Loading...
Robinson Lane Recreation WaterWater Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sam pie Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, inc. 1610 Route 376 WaDDinaers Falls. New York 12590 Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting Monthrfear ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 July 2011 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date Amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals. Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs. per Used Lbs. 24 Hrs. Qts. Free Chlorine Residual pH mg/1 1 0.07 0.8 2 0.23 0.7 3 0.21 _ 0.8 4 _ 0.20 1.0 5 0.10 1.0 6 0.13 1.0 7 0.17 2 1.0 8 0.071 1.0 9 0.56 0.8 10 0.29 1.2 11 0.25 1.1 12 0.34 1.1 13 - 0.25 2 1.0 14 0.29 2 1.0 15 0.10 0.7 16 0.32 1.0 17 0.71 2 1.0 18 0.19 1.2 19 0.33 1.0 20 0.14 1.0 21 1.64 4 1.0 22 2.26 0.8 23 1.76 4 0.7 24 2.05 0.7 25 0.05 0.9 26 0.24 0.5 27 0.70 0.5 28 0.44 1.0 29 0.08 1.0 30 0.14 1.0 31 0.09 0.8 Total 14.40 161 28.3 Avg. 0.46 0.53 0.91 Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Title: Operator County: DUTCHESS Ground 0 o No Population served: 25 Number of required routine sample 1 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: - -- . Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or - high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coff and a repeat Total Cotiform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for'':_' E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coll. ` Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date: 8 it Grade Level: IIA Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity ., (1,2,3)* mg/L NTU 2 No No 2 _ No _ _ No 2 _ No _ _ No Mensroom sink 716111 2 _ No _ _ No 1.0 _ _ _ 17 Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _Yes` No _Yes_ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _Yes_ No _ Yes_ No Yes No Yes No *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS Park opened 4113111 first sample failed total coliform ok for e-coli followed with four samples all were good for total coliform and a-coli bacteria = z m 0 d m 0 m z h n m z Q' c OD m A r� ) m m rri S F rn m Y Z it 1h V z �_ LA {c` f z r � � bpm a W 0 V m a m Oi5 '4 m m M a V-1 O w O �' a ` • r mQ O m O �°a c > � frj d ` m c� r tz X 0 m X o n T mw rn 1syyr 9 @ T ;C myS p �^ 4 � W CO ' woo s a A m 0 Q p Z mTrA m C O n O � W . `tel Z > m r- -< O I I Ln 1 E- o n m -T z 5; m N N -4 iii Y �..� V a n� m s �r.SoJ z z a m a� ...,j Y •--� H � N pay -L1 �] z M 9 m -nr ►--1 � f --t � � ry m z Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Wanninnprs Falls Naw Ynrk 19.r;Q l Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal . y Reporting Month[Year ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 June 2011 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date Amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals, Per Day _ CHLORINATION_ Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs, per Used Lbs. 24 Hrs. qts. Free Chlorine Residual pH mgll 1 0.32 1.0 2 0.39 2 1.0 3 0.35 1.0 4 0.62 2 0.7 5 0.44 0.7 6 - 0.39 1.0 7 0.37 �. 1.0 8 0.50 2 1.0 9 0.26 0.8 10 1.04 1.2 11 0.40 2 1.0 12 _ 0.33 _ 1.0 13 0.33 TT1.0 14 0.27 1.0 15 0.24 1.0 16 0.21 2 1.2 17 1.27 2 1.0 18 0.81 2 1:0 19 0.36 0.8 20 0.23 - 0.8 21 0.17 2 0.7 22 0.05 0.8 23 0.05 0.5 24 0.20 0.9 25 0.23 _ 2 0.8 26 0.38 0.8 27 0.28 0.9 28 0.32 - 0.8 29 0.15 1.2 30 0.39 1.0 31 Total 11.35 18 27.6 Avg. 0.37 0.60 0.88 Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Title: Operator County: DUTCHESS roup _ l _ No No No Population served: 25 Number of required routine samplE Number of actual routine samples Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. ;j Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason (s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5%u positive total coliform samples for. systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. ' When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E,coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coli. ' Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date:: $ f Grade Level a Cert. No. IIA. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free CI- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity mg/L NTU 2 _ _ No _ J No 2 No No 2 No _ No Mensroom sink 613111 2 J J No _ No 0.6 _ Yes No Yes No w Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ _Yes_ No _Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No J Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _Yes No Yes_ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes No . _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No *1.= Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS Park opened 4113111 first sample failed total coliform ok for a-coli followed with four samples all were good for total coliform and a-coli bacteria z C 0 z 9 z n r a ai 0 z n 2 z rr n R O m \ 0 I V m Pz r �'L m N m O W 1 ¢;i m co iL6 :o b zo L[ z 2 1 rJ C o r � � 7� n TI m p h7 a r m CD o o m Q td W In En Q o a-1 Z� CSS 0� mo n c (n "` � t FA m x -u9 X x � m rnOq m ro m n ornL� � • ro�=I � � �mv � �in�"'rt Ngo; °W m O s C Q a r O �yZ O w a 31 �Z N Z m m Na ad r �mt�T 0 rill 0 z tT1 Fn w i t= O m Q C 4 C p X7 � _a Z N O C' x d � ,tmia � ® 3 N m �a d z z C 0 z 9 z n r a ai 0 z n Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Warminaers Falls. New York 12590 Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting Month/Year ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 October 2010 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date ,amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals. Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs. per Used Lbs, 24 Hrs. Qts. _ Free Chlorine Residual pH mgll 1 0.72 0.6 2 1.00 2 0.6 3 1.22 2 0.6 4 0.49 2 0.6 5 0.50 0.6 6 0.49 0.6 7 0.71 0.6 8 0.47 0.5 9 0.60 2 0.3 10 0.72 2 0.4 11 0.51 0.3 12 0.51 0.3 13 0,531 2 0.7 14 0.521 0.8 15 0.72 2 0.7 16 0,62 1.0 17 0.60 1.0 18 0.59 0:7 19 0.53 2 0.8 20 0.44 0.7 21 0.56 2 0.7 22 0.89 4 0.6 23 1.00 0.6 24 0.791 2 0.4 25 0.51 0.4 26 0,60 0.5 27 0.47 6 0.5 28 4.78 0.4 29 1.06 0.0 30 0.96 0.4 31 0.761 1 0.4 Total 24.871 30 17.3 Avg. 0.80 1 1.00 0.55 Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc, Title: Operator County: DUTCHESS round No No 0 Population served: 25 Number of required routine sample 1 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reasen(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check tear. LL� Tw or more"r��iiWse systems toll cling fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) pe month. N O V 1'5 2010 M e ° tiv t I lifo//r��m psam ies f�o*r systems col cti g e ole efikiiie 'A hiturb) per onth, TQ W N CLERK When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coli. * Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month. following a repeat sample collection. Date: / ID Grade Level: IIA Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)* mg/L NTU Sink -Kitchen 10/13/10 11 Yes No Yes No 0.7 . Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _Yes_ No _Yes_ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No ` Yes _ No Yes No Yes No TYes� No Yes, No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No JYes_ No Yes No _Yes_ No ^Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS n s m n 7 P m z c CD m [i1 coA 4 a v o i z ri z n A Q Ci n n m 7d a m s o m x r C" m mrn h Q H rY P9O o a 2 r Qo r o C7 n c C C� CC� R1 m m �'i r ¢ C7 r m f T� x p k M ��� CJ m b 4 � Z ppKI g m O �d� m n Q�Vo 9!< .woo Wer a m c Z CDa o y ; a -n r: `"'z o - to > i o o n D n ? D Z C m vw o m w N a a W m J m _ m �••� > Li x . t n p 0 Ire O C d <� D � � —� C] Z In €� TO h-+ J -IV r c y 3 o r� z �o Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Wanninners Falls. New York "12590 Name of Public Water System Program Code _ Federal Reporting MenthlYear ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 April 2011 Location: TOWN OF WAPPING ER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date Amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals. Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs, per Used Lbs, 24 Hrs. Qts. Free Chlorine Residual mg/l pH 2 3 55 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 10.50 2 0.8 14 0.11 _ 2 1.0 15 0.21 1.0 16 1.18 2 1.0 17 0.07 1.3 18 0.17 2 1.4 19 0.20 1.2 20 0.19 1.2 21 0.20 1.4 22 0.14 1.4 23 0.02 1.4 24 0.04 0.4 25 0.21 2 0.5 26 0.22 1.5 27 0.26 1.2 28 0.17 2 1.5 29 0.26 1.2 30 0.61 1.2 31 Total 14.76 12 20.6 Avg. 0.48 0.40 0.90 County: DUTCHESS roun - No No _ O Population served: 25 Number of required routine samp$f 1 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeal or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for .. systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat, - or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coli. 'Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month fol;owing a repeat sample collection. Reported by: CRMO Pollution Control, Inc. Date: /b 11 Grade Level: IIA Title: Operator Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)* mg1L NTU Sink-Kitchen 4112111 71 Yes No 0.8 . Bathroom sink 4114111 No No 1.0 . Kitchen sink 4114111 No No 1.0 . Outside hose bib 4114111 No u No 0.8 Mensroom sink 4114111 No No 1.4 . Yes No Yes No _Yes_ No _Yes_ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes No Yesu No _Yes_ No Yes No Yes No _Yes No _Yes_ No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS Park opened 4113111 first sample failed total coliform ok for e-coli followed with four samples all were good for total coliform and a-coli bacteria r.0m mnx mr'O pNj 0 H woo Q �y W C m z C i m z C npz 0 `° 0 m x zT W A C -n O � m �W n n N W N 0 m 1 S y r.a 0 z m n t m R n b 8 m 22 �m O � A n r W C m z C i m z C npz 0 `° 0 m x zT W A C -n O � m �W n n N W N 0 m 1 S y r.a 0 v 31 t m b 8 m 22 �m O n r Q m Ovi m n 0 r m roo�" n m .a a m Z b m ro �' n � m d O o m - Z in - c O r. ro -n Mo C fl o n m m �, a� m v m m O E I W C m z C i m z C npz 0 `° 0 m x zT W A C -n O � m �W n n N W N 0 m 1 S y r.a 0 m CA m q cn CD io i corp 0o 3 pm 0 m l.rs Z A a N Lr _u �M zm d r Cl) � C m m 0 m 3 c m 6� Z yo r v n1 Q H O m r-- 0 m m z r m n o c 93t i m n r � O V+ Z � r t a Lr _u �M zm d r Cl) � C m m 0 m 3 c m 6� Z ,,. r v t a n 0 o ^0 rn m0 0 E: O n 0 r p r �m� m o r-33 n m a m Z py < V m C O r > TT O � g O o a C7 A m --I �u m m Lr _u �M zm d r Cl) � C m m 0 m 3 c m 6� Z I■ m m '-1 9 �c T ro n i OD m 03 m O i T 0 9 N rV V a 0 A, n > Q n (1 m o z 0 A �y rn 0 „ W S A q m � 4 ZZ o��cr n N p O LO o ~ ■ I O N cwp N (D it b � n � CNn rn w a ro 0 in S m O N O r mn Z r p n n r p r rn q � i n�Qn m m m z M m G m n ..� C 4 p O m d Z O a 11 � � 9 � m m a mm b A m C) Xl zm o r C ,z OC L z to m -n O F -; � m A 3� m 0 Qz z C_ o z 0 uj rn 0 „ W z A q m � 4 ZZ o��cr n N p O LO o ~ ■ I O N cwp N (D � n � CNn rn w a ro 0 ` 2 0-. Z c�a r., CZ F. n 0 S a 0 z m � Q� 0 m n m a Do H v y y 4� m m m b x 0 z m W Z �n h Y n C1 0 cn -i m r > 0 n + z 00 .i O m i C 3 N a < Q m ➢ 0CIO N Z C lb v a m v m-] Ln 0 o m rl m r3 t 3 � qh 0 i s En a (7 m 7� A o CO �° n . dm v �� > r m m yy � c: m m m �o X o N w. �T� m% G • m N � Z y f/113 -u m 3LNrn� 44 p rn V i -< V3 Woo O o m Z RL T m ED C ccnn CO r 3 0- � Om r Lq �a >,.� �4 C) n m �Z w z E/N j- ern�'{{ wIJ n{ r m m �v N Y fi m !i .b ti Z m m �r z >to � f1l 4t a a o W r� m 3 C 1=70 O Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 WaDDinaers Falls. New York 12590 Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting Month[Year ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 September 2010 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? CHLORINATION Amountof Gaseous Liquid Treated Chlorine Hypo- Free Water Weight of Used chlorite Chlorine I Date 1,000 Gals. Cylinder Lbs. per Used Residual pH Per Day Lbs. 24 Hrs. Qts. mgll 1 0.74 2 0.7 2 1.13 �- - 0.7 3 0.79 0.7 4 0.55 2 0.6 5 0.59 0.6 6 0.63 2 0.3 70.69 0.5 8 .0.56 0.5 9 0.71 2 0.5 10 0.44 0.5 11 1.04 2 0.5 121 0.5 13 0,12 0.5 14 0.59 2 0.5 151 0.46 - 0.5 - _... 160.52 2 0.5 rY 17 0.53 0.4 _9 8 _ 0.4 _ 19 3.054 20 -- 0.55 _ 2 0.4 21 0.60 0.4 22 0.53 , 0.4 23 0,70 2 0.4 24 0.96' 2 0.4 25 1.27 I 2 0.4 26 0,84 1 0.4 _27 0.57 2 0.2 -281-- 0.63 0.6 291 1.05 2 0.6 30 31 I Totall 21.15 1 30 13.6 -Avg. l- 0.68 1.001 0.39 Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Title: Operator County: DUTCHESS Ground No No Population served: 25 Number of required routine samplf 9 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MGL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason (s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coll. "Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date: /b y IIU Grade Level: IIA Cert. No. 12947 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? CHLORINATION Amountof Gaseous Liquid Treated Chlorine Hypo- Free Water Weight of Used chlorite Chlorine I Date 1,000 Gals. Cylinder Lbs. per Used Residual pH Per Day Lbs. 24 Hrs. Qts. mgll 1 0.74 2 0.7 2 1.13 �- - 0.7 3 0.79 0.7 4 0.55 2 0.6 5 0.59 0.6 6 0.63 2 0.3 70.69 0.5 8 .0.56 0.5 9 0.71 2 0.5 10 0.44 0.5 11 1.04 2 0.5 121 0.5 13 0,12 0.5 14 0.59 2 0.5 151 0.46 - 0.5 - _... 160.52 2 0.5 rY 17 0.53 0.4 _9 8 _ 0.4 _ 19 3.054 20 -- 0.55 _ 2 0.4 21 0.60 0.4 22 0.53 , 0.4 23 0,70 2 0.4 24 0.96' 2 0.4 25 1.27 I 2 0.4 26 0,84 1 0.4 _27 0.57 2 0.2 -281-- 0.63 0.6 291 1.05 2 0.6 30 31 I Totall 21.15 1 30 13.6 -Avg. l- 0.68 1.001 0.39 Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Title: Operator County: DUTCHESS Ground No No Population served: 25 Number of required routine samplf 9 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MGL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason (s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coll. "Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date: /b y IIU Grade Level: IIA Cert. No. 12947 Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Title: Operator County: DUTCHESS Ground No No Population served: 25 Number of required routine samplf 9 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MGL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason (s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coll. "Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date: /b y IIU Grade Level: IIA Cert. No. 12947 Sampling Location Sink -Kitchen ©ate of Sample 9120110 "1 = Routine sample Distribution System Analytical Results Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)* mg/L NTU '1 Yes ^ No _ Yes _ No 0.4 Yes No �Yes� No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No _Yes No _Yes No Yes No Yes No . Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _ Yes J No Yes _ No _ _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes J No Yes No Yes No _ Yes J No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS I N ao to o co O m aao r Nn mr-�i 3wpm �0) C � � z � N --i D In H -�, Q) n (n xM o m o n z� -n m m 0 m rrnn m ;u S � c Om yam Qo O r n 0 n r C no m M ti d - C-' n Qm �z m m t O o m mOm C o g Q n n m r� Fn4 �m wnO x Z m m Z TT_C 0 o M % Z i m v w rn m A g [ o n Q�m� r' o� w Z (D r o D N W Q � I T'1 i� 0 Q) n (n xM o O� z� -n m m 0 L�1 m ;u c Qo m Z TT_C 0 o M % Z i m v w rn m A g [ o n Q�m� r' o� w Z (D r o D N W Q � I T'1 i� 0 Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Waooinaers Falls. New York 12590 Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting Month/Year ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 August 2010 Location; TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date Amount of Treated Water 3,000 Gals. Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs, per Used Lbs. 24 Hrs, Qts, mm Free Chlorine Residual pH mgll 1 2.75 8 0.4 2 0.86 0.4 3 0.61 _ 0.4 4 0.50 2 0.4 5 1.00^ 0.4 6 0.43 2 0.3 7 0.43 2 0.3 s. 0.80 0.3 9 0.63 0.2 10 0.51 0.2 11 0.52 2 0.3 12 0.59 0.8 13 0.57 0.8 14 0.55 0.8 15 1.51 2 0.7 16 0.43 2 0.6 17 0.42 0.8 T 180.39 0.8 19 0.58 0.7 20 0.3 0.52 2 0.2 _21 22 0.52 0.2 23 0.61 _ 2 0.5 24 0.59 0.5 25 0,79 2 0.5 26 0.53 2 0.4 27 0.85 0.4 28 1.74 0.4 291.32 4 0.4 30 _ H9 0.4 31 0.41 1 2 0.4 Totall 22.951 1 1 34 14.2 Avg, 1 0.741 1 1.071 1 0.49 Reported by: CAMO Pal tion Con ro , n , jj�/J(� Title: Operato ����Lf lJ LSD SEP 13 2010 i TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN CLERK County: DUTCHESS roun No No No Population served: 25 Number of required routine sample ) Number of actual routine samples Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli If there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes; check reasons) below: T Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sampie is positive for E.celI and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E,coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coli. * Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date: L Grade Level: IIA ��__ _ Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)* mg1L NTU Sink -Kitchen 8116110 01 Yes No Yes No 0.6 . _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No �Yes� No TYes_ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No , _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No �Yes� No �Yes� No Yes No Yes No _Yes_ No _Yes_ No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ e _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No . *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS The park at Robinson lane closed 11/31/09 T p m f7 �o n r m y m +n c m °smo r O m r V } _ r Z D A 9 3 �y 77 D Zai n j Ln -� Q o ZZrn m (meq m F frfm i C) o } d 0m V7 o r a M X H r r O D m X m 4 � f • 1 m 4� 4 lm _� zN to cn CD > -�! a�w o $ a o Ob O �ED m� O O r m m Q O � rn -n a Z Z a mp >� Z m m >� 171 to d%> m m a m �p ❑ 0 O CZ m C4 m > r �k c z x y d o:I-_- I-_-[ C: z c� a m m � Q co � N Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Waoninoers Falls. New York 12590 Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting MonthtYear ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 July 2010 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date Amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals, Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs. per Used Lbs. 24 Hrs. Qts.. Free Chlorine Residual pN mgll 1 7.75 12 0.7 2 4.27 4 0.7 3 6.05 4 0.5 4 6.35 0.2 5 2.82 0.5 6 3.67 2 0.5 7 4.37 0.6 8 4.77 10 0.1 9 5.65 $ 2.0 10 7.24 12 1.8 11 8.34 12 1.8 12 8.52 8 1.2 13 7.11 10 1.5 14' 0..67 2 1.0 15 - -4.96 6 0.7 16 72.64 4 1.2 17 1.07 2 1.2 18 ` 0.56 2 1.0 19 0.33 0.9 20 0.47 0.9 21 0.26 0.8 22 0.69 0.6 23 0.35 2 0.5 241 0.30 1 0.5 25 0.31 0.5 26 0.24 2 0.7 27 1.21 2 0.6 28 3.11 4 . 0.6 29 _ 1.09 8 0.4' 30 1.71 4 0.4 31 4.27 4 0.3 Totall 101.151 1 1241 24.9 Avg. 3.26 -.._ . ,. Reported by: CAM0 Pollut t l ��ICD Title: OAer for AUG 1 2030 TOWN OF WAPPING ER TOWN CLERK County: DUTCHESS round No 0 Population served: 25 Number of required routine sample 1 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to. analyze for E.coli it there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: . Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.cwii and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coli. Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Dated a w Grade Level: IIA �.. 1 Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)* mg/L NTU Sink -Kitchen 7113110 '1 Yes No Yes No 0.9 , Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No _ Yes ^ No Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No J Yes _ No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No , Yes _ No Yes ` No _ Yes _ No , Yes _ No _ Yes ; No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No u Yes _ No _ Yes _ No . Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS The park at Robinson lane closed 11/31/09 x z m n m co Ln `A m � L r z a t7 C S a n coo D I.m C r m r�7 !-� fz7 Q .'d 0 nm m o rri v, m vow m ^ o .X D m w u .� 4 u • m m Z m 160 �] NJ S7 ;2 owom r ODr0 rn y acw O 0 mom O + G 0 u rn 11 �+ m d n d COD p i1 z m � > r•w 7 A �--� - a ;30C �! r O f�Aji-- f ' m ( �a Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Waooincrers Falls. New York 12590 Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting MonthlYear ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 June 2010 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date Amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals, Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs, per Used Lbs, 24 Hrs. Qts. Free Chlorine Residual PH mgh 1 0.55 2 0.7 2 0.45 0.7 3 0.60 - 0.7 4 0.53 2 0.8 5. 0.68 2 0.7 6 0.7103 7 0.65 _ 0.8 8 0.56 0.8 9 0.34 4 0.8 10 0.43 0.8 11 0.57 _ 0.8 12 _ 0.60 0.8 13 0.60 0.8 -- 14 0,33 0.8 15 0.55 0.7 16 0.43 2 0.7 17 0.67 0.7 181 1.45 4 0.7 19 0.96 0.7 20 0.80 0.7 21 0.39 0.7 22 1.55 2 0.7 23 - 3.92 4 0.7 24 4.03 4 0.7 _ 25 1.31 _ 2 0.7 26 4.32 2 0.7 27 _ 7.35 8 0.4 28 7.81 - 81 0.9 29 6.05 6 0.9 30 6.22 10 0.7 31 Total 55.4162 22.0 Arg. 2.30 2.07 0.70 Rep fted ft�� ti ol, Inc Titl . Operator JUL 14 2010 TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN CLERK County. DUTCHESS roun 0 No No Population served: 25 Number of required routine sample Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeal or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? N0. If yes, check reason(s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Collform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coli. * Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date: l' 1.2 10 Grade Level: IIA Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Free Cl- Raw Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform F.coli Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)* mg/L NTU Sink -Kitchen 617110 11 _ Yes _ No Yes J No 0.7 . Yes No _Yes_ No _Yes_ No _Yes No _ Yes J No Yes _ No Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes J No Yes No _ Yes _ No J Yes No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No u Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No _Yes_ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes , No Yes T No _ Yes _ No _Yes_ No Yes^ No Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS The park at Robinson lane closed 11/31/09 I■ n i OD N U \ m p x \ ti Q mr-00 W � W m Ul z L w z L mm ) ry r O H n T n m m o c 0 v o�m 4 { m 13 N42 T m V o n rn rn n m CO o R"I i m o w z '< 9 302 ' m T m F� p4)r C `o aLiN f O m Zco "' c 0 cNi, W y u "T1 m o � a� D O m � I rn z m "• Z � � n c7 + _co Q O C m Li � o C:Z3 I� h� Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 WanninaPrs Falls NPw Ynrk 12N)PO Name of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting Month/Year ROBINSON LANE _ 100 1330219 - -� May 2010 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system?. Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Date Amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals. Per Day CHLORINATION..____ Gaseous Liquid _ Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs. per Used Lbs, 24 Hrs. Qts. Free Chlorine Residual pH mg/1 1 0.19 0.8 2 0.77 0.6 3 0.362 _. 0.6 _ 4 � 0.46 .- - �� 0.7 5 0.41 --- 0.7 6 0.51 T _ 0.8 71 0.42 2 0.8 8 0.38 __... 