overnight expenses. Automobiles we will be charged at $0.276 per mane. • Maps, photographs, ordi.nanoes, plana and other documents directly related to attd necessary to complete contractual obligations. MAR -01-1991 1448 FROM THE CHAZEN COMPANIES TO 4731962 P.05 CdOU0 pow us 4 S MCONTB.ACTQRS Subcontractors work will be billed at actual costa plus 10% BILLING Projwt costs will be billed monthly, payable net 30 datiyL Delinquent payments will be assessed a 1.5% per month fence charge. SPECIAL NOTE Surcharge for level C protectiou.......................»..................»».......»......»..........»..»..».2S'b of labor costs Surcharge for Level S protscdon............. »....... »....................»............,......................» 100% of labor costs EQUUINFNT The foIIowing equipment rates shall apply • Pump package used for the development and sampling of monitoring wells and for, low volume pump Nests. Includcs: Track and Generator/batteries Pumps (submersible, nitrapt, or peristaltic) Haws and Meters (pH, Gond. temp., M-scope) .......»....»,..........».......»................................................................»..............»....»»........... $95/3)AY • Steam cleaning package used to deoonteminate equipment between Wells and between sites. includes; Steam cleaner, Generator and Hoses . Hydraulic conductivity analysis equipment Includes: Pressure transducer, data logger and field computer ...»..»,...».»....»»..........................»,.....».................................»»............................ , $95/DAY Cvutinuorue water level recorder...............................»»,..............................»».....--- =/DAY Combustible Gas Indicator..............................«»N»»........................»..»..............».»....» /DAY HNi] meters.....».»..»»..u..»ru.......»..............u...».. ..---..................»..Nry..N»»I$79/DAY MAR -01-1991 14:41 FROM THE CHAZEN COMPANIES TO 4731962 P.06 lk March 7, 1991 Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Box 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Proposed Subsurface Investigation Report Implementation Castle Point Landfill Page Two 4. If the Town applies for state aid under the EQBA Landfill Closure Program the formal closure procedures would differ from the above flow chart as follows: A. An EQBA application can not be submitted until the closure plan is in final approved (or at least approvable) form. B. The existing Consent Order is not in approvable form under EQBA guidelines. If state aid is sought, a new Consent Order must be executed. This new Consent Order would be binding superseding all provisions of the existing Consent Order. C. At the present time, the landfill is obligated to close according to the provisions of the existing Consent Order. In order to qualify for EQBA aid, the landfill must be closed in compliance with 6NYCRR - Part 360, and any additional provisions contained within the new Consent Order. March 7, 1991 Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Box 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Proposed Subsurface Investigation Report Implementation Castle Point Landfill Page Three D. It is our recommendation that the decision on whether or not to pursue EQBA aid, should not be made until the SIR is completed. If the results of the SIR reveal no contravention of groundwater quality, then it would probably not be cost effective to pursue EQBA aid. Enclosed for your review and approval is an estimate to perform the proposed PSIP implementation, prepared by CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Said estimate includes both the original 1987 quote, as well as estimates for changes in the scope of work that are required to satisfy Department of Environmental Conservation concerns. Change Item No. 1 is for additional costs for drilling the wells into bedrock, bedrock sampling and clustering the piezometers. Change Item No. 2 is for additional costs to install a sixth monitoring well. As per the meeting with the Department of Environmental Conservation of this date, this sixth well will no longer be necessary for PSIP implementation. Change Item No. 3 is for additional costs required to enlist the services of a hydrogeologic consultant. It should be noted that this estimate makes certain assumptions (ie 50' well depth, cluster piezometers in each well). These assumptions generally represent a "worst case" scenario. Actual costs will be determined by field conditions, and will be paid for at the approved unit cost prices. Please review all enclosed items to see if they meet with your approval. As we are operating under a strict time schedule, your expeditious response would be greatly appreciated. We will await your direction on how you wish to proceed in this matter. March 7, 1991 Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Box 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Proposed Subsurface Investigation Report Implementation Castle Point Landfill Page Four If you have any questions or require additional information, feel free to contact this office. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. JEP:nar Encl. cc: Michael Tremper PAGGI & MARTIN Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914-471-7898 April 23, 1991 Mike Tremper Camo Pollution Control 367 Violet Avenue Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Reference: Castle Point Landfill Dear Mike: At the April 22, 1991 Planning Board meeting authorization was give to start the work of the Castle Point Landfill. As you know, this work is being done to prepare the Subsurface Investigation Report that must be submitted to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation by August of this year. Please start this work immediately and keep Peter Paggi in my office involved. Thank you for your time and cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. JEP:Iaw cc: Town Board Peter Paggi 86-003(14) Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P. E. Ernst tM2rtin, Jr., P.E„ L.S. rr+ i PAGGI & MARTIN Consulting Engifteers & Land Surveyors 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914-471-7 898 RECEIVE,) May 8, 1991 MAY 15 1992 Town of Wappinger TOWN ELAINE SNlVOp W N 20 Middlebush Road Wappinger Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Anne Buckley, Comptroller Reference: Castle Point Landfill Dear Anne: Enclosed is an April 24th, 1992 Voucher from CRMO Laboratories for baseline sampling at the above referenced site. This office has reviewed the request and recommend that payment be made in the Voucher amount of $ 1,074.00. By copy of this letter, I am also transmitting the baseline sampling results to the Town Board for their review. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, �0 Joseph E. Paggi Jr., P.E. JEP:nar cc: Town Board w/Baseline Sampling Results "2 _q t// vk 7--- Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P. E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P.E., L.S. 9 CAMO LABORATORIES, INC 367 VIOLET AVENUE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 (914) 473-9200 FED. I.D. #14-1725654 NYS LAB ID NO.: 10310 Mr. Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin 54-56 Main St. Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Project ID: Castle Point Landfill Analytical Report Date Samples Collected: 3/31/92 Date Samples Received: 4/01/92 Samples Collected By: Chazen. Env. Ser. Samples Delivered By: Chazen Env. Ser. Matrix: Groundwater Date of Invoice: P.O. #: Typed by: Invoice #: 4/24/92 kag 92-04-1791 Sample Identification (01) PMW-7 Unit/ Parameters Measure (01) NYSDEC Baseline Water Quality Scan Analysis Comments: * See attached tables. Comments: All samples will be discarded after twenty-one ays or EPA Holding time, whichever is shorter, unless lwedare notified otherwise. Hazardous waste samples will be returned to client. Analytical Methods: All analytical methods comply with those specified in APHA "Standard Methods" and/or EPA approved methods. Laboratory Director John F. Eisenhardt cc: Mr. Tim Wellin V Cfiazen Environmental Services P.O. Box 3470 Manchester Rd. Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 CAMO LOG NO,: 92-04-1791 NYSDEC BASELINE WATER QUALITY I� ----------------------------------------------------- SAMPLE ID ' PARAMETERS !i (01) PMW-7 = PH (Std.) ii 5.8 C------------------------------------ „--------------- eH(millivolts) ;; 401 j------------------------------------ I i -----__-------- I i BOD I I < A I , 7 4 � ------------------------------------ � �--------------- I TDS C1 174 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------------; Alkalinity (as CaCO (3)) ;I 16 ------------------------------------ --------------- I Color (Pt/Co) 5 ------------------------------- j = ---- Odor (TON ;; 1 ------------------------------------ --------------- 1 Turbidity (NTU) ;; 0.27 ' ------------------------------------ „---------------' Sulfate ;; 70 ------------------------------------ -__-------------' MEAS ,i 0.20 --------,---------------------------- --------------- Boron ------ ------Boron 0.4 ' r ------------------------------------ ----------------t I Ammonia ; <.0.3 --------------------- ------------- -- -------------- Nitrate 0.04 ----------------------------------------------------- NOTE: All results expresseed in mq/L unless otherwise noted CAMO LOG NO.: 92--04-1791 NYSDEC BASELINE WATER QUALITY ii _ SAMPLE ID i PARAMETERS ;; (01) 11 PMW-7 TKN ii <0.2 ------------------------------------ ---------------I 1 Chloride 9 ------------------=------------------ ---------------- Cyanide ;; <0.02 I------------------------------------„--------------- ; Total Phenol <0.01 ------------------------- ----- I I --------------- TOC ------ -----TOC 11 1.3 ------------------------------------;;--------------- COD H <5 ------------------------------------ ---------------- I Hexavalent Chromium ii <0.05 ' ------------------------------------ ;;---------------' , Hardness (as(CaCO(3)) 77 j ------------------------------------ � � ------------ 7-- I I Calcium 11 21 I ------------------------------------ii---------------I Magnesium ;; 6 -----------------------=------------11---------------' I Iron ;_ <0.05 ----------------------- ---- ---------.;,---------------I Manganese 11 0.02 I------------------------------------11--------------- Sodium --------- ---Sodium 11 4 , ------------------------------------ I I --- ------ Aluminum 11 <0;1 ----------------------------------------------------- NOTE: All results expresseed in mg/L unless otherwise noted CRMO LOG NO.: 92-04-1791 PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS -------------------------------------------------------- _ SAMPLE ^---- ID ' PARAMETERS (01) J PMW-7 c ;Unfiltered; Filtered Antimony ; <0.06 ; (0.06 I ' i It Arsenic ; <0.005 ; (0.005 I I I Beryllium ; (0.005 ; <0.005 Cadmium ; (0.005 ; (0.005 Chromium <0.01 ; <0.01 1 Copper ; <0.1 ; <O.l ; I Lead 1 I ' (0.005 I i ; <0.005 Mercury ; <0.0002 ; <0.0002 ; Nickel ; <0.05 i <0.05 Selenium. ; <0.005 ; (0..005 Silver ; <0.01 ; I (0.01 Thallium i <0.01 ' ; I <0.01 Zinc ; <0.1 ; <0.1 -------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless noted otherwise. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Laboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 1791-01 Client Name: Paggi & Martin Date Collected: 3/31/92 Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Landfall Date Received: 4/01/92 Sample Location: PMW-7 Date Analyzed: 4/03/92 Matrix: Water Method: EPA 624 Date Reported: 4/24/92 Detection Sample Limit Conc. COMPOUND (ug/L) (ug/L) Q Chloromethane 10.0 ; I U I Bromomethane 1.0.0 I ; U I Vinyl Chloride ; 10.0 ; ; U Chloroethane 10.0 i U Methylene Chloride 5.0 i U Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 Z ; U Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene ; 5.0 ; - U 1,1-Dichloroethene ; 5.0 ; ; U 1,1-Dichloroethane5.0 U Dichlorodifluoromethane ; 5.0 = I U Chloroform ; 5.0 I ; U 1,2-Dichloroethane 1 5.0 ; I U 2-Chlor6ethylvinyl Ether ; 10.0 ; ; U 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane I 5.0 ; U Carbon Tetrachloride ; 5.0 ; U Bromodichloromethane ; 5.0 ; U 1,2-Dichloropropane ; 5.0 ; ; U cis-1,3-Dichloropropene i 5.0 ; ; U Trichloroethene 5.0 ; U Dibromochloromethane ; 5.0 ; ; U 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 5.0 ; U Benzene I 5.0 U trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 5.0 ; ; U Bromoform I 5.0 ; ; U Tetrachloroethene ; 5.0 U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane I 5.0 ; ; U Toluene p 5.0 I ; U Chlorobenzene ; 5.0 ; U Ethylbenzene ; 5.0 ; ; U Acrolein I 100.0 I I U 'Acrylonitrile 100.0 ; U 11 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS Laboratory Name: CARO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 1191-01 CIient Name: Paggi & Martin Date Collected: 3131/92 Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Landfill Date Received: 4/01/92 Sample Location: PRN -7 Date Extracted: 4/02/92 Matrix: Nater Date Analyzed: 4/21/92 Method: EPA 625 Date Reported: 4/24/92 Detection Sample Detection Sample Limit Conc. Limit Conc. COMPOUND (ug/L) (ug/LI Q COMPOUND (ug/L) NO) Q bis(2-Chlaroethyl) ether I 10.0 I U 1 I 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ( 10.0 1 I U I 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene I 10.0 I ; U; I Phenanthrene 10.0 1 V I 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 1 10.0 1 1 U 1 1 Anthracene 10.0 ; ; U I Benzidine I 40.0 1 U! I Di-n-butylphthalate ; 10.D ; U I 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene I IO.D I U; I Fluoranthiene I 10.d ; I U 1 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine I 10.0 I ; U; I Pyrene I 10.0 ; 1 U bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether I 10.0 I ; U I ; Butylbenzylphthalate 10.0 I I U I M-Ritrosodzmethylamine 1 10.0 I U I 1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine i 20.0 I ; U H-Mitroso-di-a-propylamine 1 10.0 .1 I U I Benzo(a)anthracene ; IDA I U I Rexachloroethane 1 ID.0 I I U I I Chrysene 1 10.0 I I U Mitrobenzene 1 10.0 , I 1 U 1 I bis(2-6thylhexyl) phthalate I 10.0. I I U Isophorone I 10.0 ;. 1 U 1 I Di-n-octylphthalate I 10.0 I 1 U bis(2-Chloroethoxy) methane I 10.0. 1 1 U I 1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 1.0.0 ; ; U 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 10.0 I 1 U; 1 Benzo(k)fluaranthene I 10.0 I I U Naphthalene 1 10.0 I U I I Benzo(a)pyrene , I 10.D ; 1 U Bexachlorobutadiene ; 10.0 I 1 U 1 I Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene I 10.0 I I U Bexachlorocyclopentadiene I 10.0 I 1 U I 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ; 10.0 I I U 2-Chloronaphthalene I 10.0 ) U I ; Benzo(g,h,i}perylene 1 10.0 ; 1 U Dimethylphthalate 1 10.0 1 I U I 1 Phenol I 10.0 ; I U Acenapthtylene 1 10.0 ! 1 U; I 2-Mitrophenol 1 10.0 1 I U 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10.0 i 1 U 1 I 4-Nitrophenol 10.0 ! I U Rexachlorobenzene I 10.0 I I U I I 2,4-Dinitrophenol 50.0 ; ; U Ancenaphthene I 1010 I I U I ; 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 50.0 I U 2,4-Dinitrotaluene I 10.0 I I U I I Pentachlorophenol I 50.0 I I U Diethylphthalate I 10.0 I U 1 I p -Chloro -m -cresol I 10.0 1 I U 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 1 10.0 I 1 U; 1 2 -Chlorophenol I 10.0 ! I U Fluorene 1 10.0 I 1 U 1 I 2,4-Dichlorophenol ; 10.0 I 1 U N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 1 10.0 I 1 U I 1 2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol I 10.0 I I U ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 2,4-Diaethylphenol 1 10.0 I I U PESTICIDES I SAMPLE ID i PARAMETERS i------------� Laboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 1791-01 Client Name: Paggi & Martin Date Collected: 3/31/92 Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Landfill Date Received: 4/01/92 Sample Location: PMW-7 Date Extracted: 4/02/92 Matrix: Water Date Reported 4/24/982 ----------------------------------------------- SAMPLE ID i PARAMETERS i------------� I i (01) i I j I I - Endosulfan ; <0.05 1 I � I II - Endosulfan ; <0.10 p I Endosulfan Sulfate ; <0.10 a - BHC ; <0.05 b - BHC ; <0.05 J d - BHC <0.05 g - BHC <0.05 Aldrin <0.05 I ' t � Dieldrin i <0.10 4,4' -DDE i <0.10 � 1 I I 4,4' -DDD <0.10 f � ; 4,4' -DDT i <0.10 i f ' ! 1 Endrin ; <0.10 I _ ; Endrin Aldehyde i <0.10 f Heptachlor ; <0.05 I I Heptachlor Epoxide 1 <0.05 � I I Chlordane I 1 ; <0.5 � s f Toxaphene p ; <1.0----------------------------------------------- I NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. PCB Laboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 1791-01 Client Name: Paggi & Martin Date Collected: 3/31/92 Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Landfill Date Received: 4/01/92 Sample Location: PMW-7 Matrix: Water Date Reported 4/24/92 i e PARAMETERS ---------------------- 11 ; SAMPLE ID PMW-7 ' ' Aroclor 1016 � ; l <0.50 ' ' � 1 Aroclor 1221 ; <0.50 Aroclor 1232 ; <0.50 , ' � f ' � I Aroclor 1242 ; <0.50 ' � I Aroclor 1248 ; <0.50 Aroclor 1254 ; <0:50 ' Aroclor 1260 ; <0.50 ' ------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. co m r i V y Y N pas v O L7OA � � Y ,d Ea MY L a 09 V co m r i a ! O. N a co m r ri �1� co co 4 L 9 pa Y Q pUp�� 04 ti D o U Q t { O t• � 5 aC = ` 4� a H � d U ' L t 10f L w ri �1� co co $ N_ f ti o O t• � 5 aC = ` 4� a � � d •. ' L t a ri �1� co co fGIGI & MARTIN Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 54-56 Main Street POLIglikeer)sie, New York 12601 914-47 1-7 898 July 15, 1991 Town of wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Box 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Reference: Progress to Date Castle Point Landfill Dear Board Members: Enclosed, please find six (6) copies of a report outlining the progress to date in the matter of the closing of the Castle Point Landfill. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, Peter J. Paggi for Paggi and Martin PJP:nar cc: Albert Roberts., Esq. Ann Buckley w/Original Vouchers Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., 1'. E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P,E_ L.S. PROGRESS TO DATE IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED CASTLE POINT LANDFILL CLOSURE JULY 15, 1991 PREPARED BY: PAGGI AND MARTIN 5456 MAIN STREET POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 RECEIVED J U L 18 1991 ELAINE SNOWDEN TOWN CLERK TABLE OF CONTENTS WELLDRILLING SERVICE PROVIDED TO DATE GEOLOGIC SERVICE PROVIDED TO DATE ESTIMATED PROJECT COST VS COST TO DATE REMAINING WORK APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D Page 1 - 4 5 5 6 - 7 CAMO VOUCHER JUNE 28TH, 1991 CHAZEN VOUCHER JUNE 17TH, 1991 CHAZEN WELL DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE, DATED JULY 1ST, 1991 CORRESPONDENCE FROM CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, DATED MAY 31ST, 1991 CAMO.VOUCHER. PMW-1: Drilling began on May 28th, 1991 and was abandoned the same day when auger refusal was encountered at a depth of five (5) feet. A May 31st, 1991 meeting between Lawrence Gallagher of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Tim Welling of Chazen Environmental Services concluded that we should cease drilling at this site since we experienced auger refusal before groundwater was encountered. * Final Cost: o Auger with split -spoon sampling: 5 Feet @ $ 50.00/Foot = $ 250.00 PMW-2: Drilling began on May 24th, 1991 and was abandoned the same day when auger refusal was encountered at a depth of fourteen (14) feet. A May 31st, 1991 meeting between Lawrence Gallagher of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Tim Welling of Chazen Environmental Services concluded that we should cease drilling at this site since we experienced auger refusal before groundwater was encountered. * Final Cost: o Auger with split -spoon sampling: 14 Feet @ $ 50.00/Foot = $ 700.00 - 1 - PMW-3: Drilling began and was completed on May 23rd, 1991. Drilling revealed a total depth of ten (10) feet to bedrock. A five (5) foot bedrock core sample was taken. Well construction was begun and completed on May 24th, 1991 including a 2" P.V.C. piezometer, sand pack, bentorite pellet seal, well casing, concrete pad, locking well Cap, and all associated materials and appurtenances. * Final Cost: o Auger with split -spoon sampling: 10 Feet @ $ 50.00/Foot = $ 500.00 o Core sampling and retrieval: 5 Feet @ $ 100.00/Foot = $ 500.00 o 2" P.V.C. Piezometer (1st): 6.5 Feet @ $ 30.00/Foot= $ 195.00 $ 1,195.00 - 2 - PMW-4: Drilling began on May 21st, 1991 and was completed on May 22nd, 1991. Drilling revealed a total depth of eighteen (18) feet to bedrock. A five (5) foot bedrock core sample was taken. Well construction was completed on May 24th, 1991 including two (2) 2" P.V.C. piezometers, sand pack, bentonite pellet seal, well casing, concrete pad, locking well cap and all associated materials and appurtenances. It should be noted that the second piezometer installed in this well remained dry after a weeks time and is thus scheduled for abandonment, as per a May 31st, 1991 meeting between Lawrence Gallagher of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Tim Welling of Chazen Environmental Services. * Final Cost: o Auger with split—spoon sampling: 18 Feet @ $ 50.00/Foot = $ 900.00 o Core sampling and retrieval: 5 Feet @ $ 100.00/Foot = $ 500.00 0 2" P.V.C. Piezometer (1st): 18 Feet @ $ 30.00/Foot = $ 540.00 o 2" P.V.C. Piezometer (2nd): 11 Feet @ $ 32.50/Foot = $ 357.50 $ 2,297.50 -- 3 - PMW-5: Drilling began and was finished on May 20th, 1991. Drilling revealed a total depth of twenty-six (26) feet to bedrock. A five (5) foot bedrock core sample was taken. Well construction was completed on May 21st, 1991, including a 2" piezometer, sand pack, bentonite pellet seal, well casing, concrete pad, locking well cap and all associated materials and appurtenances. Final Cost: o Auger with split -spoon sampling: 26 Feet @ $ 50.00/Foot = $ 1,300.00 o Core sampling and retrieval: 5 Feet @ $ 100.00/Foot = $ 500.00 o 2" P.V.C. Piezometer (1st): 16 Feet @ $ 30.00/Foot = $ 480.00 $ 2,280.00 TOTAL WELL DRILLING COST TO DATE: PMW - 1 $ 250.00 PMW - 2 $ 700.00 PMW - 3 $ 1,195.00 PMW - 4 $ 2,297.50 PMW - 5 $ 2,280.00 $ 6,722.50 It is the opinion of this office that the enclosed June 28th, 1991 Voucher submitted by CAMO Laboratories in the amount of $ 6,722.50 is acceptable. II. CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES VOUCHER Onsite geologic services was provided continually during drilling procedures, and subsequent hydraulic conductivity testing on three wells. This cost includes all personnel, equipment and reimbursable expenses accrued for the period April 25th, 1991 to May 29, 1991. TOTAL GEOLOGIC SERVICES COST TO DATE = $ 4,289.31 It is the opinion of this office that the enclosed June 17th, 1991 Voucher submitted by Chazen Environmental Service in the amount of $ 4,289.31 is acceptable. III. ESTIMATED COST VS .COST TO DATE The estimated cost for monitor well drilling and baseline sampling, including all professional services and subsequent Report preparation were estimated in a March 4th, 1991 letter from CAMO Laboratories as follows: o Original 1987 Proposal $ 16,424.00 o Additional Cost to Drill Wells into bedrock, retrieve bedrock core samples, and cluster piezometers $ 11,250.00 o Additional Cost to Drill 6th Well $ 5,575.00 o Cost of Hydrogeologic Services $ 12.083.00 Total Estimated Cost (3/04/91) - S 45,332.00 Including drilling, geologic surveys, well development, baseline sampling of six monitoring wells and report preparation. ACTUAL COSTS ACCRUED TO DATE $ 6,722.50 (Sum of CAMO and Chazen Vouchers) $ 4.289.31 Including drilling and geologic surveys $ 11,011.81 if five wells. Since two wells were found to be dry, two -three additional wells must be drilled. All wells must then be developed, baseline sampling taken and a Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) must be prepared. - 5 - IV. REMAINING WORK 1. Since the two borings at the higher elevation (PMW 1 and 2) revealed no water, and were subsequently abandoned, two additional monitor wells must be drilled. As per a meeting between Lawrence Gallagher of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Tim Welling of Chazen Environmental Services, two new well locations were proposed. (See enclosed correspondence, dated May 31st, 1991). These are as follows,• A. An up gradient overburden well located east of the existing monitoring wells along the southerly fence/property line. B. A down gradient overburden and rock well in the low lying area to the south of the site, on lands of Castle Point Veterans Administrations.Hospital. This office has no problem with the first proposed well location, but we would express concern over the second proposed well location. It is questionable whether or not the Federal Government would allow us to drill on lands of the Veterans Administrations Hospital, and even if they would, the time required to receive such an approval could prove to be prohibitive. It should also be noted that the Veterans Administrations Hospital site is currently used to burn trash, and was reputedly used as a landfill in the past. For these reasons, we are going to suggest to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that instead of drilling on Veteran Administration Hospital land, we drill at the extreme southerly border of our lands. 2. Efforts made by CAMO Laboratories to develop the wells according to the approved protocol proved to be unsuccessful. (ie: the water didn't clear up after repeated bailing). It is our opinion that this inability to develop the wells is due to the fact that all borings resulted in extremely low yielding wells. This office subsequently requested, and received a cost estimate from Chazen Environmental Services to perform well development utilizing peristaltic pumps. The total cost to develop each well is estimated as $ 319.00, which estimate includes one day of technician time ($ 224.00 per day) and all associated equipment rental ($ 95.00 per day). A copy of the July 1st, 1991, Chazen proposal is enclosed herein. If the proposed Chazen well development protocol is found to be acceptable by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, then it is the opinion of this office that the Town should authorize Chazen Environmental Services to perform the prescribed work. - 7 - APPENDIX A CRMO VOUCHER - JUNE 28TH, 1991 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, N.Y. P.O. 3ox 324, Middiebush Road Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 12590 PURCHASE ORDER & VOUCHER r CRMO Laboratories CLAIMANT'S 367 Violet Avenue NAME AMD Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 ADDRESS L � Purchase Order No. DO NOT WRIT[ IN THIS SOX Dat* reschor Rmcei+*d FUND . APPROPRIATION • 11 AMOUNT Ahetract We. ............„....... .«.... . . ..... .. ... ...... _... _ ... render: W. Ne. TOTAL Delis Q15setNr DeavlerNee aI Asterisk er Serniees Castlepoint Landfilr Town of Wapp. limit Mee Amen" PMWI 5 Ft 6 1/4" hollow stem augering 50 00 250 00 with continuous split spoon sampl. No NX coring No 211 PVC piezometers PMW2 14 Ft 61/4" hollow stem augering 50 00 700 00 and cont. split spoon sampling No NX coring No 2" PVC Piezometers Auger Refusal PMW3 10 Ft 6 1/41r hollow stem augering 50 00 500. 00 and cont. split spoon sampling 5 Ft NX Diamond coring 6.50 2" PVC Piezometers 100 30 00 00 500 195 00 00 Toy 1611. 1 CLA)MAN7"S CERTIFICATION . ...... ...................................... .............. ................. —............................................. ......... certify that the abero accesrnt in the asroest at i is fere and corrod; that the Omens, sorrlces ed diMmrsonrtsfs charged were rendered to or ler the raedeieefi on the dates stated; that e „ fy o cart has been raid ....... ....` 1r�....... or is ufw11T d to If fez= rrrn c w 't , m sc • and t the s•errat < rye SIGNATURE TITLE "X et ISee Eerier for AwaWNl Use) DATE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The above wrvfces or materiais were rendered or tsrnlahed to The MankiPaPity on the dates stated and the thanes are Cor- nua. .............. DATE- .. AUTNO#IZ[0 O►►IC. IAL APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT This tiair Is aPereed and ordered Paid from the APPF"dsties i#diufed ahevo, . . ................ DATE AUDITING [OARD TOWN OF WAPPINGER, N.Y. P.O. Box 324, Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 12590 PURCHASE ORDER & VOUCHER F CRMO Laboratories, Inc. CLAIMANT'S NAME 367 Violet Avenue AMC AMISS Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 . ...... .................... .... . .... ............ Data 11 Qt MNIV ftesmAp"M 44 Materials se sorriew Porchoso 00dor No, 00 NOT WRITE IN THIS PDX Data YaKhor I&C46VO4 FUND - APPROPRIATION* II AMOUNT Abstract Mo. V4"Ws 71+01. Na. PKW4 18 Ft 6/4" Hallow Stem Augering and cont. split spoon sampling 5 Ft NX Diamond coring is Ft 2" PVC Piezometer 11 Ft 211 PVC Piezometer to cluster PMW5 26, Ft 6 1/41' Hollow.Stem Augering and cont. split spoon sampling 5 Ft NX Diamond Coring 16 rt 211 PVC Piezometer TOTAL Unit fwin Aww"t 50 100 30 32 00 00 00 50 900 500 540 357 00 00 00 50 50 100 30 300 00 500 00 480 100 TOTAL $1722 150 CLAIMANT'S CERTIFICATION . .................... ....john-Misenhar.dt ....................................................... car"ify flatthe Share a"ovist is the ass"at of 6, 722.50 .111-1.1 . L ' L ...... ................ is true ani co~; that the Item, monkto and disisorsoneitto cWtOW won rendered to sqP for the momicipality on the dates stated; that me Part has bean paid that t8101 fr00 witich the 1610OW000F it scomot, an set J&chW&d; ani that the Awwwat claimed is act"Ify d ........... ... ..... ... DXTE SIGNATURE Ting 11108" Below few Massiploal Use) APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL This chin is sporoved and ordered paid from the APProortatiox io4itaNd slaw. The aisave services or materiab won reordered or famisisW 19 tie "Nakipality on Hoe dates stated and the Chem" are car - Mt. ...... .............................................. ... ...... ...... . .................................... A UTNOM Z ED 0 IFIFf CIAL DATE AUDITING SOARD ....................... P ................. APPENDIX B CHAZEN VOUCHER - JUNE 17TH, 1991 TOWN OF WAPPINOER, N.Y. P.Q. Box 324, Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 12590 PURCHASE ORDER & VOUCHER F 7 CLAIMANTS Chazen Environmental Services One Overocker Road AmESs Poughkeepsie, NY 1:503 L ..J TEiEAfAg't..,...aQ........._. ........ ......... ........... .__.�� . Dafea 06/17/91 Q1185" Deurhgost of A sterfals aw Sarrkae ►erchase Order me. DO HOT WRITE IM THIS BOX v.raMre Ref. Ma. Project No. 49117.00 Castle Point Landfill Sub Surface Investigati Report ( Invoice No. 184 For: Completed a total of 6 borings into whi 4 monitor wells were installed. Perfor hydraulic conductivity tests on 3 wells We are awaiting a meeting with DEC to d cuss further work.. Com M TOTAL Assistant it ,2891 31 289 131 CLAIMANTS CIRTIFICATION Timothy...... 4 ''g9 2 1. ........................... ........,.............................................................., certify that the ahava aecsewt k. the aroeof of i........i..r,........a....................... is trea and correct; that Ow lose, services and dishersanwnfs charNd was ioadamd to or for the nwnicipaiih as the dates stated; that no part his beer paid or sethfied; that tam free which the sansI I s ex6mpx ass swsVioclwdad, and that the unapt claimed is actually dos. ............... . ...,....9....1... ............,.. .� ..........._... �... .. Project 4gr ....... ................................,...... ......�TeHut:TinF..............;.... ISpace Mief for Moniclpal U"I, DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The antra wrvicea or materiale wore readered or frsnlahed to the seniciplitp ow the dates stated led the chagm an ear. net. ........................ ................ ................. DATE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT This clam is aparorod and ordered paid from the appropriation isdicafed $bene. ................... ........... ............,...AUDITING BOARD 11 11 t � �' ' E��•rI'''-'.111��. �='?''=ti f"'.:_�1. ;ar i'�i_w1�yi 'i`('r l�"l.:. i. Ti-vt.! ir_C? C'4uiiti r moi- 1.345 T(-rwn o r Wapp.il-19GtF F -O Box 324 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls, NY 12 590 Project: Castle Point For: Landfill Sub Surface Inves•�igation Report Professional Services: April 25, 1991 through May 29, 1291 PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Hc,urs Rate Amc,unt Sr &?ologist Welling, Timothy 11.11 ��t:l.c: l 280. 0o Jr Geologist Zeller, Lorraine 63.f:1 45.(7(? 2,835.00 Totals 74.0 3,715.00 Total Labpr 3,715.00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Client Reimb . Expi nse 13.48 MI 00002 March IsLtZU #1/Ial_t:.0 #2 49 m> @ �1:1�275/mi MI 011:7003 (85/20 Equip. Utilicati.crn 1/2 day HNU 39.50 MI (1111:1013 (_)5/21 Equip. Utilization 1/2 day HNU 35.517 MI (]1:11.1173 05/22 Equip. Utilization 1/2 day HNU 39.50 MT 170101173 ()5/23 Equip. UtiIic,'at1on i./2 day HNU 39.50 MI 0 0003 1)5/?+ Equip, Utilization 1/2 dray HNU C 39.50 MI i0003 05/28 Equ1p. UtiIizatior, 1/2 day HNU 39.50 Mi 010117173 05/29 Equip. Utilization Field Pkg 25.00 MI (74:003 05/21:1 Equip. Utilization 02/E;;plcrsimetel 35. 00 MI c (:)(:,73 05/21 Equip. UtiIicaticrn 012/E„pIosimete'r- 35.0111 T0)0 003 05/22 Equip. Uti1izati011 1;'/E;;pIc-simeter 35.(:1(1 MI x(.)003 t:r5/83 Equip, UtiIicati01i-? Oc/E.x,pIosime_•er 35.0117 MI 017003 05/lei*, Equip. Utilization 02/ExpIosimet=',1.. 35.00 MI o010173 i75/12S Equip. UtiIi zation 02/E.rtp1c1siltleter 35.()() ACcuUnt S-Ubtotal 48[.48 Emp1c,yee Reimb. Expense 9 � Ea;� EX 001201 015/1:12 Welling, Tim�_1thj, �IIi Ieasi, e . EX 1.10112o 175/22 Wellilig, Timothy EX 01:11217 (.15 2'3 Welling, Timothy Mileage 1.1,1-;(7 EX (:117121 05/22 7"e 11 Lorrail1e viii lenge 32.r+5 EX ;101121 05/29 3eIIe}-, Lo'rr.ain2 mil 24.75 AcCOUI-It Subtotal 88.83 iI Tl.kir i.l 'i l�}. If i1]L(i .adbl.! 1�5 574.31 TOTAL 'THIS INVOICE 4 , 259. 31 APPENDIX C CHAZEN WELL DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE DATED - JULY 1ST, 1991 CHAZEN EIN4 VIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 TEL: (914) 454-6910 FAX: (914) 454-4104 July 1, 1991 "1 Q 1�9i Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York Subject. Monitor Well Development Reference. Castle Point Landfill Dear Peter, Per your request, I have . prepared the following proposal to perform well development services on the three existing and three proposed monitor wells located on the Castle Point Landfill Site. The wells will be developed following both the enclosed protocol prepared by CRMO Labs and our own Chazen Environmental Services Protocol. The Chazen protocol encompasses pump developing both normal and low yielding wells. The time estimated to develop these wells is one day per well or a total of six technician days plus well development equipment. The estimated cost for this work is on a per well basis as outlined below: Technician .............................................. $224.00/day x 6 days = $1,344.00. Equipment Rental ....................................... $95.00/day x 6 days = $570.00. Estimated Development Cost ....................................................... $1,914.00. Work on the existing wells may begin within a week of authorization. Please direct any questions concerning this development to me. Sincerel o y G. Welling Dir for CHAZEN WELL DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOL LOW YIELDING WELLS 1) Record all information as listed on the well development field data sheet. 2) Determine and record the static water level and the depth to the bottom of the well. 3) Determine the volume of water present in the column by taking the difference between the static water level and the depth to the bottom of the well times the volume per foot of casing based on its diameter. 1.5" = 0.092 gals/ft. 2.0" = 0.163 gals/ft. 4.0" = 0.653 gals/ft. 6.0" = 1.469 gals/ft. 8.0" = 2.611 gals/ft. 4) Small diameter wells (<4.0") with a static water level of less than 29 feet from the top of the casing will be developed using a peristaltic pump. Small diameter wells with a static water level of greater than 29 feet will be developed using a bailer, a bladder pump or nitrogen lift system. Large diameter well s (>4.0") will be developed using a four inch 1/2 HP. stainless steel submersible pump. Regardless of the method, any equipment that is placed in a well must be steam cleaned and/or dedicated to the well beforehand. 5) Evacuate the well five times. 6) Determine and record the pH and specific conductivity at least once during each evacuation. The final three conductivity readings should not vary by more than 10% and the last three pH readings should not vary by more than 0.3 units. The water must also be as clear as possible for the well to be considered developed, preferably less than 5 NTU. 7) Record the recovery rate of the well following the first evacuation. The next evacuation can begin as soon as the well has recovered to 90% of the original volume or after 24 hours. 8) Upon completion of development, the well is ready to be sampled. Since the water present in the column is representative of the formation water it can be sampled immediately once the well has sufficiently recovered. If it has not recovered, it can be sampled up to a maximum of 7 days from time of completion. APPENDIX D CORRESPONDENCE FROM CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATED - MAY 31ST, 1991 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 TEL: (914) 454-6910 FAX: (914) 454-0104 May 31, 1991 Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York Subject: Meeting with Larry Gallagher (NYSDEC) Reference. Castle Point Landfill Dear Peter, 4 PAGGi &A�' I met with Larry Gallagher this morning to discuss the hydrogeologic portion of the Castle Point Landfill "SIR". A brief summary of the drilling to date was reviewed and is outlined below. Monitor Wells PMW-3, PMW-4A, PMW-4B and PMW-5 have been installed. Borings at well locations PMW-1 and PMW-2 resulted in auger refusal before groundwater was encountered. In order to determine whether the till is perching the water table, two wells were installed in boring 4. PMW-4A and PMW-4B were screened at the two intervals which had indicated a possible water table. Groundwater was found in PMW-4B; PMW-4A remained dry after a weeks time, and is thus scheduled for abandonment. Groundwater was encountered in Monitor Wells PMW-3, PMW-413 and PMW-5. As a result of my meeting with Larry, the following plan was developed to further investigate the site's hydrogeology: Develop and sample Monitor Wells PMW-3, PMW-4B and ?MW -5 per the establish protocols. Install an upgradient overburden well on-site east of the existing wells (refer to the enclosed sketch for the proposed location as approved by NYSDEC). Based on obtaining permission from the V.A., install both an overburden and a bedrock well off-site to the south of the property (refer to the enclosed sketch for the proposed location as approved by NYSDEC). Develop and sample these additional wells, should they be installed, per the established protocols. Note: An additional issue, ie. the source of contamination, may arise if the chemistry of these off-site wells contravenes groundwater standards. Larry will discount these data to some degree, however, a noncompliance is still a violation of Part 703.5 groundwater standards. NYSDEC's determination that a sixth monitor well be installed may result in additional costs to the town from CES as well as the others members of the project team. Please direct any questions concerning these issues to me. Sincerely, 5 oth . Welling Direc r cc: Rich Gerbis, (CANTO Labs.) Glenn Morris, (CAMO Labs.) Mike Tremper, (CRMO Labs.) Tom Andrews, (Andrews Well Drilling) PAGGI & MARTIN U "7" "'WT " T V E D Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 34-56 Main Street JAN 2 4 1992 Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914-471-7 898 January 21, 1992 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 Attention: Lawrence Gallagher ELAINE SNOWDEN TOWN CLE14K LALW;1411101101 113011 pit I Reference: Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) Castle Point Landfill Town of Wappinger Dutchess County, New York Dear Larry: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of this date, enclosed please find the following information regarding the above referenced project: 1. Project Update 2. Draft S.I.R. Information This information is submitted for your review and -comment. Please inform this office when you have completed your review, so that a project meeting may be scheduled. The current extension for the S.I.R. submittal deadline expires on January 21st, 1992. Per your request, we will not request an extension at this time, but will instead determine the extension duration at our upcoming project meeting. As we discussed, the scheduling of the proposed project meeting after the existing January 21st, 1992 S.I.R. submittal deadline, will in no way invalidate our current order on Consent. Joseph E. I}aggi, Jr., P, E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P.E., L.S. January 21, 1992 Page Two New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 Attention: Lawrence Gallagher Reference: Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) Castle Point Landfill Town of Wappinger Dutchess County, New York If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. truly yours, Peter J. Pa for Paggi & PJP:nar Encl. cc: Town Board-Attn: Constance D. Smith, Supervisor w/Encl. Tim Welling-Chazen Environmental Services without/Encl. TNN -_1-1992'' IZ':49 FROM THE CHHCEI I i:O''E iii .47iCICK-11 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 1260 TEL: (914) 454--6910 FAX: (914) 454--0104 January 21, 1992 Peter Paggi Pa' and'Martin Engineers 54-66 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New 'York 12601 Subject Castle Point Landfill (SIR) Re: Project Update Dear Peter. Pursuant to our meeting on January 20, 1992, I have prepared the following project update. The work completed to date encompasses the following tasks: Supervised the installation and logging of six borings into which four monitor wells were installed ill Acted as site safety officer under OSHA CFP, 1910.120 ■ Developed and sampled three of these monitor wells, PMW3, PMW4A and PMW6. (A sufficient sample could not be obtained from well PMW-4B due to seasonal low water table.) • Performed basic hydraulic Conductivity analyses on these wells ■ Presented the preliminary Endings to NYSDEC and worked with 'them to complete the SIR. requirements Prepared draft maps and report sections on the following: 1. Direction of surface water flow; 2. Depth to bedrock; 3. Geologic cross-sections; and, 4. Well logs and completion diagrams. it Reviewed well chemistry data • Installed one more well and boring per NYSDEC agreement .JAN -21_199.2 13:49 FROM THE ,'.HHZEN C ,S TO 41,1 905 P. The work remaining on this project is listed as follows: Develop Well PMW-7 We have attempted to develop well PMWM7, however due to low seasonal groundwater levels, we are not able to sample this well at the current time. Based on its location, we anticipate that during the spring seasonal high groundwater table period, we will be able to sample this well. • Sample, analyze and evaluate data from this well; • Determine direction of groundwater flow and water; Prepare report; and, • Prepare the following maps: L Direction of groundwater flow; 2. Areas of groundwater recharge and discharge; 3. Depth to bedrock; 4. Geologic cross-sections; 5. Final well logs 6. Hydraulic conductivity data; and, 7. Develop and sampling protocols and field data. Based on this update and assuming the chemistry data are within standards, the project appears to be 80% complete. Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this study. Sincerely, w othy . Welling, P.G. TGW:dI JAN -21-1992- 1 49 FROM THE CH1 4=1 C.0 " 'D TO CASTLE POINT WATER ELEVATIONS 4710901-71 P-04 YaY01%� sr•%.wlk a' � �i.Y.M . ,, .r � 3. .,.� R MNK •Y tl: � MRy} M ��� ��µ�.a ,K 'c. _ :.�i.x`H+%. -��k. .�MvifM'..°b..CraAfl •*a.MM -S �ii.ies►fixx '"y,JoivC I: .v4%�.I....% `.. 05/21/91 ---- 53. 05/23/91 ---- 56.38 --- 05/24/91 60.88 56.30 -- .11 05/28191 50.25 55.63 56.35 5 47 05/30/91 60.12 55.45 56.40 08/28/91 60.25 56.10 D 08/29/91 60.19 56.01 ,6RY 51. 08/30/91 60.10 55.99D 6 5L78 09/5/91 59.835.1 Y 53.25 09/30/91 6L18 t-63 DR 5 01 6 58.6 57.55 54.32 DRY TMhd--1'='?� _ a W;{�'I"1 i rl �iHw=f ,.I� ' _ i =k 1'�; =1 r . _,=7 TFiN-21-.='Ji-_% o .`p.,Cill A1Ct'1Z.E"" 1L' �tl f am"D ELVAT10N A tOMrA.M r I .�ii_�1`.� _� rr1�` IHS _r=1-__ 1 DRILL METHOD: HOLLOW ,TCM AUGER WELL., PMW-7 LATE COMPLETED 12/11/91 BY; ANDREWS WELL DRILLING TYPE: MONITORING CL a TOWN OF WAPPINGERS q 2d5 Cry wlTk CHELSEA RIVER ROAD v x LING HASP u COUNTY, DUTCHESS o W STATE: NEW YORK Qi GRO[1N4 SURFACE 00-4.40 FT+. BROVN FINE SAND, SLIME + + SILT, TRACE FINE GRAVEL. t a (FILL), MMMT, LCIOTE, F 1I m •2.00 INCH PVC RISER t t 0.40 INGN PROTECTIVE CASING ` + �* m + + + 1� + + } �+ L00 INCH BORING 7° ■■� t + + F�f�ti' /,f f + + t fh t t� + + errl w! i; ■ r• ■■I DATEi j2/12/91 + a � H i0l rn + + + „i r ��. + + +Fri rt Ise ,rR a •2.00 INCH PVC RISER t t 0.40 INGN PROTECTIVE CASING ` + �* m + + + 1� + + } �+ L00 INCH BORING 7° ■■� t + + F�f�ti' ro 2 f + + t fh t t� + + errl w! i; ■ r• ■■I DATEi j2/12/91 + a •2.00 INCH PVC RISER t t 0.40 INGN PROTECTIVE CASING ` + �* m + + + 1� + + } �+ L00 INCH BORING 7° 7.0 TOTAL DEPTH = 7.0 /.0 CWAZEM ENVIRONMCNTAL SERVICES, INC. GEQLpGIST: L.TEI_LER DECEM$EFi, 1991 TOTRL F-02 ■■� ■�� + t errl w! i; ■ r• ■■I DATEi j2/12/91 h + +• + +�r � H i0l rn + + + „i r■ ■ + + +Fri rt 0 rr r �i■ r l.0 7.0 TOTAL DEPTH = 7.0 /.0 CWAZEM ENVIRONMCNTAL SERVICES, INC. GEQLpGIST: L.TEI_LER DECEM$EFi, 1991 TOTRL F-02 + t h + +• + +�r � H + + + „i + + +Fri rt 0 * + } t *+� + + + + + F+ hp} + + +14.4 4.40-6.50 FT. BROWN -GREY SILT, SOME FINI~ SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, J V V V (TILL), DRY, VERY DENSF.CGM) p V p �rvv 17�v t7 b V vvv vnv vVV vvv LNOCAP SCREEN 7 Q 7 C7' vvv 17 vvc 7 v V17 v vdri 7 7.0 TOTAL DEPTH = 7.0 /.0 CWAZEM ENVIRONMCNTAL SERVICES, INC. GEQLpGIST: L.TEI_LER DECEM$EFi, 1991 TOTRL F-02 DRILL METHOD. HOLLOW STE14 AUGER BY► ANDREWS WELL DRILLING 18.0 WELL. PHW-6 TYPE: BORING TOWN OF WAPPINGErRS CHELSEA RIVER ROAD COUNTY= DUTCHESS STATE: NEW YORK GATE XMP(.CTED! 11/14/9► 0-2 FT, EkWN FINE—MEDIUM SAND, F 15 SOME FINE -COURSE GRAVEL 'TRACE 14 20 SILT, TRACE SMALL COBBLES. (f ILL) 9 MOIST,HEDEUM, DENSE. 7 SILT, TRACE LL COBBLES, L 6 2-4 FT, DROWN FINE—MCDIUM SAND, h 9 4.0 SOMC E'lNE—COARSE (,I?AVJ~L, TRACE SILT, TRACE SMALL COIIIILES, (FILL,) y s MOIST, LOOSE. Z2� I• 19 b 4-6 FT, BROWN FINE—MEDIUM SAND. II 4.0 SAME FTN[ -COARSE GRAVEL RACE 14 SIL f, TRACE SHALLF:BLE ( ILL) h 14 m 4 8.0 1 12 f T. WN FINE- DIUM LAND. 10 S E NE -COARSE RAV , T E 13 S x ILL), RMT$ Q 11 F 1E 140 T,L h. ++ 6 I2— FT. B CW FI — TUM SAND, 7 5 1 I2.0 1�0 M + + 12 8 12 14-1r 'T, FINE—CWSG SAND. 4� —14.0 S FINC—CUARSE GRAVEL 14 WET, MEDIUM DENSE. 24 20 1 213 --� 1 0 6 17 15.0 18.0 WELL. PHW-6 TYPE: BORING TOWN OF WAPPINGErRS CHELSEA RIVER ROAD COUNTY= DUTCHESS STATE: NEW YORK GATE XMP(.CTED! 11/14/9► 0-2 FT, EkWN FINE—MEDIUM SAND, F + + ++ + SOME FINE -COURSE GRAVEL 'TRACE * } SILT, TRACE SMALL COBBLES. (f ILL) + +5_+ MOIST,HEDEUM, DENSE. 4. +r► SILT, TRACE LL COBBLES, L + + 2-4 FT, DROWN FINE—MCDIUM SAND, h 44- 2.o i SOMC E'lNE—COARSE (,I?AVJ~L, TRACE SILT, TRACE SMALL COIIIILES, (FILL,) + t + s MOIST, LOOSE. + + I• + +$. +. + + b 4-6 FT, BROWN FINE—MEDIUM SAND. + 4.0 SAME FTN[ -COARSE GRAVEL RACE + SIL f, TRACE SHALLF:BLE ( ILL) h t m MOIST, MEDIUM . + + h + 6-8 FT, BROWN FIN —MEDT S SAME FINE— C RSE GRA L. RA SILT, TRACE LL COBBLES, L + + + MOIST, MEDIUM Sc. yyr + } ]/M 8-10 FT, BROWN F1 -MEDIUM SAN + + 5014£ F — O GRAVEL, T %CE RO SILT ACE LL BILES. ( LL), + t T, MEDIUM S. +Q+� 4. � + 1 12 f T. WN FINE- DIUM LAND. " + + +� + S E NE -COARSE RAV , T E * S x ILL), RMT$ Q 11 F +, + + i0.0 T,L h. ++ 4- + + ►'fid- + + I2— FT. B CW FI — TUM SAND, SOME. L. TRACE SILT, I2.0 WET, MEDIU MSF. M + + + fi 14-1r 'T, FINE—CWSG SAND. +p + + S FINC—CUARSE GRAVEL h+11 WET, MEDIUM DENSE. +`t + 1 + Ty + 15.0 15-16 FT. GREY SILT, SOMC FINE SAND. v v rr t 7 TRACE FINE GRAVEL ;TILL), MOIST' v v v v ME=DIUM, DENSE. (GM), vvvv v vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv I6-10 rT, GREY SILT, SOME FINE: SAND J v v v v TRACE: FINE GRAVEL (TILL), v v v v v DRY. NEDIU14 IIENSE. (GM), It v v v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvv 21-23 PT, GREY SILT, SOME FINE SAND, v v ry v v TRACE TINE GRAVEL. (TELL), v v v V � DRY, MEDIUM DENSE:, (GME. v v v v v vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvIvv vvvv V v v v p 23 FT, BCDR13CK= GREY—BLACK SHALE. vvvv v z3. TOTAL DEPTH = 23,00 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SErVICES, INC. GEOLOGIST! L.ZELI.ErR DECEMBER, 1991 2 4 I4 C is. 2 24 26 TRILL MET -i LiOLLO'd S7Ex A.t4EP .PC B'(- ANDREWS WELL 3R3LL 1K:> v CATS 4OAFLE IED: 45%'1 4l Tc MONITORIN1s E_EVA7IGNS: TOWN OF WAPPINCiERS -2.i GAP WITH CHELSEA RIDGE ROAD TGA CF CAS,,VC. �8.:c� LUCKING WASP COUNT ;. DUTCHESS GROUND SURFACci ~;5,560 STATE_ NE`s YORK -0 GROUND %;,:APACE -XIS 3.00 :;ACHE; NX CORING BENTONITE TCI AL 0EF H = 3C._i5 CIIAZEN ENVIRUNMENTAL SERVICES, INC, � Ll I GEOLBOIST: U. ZELLER jUNC. 1991 r% r% A Com' i_U 3Il4H,�W03 I.13Z�!'�:� =Hi 410:x:: 7r &�T_iC-��(iw� CEM[NT 0.0 - 2.0 FT, KOWN FINE 'SAND, SOME ---- _0 8.80 ;NCI BORINL SILT, LITTLE r INE GRAVEL, (FILL), T { *, MOIST, L=SE, 6.OQ INCH PROTECTIVE CASING+ + + + + 2,0 - 4.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND, SOME ' v SILT, LIT+7LE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL-., MOST, MEDIUM DENSE, + Y + + + i+ •y Y, BEId7Cl.1;E <0 6.4 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, SOME + t � SILT. LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), 4. MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE. + + + d + 6.0 - E.0 FT. a""ROWN FINE SAND, SOME QVC QO INCH RISER $'.LT, LITTLE FIVE - M£D1'rF1 G;ZAVCL +� r (FI,L), MOIST. MEDIUM tNSE. + -� r 2.0 0 8A 10,0 FT. BROWN ('INE SAND. "TME X3.0 SILT. LITTLE FINE - MrDI'UM GRAVEL. .FILL), MOIST, MEDIL:K Z;ENSC. t + T + 10.0 - 12.0 FY. BROWN FINE SAND. =OME SILT, LITTLE FINE - MEDIUM SAND GRAVEL, (FILL.), MOIST, MEDILIM DENSE. " + * +,. + +rri Ilc n 12.0 - 14.5 FT, BROWN FINE Si SOME + ,+ SII', LITTLe %IN'_' - MEI,IUM + * r I vi GRAVEL (FILL), MOIS7. MEDI:;M iiNSE. r + 13,5 5.00 FDCT SCRELN WITH ENDCAP T ' la 0 14,5 - 16.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND. SOME WATER CEPTHi 13.45 (LACUSTRINC), MOIST, LOOSE. BATCi 95/3/91 ELLV, 54.7 _16'a 1b 0 - :7,G FT. BRCWN rINC SAND. SAND tLACISTPINE), MOIST, Jt*1SE. '7.0 - - 17.0 - 1$.0 FT. GREY SILT,, (LSGL'STRINE) r „., MOIST, LOOSE, -_ ' - - ^-180 18.0 - 20 FT. CREY SILT. (LAC;:S`RINE), - - -- - MOIS7, LOOSE. - - - 2G.11 Z4.D - 22.0 iT. GREY SILT, TPACE CLAY. --- TRACE FINE GRAVEL, (LACUSTPINC), _- - MOIST, LOOS. _� - 22.0 - 23.5 ;'T, GREY SILT. SOME FINE 5EN7^NITE SANG, (LACUSTRINE), L� J _ __ _ -i MOIST, MEDILM DENSE. ' 03.5 - 24.0 FT. GREY FINE-CGARSE SAND t r - 240 �LACUSTRINE,, 1401ST, HELIUM DENSE. 24.0 • 25.5 FT, CRE7 SILT AND FINE 7 7 7 7 SAND. "ACE F,`C - MEDIUM GRAVEL, (TILL). MOIST, DENSE, , '5 5 X2'•.5 25.5 - 30.5 FT. BEDROCK! GRV-3LACK SHALE -XIS 3.00 :;ACHE; NX CORING BENTONITE TCI AL 0EF H = 3C._i5 CIIAZEN ENVIRUNMENTAL SERVICES, INC, � Ll I GEOLBOIST: U. ZELLER jUNC. 1991 r% r% A Com' i_U 3Il4H,�W03 I.13Z�!'�:� =Hi 410:x:: 7r &�T_iC-��(iw� ki 1; a G lE k� 14.0 ---1 DRILL KET'Zi: HCILLOV STEM AUCEP '�I�L.L PMW - 4 LATE CINPLETED: 05/ZE/yi BY= AN;)RZVS VEL -1- DRILLING TYPE : M❑NPORING ELEVATIONS, TOWN Rr WAPPINGERS OP OF CASING- ti7.680 CA? VfTH C:HE4EA RIVER ROAD GROUND SURFACEi 65.410 LOCKING HASP COUNTY, DUTCHESS STATE: NEW ` CRIC GROUND SURFACE --.tl CE:MENf 0.0 -- 2,0 FT.'aROWN FINE 'OND, SAME + SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, a ILL., + + MOIST, LASE, +- 6.00 INCH PROTE:CTIVC CASINO + + + t, SENTGNITE + + T 12'0 2.0 - A,0 FT, BROWN F:NE SAND, SCkM£ 44. +T T 2,00 :*lCH PVC RISEn SILT, LITT:,E FINC GRAVEL, ffi,T'LL,j. -..30 MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE. + + + T D 3 7 3.0G INCH BORING c A 1;.7 1 7.7 -a.9 L --27.0 r■■ w.r ■■■ w■: ON w. ■■w ■■r ■r. res gra r■■ 4.0 - 6.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND, ,SOME T 30+b 4•V SILT, LITTLE FIN£ GRAVEL, <F:LL), + MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE. + + `z .00 r007 SCREEN WITH MCAP + + T + } i 6.0 - 8,0 FT. BROWN FINE SAMA, SOME ;AND SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVr-L, (FILL). + + + � .MOIST, MCOIUM DENSE. + + + + � 8.0 - 10.0 FT, BROVN FINE >AKD, SOME + E SILT, LITTLE F?NE GRAVEL, (FILL) + z MOIST, 14FDIUM DENSE. +T' +' + ;ENTONITE + 10.0 - 12.0 FT. BROWN FINE ;AND, SOME + + + + + b ..00 !NCH PVC RISCR SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL. SMALL + rrq POGTS, ZFILL), MOIST. + LOOSE - MEDIUM DENSE. + + v+ 12.0 12.0 - 14.0 FT, BROVN FINE' SAND, SOMC T + + SILT, LITTLE FINE CRAvEL, SMALL + + + ROOTS, <FILL), MOIST, DENSE. + 5.00 i GDT SCREEN WITH CNDCAP+ + y 1a.0 SAND 14,6 - 16,0 ;7, GREY SILT, =ME FINE v 0 0 Q SAND. TRACT FINE GRAVrJ- +TILL?, DRY, VERY DENSE. 7 Q 7 'V 7vv "+ -T Mu I6.0 - 1$.a FT. GREY FINE SAND. DRY. LOOSE. 13.0 - 215 FT. QUARTZITE BOULOE?, 21-5 - 27 FT. GREY SILT, SOM£ FINE SAND, v 7 v TRACE: FINE GRAVEL, .TILL), DRY. VERY DEM. 7 v v 7717 3.00 114CN idx CORING v v V 70 v7V BENTONITE v v p 17 7 V 7 WATEP LEVELS: �7 p p At DEPTH TO WATEP,: 5.7' 7 7 O G +DATER ELEVAT IN' 56,36 7777 DA_TE-05/i0/91 77 7 7 T7 9= DEPTH 70 'rAT£R', 7,66 vvv . WATER "EVATIEW 53.4" v c v 27.0 DATE; 05/30/51 TuTAL DEPTH = 27.00 CHAZEN ENVIRONI.IEN'TAL l;',-LRV7C.7-S, !NC. OEgLOGIST L.ZELLER J11 -INE. 1991 ME) .Cor 18 20 0 25 27 4.0 12 0 11 4. 4 V :RILL.METHIM, HOLLOW STEL! AUGER 'WELL!t3�sPd---, ATE COMPLE-TE- 05/241"_ 0.0 - PA FT, BRCVN SAND, SOMC SILT. I 1. SYi INDRZW� +'ELL DRI�LINe; TYPE: MONITORINGc_tVATIDNS: ! � Li x TEEN OF WAPPINGERS TI MP OF CASL'NGI 68.=5G f + CAP WITM ILO CHELSEA RIVERROAD GRaCiVD SURF4CZ-' 62.00 II 111 Y. NG HASP '40 INCH PROTECTIVE CASINR GGL'NTY= IIUTCFiEwS X1.5 <�— � ^ o: STATEt NEW YORK l GROUND SURFACE 2.0 - 4.0 FT. BROWN SAND, SOME SiL. T, _ 18 20 0 25 27 4.0 12 0 11 4. 4 V "EMENT 0.0 - PA FT, BRCVN SAND, SOMC SILT. I TRACE CLAY, WOOD, SMALL ROOTS, —0,5 (FILL), XMIST, MEDIUM DENSE. + ENT❑kITE '40 INCH PROTECTIVE CASINR x.40 INCH PVC RISER X1.5 2.0 - 4.0 FT. BROWN SAND, SOME SiL. T, n VA'ER DEPTH-, 2.63 LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, i.r%L:, rn +rC- + 4t LAfE= a5i30/SI MOTTLED, MQIsr, 4 EUIUH DENSE. vvv EL£V: s3.@9 vvv � Aa FUCT SCREEN V17H ENDCAP C ! I r�V, v n ! E v v v , 4.0 - 6,u r T, BROVN-GREG F;N£ 3AND, 7vvc� � } SOME SILT, TRACE --!NC - Kt -]IUM 7 C V ti GRAVEL, (TILU, METTLED, 7vvv DRY, MEDIUM DENSE. +7dv I 0.0 - 8.0 rT. BROWN -GREY FINE SAND, s.0 SAME SILT, TRACE FINE - MF--rl;;M I 7 V v ! vvv C,^AVEL (TILL), MOTTLES, vvv MEDIUM DENSE. —b 5DRY, v C7 CV ( I .00 INCH BORING 8.0 - 9.0 FT, GREY SILT, SOME FINE SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, CTIL0, ' AND DRY, MEDIUM DENSE -- VERY DCINSE 9.0 - :0,4 i 7. GREY Sr—S,7ME FINC SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, (TILL), N", 4LDIUM =14SE - VERY DENSE. :. 1],D 15,0 FT. £EDFGCI:. CR^. Y-SLFCX :;HALL' 0 ;raCH YX CC?IN"s NT"NITE TOTAL DEPTH - 154C CHAZEN ENV:RQMMCNTAL SERA /ICES, ANC. GEELOCIST: L, 7ELL`R .TUNE, I99: nPAPT cli SEPIO&K-0 f�GZHJHO 3Hi V T TG T- 10-1 ,711J. .50 + } r I + n + rn +rC- + 4t s.o vvv vvv � a 1 vvv C ! I r�V, v n ! E v v v , 'M'! 7vvc� � } V 17 V Vi 7 C V ti f 7vvv +7dv I 7 7 v V s.0 I 7 V v ! vvv vvv 7V vv II �, v C7 CV ( I nPAPT cli SEPIO&K-0 f�GZHJHO 3Hi V T TG T- 10-1 ,711J. .50 PAGGI & MARTIN Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914-47 1-7998 June 9, 1992 Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Box 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board X44,. �9 Aq=.F. k Reference: Castle Point Landfill Closure Subsurface Investigation Report Dear Board Members: Enclosed, please find five (5) copies of the "draft" Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) for the Proposed Castle Point Landfill Closure. The enclosed are submitted for your review and comments. A special Town Board Workshop has been scheduled for Thursday, June 11th, 1992 at 5:00 P.M.. Representative of Chazen Environmental services will be present to report on the preparation of the SIR, and to answer any questions that you may have concerning the contents. Also, enclosed (at the front of each copy.of the Report), is a summary of the project history. Costs to date are being compiled, and will be forthcoming as soon as they become available. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ve tru.l you s , P e J. ag ' for Paggi 'n PJP:nar Encl. cc: A. Roberts, Esq., Town Attorney - w/Encl. E. Snowden, Town Clerk - w/Encl. T. Welling, Chazen Environmental Services - w/o Encl. Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. Ernst Martin, Jr., P.E., L.S. PROPOSED CASTLE POINT LANDFILL CLOSURE BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12/16/86 N.Y.S.D.E.C. INFORMS THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER THAT THEY MUST SUBMIT A RENEWAL APPLICATION IF THEY WISH TO CONTINUE UTILIZING THE CASTLE POINT LANDFILL SITE. 01/20/87 PAGGI i MARTIN, AFTER CONDUCTING FIELD INVESTIGATIVE WORK WITH THE TOWN HIGHWAY DEPT., DETERMINE THAT THE LANDFILL HAD REACHED, OR WAS APPROACHING, ITS CAPACITY, AND RECOMMEND THAT CLOSURE PROCEDURES BE PURSUED. 08/17/87 N.Y.S.D.E.C. ISSUES A DRAFT ORDER ON CONSENT. 08/31/87 PAGGI 6 MARTIN RECOMMENDS THAT THE TOWN SIGN AND EXECUTE THE CONSENT ORDER. NO ACTION TAKEN UNTIL 1990 10/23/90 A PROPOSED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PLAN (PSIP) IS SUBMITTED TO THE N.Y.S.D.E.C.. 11/05/90 THE N.Y.S.D.E.C. REQUESTS CHANGES AND/OR REVISIONS TO THE PSIP. 01/11/91 THE FINAL PSIP IS SUBMITTED TO N.Y.S.D.E.C.. 01/23/91 THE N.Y.S.D.E.C. ACCEPTS THE PSIP. FEB -MAR PAGGI i MARTIN ACQUIRES COST ESTIMATES TO PERFORM THE 1991 WORK OUTLINED IN THE PSIP. 03/07/91 PAGGI 6 MARTIN MEETS WITH N.Y.S.D.E.C. TO FINALIZE PSIP WORK PLAN. 04/22/91 TOWN BOARD AUTHORIZES CAMO LABORATORIES/CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES/ANDREWS WELLDRILLING TO IMPLEMENT THE PSIP. 05/20/91 DRILLING BEGINS. 05/31/91 PROGRESS MEETING WITH N.Y.S.D.E.C. 07/15/91 PAGGI AND MARTINO SUBMITS PROGRESS REPORT TO TOWN BOARD. 07/26/91 PROGRESS MEETING WITH N.Y.S.D.E.C.. 11/11/91 PROGRESS REPORT SUBMITTED TO N.Y.S.D.E.C., REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT (SIR), DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE SEASONAL WATER TABLE IS TOO LOW TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SAMPLES. 01/21/92 AT A MEETING WITH N.Y.S.D.E.C., IT IS AGREED THAT THE SIR DEADLINE WILL BE EXTENDED UNTIL SPRING AT WHICH TIME THE SEASONAL WATER TABLE SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SAMPLES. PROPOSED CASTLE POINT LANDFILL CLOSURE WORK REMAINING o SUBSEQUENT TO TOWN BOARD APPROVAL, THE SIR WILL BE IMMEDIATELY SIIBMITTED TO THE N.Y.S.D.E.C. o THE N.Y.S.D.E.C. WILL REVIEW THE DOCUMENT, AND MAY REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, IF ANY, BE SUBMITTED. UPON N.Y.S.D.B.C. APPROVAL, A NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WILL BE ISSUED. o UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE SIR, A CLOSURE PLAN WILL BE FORMULATED AND SIIBMITTED TO THE N.Y:S.D.E.C. AS IN THE PREVIOUS STEPS, THE N.Y.S.D.E.C. MAY REQUEST THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE SUBMITTED. o UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE CLOSURE PLAN, THE ACTUAL LANDFILL CLOSURE WILL BE PERFORMED. o THE MONITORING WELLS SHALL CONTINUE TO BE SAMPLED AT A FREQUENCY DETERMINED BY THE N.Y.S.D.E.C. FOR SUCH DURATION AS THEY DEEM NECESSARY. CASTLE POINT LANDFILL TOWN OF WAPPINGERS SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT HYDRO GEOLOGICAL SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SITE INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY .......................... 1 A. Drilling ...................................................... l B. Monitor Well Installation ................................ .. 1 C. Monitor Well Sampling .............................. . • .. . D. Hydraulic Conductivity 4 II. GEOLOGY .... .... 4� A. Regional Geology ....... .. 4 B. Site Specific Geology ...................... ............. . 6 III HYDROGEOLOGY ... ............. l A Groundwater Flow ... ......... 6 l B. Recharge/Discharge ... 6 C. Hydraulic Conductivity .. .. ..... • ......... 11 IV. WATER QUALITY .. .. 11 V. [......�/.................... 13 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7, S. LIST OF FIGURES RegionalLocation Map ........................................... 2 SiteLocation Map ................................................ 3 Well Location Map 5. Cross -Section Location Map & Cross -Section A -A' ..................... 7 Groundwater Flow Map (January 1992) .............. S Groundwater Flow Map {March 1992} 4 Flow Net Section Location Map Flow N Groundwater Chemistry Map ........ LIST OF A A. Permits, Logs Drilling Summary B. OVA Protocol and Data CGI Protocol and Data Well Development Protocol i C. Well SamplinProtoco Sampli ain of to it An ses from On -Site s D. Hydrau c Cond tivity Pr to . 1 and a Page 1 I. SITE INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY A. Drilling During the course of this investigation, five soil monitor wells were installed in the unconsolidated sediments following the proposed subsurface investigation plan (PSIP). In addition to these wells, three soil borings were completed. Locations of these monitor wells and borings are shown in Figure 1. Attempts to install monitor wells at locations PMW-1 and PMW-2 were unsuccessful based on the dense glacial till and absence of groundwater, thus, these locations were turned into boring sites. Following th6 installation of Wells PMW-3 to PMW-5, a meetin ash 1 th the New York State Department of Environmental Conserv ( SDEC) to d' cuss the findings. As a result of the dense till found on sit and th li ed wate found in the unconsolidated sediments, a decision not to insta bedro lis was ma and agreed to by NYSDEC. As a result of this May 31, .991 meetin , o additio upgradient well and boring were planned for installati n in the nconso 'dated sediments. The attempt to install this upgradient we were quite ifficul based o the limited area, the shallowness of bedrock. a 'ent well, PMW- s installed in late fall of 1991 during lows onal grou wa r condit ns. An agreement was made with NYSDEC t allow is well sit ntil sea nal high groundwater conditions prevailed in he ea y ring of 1 2 s c at a representative groundwater s le oul obt . ed from 's well. Boring Well PMW-6 was installed at D 's st to. e fy the ' it of the landfill to the east. The fill underly' t ball Id as no n e construction or demolition debris ( fer to pp dix Mese monitor well Pborning re completed by T.J. Andrews Well Drilling, Inc. rangevillhe drilling technique implemented was the ho ow stem uger mple collection at 2 ft. intervals using a split spoo sample . Theed from each interval were identified in the field bya. S geo gist. drilling chronol y summarizing the drilling and installation of each well along th the soil d criptions is provided in Appendix A. B. Moriilt9rVell Installation and Development A total of five monitor wells were installed as a result of this project. Upon completion, Well PMW-4B was not found to produce a sufficient quantity of water for sampling. The location of these monitor wells are shown on Figure 2. Each well was constructed according to procedures detailed in the PSIP. Graphic completion diagrams for each well installed are found in Appendix A. All monitor wells were developed in accordance to the protocols established in .Appendix B. Route ry C 0 CL 4t m TM vye"r"RV 03 cd 0 E - e6 .. ............ ...... .. ........ ..... ........ 01, 19 "kp W _ZUK-1- CQ M ZZ r C v CJ CN 0 Eti LZ 0 CL C� V. T© 6. o Page 4 A summary of this protocol includes the following: ■ Determine volume of well ■ Pump a minimum of six well volumes ■ Monitor the groundwater's pH and Specific Conductivity for each well volume pumped. Well Development information concerning each well is located in Appendix B. + C. Monitor Well Sampling Groundwater sampling of each of the monitor wells was carried o m c ance with the protocols located in Appendix C. Thesewells w ` sa led for the following compounds: volatile organics, EPA Metho 24, 5, eneral in ganic parameters, metals, both filtered and unfiltered, PC , pesti i The turbi Ry of each of the monitor wells was measured in the field o be 5 parts illion or less prior to sampling. These parameters were an zed in fillme t of the PSI requirements by NYSDEC. All field data sheets an chain -of -c tody s are found in Appendix C. D. Hydraulic Conductivity i The saturated hydraulic condo tivi of t nd nd grave unc nsolidated sediment aquifer penetrated by the o ite w Bete i ed by g a slug test methodology. The pro by w 'ch is tes w complished and the test results along with phica rep senta ions are loc ed in Appendix D. II. GE GY (A'Re oval( Unco soli " The unco 'date stratigraphy of Dutchess County, New York is predominantly e result of rec t episodes of glaciation in the Hudson Valley. Till deposits of v 'ng thi ess are present throughout much of the County. These deposits are ove ail t y glacto-fluvial and sands and gravels and glacio-lacustrine silts and clays. The consolidated deposits on site can be attributed to processes occurring during the Wisconsin glaciation which ended approximately 13,000 years ago. Bedrock Bedrock in western Dutchess County exhibits a wide variety of geologic processes. The presence of both sedimentary and metamorphic rocks and signs of structural movement such as folds and faults help depict some of the geological activities which have taken place in this region. I 0— z t,M l'^ Qotls I 3 Lr Jn d 0 v � z 10 • Q N L � 0�Ipq' +r ' �U'll '"A, {� a. � p � U N 0 L ® p CL I p, p^ S' 0 < 0 O v� CL Yf� C�7 M O' CL a °�y C14 i d 0 ra B. Site Specific Geology Unconsolidated Sediments The unconsolidated sediments underlying the landfill were all identified as predominantly a very dense, silty, and compact till. This till material was shaped into the hill located on the western portion of the site and is termed a drumlin in geologic literature. Geologic cross section A -A' (Figure 4) constructed through the monitor wells installed east of the edge of the landfill found the till to be overlain by glacio-lacustrine fine sands and silts. These materials were overlain by fill ranging from fine sand with some silt to sand with medium gravel. Thetilli is area contained fairly substantial boulders ars evidenced by the driingg of PMW-4. ^ Bedrock The bedrock underlying this site has been classified a the Mou t Mari o and Indian River shales based on information from Fishers, Isa sen and Ri ards ologic of New York, 1971. The core samples taken s MW -3 d 5 sh black shales with some degree of weathe HYDROGEOLOGY A. Groundwater Flow V U Maps indicating th irection o oun water flow n site were prepared using data col ed Ja o 992 and arch o 992 ' res 5 & 6). The general direction groundwater flo i from no to south with a minor degree of flow from the landf westward to r s Wells VVM-4A and PWM -5. The mound of dense till to ted s of the 1 fi did not ppear to contain any shallow groundwater. The group ate -r- flo m s idicate that the water table above the bedrock as scree d by ell P -7 is seasonal. The dense till is likely acting as a barrier to vertica o d flo}/ oumward into the bedrock, 0 Re 'e f the groundwater elevations observed during this test period resulted in the following: The most significant geologic unit, with respect to the landfill, is the sand/silt and gravel material overlying the till adjacent to the landfill. During the drier times of the year, groundwater is likely to be recharged from these surfscial materials.' A slight upward vertical gradient, as noted in the March 1992 measurements in PMW-4 A and B, showed groundwater rising from the till materials into the fill. A wetland area located north of this site has a strong influence on the groundwater recharge on site. Based on the observations made during this study, the wetland receives the majority of its water as the result of surface runoff from the surrounding topography. This water then infiltrates slowly ChazenFnvimnmental SerViC93, TDC: Page 6 A 70�PMW-3 —Silty sand (Fill) (66.55) 101 no 5 z 0 Li 5, 0 z =3 0 EI E, I 19 ern m Fiqure #4 I r% . I I CL mo 7 o io Q- (,0 ON 0') 'LA- tu 14Z Z Li -j 10 z L. 0 0o 0 0 too 10 0 0 7 o io A -Silty sand (Fill) 70�PMW-3 (66.sS) —Till Roadway -Silt (Glacio-Lacustrine) 65- . . . . -Shale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A IR 7- Li 5 as z ca EI Gni 35--{ 9 Level (3/30/92) flaw Recreation Area 0 (Feet) Approximate Boundary of Landfill Area a—Well o—Boring Fiqure #7 Castle Point Landfill Groundwater Flow Net Section [Drawn by; M11 . IDote WI May— Vor poroveY: IPile Name: 59 Prepared by: Chazen Environmental 50$1 Services, Inc. Page 11 into the groundwater table creating the flow to the south as evidenced during the high groundwater conditions in the March data (Figures 6 & 7). Basically, this wetland area is acting as a groundwater recharge to the shallow unconsolidated materials throughout the year. There is no evidence based on the water levels that the groundwater from the site is discharging to the wetlands. No groundwater discharge zones were encountered on site. C. Hydraulic Conductivity The sand, silt and gravel fill materials screened through Wells PMW-3 and PMW-4A & PMW-5 were found to have a range of saturated conductivity of 6.7 x 10'3 to 2.5 x 10' cm/sec. (Appendix D). This number was based tes res is performed in September of 1991 and May 1992. These v es hydrau fc conductivity are in agreement with published values f mate 'als th predominantly silty fine to coarse sand and gravel (1~ eeze d erry 1979). IV. WATER QUALITY Groundwater samples analyzed were thoroughly Appendix C and on the enclosed diskette inths,.Y as follows: ■ No principal organic ■ A review of these or; contamination existe 5'19 ted aboratory personnel; inor rameters`` gr ndwate tandard Both a filte d and i well be w t e New the rests, of 1kis reporl�,are summarized r ialys Idi ted at o ap ent on-site organic I ever re of the a Is pled for organics September able c centr ions of Di-ethylhexyl) phthalate (debt). detec d in the b od blank and was reported by ikely to e due to laboratory contamination. Most of the dvzed we found to be well below the New York State 703. bn-fired priority pollutant metals were found to be -in levels ork State Part 703.5 groundwater standard. ■ ron, a non-prio ' pollutant metal exhibited a wide range of concentrations between lls. The dwater standard for Iron was exceeded in Well PMW-4A with a co cen tr ' n of 0.36 mg/l (Figure 9). The single exceedence of groundwater stan s in the downgradient well PMW-4A may be attributable to particulates in the sample and thus not truly indicative of what is in the groundwater. = Manganese, another non-priority pollutant metal exhibited levels which were quite high in the upgradient Well PMW-3 as well as the downgradient wells PMW-4A and PMW-5. Manganese standards were exceeded in Wells PMW-3 at 1.5 mg/l, Well PMW-4 at 3.2 mg/1 and Well PMW-5 at 0.33 mg/l. This high background level may indicate the presence of Manganese due to the geologic material and not leachate from the landfill. 00k �\� 9 .. z � 2.. m+ �\ // £ � Jo [ \EE z \ co �% } } . �� % 2 � ]§\ ■ o \y - a \ t °9 02) ?k% ( : `r 7 ] X77 /mak )j a� \ to ° ^ � ± \e� / \® = E . ~ — // 0 §§ / �\ ®_LO • o \E . �\\ ° :( ------— o \ /o 7 (L a 2 » . ■ The general chemistry results indicate that the groundwater quality does not show any degradation in the shallow wells downgradient of the landfill as indicated by no increase in: The chemical oxygen demand (COD), the total organic carbon (TOC) and the biochemical oxygen demand (BODS). This information along with the absence of any organic contaminants substantiate the conclusion that the groundwater quality has not been degraded by the presence of the landfill with the exception of Manganese concentration. These marginal levels may be the result of the background geologic materials and not the landfill.. V. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this hydrogeologic investigation of the Castlemt]l n , Town of Wappingers, New York, the following conclusions fpr ared: ■ The concentration of manganese found in the shall may be the result of natural geologic materials and ■ Based on the data reviewed, the shallow groundwa has not been degraded by landfilling activities on ;noun r at the ]an ill site the landfi owngra ' nt of t e landfill Page 13 I APPENDIX A Permits, Logs, Drilling Summary W -- 2191 -- Town of Wappinger . This is a permit for Andrews Well Drilling to construct one (Name of Driller) water well at Chelsea River Road in (T)(Vqq9L) Wappinger (Location of Well) under provisions of Subpart 5-2 of Part 5 of the New York State Sanitary Code, subject to the following conditions: Within 30 days of the completion of water well >' construction, the applicant shall: COUNTY OF DUTCHESS — DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH well PERMIT 2) Disinfect the TO CONSTRUCT A WATER WELL '—_:} 3) Submit a . This is a permit for Andrews Well Drilling to construct one (Name of Driller) water well at Chelsea River Road in (T)(Vqq9L) Wappinger (Location of Well) under provisions of Subpart 5-2 of Part 5 of the New York State Sanitary Code, subject to the following conditions: Within 30 days of the completion of water well >' construction, the applicant shall: 1) Pump the well until the water is clear; 2) Disinfect the well; '—_:} 3) Submit a Well Completion Report on a form provided by the Dutchess County Health Department. Items 1 and 2 should be completed in a accordance with the requirements of the Dutchess County Health Department. Date of Issue June 21, 19 91 Permit is Nbn—Transferrable Permit Expires December 20, 1991 HD- 241 4"Id.- A"J, '% , Pe it Issuing Offi ial DCHD-WWC WELL, COMPLETION REPORT FICE USE ONLY GAOUNDELEVATION It. DUTCHESS COUNTY • HEALTH DEPARTMENT w—� WELL COMPLETION22 MARKETSTREET, POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12601 rGRID DATE (914) 431-2044PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE PiW - -,1 STREET ADDRESS: OWN! TAX RID NUMBER: WELL LOCATION a NAME: : ADDRESS: ❑ PBIVATE WELL OWNER - , ^ yL ❑PUBLIC USE OF WELL ❑ RESIDEI4TIAL D PUBLIC SUPPLY ❑ AIR/COND./HEAT PUMP ❑ ABANDONED 1 - primary ❑ BUSINESS ❑ FARM _2�TESTIOBSERVATION ❑ OTHER (specify) 2 - secondary ❑ JJVDUSTRIAL ❑ ILISTITUTIONAL ❑ STAND-BY ❑ MOUNT OF USE YIELD SOUGHT gpm./NO. PEOPLE SERVED / EST. OF DAILY USAGE gal. REASON FOR ❑ NEW SUPPLY ❑ PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPLY �ESTIOBSERVATION DRILLING ❑ gEPLACE EXISTING SUPPLY ❑ DEEPEN EXISTING WELL DEPTH DATA WELL DEPTH I !, ft. I STATIC WATER LEVEL it.DATE MEASURED -SIS 0 DRILLING ❑ ROTARY ❑ COMPRESSED AIR PERCUSSION ❑ DUG EQUIPMENT ❑ WELL POINT ❑ CABLE PERCUSSION W OTHER (specify):;caQ•v 57f_!n WELL TYPESCREENED ❑ OPEN END CASING ❑ OPEN HOLE IN BEDROCK ❑ OTHER TOTAL LENGTH it. MATERIALS: ❑ STEEL ❑ PLASTIC ❑ OTHER LENGTH BELOW GRADE it. JOINTS: ❑ WELDED ❑ THREADED ❑ OTHER CASING DIAMETER in. SEAL: ❑ CEMENT GROUT ❑ BENTONITE ❑ OTHER DETAILS WEIGHT PER FOOT lb./it. I DRIVE SHOE: ❑ YES ❑ NO I LINER: 0 YES ❑ NO SCREEN DIAMETER (in) SLOT SIZE LENGTH (ft) DEPTH TO SCREEN (it) DEVELOPED? FIRST 0 1. — (.. ❑ YES NO DETAILS SECOND HOURS GRAVEL PACK o YES GRAVEL � OF PACDIAMETEK in. TOP DEPTH 1. (� ft, DEPTH M I ft. SIZE: - _ WELL YIELD TEST If detailed pumping 41�C If more detailed formation descriptions or sieve analyses WELL LOG are available, please attach. METHOD: ❑ PUMPED i tests were done Is n- i ❑ COMPRESSED AIR formation attached? DEPTH FROM Water SURFACE Well Dia- crop , ❑ gAlLEO ❑ QTHER ; ❑YES ❑ NO gear- ft. ft. '"o Ineter; FORMATION DESCRIPTION WELL DEPTH DURATION DRAWDOWN YIELD Land Surface ,I1 S,z+% .ti..� .X� Fir ft. hr. min. ft. gpm.:, ; IF AVAILABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE: - WATER ❑ CLEAR TEMP. QUALITY O CLOUDY HARDNESS ❑ COLORED ANALYZED? ❑YES ONO SITE MAP: A SITE MAP MUST BE ATTACHED SHOWING LOCATION OF WELL AND ANALYSIS ATTACHED? ❑YES ❑ No DISTANCES TO AT LEAST TWO LANDMARKS AND ANY POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES. PUMP INFORMATION WELL DRILLER NAMEDATE TYPE CAPACITY MAKER DEPTH ADDRESS. ��,,� �q �� � SIGNATURE _ `�" MODEL VOLTAGE HP / �(1�1�' `�� 2,0 4.0 Wil MEI 10. 12, 14 DRILL METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER WELL: PMW-3 DATE COMPLETED, 05/24/91 BYs ANDREWS WELL DRILLING TYPE: MONITORING ELEVATIONS: —3.8 [----nTOWN OF WAPPINGERS TOP OF CASING 66.550 CAP WITH LOCKING HASP CHELSEA RIVER ROAD GROUND SURFACE: 62,800 COUNTY, DUTCHESS STATEt NEW YORK —.0 GROUND SURFACE —0,5 .... . C CEMENT 0.0 2,0 FT, BROWN SAND, SOME SILT, + 4 TRACE CLAY, WOOD, SMALL ROOTS, + + + BENTONITE (FILL), MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE, + + + + + + + .00 INCH PROTECTIVE CASING tj -4 ..... . _2 7 '7 V 6.0 00 INCH PVC RISER 6.0 8.0 FT. BROWN -GREY FINE SAND, 7 V V V —1.5 SOME: SILT, TRACE FINE - MEDIUM + + rn GRAVEL, (TILL), MOTTLED, 7 v V V + + 2,0 8.00 INCH BORING (GM) 17 v v v . ... ... 2.0 + + 4.0 FT. BROWN SAND, SOME SILT, T: c: .... ..... .. WATER DEPTH: 2.63 LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), ++ S_ + 7 7; V - � DATE05/30/91 MOTTLED, MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE, 11- + + 8.0 9.0 FT. GREY SILT, SOME FINE ELEV1 63.87 . . . SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, (TILL), y v v v SAND DRY, MEDIUM DENSE - VERY DENSE. v p v v —<GM) V V V V ).o .. ... .. .... 9.0 10,0 FT, GREY SILT, SOME FINE v v vv rq SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, (TILL), v v v ri (GM) I ... ..... .. 10.0 - 15.0 FT. BEDROCK, GREY -BLACK SHALE --5,00 FOOT SCREEN WITH ENDCAP X + 4,0 In 4.0 - 6.0 FL BROWN -GREY FINE SAND, v v v v SOME SILT, TRACE FINE - MEDIUM 7 V V GRAVEL, (TILL), MOTTLED, V DRY, MEDIUM DENSE, v v v v (GM) 7 17 17 V INCH NX CORING ONITE TOTAL DEPTH = 15.00 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, GEOLOGISTt L. ZELLER JUNE, 1991 v v v v C 7 V V V 31 _2 7 '7 V 6.0 6.0 8.0 FT. BROWN -GREY FINE SAND, 7 V V V SOME: SILT, TRACE FINE - MEDIUM GRAVEL, (TILL), MOTTLED, 7 v V V DRY, MEDIUM DENSE. 8.00 INCH BORING (GM) 17 v v v �l 17 17 v vvv 7 7; V 8.0 9.0 FT. GREY SILT, SOME FINE SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, (TILL), y v v v SAND DRY, MEDIUM DENSE - VERY DENSE. v p v v —<GM) V V V V ).o .. ... .. .... 9.0 10,0 FT, GREY SILT, SOME FINE v v vv SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, (TILL), v v v DRY, MEDIUM DENSE - VERY DENSE. (GM) I ... ..... .. 10.0 - 15.0 FT. BEDROCK, GREY -BLACK SHALE INCH NX CORING ONITE TOTAL DEPTH = 15.00 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, GEOLOGISTt L. ZELLER JUNE, 1991 W - 2391 - Town of Wappinger a 0 F��r • Z • COUNTY OF DUTCHESS — DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PERM IT TO CONSTRUCT A WATER WELL This is a permit for Andrews Well Drilling to construct one (Name of Driller) water well at Chelsea River Road in (T)("I" Wappinger (Vocation of Well) a under provisions of Subpart 5-2 of Part 5 of the New York State Sanitary Code, subject to the following conditions: Within 30 days of the completion of water well construction, the applicant shall: 1) Pump the well until the water is clear; 2) Disinfect the well,; 3) Submit a Well Completion Report on a form provided by the Dutchess County Health Department. Items 1 and 2 should be completed in a accordance with the requirements of the Dutchess County Health Department. Date of Issue ,Tune 21, 19 Permit is Nbn-Transferrable Permit Expires December 20, 1991 HD- 241 Pdemit Issuing Official DCHD•wwc OFFICE USE ONLY NYS E UDUNO ELEVATION WELL COMPLETION REPORT tt. DUTCHESS COUNTY • HEALTH DEPARTMENT GRID —�---- WELL COMPLETION 22 MARKET STREET, POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12601 NO.N GATE (914) 431-2044 SOURCE PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE F}It cam) ( LOG. NO. (WELL LOCATION STREET ADDRESS: OWN/V A% GRIO NUMBER: • ; ' y , f. WELL OWNER�,�i,;�Z NAME: A DRES ❑ PBIVATE ❑ Pul3uc USE OF WELL ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ _UBLIC SUPPLY -E AIR/COND./HEAT PUMP ❑ ABANDONED 1 - primary ❑ BUSINESS ❑ FARM ❑ TEST/OBSERVATION ❑ OTHER (specify) 2 - secondary ❑ INDUSTRIAL ❑ I� STITUTIONAL ❑ ,NAND -BY ❑ MOUNT OF USE YIELD SOUGHT gpm./N0. PEOPLE SERVED / EST. OF DAILY USAGE gal. REASON FOR ❑ NEW SUPPLY ❑ PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPLY --"ST/OBSERVATION DRILLING ❑ $EPLACE EXISTING SUPPLY ❑ DEEPEN EXISTING WELL - h DEPTH DATA-7--=ft. --' WELL DEPTH -� "` ft. STATIC WATER LEVEL13. ` 16 ft. DATE -MEASURED DRILLING ❑ ROTARY ❑ COMPRESSED AIR PERCUSSION ❑ DUG EQUIPMENT ❑ WELL POINT ❑ CABLE PERCUSSION LAOTHER (specify): J1=.froom SF., /I WELL TYPE.aCREEt:ED ❑OPEN END CASING ❑ OPEN HOLE IN BEDROCK ❑OTHER TOTAL LENGTH ft. MATERIALS: ❑ STEEL ❑ PLASTIC ❑ OTHER LENGTH BELOW GRADE ft. JOINTS: ❑ WELDED ❑ THREADED ❑ OTHER CASING DETAILS DIAMETER in. SEAL: ❑ CEMENT GROUT ❑ BENTONITE ❑QTHER WEIGHT PER FOOT Ib./ft, DRIVE SHOE: ❑ YES ❑ NO LINER: ❑ YES ❑ NO SCREEN DIAMETER (in) SLOT SIZE LENGTH (it) DEPTH TO SCREEN (ft) DEVELOPED? FIRST �: J Lt r 11 ❑ YES ..Nm DETAILS SECOND I ;j ` -- HOURS GRAVEL PACK OYES 0 NO GRAVEL � _ DIAMETER � I TOP R l�• U BOTTOM DEPTH 6_il" ft. SIZE: OF PACT( --_ _ _ —in. DEPTH WELL YIELD TEST If detailed pumping t If more detailed formation descriptions or sieve analyses W ELL LOG are available, please attach. METHOD: ❑ PUMPED I tests were done is in - ❑ COMPRESSED AIR formation attached? DEPTH FROM Water well SURFACE Dia- MADE , D JAILED ❑.QTHER i ❑ YES ❑ NO Bear- it. I ft. Ing meter FORMATION DESCRIPTION WELL DEPTH DURATION DRAWDOWN YIELD Land anta ft. hr. min. ft. Qpm- IF AVAILABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE: WATER ❑ CLEAR TEMP. "} QUALITY ❑ CLOUDY HARDNESS •=' ❑ COLORED ANALYZED? DYES ❑ NO SITE MAP: A SITE MAP MUST BE ATTACHED SHOWING LOCATION OF WELL AND ANALYSIS ATTACHED? ❑ YES ❑ NO DISTANCES TO AT LEAST TWO LANDMARKS AND ANY POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES. PUMP INFORMATION TYPE CAPACITY WELL DRILLER NAME �l ��;;t ri J. Fj% t� ' DATE MAKER DEPTH MODEL VOLTAGE HP ADDRESS 1�sk «� ' SIGNATURE 2.0 4.0 6,0 DRILL METHODS HOLLOW STEM AUGER WELL PMW - 4 DATE C❑MPLETED� 05/22/91 BY+ ANDREWS WELL DRILLING TYPE: MONITORING ELEVATIONS: W A B TOWN OF WAPPINGERS TOP OF CASING= 67,680 CAP WITH CHELSEA RIVER ROADZW GROUND SURFACES 65,410 LOCKING HAS o= COUNTYc DUTCHESS o� STATE: NEW YORK m,n GROUND SURFACE — 0 6 CEMENT 0.0 - 2.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND, SOME + SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), ++ MOIST, LOUSE. �' + 6.00 INCH PROTECTIVE CASING + + + d (� 8 BENTONITE 2.0 - 4.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND; SOME 2.00 INCH PVC RISER SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), + + 2,0 +�.+ + + 8"�,+ _ 10 23 —3.0 MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE, + + —3.7 8.00 INCH BORING F } }, + + 4.0 D A 14 18 4.0 - 6.0 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, SOME SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), + + 5 M❑IST, MEDIUM DENSE. } ++ + z g 5.00 FOOT SCREEN WITH ENDCAP 4+ 11 A+ T6.7 6.0 - 8.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND, SOME LSAND + +6.0 + rn 29 IC SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), + } W - 2291 - Town of Wappinger !Avr T� ^.1 '{E R." • 3EPU a COUNTY OF DUTCHESS — DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A, WATER WELL -z-= This is a permit for Andrews Well Drilling to construct one (Name of DF ailer) water well, at Chelsea River Road in (T) (X�4$)j Wappinger i (Location of Well) under provisions of Subpart 5-2 of Part 5 of the New York State Sanitary Code, subject to the following conditions: Within 30 days of the completion of water well construction, the applicant shall: 1) Pump the well until the water is clear; 2) Disinfect the well; 3).Submit a Well Completion Report on a form provided by the Dutchess County Health Department. Items 1 and 2 should be completed in a accordance with the requirements of the Dutchess County Health Department. Date of Issue June 21, 19 91 Permit is Nan -Transferrable Permit Expires December 20, 1991 HD- 241 Permit Issuing Official DCHD•wwC WELL COMPLETION REPORT OFFICE USE ONLY NYS E GROUND ELEVATION 11, DUTCHESS COUNTY • HEALTH DEPARTMENT GRID WELL COMPLETION 22 MARKET STREET, POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12601 NO. N I DATE (914) 431-2044 SOUCE PLEASE PRINT DR TYPE _ ` •�4� LOGANO. LOCATION STREET ADDRESS: I OWNIVILLAGE/CITY TAX GRID NUMBER: WELL a� NAME: AODRES . Q PRgIVATE WELL OWNER --j /,� - ❑.PUBLIC ,-, ,. <.. ,� USE OF WELL ❑ RESIDENTIAL 6 PUBLIC SUPPLY ❑ AIR/COND./HEAT PUMP Cl ABANDONED 1 - primary ❑ BUSINESS ❑ FARM WjSTIOBSERVATION ❑ OTHER (specify) 2 - secondary ❑ JNDUSTRIAL ❑ TNSTITUTIONAL 0 RTAND-BY ❑ AMOUNT OF USE YIELD SOUGHT gpm./NO. PEOPLE SERVED / EST. OF DAILY USAGE gal. REASON FOR ❑ NEW SUPPLY ❑ PROVIDE. ADDITIONAL SUPPLY ._ ST/OBSERVATION # # DRILLING ❑ SEPLACE EXISTING SUPPLY ❑ DEEPEN EXISTING WELL DEPTH DATA WELL DEPTH _aC -'; ft. STATIC WATER LEVEL3 L 5 ft-1DATE MEASURED ' DRILLING ❑ ROTARY ❑ COMPRESSED AIR PERCUSSION ❑ DUG EQUIPMENT ❑WELL POINT 13 CABLE PERCUSSION ®OTHER (specify):N,lJcLv Tr -w WELL TYPE J k7lgCREENED ❑ OPEN END CASING ❑ OPEN HOLE IN BEDROCK ❑ OTHER TOTAL LENGTH ft. MATERIALS: ❑ STEEL ❑ PLASTIC ❑ OTHER LENGTH BELOW GRADE ft. JOINTS: ❑ WELDED ❑ THREADED ❑ OTHER CASING DIAMETER in. SEAL: ❑ CEMENT GROUT ❑ BENTONITE ❑OTHER DETAILS WEIGHT PER FOOT Ib./fL DRIVE SHOE: ❑ YES ❑ NO I LINER: ❑ YES ❑ NO SCREEN DIAMETER (in) SLOT SIZE LENGTH (ft) DEPTH TO SCREEN (ft) DEVELOPED? FIRST i L ! — !� ❑ YES��NO DETAILS SECOND HOURS GRAVEL PACT( NOES GRAVEL DIAMETER <% 0 TOP BOTTOM DEPTH fes~ O It. SIZE:: OF PACK in. DEPTH eft. WELL YIELD TEST If detailed pumping If more detailed formation descriptions or sieve analyses WELL LOG are available, please attach. METHOD: ❑ PUMPED tests were done is in- formation DEPTH FROMWater Weil ❑ COMPRESSED AIR , attached? SURFACE Bear- Dia- FORMATION DESCRIPTION CODE ❑ §AILED ❑ QTHER i ❑ YES ❑ NO ft. fl. �"g "ter In WELL DEPTH DURATION DRAWDOWN YIELD Sartace, ft. hr. min. ft, gpm- IF AVAILABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE: WATER ❑ CLEAR TEMP. QUALITY ❑ CLOUDY HARDNESS; ❑ COLORED ANALYZED? ❑ YES ❑ NO SITE MAP: A SITE MAP MUST BE ATTACHED SHOWING LOCATION OF WELL AND ANALYSIS ATTACHED? ❑ YES ❑ NO DISTANCES TO AT LEAST TWO LANDMARKS AND ANY POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES. PUMP INFORMATION TYPE CAPACITY WELL DRILLER NAME(/,,44,_4 �y/ DATE MAKERDEPTH MODEL VOLTAGE HPI ADDRESS pi SIGNATURE f " 74" 7 a/: �""` w Ilyi ti 1 �e i DRILL METHOD, HCILLOW STEM AUGER WELL PMW-5 DATE COMPLETED: 05/21/91 BY, ANDREWS WELL DRILLING TYPE: MONIT❑RING ELEVATIONS: TOWN OF WAPPINGERS TOP OF CASING, 68.020 -2.4 CAP WITH CHELSEA RIDGE ROAD GROUND SURFACE: 65.580 LOCKING HASP COUNTY, DUTCHESS STATE: NEW YORK GROUND SURFACE -.0 CEMENT 0,0 - 2.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND, SOME + 88+ 8.00 INCH BORING SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), + +S' + MOIST, LOOSE, + + 6.00 INCH PROTECTIVE CASING +R + + 20 a 2.0 - 4.0 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, SOME �+ + m v + SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (FILL), + + + + MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE. + + + 3 m ++ 4.0 r � 4,0 - 6.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND, SOME + + BENTONITE +. + SILT, LITTLE FINE GRAVEL, (PICU, d MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE, + + + + + 6.0 z 6.0 - 8.0 FT. BROWN FINE SAND, SOME A+ + 2.00 INCH PVL RISER SILT, LITTLE FINE - MEDIUM GRAVEL + + + (FILL), MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE. + + + + + 91) o 8,0 - 10,0 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, SOME. SILT, LITTLE FINE - MEDIUM ,+ ++ 90 0 GRAVEL, (FILL), MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE. + ++ a 10,0 ++++$+ 10.0 - 12.0 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, SOME g, SILT, LITTLE FINE - MEDIUM + + c� GRAVEL, (FILL), MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE. . + + i -11.0 SAND + a + + + 12,0 12.0 - 14,5 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, SOME + g+ SILT, LITTLE FINE - MEDIUM + + + GRAVEL, (FILL), MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE.+ + 13,5 5.00 FOOT SCREEN WITH ENDCAP + + 14,0 14.5 - 16.0 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, WATER DEPTH: 1.3,45 (LACUSTRINE), MOIST, LOOSE. (SP) DATE, 05/30/91 ELEV, 5457 15.0 16.0 - 17.0 FT, BROWN FINE SAND, -16.D (LACUSTRINE), MOIST, DENSE. (SP) 17,0 SAND - - 17.0 - 18.0 FT, GREY SILT, (LACUSTRINE) _= MOIST, LOOSE, (M018.0 18,0 - 20 FT. GREY SILT, (LACUSTRINE), - - _. - -_ - -18.0 MOIST, LOOSE, (ML) 20.0 -- 22.0 FT. GREY SILT, TRACE CLAY, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, (LACUSTRINE), MOIST, LOOSE, (ML) 22.0 - 23.5 FT. GREY SILT, SOME FINE _•_ _ BENTONITE SAND, (LACUSTRINE), _ ------- ___MOIST, MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE, (SM) _ _ -'-=,'=.23.5 Y+ 23.5 - 24.0 FT, GREY FINE -COARSE SAND + + 24,0 (LACUSTRINE), MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE,(SW 24.0 - 25.5 FT. GREY SILT AND FINE 7 V D 0 SAND, TRACE FINE - MEDIUM GRAVEL, 0 '7 0 V255 (TILL), MOIST, DENSE. (SM) 25.5 - 305 FT, BEDROCK, GREY -BLACK SHALE -25,5 3,00 INCHES NX CORING BENTONITE TOTAL DEPTH = 30.50 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. GE❑L❑GIST L. ZELLER JUNE, 1991 0 W - 2491 - Town of Wappinger i'S S Cp • COUNTY Of DUTCHESS — DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PERM i7 TO CONSTRUCT A, WATER WELL This is a permit for Andrews Well Drilling to construct one L. (Name of Driller) water well at Chelsea River Road in (T)OV�" Wappinger (Location of Well) under provisions of Subpart 5-2 of Part 5 of the New York State Sanitary Code, subject to the following conditions: Within 30 days of the completion of water well construction, the applicant shall: 1) Pump the well until the water is clear; 2) Disinfect the well; 3) Submit a Well Completion Report on a form provided by the Dutchess County Health Department. Items 1 and 2 should be completed in a accordance with the requirements of the Dutchess County Health Department. ~' e�J >" Date of Issue Tune 21, 1g 91 '= Pe t Issuing Official a� Permit is Nbn-Transferrable RR i Permit Expires December 20, 1991 p HD- 241 DCF4D•WWC WELL COMPLETION REPORT OFFICE USE ONLY NYS GROUNLEVATION DE E - t,• DUTCHESS COUNTY • HEALTH DEPARTMENT GRID �---- WELL 22 MARKET STREET, POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12601 N0 N COMPLETION (914) 431-2044 p SOURCE ~+ PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE I"ol w' -.7- [ LOG. NO. LOCATION STREET ADDRESS: OWNIVILLAGEI I Y TAX GRID NUMBER: WELL WELL OWNER DORE s: NAME 3 � d' 1 � ! ❑ PRIVATE ❑ PUBLIC USE OF WELL ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ &LIC SUPPLY ❑ AIR/COND./HEAT PUMP ❑ ABANDONED 1 - primary _ [3 BUSINESS ❑ FARM .tj';ffST/OBSERVATION ❑ OTHER(specify) 2 - secondary ❑ INDUSTRIAL ❑ INSTITUTIONAL ❑ ,NAND -BY ❑ MOUNT OF USE YIELD SOUGHT gpm./NO. PEOPLE SERVED / EST. OF DAILY USAGE gal. REASON FOR. ❑ NEW SUPPLY ❑ PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPLY _t ST/OBSERVATION DRILLING ❑ $EPLACE EXISTING SUPPLY ❑ DEEPEN EXISTING WELL DEPTH DATA WELL DEPTH ft. STATIC WATER LEVEL A. S _ ft. DATE MEASURED L A Z ` DRILLING ❑ROTARY ❑ COMPRESSED AIR PERCUSSION 13 DUG EQUIPMENT ❑ WELL POINT ❑ CABLE PERCUSSION OTHER (specify): Ifail,:., ; trr, jq f, WELL TYPE GREENED ❑ OPEN END CASING ❑ OPEN HOLE IN BEDROCK ❑ OTHER TOTAL LENGTH it, MATERIALS: ❑ STEEL ❑ PLASTIC ❑ OTHER LENGTH BELOW GRADE ft. JOINTS: ❑ WELDED ❑ THREADED ❑ OTHER CASING DIAMETER in. SEAL: ❑ CEMENT GROUT ❑ 6ENTONITE ❑QTHER DETAILS WEIGHT PER FOOT lb./ft. DRIVE SHOE: ❑ YES ❑ NO I LINER: ❑ YES ❑ NO DIAMETER (in) SLOT SIZE LENGTH (ft) DEPTH TO SCREEN (11) DEVELOPED? SCREEN DETAILS FIRST 0 ❑ YES , I SECOND HOURS 1 GRAVEL PACK 0 NU GRAVEL �� " DIAMETER ! TOP BOTTOM _- it. SIZE: —ft` OF PACK in. DEPTH 1t. DEPTH WELL YIELD TEST If detailed pumping If more detailed formation descriptions or sieve analyses WELL LOG are available, please attach. METHOD: ❑ PUMPED tests were done is in- ❑ COMPRESSED AIR formation attached? DEPTH.FAOM Water SURFACE Dia• ciioE , ❑ 2AILED ❑OTHER ; ❑ YES ❑ NO1t. Bear_ f!. Ing In FORMATION DESCRIPTION WELL DEPTH DURATION DRAWDOWN YIELDLLand Sartace ? '��- �� ft. hr. min. ft. 0M rY: IF AVAILABLE. PLEASE COMPLETE: WATER ❑ CLEAR TEMP. QUALITY ❑ CLOUDY HARDNESS ❑ COLORED ANALYZED? OYES ©Na SITE MAP: A SITE MAP MUST BE ATTACHED SHOWING LOCATION OF WELL AND ANALYSIS ATTACHED? ❑YES a No DISTANCES TO AT LEAST TWO LANDMARKS AND ANY POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES. PUMP INFORMATION WELL GRILLER NAME OATS , a W�,�p IGNATURE �j/�• TYPE CAPACITY MAKER DEPTH ADDRESS a�=e{,' � MODEL VOLTAGE HP FA- LT'l FFPT DRILLING SUAMARY Chazen Environmental Services (CES) supervised all drilling activities and performed an on-site evaluation of the subsurface geology. A total of 7 holes were drilled only 4 were completed into monitoring wells. These shallow soils wells were drilled by Andrews Well Drilling, Inc. of L.aGrangeville, New York. Wells completed by Andrews Well Drilling, Inc. were drilled using the hollow stern auger method. Soil samples were collected at various intervals using a 2 foot length split spoon. These samples were saved for further examination. Blow counts were recorded and shown on each log. Note: All depths provided in the following drilling summaries are depths belowground surface {lilts). Boring PM1V-1 May 28. 1991 Andrews Well Drilling, Inc. steam cleaned the rig, tools and augers before setting up on site. Drilling proceeded to a depth of 4 feet through sand, gravel and silt. At 4 feet auger refusal was meet in a very dry dense till. This hole was abandoned and filled in with bentonite. Boring PMW 2 May 24, 1991 The rig, tools and augers were steam cleaned and moved to the next location. Drilling proceeded to a depth of 14 feet through sand, gravel and silt. At 14 feet auger refusal was meet in a very dry dense till. The hole was abandoned and filled in with bentonite. Monitoring Well PAINV 3 May 23, 1991 The rig, tools and augers were steam cleaned and moved to the next Iocation. Drilling proceeded through sand, gravel and silt until bedrock was encountered at 10 feet. Once bedrock was encountered a 5 feet core sample was taken. Five feet of bentonite was placed at the bottom of the well to seal up the core hole made in the bedrock. Then 3.5 feet of sand was placed at the bottom of the well before the screen was set. Five feet of Schedule 4010 slot two inch PVC screen was installed along with riser. A sand pack was placed 1/2 foot above the screened interval and was sealed off with bentonite pellets. The well was finished with a I foot thick cement pad and 6 inch diameter protective steel casin& A royer cap and lock were added for further protection. Monitoring Well PMW-4 May 21, 1991 The rig, tools and augers were steam cleaned and moved to the neat location. Drilling proceeded through sand, gravel and silt until rock was encountered at 18 feet. At 18 feet we thought we were in bedrock and began coring. After coring 3.5 feet it was determined that we drilled through a boulder and had not yet encountered bedrock. Drilling continue to 27 feet through silt, sand and gravel. A twin well system (2 wells within the same boring) was installed so that monitoring from two different depths could be achieved. Dine feet of bentonite was placed in the bottom of the well to seal up the core hole. Then 2 feet of sand was placed at the bottom of the well before the screen was set. Five feet of schedu1�40 10 slot 2 inch PVC screen was installed along with riser. A sand pack was placed 1 foot 'above the screened interval and was sealed off with bentonite pellets. At the depth of 8.9 feet'sand was placed above the bentonite pellets, the sand acts as a base for the next screen. Five feet of schedule 40 10 slot 2 inch PVC screen was installed along with riser. A sand pack was placed 0.7 feet above the screened interval and sealed off with bentonite pellets. A 1 feet thick cement pad and 6 inch diameter steel casing with coyer cap and lock was installed to protect the well. Monitoring Well PMW-5 May 20, 1991 The rig, tools and auger were steam cleaned and moved to the next location. Drilling proceeded through sand, gravel and silt until bedrock was encountered at 26 feet. Once bedrock was encountered 5 foot core sample was taken. Seven and half feet of bentonite was placed at the bottom of the well to seal up the core hole. Then 2 feet of sand was placed at the bottom of the well before the screen was set. Five feet of schedule 40 10 slot 2 inch PVC screen was installed along with riser. A sand pack was placed 2 feet above the screened interval and sealed off with bentonite pellets. A 1 foot thick cement pad and 6 inch diameter steel casing with royer cap and lock was installed to protect the well. Andrews Well Drilling, Inc. steam cleaned the rig, tools and auger before leaving the site. Boring PMW-6 November 14, 1991 The rig, tools and augers were steam cleaned before setting up on site. Drilling proceeded to a depth of 23 feet through sand, gravel and silt. Auger refusal was meet at 23 feet when bedrock was encountered. Water as not encountered so the hole was abandoned and filled in with bentonite. All equipment was steam cleaned before leaving the site. Monitoring Well PMW-7 December 11, 1991 The rig, tools and augers were steam cleaned before setting up on site. Drilling proceeded to a depth of 7 feet through sand, gravel and silt. Auger refusal was meet at 7 feet when bedrock was encountered. One foot of sand was placed at the bottom of the well before the screen was set. Three feet of Schedule 40 10 slot two in inch PVC screen was installed along with riser. A sand pack was placed 1 foot above the screened interval and was sealed off with bentontite pellets. The well was finished with a 1 foot thick cement pad and 6 inch diameter protective steel casing. A royer cap and lock were added for further protection. All equipment was steam cleaned before leaving the site. APPENDIX B OVA Protocol and Data CGI Protocol and Data Well Development Protocol and Data Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. CALIBRATION PROCEDURES FOR PORTABLE PHOTOIONIZATION ANALYZER HNU MODEL PI 101 Instrument Summary The Trace Gas Analyzer is a portable instrument used to detect, measure, and provide a direct reading of the concentration of a variety of trace gases in many industrial or plant atmospheres. The analyzer measures the concentration in the atmosphere by photoionization. Photoionization occurs when an atom or molecule absorbs a photon of sufficient energy to release an electron and become a positive ion. This will occur when the ionization potential of the molecule in electron volts is less than the energy of the proton. The source of photons is an ultraviolet lamp with an energy of 10.2 eV. Gases enter through the inlet into the ion chamber and are exposed to photons emanating from the ultraviolet lamp. Ionization occurs for those molecules having ionization potentials near to or less than that of the lamp. A positive -biased polarizing electrode causes these positive ions to travel to a collector electrode in the chamber. The ions create an electrical current which is amplified and displayed on the meter. The meter readings are recorded in ppm (parts per million). The HNU is used to help determine the proper health and safety protocols when evaluating a hazardous site. Once a substance is identified, its hazardous properties can be determined using reference material. Note: Equipment description is from the instruction manual from the HNU Systems, Inc. The Chazen Companies Calibration Protocol for Portable Pholoionization Analyzer Page I of 2 Instrument Calibration Calibration procedures were taken from the HNU Instruction Manual written by HNU Systems, Inc. 1986. The calibration of the analyzer can be rapidly checked or adjusted by the use of the HNU standard calibration gas. The standard calibration gas is isobutylene. Isobutylen.e has a span setting of 9.8 and reads 56 ppm. The calibration gas consists of a mixture of isobutylene and zero air. Isobutylene is nontoxic and safe to use in confined areas. 1) Battery check - Turn the function switch to BATT. The needle should be in the green region. If not, recharge the battery. 2) Zero set - Turn the function switch to STANDBY. In this position the lamp is OFF and no signal is generated. Set the zero point with the ZERO set control. 3) Gas Calibration - Connect the analyzer to the regulator and cylinder with a short piece of tubing. It is important that the tubing be clean since contaminated tubing will effect the calibration readings. For calibrating with isobutylene, set the range at 0-20. Open valve on the gas cylinder and adjust the SPAN control setting as required to read the ppm concentration of the standard 56 ppm isobutylene. Keep valve open until a steady reading is obtained, then close valve on gas cylinder and disconnect analyzer. Calibration is now completed. The Chazen Companies Calibration Protocol for Portable Photaionization Analyzer Page 2 oj2 ... n{{y........... . U':.:v'if .}:..v. -. }...:;.. 4.. v`it\ .Yi..4{:' l:'} +i4i. h ...E. \..f. , t?� ..' F v . Fug iY9.>:t . :n_Yi✓'t::fi: =:r i.';v�': - .R"` .�}: y^: NFA`{x ,t.xx,.,:. ..•R:..a,: :.�- }} 3,.:: :L:,'x4'. x.�..:vF�'.``.:� t?N;fnn ..^ /.4?i#'' ,.{{.4:: ..a}:n.: n.:4f:,vtv.: ...�,�y{ :>: x::F :a: ... h. ' i .:v/ . - .J}: ;:..' �..�.. :>:'~;''>... ;,vim:' h;E: .. :.:fc:..:. . '�:: }R.4. -, - 4:72.: ay`.?:;, ..}r;t»?R: , .may .,•4i:' -. v :$;-.;.}: riy . '§ :#�: R:{'.,i:}}t:F.;ctR: :iir...J•:,t; r.�:'. .'\'Y:"'v'v..{4; ,Y ;xu..yy� ".i. 'f :::Y:::C:} :.S•v<:v 4'' ':r0:' :v:.s¢� .,,v. ': :kn.{, A:n'v'•!lr'�''•:yb cg "} `' „+{Jjt::`¢c.' ;S':y.::' ,:}•':<f:�fi':,,^w,2Ttr'ta ,{; '''.v�':' ' �y .n$ x #',7v :1:. ??F.,' ` ..t•. .v :"<'-','i:'< 4�.,.,}a.. a:•3 :?%}:> ,nr. 'v ..,.C`..a , iS.. `.h�¢�: :�t^•.: :2r:. <r 5'3.4.11 }fid. ,,G S ^:R:x:. . 1. � .`S�. n.�J[.` n:-} .. .: •}. �'�'+.'+ i�.: . '} '• •L�... :}:K�W' 4M. .}k .: �• .o IX.: .-,!{Lv.{.. :$::vL4.rY}J>q <.>:. .:ti:6.:,• '.l'�vjj;;i vvi};:.-Yt 'i}%4 .. 4., v 1:. n- v ..4: .; +,:l \ +v'' ,Y S2 ..N.+:v `<,.. :{�}' ,+.HI,`.. }\: �" •:i} ,{:... n._ -;,-,'•,b.,'t`_;.,'f4�'cs.3%`,• .:::ftk�a,?.h J.,,c8{'\f'C,:.. 'v+.•ryii:;°a,'.'.`4'•/F.".•,%ciia•,':ii..�tt5^:: ;r.?.y. ;%r.�',�c'd...•.�,,.' d �%'2i;C,'.w?:` :�: .xJ:`• .f +}:j;:�};' ..Sx..F.a :. :i:�G::c.�::.u}+:.�..dt. �:"�...£}w:c.H•:a: .aw}:.:w.. »•..}R:..; �, ,'r.�i`,}C•.t � ':y ac4L:n..;Y...}:.,.:�+.4.. ,#...`.F_ .. ::t. vo.,;:}k::i:•E c:}C ,7-+ l:Sf;:.iik.i::ar.:4:'Ll..f }.?: ,:%G u.}r��F?� ...a ':'<>a:r.'::F�.:'o "-}.•:cs>.tn, ...$ , Q%:::tirx:, _ `y.;f:y., .:.pry:; - '?S'£g tv�> : ^:}2'v; . `�tfilEa3:a:,{�s's:>:3:Y:t'hx .i:�K:�'•4' .ecat •:�: >'P'��x}:Fo. v*! . i.:44t4`. ti. 0'i}.L%.. :k}i:(�. :.:C•:..4.. B:RAT1fi7UR)µlrCkECE3 v't:J• rf:% `jf: �4r .??.4A.5'�},4`P :•J}7n .f: 5.... ' •4y}:.}:ti::4i ::4'A:'a:ti�•.: S.U:tJ:4 v :i):::. „C S: .•\ :?4:i4 " 4.:�J..Jv ..%:4::::>i:. ,.Ie. :'a?v:. R6 N:.-4. :JYi+ .::: Ca;LJ:• 3ii$nF`: ..4}.a:+�}'.: :tyi. .aF! •}:>� :ii .Fvnv�.. .n�'i :nv�.-:Yi.n .].:: :"J'::t:.vti::L.x.„tr.::c`~:'?:'v:?-:'w:.:"i44:in',' ,:•.,tit..,4...vn n�'¢¢ ::}} ;:.4::�' 'l.. ..t�: ta. .v}::^Otr-:4:�SSi} ^..i .: ' ..9' ::�nv}r :C":•:t}�:::G:v:n'Fv. �.., :•�' 4A. t?y`? �,,r .b:�'::-` ':2 •r;+F:.. ..a `$:ii.: .F fi.}:y}.x t`?y �(.::.vr.;:>:": ::::ff,�: .'4h, :hv :(::'w ax'::`:`:t.a .v.S::Jh :.. ,�;$•.+c.n:. .f}%4 .n� F v..xi'. .1:5n: v.� ..4.1 ,.,4r•.: -. <'j.^:.:r'.,,:v.� t,9.... :: r!�:.- r..rf pbt«`�c ih:::{::i..-?}.%...h....:. fh'^':,::,E'?.Y ...v.`.v :fv`��n a}:Fi.:r ;,}. n4• .w. :'.h'< :i>'{f` :. RLt N?:4}hx:,l ..C:B:"B':['::y rG:�.n:•: :}: .: �Ki>{}•4vvt4`ity :RT:;}3>: c'ac.:aa :a' r.:.hicv:'C:: •'7::-�:i:4.}' :F- ..'t.::-: „!•xoy..- :}x.:f:S.: ro^`:� o-,R.:g.»�cv.`:,if i. ,.4i..n}: "'.rx. ,a5::'i:%:,. 5/20/91 10:11 Span control setting 8.3 Background level in work area <1 ppm 5/21/91 8:35 Span control setting 8.15 Background level in work area < 1 ppm 5/22/91 9:45 Span control setting 7.1 Background level in work area < 1 ppm 5/23/91 11:42 Span control setting 7.9 Background level In work area < 1 ppm 12/11/91 10:30 Span control setting 8.22 Background level in work area < 1 ppm Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. CALIBRATION PROTOCOL FOR COMBINATION COMBUSTIBLE GAS/OXYGEN INDICATOR AND ALARM THRESHOLD GASTECH INC. MODEL 1214 Instrument Summary The GasTechtor Gas Alarm, a portable instrument, is used to help determine the proper health and safety protocols when evaluating a hazardous site. It is designed primarily to detect combustible gases and oxygen deficiencies in work spaces. It has the following capabilities: • Detect and indicate gas concentration up to the lower explosive limit; • Actuate a characteristic audible signal if gas concentrations exceed a preset level; • Analyze for oxygen over a range of 0 to 25%; ■ Actuate a different audible signal if oxygen concentrations drop below a preset level. The GasTech Inc. instruction manual gives the following description. Combustible gas detection is by a diffusion head containing a heated catalytic element and a matching reference element. Oxygen detection is by a second diffusion head containing an electrochemical oxygen cell. Samples are drawn into the instrument and over the detectors by means of a built-in pump. The unit is equiped with a solid-state amplifier which increases output of the sensors and gives adequate voltage to drive the meter and the alarm circuits. Power for the instrument is provided by a built-in rechargeable battery with sufficient capacity to operate for an entire working day. An audible alarm, active in both the combustibles and oxygen range, sounds whenever gas concentration reaches a preset level; additionally, a signal is given in case of malfunction or a dead battery. The Chazen Companies Calibration Protocol for Combination Gas/Oxygen Indicator and Alarm Threshold Page I o f 2 Instrument Calibration The following calibration procedures have been taken from the Gastech Inc. manual. A. Combustible Alarm Threshold The following steps should be carried out with the range switch in the LEL (out) position. 1) Turn LEL ZERO control to bring meter to desired alarm setting. 2) Turn ALARM threshold potentiometer to the point where alarm just operates. Clockwise rotation will lower alarm setting. Verify setting by turning LEL ZERO knob to bring meter needle in to and out of alarm zone. 3) To complete combustibles circuit settings, turn LEL ZERO control to bring meter needle to the zero position on the scale. B. Oxygen Alarm Threshold The following steps should be carried out with the range switch in OXY (in) position. 1) Turn OXY CAL knob to bring meter needle to desired alarm setting. 2) Locate oxygen alarm threshold potentiometer. Positioned on the oxygen circuit board, this can be reached through the foremost of the two clearance holes in the main circuit board. 3) Turn ALARM threshold potentiometer to the point where alarm just operates. Clockwise rotation will raise the alarm setting. Verify setting by turning OXY CAL control to bring meter needle in to and out of alarm zone. 4) To complete the oxygen circuit setting, turn the OXY CAL control as necessary to bring meter needle to the 21% position on the scale. The Chazen Companies Calibration Protocol for Combination Gas/Oxygen Indicator and Alarm Threshold Page 2 of 2 5/20/91 10:20 Instrument was calibrated for combustible gas and battery level was checked. 5/21/91 8:45 Instrument was calibrated for combustible gas and battery level was checked. 5/22/91 10:00 Instrument was calibrated for combustible gas and battery level was checked. 5/23/91 12:00 Instrument was calibrated for combustible gas and battery level was checked. 12/11/91 10:45 Instrument was calibrated for combustible gas and battery level was checked. Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. CHAZEN WELL DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOL FOR LOW YIELDING WELLS INCLUDING "J" TUBE AIR DEVELOPMENT 1) Record all information as listed on the well development field data sheet. 2) Determine and record the static water level and the depth to the bottom of the well. 3) Determine the volume of water present in the column by taking the difference between the static water level and the depth to the bottom of the well times the volume per foot of casing based on its diameter. 2.0" = 0.163 gals/ft. 4) The two inch diameter wells with a static water level of less than 29 feet from the top of the casing will be developed using the "J" Tube air lift system or high volume peristaltic pump. All equipment placed in the wells must be either steam cleaned or detergent washed and rinsed with deionized water prior to using in the well. 5) Evacuate the water column in the well five times. 6) Determine and record the pH and specific conductivity at least once during each evacuation. The final three conductivity readings should not vary by more than 10% and the last three pI-i readings should not vary by more than 0.3 units. The water must also be as clear as possible for the well to be considered developed, preferably less than 5 NTU. 7) Record the recovery rate of the well following the first evacuation. The next evacuation can begin as soon as the well has recovered to 90% of the original volume or after 24 hours. 8) Upon completion of development, the well is ready to be sampled. Since the water present in the column is representative of the formation water it can be sampled immediately once the well has sufficiently recovered: If it has not recovered, it can be sampled up to a maximum of 7 days from time of completion. WELL DEVELOPMENT FIELD SHEET DATE: • r LOCATI(T: 80 WELL ID: /1w) - CFIAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Inc. One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 {1. Depth to Bottom %� �J Technician Depth to Water Pump (type & ID) Water Column = ft Flow Rate x gal/ft Well Volume = • % �`f ;# of Volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume GALLONS (1.5'=0.092 2"=0.163: 2.5"=0.255 3"-0.500 4"=0.653 6"=1.569 8"=2.611) T7.r.w \h/elnr ! nrnl �1�1tn1 ❑H Conductivity zl,9Sf*jq lead 1�,Do r 90 ! J%: -s: r�13 oGt-' rJ -2, 75C !.:�o; 1,�•--` ;, ••�.;, _ 15.E �.J G 7�� I O..; 737 %acs --7 zl,9Sf*jq WELL DEVELOPMENT CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Inc. FIELD SHEET One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Technician Pump (type & ID) a < '! 14f Flow Rate of Volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume = GALLONS 0L5"a0.092 '`2';-0.163 2.5"=0.255 3"=0.500 4"=0.653 6"=1.469 8"=2.611) al1 1 Tema Wn1ar I PVPt Flow off Conductivity NOTES: J1 mid r jhj*'4 DATE:' LOCATION: WELL ID: Depth to Bottom Depth to Water `,,•,tom - Water Column =) ft x gal/fit Well Volume - • M'' i ' Technician Pump (type & ID) a < '! 14f Flow Rate of Volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume = GALLONS 0L5"a0.092 '`2';-0.163 2.5"=0.255 3"=0.500 4"=0.653 6"=1.469 8"=2.611) al1 1 Tema Wn1ar I PVPt Flow off Conductivity NOTES: J1 mid r jhj*'4 WELL DEVELOPMENT FIELD SHEET DATE: 'F"a -5 1 LOCATION: WELL. ID: Depth to Bottom t, Depth to Water - f S Water Column = ft x ;, ! ' gal/ft Well Volume Conductivity CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Inc. One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Technician Pump (type & ID) P, Flow Rate •r�_�� .� 1 of Volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume — GALLONS (1.5"0.092 2"0.163: 2.5"=0.255 3"=0.500 4"=0.653 6'=1.469 8"=2.611) nH Conductivity 3:0e . Y ', b;�� 11�. ;, L.16 l 7. 9S %. c7 Co 4 O 6+ � � ate- ll�r�rl � J. �`• �J.1 1t �I'•�f JAS I' �l•� "' rl:,. �I. �t `-'r 1 ! � ,%, f"� ? ��-� �. �.� �� � I � J/ TZ} r r4 ij'o. i it) I NOTES:-,��-jl.�nt� WELL DEVELOPMENT FIELD SHEET DATE: LOCATION: WELL ID: !n ki Depth to Bottom I Depth to Water - !! Water Column = ) it x gal/ft Well Volume of Volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume CHAZENENVIRONMENTAL SER ICES,nc. One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY Q603 l Technician Pump (type & ID) Flow Rate _ GALLONS (1.5'=0.082 2•=0.163 2.5"=0.255 3'=0.500 4'=0.653 6•.1.469 8•=2.611) Time Water Level Flow PH Conductivity NOTES: y4 5-7 '7.'�_; ILl,�7 C1,tA NOTES: y4 TELL DEVELOPMENT FIELD SHEET CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Inc. One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 DATE: - LOCATION: WELL ID: P ML4-) ' Depth to Bottom Technician Depth to Water Pump (type & 1D) : • ,. ? i . Water Column — ) ft Flow Rate ` X o') gal/ft well Volume = • 5 13 T of Volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume 1. 7 GALLONS (1.5"=0.092'�2'=0.163 2.5"=0.255 3'=0.500 4"=0.653 6'=1.464 8"=2.611) Tema \Nafor I oval F[n"v off Conductivity NOTES: ; I� 10 r U 1s1� 0 NOTES: ; I� WELL DEVELOPMENT FIELD SHEET DATE: (f - DO LOCATION: S' fp l ".4 IL WELL ID: •'1 SIM-�.J Depth to Bottom Depth to Water - fw, ;� =/` Water Column —• ft x O . I '_% -3 gal/ft Well Volume J'L;;� '✓ z of volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume - „I�, 7 $ CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Inc. One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Technician Pump (type &ID) Flow Rate _ GALLONS (1.5--0.0922'--�01 2,5"-0.255 =0.500 4"=0.653 6"*1.469 8'=2.611) T7mn 1hh+er 1 —.1 FI^kpj nH Conductivity NOTES: f cy4I } ve,(Y p ""-nj •'1 SIM-�.J V% ery 77 1 NOTES: f cy4I } ve,(Y p ""-nj `HELL DEVELOPMENT i MELD SHEET DATE: I)CATION: C r� S J eCLL ID:' i�l't1 I-'1 epth to Bottom 15 Depth to Water - y `f ater Column = a • -S.1 ft X CU I �-- 3 gal/ft Well Volume of Volumes to be Purged x Total Purge Volume n r CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVIC r.""" One Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12 Technician 7-K , ID/I Pump (type & ID) Sh"c -- Flow Hate _ "'- GALLONS 2"=0.1 3 .2.5"=0.255 3"=0.500 4"=0.653 6'=1.469 8"=2.611} --1 Mnlu nH Conductivity NOTES: 59-3 SLG 00 : ► { 5So foo 00 10 '1 15 5.S Io 30 3 " S. a? C )2 31- 13 )s . �, 13 oLl NOTES: APPENDIX C Well Sampling Protocols Sampling Chain of Custodies Analyses from On -Site Wells Chann Environmental Services. Inc. Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. SAMPLING PROTOCOL FOR WELLS WITH STATIC WATER LEVELS LESS THAN 30 FEET 1) Determine static water level with a water level indicated and record depth to water. Record reference point, i.e., casing, ground, etc. 2) Determine depth to bottom by lowering water level indicator to bottom. Record reference point. 3) Measure and record height of casing. 4) A clean sheet of plastic should be placed around the well to be sampled so that there is a clean surface on which to place sampling equipment. 6) Set up peristaltic pump. 6) Attach teflon tubing (designated for that boring) and start purging, using peristaltic pump. If boring is air rotary type (diameter 6-8 inches), use a submersible pump to purge. Pump should be cleaned before use. 7) Purge three volumes of the well as determined by diameter of the well and the difference between the static water level and the depth to bottom. Use the purging procedure appropriate for that well. 8) After purging, determine and record the static water level. Allow well to recover to 90% or greater of original water column depth. If recovery is proceeding slowly, go on to another well. The well must be allowed to recover before sampling, but the maximum allowable elapsed time between purging and sampling can not exceed 7 days. 9) Once the well has recovered, begin sampling from the bottom 1/3 of the water column. Record sample depth. Based on analyses to be performed, collect a sample in the properly preserved bottle, equal to 1/3 of the total required sample volume. Cap bottles securely. For volatile samples, fill 2 VOAS, making sure that there are no air bubbles present. If air bubbles are present, refill until they disappear. If well shows significant drawdown then the VOAS should be taken first. The Chazen Companies Sampling Prolocol forWells with Static Water Levels Less Than 30 Fee! Page 1 of 2 1.0) After collecting samples in bottles, collect in a clean bottle 1/3 of the bottle's total volume to be used later for taking field measurements. 11) Repeat steps 8 and 9 for the middle 1/3 and the upper 1/3 of the column. Record sample depths. 12) Determine and record the static water level after sampling. 13) Determine and record the pH, specific conductivity, and temperature of the sample taken for field measurements. 14) Upon completion of the sampling, place all tubing into a large plastic bag labeled for that particular well. 15) Pack and label all samples for analysis by an outside laboratory. The battle should be labeled with the site location, well T.D., date, time, sampler's T.D. and parameters. The Chazen Companies Sampling Protocol forWells with Static Water Levels Less Than 3O Feet Page 2 o f 2 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ., FIELD DATA SHEET SAMPLE DESCRIPTION LOCATION: (—A C e WELL ID: PM W _ 2 MATRIX: JOB #: NOTES: PURGE DATA START DATE: START TIME: DEPTH TO BOTTOM: GW SW Soil Other STOP DATE: STOP TIME: MEASURING POINT: ACTUALVOLUME \CALCULATE] VOLUME PURGE RATE (gpm): A = water lumn (bottom depth • wale( column) ELAPSED TIME (min): e = gal/ft PURGE VOLUME (gal) Ax B x 3 = Gallons to rgc 1.5" = 0.092 Gallons A r EQUIP. ID: PERSONNEL: gal/ft 4" = 0.653 r r Clear Slighl(y Turbid Turbid Odor No Odor 6" = 1,469 NOTES: ! a' = 2.611 ELEVATION DEPTH TO BOTTOM:. MEASURING POINT: �U L DATE TIME DEPTH/ELEVATION ELEVATION TYPE NOTES Purge Start (S) Purge Stop (D) 13:30 L72 Sample Start (D) Sample Stop (D) EQUIPMENT 1D: PERSONNEL: 11� NOTES: SAMPLE WELL#?I"\ (..,I) - 3 SAMPLE: (Well #,YY,MM,DD) FIELD DATE: 5 1 FIELD TIME: SAMPLE DEPTH: U M L Comp MEASURING POINT: METHOD: N S BL ,,'B) other EQUIP. ID: 13A. R Z N -Nitrogen P=Peristaltic S=Submersibte BL=Bladder 13=13ailer FIELD RESULTS PARAMETER Depth (ft) PERSONNEL: NOTES: pH Cond. Temp. WEATHER, C LAB REQUESTS LAB TITLE ANALYSES/METHOD # Tests TAT Request Last Date Date ell—, xo, n- - -9. TRANSPORTED VIA: C—E6 OA/QC: DATE: Replicate Field Blank WELL CONDITION & NOTES 4/89 k1k s� � W pU� a ?a oA E� 0 � H � u t z �o y E V1V 5 p f al v K 6 v � _ I [( 1( K�16 SE1I7OLITILE ORGIAICS IBALYSIS DAT! SUIT 315111EUTIALACID EI71ICTIBLE CDKP095DS Laboratory me: CIBO Laboratories. Ins. Sasple IB: Bethod Blani Client Base: Pagii and Bartin Date Collected: ProjectiNcility Bane: Cast':. Point Date Received: ' y� Suple bocat'on: D?te EItTIO d: 0• 1 htIiv rater Date ln"lczed: Method' EPA 629 Date Reported: ID -T-91 Detection Saipie Detection Saiple Licit Cone. Licit Cone. C01POUBD (ug/1) (ng1L) Q COBPOUBD NA) NOW ¢ bds{2-Cbloroetbyl) ether 1 10.0 ; 1 Q 1 1 4-3rosopbenyl-phenylether 1 10.0 1 l U l 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 10.0 ; ; Q 1 Pbenanthrene 1 10.0 ; l,d-Dicbiorobenzene 10.0 ; U Inthrcene ; I0.0 1 Q 1 Benzidine 40.0 U 1 Di-n-hntylphthalate 10.0 1 > U 1 ,2 -Dichlorobenzene ; 10.0 ; U ; ! rlooranthene ; 10.9 1 : Q 1 14-Dipbenylhydrazine ; 10.0 1 1 U 1 ; Pyrene : 10.0 1 1 U bis12-Chloroisopropyll ether 1 10.0 1 1 Q 1 i Butylbenzylphthalate 10.0 l U l B' Aitrosodisethylasine 1 10.0 1 : Q 1 ; 3,3'-Dichlorobeniidine 1 20.0 1 ; U B 6i#roso-di-n-propylaeine 1 10.0 ; i Q i i Benzofalantbracene 10.0 1 1 Q Herachloroethane 1 10.0 ; Q ; ! Chrysene 10.0 = U ) Bitrobenzene 1 10.0 1 1 U; bis(2-Ethylheayl) phthalate 1 10.0. 1 26 1 1 Isophorone i 10.0 ! 1 Q 1 1 Di-n-octylphthalate ; 10.0 i 1 Q 1 bis(2-Moroedoxy) nethane 10.0 1 ; Q 1 BenzoMfluoranthese 10.0 1 1 U 1 1.2,4-Trichlarobenzene 1 10.0 1 ; U; I BenzoMfluoranthene 10.0 1 = U 6aphtbalene 10.0 1 1 U; 1 Benzola)pyrene 1 10.0 1 ! U '. aeaacblorobntadiene 1 10.0 1 1 9 1 1 Indeno(1,2,1-cd)ryrene 1 10.0 1 l U; Eeaachlorocyclopentadiene 1 1D.0 1 ' U 1 1 Dibenz{a,h)anthracene IO.D 1 l U l Z-Cbloronaphthalene 1 10.0 1 l U l 1 Benzo{i,h,ilperyleae 1 1D.0 1 i U l Dinethylphthalate ; 10.0 1 Q. 1 Phenol 10.0 1 1 0 1 Aceaapthtylene 10.0 1 l U l 2-Kitrorbe1ai 1 10.0 1 U 1 2,6-Dinitrotaluene ! 10.0 1 1 U 1 4-witropben01 1 iO.D U Bexachlorobenzene 10.0 1 1 0 1 { 2.4-Dinitroahenol 1 90.0 '. l U l Incenaphthene 10.0 1 1 Q 1 1 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 90.0 1 Q 1 2,4-Dinitrotolaene 1 10.0 1 1 Q l 1 Peatachlaropbenol 1 50.0 Di.tbylphthalate 1 10.0 1 l U l 1 p-Cblaro=s-cr.sal 10.0 l U l 4-Cbloropaenyl-pbenylether 1 1D.0 1 1 Q 1 1 2-Cbloropbenai 1 10.0 1 l U l Plnorene 1 10.0 1 l Q l 2,4-DrchloraphEnol 1 10.0 1 l U R B' litrosodiphencluine (l) 1 10.0 1 1 Q 1 2.4,6-71ichlorophenol 1 10.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- 2,4-Dioethylph.nol ------------------------------------------------------- 1 10.0 1 1 Q 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Laboratory Name: CAVO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: Client flame: Paggie & 'Hartin Date Collected: Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Date Received: Sample Location: P13W-3 Date Analyzed: Matrix: Water Method: EPA 624 Date Reported: 4458-01 9-5-91 9-6-91 9-20-91 10-7-91 -� Detection Sample Limit Conc. COMPOUND (ug/L) (ug/L) Q ---------------------------------- Chloromethane 10.0 U ' Bromomethane ; 10.0 ; i U Vinyl Chloride ; 10.0 1, U Chloroethane 10.0 1 U Methylene Chloride ; 5.0 ; i U Trichlorofluoromethane 1 5.0 1 E U Trans-1,2-dichloreethylene ; 5.0 i U € 1,1-Dichloroethene 1 5.0 ; ; U 1.,1-Dichloroethane ; 5.0 1 U Dichlorodifluoromethane ; 5.0 1 It U 1 Chloroform ; 5.0 ; U 1,2-Dichloroethane i 5.0 1 U 1 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether ; 10.0 ; ; U 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ; 5.0 U Carbon Tetrachloride 1 5.0 i ; U ; Bromodichloromethane 1 5.0 U 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 1 ; U ' cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ; 5.0 1 U ' Trichloroethene 5.0 ; U 1 1 Dibromochloromethane 5.0 i i U i 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ; 5.0 ! U Benzene 5.0 ' U trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ; 5.0 ; i U ' Bromoform 1 5.0 U Tetrachloroethene 1 5.0 1 U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane ; 5.0 i 1 U Toluene : 5.0 ; 1 U Chlorobenzene 1 5.0 's U Ethylbenzene 1 5.0 Acrolein ; 100.0 U 1 Acrylonitrile 100.0 ; i U ,MNOUTI=1, OIG=.TICS I I"SIS DBT1 S'sil. 6156�86QihnLiGtID EiTybCTk'sLr< CSKPOQQD's l.ibar?tary Saw C31l0 Lab6r?tories, IDC. Client TaEe; iag i and Kartin ?rajettlFacilit. late: Castle ?pint sazple hocatian: PEN Katril: Tater Kethod; M 625 SseIlle iD: 4458-03 Date Collected: 9-5-9I Date leceived: 94-91 Date Bztracted: 9-8-91 Date hnalyzed: 9-141-91 Date fvorted: 10-1-9I Detection satple Detection iatple Licit Conc. Lltlt Caae. (GKPOQDD (100 {Il91L) 9 COKPODID N51 fDgA) 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - bis(2-Chloroeth i) ether - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! 10.0 1 ! 0 ! 4-; iroaghenyl-phenylether 1 10.0 ' 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene € 10.0 ! ! 0 € ?heaanthrene ! 10.0 1 € Q € I,4 -Dichlorobenzene 10.0 : D hnt6racene ! 10.0 € € D Beazidine ! 40.0 ! D ! ! Di-n-hatyiphtialate € 10.0 1 € D 1 41,2-Dicblarobeazeae ! 10.0 1 ! 0 ! ! Tlaarapthene € 10.0 ! € D 1 1,2-Dipbeaplhpdrazine € 10.0 € € D ! ! Pyrene ; 10.0 1 1 0 bis(2-Chloroi"prop 11) ether 1 10.0 1 ! 0 1 1 Batylhenzylphthalate ! 10.0 1 I D 1 -Hitrosadiaethylatine I 10.0 I 1 0 1 1 3X-Dichlorobeazidiae 1 20.0 I € 0 1 .-Kitroso-di-n-propylatiae 1 ID.O 1 I D 1 € Benzo(a)aathracese ) 10.0 1 1 D€ Relachlorcethane 1 10.0 1 1 0 1 I Chrysene 1 10.0 1 ! D I Kitrobenzene 1 10.0 1 1 Q 1 1 bis(2'Bthyllelyl) phthalate 1 10.0 € 19 I B€ Isopboraae ! 10.0 € 1 0 ! € Di-a-actylphthalate 1 10.0 1 € D € bis(2-Chloroetiozy) Whine € 10.0 1 ! Q ! Benzo(b)flnoranthene ! 10.0 1 1 D 1,2,4-Trichlorolseazeae 1 10.0 1 € D ! 1 Bea2a(tlflaoraatlese ] ID.O ! laphthalene 1 10.0 1 € D 1 1 Benzo(a)pyrens € 10.0 1 Itli lorobatadieae , 10.0 i € 0 1 ! lndena{1,2,3-cd]pyrene ! 10.0 € ! D 1 Enachlorocyclopeatadieae € 10.0 1 1 0 1 1 Dihenzla.hlaatbracene 1 10.0 •. I Q I € 2- Cblorolaphtbalene ! 10.0 1 € 0 ; 1 Benza{y,i,i]perpleae i 10.0 1 1 Q € I Diiethylphthalate I 10.0 1 1 0 1 Phenol € 10.0 1 1 0! € 6cenaptht7lene 10.0 i 2-Kitropbenol 1 10.0 € 1 0€ I 2,6-DinitratolIlene1 10.0 ! IDI 1 4-3itropbenal 1 10.0 ! 1 0 1 ] Deaachloro➢eat=ee ! 10.0 1 0 ! ! 2,4-riaitrophenol 7D.D 1 Q 1 hemphtheae ! 10.0 Q ! ! 4,6-rlIlatra-a-CIeSai ! SD.D 1 ! 7 ! 1 Z,1-thitrotalaene 1 10.0 ! 1 D 1 Peatichlorcpiesol ! Oieihylphthalate 1 10.0 1 7 1 1 p�:hlora-s-cresol € 10.0 1 € Q 1 1 4-Chlaropheayl-pheaplether 1 10.0 101 2-Chlaraphenai I 10.0 1 1 7 1 1 Maine 1 10.0 ] I Q! 1 2,d-Ditbloraphenol I I0.0 1 D 1 1 l-Ditrosodipbeaylaaine {Il 1 10.0 1 I D! ! LM -Trichlorophenol ! 10.0 1 1 Q 1 ----------------------------------------------------------- ! 2,4-Disethplpheacl 1 10.0 ! ! D CAMo LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 --------------------------------- - " ,,SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION , PARAMETERS ii --------------------------------i I ;I (01) i (02) 1 (03) i PMW-3 ; PMW-4 1 PMW-5 1 -Method 624 ------------------------------------ ---------- I---------- I----------1 Method 625 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------ Pesticides/PCB li * I * I * I -------------------------------------;I----------;-----------;----------I I Priority Pollutant Metals I------------------------------------ ;I---------- ;---------- ;----------1 Cyanide I; <0.02 ; <0.02 1 <0.02 1 -------------------------------------;1----------1----------;-----------; 1 Total Phenol 11 <0.01 1 <0.01 <0.01 1 I------------------------------------;;-----------;-------- ;---------- ; I Boron 11 0.1 1 0.2 I 0.1 1 --------------------------------------;;----------I-----------,----------; TKN 11 0.21. 1 0.57 1 0.18 I -------------------------------------;;----------I----------;----------; I Ammonia 1I <0.03 1 0.07 ; <0.03 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;--------- ---;----------; Nitrate ;; 0.11 <0.02 I 0.35 I ------------------------------------ ;;---------- 1---------- I----------; I BOD 11 <2 1 <2 I <2 ; ------------------------------------1;----------;--------=-;-----------1 COD 11 <5 1 <5 1 <5 I -------------------------------------1;-----------;-----------I---------- TOC tj ---------Toe11 2.9 1 1.7 ; 14. 1 ------------------------------------11----------1-;-----------1 I TDS ii 390 i 470 420 1 I------------------------------------ I;---------- 1---------- ;----------; Sulfate 11 100 ; 30 ; 32 I 1------------------------------------ ;I---------- I---------- ;----------I Aluminum 11 0.1 1 <0.1 1 <0.1 1 1------------------------------------ 1;---------- 1---------- I ----------I hexavalent Chromium 11 <0.05 I (0.05 1 <0.05 ; 1-------------------------------------;;----------;-----------!----------I Sodium 11 21 1 20 1------------------------------------ 1I---------- 1---------- 1----------I MBAS 11 0.05 1 <0.1 I <0.1 1 -------------------------------------;;---------- ---------- I -----------I NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. *See Attached Reports. Page 1 of 2 CAI -10 LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 ------- -----------------------------f;-_.. „ SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION f'-------------------------------- PARAMETERS' 11 ' (01) _ (02) (03) 11 PMW-3 i PMW-4 1 PMW-5 i I - Calcium--- 149 i 77 1 73 1 1------------------------------------ 1f---------- 1---------- ;----_-_-__; 1 Alkalinity (as CaCO(3)) 11 347 1 288 1 171 1 ------------------------11----------'----------1----------1 1 Color Pt/Co 11 70 1 35 1 15 1 ------------------;1----------1----------(----------1 Odor (TON) ;; 1 1 1 1 1 '------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- --------- Hardness (as CaCO(3)) 11 541 1 361 1 252 1-------------------------------------;1----------1----------1----------1 1 Chloride 11 14 ; <1 1 11 1 1 -----------------11----------1----------1-----------1 1 Iron i1 0.13 1 0.36 1 <0.05 1 -----------------i1-- -_--1______.-___1-___..__---1 1 Manganese ----- 11 1.5 1 3.2 1 0.33 1 1------------------------------------ ii---------- '---------- 1----------- ) 1 1 eH (m�11 531 1 553 1 526 1 ------------------------------------1 .___.-1-- ----_1__-__-____1 1 Turbidity (NTU) 11 31 1 188 1 68 1 ' ---------------------------------------1 1-------------------- '1----------1 I ' pH (Std.) 1i 7.0 1 7.5 1 6.7 i ------------------------------------11----------1----------;----------1 1 Magnesium 11 41 1 41 1 17 1 1--------- -------------------------------------------------1 1 FILTERED: ` '---------------------------------------------------------------------1 1 Aluminum 11 0.1 1 <0.1 1 <0.1 '---------------------------11----------1----------1----------1 1 Sodium 11 21 1 20 1 6 1 1-------------------------------------11----------1-----------1----------1 1 Calcium 11 139 1 76 1 62 1 1------------------------------------11----------1----------1----------1 1 Iron i1 0.06 1 0.26 1 <0.05 1 ----------11----------1----------1----------1 1 Manganese „ 0.41 1 3.0 1 0.31 1 1------------------------------------ 11---------- 1---_------1-_--------1 NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. CAVO LOG NO.: 91-09-4455 --- -- - ---------- - - - - - - -------------- ; 1 - -- --- ----_ „ SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS --------------------------------' (01) i (02) i (03) i ii PMW-3 'r PMW-4 i PMW-5 i UNFILTERED: ' --- ---------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Antimony ------------------ ;; (0.06 1 (0.06 i <0.05 ; ----------------;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Arsenic 11 <0.005 <0.005 ; (0.005 ---------- '---------- '---------- ! ------------------ Beryllium ;; <0.005 i <0.005 ; <0.005 -------------------- >;---------- -----------�----------- i Cadmium ;; (0.01 i (0.01 ; <0.01 : -tl--------------------j----------j Chromium ;; 0.01 0.01 <0.01 i ---- ----------; Copper H 0.01 0.01 (0.01 ---------- '---------- '--- -------j --------------------" Lead ;; (0.005 i <0.005 ; <0.005 ; ------------------------------------ ------------------ " --^---''-^---- Mercury <0.0002 ; <0.0002 < (0.0002 ; Nickel „ <0.05 , (0.05 ; (0.05 , F----------------------------- ---------- ----------j Selenium ;; (0.002 ; (0.002 ; <0.002 ; ----------------- ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- Silver ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 <0.01 It E. ---;;----------'----------'----------; Thallium „ <0.01 1 <0.01 ; <0.01 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- '---------- '---------- ; Zinc �; <0.01 ; (4.01 : (0.01 -----------------------;;----------;----------'------^---� NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise naiad. CAMO LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 ----------------------------------- !!SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS;;--------------------------------� (01) (02) I (03) PM'9-3 ; PTHN-4 PMW-5 ; FILTERED: ' '---------------------------------------------------------------------- Antimony 'I! <0.06 ; (0.06 ; (0.06 ----------------------------------=-;;----------;----------;---------- Arsenic A <0.005 0.005 ; <0.005 ; ---'-----------' Beryllium <0.005 , (0.005 , (0.005 , ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- ; ' Cadmium ;; (0.01 ; <0.01 ; (0.01 ; '------------------------------------- "---------- '---------- ;----------; Chromium ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; <0.01 ; ----------,---------------------; ------------------------------------" Copper ;; 0.01 0.01 ; 0.01 --------------------------------------; ; ----------; ----------; ---------- Lead ;; <0.005. ; (0.005 ; <0.005 ; '------------------------------------„----------;--------------------; Mercury ;; <0.0002 ; (0.0002 ; (0.0002 ; (------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- ; Nickel ;; <0.05 ; (0.05 ;. (0.05 ; ------------------------------------ ----------;----------- ;----------- ' Selenium ;; (0.002 ; (0.002 ; (0.002 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------------------------ Silver ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; (0.01 ------------------------------------ ---------- ;---------- ,----------; ' Thallium <0.01 ; <0.01 i <0.01 ; '------------------------------------;;----------I-----------;----------; Zinc ;; <0.01 ; (0.01 0.01 ------------------------------------; ---------- ,---------- ;----------; NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. 4458 9-5-91 9-5-91 9-8-91 9-17-91 10-7-91 E': 1'i; m PESTICIDES -iboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: lient Name: Paggi and Martin Date Collected: Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Date Received: Sample Location: Date Extracted: atrix: Water Date Analyzed: Date Reported: I----------------------------------------------------------- ;SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION PARAMETERS i-----------------------------� I 1 I (01) ; , (02) (0.3) 1 _ PMW-3 i PMW-4 i PMW-5 i I - Endosulfan 1 <0.05 ; <0.05 1 <0.05 , f ' , 1 It f€j II - Endosulfan 1, <0.10 1 <0.10 ; <0.10 1 l Endosulfan Sulfate ; <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 13 a - BHC ; <0.05 1 <0.05 ; <0.05 I 1 1 ' b - BHC ; <0.05 ; <0.05 1 <0.05 ; d - BHC <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ; I 1 �, 1 q - BHC <0.05 ; <0.05 ; <0.05 Is I Aldrin <0.05 1 <0.05 i <0.05 1 1 , Dieldrin ; <0.10 ; <0.10 1 <0.10 1 I 4,4' -DDE 1 <0.10 ; <0.10 ; <0.10 4,4' -DDD 1 <0.10 ; <0.10 <0.10 ; 1 9 k 4,4' -DDT i (0.10 i (0.10 i <0.10 It i i 1 1 Endrin <0.10 1 <0.10 i <0.10 i 1 Endrin Aldehyde ; <0.10 <0.10 ; <0.10 ; 1 I Heptachlor ; <0.05 1 <0.05 1 <0.05 ; Heptachlor Epoxide ; <0.05 <0.05 1 (0.05 ; k 1 Chlordane ; <0.50 1 <0.50 ; <0.50 It It i1 1 1 Toxaphene ; -.<1.0 1 <1.0 ; <1.-0 1 11 {I 1 1 ---------------------------1---------__-------'---------, NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. 4458 9-5-91 9-5-91 9-8-91 9-17-91 10-7-91 E': 1'i; m PCB'S aboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: Client Name: Paggie and Martin Date Collected: Droject/Facility Name: Castle Point Date Received: :ample Location: Date Analyzed: r,atrix: Water Date Reported• Method: PCB I ' ' PARAMETERS ; SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ; ------------------------------^i i{ (01) (02) ; (03) ; l PMW - 3 PMW - 4 ; PMW - 5 i ' Aroclor 1016 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; l I Aroclor 1221 ; <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ;. Aroclor 1232 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 <0.50 ; Aroclor 1242 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 , Aroclor 1248 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 i ( Aroclor 1254 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; Aroclor 1260 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.5 -------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. 4458 9-5-91 9-6--91 9-17-91 10-7-91 . W- Im CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FIELD DATA SHEET SAMPLE DESCRIPTION LOCATION: C A s -0e ('011-1-d WELL ID: p /H VJ + L% _ MATRIX: GW` SW Soil Other JOB #: NOTES: PURGE DATA _`gee START DATE: START TIME: DEPTH TO BOTTOM: ACTUAL VOLUME PURGE RATE (gpm): ELAPSED TIME (min): PURGE VOLUME (gal): EQUIP. ID: PERSONNEL: Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid NOTES: STOP DATE: STOP TIME: MEASURING POINT: CALCULATED VOLUME A = water column (bottom depth - water column) B = gal/ft A x B x 3 = Galions to Purge 1.5" = 0.092 Gallons2" = 0.1 gal/It 4" = 0.653 Odor No Odor ELEVATION DEPTHTO BOTTOM: / �• 00 MEASURING POINT: %a C DATE TIME DEPTH/ELEVATION ELEVATION TYPE NOTES Purge Start (S) Purge Stop (D) 9-5-.21 / R : y a /� �q' 7 Sample Start (D) 2-5-11 /3 Sample Stop (D) EQUIPMENT ID: PERSONNEL: _ NOTES: 6" = 1.469 B" = 2.611 SAMPLE WELL#: 1.,0E) SAMPLE: (Well #,YY,MM.DD) FIELD DATE: `` ` S FIELD TIME: SAMPLE DEPTH: U M L Comp MEASURING POINT: METHOD: N S BL J other EQUIP. ID: nArLtrj 1"rs-. N -Nitrogen P=Peristaltic S=Submersible BL -Bladder B=Bailer FIELD RESULTS PARAMETER Depth (ft) pH Cond. Temp. PERSONNEL: 7-17'WEATHER: NOTES: LAB REQUESTS i LAB TITLE ANALYSES/METHOD # Tests TAT Request Last Date Date U € `�J i�'r`+=lC t ilJV/t.�'�1'f}•1Gr :y`� CT TRANSPORTED VIA: L tS QA/OC: 1 DATE: r ��- Replicate Field Blank WELL CONDITION & NOTES 4/89 klk L u O „ vt �J 1 L M 4 V u Q C C Mr u u Y ••• C Y � C6 t ro vi „ <� yw�.a�t�Y�iCS:4i:•,y. ��f ��v • ` c�c n► � t ro vi „ _yIy)11^h£ 2-G1.I11:5 :11:,isiS IV II IB:£; ,c1S£fa£Qil;Lr'?C1D I.siE9["':.SL£ CGYPGDFDS Labmbry kale: USO L'abDiatOrieS, IDc. Client tale: raUi and Cartia Project/Facility tale: Castle Point Salple Location: PDA -4 Matrix: water lethod: "sFb 625 za:ole ?i: X456-02 Date Collected: 4-541 Date 1"eised: 9-c-41 Date Extracted: 44-41 Date lnalyzed: 9-12-91 Date 3eported: 10-7-41 Detection Salple Detection, Salple bilit Conc. lilit Conc. CGIFOu'", fugN (n91L) 4 COVOQSD ------------------------------------------------------------ NA) (DqN 4 ----------------------------------------------------------- bis(2-Chlorcetbyl) ether € i0.0 € € Q 1 1 4-Brolophenyl-phenglether 1 10.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene € 10.0 € I Q 1 f phenaathreoe € 10.0 1 € 0 1,4-91chlorobenzene € 10.0 € € 0 I anthracene € 10.0 Benzidine 40.0 € ; 0 € € Di-a-batylphthalate € 10.0 € Q 1 1,2-Dichlarohenzeae '; 10.0 1 € O I 1 Moranthene € 10.0 ) f 0 I 1,2-Dioheny1hydrazine ; 10.0 1 ; Q I 1 Pyrene € 10.0 € I 0 € bis(2-Chlcroisopropy11 ether ; 10.0 1i Q € I Batylhenzylpbthalate € 10.0 ; € 0 t-Bitrosodilethylaline 10.0 1 € Q ; € 3,31-DichlorobeuAire € 10.0 ) 0 I -kitrpso-di-n-propylaliDe € 10.0 1 ; Q € ; BeD70(a)Whracene I 10.0 bexachloroethaae IM 1 ; Q I € Chuserve titrobeaaene € 10.0 ; I Q € i bis12-£tbylheayl) phthalate ; 10.D ; M € 9 € Isophorone € 10.D € I Q I ' Di-n-oct?loltbalate ; 14.0 bis(2-Chloroethoxy) !ethane € 10.0 € € Q ; Beazo(hlflcoranthene ; 10.0 14,0rlchlorobenzene 10.0 € € Q I BeAzaWflimathene € 10.0 I € Q 1 taphthalene '; 10.0 I ; D € ; Benzofa)pyreae 10.0 1< € �exachlorobntadiene 10.0 I ; Q€ € Indeno€14.3-cd)pyrene I 10.0 1 I Q lexachlorocyclopeDtidieDe € 10.0 € ; Q € Dibenz(a,blaathrame € 10.0 € 0 2-Chloronaphthalene 70.0 1 € D € Beazalg,h,i)peryleae € 10.0 € € 0 Disethylphthalate 10.0 € € Q I Phenol € 10.0 € 1 0 lceoapthtylene 10.0 ; D I 2-kitmhenol 2,6-DiDitrotolpeee !, 10.0 ) € 0 'r € 4-5itmheaol i 10.0 3eaachlaro�enzene i 10.0 1 I 1 1 Q , 2., Diait;ppheap� I X0.0 ; 0 ; lueaaphthene 10.0 € € I I 4.6-Dinrtlo-o-cres�l € X0.0 1 i < € 2,4-niaitrotolnene 10.0 1 € II € i rentachlore tml I Diethylphthalate I 10.9 i 1 Q) I p -Chloro -l -cresol 4-Chloropheayl-;Genylether [ 10.0 1 ; Q ; 2 -Chlorophenol 10.0 Q F1DQreae € 1D.0 ; Q) 2,4-Dichloropaenol € 10.3 € Q I 3-? litrosodiphenylaline 11) 10.0 1 Q I 1 3,4.6 -Trichlorophenol € 10.0 I Q ----------------------------------------------------------- € 2,4-Dilet'�ylpheaol € 10.4 ; Q 1 SHEET VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA I Laboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 4458-02 Client Name: Paggie & Martin Date'Collected: 9-5-91 Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Date Received: 9-6-91 Sample Location: PMW-4 Date Analyzed: 9-20-91 Matrix: Water Method: EPA 624 Date Reported: 10-7-91 Detection Sample Limit Conc. COMPOUND (ug/L) (ug/L) Q Chloromethane 10.0 ; ; U Bromomethane 10.0 1 U 1 Vinyl Chloride 10.0 i U 1 Chloroethane ; 10.0 ; U Methylene Chloride 1 5.0 1 ; U ; Trichlorofluoromethane 1 5.0 ; ; U Trans--1,2-dichloroethylene ; 5.0 1 ; U 1,1-Dichloroethene ; 5.0 1 ; U ; 1,1-Dichloroethane ; 5.0 1 ; U ; Dichlorodifluoromethane ; 5.0 1 ; U ; Chloroform ; 5.0 It i U 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 1 5.0 ; U 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 10.0 ; ; U . 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 5.0 ; U Carbon Tetrachloride ; 5.0 ; i U Bromodichloromethane 5.0 1 U 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 1 5.0 U : cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 5.0 i 1 U Trichloroethene ; 5.0 i s U Dibromochloromethane ; 5.0 1 U 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 5.0 ; U Benzene 5.0 ; 1 U 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 5.0 i U Bromoform 5.0 1 U I Tetrachloroethene ; 5.0 l U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane ; 5.0 1 U Toluene 5.0 ; U ;. Chlorobenzene ; 5.0 ; U Ethylbenzene ; 5.0 1 U Acrolein 100.0 i U 1 Acrylonitrile ;. 