2000-04-25
, "
MINUTES
APPROVED
MAY 09 2000
Zoning Board of Appeals
Summarized Minutes April 25,2000
page 1
....
MINUTES
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
MEETING DATE: April25,2000
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
Town Hall
20 Middlebush Road
Wappinger Falls, NY
Members Present:
Mr. Lehigh,
Mr. Warren,
Chairman
Member
Mr. Fanuele, Vice Chairman
Mr. diPierno, Member
Members Absent:
Mr. Prager, Member
Others Present:
Mr. Liebermann,
Mr. K. vinge,
Zoning Administer
Planner to Town
Mr. Roberts, Attorney to Town
Ms. DiPaola, Secretary to Zoning
SUMMARIZED
Adjourned Public Hearing:
Hannaford Supermarket
- Adjourned until 5/9/00
........ Discussions:
Cindy Dewey
Denise Bertolino
- Site Inspection 4/29/00
- Site Inspection 4/29/00
Mr. Fanuele: Made a motion to approve the April 11,2000 minutes as corrected.
Mr. Warren: Second the motion. . i
V ote: All present voted aye.
ADJOURNED PUBLIC HEARING
Appeal No. 99-7031 at the request of Hannaford Supermarket, who is seeking 3 variances of Section 240-
112 and 240-97 - Whereas 50 feet minimum rear yard setback is required, the appellants are proposing 30 feet
rear yard setback, thus requestine 20 feet rear yard setback to allow 30 foot rear yard for a rather small
portion of the rear yard.
Whereas a 20% building coverage is required, the aPl?ellants are proposing 21.3% building coverage, thus
requestine a 1.3% more than zonine currently permits.
Appeal No. 99-7032 - Whereas 873 parking spaces is required, the appellants are proposing 7 space net increase
in parking from existing conditions. thus requestine a 218 space variance to allow a total of 655 spaces. a
space increase from the existine 648 spaces. The property is located on Route 9 approximately 165 feet north
on Myers Corners Road in the Town of Wappinger.
......... Peter Friedrichs applicant, Ross Winglovitz applicant's engineer and Steve Reilly applicant's attorney is
present for the public hearing.
MINUTES
APPROVEO
HAY 0 9 2000
Zoning Board of Appeals
Summarized Minutes April 25,2000
page 2
...
Mr. Warren: Made a motion to open the adjourn public hearing.
Mr. diPiemo: Second the motion.
V ote: All present voted aye.
........
Mr. Reilly: I would like to indicated that the notices that were required by the Zoning Board, they have been
filed with the Secretary of the Board. March 28,200 through April 11,2000 the Planning Board
did not make a determination to the SEQRA. The Planning Board did approve the SEQRA on
April 17,2000.
Do we have anything in writing stating that?
Dan had to revise the resolution and then he will give out the resolution.
With regard to the SEQRA, the building coverage we will be increasing the amount of green
space. Also the size of parking spaces we would like to withdraw the application for that
variance. The Planning Board approved the 9x18 spaces with their site plan approval. The sign
variance is also withdrawn at this point.
Mr. Winglovitz: We prepared a little brief statement in writing because there were some questions from the
previous public hearing. We have a table of what has gone on in the pass with the parking and
the approvals. (they handed the packet to the board and the secretary. He reads over the packet.)
Mr. Lehigh: These two studies use 9x 18 parking spaces?
Mr. Winglovitz: They have different space size, that <;loesn't affect the number of parking spaces. It depends on
, I
the configuration. Based on our design there is 400 spaces within 3 different sites. We found that
we will only need 321 spaces in the 3 parking fields. There is 302 parking spaces within the
entrance to the door. There is sufficient parking within the entrance of the building.
Mr. Roberts: On page 3 of your submission, you indicated that number of spaces to 302 spaces based on 4,312
square feet of retail space 12,188...
Mr. Winglovitz: If you look at our building and the way it is used is about 43,212 square feet is used as retail
the rest of it is used for storage and fopd preparation.
Mr. Roberts: On page 2, you indicate that there is 321 spaces available based on the parking study that was
done.