2 0.8 9 0.58 _ 0.8 10 0.44 1.5 11 0.44 0.8 12 0.17 0.7 13 0.53 2 0.8 14 0.54 - 0.7 15 0.53 2 0.7 16 0.90 _ - 0.7 17 0.420.7 18 0.21 _ 0.8 19 0.34 201 0.370.8 - 21 _ 0.53 2 0.6 22 0.56 0.9 23 0.89 0.8 24 0.36 2 0.8 25 0.56 0.8 26 0.460.8 _0.39 27 28 - 0.77.1 1 0.7 - 29 0.29 _ 2 0.8 30 0.48 D.8 31 0.401 __ 0.6 j Total 14.661 1 18 23.91 1 Avg. 1 0.491 1 0.52 0.79 Reported by: CAMo ilollutir��r� Title: Opera or JUN 0 g 2010 TOWN OF WAPPINGFR TOWN CLERK County: DUTCHESS Ground _------------ --� No No Population served: 25 Number of required routine sample 1 Number or actual routine samples 1 Does a MBAR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewerthan required. Failure to analyze for E,coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 44 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month, When a. positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E,coll. * Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Date: 6111110 Grade Level: IIA �Q Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)" mg/L NTU Sink -Kitchen 5/17/10 01 _ Yes _ No Yes _ No 0.7 _ Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes ` No _ Yes _ No _Yes_ No _ Yes_ No _Yes_ No Yes_ No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No ` Yes _ No Yes ^ No _ Yes No J Yes _ No _ Yes ` No _Yes _ No Yes _ No �YesJ No _Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No . Yes ` No Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes No _Yes No _ Yes _ No ` Yes _ No Yes No _ Yes _ No *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS The park at Robinson lane closed 11/31/09 I m ,Y1 I 1 ty 1 in II 1 '\tel 'rspr � Ill y I T, to 33 m 0 o 0 r r r 0 � m rn m z m m � o m,o z m � C 0 A � rn o g n m m r �. -4 1 0 7 � O fTi S+3 Ncoo er Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Name of Public Water System Program Cod ROBINSON LANE 100 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface; is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 - _...__-..._----- - Code Federal Reporting MonthlYear Date Amount of Treated Water 1,000 Gals. Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- weight of Used chlorite Cylinder Lbs, per Used Lbs. 24 Hrs. Qts. Free Chlorine Residual pH mg/I 2 - 3 - - - -4 - - 5 - 6 7 _ 8 0.09 I 4 0.5 - 9 0.16 0.3 10 0.24 0.5 11 0.21 0.5 12 0.24 2 0.5 13 0.14 0.7 14 ` 0.15 0.6 15 0.31 0-7 - 16 0.31 0.7 _17 0.92 2 0.7 - 18 19 --.2D 0.29 - - 0.8 0.31 2 0.8 21 0.43 _. 0.8 22 0.41 _ 2 0.6 ` 23 1.23 0.7 24 - 0.:30 4 W-4 0.6 25 0.25 0.6 26 0.17 - 0.7 27 0,70 0.7 28 0.450.7- 29 ---- 0.7 _ 30 _ _ 0.73 2 0.7 31 Total 8.04 18 14.1 Avg. _ 0.36 0.64 0.62 Reported by: CAMO Po lution "� Title: Operat u V LTJ MAY 1.0 2010 TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN CLERK 1330219 County: DUTCHESS Groun No ----.. Noy Population served: 25 Number of required routine sampic 1 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E. coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason (s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample Is positive for E,coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Cciiform sample is positive and also is positive for E,coii. * Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month follewfng a repeat sample collection. 2010 Date: ` 7 hc.> Grade Level: IIA ---,�.� Cert. No. 12947 Robinson Lane park opened 418110 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coii Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2>3)* mg/L NTU Mens Room 4/13110 '1 Yes ` No _ Yes _ No. 0.7 . Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No . Yes _ No _ Yes No Yes No _ Yes ^ No _ Yes No _ Yes ^ No , _Yes_ No Yes No _Yes No Yes_ No Yes _ No _ Yes No _ Yes— No _ Yes _ No _ Yes No -_ Yes, _ No Yes No Yes No _Yes No —Yes_ No Yes _ No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes No Yes No Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes ` No _ Yes ^ No *1 = Routine sample 2 Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS Robinson Lane park opened 418110 Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sample Results Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Jame of Public Water System Program Code Federal Reporting MonthtYear ROBINSON LANE 100 1330219 July 2001 Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? r Amount of Treated Water Date 1,000 Gals. Per Day CHLORINATION Gaseous Liquid Chlorine Hypo- Weight of Used chiodte Cylinder Lbs. per Used Lbs, 24 Hrs. Qts. Free Chlor ne Residual pH mg)l 1 0.23 1.0 2 0.19 1.0 3 0.13 0.5 4 0.23 0.5 5 0.46 0.4 6 0.25 2 0.4 7 0.13 _ _ 0.3 8 0.28 0.3 9 0.16 1'0 10 0.18 1.0 11 0.20 2 1.0 12 0.29 1.0 13 0.37 1.0 14 0.18 2 0.8 15 0.90 0.8 16 0.34 0.8 17 0.13 2 0.8 18 0.24 0.8 19 0.64 4. 0.8 20 0.36 2 0.5 21 0.32 2 0.4 22 0.32 0.5 23 0.21 2 0.5 24 0.30 0.7 250.72 2 1,0 26 - 0.88 _ _ 4 1.0 27---0,90 1.0 W 28 .0.11 2 1.0 29 O.o$ - 1.0 30 0.08 1.0 31 1 0.14 1.0 Totall 9.951 1 26 23.8 Avg, D.36 1.09 0,84 _ County: DUTCHESS Ground No fo 0 Population served; 255 Number of required routine sample 1 Number of actual routine samples . 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Actual number of samples fewer than required. Failure to analyze for E.coll if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems coliecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hlturb) per month. When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E,coll and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coll, * Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Date: Grade Level: IIA Title: Operator Celt. No, 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free Cl- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)' mg/L NTU Sink 7114/08 11 Yes _ No _ Yes _ No 0.8 _ Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes No _ Yes No _ Yes No ^ . Yes ^ No ` Yes _ No _ Yes R No _ Yes _ No _ Yes No Yes , No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes. No _ Yes J No _ Yes No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No Yes No _ Yes R No _ Yes _ No _Yes ^No Yes ^No Yes _ No Yes _ No _ Yes No _ Yes _ No _ _ Yes No _ Yes No Yes_ No _Yes_ No *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 - Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS S n z rn n 0� O �m m n p O m CD dw o O c mj r J K 1y m m r T 0 b On r - N O LJ co Z r n C m rt� rn o rn w v �n qG m can to OD C) A"* F' m o =� o m �� 0 o X ' c m rn m ro x � y D z m h q --� _ T 0 C- o m m M Cil V 3 ) RECEIVE), MemoTOWN CLERK To: Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Supervisor - Town of Wappinger VIA FAX $ MAIL From: Peter J. Paggi CC: Hon. Gloria Morse, Town Clerk Town Board: File Ralph Holt, Town of Wappinger Recreation Chairman Peggy Roe, Town of Wappinger Recreation Dept Michael Tremper, CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. Date: 03/26/03 Re: Robinson Lane Recreation Site: Water System Comrhents: On this date, our office and representatives of CAMO Pollution Control, Inc.conducted a field inspection of the Robinson Lane Recreation Site water system. The specific purpose was to inspect the condition of the existing pressure tank, which reportedly had been leaking. Our findings and recommendations are as follows: ♦ While no leaks were evident at the time of our inspection, it is obvious that the tank condition has deteriorated over time. The tank is a Harvard Bonded Glass Lined type, approximately 20" in diameter, and 62" in height From a review of specifications provided by the manufacturer, it is most likely that this tank is a Model M10-82, with a volume of 82 gallons. ♦ While there are various methods that could be employed in an attempt to fix the tank, the results would likely provide only a temporary cure. It is our belief that it would be more effective to simply install a new pressure tank at the site. ♦ We would recommend that the Town install one (1) Well X -Trot Diaphragm Type Pressure Tank: Model WX — 350, 26" diameter by 62" high, or approved equal. This tank is the same make and model that was installed in the Town Emergency Services 0 Page 1 Building. We would further recommend that the new tank be famished with a safety tank cross including relief valve, pressure switch, pressure gauge and drain valve. ♦ Additionally, we would recommend that the Town install a meter on the inlet line to the new tank. Said meter should be installed in a meter setter type installation, with a check valve and two isolating gate or ball valves. A meter size of 3/." would be sufficient. Acceptable meter makes would be Sensus, lnvensys, Badger, Rockwell, or approved equal. ♦ Once the new tank and meter is installed, we would recommend that the system operators take regular meter readings to determine actual usage rates. Based on said data, a determination can be made as to how the entire system should be configured. Revisions and/or additions to the system could then be made, in conformance with the recommendations of our October 9, 1998 Report The ultimate system would be similar in nature to those previously installed by the Town in the Emergency Services Building and the Castlepoint Bathroom Building. ♦ We would estimate that removal of the old tank, installation of the new tank, meter and piping installation and appurtenances would cost approximately $ 5,000. Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Thank you for your consideration. S:/DRAW INGS/PROJ ECT/DOCUMENTStroNnsonlanerec.water.3.26.03 0 Page 2 09/26/2003 12:26 8454710905 Memo PAGGI MARTIN DELBENE PAGE 01 s Town of Wappinger MAI Ta Hon. Joseph Rugglem, Supervi or FrWM Deter J. Paggl cm Hon. Giom Manse, Tam Clerk RECEIVE Town Boer ± Rile Ralph Holt, Town of VV*PPkW Recreation Che Mm MAR 2 6 200,E Peggy Roe, Town of WaPp'rQw Recreation Dept, Michael Tramper, CAMO Pollution Control, kr- TOWN CLERK Dots 03a= Rea Roblrworl Lane Recreatlon Sika: Water System A— on this d , our office and represenUtives of CRMO Potlutlon Control, !r►c =Ducted a Meld inspecklan aif the Robinson Lana Recreation Site water system. The speditc pine was to Inspect the condition of the O"ting pressure tank, which repoAedly had bean lealclrg. Our Wings and recomnondations are as fokmm' ♦ vvN19 no leaks were evident at the time of our Inspection, it is otbvkwa that to tank ©oncdition has detedm*ed over gmo. The tank is a Harvard Bonded Glass Lind ", epproAmahgy 20" in d*ywSsr, and W in might From a review of "cftld" provided by the ear, k is most likely tot this tank is a Madsl M1D42,. with a vokmv of 82 OWL ♦ While there are various methods �°oO" cures QI is aur belief that k would be mare results would likely provid et%dVe to simply instau anew pressure tank at the site. ♦ We would recarr mend that ft Town instil one (1) WOLX Trod Diaphragm TYPe Pressure Tank: Model=-- 350, 2w cliameW by 67 high, or approved aqua'. This tank is .the Now n-wo and model that waa installed in the Town EavW961c1 601"Ac" 0 Page # 03/26/2003 22:26 8454710905 PAGGI MARTIN DELBENE PAGE 02 Buldlna. We would further recommend that the now tank be iumished with a safety tank axw indudbv reilef valve, pressure swi Dutchess County Department of Health William R. Steinhaus County Executive Michael C. Caldwell, mr)'NIP11 Commissioner 387 Main Mail Poughkeepsie New York 12601 (914) 486-3400 Fax (914) 486-3447 Supervisor Constance Smith & Town Board Town of Wappinger PO Box 324 Wappingers Falls NY 12590 RE: Wappinger Robinson Lane Recreation Public Water Supply PWS #1330219, Town of Wappinger Dear Supervisor Smith and Town Board: We have received results from a water sample collected from Well #1 on 3-21- 2000. The results show the water quality to meet drinking water standards, with the exception of iron (5.52 mg/1) and color (150 units), both aesthetic concerns. It is recommended that the water be re -tested for these two parameters a few times this season to determine what variations exist, if any, with these parame- ters. A test for silver (new parameter) should also be completed since it was not included with the 3-21-2000 results. Water testing this season should also include monthly bacteria testing of the raw well water and finished water from the distribution system. Monthly operation re- ports will need to be submitted with free chlorine residual readings. The chlorine feed rate may need to be adjusted frequently due to the extremely high iron lev- els. Brown water conditions may occur. It is recommended that the stand-by well (#2) be tested for total coliform, nitrate and nitrite in case this well needs to be placed into service in an emergency. Engineer plans and reports for the "phase 2" improvements must be submitted and approved by this Department prior to construction. If there are any questions, please call me at 486-3404. )Je4y truly yn rs,,' i DT)niel O'Connor, P.E. Senior Public Health Engineer Environmental Health Services enc. cc: Ralph Holt, Recreation Director ,(w/enc.) CAMO Pollution Control (w/enc.) Joseph Paggi, P.E. (w/enc.) Beacon district office file,(w/enc.) Ln N O ro W O H W m O Li Li U -1 0 '•-I U 0 0 I •• it W a m mro SA m rrd o FUj 11 O U • N O1 °u W 0 m ur H H v u Oa9 3 2 O N a M w H O N o eq m p 4 x W O 0 U W z M o M -[A o 0 � z z N O •• z� H H O � a w o H Z P4 u .. •'I a N O W 10 b A a.l u H N u a a� u a a� O „ w a a .r m 0 P. .rl a° ID H O F. rr u W a iJ U a r-1 O u N L ro q q a a. I M N H M M M H H H m m m m H m 01 m ON H H H H H r 1. r n n n r n r w w w m r m w m m n n r n r dl dl d' dl V� VI dl d� V' H H H H dl H H H H •e d 10 d v H H W H N H H H H g 0 0 0 H 0 O O O H H H H H M H H N N H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H R H a a a a a a a a H I- Ul y W Ul W W Ul U] FN. W N N \ mmm m m m m m w a H m m m w m m w 0 ut 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o O v O o q q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g 0 v O O p p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 .il o 0 Co 0 0 0 o N o 0 0 0 o d a o o a o n N o wgoNr Hoo 000r omoon�nu-loo 0000rlo r O Co U} 14 0 0 In O 0 a N u1 o H H N o o 0 0 o o m O O o ri o o o o o 0 o c n N Ln In N u H W WA A � H Rua�N 800 z0 z0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 00 a m a a a a m 0 0 a O v a 0 0 a a a 0 0 D O 0 a a a >4 }i •Si >1 Yi Y+ �'+ ?+ P'I z z Y+ z Y+ N x z � �+ N v H w 4 H H w H H H H H H H HH w H .• 1i ri w H H H N 'oro 'o 16 m rd rd N H •.+ .� N rd tJ U -IV •H J-1 L1 u 11 ai b b 10 ro '.i w •0 4j •j M M •r1 41 •j ro a a ro •.i d rd a a ro rd 0 ro N v -0 •0 •'I N U 11 aJ a7 al L 41 1 a1 a a al m 'a a m N a a L U U L •'I -p "-'I •" •rl •'1 •q W W H A, W W W W RI W •'I a a H H H H H H H H H j% (n N W' H $9 94 a co 19 p4 W py' Q.• H UJ to H N N 2w2 2229 2222 H p A H H H H H H H H IH--� {rr-71 F ��-iI WH �, H77 �, H}} W H 3 Z P4 Z p 3 W W W 3 3. 3 3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N H H H H H H H H H H H H H 00000 0000 Inrmm0in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m mm o m n mm0 m m m o 0000 0 0 0 0 P o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m m m o m m m m o 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N H H H H N H H H H N ry N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ opppd ddPormn Inmrino \ \ \ \ \ \ 00 00 N H q N N N N N N N N N H d d H N O O H N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Al M 1�1 M r.l f•1 f•I M f•1 dl dl yl dl C1 d• O O O O O P d P P P 9 P O P 0 W vil W M O O O O M Fl t+l �`1 0 0 0 0 O O O O O P O O 0 M n m m 0 0 W 1T m m O H N M a O O g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d m m m m o m m 01 m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m o m m m m m d d P dP o 0 N N N N N N N N N H H H H N H H H H H N N N N N N N N N N N \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 o H H H H H H M H H H H H H H g o 0 0 N N N N N N N N N [+i NI ['�1 NI f•1 M1 hl M I+1 M N eM M M M N N N N f'1 m i`7 i'1 /�1 RI m m m N N N N N N ry H N 0 0 0 o o o H H H H N H H N N N o P O p O O P P d O H H H H H H H H f•i H N 0 U U U U U U CJ G O N N N N N M M irl r1 .n m m mmm IJ V U P, 00 oon0000z 2x2zz2229RR2222c(A� H N M W In to h m m o H N r� d' ul b 1� m m P H N m d u, 1O n m N N N N N N N N N v -A m m U � H U A ro O 4 R u -1 0 q.H I-II O 7 -4 Ai 0 � ro 0tn • 41 x u' •r�, a rt a : q H y i7 U U a H O PL V H w A 0oo O 10 -.i 0 5C a b H m G H „ rl m R rd rµin F H O I W roa ITi �., w m m 3 H 04 rd W i N QI �- z U g 0 V) 0 a m m z z N m W w Q m ol U2 m E r "d) m \ H a H,p o (d v m a 43 b° O y+ H E x O k m (d d 0 u°F 0 Si v -H?I "m yv a uppa ch -ra w w L ro v of a° qZ 0 p ro ~i G 3 aHi a w u b El) y}{1 m m a W L; O N[.7 b u t A al z H U0y 3 m. 0 3� `Owb 10 S1 d W N H Li w O W 0 W m m rt n H o u k a u v II q 3 u z u En 44 0 0 \ E Cl dT O 0 7 W v WC ul £° aN E [A q R FI O N M H N t; m 0 0 •rl V 0 •• a a W x ro bn 0 s1 0 u a A H i z x N bi Ln R •-roi o u ro H b n V� •O H �-• m I m •.i >, m� a Q •.wi A �>ti m R m a u AA mq V a; ID a ~ ci >, p �d � N �• E.IH-r Q u b dl Iia a> a M W W u u 0 u N ro m N r -I � � •'1 •'i O Si ro N QI .� a IA6 ri ioi b 1.1 rCH W b A �41 N •ri Id a LL !� HI O •ri m ro W 44 O O p U1 -4r w �.41 k v+°rovumcao�m(d.0 vw U•H•.,mm WI Hq 0 O b) {t)1 H r -I P1 •w'i 1UJ i1 N as r -I Fi 11 A A •rt U ;l a a-1 Id m m 0 0 0 ro (IS U U 011 *11 m u -� A b H H E E •rC1 fa N b x°Mar"�aaw" n wca� H 4-7 q II qqh C7 U Ch C7 M C7 b O a IWA r� Q 4 0 0 0 P IU4' O' O w k, £ IQ {{�# I -i H r -I W LLLL fn in ,c U fx To: Wappinger Town Board, attention: Constance O. Smith From: Peter J. Paggi ?-�Fp CC: Vincent Bettina, Councilman Joseph Paoloni, Councilman Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman Robert Vaidati, Councilman Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk Ralph Holt, Recreation Department Michael Tremper, CAMO Pollution Control Date: 04/12/93 Re: Robinson Lane Recreation Site Water System Comments: REFC'EIVED APR 14 1999 ELAINE 'OWN C,L� pEN As directed by the Town Board, this office has solicited bids from qualified firms to perform Phase 1 (investigative) water quantity and quality analysis for the Robinson Lane Recreation Site water system, The parameters shall be as per our October 9, 1999 Report, which received verbal approval from Mr. Daniel O'Connor of the Dutchess County Health Department. Request For Proposal letters were sent out to four qualified local firms on 3117/99. `The only proposal received by the 4109199 deadline was from P,F. Beal & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $ 1260.00 ($850 quantity/ $410 quality). A copy of their proposal is enclosed herein. This office would recommend that the bid from P.F. Beal be accepted, and that work be scheduled to begin as soon as possible. We will coordinate all work schedules with Ralph Holt so as to avoid disrupting activities at the site. Please advise this office as to clow you would like us to proceed in the matter. Any questions or comments may be addressed to this office. Cad11DATAIDRAW INGS00CUMENTSVobinsonln.beal.4.12.99 • Page 1 PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914-471-7898 914-471-0905 (FAX) *** REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL *** DATE: March 17'h, 1999 FROM: Paggi, Martin & Del Bene LLP, Consulting Engineers RE: Water Qantaty, and Qu�-'Jty Analysis Town of WaVpinger Robinson Lane Recreation Site Water System Dear Contractor: The Town of Wappinger is currently accepting proposals from qualified firms to supply water quantity and quality analysis for Robinson Lane Recreation Site water system. BID ITEMS ITEM SPECIFICATIONS QUANTITY TOTAL PRICE ` 0 y QUANTITY SEE ENCLOSED LUMP SUM S TESTING r QUALITY SEE ENCLOSED LUMP SUM $ 3 TESTING Pleasc pro -.,de quotes by 12:00 noon cr. riday, Apol 91', 19oa Any questions regarding this chatter may be addressed to Paggi, Martin & Del Bene, LLP at the above referenced number. WI Peter J. Paggi PJP:Iaw Enclosure cc: Bidder's List: Andrew's Well Drilling, Inc. Clapp Hill Road LaGrangeville, NY 12540 J.T. Eckerson, Inc. 1613 Route 9W Milton, NY 12547 Boyd Artesian Well Co. R.D. #5, Route 52 Carmel, NY 10512 P.E. Beal & Sons Route 52 Hopewell Junction New York 12533 Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., P.E. Ernst. A1,artin, Jr„ P.E,, L.S. Charles R. Dei Bene, Jr., P.E. F P.F. BEAL & SONS, INC. 4 PUTNAM AVENUE ARTESIAN WELLS eREWSTER, NEW YORK 10509 WATER SYSTEMS 2rak4Aa-4a AN/ - Ooft 11430 SURA C'��ltttd JET PUMPS SUBMERSIBLE RUMPS TET.. 279.2460 - 2461 FAX 279.6613 COMPLETE INSTALLATION, REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR SERIVICE April 1, 1999 Paggi, Martin & Del Bene LLP Attn: Peter Paggi 54-56 Main street Poughkeepsie, New fork 12601 Dear Mr. Paggi: WATER TANKS COMMERCIAL WATER SYSTEMS HYDROFRACTURING WATER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT" Enclosed please find the request for proposal for the well testing at Robinson Lane. It is understood that there is an existing pump and existing power that we will be able to run the pump with, however, it will be impossible to tell you the physical condition of the existing pump without pulling it from the well. We will be able to check the pump motor electrically with an ohm meter to test for shorts in the wiring or in the motor and we will be able to do an amp draw test to give some idea about the condition of the pump while it is running. However, the price does not include removing the pump from the well for a physical examination. Very truly yours, P. F. Beal. & Sons lnc. Z, 4a�:ozm 4.B ea i, MTB/mm enclosure PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE LLP Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors 54-56 Main Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 914-471-7898 914-471-0905 (FAX) October 14, 1998 Recreation Department Town of Wappinger P.O. Box 324 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 Attention: Ralph Holt Reference: Proposed Water System Improvements Robinson Lane Recreation Site. Dear Ralph: Enclosed please find a Preliminary Report regarding the proposed water system improvements at the Robinson Lane Recreation site. As discussed during our field meeting of October 9, 1998, we would recommend a two phase approach to the matter. The first phase would involve testing and inspection of the source, The second phase would entail the construction of the proposed improvements, The finished product would be similar to systems installed at the Emergency Services Building and the Castlepoint Bathroom sites. We have estimated the cost of the first (investigative) phase to be in the $2,500 to $4,000.00 range. Under the second phase (construction) improvements to the source are estimated at $3,000.00 to $4,500.00, while improvements inside the building are estimated at $10,000.00 to $13,000.00. Please note that these costs are preliminary estimates only, and subject to change depending on the results of the Phase 1 study. I have discussed the matter with Mr. Dan O'Connor of the Dutchess County Health Department, and he agreed in concept with our approach. Please review the material, and advise this office as to how you would like to proceed in the matter. Any questions or comments may be addresses to this office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very 'JP-agg� yo Peter a PJP:Iaw Enclosure cc: Hon, Constance O. Smith, Supervisor Hon. Vincent Bettina, Councilman Hon. Joseph Paoloni, Councilman Hon. Joseph Ruggiero, Councilman Han. Robert Valdati, Councilman Hon. Elaine Snowden Michael Tremper EuED (� CT 1 � �jggB Joseph E. Paggi, Jr., RE, Ernst Martin, Jr., P.E„ L.8, Charles K. Del Dene, Jr., RE. PRELIMINARY REPORT PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ROBINSON LANE RECREATION SITE TOWN OF WAPPINGER OCTOBER 9, 1998 PREPARED BY: PAGGI, MARTIN & DEL BENE, LLP CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 54-56 MAIN STREET POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PROBLEM AREAS I — 2 II. UNKNOWN SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS 3 III. GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENT 4 IV. PRPOSED PHASE I (INVESTIGATIVE) MEASURES 5 INCLUDING PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES V. PROPOSED PHASE 2 (CONSTRUCTION) MEASURES 6 — 7 INCLUDING PRELFVIINARY COST ESTIMATES VI. ADDITONAL CONSIDERATIONS 8 0 C, T 1 S `= ELANE r s TOWN CLERK —TC — L EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROBLEM AREAS