950
.-
TOWl'i OF \\"-PPL'\GER "udPpeal No. q c::;c
NOTICE OF A.PP~""~"""''''~ V Date~'1 . 01~c\41.-
N D Ij 1. ,i 1986
RAtHE H, SNOW~~X~I~A~" e /~ r 1-/ '// P ( ~1.:('
\"'--""1 .
,"-{ '-." \....1"
. ,.
,
. ,
s~
Appellant _PA (;1 L
bL 'l,t!
!l n r); ~ 1"f: t', ;)
, v
C 4- R~ l L
AI V<
Zip Code: (:J.r 90
Tel. #~1-C;"2' ;;31 (;.
TO TIIE nOAJU) OF APPEALS:
I, /'.:: (', I (~. ~ '.:( r--F~ II , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
.Fe r t- Z~ , 19G-'&- ,and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: B"A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connectipn with premises located at 10/ ft...e..:. f ~'.. It.~ /' /' ,A t'Efd-
lo - rt ' & ?"7 o:..f:' i..f, 70(,;J.. t.j J.y (streel &: no.)
I" -/"1,., , /"" 1 ....
A - ~ /.-) J [) ~ uLf "7()Co-i:'; '7 ,L;1J(u.C' J...., t Town of Wappinger, N.'Y.
(ZOl'Wlg 0151.) (&no no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OFTHE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED 4 /1 i,t'"~/~" 71-7 S:~~(' /;~ 11!~ ~
./ -'. /' "-
/ C!' ' ) C -I' .., ''&:- /) ..AI '1~ c-,' !:I e'" '."., .. -J'.
(aruclc. section or subsccuon and paralUaph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
a. A V..o\RIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Stri~ app.lication of the Zoniry.g Ordinance would ~ro~h::~e un_~ue hardship because: I'r- i e V' e-.,c I <s ~::'7) c_ 'i'
oj 1'1'l.--€..se Ie tS' 70 ,3 It ~-~-lz...;'n'9 /--C/.-Cvs
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this properry
and in this district because: 1~C7 i.J <f~.(,\',t--r-..:.f ~X't ,. t-. A-) A c-n.! "--nf~8 (.J..'-$ <:.A#ytj .. /
7)L~ tll;-ea l-J..'t1S' 'o4..f' 9"\""":;'~ -tel 'is !{- v " 8#er- ~o[-j' we.-e. fY ..l i-chasf-<:l, ,
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: l"h-<e:~ \'~.a- 10 "rf ZJ f" se j y d ~ L'-elD(J~" A-e "; ,,-..if-"'" ('of: 1 .3 f"e
(J'2Y.....l)'}/-tt-f.d ~ i/,...c:. ~n.'E:_~
b. A SPECLo\L USE PER..\lIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
SigTlarure
j;-' k';
~/ /1 //
~,.:t..l.
)~\
---- '....- - ' -
r .._-. D...cJ-
(7 (!_
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELL.A~NTS ARE REsp6NSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
950
Dated November 19th. 1986
Appellant
Panl Garel1
Address -1fueeler Hill Road
Wappinger Falls. NY
12')90
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on November 18th ,19 86 ,AppealNo. 950
was considered and the following action on the request for: XX A VARIANCE, ::J A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would LJ would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
..
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be-grftflted Xl be denied and that the previ"ous
decision of the Enforcement Officer KX be confirmed 0 ee'feYel'se6. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation ofthe Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
~t~::::~APP~
Fage _
~ovembe= l~:h, 1986
At the ~ovember 18th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appcc:5, a motion
~as made by ~ir. Landolfi to deny the requested variance as sub~itt:~ 5:~ce what the
appellant :s seeking is not what we have before us, it is not the 5a=:.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
\'ote:
~~. Caballero - aye
~~. Cortel:ino - aye
~~. Urciuo:i - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
1h-1/J~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb
