969
I it
."
"
{v
.
AP~llant~~~
1frl.::;fue:/.- /)1 fJ-
TO ~~F APPE.y;S,: .. . /. (J
~ ~ ~
I, vt- ~ , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
. 19_, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0 A VARIANCE, ~
SPECIAL USE PERM 11: 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 1.-3 ~ ~
t 1)- 5" tI (stree[ &. no.)
o . (~- 03 - 11-2. 04 . Town of Wappinger, N.'Y.
(wrung dl5t.) (gnd no.)
TO\VN OF ":APPL~GER
NOTICE OF .APPEAL
~APPeal No. .-9l fi q
FEB 1 2 198Vate Dnu o{ S+ J \ q <( l 0
.. .. -.
HomeM~
Address L3 'A'--~_
Ql.cf{ 6 _
Zip Code: ;AsftJ Tel.#: f59 /
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINA..l\ICE APPEALED
(article, sealon or sub~tlon :lnd para!lf'lph)
2. TIFE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
3. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this properry
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
~
b. A ~~ECLo\L USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article:LJL-- , section or subsection
rr4 5 . paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises: ~ ~. .
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zonin~ orlance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Sigr"ture~ ~
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
T
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
!'-:OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER,
..
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACIlON ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 969
Dated February 11th, 1987
Joy & Isadore Erreich &
Ap~llaIl!_ June Visconti
Addr~s 13 Joan Lane
12590
At a meeting ofthe Zoning Board of Appeals on February 10th, 1 '-": , 1987 , Appeal No. 969
was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE, ~ A SPECIAL USE PERMI'f. 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
. not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and that the prevfous
. decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution ofthe Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit !XI be
granted 0 1:uH;l@al€Q, pursuant to article IV , section or subsection 445 , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be ! c;vel :oed- U be confirmed, because:
SEE ATTACHMENT.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
f!:!Fr- ~~....,
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
.
'..
Page -2-
February 11th, 1987
At the February 10th, 1987 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Cortellino made a motion to grant the Special Use Permit.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Roe - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
~ ,....-;;7./"\ '-,
~1'- ~tPe~.,.,-~
"
George Urciuoli~ Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
't' ':".
GU/lb