The Robinson Lane Recreation Site encompasses a 50f acre parcel of land located in the northeasterly portion of the Town of Wappinger, adjacent to the Sprout Creek. The site houses numerous ballfields, food concession facilities and bathroom facilities. The food concession area appears to be used fairly extensively, including food preparation, cleaning and storage facilities, as well as such ancillary water usage items such as ice makers and soda machines. No data exists on average or peak usage rates. The existing water supply system that serves the site consists of two potable water wells (both terminating underground, with no well pit), a storage tank of unknown capacity, and a recently installed chlorination system consisting of a chlorine crock, metering pump and controls. The size, depth and type of the wells are unknown. The size, type and condition of the well pumps is unknown. The existing tankage, etc. is stored in a 4'2" x 7'6" room within the masonry block building that houses the food concession and the bathroom facilities. With the exception of the recently installed chlorination system, all components appear to be fairly old. Since the site is adjacent to and in all likelihood draws from the Sprout Creek aquifer, it is assumed that the general groundwater quality is similar to that of such nearby downstream public water supply systems as the Hilltop and Rockingham Wellfields. Recent bacteriological analysis indicating a positive sample or samples for total coliform has prompted the Dutchess County Health Department to request that system -wide improvements be initiated. While the exact source of the bacteriological contamination may be difficult to pinpoint, it is reasonable to assume that it results from a deficiency in the existing production well and delivery system, and/or an internal cross connection. Given the age and condition of the existing system, it may prove to be more cost effective to simply replace the components, rather than to spend money trying to pinpoint their deficiencies. For these reasons, we would recommend that a complete overhaul of the system be undertaken. A two phase approach to this problem as outlined below could prove to be the most cost effective. PHASE 1: This would constitute an investigative phase, and would include the following: 1 A complete physical, chemical and microbiological analysis of the water. ♦ A pump test to determine the safe yield of the two potable wells. Since no current consumption data exists, the maximum safe well output would be used to design the new system components. . ♦ Static water levels, drawdown and recovery. ♦ An investigation of the well construction and condition. ♦ An investigation of the type and condition of the existing pumps. ♦ An investigation of possible sources of contamination. The results of this Phase 1 investigation would allow for the proper design of replacement components. PHASE 2: This would constitute the rehabilitation and/or replacement construction determined from the Phase 1 Study, and would include the following: ♦ Reconstruction of the wells, and well head protection measures. ♦ Metering facilities. ♦ Pumping components. ♦ Storage components. ♦ Chlorine detention components. ♦ Control system. ♦ Internal piping and valving. These two phases, as well as preliminary cost estimated for performing the work are detailed herein. It should be noted that the finished system proposed herein is similar in design to that of two other facilities within the Town of Wappinger (Emergency Services Building and Castlepoint Recreation Site Bathrooms), both of which were approved by the Dutchess County Health Department. Subsequent to the Phase 1 investigation, but prior to the Phase 2 construction, this office would recommend contacting the Dutchess County Health Department in order to get their input in the matter. -2- H. UNKNOWN SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS: No detailed information exists for the following system components and/or characteristics. These items will need to be investigated as part of the Phase I study prior to final design of the system. 1. Available source quality. 2. Water quality, 3. Size, depth, construction and condition of wells. 4. Size, type and condition of well pumps. 5. Static and drawdown groundwater elevations, including interference between the wells. 6. Possible sources of contamination. 7. Usage characteristics for average and peak days. 8, Size, type, location and condition of buried supply piping, valving, etc. It should be noted that the work to be done in conjunction with this system improvement is expected to be limited to the wellheads themselves, and the inside of the building. No extensive investigation of, or repairs to the existing buried piping is anticipated. It is assumed that no raw supply lines tee off the well lines prior to the point of chlorination inside the building. This will need to be verified, and rectified as necessary. -3- M. GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS The following minimum requirements should be attained in order to conform to local Health Codes and acceptable operation practices:. SOURCE: The construction and siting of the wellheads should exclude possible sources of contamination, and provide an adequate sanitary seal to prevent intrusion into the well. A minimum finished elevation of two (2) feet above the highest known flood elevation is recommended. Access to the pump should be provided via either a well pit, or a pitless unit. The total developed groundwater source capacity should equal or exceed the design maximum day demand. Two separate sources of groundwater are recommended. 2.UO ALITY: The microbiological, physical and chemical quality of the water should be tested in accordance with Part 5 of the State Sanitary Code. Since the system serves at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year, it is deemed to be a Public Non -Community system. The testing parameters and frequency for such a system are outlined in Part 5 of the State Sanitary Code. 3. PUMPING FACILITIES: The pumps should be designed to deliver the maximum expected demand against the maximum system pressure in the most hydraulically efficient manner. Controls should be provided for automatic pump operation. 4. STORAGE: Sufficient storage capacity should be provided to insure adequate chlorine contact time, and to prevent excessive pump cycling. In this application, pre -pressurized, bladder type tanks should be utilized. 5. CHLORINE CONTACT: The system utilizes an existing hypochlorite injection system to provide disinfection. This system should be augmented by the installation of a chlorine contact tank. Since the proposed bladder tanks are teed off of, and "float" on the supply line, their use as chlorine contact facilities may result in inadequate contact times. We would recommend the installation of a normally flooded, galvanized steel tank with the inlet at the bottom of the tank and the outlet at the top. This tank would be sized to provide a minimum of fifteen (15) minutes of chlorine contact at the peak pumping rate. -4- IV. PROPOSED PHASE 1 (INVESTIGATIVE) MEASURES: The following measures would need to be undertaken in order to compile necessary data to design a suitable water supply system: I. WATER UALITYANALYSIS: No recent records: are available regarding comprehensive water quality analysis. We would recommend that raw water samples be taken and analyzed, at a minimum, for the following parameters. (Modified Part 5 Analysis): ♦ Arsenic ♦ Copper ♦ Barium ♦ Corrosivity ♦ Cadmium ♦ Iron ♦ Chromium ♦ Manganese ♦ Lead ♦ Sodium ♦ Mercury ♦ . Sulfate ♦ Selenium ♦ Zinc ♦ Silver ♦ Color ♦ Fluoride ♦ Odor ♦ Nitrate ♦ Total Coliform ♦ Chloride The approximate price range for this work is estimated to be $500.00 to $1,000.00. 