922
;c. y:
cc~,J
TO\VN OF ":APPL'lGER
NOTICE O:F APPEAL
.~
SEPJ 11 \1986
Appeal No.
Date .4l1.<s
qd-~
%- L l<1 Kb
APpellan~~tD~ \~'K-S
~~~'L{LL- ~y '--D~0b
TO TIrE BOARD OF APPEAlS:
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Home t\ tailing L .1 ,
Address o~ s ltU~a\J Q.,\)
Zip Code: ~D~"h Tel.#:(q~-fa5#
I, '~(\.:)AGQ '1")\ E'\2...\CS ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
A lL ~ % , 19~ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for:~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ""lODLE'(6L)St\. 12.\)
. *- (street & no.)
l-t'R:> - \ A G \ S, - 0""2.. {,o 8"~8 S
(wrung dist.) (gnd no.)
Ar11de..- ~.I ~ ~
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED 11 G I. S-Z
<8T'AP\)\~~ "Sl<AU 'b~f-\LL- ~ \=D€' CL6~6Q. ~-t\\j
t\ ~ ~"\- ~~ (aruclc. scctlon or sub~lIon and paragraph)
2. TIPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
, Town of Wappinger, N.'Y.
A '"f ~ 5"~ t~t);t. -G. _
......,rll( ~
GO - 0 .. t~/ .
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: 1)lS\A \..lee ~~'V\..
-e'of't\) l,UOOL-'\) mA.\<..'6 \:)\'2S-\D~'( 'Sl~~ l)P~f\QPt~l..5 - LE'A\J'\~t,- --=\7
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this properry
and in trus district because: o""tl.\t:.~ S\..(AOs::. \ ~ ~€ \. ~\6<e...'S.e.C\\O {\j \)D \()6\"
6~'S~ -rttl~ <[x;\" <bf\C~ ~QO\(2.GX'<\.S-'W\
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the ch~cter of the district '
because. ~6'S\<A~ l ~ cot\ ~~ \D \lH5 q?00~\) tt DtSUl"l,\Di? 'D
. ~ 6lJ~<t\\X..G ~t. v~\}JQ~P\~. l\ La...)CO~ ~C\ ~G
b. A SPECL<\L USE PER.\HT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article . section or subsection ~~ <;~.' y
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the \ X\J ~~
, ,
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signat~ (9-)-: (~
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
!\OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
"'.
. ..,.--. .:: .
'. '. ~.:'.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS:
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 922
Dated September 10th, 1986
Appellant Ronald Dierks
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address
34 Steuben Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on September 9th ,1986, Appeal No. 922
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the.
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
';..";.; ......
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 96.-gf-aRWd [] be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer lKl be confirmed 0 be-revmed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution ofthe Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
rrl;V~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
.'
Page -2-
September 10th, 1986
At the September 9th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Urciuoli made a motion to deny the requested variance. There was
no hardship demonstrated and there are other alternatives.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - nay
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
The motion was carried.
fh./;V~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb