925
'.. c . . TOWN OF \\l\PPli'iCER 'fl ~~~I~Xppeal NO"o
l ~ NOTICE OF APPEAL I UUV'-/~$" Date ft,,]
n~-
'1 - ~_...,
'I /(' 5/ "
, ': ! I Iv
Appellant :S'bj[)t'"'\i-{._:~:-til,-\ ftvh,'( h
\It ()', r S.(~ (UC\
I - I ..
TO TIlE nOARD OF APPEALS:
Home ~ {ailing ~ -It ' ,,/
Address '- 7.""' I JrI,':2,f1~) r I At
Zip Code:
/<.:? CHI
Tel. #: ,..;1.~ ~)-"51)~
I, ~,:Sjf.'( It n+ (;~+i'h j.-J::i.-Ll..li'r h ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
,A-nq 1/ , 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of AppeaJ..s for:[lj A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OFTHE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at If Nt/nThl? t iJ}
(street & no.)
R-Ljo
(wrung dist.)
&: 3::>J- -c. 3 - JC; l.J U.-:> q
(gno no.)
,Town of Wappinger, N.Y
1. PROVISION(S) OFTHE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED f=h?. -h'c k -nL. <)c(~+'(rn Yli s-: 3
1{-"I ,..lb LA. ~ ({ r L {'~ '),V \ I C"f/vi-.')'\jI ,("~I i / n Cif\ c?4 i"\ t-)Aq (/fl! ,rme Ii' -k'') Cr:\ (I; h /','\':\ (,{7 ;"'-c
-HI c..... who h' (c k t, +-: Ow....: IX nf..l ~arllcle. section or sub~llon 3nd p3ragraph) , b
r --\- --, 1~ ....h.:: t3"'ir'S. t) let 4.5 ."'C-Cj (.. I/W '-t ~ 20Vl i'~ L':,:C'...(
2. TIPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the L;oning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: ~ 0;.:; 1L:",,'rw, ~ " b" It-
P(~cf +C"'r-f-.Ji. """rt..l:- '-Ie:> L.<,;;:-e.. 1~"e4, IT wC,,'ICl Pi!. c.,-ht't-rcts.nIP c,.., CL',- "'-oY),~ 'IL ~r'-l t~~:,.S
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this properry
an. d in this district because: .4n a.tll..LI ti,,'l') IN.'';;' be; It p.-/~/~__+t:;. (~1 (Y)t?rl...:.r~-?(I.....'qn,;'~ .'''rd.A'ro....t1u.~.
o l~qVl i"'i~ p_p('~; ., U hc.:.s ,~,;;. r (.A"\..L-~-,,-d ~ S' c::..~v't- +-t~ /')~v:.k,. /-> ~:-r'1 ' . .
~ ~, tt"..n I-L ~~r c" ...;,r:y, 'l'rl /1..... C c"f1~- f';c.y~ f4 (:>1) If't.('ll~.d. (I. t T'lla~ t1 tYu;" I /'1.... ~-= I ~ ....:. II' ljl..:\::
__ 3) The variance woUld oDserve t e 'spuit' of the Orainance and would not change the character of the district '
because: A~S<N""iA-p.".....-\-rtu...\t~ v.r<...",'JG"--fY),!teal~"-- -rh...:2.....5r~--h.cpL,.rp0{j~ f-.=;<'!.i!oc...:
--hiL hm, I..{ ,,, S pc L{~ C,;.~S ft:; j...J?,.,YI/ri 1\ f-cc/c-:hu:../' L'\S "-'':'' ".....,.S h -h.:: cI. c
b. A SPECL<\L USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary) SigI1alUre
~ A
.. :?J. .U~.
./ {!ddi<<1a.0<<:".L
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLA.~S ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
t\OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 925
DatedNovember 3rd, 1986
Appellant Steven & Cathy Habich
Yonkers. NY 10704
Address
56 Hildreth Place
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Oc.toh~r 1 L.t'n. ,19 86 , Appeal No. 925
was considered and the following action on the request for: Rl A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
lJ';"TERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. vARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 ee-gamean be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0. be confirmed 0 .ee-fe-vefsed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
f/~/;OJ~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
.
Page -2-
November 3rd, 1986
At the October 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Cortellino to deny the requested variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
fjr/;V~~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb