1995-05-09n
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
"-Iv 9, 1995
nda - 7:30 P.M.
Approval of April 25, 1995 minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
FF
Town Hall
20 Middlebush Road
Wappinger Falls, N.Y.
1. Appeal 41197 - At the request of Annette & Joseph G. Patti who is
seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 421.6, where you are
required to maintain 10 ft. on the side -yard and 10 ft. on the
rear -yard and you are showing 3 ft. on the side -yard and 3 ft. on the
rear -yard, thus requiring a variance of 7 ft. on the side -yard and 7
ft. on the rear -yard on property located at 37 Balfour Drive and is
identified as Tax Grid #19-6257-02-759551-00 in the Town of Wappinger
2. Appeal 41200 - At the request of Nicholas & Josephine Johnson who is
seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 421.6, where you are
required to maintain 20 ft. on the side -yard and you are showing 38
ft., thus requiring an 18 ft. variance on property located at 16
Gabriella Drive and is identified as Tax Grid #19-6258-02-880907-00 in
the Town of Wappinger.
T SC.USSIONS
1. Raymond & Diane Samanich - To discuss Appeal #1201 requesting a 1.5
sideline variance for property located at 1 Sylvia Drive in the Town
of Wappinger.
2. Guardian Self Storage - To discuss Appeal #1202 requesting a 12%
variance for lot coverage on property located at 2021 Route 9 in the
Town of Wappinger.
& - F
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
May 9, 1995
Minutes
Members Present
Mr. Sasser: Chairman
Mr. Prager: Member
Mr. diPierno: Member
Members Absent
Mr. Lehigh: Member
Mr. Fanuele: Member
Others Present
Mr. Levenson, Zoning Administrator
Mrs. Linda Nguyen, Secretary to the Z.B.A.
9
Town Hall
20 Middlebush Road
Wappinger Falls, N.Y.
MAY 2 � 1995
PLANNING BOARD ❑
70MIN%RnAnnncAnnr° n /1011
Mr. Sasser: I call the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting for May 9, 1995 to
order. Would the clerk call the roll please?
ROLL CALL Mr. diPierno: Present. Mr. Prager: Here.
Mr. Fanuele: Absent. Mr. Lehigh: Absent.
Mr. Sasser: Here.
. Levenson: Mr. Chairman, the roll call has been called and the
absences have been noted.
Mr. Sasser: The first appeal tonight
Mr. Levenson: The minutes.
Mr. Sasser: Is the approval of the April 25 minutes.
Mr. Prager: I make a motion to accept the minutes as written.
Mr. diPierno: Second.
Vote: All ayes.
Mr. Sasser: The first public hearing tonight is Appeal #1197 - At the
request of Annette & Joseph G. Patti who is seeking a variance of Article
IV, Section 421.6 where you are required to maintain 10 ft. on the
side -yard and 10 ft. on the rear -yard and you are showing 3 ft. on the
side -yard and 3 ft. on the rear -yard, thus requiring a variance of 7 ft.
on the side -yard and 7 ft. on the rear -yard on property located at 37
Balfour Drive and is identified as Tax Grid #19-6257-02-759551-00 in the
Town of Wappinger. All the mailings came back, Herb?
Mr. Levenson: Yes, all the mailing have come back and the advertising,
affidavit. I also have compliance from Mr. Patti and I have pictures
and T was out there and measured.
Mr. Sasser: The Zoning Board has declared itself Lead Agency and a
Negative Dec. for SFQR. Can I have a motion to open the public. hearing?
Mr. Prager:
n
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 1995
Page 1
I make a motion that we open the public hearing.
Mr. diPierno: Second.
Vote: All ayes.
Mr. Sasser: Is there someone here representing the Patti's? Can you come
forward and just state your name for the record?
Mr. Patti: It is Joseph G. Patti.
Mr. Sasser: The shed that you have on the property now is one that has
been there? I presume you went for a refinancing and it was picked up?
Mr. Patti: It has been there through two refinancing actually.
Mr. Sasser: How long has the shed been on the property?
Mr. Patti: It was there when we moved in actually. It is a 1.2 by 12
wooden shed.
Mr. Sasser: Which is how long? You are talking 3 years, 5 years, 10
years?
Patti: Since 79.
Mr. Sasser: It looks like an old shed. Is it on a footing?
Mr. Patti: What it is on is cinder blocks. It rest on cinder blocks.
Cement block actually.
Mr. Prager: Could it be moved?
Mr. Patti: Well, the way the property is terraced, I get a lot of the
water that comes from the surrounding area because I am at the low point.
I had someone come in and look at the area to put a swale in. He stated
that he couldn't get the equipment in until sometime in the late summer
because the ground is so soft. I had made an attempt to start one, but it
is just to much to do by hand. So, to move the shed I would literally
have to wait until late summer and then empty it out. Still at that I
would need at least a bulldozer or something to move it because it is
pretty heavy.
Mr. Prager: It looks like it is pretty heavy.
Mr. Sasser: It also appears to me that it might not survive it.
Mr. Patti: It actually is in pretty good shape. It is solid. It is not
going to come down very easily.
. Levenson: Mr. Chairman and members of the Board, I was out there
pursuant to your instructions and I verified the measurements.
�w
Mr. Prager:
n
Thank you.
V
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9; 1995
Page 7
Mr. Sasser: We have just for the record a copy of the plot plan with the
shed and those measurements were ..
Mr. Levenson: 3 ft. on each side.
Mr. Sasser: Thank you. Is there anyone here tonight who would like to
speak with regard to this matter? Yes sir, could you stand ..?
Mr. Casazza: T am his neighbor. and I don't have any objection to where he
has his shed.
Mr. Sasser: Could we just have your name please?
Mr. Casazza: Mr. Raymond Casazza, I reside at 4 James Place.
Mr. Sasser: Thank you Mr. Casazza. You have no objection?
Mr. Casazza: No objection.
Mr. Sasser: Is there anyone else who would like to speak with .regard to
this matter.? Let the record show there was no one. Does the Board have
any further questions?
�*. Prager: No.
Mr. Sasser: I would just like to mention that the shed has been there
since 79. There was no one here that has any problem with that. The
Board's precedence has generally been to grant relief in these situations
because it is rather a minor variance. You understand that once the shed
comes down you would not be able to put it back in the same position that
it is there now?
Mr. Patti_: Right.
Mr. Sasser: I don't think it is going to change the neighborhood. There
is going to be no character change in the neighborhood. I don't see any
method to remedy this other than a variance. I certainly am in favor of
it. I would like to make ..
Mr. Prager: I would like to make a motion to close first.
Mr. diPierno: Second.
Vote: All ayes.
Mr. diPierno: I make a motion to grant relief.
Mr. Prager: Second.
SOLL CALL Mr. Prager: Aye. Mr. diPierno: Aye.
Mr. Sasser: Ave.
n
n
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 1995
Page 3
Mir. Levenson: Mr. Chairman, it is unanimous to grant.
Mr. Sasser: It will be filed within 5 days with the Town Clerk. The
second item on the agenda tonight is Appeal #1200 - At the request of
Nicholas & Josephine Johnson who are seeking a variance of Article IV,
Section 421.6 where you are required to maintain 20 ft. on the side -yard
and you are showing 38 ft., thus requiring a 18 ft. variance on property
located at 16 Gabriella Drive and is identified as Tax Grid
»19-6258-02-880907-00 in the Town of Wappinger. Mr. Johnson, you
understand that we are a three member Board tonight so it would require a
unanimous vote to grant approval? This Board has declared itself Lead
Agency and there has been a Negative Dec. for SEQR. Can I have a motion
to open the public hearing?
Mr. diPierno: So moved.
Mr. Prager: Second.
Vote: All ayes.
Mr. Sasser: I think that I had all of my questions answered at the
workshop with regard to this.
Mr. Levenson: The mailings and the advertising are in order.
. Sasser: Let the record show that the mailing and the advertising are
in order_. It doesn't appear to me that this is going to really change the
neighborhood at all. because it is going to blend in with the rest of the
house and I don't have a problem with it. Did you have anything you
wanted to add to this?
