949
.. (,'. ' . ~N~~j(l/Yf20
~~,:-1" -. TO\VI\ OF\\:.\PPL'\'GER ~ ~ APP~!\:O.
~ ~ r\OnCEOF AI'PEAL \f\9.^J Date\Y. (~f
QuO
:::: ") ((\
-
1''- ,,":d
! --I I J'-f
Appellant
(Y) f!. f ,j AS0iJ 1)1 BL I'll A
Home ~tailing
Address 'ROB. i l~':<1': ',,- rJ
w' F rJ,Y
./
Zip Code: 1-15<1 (i
Tel. #: ~lJL,.- 1-4t~
TO TIlE nOAIU> OF APPEALS:
I. ;~t' VI' f1.,./6u,- , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
91 :L3 , 19...Kf-, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~a:: s/<n ~.7L[
(street &. no.)
l?,)Sl ... 04- Ci coo~g , Town of Wappinger, N.\:
(god no.)
~-40
(zorung dlst.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED A-r-tldc -n:- <;(c-n;"", 4-:.?l --tu c; Il("~j
--n"c. ~~~\C'NCL- / ,/ G2.~/-h-h~* ;:' O(LI,.{lCNv\ OVI ~ \~(;1'\!L hl "J,+ L---1tt~ 4 4'':'':-hC1;~
I' , \of r . (artlcl~,' SectlO or sub~t1o'n and para!Uaph)
reA,,""...........?' v..>\~-t:.' '::)D -~ l~ \--ec v\H~f.
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant s~ion). *
a. A V.;\RIA.NCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance \vould produce undue hardship because: Ste,; (rtt\V~C
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: '$ (e. (~thJ,...:~v
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
. lL r n
because. ~(v c~ W^i.AJ.&i:
b. A SPECL-\L USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. D'i'TERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
T
APPELLA."ITS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
~OTlCE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
"-
ZOl\TJNG BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. q4q
Dated November 'irrl r 1 QAf,
Appellant Mr. 1<' 1::l"nn ni P:Alma
WaDpin~~r 1<'",11", NY 12590
Address
Robinson Lane
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 14Tn t1986 tAppealNo. q4q
was considered and the following action on the request for: !Xl A VAR!ANCEt 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCEt 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)t was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Boardt it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinancet because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use districtt because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the districtt because:
Thereforet it was further determined that the requested variance ij! be granted 0 ::b:e::denied-and that the prevfous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be-eeRfifflHlEllXl be reversed.
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be deniedt pursuant to article t section or subsection t paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance andt therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
fh-//J~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
-
Page -2-
November 3rd, 1986
At the October 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Urciuoli to grant the requested variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
fh-Ij/J~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb