983
.,
-, ~.
..,
~-.
TO\V~ OF \\APPL"'GER
~OTICE OF APPEAL
~
MAR 1 1 1987
.. It .~.
Home T\lailing
Add::ss R R 1, Old Route 9
Ayt:'~ ~o. ~~
D:ne-fPto . ~~, l S \{ 1
l(.~
Ap~llimt TEG Fede~al C~edit Union
Fishkill r N~w Yo~k
Zip Code: .., ~C;~4
914-
Td. #: 897 -qOSQ
TO TIrE nOARD OF APPEALS:
For the above
I, Philio A. Ce~niolia as A~chitect ,appe:LlfromadecisionoftheZorunglnspecror,c:lted
J ~. '2lv . 19..1l. , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appe:ili for: ~ A \~lANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT. :J AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO:--lING ORDINANCE. 0 AN APPE.-\l. AS A."'l
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~ ~ 1 n 1'; RT:~. 9
- , urrecl6: no.)
HB-2A ,19-615-602-793743 . Town ofWappinge:, N.'Y.
IUllU1lg CISl.) U,:nO nc.,
- .
" ~. . .....
1. PROVISION(S) 01=THE;ZONING ORDINANCE~P~EALEI:? A~ti cle ~409..."5:"To-ALLOW ro~,AN
-. ~ -'.. - . "--"" . ... .. -. -:, . "--',""'" ,. "-~ . ..:: -:--~ ~;'~':JJ , _,'::___~-.._ ~--.r
AREA- VAR*ANCEFOR A 45 FOOT~ .FRONTYARD,;;.-SETB-A€:K ..wHE~S:FEET ,IS REQUIRED -ON~GTh NON....-com:ORMING
-- " .-----. --~;
shown on sketch;~ (:ll'IICIC. 5C'C:1I0n or 5UD\eClIon:InO PV:I!U'lphj BUILDING.
2. 1YPE OF APPEA..L (Complete relevant se:-Jon)..
2.. A W'..RIA."lCE IS B.EQUESTED forthe following re:lSons: Area va~iance-see enclosed letter.
1) Strict :lppliotion oj the Zoning Ordir.:mce would produce undue hardship bec:lUse:
'-.-
'2) ,Tne hardship cre~ted is unique and is not shared by:ill properties :ilike in the ~mmedi::.te vicinity of tllis prope0'
. and in trjs district oe'"'..:luse: '
. 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not chan~e the ch:lrace: of the ilistrict
-J
be--...::.use:
b. A S?ECL-\L L'SE PER..\!IT IS REQUESTED pursldm to art::!e , se-...~ion or subsec-Jon
· p:lr2gr~ph of the Zoning Ordir:~,m:e to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. IN 1 =.RPRETATION of the Zoning Orciir:ance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) ~n :lppe::l.i is requested be'"...:luse:
;l. OTHER REM-\RKS:
See enclosed lette~.
(Use extr:l sheets if necessary)
Si~Otcr,~~
As Agent
A~chitect
· Tne required pian must accompany the Notice cf Appe:Ll.
.A2PELL.~~'TS ARE RESPONSiBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIR~D LEGAL
!,-'OTlCE IN THE LOCAL Nl:. \VSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACfION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 983
Dated March 11th. 1987
Appellant TEG Federal Credit Union
Fishkill, NY 12524
At a meeting ofthe Zoning Board of Appeals on March 10th ,1987, Appeal No. 983
was considered and the following action on the request for: U A VARIANCE. 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI'f. 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship forthese reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
Address R. R. 1 - Old Route 9
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
"
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change th:- character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variancen be granted 0 -be-denied and that the prevfous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 ~fifmea !Xl be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INfERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation ofthe Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S... hy resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
f!Fr- ~~~"/.......,
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
~.
Page -2-
March 11th, 1987
At the March 10th, 1987 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Cortellino made a motion that the variance be granted. I would
require screening, especially on the parking side. I would like it to be uniform.
Want the screening to be high enough to ensure the privacy on the South side.
The screening shall be at the same grade as the parking lot, 6 foot high, double
screen.
Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion.
Vote:
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mrs. Roe - aye
Mr. Fanuele - aye
Mr. Cortellino ~ aye
The motion was carried.
[!rr- -:;?{'''''' -~,-~.
George Urciuoli, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
GU/lb