Mr. Johnson: Yes, there was some confusion with the way the public notice
read. Our neighbors brought it to our attention. Just to clarify we
would like to understand that the plan as we proposed was going to be 10
ft. off the property line and it kind of indicates that it was going to be
an 18 ft. variance which would essentially put us two feet off the
property line and the original plan was going to be 10 ft. off the
property line. I am not sure if that was just the way the numbers came
out or how it was calculated, but as I said we only need a variance of 1.0
ft., not 18.
Mr. Sasser: As a result of that it is not a requirement that we go hack
and renotice because you are looking for less of a variance.
Mr. Johnson: In discussing with my neighbors who are here, they expressed
some concern and I have asked our architect to look at the scale and see
if we can scale it back another 2. ft., but still maintain the overall
integrity We are trying to put a two car garage onto the extention
because we are taking that out to put the place where Josephine's mom and
clad are going. So, anyway I just wanted to make sure that we could be
ng, but I don't think I will be 2 ft. off the property line.
Sasser:
Mr. Johnson:
n
Herb, have you verified the ..?
a
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 1995
Page 4
I don't know if that is just where the calculation came out.
Mr. Levenson: Well, he is asking for less than what was advertised.
Mr. Sasser: Can you verify that it is a 10 ft. variance that we are
looking for?
Mr. Levenson: It is the first time I am hearing it.
Mr. Johnson: 28 ft. was the addition and there was 38 ft. available.
That would give us 10 ft. I never picked it up.
Mr. Sasser: The important thing for you especially is that the number
that you are requesting is not greater because then you still would have
to come back and do this all over again.
Mr. Johnson: I understand that. I also would like to submitt a letter
that we got from one of the other_ neighbors that said they would like to
be here, but they couldn't. Anyway, I just wanted to clarify that. The
intent was never to he 2 ft. off the property line, but to be 10 ft., you
know minimum 10 ft.
Mr. Sasser: I would like to read this letter into the record. The letter
is presented by Mr. Johnson, dated May 8, 1995, signed by John ROsSero
d Madaline Rossero. It is addressed to the Town of Wappinger Zoning
Board of Appeals regarding Appeal ##1200. "To: Zoning Board Members,
Having been notified by certified mail regarding Nicholas and Josephine
Johnson's request for a variance of Article IV, Section 421.6 at their_
property, located at 16 Gabriella Road, Wappinger Falls, N.Y. 12590. We
do not have any objection to their request as outlined in the notice
mailed to us and published in the Southern Dutchess News, May 3, 1995,
copy attached. You see my wife nor myself are able to attend the public
hearing scheduled for May 9th. Please accept this letter as our consent
to their request." Mr. Johnson, could I just ask you where their_ house is
in relation to ...?
Mr. Johnson: They are across the street.
Mr. Sasser: Directly across the street?
Mr.
Johnson:
Yes.
These are
the
folks that live
directly next door.
Mr.
Sasser:
To the
side where
the
addition would
be?
Mr. Johnson: John and Madaline live across the street.
Mr. Sasser: Could you just tell us what you name is, so we could have it
for the record?
.
Dinkel:
Sure, I
am Scott Dinkel and
my
wife
is Jacqueline Di.nkle.
Mr.
Sasser:
Did you
have anything that
you
would
like to address
n
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 1995
Page 5
uecifically with the Board or would you rather wait Did you have an
architect here?
Mr. Johnson: No, I don't have him here, but we are working with an
architect that is doing the plan.
Mr. Sasser: The architect is working with a plan that would stay within
the 10 ft. ..?
Mr. Johnson: Absolutely.
Mr. Sasser: I am sorry Mr. Dinkel. I didn't mean to interrupt.
Mr. Dinkel: That is o.k. I don't know what the procedure is. Do we talk
from here?
Mr. Sasser: It is only us here tonight. So, that would be fine if you
are more comfortable from there.
Mr. Dinkel: Nick and Joan, spoke to us about the situation and putting an
addition on. We provided our survey to help. We have some concerns
particularily the way the letter was written, but also that the property
hasn't been surveyed and we are not sure exactly where this structure is
going to wind up.
. Dinkel: Their property hasn't been surveyed.
Mr. Johnson: To try and alleviate that, and I recognize the concern, T
have ordered a survey. It will be done prior to any work and it is
obviously not a confirm that we are going to be inside the bound or
otherwise we will have a problem and we wouldn't proceed from that point.