2. PUMP TEST: A 24 hour (possible less if approved by the Dutchess County Health Department) pump test should be performed to determine the safe yield of the source supply. This would include all static water levels, drawdown and recovery period information. It is anticipated that this test would be performed on the larger production well, with drawdown/interference readings taken on the other well. It may also be necessary to conduct a shorter duration pumping test on the smaller well. These pump tests would also allow for inspection of the well and pumps, and could include an investigation of possible nearby sources of contamination. The approximate price range for this work is estimated to be $ 2,000.00 to $3,000.00. -5- V. PROPOSED PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION MEASURES: The extent of rehabilitation and/or replacement of components required to upgrade the system will be dependent on the results of the Phase I Study. A list of likely replacement parts as well as preliminary cost estimates is as follows: It should be noted that the exact cost for these items will be dependent on the size and type required, which cannot be determined until the Phase 1 investigation is completed. These estimated prices reflect actual costs incurred during recent Town projects similar in scope to this one (i.e. Emergency Services Building and Castlepoint Bathrooms). 1, SOURCE PROTECTION: The existing conditions wherein the wellheads terminate below grade (without a well pit) are not a recommended practice due to the possible intrusion of contaminants. This is especially true for low lying, flood -prone areas. Phase 1 investigations will almost certainly recommend that both wellheads be raised to a finished elevation a minimum of two feet above grade. This would be accomplished by welding a pitless unit to the existing casing, or by installing pitless adapter units and additional casing to the existing wells. The estimated price range for performing this work is $ 1,500.00 to $2,000.00, 2. PUMPS: If either the condition or size of the existing pumps precludes their re -use, new submersible pumps designed from Phase I investigation data would be installed. The estimated price range for furnishing and installing two submersible pumps of this type including appurtenances is $1,500,00 to $2,500,00. 3. METERS: In order to maintain accurate future usage records, meters should be installed on both sources. The estimated price range for furnishing and installing two meters is $500.00 to $1,000.00. 4. STORAGE: New bladder type storage tanks designed from Phase I investigation data will be required. The estimated price range for furnishing and installing storage tanks of this type including appurtenances is $ 2,500.00 to $3,500.00. WIS 5. CHLORINE CONTACT: Chlorine contact facilities designed from Phase 1 investigation data will .be required. The estimated price range for furnishing and installing chlorine contact facilities of this type including appurtenances is $1,500.00 to $ 2,000.00. 6. CONTROLS: Automated controls to operate the • well pumps and chlorination system will be required. The estimated price range for furnishing and installing controls of this type is $1,000.00 to $1,500.00. 7. INTERNAL PIPING AND VALVING: The internal (building) piping and valving including drains and/or blow off connections, sample taps, etc. will need to be replaced to conform to the new system.. The estimated price range for furnishing and installing the internal piping and valving is $4,500.00 to $5,000.00. -7- VI: ADDITONAL CONSIDERATIONS: Subsequent to completion of the Phase 1 (investigation) work and Phase 2 (construction) work, it may prove necessary to rehabilitate and/or replace additional system components. Passible improvement may be necessary in the following areas: 1. External (service line) piping and valving. This would include verifying that no raw supply lines tee off the well lines prior to the point of chlorination inside the building. Any such connections would need to be corrected. 2. Cross connection control devices such as check valves, vacuum breakers, RPZ's, etc. 3. Repair and/or replacement of the existing valve pit. 4. Electric service to the well pumps. S. Architectural adjustments to the inside of the building to accommodate new system components. 6. Consideration should be given to contracting for, or preparing a protocol for Town personnel to perform the daily operation and maintenance of this, and similar, Town Recreation site facilities. POLLUTION CONTROL, INC. Operation of Water and Wastewater Treatment Systems 1910 ROUTE 376 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 (914) 463-7310 Fax (914) 463-7305 REC' ;EIVEr, .0 AUG I o 1998 TOWN ni: M -E -M -0 -R -A -N -D -U -M TO: Connie Smith, Town of Wappinger Supervisor FROM: Michael P. Tremper, CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. DATE: August 6, 1998 RE: Robinson Lane Recreation Area On July 30, 1998, CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. finished the installation of the chlorination system at the Robinson Lane Recreation Area. The system is set up so that the chlorinator operates when the #I well pump, the main pump, is in operation, CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. has installed and adjusted the chlorine feed system to maintain an adequate chlorine residual per Part 5 of the NYS Sanitary Code. On August 4, 1998, CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. collected a coliform sample of the chlorinated distribution water. The sample passed with no coliform count. We have contacted the Health Department and they indicated that the water at the Recreation Area will be allowed to be used for drinking. However, just like any other public water supply system, they are requesting daily chlorine residuals, monthly coliform samples and all associated reporting from the Robinson Lane Recreation Area. CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. will immediately start working with Steve from the Recreation Department to comply with the Health Department's requirements. This will ensure safe drinking water at the Recreation Area for the rest of the season. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, do not hesitate to contact me at (914) 463-7310. MI,T 0003 (a'mPOLLUTION CONTROL, INC. Operation of Water and Wastewater Treatment Systems 1910 ROUT ^ E I D E WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 1 !1 V EL-•. J914) 463. 3 Fax (914) 463-7305 JUN 30 1997 SUPERVISOR'S OFFICE TOWN OF WAPPINGER M -E -M -O -R -A -N -D -U -M TO: Connie Smith, Town of Wappinger Supervisor FROM: Michael P. Tremper, CRMO Pollution Control, Inc.y:,� DATE: June 26, 1997 RE: Robinson Lane Recreation Park Well The Town of Wappinger has been notified by the Dutchess County Health Department that they recommend either a chlorination system be installed at the Robinson Lane Recreation Park, or a waiver of chlorination be applied for. Obtaining a waiver of chlorination requires numerous coliform sampling and paperwork, and the Health Department very rarely issues a waiver of chlorination. CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. recommends the installation of a chlorine system very similar to the one installed at the Brexel-Schlathaus Recreation Area in 1996. The cost for CRMO Pollution Control, Inc. to install a chlorinator and wire it in with the well control, allowincT it to operate when the well field is on, would be $500.00. This cost includes the purchase of equipment and labor. It should be noted that the $500 is for the equipment only, and that CAMO Polluticn Control, Inc. wall donarc_ the labor to the recreation area. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter_ further, i can be reached at (914) 463-7310. CC: Jay Paggi, Town of Wappinger Engineer .Ralph molt; Chairman, Recreation Commissicn MPT:dt0172 Town of Wappinger