Mr. Lehigh:
Mr. Kvinge:
Mr. Reilly:
Mr. Lehigh: I would like to look at the rest of the information and then have you come back. I would like to
close the hearing and then within 60 days make a decision.
,-""Mr. Roberts: I think the site plan should be read into the record.
MINUTES
APPROVro
HAY 09 2000
Zoning Board of Appeals
Summarized Minutes April 25,2000
page 3
.....
Mr. Winglovitz: This is a amended site plan, Wappinger Plaza. It was dated 10-12-99 last revised 2-29-00,
map number C-I0l
Mr. Adams: I understand that the applicant is no longer seeking an variance for the size of spaces. I have a
written statement for my comments. My letter has to be modify because of the size of the
parking spaces. Its our precision that a reduction from 800 to 600 spot is about 33% of a
reduction.
If you were to grant this application, you would be permitting a zoning scheme to satisfy the
applicants. The court note said if the parcel gets larger you have less disgrestion. There is
nothing physically about this site that creates any pediments have a shopping center where the
number of spaces that conform. The size of this parcel and the existing approvements preclude
you from granting this variance, based upon the dimension of the variance that he wants. If they
want a store that size, they can find a site that accommodates that store and accommodate the
number of parking spaces. There are other sites in the Town of Wappinger.
I think you are beyond my ability to grant the variance. As far as I know this is a flat site that has
'-'
no geographic features that preclude building portions. The only impediment here for this is the
size, its too small for the store that he wants. Its my belief it is beyond this board to grant this
variance and I have the balance of my argument on the written statement.
, '
Mr. Reilly: It seems to me that the argument made lfrom Mr. Adams might have more weight if it was a
greater variance. Weare not asking for a larger variance, we are reducing. The site has been
granted for the reduce number of parking spaces. We are talking about a 33% variance request,
and in the law suit it was 25%.
I would note that it was a case decided in 1971 and the Town Law has changed since then. We
do need to be competitive in this area. Why go out tear up a new site, when you already have an
existing site that had the same use on~t. It makes more sense to go with the old site, than go with
a whole new site. I don't believe that any public hearing that we have had, there is no objection
to this variance.
Mr. Roberts: Tonight we received testimony to the number of parking spaces. In the legal notice is says they
are required 873 spaces and in the submission was 719. That has changed in 1994 when another
store came in. It indicated that there are 736 parking spaces that were required and the approved
quantity was 636.
"'-'"
MINUTES
APPROVED
MAY 0.9 2DOO
Zoning Board of Appeals
Summarized Minutes April 25,2000
page 4
.......
Tonight they indicated they only need 302 parking spaces for a facility contains 43,312 square feet of retail
space and 12,188 square feet of storage. It seems to me someone has to clarify the quantity for
the number of spaces that is required. I recommend this board send a letter to the Planning
Board to clarify the number of spaces.
We thought at the time that was the required number of parking spaces. The Zoning analysis on
page 3 that is saying that some code will allow the applicant to subtract out storage spaces.
Whether it is 873 or 736 spaces, there is more than sufficient parking. We are still going to be
below the number of spaces that is required. This is all done under Hannaford analysis.
Mr. Reilly:
Mr. Lehigh:
Mr. Reilly:
Out of 873 that is required, you can still only provided 655 spaces?
That is correct.
Mr. Roberts: For the record this is contain in Section 240-97 of the Zoning Code. (read the list on the page)
Mr. Reilly: There is less retail space, I think our analysis still applies.
Mr. Warren: Made a motion to have an executive session.
........ Mr. diPiemo: Second the motion.
V ote: All present voted aye.
Went into executive session at 8:15
Mr. Warren: Made a motion to come out ofthe e~ecutive session.
Mr. diPiemo: Second the motion. i
V ote: All present voted aye.