Mrs. Dinkel: Our real concern is from looking at the site plan and
getting a copy of the site plan that was presented to you is that the
house is located as per owner on the property so you don't really know
exactly where it is from the property line and in fact how far they are
from the property line. That is why we are concerned with that as well as
if the copy that we got is to scale, their house shows that it is only 40
feet long. Ours is 46 and I think the majority of the houses are the
same.
Mr. Sasser: The ..... at this point would be to, correct me if I am wrong
Mr. Johnson, 10 ft. from the property line to the edge of the new
addition, wherever the survey shows your property line a variance would
not allow you to go any closer than 10 ft. from that property line.
Mr. Johnson: As I said, we are probably going to scale it back at least 2
more feet.
Mr. Sasser: But, at this point it is still 10 ft., correct? O.k., do you
lderstand what I am saying? They are doing a survey. No matter where it
slows their houses, they would still never be allowed to go any closer.
than 1.0 feet to the property Line.
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9; 1995
Page 6
Mr. Dinkel: When a builder builds it with 2 by 6 verses 2 by 4, and it
comes past that, without a survey how does that ...?
Mr. Sasser: The Building Department is going to require that they have
that and they will double check the measurements to insure from the actual
property line where it is surveyed that the new addition couldn't go any
closer than 10 feet to the edge. Would that address your concerns?
Mr.. Dinkel: It is certainly much better than the way the letter read. We
still feel that it is close. Nick talked to my wife and they talked about
another two feet and that comes closer to where we feel better about it.
Mr. Sasser: Let me ask you this, is there another way that you think that
screening or landscaping, that perhaps it could buffer it, if it would
make you feel more comfortable with it? Is that something that you think
that you could work out together?
Mr. Johnson: Absolutely, our intent here is not to ignore Scott and
Jacki_e's concerns because we think we have been good neighbors to each
other and we think their concerns were legit, absolutely.
Mr. Sasser: I don't know what kind of landscaping you have between the
houses.
Johnson: There is nothing there.
Mr. Sasser: But, if you are talking about landscaping to buffer between
the two, we certainly, if we were to grant this could put a requirement in
there that you buffer it, but it would be very difficult for us to say at
this point and time something that would be acceptable to both of you
because that could go on forever without you ever deciding ...
Mr. Johnson: I recognize that, but I think if I may, we have been able to
work together and that is what I think we are trying to do and I
appreciate them and I am glad they are here because I would rather have
them participate rather than have something done and then we have problems
later. I don't want any problems. I assured them that we are going to
make it two ft. less and we are going to change and move out two ft. the
other way. Hopeful, if you grant the 10 ft. variance we would be only 8
ft. That is what we are going to end up with.
Mr. Sasser: 8 ft. out?
Mr.. Johnson: We would use 8 ft. of the 10.
Mr. Patti: 8 of the 2.0.
Mr. Johnson: Right, I am sorry.
mr. Sasser: I want to make certain that we are still taking about a 10
%01- variance?
M
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 1995
Page 7
rIe. Johnson: That is correct. We will be inside it.
Mr. Sasser: You will be no closer than that?
Mr. Johnson: That is correct.
Mr. Sasser: That is the point. Are you comfortable with how that is? It
would be surveyed. No closer than 10 ft. from the property line as the
official survey would show and then the two of you would work out some
kind of vegetable buffer.
Mr. Levenson: Can I make a suggestion?
Mr. Sasser: Yes, Herb.
Mr. Levenson: Nick, when is the survey going to be ready?
Mr. Johnson: I talked to Gray, Railing & Heinsman. I talked to Bob Gray
on Saturday and I talked to the surveyor today. We probably won't get to
the point of construction until later this month because we will be away.
So, it works out that it will probably be ready sometime this month. I
couldn't tell you Herb.
Mr. Levenson: Can I make a suggestion, Mr. Chairman that you waive the
'fling date for 5 days until we see the survey and then we would file on
�biceipt of the survey?
Mr. Sasser: At this point I don't think that is necessary. It appears
that, and please I want you to speak up and correct me if I am wrong, it
appears that we are addressing your concerns and that you are comfortable
and you have been neighbors for a while. I don't see any point in
delaying it any further.