100.0 U 1. CAHO LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 r -f rr; r• �� r'�'•;� _____________ _______________ !!SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ; PARAMETERS ;;--------------------------------; (01) ; (02) ; (03) ; PMK-3 ; PMW-4 ; PMW-5 ; Method 624 ------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- Method ---__ -_Method 625 --------------------- _------- ;---------- ;----------; ' Pesticides/PCB ;; � * ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- Priority --- -----Priority Pollutant Ketals ------------------------------------;;----------;----------- __--------; Cyanide ;; <0.02 ; <0.02 <0.02 ; ------------------------------------a';----------;----------;--------- Total Phenol • ;; (0.01 ; <0.01 ; <0.01 ; ------------------------------------H ---------- ;---------- ---------- Boron ;; 0.1 ; 0.2 ; 0.1 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; TKN ;; 0.21 ; 0.57 ; 0.18 ; ----------------------------------------------- ;---------- ;----------; Ammonia ;; (0.03 ; 0.07 ; <0.03 ; ------------------------------------;;----------;---------- -----; Nitrate ;; 0.11 ; <0.02 ; 0.35 ; -------=-----------------------------;;----------;-----------;----------; ; BOD ;; <2 ; <2 ; (2 ---------------------------------------;----------;--------;-------- ; Can ;; (5 <5 It ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; TOC ;; 2.9 ; 1.7 ; 1.4 ------------------------------------;;-----------6----------;----------; TDS ;; 390 ; 470 ; 420 -------------------------------------=i--------------------;-----------; Sulfate ;; 100 ;, 30 32 ; ------------------------------------;;----------,-----------;---------- Aluminum ;; 0.1 ; <0.1 ; <0.1 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Hexavalent Chromium ;; (0.05 ; 0.05 ; <0.05 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- _-----------; i Sodium ii 21 It 20 ; 8 ; s-------------------------------------; ;----------;----------;----=-----; KBAS j; 0.05 ; (0.1 (0.1 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- 5---------- _ NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. *See Attached Reports. Page 1 of 2 CRMO LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 - - ------ --- -- --_ - ' €€SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION € , ' PARAMETERS €€-----`--------------------------' ' {€ (01) € (02) € (03) , € € PMW--3 1 PMW-4 € PMW-5 ; € Calcium 1€ 149 It 77 € 73 € -------------------------------------;;----------I----------€---=------€ € Alkalinity (as CaeO(3)) ;€ 347 € 288 € 171 € €------------------------------------ €€---------- €------ ----;----------€ € Color Pt/Co I€ 70 € 35 { 15 I €------------------------------------ € € , , € Odor (TON) €€ 1 € 1 € i € ------------------------------------ ---------------- € Hardness (as CaCO(3)) €'€ 541 ; 361 € 252 { €------------------------------------ €€---------- {---------- €-----------€ Chloride €€ 14 It <1 ; 11 { €------------------------------------ €€-------- --€---------- )----------€ € Iron €€ 0.13 1 0.36 ; <0.05 € {------------------------------------€;----------{----------€----------{ € Manganese '„ 1.5 € 3.2 € 0.33 I €--------------------------------------- € €----------- €---------- €----------- { € eH (mv) €€ 531 € 553 € 526 € €------------------------------------€;-------- ,---------- €----------€ € Turbidity (NTU) I) 31 { 188 € 68 € -------------------------------------€€----------',-----------€----------€ € pH (Std.) €€ 7.0 € 7.5 € 6.7 € {------------------------------------€€----------€----------{----------€ 1 Magnesium €€ 41 € 41 ; 17 € €-----------------------------------------------------------------------€ € FILTERED: € -----------------------------------------------------------------------€ € Aluminum €€ 0.1 € <0.1 € <0.1 € ------------------------------------{€----------;-----------€-----------€ Sodium €€ 21 ; 20 6 ; €------------------------------------; €----------;---------- € ---------- Calcium ------ -Calcium €€ 139 € 76 € 62 € €----------------�-------------�-------;I---------- €-=---------€---------- € € Iron ;i 0.06 € 0.26 ( <0.05 {------------------------------------€€----------;-----------€----------{ € Manganese €€ 0.41 € 3.0 ; 0.31 ; €------------------------------------€€----------;----------€----------; NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. CARO LOG NO.: 91-09-4453 ------------------------------------------ '; SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i , PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS ;;--------------------------------; (01) ; (02) ; (03) ; PMW-3 ; PMW-4 ; PMW-5 ; UNFILTERED: , ' '--------------------------------------------------------------------' ;- Antimony ;; <0.06 ; (0.06 ; <0.06 ! ------------------------------------ ;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Arsenic ;; (0.005 ; (0.005 ; (0.005 ; ------------------------------------;i-------------------------------_ Beryllium l; (0.005 ; <0.005 ; <0.005 ; ---------------------------------------' '----------'-----------'----------' ' Cadmium ;; (0.01 ; <0.01 ; (0.01 i s ----------------------------------------; i ---------- -----------;---------- � Chromium t'; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; <0.01 ; ------------------------------------ ;,---------- ,---------- ;----------; Copper ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 (0.01 ; ------------------------------------ ----------;---------- ---------- Lead ;; <0.005 <0.005 (0.005 ; -------------------------------------;;----------i---------- ----------; Mercury ;; <0.0002 (0.0002 ; (0.0002 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- Nickel ;; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; (0.05 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- ; Selenium ;;(0.002 ; (0.002 ; (0.002 ; ------------------------------------;;-----------;---------- Silver ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 <0.01 ; ------------------------------------;;-------------------- ;----------� Thallium ;; <0.01 ; (0.01 ; <0.01 ; j------------------------------------jj---------- i----------�----------j Zinc ;; <0.01 ; <0.01 ; (0.01 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;----------;--------- ' NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. ICAMO LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ;;SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 1 � ' '--------------------------- ----' PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS,� --- � 1i (01) (02) : (03) i i 1 i P1,174-3 PHV-4 1 PMV-5 1 i FILTERED: Is ----------------------------------_--------------------------------------1 Antimony 11 <0.06 1 (0.06 1 <0.06 ------------------------------------;;------------1-=--------1----------1 Arsenic 11 <0.005 1 (0.005 1 <0.005 1 ------------------------------------11----------1----------;----------' Beryllium ;< <0.005 1 (0.005 ; <0.005 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ,---------- ;----------1 Cadmium ;:, (0.01 ; <0.01 ; <0.01 ; -------------------------------------;;--------=-;----------1----------1 Chromium ;; 0.01 1 0.01 1 <0.01 1 ------------------------------------;-----------;----------;----------1 1 Copper 11 0.01 0.01 ; 0.01 ; ------------------------------------;;----------;----------;----------1 1 Lead {; (0.005 1 (0.005 (0.005 ; 1------------------------------------1i----------1----------;----------1 i Mercury 11 (0.0002 1 <0.0002 1 (0.0002 1 1-------------------------------------11----------1----------;----------' 1 Nickel 11 <0.05 1 <0.05 i (0.05 1 ------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- 1 1 Selenium i1 (0.002 1 (0.002 1 (0.002 1 1------------------------------------11----------1----------1----------' 1 Silver 11 0.01 1 0.01 1 (0.01 1 1------------------------------------11----------1-------- 1----------1 1 Thallium 11 <0.01 (0.01 1 (0.01 1 1------------------------------------11----------1----------1----------1 1 Zinc 11 <0.01 1 (0.01 1 0.01 1 1------------------------------------11----------1----------1----------1 NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. 4458 9-5-91 9-5-91 9-8-91 9-17-91 10-7-91 Y'- PESTICIDES laboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample'ID: lient Name: Paggi and Martin Date Collected: rroject/Facility Name: Castle Point Date Received: Sample Location: Date Extracted: atrix: Water Date Analyzed: Date Reported: !SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i PARAMETERS 1-----^-----------------------1 1 (01) i (02) i (03) 1 s 1 i 'PMW-3 1 PMW-4 1 PMW-5 i I I 1 I 1 1 I- Endosulfan <0.05 1 <0.05 1 <0.05 1 1 II - Endosulfan 1 <0.10 <0.10 1 <0.10 1 i i i i i 1 Endosulfan sulfate 1 <0.10 1 <0.10 I <0.10 1 I 1 1 I 1 l a- BHC 1 <0.05 1 <0.05 1 (0.05 1 i i i i i 1 b- BHC 1 <0.05 ', <0.05 i <0.05 1 1 d- BHC ; <0.05 1 (0.05 1 <0.05 1 1 i i i i g- BHC i <0.05 1 <0.05 i <0.05 i i i I i i 1 Aldrin I <0.05 1 <0.05 1 (0.05 I i i i I i 1 Dieldrin 1 <0.10 I <0.10 1 (0.10 I i I 4,4' -DDE 1 <0.10 1 (0.10 1 <0.10 1 1 1 I ! t 1 4,4' -DDD 1 (0.10 1 <0.10 1 <0.10 1 I 1 I I 1 4,4' -DDT 1 <0.10 1 <0.10 1 <0.10 1 1 I I I 1 1 Endrin 1 <0.10 1 <0.10 I <0.10. 1 I 1' Endrin Aldehyde 1 (0.10 I <0.10 1 <0.10 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 Heptachlor 1 (0.05 1 (0.05 1 <0.05 I i i i i i Heptachlor Epoxide 1 <0.05 1 (0.05 I <0.05 I 1 Chlordane 1 <0.50 1 <0.50 1 <0.50 1 i i i i i 1 Toxaphene 1 <1.0 1 <1.0 1 <1.0 1 1 11 11 1 i ---------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. 4458 9-5-91 9-5-91 9-8-91 9-17-91 10-7-91 Y'- PCB 'S aboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. ..lient Name: Paggie and Martin Project/Facility Name: Castle Point ample Location: atria: Vater Method: PCB Sample ID: Date Collected: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Date Reported: ------------------------------------------- ( PARAMETERS ; SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i ------------------------------- (01) i (02) (03) 1 PMA - 3 ; PMV - 4 ' , PMV - 5 Aroclor 1016 ' , <0.50 ;, <0.50 <0.50 ; , Aroclor 1221 < <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; Aroclor 1232 ; <0.50 1 <0.50 r ; ; <0.50It ' 1 i Aroclor 1242 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 It <0.50 It i � I I � Aroclor 1248 <0.50 ; <0.50 <0.50 It I Aroclor 1254 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 iIt I ' Aroclor 1260 <0.50 I i <0.50 i e <0.5 ! ' I NOTE: All results expressed in uVA unless noted otherwise. 4458 9-5-91 9-6-91 9-17-91 10-7-91 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FIELD DATA SHEET SAMPLE DESCRIPTION }� LOCATION: C.AS TIC WELL ID: P/n� " �' MATRIX: GW� SW Soil Other JOB #: NOTES: PURGE DATA See me"' '-) START DATE: STOP DATE: i START TIME: STOP TIME: DEPTH TO BOTTOM: ACTUAL VOLUME PURGE RATE (gpm): , ELAPSED TIME (min): PURGE VOLUME (gal): EQUIP. ID: PERSONNEL: Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid NOTES: MEASURING POINT: CALCULATED VOLUME A = water column (bottom depth . water column) a = gal/ft \A x 8 x 3 = Gallons to Purge e. Gallons Odor No Odor 1.5" = 0.092 gal/11 4' = 0.653 6' = 1.469 8" = 2.691 i i. ELEVATION i DEPTH TO BOTTOM: MEASURING POINT: DATE TIME DEPTH/ELEVATION ELEVATION TYPE NOTES Purge Start (S) Purge Stop (D) Sample Start (D) )(A Sample Stop (D) EQUIPMENT ID: PERSONNEL: NOTES: W04 SAMPLE _ WELL #: SAMPLE: (Well #,YY,MM,DD) FIELD DATE: _ FIELD TIME: I S ' C ) SAMPLE DEPTH: U M L Comp MEASURING POINT: METHOD: N P ; S BL other EQUIP. ID: 6A-rc e - rr-%SIS • r?U mP N -Nitrogen P=Peristaltic S=Submersible BL -Bladder B=Baiter FIELD RESULTS PARAMETER Depth (ft) pH Cond. Temp. j;:)11, a; PERSONNEL: WEATHER: NOTES: LAB REQUESTS LAB TITLE ANALYSES/METHOD # Tests TAT Request Last Date Date 'N 0 t� c {�`�4' >!� i. � / r� r t , Cir• ! ,'v'll . TRANSPORTED VIA: QA/QC: DATE: Replicate OA Field Blank N WELL CONDITION & NOTES 4/89 klk W Q tea]% W A W 0 U P4 H .4 t �? s� � Q C. C v Yyy ( O ~ � _ o, b y 4 4 3 w+ C u x $g (n+ V O w r �+ O A. H J Al C. C v Yyy ( O ~ � 5 o, b y 4 V O w r �+ O A. H J Al -19 } t} r �iM ;ii x 2E = (+ VI CPT, 3._ � VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sample Laboratory (dame: CA330 Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 4458-03 Client Name: Paggie & Martin Date Collected: 9-5-91 Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Date Received: 9-6-91 Sample Location: PMW-5 Date Analyzed: 9-20-91 Matrix: Water Bromomethane ; 10.0 Method: EPA 624 1 U Date Reported: 10-7-91 CPT, 3._ � Detection Sample Limit Conc. COMPOUND (ug/L) (ug/L) Q ------------------ Chloromethane 10.0 i 1 U Bromomethane ; 10.0 i 1 U Vinyl Chloride ; 10.0 U Chloroethane 10.0 ; U Methylene Chloride 5-0 U Trichlorofluoromethane ; 5-0 ; U Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene ; 5.0 i U 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 U 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 U 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ; 5.0 1 U Chloroform 5.0 ; ; U 1,2-Dichloroethane ; 5.0 ; ; U 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 10.0 ; 1 U I 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane. 5.0 ; i U Carbon Tetrachloride 5-0 U ; Bromodichloromethane ; 5•0 ; U 1,2-Dichloropropane 5-0 I U cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 1 U s Trichloroethene 5.0 + U Dibromochloromethane : 5.0 , U 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ; 5.0 ; U ' Benzene 5.0 ' ' U trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ; 5-0 i U ' Bromoform It5.0 ( U Tetrachloroethene ; 5.0 U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane ; 5.0 U ' Toluene 5-0 { U Chlorobenzene { 5.0 U ' Ethylbenzene ; 5.0 = U { Acrolein 100.0 U Acrylonitrile ---------------------------------------------------------------- ; 100.0 i U CPT, 3._ � SEl17114,M,E ONUICS IMMIS ue1? SEEE•: USE01HU LI'VICID BINICNIBLZ MPOMS labaratory rtaw CABG Laboratories. Inc. Saeple ID: 4456-03 Client late: Falpi and larth Date Collected: 9-5-91 FroiectlPacility late: Castle Paint Date ?eceised: 3-5-91 Satple location: 71(>i-5 Date Extracted: 91-31 Gatriz: Fater Date laalyred: 9-12-91 Detbod: EFl 625 Date 2eported: 10-7-91 Detection Satple licit Cant. ;etection (------(ug11) ---C.....DD--------- bis(24110roethyl) ether I 10.0 I 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 10.0 1 l,d-Dichlorabensene 10.0 I 1 Bearidine 40.0 I 1,2-Bichlorobeateae 10.0 I I I 1,2-Diphenglhgdraiine 1 10.0 1 bis(2-Chloroisonropyl) ether ; 10.0 r-litrosaditethylaiine 1 10.0 likrosa-di-n-propglatine I 10.0 ; r I Bexachloroethane 1 10.0 I litrobenzene 10.D 1 I Isaphorone i 10.0 I bis(2-thloroethoxyl eethaae 1 10.0 1 a! ; I,2,4-I'riehloroSenzEne 1 10.0 I laphtbalene 1 10.0 1 3exachlorobatadiene I 10.0 I Bexachlorocyclogeatadiene ( 10.0 I 2-Chloranaphthalene 1 10.0 1 { Diletbylphthalate i 10.0 icenaptMyleu 10.0 1 Z,5-Diaitrotolueee ! I0.0 ! 1 Fexachlorobesrene 1 10.0 { Imeeaphthene 1 D 1 ?,4-9iLit TOUl ene 10.0 Dietbylphthalate I 10.0 . 4-Cblarankeapi-pheapirtbar x0.0 Fluorene 10.0 ? l-3itrasodipheaylatine (1) -------------------------------------------------- 10.0 ;etection Sakgle 1itit cane. 4 CUP0011D ------------------------------------9---------------------- (n 111 (04111 4 ----- D ; ; 4-3ra:ophenel-phenyie#her ; 10.0 1 1 I D 1 Phenanthrene 10.0 ': 1 D ; I D; 1 lathtacene 10.0 D ; ; Di-a-bntylphthalate 10.D ! ; D I D ; Flaoraatbeee 10.0 i D It IDI I Pyrene 1 10.0 I 1 D 1 D I I Butylbenrylphthalate 1 10.0 I 1 D 1 IDI 1 3,3'-Dichlorobenridine 1 30.0 I I D I 1 0 1 I Benm(alanthracene 1 10.0 1 l D 1 l d 1 I chryseae : 10.0 I I D I I U; I bis(2-&thglhexyll phthalate I 10.0 48 ; B 1 I D I I Di-n-octylphthaiate 1 10.0 I 1 D; 1 D 1 I Benro(b)flaoranthene 1 10.0 I I D I 1 D 1 1 Beazo(k)fIuorantheue 1 10.0 1 I D I 1 D 1 ; Benzo(alggrene '; 10.0 1 i D; D l 1 Iadeno(1,Z,3-cdlpyrene 1 10.0 I I D I IDI 1 Diben?;a,blanthracene 1 10.0 I I D I 3ealo(q,h,i)perylene 1 10.0 1 1 D 1 # 3 1 1 Phenol 1 10.0 1 D I I D 1 1 2-aitropbenol I x0.0 1 D 1 1 4-litrophenol D !, 2,4-DinitropheEci ; ! ' 4.5-Dinitra-o-^resoi 90.6 D � ; 0 1 ! Fentachlarophenol I `.0.0 1 J! ; D; � p-Cb10Ia-t-cresol 1 iD.D i I D; D , , , zhlaropheaol i , D D l ; ?,4-Dichlorophenal ; I0.0 i D; i 2,4,s-"richloranheaal 1 i0.0 ? ; D i ------ I 2,4-Dieetbylphenol CAISO LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 ------------------------------------i----------_ i „SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i { PARAMETERS ii--..------------------------------{ (01) i (02) i (03) i { { PMW-3 { PITT -4 1 Pxv-5 i { I4ethod 624 ------------------------------------ ---------- ----------'---------- { Method 625 ii * It * i * i -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- i Pesticides/PCB it, It ---------------------;{---------- {---------- i ---------- i i Priority Pollutant Metals ------ii----------i----------i---------- i i Cyanide ii <0.02 i <0.02 i <0.02 i ----'---------- '---------- ' { Total Phenol ii <0.01 i <0.01 It <0.01 i ------i{----------'----------'----------{ { Boron „ 0.1 0.2 r 0.1 i - ' ---------- '---------- ' i TION 0.21 i 0.57 i 0.18 i r------{i-- --{----------i----------{ i Ammonia {i <0.03 r 0.07 i <0.03 { -i{----------'----------i---------- i Nitrate ii 0.11 i <0.02; 0.35 i ---'---------- '---------- { ' $OD{{ <2 { <2 i <2 i i i COD ii <5 i <5 <5 , ---- "-------------------- ---------- i TOC ,r 2.9 i 1.7 r 1.4 r ----------------------------- _______ii---------- {---------- { TDS i{ 390 i 470 i 420 { -------------------------- ----------{i----------;----------i----------i i Sulfate ii 100 { 30 It 32 i i------------------------------------ ii---------- i---------- ;----------i i Aluminum ii 0.1 i <0.1 i <0.1 i {------------------------------------ i{---------- {---------- {----------i { Hexavalent Chromium it <0.05 i <0.05 i <0.05 i ------------------------------------ ---------- I ---------- ---------- i ' Sodium -ii 21 i 20 i 8 ---- {i----------;----------{----------{ i MBAS --- ii 0.05 i <0.1 i (0.1 i ------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- I ---------- i NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. *See Attached Reports. Page 1 of 2 CAI -10 LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 r t S • •••• Y•M tl �� L. 1 ------- ---- -- - - - _ - - - ----- r ; );SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i { PARA14ETERS H -------------------------------- It (01) i (02) ; (03) '. PMW-3 1 PMW-4 1 PMW-5 It ; Calcium 149 ; 77 ; 73 ------------------------------------;;---------- ---------- ;----------; Alkalinity (as CaCO(3)) - ;; 347 ; 288 1 171 ; ------------,---------H ----------;----------;--------- Color Pt/Co ;; 70 ; 35 ; 15 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- odor -- -----Odor (TON) ;; 1 1 .; 1 i '------------------------------------t'----------'----------'---------- Hardness -----Hardness (as CaCO(3)) ,, 541 ; 361 ; 252 {-----------------=-------------------;;----------;----------;----------; Chloride ;; 14 <1 11 I ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------', Iron 0.13 ; 0.36 ; <0.05 -------------------=----------------;;----------;----------;----------; Manganese ;; 1.5 ; 3.2 ; 0.33 ----------------------------------------------- ---------- eH (mv) ;; 531 ; 553 ; 526 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;-----------; Turbidity (NTU) ;; 31 ; 188 i 68 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- ; ; pH (Std.) ;; 7.0 ; 7.5 6.7 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------;. ; Magnesium ;; 41 ; 41 ; 17 ; ----------------------------------------------------------------------; 1 FILTERED: ----------------------------------------------------------------------; Aluminum ;; 0.1 ; 40.1 ; 40.1 ; ------------------------------------;;---------- ---------- ;----------; Sodium i 21 20 6 -------.----------------------------- ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------i Calcium ;; 139 ; 76 ; 62 1 -------------------------------------- { ;---------- ---------- ---------- Iran ;; 0.06 ; 0.26 ; 40.05 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Manganese ;; 0.41 ; 3.0 ; 0.31 { ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. CAWO LOG NO.: 91-09-1458 tz t --- H SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i i PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS H ------------------------------- (01) i (02) i (03) j; PMV-3 ; PMN -4 ; PMW-5 UNFILTERED: --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Antimony ;; (0.06 ; (0.06 1, <0.06 ------------------------------------ ---------- ;---------- ;----------; Arsenic ;; (0.005 ; <0•:005 ; (0.005 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Beryllium ii <0.005 (0:005 <0.005 i -------------------------------------H ---------- ;----------:----------; Cadmium ;; (0.01 _ <0.01 i (0.01 i ------------------------------------ H ---------- ;---------- ;----------; Chromium ;'; 0.01 ; 0.01 € <0.01 ------------------------------------;;----------;---------- _---------- Copper H 0.01 = 0.01 ; (0.01 ---------------------------- -------- ;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Lead ;; (0.005 (0.005 ; (0.005 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Mercury ;; (0.0002 ; (0.0002 ; (0.0002 ; -=----=----------------------------- ---------- ,---------- ;----------, Nickel <0.05 (0.05 i <0.05 It I------------ ------------------------ ;---------- {---------- ;---------- ; Selenium ;; (0.002 ; <0.002 ; (0.002 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; Silver ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; (0.01 : ------------------------------------ 1;---------- ;---------- ;----------� Thallium ;; (0.01 i (0.01 (0.01 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ---------- zinc H <0.01 ; <0.01 ; ,<0.01 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ,---------- ;---------- � NOTE: All results expressed in mq/L unless otherwise noted. CAVO LOG NO.: 91-09-4458 ----_----_--- ------------------1 ..----- !!SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS i;---------------------------------; i; (01) i (02) i (03) Kilt -3 ; PHV-4 PMu-5 -FILTERED: ------------------------------------------.----------.----------------; Antimony ;; (0.06 ; <0.06 ; <0 06 '------------------------------------ ; ;---------- ;---------- ;----------- _ Arsenic ;; (0.005 ; <0.005 ; (0.005 -------------------------------------;;----------;----------;---------- Beryllium _; <0.005 ; <0.005 ; <0.005 ; ------------------------------------;;---------- ----------;--------- Cadmium ;..d (0.01 ; <0.01 ; (0.01 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- ; Chromium ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; (0.01 ; --------------------------------------; ;---------,-;----------;----------; Copper ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; _-;------------------------------------;j----------;---------- ----------; = Lead ;; <0.005 ; (0.005 ; (0.005 ------------------------------------; ---------- ;---------- ;----------; ; Mercury ;; (0.0002 ; <0.0002 ; (0.0002 ; ------------------------------------ ;---------- ;---------- ;---------- ; Nickel ;; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; (0.05 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;--------- Selenium ;; <0.002 ; <0.002 1,(0.002 ------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- i ---------- Silver ;; 0.01 ; 0.01 ; <0.01 ------------------------------------;;----------;----------i---------- Thallium ---- ----Thallium ;; <0.01 ; <0.01 ; (0.01 ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;---------- ; Zinc ;; <0.01 ; <0.01 0.01 ; ------------------------------------ ;;---------- ;---------- ;----------; NOTE: All results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise noted. aboratory Name: CAMO lieat Name: Paggi and rroject/Facility Name: Sample Location: atrix: Water PESTICIDES Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: Martin Date Collected: Castle Point Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Date Reported: ---------------------------------------- r =SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION i r PARAMETERS ; -----------------------------' (01) ; (02) ; (03) € r = i PMW-3 PMW-4 i PMW-5 ; I - Endosulfan ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; II - Endosulfan ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; Endosulfan Sulfate <0.10 ; <0.10 ; (0.10 ; i a - BHC ; <0.05 ; <0..05 ; <0.05 e b - BHC ; <0.05 ; <0.05 = <0.05 ; d - BHC ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; g - BHC ; <0.05 ; <0.05 <0.05 ; Aldrin ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; ; : 13 ; ; Dieldrin ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; -4,4'-DDE ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; 4,4' -DDD <0.10 ; <0.10 <0.10 ; ; 4,4' -DDT ; <0.10 ; 0.10 ; <0.10 ; ; ; ; ; ; Endrin 1 <0.10 ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; ; ; ; ; Endrin Aldehyde ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; <0.10 ; Heptachlor { <0.05 ; <0.05 1 <0.05 ; ; Heptachlor Epoxide ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; <0.05 ; Chlordane ; <0.50 < <0.50 ; <0.50 ; ; Toxaphene ; <1.0 ; <1.0 ; <1.0 ; 1 ; ---------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. 4458 9-5-91 9-5-91 9-8-91 9-17-91 10-7-91. PCB's aboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: tient Name: Paggie and Martin Date Collected: Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Date Received: sample Location: Date Analyzed: atrix: Water Date Reported: -ethod: PGB ------------------------_ , , PARAMETERS ; SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ------------------------------- , (01) ; (02) (03) 1 PMW-3 ; PMW-4 ; PMW-5 1 Aroclor 1016 ; <0.50 = <0.50 ; <0.50 Aroclor 1221 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 ; i 1 1 i t r , , Aroclor 1232 ; <0.50 ; <0.50 <0.50 ; , Aroclor 1242 <0.50 < <0.50 ; <0.50 ; 1 Aroclor 1248 ; <0.50 1 <0.50 ; <0.50 ; 1 Aroclor 1254 ; <0.50 1 <0.50 ; <0.50 1 i i i i i 1 Aroclor 1260 <0.50 1 <0.50 <0.5 1 --------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 , NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. 4458 9-5-91 9-6-91 9-17-91 10-7-91 .. '--�-'-_--' ' -`° ' ' . �- � - ' � � � \ / � _�--� �_� / � / / 0 | _�_ - �-� ' ' `�,=`����'L-� � - _- L�- �'�r~�� - --� v - � � '_____ -' ''-- ' - _� _'- � ' � - � � ' ' \ \ | \ \ | �._~,� / ' ---_____'^_ .'_.-_-_- '-.� � '-_/�_'--.__-_-� __-__-_� -- �' _---_-_-'-_-''-' -------'---- --------------- ��'����_������� �' �_�������� __ � ���� ���_ ����_���� U___._____~~___� ___ �_ ___ _._____�_______ __________________ _�.�_-_-.- --__�' � '___-____-__-_-___-________-___---�.___-_--__----_-_'-__-____'_--_-_-__�-_---_'____-__- .. �� '� ______'_--_- �-_'____-_--_--'_____--_-'._-_�_'__-__-__-�__-____'-'_`---'__._._'�-_--___- | '! ! �! � � _______ | -�-'------ �-�-' ' '-' -� ' '� - -'--� --'- � �----- ----'------------'- ------'-'- ' U --'-- -- �f -- --- �' � -'-- � '~ ] | _ � . � _ - ' � / - �' - |' !� --''� �'-'-- - '- '--- __ � ' -� ' _ --- � ' - --'- �' -'- ' - � ' ' - �- '- �' '-- � '- SE>!IiOBITIIi 9?GFFIts lSll7s]S fill! SEEET :lSEI3BOTElbr'!{ID "s:.TY!{T�.BbE {C•SPOQSDS bebaratory Nue; ale libaritaries. lit. Salple 1D: Setbod "slink {hent Im, ;113i :ad Yartin. Date {allectad• PtejEctrfac?]it7 'aEe: {ast]e :oiat ?atE ?eceived: Salple '•^[ati4^_: P�:-i DatE ErtIattad; Yat±ix: ratEr Dice cT�tlted: YEttad: -sil �i: D:t: zeparted: 10-1-31 Detection Salple Detection Salple Blit Cm. 1?lit Cont. COMM NIO (qA) Q CO POVID NA) (1118) 4 ----------------------------------------------------------- I bis(2-Ciloreetbyl) etter ; 10.0 I ! Q; i 4-Brelo bei 1-pben ltther p s T 1 10.0 I Q I 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ; 10.0 ; Q ; I PDeaantirm 10.0 11,4-gicblorobeazene I' 14.0 I ; 0 : Intbracene ; 15.0 ; Benzidine 40.0 Q ; Di-n-botylpbtbeiate i 10.0 ) Q E l,2-Dictlorabenzene 10.0 ; ; Q ; ; Elooraattene i 10.0 1 ; Q •. 1 1,Z-Dipteapltydrazise 10.0 ; Q ; Pyrene 10.5 ; III ) i bis(2-Chloroisoaroppl) ether ; 10.0 1 : Q; i Bntylteazplphtbalite 10.0 I i Q It lT-Sitrasodilettylaliae 1 10.0 ! ) Q ; LY-Dichlorotenridiae I )<`1t1tr050-di`n-pi0pylailae ) 10.0 ( ; Q ; i BEazO(a)aaihIaceOe ; 10.0 ; ; Q i I Sembloroetbaae ; 10.0 ( ; Q 1 I Cbrysene I bitrobeazene ; 10.0 ; ( Q ; 1 bis(Z-Etbylteayl) gtthalate ) 10.5 ) 26 1 ) Isophoraue ; 10.0 ; Q ; Di-n-actylphtbalate { 10.0 i bis(-{Dl0I0ett0Ey) aEttaOe i 10.0 1 i Q t Beazo(b)i]aolaatteae ; 10.D ; Q I ' 4 1.2,4-Trieblorobeaz.ae ' 10.D ' ' Q ; ; Beata(k)ilaoraatlege { Saphthilene I 10.0 ; ; Q ; Beazo(Opyreme ; 10.0 5eaactlorobut2die:e ; 10.0 ( ; Q ; i Iadeao(1,2,3-cd)pyreae I 10.0 EeIactlorocyclopeatadiene ; 10.0 •. Q I Oitea[Ia,tlaattrtE4E ; 10.0 III 1 XOoraaaptthileae ; 10.0 I ; Q ; Beazo(g,t.i)perylese 1 10.D : II ' Dilethyl;itt3ist? ; 10.) ; ; Q ; ; PDEa71 ; 10.3 +yl 0.0 Q s [itro.tEaoi ' 2.6 -DI BitIOtolaa_e ': 10.0 '; : 7 ; ; 4-Fltr:phe^_Ol ': '-M E91aib10rabE9iE:t I 10.D ; I Q ; E 2.4-DiaitraptE.ol ) 3D.0 (II laceaapttteae I ]0.0 It Q ; ; 4,6-Diaitsc-rcresol 'sD.O ; Q ]•4`D1aitl0tollE_e I ]0.4 ; ; Q i ; Peatichloroptenoi Diettplpbtb:laie 1 ID.D ; ; Q 1 i p-{hla[o-l-tres0l ; 10.0 i ; Q; ; 4-Ctlorapte^pl-pteayletter 1 ]0.3 ( ; Q ; ; 2-ttletopbeno3 ; ]O,D ) ; Q ; Morese ; 10.0 ; II ; 2.4-DicticsopbEaal ; ]0,0 ' ' Q I ><-gitrosodiptearl;liie tIi ; 10.0 :. ; Q ; ; Z.4.6-?tictloropceaol 10.0 •. � Q ----- `---------- I Z.4-)itEttpl�tEia1 1D 0 ; Q ; CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES "Imam FIELD DATA SHEET /0"2 F SAMPLE DESCRIPTION LOCATION: CA7-5'TLe PT 3! - 12', 'IT WELL ID: [-1',,'l ,Aj "' r' MATRIX: GW SW Soil Other JOS #: NOTES: P�.slS�3I7� l uf�TA� PURGE DATA PERSONNEL: Tlx: i START DATE: r ` ' 3 = STOP DATE: ` ? Z-- STARTTIME: / -fir STOPTIME: : `f I DEPTH TO BOTTOM: MEASURING POINT: ACTUAL VOLUME CALCULATED VOLUME I :7 PURGE RATE m : �•�c. I�&1 a,�=� (gP ) A =water column (bottom depth -water column) ELAPSED TIME (min): / % B = gal/ft PURGE VOLUME (gal): " ` 1' A x B x 3 = Gallons to Purge 1.5"m 0.092 Gallons 2" = 0.163 EQUIP. ID: PERSONNEL: DP ��. gal/ft 4"= 0.653 Clear V' Slightly Turbid Turbid Odor No Odor 6" = 1.469 NOTES: X), iv a ?:?; 1f = ,• C ft fir'<;< _! 8"=2.611 q+ '•RFs ELEVATION DEPTH TO BOTTOM: % . MEASURING POINT: 7-0 G. DATE TIME DEPTH /ELEVATION ELEVATION TYPE NOTES '2-3i -q-L /0"2 F Purge Start (S) Purge Stop (D) 3! - 12', 'IT Sample Start (D) 3-3 r -9z. 15-2 t-1 Sample Stop (D) EQUIPMENT ID: P�.slS�3I7� l uf�TA� PERSONNEL: Tlx: NOTES: I SAMPLE WELL ##: P/",l w - -) FIELD DATE: FIELD TIME: 3 Ll SAMPLE: (W.11 #,YY,MM,DDj SAMPLE DEPTH: U M L Comp MEASURING POINT: METHOD: N(P, S BL 0 other EQUIP. ID: N=Nltrogen P=Perlstaltl- S=Submusible BL -Bladder B -Bailer FIELD RESULTS PARAMETER Depth (ft) PERSONNEL: NOTES: pH Cond. Temp. WEATHER: s -'t LAB REQUESTS LAB TITLE ANALYSES/METHOD # Tests TAT Request Last Date Date 4/89 klk C17 FV /I A/ f CI21 Toc k( H,4 A? 0. e r" 5-17, /t- I.) t TRANSPORTED VIA: 6i/Qc: 797 DATE: 6Z/ PP vow gooeate Flew 810PA Z� WELL CONDITION & NOTEP 4/89 klk �_. 3 � L O WC }Y Y O� • 6 M Pn C - q uL G I fir/ U w C� r- a O :n pV P4 QY Y S A O D U � r.r .. Y a P4 J 1 O 1+ e C Y uY H 4 V H O ® J Y a•r m p H WC }Y Y O� • 6 M Pn C - I fir/ w 40 L :n QY Y S ;L WC }Y Y O� • 6 M Pn C - w L O r.r .. Y a L iY .• M.- 1+ e C Y uY �C 4 V H a M WN Y Y - M eMc s u► pq u NE N y a..... ... s#: ��ii;•a;CF :ii?::. . fid^�?';kj''O2 •::}:'}<f3:`:: Mg .11M®R., i r i'Q- An}O ��{Yqff�f•�i*fi. x;• hoc"?v`•#�:'.,3,�::zi:: N ;A J2ai: G, WC }Y Y O� • 6 M Pn C - w L O r.r .. Y a L iY .• M.- 1+ e C Y uY �C 4 V H a M WN Y Y - M eMc s u► pq u CAMO LABORATORIES, INC 367 VIOLET AVENUE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 V21 (914) 473-9200 FED. I.D. #14-1725654 NYS LAB ID NO.: 10310 Mr. Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin 54-56 Main St. Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Date of Invoice: 4/24/92 P.O. #: Typed by: kag Invoice #: 92-04--1791 Project ID: Castle Point Landfill Analytical Report Date Samples Collected: 3/31/92 Date Samples Received: 4/01/92 Samples Collected By: Chazen Env. Ser. Samples Delivered By: Chazen Env. Ser. Matrix: Groundwater Parameters NYSD£C Baseline Water Quality Scan Analysis Comments: Comments: Unit/ Measure * See attached tables. Sample Identification (01) PMW-7 (01) LOGO All samples will be discarded after twenty-one (21) days or EPA Holding time, whichever is shorter, unless we are notified otherwise. Hazardous waste samples Will be returned to client_ Analytical Methods: All analytical methods comply with those specified in APHA "Standard Methods" and/or EPA approved methods. Laboratory Director John F. Eisenhardt cc: Mr. Tim Welling Chazen Environmental Services P.O. Box 3470 Manchester Rd. Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 r v 2 \ 00 03 \ N N CL o W N J Q a IL Q D \ a rn a o J r J r � z In o• W \ O N d N O W w S P J r d O r N d E U W Y P U Ln CP E U CL O F, N X: a a 0 o. N co0 J O w LL, r W J W : o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 O p 0 0 9 O O O O CO O O O 0 0 0 • 0 C:) Q • • • 0 • • Q • Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fd Ca 2 Ca Ca 2 cd 2 ca Ca Ca 2 2 Ca Cd Ca Ca (a (a cd (a ca ca ca 2 ca ca fa CB Ca ca D 0 0 a a a 0 0 0 a 0 C 0 O g 4 0 M 0 0 0 Ci Ci o a C] O o O O 0 z z z z z z= z= z= z z x z z z z z z== z= z= z z= z z O O O O O O O Cl o O O O O M O co O O O p O O O Om O O O O O O N N N N N N LM O O O N N N O N N O N O N N N N N N N O N N N Ca ca ca Ca ca to ca Ca 2 la ca ca ca 2 ca 0 Ca ca Ca ca ca ca ca 2 ca ca ca ca ca 2 2 x z 2 m m 0 0 0 0 0 2 z x = = 0 p p 0 C. 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O q O 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ln N UN N N N N N N Ca ca ca ca Ga w Ca w Ca 0 0 0 ca fa ca ca ca ca 2 a 0 0 ca 0 ca ca ca 2 ca la ca i zZ3 M = z== z= z z= i z Y z== z z z=== z 0 dM Inz= z z i z z 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0(�' o 0 0 0 0 CD o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 In ui Ir% In to in u% o 0 o In In in O ui Ln O Ln o vi u; In u; In In In u; 0 ui In In 2 2 ca ca ca ca CO Ca Ca Ca CO ca ca Ca Cd to fa ca 0 Cd 2 ca ca ca ca cd ca 2 ca ca ca In o a 0 0 Ca a a o 0 o a n 0 0 0 a a 0 0 o a a 0 0 a 0 a o 0 0 z=_= z =.= z== z z=_= z x z= z z z= z z== z== z 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 11 .1 . I I I I I ; ; I1 11 ; I 1 I I 1 1 1 -, — -, - p-, -, -- -, — — p1, 1, 1. 1, " p " " 1 — — — — — I- — 1, — — 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 7 7 7 7 3 3 3 7 3 3 7 3 am 3 3 3 3 7 j 7 7 ICO t C dO) N Ol d CO L O � 0 NOCN IO O L • G CW t- o WN l OI O) OO Li CL UO) dEpC L4+ WO•OOLLL U U L ... O O O 'O T .t U L a+ c CIp oL w LM Cv OL i+ S L L i L 0 O a IW s+ L t OINC L r OL tU C D G N M N U L Y i+ N O CCy L L r 1 •O N r U !i C w C O O J D V C J U M I N N O Q C O O L L L L W d t L tll H ap Q O L L L T LD U U T 1 C C I I I L O ? I-�C is L U U t a+ •^ i N W O7 g {y ro u U U O L L L W L L L LU r ——— r — — N d d OO ca OO m U L1 V U V C Q Q W I- 1- 1- r '! U ++ 4+ Y 4 0. LU U Z CO) W W U O w r (W z O J � a r s O w Z 'E 11 ce i Z W W N s U M w N t- P J d \ J [- M LL O 3 \ C3 ~ a o a rn J 1- z h O �+ W \ O N W f G J 1-- a o r rn rn -. a x U W 2 a [1 \ N fO• d O O E o 11 11 II 1 � 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0C 0 ca ca ca ca ca ca ca w ca ca ca ca 0 0 0 ca m 0 0 ca m 0 A ca Z; ca ca as Q ca ca M 2 2 Z 2 Z z 2 x m i x 2 2 2 2 Z i i m Z 2 i 2 2 i Y 0 0 Z 2 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O 2 fa �d fd Cd 2 2 Cd Ca @ @ fa 0 0 Ca Ca Ca B @ @ fa fa ca fa @ B @ @ Cd C3 a o c 0 n p p n o p 0 n n n p n n p Q o c p n n 0 o n o 0 n n Y x z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x z z x z z z z z z z z O O O O_ O O O_ O O O_ O_ O O O_ O_ O O O_ O_ O O_ O _O O_ O O O O O_ O O Ca @ l3 Cd is 2 f2 Ca @ ca @ @ 2 2 ca 0 Q 2 @ @ 2 Ca ria 2 fa B @ Ca Cd 2 [a 2 Y x z 2 z x 2 7 n 2 Z 2 z x 2 2 X 2 2 2 2 2 2 z in Z z x z z O O O_ P O_ n p p n p p n n p p n n p n ca n p p 0 n n n n o p n n p o n p z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x z z z z z z x z z x z z z 0 0 0_ o_ o_ o O_ o_ o o_ o_ o_ o_ o_ o_ o_ a_ o_ o_ _oo_ o_ o o_ o_ o_ P_ o_ o_ o_ o fa fa (d fa 0 @ Ca @ @ 2 2 2 0 f8 @ B @ @ f3 Ca 2 f3 @ fa fa (B cd Ca Ca Ca z x z z x i i z z a z z i z 7 z z z i z z i z z i z z i z z z L L L d O L C O C p1 C/ L/ LI O C C j N d C L L X �- 9 4/ N C C •C 1` V O41 0 O C Cyy C O td Qt C�� +0 O. � y � y .O O CC 'O4 y T N C 01' 3 L LC Co 5. IL Cu O J 0 O L L L A „r �OO _ N •1. L L L '�- L C! O O U O O ,tY 1+ 0 p F U U U r U_ E C C C_ p 0= O O L Q v W y Y U U u N v 8 N N M d v s s s s U U Z M m :: u z d a Y C C C C C C N .41 w 1 u u c d d w al al m N N N N N N N N N N M J J It �t 4 4 4 m 1p m m m m LL m m d W . 3 z UA w N a a 01 LL Q = \ 4 N � r J Z LU P w \ > Z J h d O h (? 4 f � s a a a P In M O X: P a o P In O co P J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C:, a O O O C3, O O_ O O O O O fa 2 n 2 fa @ n @ @ f3 ca ca @ @ @ f2 Cd ca n i M 2 n @ 2 2 @ @ z i z z i z i z z z i i z i z z z i 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 I.a 0 m 0 0 0 Ca 0@ Ca @ 0 0 2 to m@@ 2 to 0 ca ca 2 2 2 Z co Q 2 Z Z Z 2 2 X z 2 2 Z 2 X 2 2 Z Z z z Z Z 2 2 O 0 0 m C—:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fd !n a Cd Cd td Cd 2 2 Cd [a ca Cd /a fE 2 2 Ca Ca Ca a ca ca Cd fa i z o z z z i i x s i z i z z i Y z z i i i i i z O O O O O O O O O O O_ O O O_ O O O_ O O O O O Q O O O O_ @ @ @ @ 2 ca @ ca @ [a ca ca ca ca @ @ m 0 0 0 @ m @ 2 0 ca z z ti z z z x z z z z z z z x z z z z z z z z z z z z n II O O O_ O O O_ Co._ O O_ O_ O OO_ O_ O _ _ O O O OOO O _ _ O O_ O_ II Ca Ca Ca Ca (a Ca [a (a (a fa (a Ca fa @ @ fa @ @m to la @ Ca fa fa 10 m11 2 Z N Z Z Z Z Z 2 Q1' Z Z In M 2 Z 7L 7 Z z 2 Z Y z Z Z Cl 0 2 Z I! 7 I! C II 11 C _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r ~ 11 O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a II rU'M1 3 3 7 7 7 I 7 j 5 I 3 m I 7 7 7 7 .9 7 7 7 7 7 7 E I 7 It 11 u a p x II w n v CD H11 m it di d Gd E C G It YW 41 d W d W �. •E •� ii W L d d Q, dN CGI W W II LY ^ L L M W W �O O C u d t c C pT d L Y Y C r+ N N 'II d C^ L LLL. N RC1 Y7 T N E -Op. d W II to C pp11 T T �• W a41 ,_ (CD O O IV G O O GCI N D L 11 10 C M Y u O T C C O v L O O O W C .0 N 11 d d O N T !. C W d L L L s O o. L L 6 L u c d Il G •..