Came out of executive session at 8:40
Mr. Lehigh: Since we had some new information, we have some question for the Plalming Board and the
Zoning Administer. The next meeting we will put you on is May 9, 2000
Mr. Roberts: You need the Planning Board SEQRA determination. It has been edited, but have not been
submitted for signatures. It will be done soon. We want those documents in the public record
here. We are going to request from the Planning Board or the Zoning Administer a analysis on
how the parking spaces were determine in the first instincts and what the actual count is for this
plaza. We want to get that resolved. .,~
Mr. Winglovitz: We have gone through with Wappinger Plaza and got each use within the building and we
used that for the calculations.
Mr. Roberts: There was a variance granted in 1994 and that variance applies to the whole site. The Zoning
Board wants an understanding how we went from 636 that was approved to 873. They want to
get that clarify, before they make a decision.
.......
~!:,"iS
(,..',-'",:(JVEO
MAY \) 9 2000
Zoning Board of Appeals
Summarized Minutes April 25,2000
page 5
.....
Mr. Warren: Made a motion to adjourn the public hearing until May 9,2000.
Mr. diPiemo: Second the motion.
V ote: All present voted aye.
DISCUSSIONS
1. Cindy Dewey - Seeking 2 area variances to put an above ground pool in. The property is located at 18
Lenny Court in the Town of Wappinger.
Cindy Dewey is present for the discussion.
Mrs. Dewey: This is our property. We have plenty of room for the pool. I traced my survey onto here. The
property here is owned by the Town of Wappinger. It is Conservation property. There is 3 lots
that boarders our property. Majority of the properties that surround us have pools. There is a
tree line along the back of my house. I live on a cuI de sac.
Mr. diPiemo: What is that on the back of your house? Is that a deck?
....... Mrs. Dewey: It is an open deck, all the houses in the neighborhood came with them. Its 7 foot deck.
Mr. Warren: Are you going to put any kind of fencing around the pool?
Mrs. Dewey: No, just the fence that would come with the pool.
Mr. diPiemo: What is the shape of the pool? ' i
Mrs. Dewey: Its an oval shape.
Mr. Fanuele: There is a deck on the pool.
Mrs. Dewey: Not a permanent deck, something to get in and out of the pool.
Mr. Liebennann: The deck is part of the pool it comes with it.
Mr. Lehigh: How big is that?
Mrs. Dewey: It will stick out about 4 feet.
.,~
Mr. diPiemo: Can you change the position of your pool?
Mrs. Dewey: No matter, which way I turn it, it will is still need 10 feet.
Mr. Fanuele: Your lot is 10,000 square feet?
Mrs. Dewey: Yes.
tv1r. Lehigh: Is your lot the smallest lot?
~rs. Dewey: No actually it is one ofthe larger lots. There is plenty of room to put the pool in.
MINUTES
APPROVeo
MAY 09 2000
Zoning Board of Appeals
Summarized Minutes April 25,2000
page 6
-.-,
,
Mr. Lehigh: I think we will come out to look at it.
SITE INSPECTION April 29,2000 at 9:00 a.m.
2. Denise Bertolino - Seeking 2 area variances for a new garage and a bonus room. The property is located at
114 Diddell Road in the Town of Wappinger.
Denise Bertolino is present for the discussion.
Mrs. Bertolino: We want a 2 car garage with a bonus room on top.
Mr. Lehigh: You need 19 feet on one side and 15 feet on the other.
Mrs. Bertolino: There is nothing in front of our house. Our next door neighbor is at least 400 feet away from
use.
Mr. diPiemo: What is the style of your house? Is it a raised ranch?
...... Mrs. Bertolino: It just a regular ranch house.
Mr. Fanuele: How big is your lot now?
Mrs. Bertolino: It is a 1/3 of an acre.
Mr. Lehigh: We will have to come out and look at it.;
,
SITE INSPECTION
April 29,2000 at 10:00 a.m.
Mr. Warren:Made a motion to approve the site inspection as amended.
Mr. diPiemo: Second the motion.
V ote: All present voted aye.
Mr. diPierno: Made a motion to adjourn the meeting.
Mr. Warren: Second the motion. 'I
V ote: All present voted aye.
.......
Respectfully Submitted,
C~,vYvC^- 0 I PO.(fe.
Christina DiPaola, Secretary
Zoning Board of Appeals