Mr. Levenson: I have a logistics problem. I am not going to be here for
the next few days.
Mr. Sasser: You are not going to be here tomorrow?
Mr. Levenson: I am not going to be here tomorrow, Thursday, or Friday. I
have enough time until next Tuesday.
Mr. Sasser: How about Monday?
Mr. Levenson: Next Monday or Tuesday.
Mr. Sasser: I don't have the ability to waive the filing. Under state
law it has got to be filed 5 days from the day of the decision. and I don't
want to do anything to jeopardize ..
Mr. Levenson:
r. Sasser:
it then.
We will have it filed on Tuesday in time.
Monday or Tuesday will be fine with me too, Herb. I can do
Mr. Levenson:
n
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 7995
Page 8
I will talk to Nick on Monday when I get back.
Mr. Sasser: Is there anyone else who would like to speak with regard to
this matter? Can I have a motion to close the public hearing?
Mr. diPierno: So moved.
Mr. Prager: Second.
Mr. Sasser: I would just like to say that I am certainly going to vote
ves for it. Number one, I think there is a definate need for this. I
don't think that it is really going to change the character of the
neighborhood. We heard from the nearby properties and the objections that
were voiced were addressed tonight. I don't think that it is going to
change the character of that neighborhood and I don't think that there is
any other way that you can do it based on his map and showing the
topography of the yard and the drainage problem that he has, that there is
any other way to do that. Based on those 5 .. I think that we should make
a motion to grant and I would entertain that.
Mr. Prager: I make a motion to grant that.
Mr. diPierno: Second.
)LL CALL Mr. Prager: Aye.
Mr. Sasser: Ave_
Mr. diPierno: Ave.
Mr. Sasser: It will be a late filing, but it will be filed within 5 days.
Herb, I really don't think I have the ability by law to ...
Mr. T,Pvenson: You have the ability.
Mr. Sasser: I have never read that anywhere. Everything I read said that
I had to file within 5 days. On for discussion tonight, is there anyone
here from Samanich? O.K., lets go out of order here. Guardian Self_
Storaaei Appeal #1202.
Mr. Levenson: Mr. Chairman, this is a variance to grant a 12% increase
for impervious area. I had discussions with Mr. Redl before he went to
Spain and we measure the entire thing out. He came back to me after the
third discussion and said to me that it would be very difficult to cut
down to 75% because it would impede the flow of traffic in and about the
storage area. That is the request.
Mrs. Redl-Daniel: He gave me 83% coverage.
Mr. Levenson: 87%.
Mrs. Redl-Daniel: I think he cut it back to 83%. He cut it back more,
R3% coverage and an 8% variance. What he did was he cut it back from the
nce and added trees.
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 1995
Page 9
e. Levenson: O.k., so it is now 83%.
Mrs. Redl-Daniel: We meet with him before he went away.
Mr. Sasser: You are now requesting an 8% variance?
Mrs. Redl-Daniel: An 8% variance and there is 83% coverage and we cut it
back_
Mr. Levenson: That will be so written in the legal notice.
DISCUSSION OF MAP
Mr. Sasser: What was the original approval for?
Mr. Levenson: The original approval was ...
Mr. Sasser: ... Did not take into account all of the paved areas.
Mr. Prager: For the other variance you mean.?
Mr. Sasser: Right.
Mr. Prager: Right.
Sasser: So, now you are coming back because there is more paved area
an what the approval granted_
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: Right.
Mr. Levenson: You are only allowed 75; and as you see this has been cut
back considerable over there on the original drawings and you note that
they put in the pine trees.
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: The only reason we kept black top here is because we
thought it would be cleaner. It wouldn't get so messy.
Mr. Sasser: So, the original map had black top all the way to here and
you now have --
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: Cut it back from there and we put in some trees.
Mr. Levenson: Cut it back to 83% and we will so note that when we do the
legal notice.
Mr. Sasser: Not the legal notice, but at the public hearing that you have
mitigate from the original ..
Mrs. Redl-Daniel: I think it was from 88 to 83.
Mr. Prager: Originally, I believe you have 87Y.
Mr. Levenson: 87%.
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9. 1995
Page 10
Mr. Prager: So, now it has gone to 835-1
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: We need to keep the area wide enough for the trucks.