+ Vl , C L L cc L i. u u U U Cd .1 Y Y Y 4+ OL Y C g W GL' l) T T N C C Y u pp O W W W W W 11 x Y L v 1 d W 3 K X X K O 2 Z Z Y C d d d L w'LL� S d d d d .yr W •w d L .0 L T � m U G O O 4 0 D D x x x= Z Z Z Z 4 n 4 n 6 ILI a i) w M P a G P C. co J d r 11 kY w I- ui J HK w 4 4 3 93 a Ln N IA ~O N I ry� O O O O I O F 1 f3 fd _ Cd to Cd h ca O N p o o O^ o M N 9 I • LA Z S • N • P Z N In S 'O O 1 b I r S Z S 1 1 ti Z O 1 I I O Ln cli Ln W% O O O O s• O, O O O N In O O O O M O IA O O 2 m m O f3 [d 0 N C2 2 M M 2 M [a fa •O p D p N p O I!1 O N p p ti p O O N N N Z S Z O 10 S •- Z z N Z 2 Ln N _ N O O O O O pti N N O O_ .O 1O O O d m Q O Q N ,O. 1� ca ca cia p O p kA 0 •O N I~' O N d p p ca ca caD tMn 0 0 0 0 x 0 Z O \ Z Z S M Z M O O '! M M S 2 r S Z In N N M 1 O ti p O O O O • O O N I!1 O O �O In O O O O N P O fd la P P f8 f2 Cd O .t to O O M 0 M O P O x z 0 M z '•�" 2 ti 2 O O �t O •- O Z x Z In N N M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 p 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 • 1 I I • • I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 2 . • 1 1 1 I 1 1 x ca N W C � Y N �d U _ v •Oth ce v o c gw•� C Y o d d O K Z V 1) gpY d y L V U O M O V T K �_• o G M I x Y v W v H O L C Y ) O '6 C E g v /� Fes• E d d CI Z Mp x Y W_ W y 7 u I d 7 y G a v W '� � � C i r r r B O Y O do co D •J •� •F� `O O O C 'O C C C OI OO L k- L '�p Y 4+ Y L y^J g L L W O O O) C C +' N O d d p I J € O w a L t t O �- O -p g d M m L) U u U u U U x -�+ «�+ S x Y SI La 3 O a 0. IY V� V�1 N h~~ d 1 z I°J (a S W N uU M U 3 \ a o a LA O i a a o P N x P d O O• LA d O P Ln 0 cc 11 _j o O U r Z \ LLJ LL 0 .aai 106 L! W 4 Q Ll O 3 0 Ll N t!1 LA LA L,% O LA •0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COd v o 0 o Q c Q o o in a a s z z z z z z z z x x z z z N Ln Ln Ln O N O o O O O O o o O o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca ca La ca ca ca ca 0 ca 0 0 0 ca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 z z z z z z z x x z z z x N •O O O r O Ln O LA O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ca O O ca ca o ca o o ca ca w B c ca ca z z in in 0 0 z i i i 0 i i N LI5 LPL N n C, OCD Ln N p O O O O O O O O O ca ca ca ca O O caca ca ca O w ca 2 2 2 2 Z z Z Z O Z 2 O O pZI� cr cr E E E' E El E E E E E' E 0 W w W r J LL W N N v U �► m '. N r� r g v V U v 7 v v Ol ...� M awl i 0 a f- U J `� 2 C L d L6 L O d N V W Z C 4 Q m U U U ..J $ .� N N r N K O .z. N sn N LA t!1 OV1 O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O Co O O O O O l3 lZ 2 t3 m Q Ca ca CH m 0 2 0 a a a 0 0 0 0 o p o o a 0 z z z x z z z z z z z z z N LAN LA O N 0 0 0 0 o a o o a o 0 0 0 0 o a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 ca (a ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca c8 ca 0 0 0 0 0 O a a a a 0 0 0 z x z x z z z x x z z z z N LA LALA O N O o O O O O O O O O ca ca ca ca O O ccaa ccaa ccaa ca O ca ca z i z z o 0 z i i i 0 z z N LA LFL Ln CD cli �DO O tl O LA O O O O O b O O O O O ca ca 0 ca O O 2 ca ca (aO 0 Ca 7 2 Z 7 O O �. Z 2 2 O 2 2 0 w a W r J LL 2 W N O 0 W O i+ Y Y O O_ Y m O O O_ Y 41 r i0+ u O c0 aQ+ O Y O Y W a Y 41 M Y Y 4.1,Y y •L "O ,� � � L V •d � •E6 C 4 Q Q lb U U U J 1 Z N N r N O L) x s LLI N h O. J Q \ z ~ u o c a a - J h � Z SA P LL1 \ a a kn o > \ F H d O (A C S U IL z p U wN a G O x P d O a Ln 0 m \ a a r o X i LU 1 t- I E I J H K I � o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0- ,n O- b o o b- In- in V1 In nU n�� O O O O O O O p p O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a Ca B m 0 0 m a 0 a a 0 2 M 0 Ca m 0 m N 0 m m 0 2 m [d Ca 0 a a O z z z z z z z 0 a aa 0 a a O a 0 0 0 0 0 a z z z z z x z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u1 v1 O v1 0 0 0 In In Vl In Li Ll! to O O O 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 o 2 Ca 2 2 [a Cd Ca C. 0 0 0 po o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Ca Cd [a Ca 2 Cd cod In 0 a a 0 a C 2 N e'a Cd is 2 Cd 2 fa Ca a a m a a a 0 a 0 0 a a 0 O O a O a Z Z• 2 Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z X Z Z Z 2 2 X Y Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 0Q b O O O O In In in O O O_ O 111 In In Ln LI! nU N n II _ 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Cl O O O O O 0 m 0 m 0 0 0 O O O O Op O O O O O qq O O • Op O O O M m [d 2 2 fa Cd N [d m 0 m a a a 0 z z z z z z z Cd fa fa 2 fa B 2 (a 2 0 A a 0 a a 0 O d A a 0 a a a 0 a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 In v1 O 111 L7 Cl0 0 to v1 ,n V% In 111 L^ v1 111 In In v1 v1 G p O O O O C 0 0 0 O O O O O O O • O O O O 0 O O O O Ca Cd Ca Ca Ca Ca Ca p O O O O O O O fa fa Ca B la Ca B Cd Ca Ca Ca fa Cafa Cd Cd fa ca a a 0 a D 0 C3 z z z z z z z A O a 0 a a 0 0 a 0 a a a 0O O a a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x z z O N N N N N N ►• m10 m m m m m y. u u u u u U U J A d d d d a d m U a N W W y- W •K �+ •+ H L W y C C O 41 C C vW- w w m C S U S s O C C C 'WO L 7 7 7 C C U U W m m. m T W •t W tL , W OO i+ J C� 1C d 0 x 4 1 U �7 r .t C U a W W W W W S h H a U Z CAMO LOG NO.: 92-04-3.791 NYSDEC BASELINE WATER QUALITY TZq ------------_--___--------------- ------- ------ SAMPLE ID PARAMETERS ;; (01) PMN -7 ; PH (Std.) 1158 t 1-----------------------------------11------- -.---_-- 1 eH(millivolts) 11 401 ' ------------------------------------;,---------------1 BOD <2 , I 1------------------------------------11-------- TDS ii 174 -__-' 1 Alkalinity (as CaCO (3)) ;; 16 ';------------------------------------ ;;---------------' i Color (Pt/Co) ;; 5 I , 1------------------------------------ 1;_----__--__--__1 Odor (TON 11 1 ! 1------------------------------------1f---------------' Turbidity (NTU) 11 0.27 ; ------------------------------------II----------I Sulfate ;; 70 ' I 1------------------------------------1;----- ----1 ' MBAS 0.20 _ ' I ------------------------------------ --------------- I Boron ei 0.4 ' I ------------------------------------- 1 1 ----------------1 1 Ammonia 1; <0.3 , I ------------------------------------11---------- 1 Nitrate 11 0.04----------------------------------------------------- 1 NOTE: All results expresseed in mg/L unless otherwise noted CAHO LOG NO.: 92-04-1791 NYSDEC BASELINE WATER QUALITY ----------------------------------------------------- 11 SAMPLE ID 1 PARAMETERS ;; (01) PMN -7 ' TKN ;; <0.2 ; ------------------------------------- ---------------' 1 Chloride 9 ; 1 Cyanide (0.02 ; ------------------------------------ --------------- 1 , 1 Total Phenol 11 <0.01 ------------------------------------;;------ TOC 2.3 ' 1 COD �< <5 ' ------------------------------------- E 1 Hexavalent Chromium 11 (0.05- ^� ---------------------------------- Hardness (as(CaCO(3)) ;; 77 ------------------------------------ --------------- 1 Calcium ;; 21 ' ' 6 Magnesium r, ; �- , i --------------- Iron <0.05 ; ------------------------------------ , , Manganese " 0.02 , 1------------------------------------ , Sodium 4 , ------------------------------------ 1 Aluminum - 0.1 , ------------------------------------------------------� NOTE: All results expresseed in mg/L unless otherwise noted �k° CAMO LOG NO.: 92-04-1791 PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS %-q -------------------------------------------------------- SAMPLE ID ; 'r NI' . PARAMETERS ; (01) { PMW-7 i i { ;Unfiltered; Filtered { r � , Antimony { <0.06 ; <0.06 { r r r r r Arsenic (0.005 ; <0.005 { r r r � , Beryllium ; <0.0d5 <0.005 r i , r r i Cadmium ; <0.005 ; <0.005 ; i { { Chromium { <0.01 ; <0.01 Copper ; <0.1 <0.1 Lead r r ; r <0.005 <0.005 , { Mercury ; <0.0002 , (0.0002 Nickel 1 ; <0.05 ; (0.05 { r r r r { Selenium ; (0.005 { <0.005 { Silver i <0.01 ; <0.01 { { Thallium { ; { <0.01 ; <0.01 i ; { { { Zinc i <0.1 { <0.1 { -------------------------------------------------- z ------ NOTE: All results expressed in mq/L unless noted otherwise. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Laboratory Name: CRMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 1791-01 Client Name: Paggi & I4artin Date Collected: 3/31/92 Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Landfill Date Received: 4/01/92 Sample Location: PMW-7 Date Analyzed: 4/03/92 Matrix: Water Method: EPA 624 Date Reported: 4/24/92 Detection Sample Limit Conc. COMPOUND (ug/L) (ug/L) ¢ Chloromethane ; ------------------------ 10.0 ; ; - U Bromomethane ; 10.0 i ; U Vinyl Chloride 10.0 U Chloroethane ; 10,0 i U Methylene Chloride ; 5.0 ; ; U Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 ; U Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene ;. 5.0 ; U 1,1-Dichloroethene ; 5.0 ; ; U 1,1-Dichloroethane ; 5.0 ; ; U Dichlorodifluoromethane ; 5.0 ; ; U Chloroform ; 5.0 ; ; U 1,2-Dichloroethane ; 5,0 ; U 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 10.0 U 1,3.,1 -Trichloroethane ; 5.0 ; ; U Carbon Tetrachloride ; 5.0 U Bromodichloromethane 5.0 ; U 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 ; ; U cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 ; U Trichloroethene ; 5,0 ; U Dibromochloromethane 5.0 ; U 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 5.0 U Benzene 5.0 ; U trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ; 5.0 ; ; U Bromoform ; 5.0 ; U Tetrachloroethene ; 5.0 ; ; U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane Q 5.0 U Toluene 5.0 U Chiorobenzene ; 5.0 ; U Ethylbenzene ; 5,0 U Acrolein ( 100,0 ; U Acrylonitrile 1 100.0 ; U SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHET 3ASE/MEUTRALIACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS Laboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Client Name: Paggi A Martin Project/Faciiity Name: Castle Point Landfill Sample Location: ?9-7 Matrix: later Method: EPA 625 Sample ID: Detection Sample Anthracene Date Limit Cone. 3131192 COMPOUND ('ug/L) NO) Q bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether ----------- 10.0 ; --- ! U 1,3-Dichlorobeazene ; 10.0 ! ; U 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ! 10,0 ! U I 3enzidine ; 4010 ! ; U 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ! 10.0 ! U 1,2-Diphenylhydr3zine ! 1D.0 { ! U biW-Chioroisaprapyl) ether 10.0 ! U N-Nitrosodimethylamine - 10.0 ; U N-NitIosa-di-a-prooylaaine ! 10.0 ! U Sexachloroethane ! 10.0 ! U Nitrobenzene 10.0 ! U Isophorone ! 10.0 ! ! U bis(2-Chloroetboxy) methane 110.0 ! U 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ! 10.0 ! U Naphthalene ; 10.0 ! ! U Bexachlorobutadiene ; 10,0 ! ; U Eexachlorocyclopentadiene ; 10.0 ; U 2-Chloronaphthalene ! 10.0 ; ) U Dimethylphthaiate ; 10.0 ! ! U I Acenapthtylene ! 10.0 U 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ! 10.D Seaachiorobenzene ! 10.0 Ancenaphthene 10.0 ! U 2,4-Dinitrotoiuene ! 10.0 ! U Diethylphthalate !0,0 ) U 4-Chlarophenyl-phenylether ! 10.0 ; U Fiuorene 10.0 N-NitrosodiohenyIamine (1) ! 1 10.0----------------------------------------------------------- I U Sample ID: 1791-01 Anthracene Date Collected: 3131192 a 2 Date Received: 4/01192 Butylbenzylohthalate Date Extracted: 4102192 Benzo(a)anthracene Data Analyzed: 4/21/92 bis(1-Stbylbex_vl) phthalate Date Reported: 4/24192 Benzo(blfluoranthene ! 10.0 Benzo(A)iluoranthene ! 10.0 RMA Detection Sample Licit Cone. CCMPOUND NOW lug/L) ------------------------------------------------------ 4-3ronopbenyl-phenylether ! 1D.0 Phenanthrene ! 10.0 Anthracene 10,0 Di-n-butylphthalate ! 10.0 Fluoranthene ! 10.0 Pyrene ! 10.0 Butylbenzylohthalate ! 10.0 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 20.0 Benzo(a)anthracene 10.0 Cbrysene ! 10.0 bis(1-Stbylbex_vl) phthalate ! 10.0 Di-n-octylphthalate ! 10.0 Benzo(blfluoranthene ! 10.0 Benzo(A)iluoranthene ! 10.0 Benzo(a)pyrene ! 1D.0 Inden0(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10.0 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ! 10.D Benzo(q,h,i)perylene ! 10.0 Phenol ! 10.0 2-Nitrophenoi ! 19,0 4-Nitropheaol ! 10.0 2,4-Dinitraphenol ! 50.0 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol ; 50.0 Pentachlorophenol 550.0 p -Chloro -a -cresol I 10.0 2 -Chlorophenol ) 10.0 2,4-Dichlorophenoi 1 10.0 2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol ; 10.0 2,4 -Dimethylphenol 1 10.0 NOTE: All results expressed in uq/L unless noted otherwise. 1791-01 3/31/92 4/01/92 4/02/92 4/24/982 PESTICIDES Laboratory Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: Client Name: Paggi & Martin Date Collected: Project/Facility Name: Castle Point Landfill Date Received: Sample Location: PMN -7 Date Extracted: Matrix: Water Date Reported _------------------------ SAMPLE ID PARAMETERS ;----___----_t k i (01) 1 ' I 1 1 I - Endosulfan ; (0.05 ; II - Endosulfan ; (0.10 E Endosulfan Sulfate i (0,10 , ; , 1 � a - BHC ; (0.05 1 b - BHC k ; <0.05 1 k ; 1 d - BHCi � <0.05 , 1 + g - BHC ; <0.05 k ; � ' Aldrin � ; <0.05 1 ; Dieldrin ! <0.10 I 4,4' -DDE 1 (0.10 4,4' -DDD ; <0.10 ; E 4,4' -DDT i <0.10 1 � 1 Endrin ; <0.10 ( Endrin Aldehyde ; <0.10 ; ' 3 Heptachlor ; <0.05 { ( Heptachlor Epoxide 1 <0.05 ; 1 � i Chlordane <0.5 ; i. Toxaphene ; <1.0 ; NOTE: All results expressed in uq/L unless noted otherwise. 1791-01 3/31/92 4/01/92 4/02/92 4/24/982 PCB borato.ry Name: CAMO Laboratories, Inc. Sample ID: 1791-01 .tient Name: Paggi. & Martin Date Collected: 3/31/92 ?roject/Facility Name: Castle Point Landfill Date Received: 4/01/92 aple Location: PMW-7 trix: Water Date Reported 4/24/92 --------------------------------------------------------- r PARAMETERS ; SAMPLE ID i (01) PMW-7 ; �r _____________;______--_-_____---___� Z Aroclor 1016 ; <0.50 i Aroclor 1221 C <0.50 r � Aroclor 1232 <0.50 � to; " i � � r 1 Aroclor 1242 ; <0.50 ; 1 Aroclor 1248 ; <0.50 r Aroclor 1254 ; <0.50 r � ; r Aroclor 1260 <0.50 r r r ' r NOTE: All results expressed in ug/L unless noted otherwise. IN' i Hydraulic Conductivity Protocol and Data si Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. PROTOCOL TO DETERMINE SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY SLUG TEST METHOD Saturated hydraulic conductivity of a porous medium will be determined by the following steps: 1) Introduce a slug of water (ie. one liter of distilled water) into a well bore and monitor the decline of head over time. This system is set up by first introducing an electronic water level indicator into the well to determine the depth to the water surface. 2) Determine the diameter of the well and record. 3) With the electronic water level recorder in the well, introduce the slug of water and record the initial rise in water level and the decline at intervals of approximately 30 seconds or greater depending on the reactivity of the well. 4) Record the water level measurements in a field data collection book. 5) Analyze these data using the Papdopulos, I.S., J.D. Bredehoeft, and H.H. Cooper, Jr. slug test method (On the Analysis of Slug Test Data, Water Resource Abstract, 9 (1973): 1087-89. Saturated Hydraulic Conduc8vity Slug fest Method Protocol Page 1 of l Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Date Well # Real Time Elapsed Time, sec. Water Level, It, 09/30/91 PMW-3 09:01:00 60 4.57 09/30/91 09:02:00 120 4.73 09/30/91 09:03:00 180 4.88 09/30/91 09:04:00 240 4.97 09/30/91 09:05:00 300 5.05 09/30/91 09:06:00 360 5.11 09/30/91 09:07:00 420 5.17 09/30/91 09:08:00 480 5.24 09/30/91 09:09:00 540 5.26 09/30/91 09:10:00 600 5.28 09/30/91 09:12:00 720 5.34 09/30/91 09:14:00 840 5.37 09/30/91 PMW-4 09:50:00 0 9.98 09/30/91 09:51:00 60 10.05 09/30/91 09:52:00 120 10.06 09/30/91 09:53:00 180 10.07 09/30/91 09:54:00 240 10.11 09/30/91 09:55:00 300 10.14 09/30/91 09:56:00 360 10.17 09/30/91 09:57:00 420 10.19 09/30/91 09:58:00 480 10.21 09/30/91 09:59:00 540 10.24 09/30/91 10:00:00 600 10.27 09/30/91 10:02:00 720 10.33 09/30/91 10:04:00 840 10.37 09/30/91 10:06:00 920 10.40 09/30/91 10:08:00 1040 10.44 09/30/91 10:10:00 1160 10.47 09/30/91 10:15:00 1460 10.55 09/30/91 10:20:00 1760 10.64 09/30/91 10:25:00 2060 10.69 09/30/91 10:30:00 2360 10.75 09/30/91 10:35:00 2660 10.79 09/30/91 10:40:00 2960 10.83 09/30/91 10:45:00 3260 10.85 09/30%91 10:50:00 3560 10.89 09/30/91 11:20:00 5360 10.98 09/30/91 11:50:00 1 7160 11.05 Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 1 Castle Point Landfill, Town of Wappinger Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Date Well # Real Time Elapsed Time, sec. Water Level, ft. 09/30/91 PMW-5 11:05:00 0 - Instant 15.20 09/30/91 11:06:00 0 - Instant 15.20 05/12/92 PMW-5 5 13.56 05/12/92 10 13.33 05/12/92 15 13.27 05/12/92 20 13.25 05/12/92 25 13.22 05/12/92 30 13.22 05/12/92 35 13.20 05/12/92 40 13.20 05/12/92 45 13.20 05/12/92 50 13.20 05/12/92 55 13.20 05/12/92 60 13.20 05/12/92 105 13.19 05/12/92 110 13.19 05/12/92 120 13.19 05/12/92 130 13.19 05/12/92 140 13.18 Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 2 PAGGI & MARTIN Consulting Engineers & Land Surue�yors 5456 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914--471-7898 December 1, 1992 Town of wappinger 2�O Middlebush Road BOX 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Constance C. Smiths Supervisor Reference: Castle Point Landfill Dear Board Members and Supervisor Smith: Please be advised that on this date, Tim Welling of Chazen Environmental Services, informed this office that the Town has received an extension of the deadline date for the submission of the Closure Plan for the Castle Point Landfill. The new deadline for said submission is January 31st, 1993. As per our most recent workshop meeting, this extension was requested so that we may investigate Possible sources of material to use in capping the landfill. To that end, this Office has distributed Solicitation Letters to several local Contractors. Letter of Intent from interested Contractors should be available within the next week, and will be forwarded for your review and comments. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, Peter J. Paggi for Paggi & Martin PJP:nar CC: A. Roberts, Esq, Town Attorney G. Foster, Town Highway Superintendent Joseph R. Paggi, Jr., P. j,_ Ernst Martin, jr., 1I.E., L.S. CHAZEN D-tchess Cotnrty offrcc; PO Box 3479, 22911 Pagc Park, Manchester Koad Poughkeepsie, NY 1260; Phone: (914) 454-3980 Fax: (914) 454-4026 Orange Comity Ojicc; Suite G, 201 Ward Street Montgomery, NY 12549 Phone: (914) 457-1521 Fax: (.914)4.57-152.3 Perry Metha New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561 ENVIRONMC� S �'��� RV1C , INC. F L October 14, 1992 RE,CEIVeD oc r 19 1992 NFATOWOwpOFFiCEpGER Re: Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Update Dear Perry: Based on Mr. Lawrence Gallagher's letter dated July 30th, 1992, the Town of Wa in er conducted a study to determine if the cover material present on the landfill meets t requirements stated in his letter of July 30th, Preliminary results of this investigation show is the that approximately 1.8 acres of the landfill site have material that is less than the two feet Of cover and also has permeability faster than 1 x 10.5 centimeters per second. The Town now is revealing options to bring the entire landfill area into compliance with these standards. We ask that the Town receives an extension of three months to review all their Options and produce and submit a final closure plan. Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this extension. Sincerely Timothy Welling, P.G. TGW:mga cc: Peter Paggi (Paggi & Martin) Constance B. Smith (T/Wappinger Supervisor) THE ry C.%�r:r» L9?�irnrr'ir?K t%" bold, Surrryu.� f.it. RC,: Chet' n (:imnn!'Irurilvori,rrrr, hx: COMPANIES L7,rrZ-0+1;11rirauurnr,rl.S'rr'rrmr, Isr, C;SIi'l7ar,r.S1'urrushr,, CASTLE POINT LANDFILL CLOSURE STUDY -' I PRELIMINARY REPORT OCTOBER 1992 Prepared By- Chazen Environmental Services Inc. Phone- (914)454-39go Fax: (914)454.4026 PO Box 3479, 229.8 Page Park Manchester Road Poughkeeps'ev New VGA 12603 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Dutc%rss County Office.- PO ffice.PO Box 3479, 229B Page Park, Manchester Road Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Phone: (914) 454-3980 Fac: (914) 454-4026 October 8, 1992 Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Re: Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Preliminary Report Dear Peter: In fulfillment of our proposal dated August 6, 1992, Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. (CES) has prepared the following preliminary report for your review. The three basic work tasks defining the scope of work for this project are as follows: 1) determine the thickness of the in-place cover material; 2) determine the permeability of the in-place cover material, and 3) report these data to you in a written format. TASK 1 Determination of Thickness of In-place Cover Material Ten soil cores were taken and described. The descriptions of these material plus the depth measurements of an additional 24 excavations are located in Appendix A of this report. This cover material basically consisted of light brown fine sand with some silt in trace of sub --rounded fine to coarse gravel with occasional cobble to stone size. coarse 'fragments. This material was very dense underlying the topsoil where present. During the coarse of this study, we found C&D Material, such as plastic bags, and metal fragments at various depths, as shown on are Figure 2 and photos 1 - 4. The depths showed. variability from the required 24" to shallowness of 4". CES reported these findings to you via a September telephone conversation. We discussed this issue and decided to further defined this area of insufficient shallow cover material. Our estimated area is shown on Figure 2. This area is staked in the field with the corresponding map numbers. The area of the landfill showing cover material less than the required 24" of thickness is approximately 1.5 acres in size. However, during CES's visual inspection of the total area following the Town's cutting of vegetation, a few pieces of C&D material were noted on the surface of the areas indicated to have 24" of cover. TASK 2 Permeability of In-place Cover Material Initially, ten locations were selected for in-place hydraulic conductivity testing. The very dense gravelly in-place cover material required CES staff to modify their test procedure. Soil samples were collected in.thefield at depths from 0" to 12" and 12" Tf-E Mq Chaim Enginrrring &Land Surveying ca., P.C. Cha% �e,n CON1P%'1q ChazrnEuvitonmrnlalSrrvirrf,lnr. EnviroPlanAnoriatrs, Inc. CSW Data Syurmr, Ine,, to 24". These materials were placed into cylinders and packed to mimic field conditions. The cylinders were then tested following the hydraulic conductivity protocol located in Appendix B. Based on the results of the initial ten samples, three additional field samples were collected and analyzed. The results of these permeability tests are shown in Appendix B and on Figure 3. The permeability requirements by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) are soils of 18" in thickness with a permeability of less than 1 x 10-5 em./sec. The initial test results found two areas of the site have permeabilities which are faster than the allowable rate. Three additional permeability samples were taken to try and further define and decrease the area required for recompaction or receiving additional cover. However, the soils in this area were found to contain more coarse sand and also failed the permeability test. These are samples labelled 11, 12 and 13. CONCLUSION These areas are defined on Figure 4 and incorporates an area approximately 1.8 acres in size. As a result of this investigation, the following information was determined. Two areas on the existing landfill cover do not meet either thickness requirements or permeability requirements. A total of approximately 1.5 acres of area needs an increase in cover material with a permeability meeting NYSDEC requirements. Please note that the area of thickness and permeability basically overlap each other. RECOMMENDATIONS • Bring on-site a sufficient quantity of material which can be compacted in approximate 6" lifts to permeability of less than 1 x 10-5..A total of 12" of this low permeability material is required. • Cover the areas defined by location P-11 through P-13 which have sufficient thickness of material, however, the permeability is too fast. Following our retest, we feel as though this area cannot be compacted to meet requirements due to the coarse nature of the material present. • Remove the incidental pieces of debris located on the surface of the cover material. • The Town may be able to save costs by bringing material onsite similar to that which is present for the cover material now, the source of which is unknown to us. This material, when compacted, has met the requirements of NYSDEC. • If, however, these materials are not available, a silty clay material would be required to be brought on-site and compacted and tested to meet these New York State requirements. Cover this low permeability material with 12" of soil material capable of supporting grass. The Town may be able to supply this material at a lesser cost. CES has estimated the cost to bring these materials in from a local source, Trap Rock Quarry, and spread this material and compact it in 6" lifts, followed by covering this low permeability material with the topsoil and finally, testing it. The estimate to perform these tasks is over $100,000. We have included a rough break -down for your review. We know that these costs are very high and that a possible substitution of material can be accomplished to reduce the cost significantly. have. Please review the information presented and contact me with any questions you may Sincerely, 6 imothy Welling, P.G. TGW:dI Director encl. COST ESTIMATE FOR CAPPING CASTLE POINT LANDFILL Estimated area to be capped: 78,408 ft2 Additional area to match grade: 5,000 ft2 Total area 83,408 ft2 Cay 83,408 fe x 1 ft /27 ft3/yd3 = 3,089 yd3 For = 3,000 yd3 compacted x 1.5 = 4,500 yd' clay 4,500 yd' @ $18/yd3 spreading 5 days @ 1000/day = $$5,000. compacting 4 days @ $1000/day = $5,000. Clay Total $4,000. $90,000: Top Soil 83,408 ft2 x 1 ft / 27ft3/yd3 = 3,089 yd For = 3,000 Yd' compacted x 1.5 = 4,500 yd' topsoil 4,500 Yd' @ $15/yd' = spread 1 day @ $1000/day = $67,500. rake seed mulch 2 days @ 12.00/day for crew= $1,000. Top Soil Total $2,400, $70,900. TOTAL ($90,000. clay + $70,900: top soil) 1 0.900. _..- S 1 I C 14 - Excavated hole Depth of cover: > 24.0 inches. C 18 - Excavated hole Depth of cover: 14.5 inches. Debris revealed at 14.5 in.: Metal pipe, plastic scraps and plastic cap. Chazen Environmental Services Inc. � f �.' �a l� Y t - '� a ` ► a. � �'-<. 3 ,w'` ,ice' r r. 4 * i -jF �y.yy�;ri. N��' �� �xt �. �i j-II�'�, j :`Jf. K ��, >•, ', . _ / ,t . y���i .3 . ry•Ai ♦ice -. ... ' T <. tl% .3 • R . ' y���•"•ice fir,/, �,• �a:`� •�e...�;• •�.' APPENDIX A Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations kxix 11.f 01 ONOMMM"kc;�MMU-, M, Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C1 08/26/92 0.0-4,o Light brown, fine sand, some silt, trace subrounded coarse grabundant *il'ne' r0`oi's" firm. 4.0-15.5 Light brown, fine sand, little silt, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 15.5-19.0 G & D material encountered. (plastic bag, decomposing leaves) 19.0-24.o Grey -brown, fine -coarse sand, little silt, trace fine -medium gravel, wood, moist, medium dense. 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C2 08/26/92 0,0-4.o Light brown, fine sand, Some Silt, trace fine gravel, abundant fine roots, dry, firm. 4.0-14.5 Light brown, fine sand, little silt, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 14.5 - 24.0 Crushed rock. 24.0 End of boring. _�O'iBoring ng� ID Date Depth of Soil . (inches) Identification 4 08/26/92 O,O - 4z -' Light brown, fine - medium sand, little silt trace fine -mediumabundant fine roots, dry, firm. 4.5 -21.5 Light brown, fine - medium sand, little silt, trace fine - medium gravel, dry, very dense. 21.5-24,o Brown, fine - medium sand, trace silt, dry, loose. 24.0 End of boring. Boring IE I Date - Depth of Soil - (inches) Identification' 4 08/26/92 0.0-24.o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C5 08/26/92 0.0-4.0 Light brown, silt, little fine - medium sand, common fine roots, dry, firm. 4.0-24.o Light brown, silt, little fine -medium sand, trace fine gravel, few crushed rock, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. Geologist- L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 1 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations ..... 9• T F .'VSi`tSY:' ,.w `^T'?N Y W ::;•W''n "� r{rJ:N/xY,: '.A:.w>:: .,.:: �::::.>,:.a<'c�n.>: .:M.e.�,.a.`::cw:<oh`aw...'rw.a'v`.":C"l'rJn"`'��:..k•.'JJ%c`�.J...,.:3..a..J..:,..:.J.w...:.J..^».'wc..>.'$:..J.:�w'J;"•5n..w«..w`�.:�vu:.�wr`.�2;�x.r:"u�:�9<wa;<.x xca'•:'��::.:c. n:•' :'a.o.o:�?w:xJ:x,,:,.>. C::�i`?.:.w:J: ".:.;kJ: :.,,$:::'did Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (Inches) Identification C6 oa/2$/s2 0.0-24.o Light brown, fine -medium sand, little silt, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification „C7 08/26/92 0.0 18.0:: ...... ".....,.. ...... ......... _.W........ Li ht brown, silt, lift g le fine sand, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 18.0 End of boring, split spoon refusal. Refer to excavation #33. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C8 OS/2s/s2 0.0-5-o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine gravel, common fine - medium roots, dry, firm. 5.0-14.5 Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 14.5-24.0 C & D material encountered. (Brown, fine sand, little silt, black ashes, wood, dry, medium dense.) 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification CIO s/s2 0.0-4.o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine - medium gravel, common fine roots, dry, firm. 4.D . 24,o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine -medium gravel, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification CIO 08/26/92 0,0-s.5 M _ _ Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace gravel, abundant fine - medium roots, dry, firm. 5.5-11.o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace gravel, dry, very dense. 11.0-24.o Light brown, silt, little fine - medium sand, trace fine gravel, crushed rock, small subrounded to rounded pebbles, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. Geologist: L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 2 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification ' &'� '��;2�/92 - 24.o Grey brown, fine sand, some silt, little angular to subrounded fine gravel, dry, firm. C14 09/16/92 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C12 09/24/92 0.0-24.o Grey brown, fine sand, some silt, little angular to subrounded fine gravel, dry, firm. C14 09/16/92 24.O End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C13 09/24/92 (inches) "Light brown', fine sand, little angular to subrounded fine - medium ravel, trace silt, dry, firm. C14 09/16/92 24.0 End of excavation. Boring Oats Depth of Soil Identification ID Date (inches) Identification C14 09/16/92 0.0-24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Oats Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C15 09/1s/s2 o.o-24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Geologist: L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 3 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations �111:.Ws,!.. ^ •;',;: bvy`.7:HY:vx.�a,:jrt;a u4"he # - r t K; .+ t�;,r:, ..alis"CA :1`�.;X..^t':: �:.aae:..:h:vxaCx •i:..:;.. t. w§ : h '6r, > k .w..a..c..a..,::.n:...:.a:A.>.: w.,..,,,,:�:�.Y:,.;'$s«;c.,.:,.'�.:.:..,,V....d`• �.a:::w.:>,.S�r£,:#�;'swy�:.:r .:xowwt•.ti:�e'�^#r •:s, .;;;x;;.carr.•.�.v ... .r ... .h Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification Cif as/1s/s2 0.0 - 24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. .:...,......,N.,.... ... M:. C19 09/16/92 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C17 09/16/92 0.0-24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. C19 09/16/92 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C18 09/16/92 0.0 -16.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. C19 09/16/92 14.5 C & D material encountered. (Metal pipe, plastic scraps and plastic cap.) 1s.o End of excavation. Boring Date Depth of Soil Identification 10 Date (inches) Identification C19 09/16/92 o.o -18.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 18.0 C & D material encountered. (Plastic bag and decomposing leaves.) 18.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C20 09/18/92 o.o 72Z Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Geologist: L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 4 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations c>s>.:�x: ..EA.,:"x'w' yc+.'w,re, •esYA:�.ms°x�r' r•u"t• t :w•M',•m�;..,•:.,,;::.,.t�.+,:' w ;re' ''ti w w N vmt _A�` ..•.,,3.,..»,:�,siv..::,.T..,.�du..,v.V:,..fis�x�..,..ww.. a...S.....,.�?.::,..,.:�:wwo:..;;;a;;;c:;o::...o.,w.;.�..�^ti-; ': .. ',f.�..,: ���.."ot..+`n"x\'`h`cap'w.`.�z:'r^::'S",^o`:;�';.,y.r.:.. ,4;'R."•a`�.o.•.,,•c..ti.:w:�' .,.a�..fi•: �� S•?'.5: ..�.i22 Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification "C21 09/18/92 N 0.0-5.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged, C25 09/18/92 5.0 C & D material encountered. (Scrap sheet metal) 5.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C22--0-9/18/`"" ....:...:.....�.. s2 , .M.,......,..v,.. 0.0 -24.o ...,...p:,,.�,.:...,..,.........,� ,.....y _,11_,11 :1111_. ,111,1,. , , :....,.,..,.,....,.w 1111 ,...:...h.,..M .....,.rt.... Excavation performed for cover de th onl No soil descriptions lagged. C25 09/18/92 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C23 09/18/92 0.0-15.o ......................................................................................................................... Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. C25 09/18/92 1510 C & D material encountered. (Wood and ceramic tile.) 15.0 End of excavation. Boring ID ~C24 Date Depth of Soil (inches)_ ; Identification ID .. ... 09/18/92 o.o -1o.o� _ ExcavatioW erformed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. C25 09/18/92 10.0 C & D material encountered. (Painted wooden board) 10.0 End of excavation. Boring Depth of Soil ID .. ... Date ........... (inches) Identification C25 09/18/92 ......... .1111., 0.0- 11.o ............ 1111.. ... .......... .. ... . .......................... .. ... ... ......................... ................. 1111 1111.. Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 11.0 C & D material encountered. (Wood and foam insulation.) 11.0 End of excavation. Geologist: L. Zeiler Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 5 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil at Selected Locations Boring Logs Boring� ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification 26 09/18/92 0.0 -24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C27 09/18/92 0.0-24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24,0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C28 09/18/92 0.0-22.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 22.0 C & D material encountered. (Styrofoam) 22.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) I Identification C29 09/21/92 0.0-20.o .... ...... Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 20.0 C & D material encountered. (Styrofoam, plastic and duct tape.) 20.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification 09/21/92 0.0-24.0 Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.o End of excavation. Geologist: L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 6 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations uix............ Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C32 09/21 /92 0.0-24.0 Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID [Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C32 as/2a/s2 0.0 - 12,o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil d e sc r i ptions logged. 6.0 C & D material encountered. (Metal canister scrap, electronic parts, wires and plastic.) 12.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C33 os/14/sz 0,0 - 20.5 Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 20.5 C & D material encountered. (Foam insulation and decomposed organic materials.) 20.5 End of excavation. Boring 10 Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —6 :-:.:.,:M :,..,-.-":..,-:.",..,--.- 09/14/92 ,-." 0.0-24,o '- — . . . . . Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 4.o C & D material encountered. (Metal scrap and plastic.) Excavation performed for cover depth only. 24.0 End of excavation. Geologist: L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations Cylinder Test cm./sec. Elapsed Time ID No. Date real a l y 1 09/03/92 12:24:00 0 10 1 09/04/92 15:10:00 96360 1 Pla 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 09/09/921 16:01:00 1 111060 Depth to WaterDepth of Waterl Hydraulic Conductivity cm. CM. cm./sec. 7 2.0 3.0 Start 3.4 V 1.6 1,45E-05 r7 I 2.0 3.0 Start 10 2.0 9,00E-06 Average: -1.18E 05 I Cylinder Test Date Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Depth f Water 0 =�n Conductivity Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm. sec. cm./sec. c P2a 1 09/16/92 ....... 08:03:00 0 2.0 0 3.0 Start 9,34E-06 P2b 109/17/92 07:53:00 85800 2.5 2.5 6.83E-06 P2a 2 09/18/92 09:26:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 3.60E-06 09/18/92 16:15:00 24540 2.2 2.8 8.15E-06 Average:[- 6.99E-0 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm, Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. Pia 1 09/16/92 12:24:00 0 2.0 .- 3,0 Start 09/04/92 15:10:00 96360 2.9 1 2.1 9,34E-06 P2b 2 09/08/92 09:11:00 0 2.0 3.01 Start 1 09/09/92 16:01:00 111000. 2.42.6 2.9 3.60E-06 Average: 6.47E-06 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water Cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. _ vu Pia 1 09/16/92 --rt 08:03:00 0: 2.0 3.0 Start i 09/17/92 07:54:00 85860 2.7 1 2.3 8.15E-06 P3a 2 09/18/92 09:35:00 01 2.0 3.0 Start 1 109/18/92, 16:16:00 , 24,060 2.1 2.9 T 4.16E-06 Average: F 6.15E-06 =upper b =lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page I of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations Test Elapsed Time .ny,.•:.7.'6:.H:nY v}:i?. '?. hyh'F.u..w� n;: Vvv,: S;::S'..,' r.',' ln•.:i..` v}Lie�2v+o `.'L+: s:vrntik% ::>:'3 v',' ' :'d5,t .'n`.�nv: rX'Ss.�tix ri ..vr.' wb :;C,a�.Yfn'9'm:.'%i�}�'vkv$�.�av'•r+`�"n4�v.�v3:>`.0 �''` 'R: X:'.DY.::9.ixto:4 �:�:ans}�.:p.'+�f;,'A`::.Y,f�.+.�v.. 4..+F.1t%9RSvb i}ld}�:��'u�x. n Cylinder Test Hydraulic Conductivity Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. ............ P3b 1 09/03/92 12:25:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:11:00 96360 2.5 2.5 5.19E-06 P3b 2 09/08/92 09:11:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 0 09/09/92 16:02:00 111060 2.4 2.6 3.60E-06 Average: 4.40E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P4a .... 1 09/03/92 12:25:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 09/04/92 1 15:11:00 96360 2.0 3.0 < 1.04E-07 P4a 2 09/08/92 09:12:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 16:02:00 111000 2.1 109/09/92116:02:00 16:17:00 111000 2.1 1 2.9 1 9.01E-07 Average: <5.02E-07 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P5a 1 40916/92 A08:03:00.. u. :,.o ..v..x,_.3:.0.,,.u.w... . A2.0 Start h...�....-, ,v::...... Start"....: 09/04/92 09/17/92 07:54:00 85860 2.1 2.9 1.16E-06 P4b 2 09/18/92 09:36:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 16:02:00 111000 2.1 09/18/92 16:17:00 24060 2.1 2,9 1 4.16E-06 Average: 2.66E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P5a 1 09/03/92 12:26:00 1 1;1-1110 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:11:00 96300 2.4 2.6 4.15E-06 P5a 2 09/08/92 09:12:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:02:00 111000 2.1 1 2.9 1 9.01 E-07 Average: 2.53E-06 a = upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 2 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations 'o;?;>::::ay yy. .•.x'. xov:: ..,. v: t:a:y..>::: •ywy..w,-'.}f.;:.,yk... J.,»>r:••��.•,'.''" :aaY.:..imir �ii`.`.Ii}rF.Ti>Y,'n'n:`iia`::x^vXtiiiA.ci#4s'76.:t'uhw'% n'r.r`;AQ'•M•.t`�..� Cylinder Test Date Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P5b 1 09/16/92 08:04:00 0 1.7 M. ........ 3.0 Start Start 3.12E-06 09/17/92 07:56:00 85920 1.7 3.0 <1.16E-07 P5b 2 09/18/92 09:38:00 0 1.7 3.0 Start 1.7 3.0 09/18/92 16:17:00 23940 1.7 3.0 <4.18E-07 Average: <2.67E-07 Cylinder Test Date Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. 76a 1 09/16/92 08:05:00 0 1.7 3.0 Start 3.12E-06 P6b 09/17/92 07:53:00 85680 n/a n/a n/a P6a 2 09/18/92 09:39:00 0 1.7 3.0 Start 9.00E-07 09/18/92 16:18:00 23940 1.7 1 3.0 1 <4.18E-07 Average: <4.18E-07 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. :.P6bJ h i. _ 09/03/92 12:27:00 x. cm. *:.w.31.a:.,...h ,..h., NM..Stan w 1. 09/03/92 09/04/92 15:12:00 96300 2.3 2.7 3.12E-06 P6b 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 2 09/08/92 09/09/92 16:01:00 111060 2.1 2.9 9.00E-07 Average: 2.01 E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. ,..T P7b . 1. 09/03/92 •2:27:00. .. 2.0 W .....3.0 .. .. ...,•Start 09/04/92 15:12:00 96300 3.5 1.5 1.56E-05 P7b 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:01:00 111060 2.6 1 2.4 5.40E-06 Average: 1.05E-05 a = upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 3 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations Cylinder Test Date Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P8a(I) 1 09/16/92 08:05:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 3.12E-05 P8a(II) 09/17/92 07:57:00 85920 5.0 0.0 3.49E-05 P8a(l) 2 09/18/92 09:39:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 1 2.70E-05 09/18/92 16:18:00 1 23940 3.1 1.9 1 4.59E-05 Average: 4.04E-05 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P8a(1i) 1 09/03/92 12:28:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:13:00 96300 5.0 0.0 3.12E-05 P8a(II) 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:01:00 111060 5.0 1 0.0 1 2.70E-05 Average: 2.91 E-05 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P9bN. 1 .09/03/92 12:30:00 0 ....:.....w..:.,.2•0�.::».,.. :,..,.....x,.3.0n.l.....N: nx,,.�,,.....:.._,.:....w.Start'....v 09/04/92 15:14:00 96240 4.4 0.6 2.49E-05 P9a 2 09/08/92 09:10.00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:01:00 111060 3.7 1 1.3 1.53E-05 Average:[- verage: 2.01 E-05 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P9bN. 1 09/16/92 08:06:00 0 „ . ,.,..w2.0 . v , 3.0 ....N. _.., . wStart . .. 09/17/92 07:58:00 85920 4.2 0.8 2.56E-05 P9b 2 09/18/92 09:40:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/18/92 16:18:00 23880 2.7 1 2.3 1 2.93E-05 Average:1 2.75E-05 a = upper b = lower Chazen EMironmental Services, Inc. - Page 4 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations VOW . n,�+:G�; "^' > v.C"�'. •'•'„w^o,,n".•:w.•4�::'s✓�fi.�c, z"r,.:.atCi'a'°..,u%ss::v�r"•''., r. '�+.�:;:^.H z:r u.o s,�"x'#.�iti.^•,� Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P10a 1 09/16/92 08:03:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start :.:..:....:..:......:::.,...::r:. Start.... 09/17/92 07:54:00 85860 5.0 0.0 3.49E-05 P10a 2 09/18/92 09:42:00 D 2.0 3.0 Start 2.0 3.0 09/18/92 16:19:00 1 23820 4.8 0.2 1.18E-04 Average: 7.62E-05 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity 1D No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. . ,......:..... ,. P11.a , 1: . 09/03/92 .::.:....::.::,.. 12:30:00 0 ....... :...,,,2.p..:..::::::.:.::..:.,.::.,.... 3.0 :.:..:....:..:......:::.,...::r:. Start.... 09/30/92 09/04/92 15:14:00 96240 5.0 0.0 3.12E-05 P i Ob 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 07:59:00 85680 3.9 09/09/92 16:01:00 111060 5.0 0.0 1 2.70E-05 Average: 2.91 E -O Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. ,StartuM.. P11.a , wv'.: h09/29/92 16:11:00 M.::::...D .,..v:.v. .. _,........1v.6 x.,..3.0, ..,... :,:...:...:::u.. _....,. 09/30/92 09/30/92 15:51:00 85200 1.8 2.8 2.35E-06 P 11 a. 2 10/01/92 115:40:00 0 1.6 3.0 Start 07:59:00 85680 3.9 10/02/92 07:55:00 58500 1.7 2.9 1.71 E-06 Average: 2.03E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P i 1 b 1 09/29/92 16:11:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/30/92 15:49:00 85080 4.0 1.0 2.35E-05 P11 b 2 10/01/92 MAIM 0 2.0 3.0 Start 10/02/92 07:59:00 85680 3.9 1.1 2.22E-05 Average.'[- verage: 2.28E-05 a = upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Tnc. -page 5 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations ,.,. .. .,}....,,., .. "'a�,`t'".cam""sa,�.ax••`''xhx�:fi4''`�"%�m•'s's�'P::>�> 44iS�::•.�"�'.'.;�:'$ ,v""�'' n��r�',;�.���C�1?���mu.�° i2.�E"�t.�s,�: Mc,`'"•,�">''�""'�;�:'�.x•�' .�•a,w�+�. Cylinder Test cm./sec. Elapsed Time ID No. Date real sec. Pita 1 09/29/92 16:12:00 0 1.7 2.3 09/30/92 15:51:00 85140 P12a 2 10/01/92 15:43:00 0 10/0'2/92107:57:00 1 58440 Depth to Waterl Depth of Waterl Hydraulic Conductivity cm. cm. cm./sec. 1.0 3.0 Start 2.2 1.8 1.41 E-05 1.0 3.0 Start 1.7 2.3 1.28E795 Average:[- verage: 1.35E-05 Cylinder Test Date Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec.cm. .. �0 cm. cm./sec. P12b:: .:7 0929/92 .16:12:00 ...::.,.n::..::..0. ...:....,..2.Ory .. ........ «..,. x3.0 ....A::.....,.,...,...._....:.,.start.,:.,.n 3.53E-06 P13a 09/30/92 08:04:00 57120 5.0 0.0 5.25E-05 P1 2b 2 09/30/92 15:47:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 5.14E-06 4.3 10/01/92 08a3:00 59160 5.0 0.0 5.07E-05 Average: 5.16E-05 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm. /sec. w.P13a .1 09/29/92 16 113.00 .. �0 w AµW 1.3µW 3.0 Start M1„ 09/29/92 09/30/92 15:50:00 85020 1.6 2.7 3.53E-06 P13a 2 10%1/92 15:44:000 5.26E-05 i.3 3.0 Start 08:12:00 0 1.3 10/02/92 07:57:00 58380 1.6 2.7 5.14E-06 Average: 4.33E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity lD No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P13b Y M1„ 09/29/92 16:13:00 N. WO - 1.3 3.0 Start 09/30/92 08:04:00 57060 4.3 0.0 5.26E-05 P13b 2 09/30/92 08:12:00 0 1.3 3.0 Start 10/01/92 08:13:00 86460 4.3 0.0 3.47E-05 Average: 4.36E-05 a =upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 6 of 6 Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING PROTOCOL 1) A sample location is selected, representative of the soils to be tested. 2) Vegetation and soil materials are carefully excavated to expose the undisturbed soil layer to be tested. 3) A thin walled metal cylinder, approximately 4 cm. in diameter and 15 cm long, is pushed into the soil to a depth of 10 cm. 4a) If the permeability testing is to take place in the field, bentonite is placed around the outside of the metal cylinder, at the interface of the soil surface, to form a water tight seal (see field setup diagram) 4b) If field testing is not desired, the sample cylinder is carefully excavated and brought back to the Chazen facilities for testing. The bottom of the cylinder is wrapped with filter material to prevent soil loss during the test. The wrapped cylinder is then placed on a gravel bed to allow water to exit through the filter material (see office setup diagram). 5) The cylinder containing the sample to be tested is filled with water and allowed to stabilize for a period of time sufficient to completely saturate the soil within the cylinder. Additional water is added as needed to replace the water adsorbed by the soil. 6) After soil saturation is achieved, the water level within the cylinder is adjusted so that the depth of water is about 3 cm. above the soil level. The date, time, and depth of water is then recorded. 7) An evaporation monitoring cylinder, similar in size and material to the sample cylinder, is set up in the vicinity of the sample being tested and filled to a level approximating the water level in the sample cylinder. This water level is recorded along with the sample information. S) Periodically, the sample cylinder and the evaporation cylinder are checked and the date, time, and water level in each cylinder is recorded. The Chazen Comuani_es Hydraulic Conductiuit Testing Protocol Page 1 OP 9) Permeability, "K", in cm/sec, is calculated, based on the change in water level over time, according to the following equation: K = ((Ho - Hl/t) - (( Ea - El)/t) Where. Ha = Depth of water in test cylinder (cm) at the start of the test period. H, = Depth of water in test cylinder (cm) at the end of the test period. Eo = Depth of water in evaporation cylinder (cm) at the start of the test period. Et = Depth of water in evaporation cylinder (cm) at the end of the test period. t = Time in seconds between the start and end of the test. FIELD SETUP OFFICE SETUP I r(ace se Cloth Gravel E0- -Ems_ Solid Bolcom 0o aooa a� OUoO°800 $v ogo�ogo�oc The Chazen Companies Hydraulic Conducltvily Testing Protocol Page 2 ( 2 MEMO MODIFIED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING PROTOCOL 10/07/92 Castle Point Landfill Closure Study The existing characteristics of the very dense, gravelly in-place cover material at the Castle Point Landfill resulted in performing a modified test procedure. The dense soils did not permit the insertion of test cylinders for field permeability testing and inhibited the standard method of acquiring materials for in office testing. The procedure for the collection of soils for permeability testing was modified in the following manner. • Vegetation and soil materials were carefully excavated to expose the undisturbed soil layer. • A hole was excavated to a depth of 24 inches. • Soils were excavated from the side walls of the hole and packed into the test cylinders in a manner which was most consistent and representative of the in-place materials. • The bottom of each cylinder was wrapped with filter material in the field to prevent soil loss during transport. The cylinders of soils to be tested were transported to the office and permeability testing was conducted according to the standard protocol for hydraulic conductivity testing. The Chazen Com2anies llyrfrnrrlic Conductivity '!'estirtb Protocok Modificatian PAGGI & MAR'r1N �*C Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914--471-78'8 August 10, 1992 Town of Wappinger 20 Middlebush Road Box 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Town Board Constance 0. Smith, Town supervisor Reference: Castle Point Landfill Dear Supervisor Smith: Enclosed please find a Copy of a proposal from Chazen Environmental Services to perform the required work to prepare and submit a Final Closure Plan, to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The total estimated cost for this work is $ 4,575.00, and can be completed within ten (10) working days of authorization. Also enclosed is a chart that compares the 1991 estimated costs with the actual costs to date. The original estimate to complete the Proposed Subsurface Investigation Plan (PSIP) and the Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) was $ 42,150.00. The actual cost to complete this work was $ 37,007.24. Therefore, if the Board were to authorize Chazen to perform the work outlined in the enclosed estimate, the total cost would be $ 41,582.24. It should be noted that the Town would then have accomplished the Final Closure of the landfill for less than the original estimate, for just the PSIP and SIR completion. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, Peter J. Pag'gil��' for Paggi & Martin PJP:nar Encl. Jwieph E Paggijr,, FE. Ernst Martin, Jr., 1_s. CASTLE POINT LANDFILL CLOSURE * COST TO DATE FOR PSIP AND SIR * PROPOSED ADDITIONAL COST FOR FINAL CLOSURE PLAN ORIGINAL COST ES13MALTE FOR 151P AND SIR o CRMO LABORATORIES SERVICE .............................$ 16,424.00 (INCLUDING DRILLING COSTS) O BEDROCK CORE SAMPLING ..................................$ 11,250.00 O CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL, SERVICES ..........................$ 12,083.00 o REVISED WELL DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES ....................$ 2,303.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (1991) ............................$ 42,150.00 AC AL COST TO COWLETE IP AND SIR 0 CAVO LABORATORIES ......................................$ 11,03,8.50 (INCLUDING DRILLING SERVICES) o CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ..........................$ 23,936.74 0 ANDREWS WELL DRILLING (OUTSTANDING VOUCHER)........... $ 2,052.00 - $ 37,007.24 TOTAL EXPECTED COSTS TO FINALIZE CLOSURE, o ACTUAL COST FOR COMPLETION OF PSIP AND SIR .............$ 37,007.24 o CHAZEN PROPOSAL FOR FINAL CLOSURE PLAN .................$ 4,575.00 $ 41,582.24 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Drrtchess County Office.- PO ffice;PO Box 3479, 229B Page Park, Manchester Road Poughkeepsie, DIY 12603 Phone: (914) 454-3980 Fax: (914) 454-4026 August 6, 1992 Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, NY 1260 RE: Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Dear Peter: Pursuant to our conversation on August 5, 1992, I have prepared the following proposal to study the in-place materials covering the Castle Point Landfill in regard to the DEC's letter dated July 30, 1992. The following work tasks will be required to determine the thickness of the in place cover and its permeability: Task 1: Determining the Thickness of the In-place Ca 10 soil cores will be taken of the cover material in the area shown on the attached figure. The soil material will be described and the core holes filled with bentonite clay. The costs for Task 1, to obtain ten soil cores of the cover material, is estimated as follows: Two technicians @ $240/ea/day x 1 day = $ 4$0. Geologist @ $400/day x 1.5 days $ 600. Bentonite 100 lbs. @ $50. _ $ 50. Equipment $75/day x 1 day $75, Subtotal — $1205, Task 2: Permeability of the In -Place Cover Material 10 locations will be selected for in-place hydraulic conductivity testing as shown on the attached figure. In addition, soil cores will be taken at these same locations for falling head permeability testing performed at The Chazen Offices. These tests will be performed following the attached Chazen Environmental Services protocols. The cost for performing the permeability analysis is estimated as follows: . Technician 2 man crew @ $240/ea/day x 4 days = $ 1920, Bentonite 100 lbs. @ $50. = 50. Subtotal = $ 1970 THE Ch=n Engineering G Land 5urveyrn Ca„ P. C. RaenPAN ES CSW ra Sys ementrr!$ervirrr, inc. EnuiroPlun l{tsurirrrer, lnc. CSW Dara Spsternt, Gu. Task 3: Report Preparation Draftsperson @ $240/day x .5 day = $ 120. Technician @ $240/day x 1 day = $ 240. Geologist @ $400/day x 1 day = $ 400. Senior Geologist @ 640/day x I day $640, Subtotal = $ 1400. Total for Tasks I - 3 The project can begin immediately following authorization to proceed and the estimated completion time is within 10 working days after the start date. Please direct any questions concerning this proposal to me. Sincerely, -Timothy . Welling, P.G. Director TGW:dI encl. `e Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING PROTOCOL 1) A sample location is selected, representative of the soils to be tested. 2) Vegetation and soil materials are carefully excavated to expose the undisturbed soil layer to be tested. 3) A thin walled metal cylinder, approximately 4 cm, in diameter and 15 cm long, is pushed into the soil to a depth of 10 cm. 4a) If the permeability testing is to take place in the field, bentonite is placed around the outside of the metal cylinder, at the interface of the soil surface, to form a water tight seal (see filed setup diagram) 4b) If field testing is not desired, the sample cylinder is carefully excavated and brought back to the Chazen facilities for testing. The bottom of the cylinder is wrapped with filter material to prevent soil loss during the test. The wrapped cylinder is then placed on a gravel bed to allow water to exit through the filter material (see office setup diagram). 5) The cylinder containing the sample to be tested is filled with water and allowed to stabilize for a period of time sufficient to completely saturate the soil within the cylinder. Additional water is added as needed to replace the water adsorbed by the soil. 6) After soil saturation is achieved, the water level within the cylinder is adjusted so that the depth of water is about 3 cm. above the soil level. l The date, time, and depth of water is then recorded. 7) An evaporation monitoring cylinder, similar in size and material to the " sample cylinder, is set up in the vicinity of the sample being tested and filled to a level approximating the water level in the sample cylinder. This water level is recorded along with the sample information. 8) Periodically, the sample cylinder and the evaporation cylinder are checked and the date, time, and water level in each cylinder is recorded. The Chazen Companies Hydraulic Conductivilyy Testing PmlocoI Page 1 Of 2 .y 9) Permeability, "K", in cm/sec, is calculated, based on the change in water level over time, according to the following equation: K = ((Ho - H,/t) - ((Eo - El)/t) Where: HQ = Depth of water in test cylinder (cm) at the start of the test period. H, = Depth of water in test cylinder (cm) at the end of the test period. Eo = Depth of water in evaporation cylinder (cm) at the start of the test period. E, = Depth of water in evaporation cylinder (cm) at the end of the test period. t = Time in seconds between the start and end of the test. FIELD SETUP OFFICE SETUP Irface se Cloth Grave! E E� 01 song 8oitom ppo�8Op o gao Oo ojoop0oao The Chazen Com anies Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Protocol Page 2 of 2 JUNE 11, 1992 CHRONOLOGY OF LANDFILL HISTORY ■ Used For CIean-Up Day Activities ■ From to 1986 ■ Status - No Longer in Operation Paggi & Martin and'Chazen Environmental Services Inc. Page 1 CASTLE POINT LANDFILL JUNE 11, 1992 CHRONOLOGY OF LANDFILL INVESTIGATION ■ Town Entered Consent Order 1987 ■ Prepared Proposed Subsurface Investigation Program (PSIP) 1991 ■ Implemented of Subsurface Investigation Report (SIR) In Progress ACTION ■ Closure Natural Soil Cover ($20 K- $30 K/acre) Ys. Artificial Cover ($200 K/acre) Paggi & Martin and Chaco n it not nt I rvi i Page 2 CASTLE POINT LANDFILL JUNE 11, 1992 REPORT ■ Natural Iron and Manganese exceeds NYS Groundwater Standards ■ Landfill is not (in our opinion) source of Iron and Manganese DEC DECISIONS ■ If Landfill causes groundwater standard contravention, then expensive cover will be required Martin and Qlaze" Envirosmigntal &ryices. Inc. Parc G CASTLE POINT LANDFILL JUNE 11, 1992 RECOMMENDATION ■ Permission to Submit Report to State ■ Convince State to Accept Less Expensive Cover nd Qtvir nm nt 1 SeryjMe. Page 7 7-7 77 ZZ, =n DUTCHESS COUNTY NEW YORK Prepared by: Paggi & Martin Engineering Corp. 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. 2291 Page Park, Manchester Road Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 CASTLE POINT LANDFILL TOWN OF WAPPINGER DUTCHESS COUNTY NEW YORK LANDFILL CLOSURE REPORT JANUARY 1993 Prepared by: Paggi & Martin Engineering Corp. 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. 229B Page Park, Manchester Road Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Summary........................................................... 1 II. Schedule of Post -Closure Care ...................................... 1 III. Proposed Final Grades & Subsequent Land Use ..................... 2 A. Slopes & Contours ............................................... 2 B. Slope Stability ................................................... 2 C. Subsequent Land Use ........................................... 2 D. Surface Drainage Patterns & Control ............................ 3 IV. Gas Venting........................................................ 3 A. Plan for Determining Zone of Zero Gas Migration ................ 3 B. Location & Design of Venting Systems ............................ 4 C. Schedule of Installation & Monitoring ........................... 4 V. Soil Cap............................................................. 5 A. Quantity of Source in Schedule of Placement .................... 5 B. Testing Procedures .............................................. 6 C. Additives Used 7 D. Permeability of Requirements ................................... 7 E. Landscaping Plan ........................................ I...... 7 I F. Soil Loss Prevention ............................................. 8 VI. Leachate Control .................................................... 8 VII. Vector Abatement Program ......................................... 9 A. Schedule of Operation & Post -Closure Care ...................... 9 B. Materials Used .................................................. 9 C. Subcontractor Used .............................................. 9 D. Methods Used..................................................10 VIII. Post -Closure Care, Monitoring & Recording ......................... 10 A. Erosion Control & Remediation ................................. 11 I B. Leachate Control & System Maintenance ....................... 11 ! C. Gas Monitoring & System Maintenance ........................ 12 D. Groundwater & Surface Water Monitoring ..................... 12 E. Reporting.......................................................13 IX. Certification.......................................................13 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) FIGURES (Figures are located in back pocket) Figure 1: Existing Site Plan Figure 2: Final Site Pian APPENDICES Appendix A.: Preliminary Report; Castle Point Landfill, October, 1992 Appendix B.: Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling Schedule Parameters & Protocol Appendix C: Soil Cap Material Testing Results !'ag" 1 LANDFILL CLOSURE REPORT CASTLE POINT LANDFILL TOWN OF WAPPINGER, DUTCHESS COUNTY NEW YORK I. Summary This Landfill Closure Report was prepared by Paggi & Martin Engineering Corp. and. Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. (CES) for the Town of Wappinger. This report was prepared in response to Article VIII (Closure) of the Order on Consent (Case No. 3-1432/8707) entered into between the Town of Wappinger and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Following approval of this Landfill Closure Report, the Town of Wappinger will implement this plan within the time frame identified in the text. II. Schedule of Post-CIosure Care This landfill has not accepted materials and was covered by soil material prior to 1990. Pursuant to its closure, a partial cap has been placed upon it. A preliminary report prepared by Chazen Environmental Services in October 1992 (see Appendix A.) determined that approximately 1.8 acres of the total 3.2 acre site does not meet criteria specified by the New York State DEC letter to the Town dated July 30, 1992 of T of cover having a permeability of 1 x 10 .g centimeters per second or slower. Based on this information, the area shown on Figure 1 will receive additional cover to meet these requirements with the permeability of less P,Ige Y than 1 x 10-5 centimeters per second. This work is planned to be completed no later than two years following acceptance of this closure plan by NYSDEC. III. Proposed Final Grades & Subsequent Land Use A. Slopes & Contours: The areas shown on Figure 1 will be filled and regraded to provide a northwesterly to southeasterly downgradient slope. The regrading, as shown on the final site plan, Figure 2, will result in a landfill with a gently sloping topography within in the minimum range of 4% to a maximum of 33% over the 3.2 acre site. ] B. Slope Stability: The final slopes will be from a minimum of 4% to a maximum of 33% to provide the necessary slope to promote surface runoff, yet not too severe to i encourage slope instability. C. Subsequent Land Use: Subsequent land use of the landfill area by the Town of Wappin.ger is in the form of community recreation. Landfill area is designated for passive recreation activities such as hiking, nature study, and Little League baseball/softball. Page :3 D. Surface Drainage Patterns in Control: The site will be regraded to permit overland stormwater runoff to drain in a southeasterly direction, away from the landfill area. IV. Gas Venting A. Determination of Zone of Zero Gas Migration: During the installation of the perimeter groundwater monitoring wells and soil borings in 1991, combustible gases were not noted. In addition, Well PW413, installed at the surface of the shallow groundwater, was remonitored for combustible gases and found to contain none. No lateral migration of gas is r believed to have occurred beyond the landfill. As part of the five year post -closure Imonitoring program, the perimeter wells will be monitored for the presence of methane gas using a combustible gas indicator at the same schedule and frequency as undertaken for the groundwater sampling program. (Refer to Section VIII D and Appendix B). Should the presence of as be detected in the perimeter wells g p , additional vents will be installed as necessary to prevent the lateral migration of gas beyond the landfill mass. Page B. Location & Design of Venting Systems: As depicted on the Final Site Plan included with this report, gas vents will be installed at a ratio of 1 per acre and will be located at the high points of the solid waste material. These locations will prevent methane gas from building up under the cap. Details of the vents are included on the Final Site Plan Figure 2. C. Schedule of Installation & Monitoring:. q is The gas vents will be installed on the landfill mass immediately following the placement of the landfill cap. The venting system will be subject to visual quarterly inspections per Section VIII. f41geS V. Soil Cap A. Quantity & Source & Schedule of Placement: The area designated on Figure 1 will be covered with an 18" cap of natural materials with permeability of 1 x 10 _g centimeters per second or less. This layer will be covered with a 6" layer of topsoil. Soil cap placement will proceed from a west to east direction across the landfill. Sources of such material meeting this permeability requirement have been found within a close radius to the landfill site at Trap Rock Quarry, Wappinger, New York. Appendix B includes additional information concerning the specifics of these capping materials. These materials were tested by both CES and Soil Material Testing, Inc. in Castleton, New York. The cap will be constructed of these materials or an equivalent source based on availability and cost at the time of material purchase and closure. A protective soil layer with a minimum thickness of 6" will be installed on top of the soil cap. This soil layer will protect the cap from physical damage due to erosive forces by wind and water. Soil will also serve to grow vegetation to further protect the landfill from erosion. l'arg'e G B. Testing Procedures for Cap Material: The following testing procedures will be performed on the capping material selected prior to its placement in the landfill to insure that its performance standards are not less than 1 x 10 s centimeters per second. A preliminary grain size analysis and falling head conductivity test have already been performed on materials from the Trap Rock Quarry site and are enclosed in Appendix C. TEST ASTM FREQUENCY Grain Size D422 1,000 cu. yds. Moisture Content D6998 1,000 cu. yds. Atterberg Limits (liquid limit & plasticity index) D423 -D424 4,000 cu. yds. Clay mineralogy None 5,000 cu. yds. or change in material Capilary Head None 1 per acre Moisture Density Curve 5,000 cu. yds. or change in material Moisture Density Test D2922 9 per acre per lift Laboratory Permeability None 5,000 cu. yds. or change in material Falling head permeability in field None 1 per acre Mtge 7 C. Additives Used: No soil additives are anticipated to be necessary for the soil cap to meet the performance standards of 1 x 10 -5 centimeters per second. 1 D. Permeability Requirements: The permeability of the proposed soil cap material will meet standard of 1 x 10-1 centimeters per second or less. (Footnote: the density and permeability of the soil cap material testing performed in laboratory will be done using 5 to 15 blows per compaction test performed). E. Landscaping Plan: Following closure of the landfill and completion of final grading, all areas will be seeded to promote a grass cover. A seed mixture as Kentucky bluegrass and j thin -leaved fescue will grow'well on these anticipated acidic well drained sandy I loam soils in full sun. These grasses will require initial fertilization following I seeding. The grass cover will provide nutrients to the soil, control erosion and sedimentation, and provide nesting and foraging habitat for native wildlife. Shrubs and trees will not be planted on the landfill mass itself so as to not allow root Page 8 penetration through the landfill cap. Refer to Figure 2 for additional planting information. F. Soil Loss Prevention: The gentle slopes and the grass cover will minimize soil erosion from both wind and rainfall. In addition, quarterly visual inspections of the site will be performed to determine if any erosion has taken place. Upon identification, the necessary remedial erosion control measures will be undertaken. VI. Leachate Control Leachate control systems have not been designed as part of this landfill closure plan. The soil cap will prevent rainwater from infiltrating into the landfill mass, thus restricting potential leachate development. The grading of the site, as discussed in previous sections, will encourage surface water to flow off the landfill mass and thus, in addition, preventing further leachate from forming. 1'ux r 9 VII. Vector Abatement Program A Schedule of Operation & Post -Closure Care: The primary method of vector control will be through the installation of the soil cap and topsoil cover. Secondarily, post -closure quarterly visual inspections will be conducted over the first five year period to identify the presence of any vectors which may inhabit the Iandfill including, but not limited to, rodents, insects, and birds. Should vectors be discovered the ill y w be removed an a manner consistent with the DEC and other recommended guidelines. B. Materials Used: The cover will include an 18" soil cap and 6" of protective topsoil. C. Subcontractor Used: The Town of Wappinger personnel will be responsible for conducting the quarterly visual inspections and for implementing any necessary vector control measures. Page to D. Methods Used: The site inspector will observe any holes made by burrowing animals or other evidence of the presence of vectors. If the landfill soil cap has been found to be damaged it will be restored to its original specification. Should the landfill require any additional treatment for rodents, birds, or insect control, Region 3 DEC personnel, specifically the Pesticide Officer, will be contacted to approve any proposed extermination method prior to its implementation. VIII. Post -Closure Care, Monitoring & Reporting Quarterly visual inspections of the site will be conducted by the Town consultant for a period of five years following completion of the landfill closure. These reports will be at the Town Hall. These inspections will include the soil cap and topsoil, venting system, site drainage, specifically any items such as subsidence of the soil cap, areas of erosion, dead or dying vegetation, vandalism, and other vectors will be reported immediately to Town personnel followed by taking of corrective action. In addition, CES will perform quarterly and annual groundwater quality monitoring following the attached sample protocols located in Appendix B. A. Erosion Control and Remediation: The grass vegetative cover overlying the soil cap will be the primary means of erosion control. Quarterly inspections will determine if any slumping or subsidence in the soil cover has occurred, any changes of an unnatural degree have occurred in the vegetative cover, any ponding of rainwater on the surface, any apparent observation of leachate outcropping to the surface, any signs of soil erosion such as channeling be noted on the quarterly inspection report forms. In addition, maintenance of the vegetative cover to prevent shrubs and saplings from •owing on the landfill cap and penetrating the cover must be maintained. B. Leachate Control & System Maintenance: No leachate collection system has been designed as part of the original landfill operation or as part of this closure plan. The topography of the landfill will be such that surface runoff will flow away from the landfill and prevent the formation of leachate. During the quarterly inspections, leachate outcropping will be looked for. j If found, it will be immediately noted and proper engineering control measures 1 implemented such as patching of the cap area undertaken. Page 12 C. Gas Monitoring & System Maintenance: Monitoring for combustible gases, i.e., methane, will be performed on the same frequency as the groundwater sampling as identified in VIII D below. Air monitor well PMW4a will be tested for combustible gases. D. Groundwater Monitoring- The onitoring The groundwater wells numbered PMW3, PMW4a, PMW5, and PMW7 will be sampled yearly for iron and manganese, along with field determinations of pH conductivity and turbidity. In the event that iron and manganese in excess of 0.3 milligrams per liter each above background, or a combined concentration of 0.5 milligrams per liter above background, or pH outside the range of 6.5 to 8.5, additional samples will be collected from those wells on a quarterly basis for a one year period to determine if this parameter is coming from the landfill or part of the background system. In addition to that particular well, the upgradient Well PMW-3 also will be monitored on a quarterly basis for that same year period to determine if the upgradient groundwater system is supplying the parameter and not the landfill itself. Following the five years of monitoring, if standards are not exceeded, the groundwater monitoring will be discontinued. Polo 13 E. Reporting: An annual report will be submitted to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation which contains an analysis of the groundwater quality sampling and annual inspection report submitted by the Town of Wappinger identifying results of the quarterly visual inspections, and any maintenance necessary during the year. IX. Certification The plans have been certified by licensed professional engineers registered to practice engineering in the State of New York. APPENDIX A Chazen Environmental SStrvices. Inc. CASTLE POINT LANDFILL CLO SURE STUDY PRELIMINARY REPORT _ OCTOBER 1992 Prepared By-, Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. Phone: (914)4543980 Fac (914)4544026 PO Box 3479, 229-B Page Park Manchester Road Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 CHAZEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Dnrcbm Corrrrryy Offlcr, PO Box 3-379, 229B Page Park, Manchester Road Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Phone; (914) 454-3980 Fax: (914) 454-4026 October 8, 1992 Peter Paggi Paggi & Martin 54-56 Main Street . Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Re: Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Preliminary Report Dear Peter: In fulfillment of our proposal dated August 6, 1992, Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. (CES) has prepared the following preliminary report for your review. The three basic work tasks defining the scope of work for this project are as follows: 1) determine the thickness of the in-place cover material; 2) determine the permeability of the in-place cover material, and 3) report these data to you in a written format. TASK 1 Determination of Thickness of In-place Cover Material Ten soil cores -mere taken and described. The descriptions of these material plus the depth measurements of an additional 24 excavations are located in Appendix A of this report. This cover material basically consisted of light brown fine sand with some silt in trace of sub -rounded fine to coarse gravel with occasional cobble to stone size. coarse fragments. This material was very dense underlying the topsoil where present. During the coarse of this study, we found C&D Material, such as plastic bags, and metal fragments at various depths, as shown on are Figure 2 and photos 1 - 4. The depths showed variability from the required 24" to shallowness of 4". CES reported these findings to you via a September telephone conversation.. We discussed this issue and decided to further defined this area of insufficient shallow cover material. Our estimated area is shown on Figure 2. This area is staked in the field with the corresponding map numbers. The area of the landfill showing cover material less than the required 24" of thickness is approximately 1.5 acres in size. However, during CES's visual inspection of the total area following the Town's cutting of vegetation, a few pieces of C&D material were noted on the surface of the areas indicated to have 24" of cover. TASK 2 Permeability of In-place Cover Material Initially, ten locations were selected for in-place hydraulic conductivity testing. The very dense gravelly in-place cover material required CES staff to modify their test procedure. Soil samples were collected in the field at depths from 0" to 12" and 12" 05a en £ugirrrrring v Loid S+n7tying Ca.; P.[.; GnviroPGm Assiociarrs, Int. THE CCN14pA2ba �S n Cha:en Ermirnn lttrual SrmirrJ, Mur. CSW Dara Swlrens, lar. to 24". These materials were placed into cylinders and packed to mimic field conditions. The cylinders were then tested following the hydraulic conductivity protocol located in Appendix B. Based on the results of the initial ten samples, three additional field samples were collected and analyzed. The results of these permeability tests are shown in Appendix B and on Figure 3. The permeability requirements by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) are soils of 18" in thickness with a permeability of less than 1 x 10"5 cm./sec. The initial test results found two areas of the site have permeabilities which are faster than the allowable rate. Three additional permeability samples were taken to try and further define and decrease the area required for recompaction or receiving additional cover. However, the soils in this area were found to contain more coarse sand and also failed the permeability test. These are samples labelled 11, 12 and 13. CONCLUSION These areas are defined on Figure 4 and incorporates an area approximately 1.8 acres in size. As a result of this investigation, the following information was determined. Two areas on the existing landfill cover do not meet either thickness requirements or permeability requirements. A total of approximately 1.5 acres of area needs an increase in cover material with a permeability meeting NYSDEC requirements. Please note that the area of thickness and permeability basically overlap each other. ' RECOMMENDATIONS • Bring on-site a sufficient quantity of material which can be compacted in p approximate 6" lifts to permeability of less than 1 x 10". A total of 12" of this low permeability material is required. Cover the areas defined by location P-11 through P-13 which have sufficient thickness of material, however, the permeability is too fast. Following our retest, we feel as though this area cannot be compacted to meet requirements due to the coarse nature of the material present. • Remove the incidental pieces of debris located on the surface of the cover material. • The Town may be able to save costs by bringing material on-site similar to that which is present for the cover material now, the source of which is unknown to us. This material, when compacted, has met the requirements of NYSDEC. • If, however, these materials are not available, a silty clay material would be required to be brought on-site and compacted and tested to meet these New York State requirements. • Cover this low permeability material with 12" of soil material capable of supporting grass. The Town may be able to supply this material at a lesser cost. CES has estimated the cost to bring these materials in from a local source, Trap Rock Quarry, and spread this material and compact it in b" lifts, followed by covering this low permeability material with the topsoil and finally, testing it. The estimate to perform these tasks is over $100,000. We have included a rough break -down for your review. We know that these costs are very high and that a possible substitution of material can be accomplished to reduce the cost significantly. Please review the information presented and contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, f 1Timothy Welling, , P.G. Director TGW:dl encl. a l Figure #1 Castle Point Landfill Cap Sampling Locations Drawn 6v: luOle : _ . _ --- @)—C1-10 — Soil Borings pprove y File Name: (i)—C11-34 --Excavated Holes r""""" ")" Chazen Environmental .Services, Inc. 0-24.0 Q-24.0 0 100 200 (reel) 0-24.0 0-24.0 X4.0 / Q-24.0 / -18.0 0-24.0 p-24.0 (t)-4.0 (:-Y- 2,4.0 I 24.0-C- .a-24.0 I I X24.0 20,0-v I G-24.0 I , I U-6.0-50 24.0.-� O- 1 5.0 U-1 4.5 . A \ 22.0-0/ t-24.0 24.0\ O♦ / 0/ � 4.00-24:010.0 14:5 18.0,20.5 Q-11.0 L —Area of Iess than 24" of cover 0-24.0 — Depth of cover (inches) CASTLE POINT LANDFILL Recrr.plion Arcp Figure #2 Castle Point Landfill Cap Sampling Locations Drawn by: Dal Mober. 199 Approve Y= file Norms: ,epored by: Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. O-- P 2 C�-- P 3 0-P4 ©-P1 ®-P5 O -P6 0 100 200 (Feet) O -P 1 1 O -P12 ®-- P9 O -P7 O—P8 0-1-13 - Permeability Test Material Locations P1 3-0 O -Pio CASTLE POINT LANDFI ke<reolioq Arca ^moo wo ��g .ra �4a NmT. II undary OI La nd 1l11 A% Figure. #3 Castle Point Landfill Permeabilty Sampling Locations Drawn by: Dat ATNQ�pp_iZ(j�atzLc �}ci.obei-. ] 99� pproved by: File Name: C'.\ ennpc t Inndf111.Aw Prepared by: Chazen Environmentab Services, Inc. APPENDIX A Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C1 08/26/92 o Light brown, fine sand, some sift, trace subrounded coarse gravel, abundant fine roots, dry, firm. 4.0-15.5 Light brown, fine sand, little silt, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 15,5-19.0 C & D material encountered. (plastic bag, decomposing leaves) 19,0-24.o Grey - brown, fine - coarse sand, little silt, trace fine - medium gravel, wood, moist, medium dense. 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil Cinches) Identification C2 08/26/92 0.0-4.o Light brown, fine sand, some silt, trace fine gravel, abundant fine roots, dry, firm. 4,0.14.5 Light brown, fine sand, little silt, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 14.5-24.0 Crushed rock. 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C3 08/26/92 0.0-4.s Light brown, fine - medium sand, little silt, trace fine - medium gravel, abundant fine roots, dry, firm. 4.5-21.5 Light brown, fine -medium sand, little silt, trace fine -medium gravel, dry, very dense. 21.5-24.0 Brown, fine - medium sand, trace silt, dry, loose. 24.0 End of boring. Boring 10 Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C5 1;..-.'1-1 ... I . 08/26/92 ........ ... . ..... 0,0-24.o ....... . ............... . ...... Light brown, silt, little fine sand, tracefine gravel, dry, very dense. 24,0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil I Cinches) Identification C5 08/26/92 0.0-4.o Light brown, silt, little fine - medium sand, common fine roots, dry, firm. 4.0-24.o Light brown, silt, little fine - medium sand, trace fine gravel, few crushed rock, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. IGeologist: L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 1 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations ,.,....:.. ..w..>.... .�.. , a..:.A,....:.,v...:..,•,ac..-:,�:.fac..,:r:.,r:f::.,aa•.:::..:,v�-:�::.t�: ^.::::.:-:: �::.,•:.ai•..•:.�`c•2o-i.•,s,�`•`.'�f,°.•':.�:u��55u:::,:.,...:...::.;�•.,fi.:v �o- w:.•s �;::> .:a:.:..::' ..�:ti� ::•:•.�.. ,:..:..�:.. ....... Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (nches) Identification CS0826,92 / / .,:,,.:..:.'.:...,::::::::..:::.: 0.0 24.o Light brown, fine medium sand, little silt, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 24.0 End.of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C7 08/26/92 0.0 1s.o M....... ......... ....::....,: ......... _. ......... Light brown, silt, little fine sand,trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 18.0. End of boring, split spoon refusal. Refer to excavation #33. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C9 / s/s2 0.0-5.o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine gravel, common fine -medium roots, dry, firm. 5.0-14.5 Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine gravel, dry, very dense. 14.5-24.0 C & D material encountered. (Brown, fine sand, little silt, black ashes, wood, dry, medium dense.) 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID :.,. Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C9 08/26/92 :,... 0.0-4.o ....- .......... .. .......... . ... .. _.... ........ Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine - medium gravel, common fine roots, dry, firm. 4:0- 24.o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace fine - medium gravel, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C10 06/26/92 wk o.o -+s.5 Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace gravel, abundant fine -medium roots, dry, firm 5.5 - 11.o Light brown, silt, little fine sand, trace gravel, dry, very dense. 11.0-24.o Light brown, silt, little fine - medium sand, trace fine gravel, crushed rock, small subrounded to rounded pebbles, dry, very dense. 24.0 End of boring. Geologist- L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 2 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations Boring j ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C12 0.9/24/92 a Grey brown, fine sand, some silt, little angular to subrounded fine gravel, dry, firm. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring JD Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C12 0.9/24/92 0.0-24.o .......... ........... .. . ......... ....... ...... Grey brown, fine sand, some silt, little angular to subrounded fine gravel, dry, firm. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C13 09/24/92 0.0 - 24.o Light -brown, fine sand, little angular to subrounded fine - medium gravel, trace silt, dry, firm. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring 10 Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C14 09/15/92 0,0-24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged, 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C15 09/16/92 0.0- 24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions 24.0 End of excavation. Geologist: L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 3 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C-1 6 09116/92 0.0-24.0 Excavation performed for cover depth ' only.No, soil descrip 1 o'n' si� . 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID --. Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification 1-'.'..' C17 og/16/92 :,.;" o.o-24.o ;-.,.";..-,;-;,;.;,,;...;.,�;.''...... ,,�..'�,......... .,I ..... I I . . .......... Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C18 09/16/92 - 16.0 Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 14.5 C & D material encountered. (Metal pipe, plastic scraps and plastic cap.) 16.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification 9 09/16/92 o.o -18.o '-.................................. Excavation ... for ... cover e*'r' e ... pt" h*' * 'o' ... n1*y"'.'N'o'soi1 descriptions.logged. 18.0 C & D material encountered. (Plastic bag and decomposing leaves.) 18.0 End of excavation. Boring 0 Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification 620 09/18/92 0.0 .24.0. Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Geologist L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 4 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations MMI vx= Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C2 09/18/92 0.0 - 5.D Excavation � d'for cover depth onij.7 'soil descriptions 5.0 C & D material encountered, (Scrap sheet metal) 5.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C22 09/18/92 0,0-24.0 ............. .... Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation, Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C23 09/18/92 o,o-15.o Excavation performed for Cover depth only. No soil descriptions I'ogg' e ... d"." * ....... ......................... 15.0 C & D material encountered. (Wood and ceramic tile.) 15,0 End of excavation. Boring ID I Date "09/18/92 Depth of Soi; (inches) Identification C25 09/18/92 0.0-10.0 Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged..~..., 10.0 C & D material encountered. (Painted wooden board) 1010 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C25 09/18/92 0.0-11.0 Excavation performed r'cover *depth only. No soil dwscripti'ons logged. 11.0 C & D material encountered. (Wood and foam insulation.) 11.0 End of excavation. Geologist. L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 5 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification 26 09/18/92 0.0-24-a Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation, Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C27 09/18/92 0.0-24-o Excavation performed for cover ';' depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C28 og/1 s/92 0.0-22.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 22.0 C & D material encountered. (Styrofoam) 22,0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C29 09/21/92 0.0-20.o .................... .............. Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 20.0 C & D material encountered. (Styrofoam, plastic and duct tape.) 20.0 I End of excavation. Boring 10 Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C30 09/21/92 0.0-24.o Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24.0 I End of excavation Geologist. L. Zeller Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 6 of 7 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Soil Boring Information Soil Boring Logs at Selected Locations Boring 10 Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification -62—' 2 0.0-24,0 Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 24,0 End of excavation, Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification -62—' "0-8"/-2' ... "": 2 .... ............ * .. " 0.0-12.o ........ :"'"':": . ...... . .................. .................. ' ...........................• ................. . ....... '':' " Excavation performed for cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 6.0 C & D material encountered. (Metal canister scrap, electronic parts, wires and plastic.) 12.0 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification C33 09/14/92 0,0.20.5 Excavation performed for cover depth Only. No soil descriptions logged. 20.5 C & D material encountered. (Foam insulation and decomposed organic materials.) 20.5 End of excavation. Boring ID Date Depth of Soil (inches) Identification 09/14/92 0.0 m 24.o .. ............. Excavation performed cover depth only. No soil descriptions logged. 4.0 C & D material encountered. (Metal scrap and plastic.) Excavation performed for cover depth only. 24.0 End of excavation . Geologist -.L, Zeller . Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations i..%M:{.vw ^.My»:n:-. :+!:.h:.y.. hv,M^ J::hiv;.'r.?'•i:•+:::.i+'9MG.:.v..::�..iiii:L.i:.i>i::•::: •iiia. -F.":�ria}.'., ::. �D/.,x..i"+.., n t+n ,ww, ,., ., n „�nn:�?�ra.... .....�'.a?nxk.SFs++.r, ..,N. .n...,a.,.{..,• .., �......... n. .. ... .... ...... ....... .w.�. Cylinder 1D Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P1a 1 09/03/92 12:24:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:10:00 96360 3.4 1.6 1.45E-05 P1a 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 1 16:01:00 1 1110601 3.0 2.0 9.00E-06 Average: 1.18E -05i Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P2a 1 09/16/92 08:03:00 0 2:0 3A Start 09/17/92 07:53:00 85800 2.5 2.5 5.83E-06 P2a 2 09/18/92 09:26:00 0 2,0 3.0 Start 09/18/92 16:15:00 1 24540 2.2 2.8 8.15E-06 Average: 6.99E-06 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P2b 1 09/03/92 1224:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:10:00 96360 2.9 2.1 9.34E-06 P2b 2 09/08/92 09:11:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:01:00 111000 2.4 1 2.6 1 3.60E-06 Average: 6.47E-06 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm, Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. a. Pia 1 09/16/92 08:03:00 0 w M2.0 3.0 09/17/92 07:54:00 85860 2.7. 2.3 8.15E-06 P3a 2 09/18/92 09:35:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/18/92 16:16:00 240601 2.1 2.9 1 4.16E-06 Average: 6.15E-06 a = upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 1 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm, Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P3b 1 ..,............................. 09/03/92 1225:00 .... .................. 0 •....................... 2.0 .............................. 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:11:00 96360 2.5 2.5 5.19E-06 P3b 2 09/08/92 09:11:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:02:00 1 111060 2.4 1 2.6 1 3.60E-06 Average: 4.40E-06 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. ...P4.. ..... a :...... 1 .... .. .. 09/03/92 ............... 12:25:00 ....... 0 ,.......:: 2.,.�..v....... 0 .....v.-.... '3-0 .....: ,_�,,,,....,..:..,..,.:.,._ ::..Start::.,_.... 09/04/92 15:11:00 96360 2.0 3.0 < 1.04E-07 P4a 2 09/08/92 09:12:00 01 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:02:00 1110001 2.1 1 2.9 1 9.01 E-07 Average: I <5.02E-07 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm, Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P5 1 09/03/92 12:26:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/17/92 07:54:00 85860 2.1 2.9 1.16E-06 P4b 2 09/18/92 09:36:00 01 2.0 3.0 Start 09/18/92 16:17:00 240601 2.1 1 2.9 4.16E-06 Average: 2.66E-06 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P5 1 09/03/92 12:26:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:11:00 96300 .2.4 2.6 4.15E-06 P5a 2 09/08/92 09:12:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:02:00 111000 2.1 2.9 9.01 E-07 Average: 2.53E-06 a = upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 2 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations +4\.. ..i , l':ti}kF :.h '.' .,Y..\ ny}�•.?:.v't:i.:-0y:+:�n::dii�::::n�:�:::..:.:.:.:.:.::.;.:..:'f'::4::'.i,•:.::.ti:::.iY..i:(r,!.�i:vi:: ;{iii:•::ibi+': „ u.:..,:a,xa+a.R:.+:..,:;.::,.N•Vi':+�i.''.'.:.aka.:..: dvnY..vebkalkn4,. Hvvvv.,n.-'.4N.�,..A�a+a:4k\�:LVvlcvnv�v��z�buv�.,avv.v. .,. nA. .<. ....<... ?. Gs+! r. ... i..:?e s:., : F„ �.:...nv Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity 'cm./sec. P5b 1 09/16/92 08:04:00 0 17 3.0 Start 1 09/03/92 09/17/92 07:56:40 85920 1.7 3.0 < 1.16E-07 P5b 2 09/18/92 09:38:00 01 1.7 3.0 Start 2 09/08/92 09/18/92 16:17:00 239401 1.7 3.0 <4.18E-07 Average: <2.67E-07 Cylinder ID Test. No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P6a 1 09/16/92 08:05:00 0 1.7 3.0 �......+...,Start.,:..... 1 09/03/92 09/17/92 07:53:00 85680 n/a n/a n/a P6a 2 09/18/92 09:39:00 0 1.7 3.0 Start 2 09/08/92 09/18/92 16:18:00 1 23940 1.7 3.0 <4.18E-07 Average: <4.18E-07 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P6bh.. ::::.: :09/03/92....12:27:04 real sec. ..1'1--.'-.1.-r--" 2.0.� v 3.0 w Start W. 1 09/03/92 09/04/92 15:12:00 96300 2.3 2.7 3.12E-06 P6b 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 2 09/08/92 09/09/92 16:01:00 1 111060 2.1 2.9 9.00E-07 Average: 2.01 E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. I'7b 1 09/03/92 12:27:04 0 2.0 3.4 Start 09/04/92 15:12:00 96300 3.5 1.5 1.56E-05 P7b 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 49/09/92 16:01:04 1 111060 2.6 2.4 5.44E-06 Average: 1.05E-05 a = upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 3 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P8a(I) 1 09/16/92 08:05:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/17/92 07:57:00 85920 5.0 0.0 3.49E-05 P8a(I) 2 09/18/92 09:39:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/18/92 1 16:18:00 23940 3.1 1.9 4.59E-05 Average: 4.04E-05 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm, Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P8a(I1) 1 09/03/92 12:28:00 0 2.0 ...:.., 3.0 .......:..:.:::.....:...::..::...: .:......:.. Start 09/04/92 15:13:00 96300 5.0 0.0 3.12E-05 P8a(II) 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:01:00 1 1110601 5.0 1 0.0 1 2.70E-05 Averag e: 2.91 E-05 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water em. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. 9a". 1 09/16/92 08.06:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:14:00 96240 4.4 0.6 2.49E-05 P9a 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:01:00 1110601 3.7 1 1.3 1 1.53E-05 Average: 2.01 E-05 Cylinder ID Test No. Date Elapsed Time real sec. Depth to Water cm. Depth of Water cm. Hydraulic Conductivity cm./sec. P9b 1 09/16/92 08.06:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/17/92 07:58:00 85920 4.2 0.8 2.56E-05 P9b 2 09/18/92 09:40:00 01 2.0 3.0 Start 09/18/92 16:18:00 238801 2.7 1 2.3 2.93E-05 Average: 2.75E-05 a = Upper b = lower Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 4 of 6 I Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected Locations .vyu......:.. .v =•h v. fyrr ...::: .. .,. _...... , t..: : n.:.. #„ }, a'�k.."wark�i'o�ax<s- ..n.1v.:n k. �+..:L:cv::' > ! ••�, ^;:W"`d Y `•:;.. v: oti•: „�>?. xw .oux,a'hv:.s.� .r:n�3.ik.<a *.,. •::::va Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P10a 1 09/16/92 08:03:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/17/92.07:54:00 15:14:00 85860 5.0 0.0 3.49E-05 P1 Oa 2 09/18/92 09:42:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/18/92 16:19:0023820 111060 1 4.8 0.2 1.18E-04 Average: 7.62E-05 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P10b 1 09/03/92 12:30:00 02.0 1..•5.:,:..A,.. - 3.0 Start 09/04/92 15:14:00 96240 5.0 0.0 3.12E-05 P1 Ob 2 09/08/92 09:10:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/09/92 16:01:00 111060 1 5.0 0.0 2.70E-05 Average: 2.91 E-05 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID .:P.1:1.... No. :..1::. Date real sec. .16:11:00:. cm. cm. cm./sec. Pi 1 b 1 09/29/92• 16.11:00 :...:..:..,v0 1..•5.:,:..A,.. - '........,.. 3.0 :,M.�.a.:,:.,n.v.:.....,,...:...Start,._M 09/30/92 15:51:00 85200 1.8 2.8 2.35E-06 Piia 2 10/01/92 15:40:00 0 1.6 3.0 Start 10/02/92 07:55.00 58500 1.7 2.9 1.71 E-06 Average:[__2.03E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID w. No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. Pi 1 b 1 09/29/92 16.11:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 09/30/92 15:49:00 85080 4.0 1.0 2.35E-05 P11 b 2 10/01/92 08:11:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 10/02/92 07:59:00 85680 3.9 1.1 2.22E-05 a = upper b = lower Average: 2.28E-05 Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 5 of 6 Town of Wappingers Castle Point Landfill Closure Study Permeability Test Results Permeability of Soil at Selected locations m:::. y. ::nv,.....'..�,....}:n.:n::...�::•:5:}::::i:.tw,y.•.}:...n.:..q..;.;yy:.w.Y•:Y.?;.n}:.;,v: {.4+:•:: r.. s:Y :n \:ztivn.rc.:�...'{\v.w:o- .i{4Y:}+AiY+fi 4, n :.vx ..•.x:r: :.. :i•{.:{<n;{.;{. ..r :v u:i......:y , ,.:. kno,?d< '� 3:k{+:x +.r:ixv..v.... .,a:vn, v. . : ro'h•. aw :3{ ':R:.:::. '� i fi.:., :i7 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No: Date ::..:.. real sec. cm, cm. cm./sec. P12a 1 ........:............:.....................................................:.....:. 09/. 29 92 16:12:00 0 1.0 3.0 Start Start 09/30/92 15:51:00 85140 2.2 1.8 1.41E-05 P12a 2 10/01/92 .15:43:00 0 1.0 3.0 Start 2.0 3.0 10/02/92 07:57:00 584401 1.7 2.3 1.28E-05 Average: 1.357705 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real . sec. cm• cm. cm./sec. P12b 1 09/29/92 16:12:00 0 2.0 3.fl Start 09/30/92 09/30/92 08:04:00 57120 5.0 0.0 5.25E-05 P1 2b 2 09/30/92 15:47:00 0 2.0 3.0 Start 08:13.00 1 86460 110/01/92, 07:57:00 08:13:00 59160 5.0 0.0 5,07E-05 Average:1 5.16E-05 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID v ^P13a No. , ..:09/29/92 Date real sec. cm. cm. cm. /sec. < _......w Start P13b 1 . ..................... 09/29/92 x 16:13:00 0 ti . _,...,,1.3 3.0"......, 09/30/92 15:50:00 85020 1.6 2.7 3.53E-06 P13a 2 10/01/92 15:44:00 0 1.3 3.0 Start 10/01/92 08:13.00 1 86460 10/02/92 07:57:00 58380 1.6 2.7 5.14E-06 Average: 4.33E-06 Cylinder Test Elapsed Time Depth to Water Depth of Water Hydraulic Conductivity ID No. Date real sec. cm. cm. cm./sec. P13b 1 . ..................... 09/29/92 16.13:00 0 1.3 3.0 Start 09/30/92 08:04:00 57060 4.3 0.0 5.26E-05 P13b 2 09/30/92 08:12:00 0 1.3 3.0 Start 10/01/92 08:13.00 1 86460 4.3 1 0.0 3.47E-05 a = upper b = Iower Average: 4.36E-05 Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. - Page 6 of 6 Chazen Environmental. Services, Inc. HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING PROTOCOL 1) A sample location is selected, representative of the soils to be tested. 2) Vegetation and soil materials are carefully excavated to expose the undisturbed soil layer to be tested. 3) A thin walled metal cylinder, approximately 4 cm. in diameter and 15 cm long, is pushed into the soil to a depth of 10 cm. 4a) If the permeability testing is to take place in the field, bentonite is placed around the outside of the metal cylinder, at the interface of the soil surface, to form a water tight seal (see field setup diagram) 4b) If field testing is not desired, the sample cylinder is carefully excavated and brought back to the Chazen facilities for testing. The bottom of the cylinder is wrapped with filter material to prevent soil loss during the test. The wrapped cylinder is then placed on a gravel bed to allow water to exit through the filter material (see office setup diagram). 5) The cylinder containing the sample to be tested is filled with water and allowed to stabilize for a period of time sufficient to completely saturate the soil within the cylinder. Additional water is added as needed to replace the water adsorbed by the soil. 6) After soil saturation is achieved, the water level within the cylinder is adjusted so that the depth of water is about 3 cm. above the soil level. The date, time, and depth of water is then recorded. 7) An evaporation monitoring cylinder, similar in size and material to the sample cylinder, is set up in the vicinity of the sample being tested and filled to a level approximating the water level in the sample cylinder. This water level is recorded along with the sample information. 8) Periodically, the sample cylinder and the evaporation cylinder are checked and the date, time, and water level in each cylinder is recorded. The Chazen Companies Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Protocol Page 1 of Z 9) Permeability, "K", in cm/sec, is calculated, based on the change in water level over time, according to the following equation: K = ((Ho - HI/t) - (( Eo - El)/t) Where: 1-4 = Depth of water in test cylinder (cm) at the start of the test period. H, = Depth of water in test cylinder (cm) at the end of the test period. Ea = Depth of water in evaporation cylinder (cm) at the start of the test period. 'E, = Depth of water in evaporation cylinder (cm) at the end of the test period. t. = Time in seconds between the start and end of the test. FIELD SETUP OFFICE SETUP irface se Cloth Grovel E E, Solid Bottom 00 0 $goo .. opolg00 RjopOOoa The Chazen Companies Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Protocol Fuge 2 o%o .. MEM® MODIFIED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING PROTOCOL ICastle Point Landfill CIosure Study 10/07/92 The existing characteristics of the very dense, gravelly in-place cover material at the Castle Point Landfill resulted in performing a modified test procedure. The dense soils did not permit the insertion of test cylinders for field permeability testing and inhibited the standard method of acquiring materials for in office testing. The procedure for the j collection of soils for permeability testing was modified in the following manner. • Vegetation and soil materials were carefully excavated to expose the undisturbed soil layer. • A hole was excavated to a depth of 24 inches. • Soils were excavated from. the side walls of the hole and packed into the test cylinders in a manner which was most consistent and representative of the in. -place materials. • The bottom of each cylinder was wrapped with filter material in the field to prevent soil loss during transport. The cylinders of soils to be tested were transported to the office and permeability testing was conducted according to the standard protocol for hydraulic conductivity testing. The Chaxen ComDanics Hydraulic coarlucti ily TeslingYrowcol: Modification APPENDIX B Chazen Environmental Services Inc. APPENDIX B CASTLE POINT LANDFILL MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE Frequency: Annually, --April of each year for a five year period Wells to be sampled: PMW-3, PMW-4a, PMWA PMW 7 and PMW--4b for combustible gasses only Parameters to be analyzed for: Laboratory: Iron, Manganese Field: pH, Conductivity, turbidity, combustible gasses - Chazen Environmental Services, Inc. SAMPLING PROTOCOL FOR WELLS WITH STATIC WATER LEVELS LESS THAN 30 FEET 1) Determine static water level with a water level indicated and record depth to water. Record reference point, i.e., casing, ground, etc. 2) Determine depth to bottom by lowering water level indicator to bottom. Record reference point. 3) Measure and record height of casing. 4) A clean sheet of plastic should be placed around the well to be sampled so that there is a clean surface on which to place sampling equipment. 6) Set up peristaltic pump. 6) Attach teflon tubing (designated for that boring) and start purging, using peristaltic pump. If boring is air rotary type (diameter 6-8 inches), use a submersible pump to purge. Pump should be cleaned before use. 7) Purge three volumes of the well as determined by diameter of the well and the difference between the static water level and the depth to bottom. Use the purging procedure appropriate for that well. 8) After purging, determine and record the static water level. Allow well to recover to 90% or greater of original water column depth. If recovery is proceeding slowly, go on to another well. The well must be allowed to recover before sampling, but the maximum allowable elapsed time between purging and sampling can not exceed 7 days. 9) Once the well has recovered, begin sampling from the bottom 1/3 of the water. column. Record sample depth. Based on analyses to be performed, collect a sample in the properly preserved bottle, equal to 1/3 of the total required sample volume. Cap bottles securely. For volatile samples, fill 2 VOAS, making sure that there are no air bubbles present. If air bubbles are present, refill until they disappear. If well shows significant drawdown then the VOAS should be taken first. The Chazen Com anies Sampling Protocol forllrells with Sialic Walcr Leads Less Than 30 Fee! Page I of 2 10) After collecting samples in bottles, collect in a clean bottle 1/3 of the bottle's total volume to be used later for taking field measurements. 11) Repeat steps 8 and 9 for the middle 1/3 and the upper 1/3 of the column. Record sample depths. 12) Determine and record the static water level after sampling. 13) Determine and record the pH, specific conductivity, and temperature of the sample taken for field measurements. 14) Upon completion of the sampling, place all tubing into a large plastic bag labeled for that particular well. 15) Pack and Iabel all samples for analysis by an outside Iaboratory. The bottle should be labeled with the site location, well I.D., date, time, sampler's I.D. i' and parameters. The Chazen Companies ^' Sampling Proloeol jorWells with Slalic Water Levels Less Than 30 Feet rage 2 of APPENDIX C Chazen Environmental Services, Me. v, a Z bra"•tQ_n:,i;•idi��Frg� f 81a �'vj� enr- +: �• 3 s ,� V"S 'i't r'. `�'VtvW'�`}4 _ r - - '` f .41 -S' SOIL ` SOIL & MATERIAL TESTING, INC. SI rT 57 SOUTH MAIN STREET • CAE'rLGTCN N,Y, 12033 S.M.T. Job No. 74877 • TELEPHONES [5191 732.7205 CASTLETON OFFICE LABORATORY C' ,APACTION REPORT Fest Date 9/26/86 [607) 722-1592 BINGHAMTON Job Name and Location Milton Chazen Associates Architect or Engineer Contractor A. Description of Soil: Silty Clay Unified AASHo Material Mark S-1 Classification _ CL—ML Classification Source of Material Picked p—a€€lees9/8/86 Natural Water Content % Natural Dry Density PCF Specific Gravity Liquid Limit 24 % Plastic Limit 19 i'o Plasticity Index 5 B. Test Procedure Used: ASTM D698 (standard) C. Test Results: Maximum Dry Density 116.3 PGF optimum Water Content 15.5 % D. Falling Head Permeability Test result 1.2X10-6 CM/SEC @ 90% Compaction E. 99.5% Passing #200 sieve by wash 120 ji g 882y1f 115 v J 110 a �I C 14 - Excavated hole Depth of cover: >24.0 inches, 2 C 18 - Excavated hole Depth of cover: 14.E inches. Debris revealed at 14.E in.:.11etal pipe, plastic scraps and plastic cap. Chuzen En virimmontul Survives, Inc �. �-' µti 1f$ � ]F. _ y •, �y, 'M 9a.f'�q�i A _ n�4�4 r F, r ,y��c.W.• 1l .:y 3 � �y r . • ! . j�.` ri'�, �3'�! h� /. '-`r W' ,�y-�.�•�'. •Twp' ♦�C� ��.:A;4- Al T } ' IN IP �a� I 5 i KU,,� • �' �r qk r410* e R if lop. ` .. Ilei ^^..w1Y �'a. ...