I think too it was a concern. So, when we get the tractor trailers in
there and some of the larger Ryder trucks.
Mr. Levenson: I think Mr. Redl. will be back on Saturday and I will have a
conversation with him again.
Mr. Sasser: I think it is really pretty clear cut. I don't think that I
have any questions_
Mr. Prager: I don't either.
Mr. Sasser: I would like a motion to declare Lead Agency.
Mr. diPierno: So moved.
Mr. Sasser: Now, is this before the Planning Board already?
Mr. Levenson: This is before the Planning Board. The Planning Board will
hear it on Monday and they will hold it for the finality until. we get the
variance.
. diPierno: They are going to hear it Monday for the first time?
Mr. Sasser: They have been before the Planning Board before.
Mrs. Red] -Daniels: Yes.
Mr. Sasser: (The Planning Board has already declared Lead Agency.)
Mr. Levenson: It will be before the Planning Board for a public hearing.
They will hold the public hearing, the approval, until the variance has
been approved.
Mr. Sasser: I don't know if it is required, but I would still like to
Mr. Prager: I make a motion for a Negative Dec.
Mr. diPierno: Second.
Vote: All ayes_
Mr. Sasser: I don't think I have any questions. It looks pretty clear to
me. I do think that it is important at the public hearing that you lust
remember to bring out that fact even though it may be in the legal
notice. I think that is going to be an important
�,.,s. Redl-Daniels: I would say 83%?
Mr. Sasser: Yes, that you have made an effort to mitigate from what the
original proposal was.
4
Wappinger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 9, 1995
Page 11
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: So, what was concluded here tonight?
Mr. Sasser: We were looking to see if there was anything that we would
require of you at the public hearing so you would know to bring it in.
That is what a workshop is all about. Not to really try the issues, but
lots of times there is questions that we will have. Instead of at the
public hearing saying, you don't have all the information. Come back for
another public hearing.
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: This way you get it done.
Mr. Sasser: This way we get it all done and finished.
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: O.k., so I will just bring in more plans Monday night
then?
Mr. Levenson: Bring in 10 more sets of plans.
Mr. Sasser: Let me just ask one question with regard to drainage on this
property. I presume that you have catch basins?
Mr. Levenson: The Planning Board is taking care of that.
Sasser: I understand, but I want to know for my own knowledge because
think. this impervious surface is going to be an issue with perhaps the
public hearing and I want to know. Does it drain into holding ponds
around?
Mr. Levenson: Catch basins, I believe.
Mrs. Redl-Daniels: Catch basins, I think towards the front. That is
where everything else is anyway.
Mr. Sasser: Which would go to where?
Mr. Levenson: That goes into the storm drain up front.
Mr. Sasser: Which goes into where?
Mr. Levenson: It goes into the public drainage system.
Mr. Sasser: I guess my point is, is it going down the street?
Mr. Levenson.: It is not going down the street and it is not going onto
anybody elses property.
Mr. Sasser: It is sinking into the ground or is it going into ..?
Mr. Levenson: It is going into a storm water system.
Mr. Sasser: The storm water system goes into the creek. Am I correct?
Wappi.nger Zoning Board
Minutes - May 91 1995
Page 12
Mr. Levenson: It goes into the creek.
Mr. Sasser: It doesn't go into Tri -muni or anything _like that?
Mr. Levenson: No.
Mr. Sasser: Any other business before the Board tonight?
Mr. Levenson: Are you going to do Samanich?
Mr. Sasser: Have you spoken with him, Herb?
Mr. Levenson: Yes, I have spoken with him.
Mr. Prager: The only thing if you could Herb, if you would, I would like
to see some kind of a plot plan there.
Mr. Sasser: A 1 1/2 ft. plot plan. That is it.
Mr. Prager: That is all we will need.
Mr. Levenson: This is going to be for the 23rd.
Mr. Prager: Yes, but he is building something. He is removing a deck and
is replacing it with a new deck.
Mr. Levenson.: Right.
Mr. Prager: Motion to adjourn.
Mr. diPierno: Second.
Vote: All avec.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:55 P.M..
Respectfully submitted,
— �.�....« a.yaa�caa, "=c -L r- t-a� y
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals