958
....
TO\\'1' OF '\APPI:\GER
~OTICE OF APPE.AL
J~
,UtHI H. SNOWDEN
Home i\ tailing .-j ) . r
Address / c">'- f:.. V _\) C" L L
G~~
Appeal 1\:0. ,- "-
Date 0 L-C . ~ ~ ~ IC:;C{t..r
Ll~
I .1 I I
Appellant !-II ~.'.2,', IN! ,:+.()() - r-~'.( L /--j +1 fi l/ ",'
l\ '~f fiN &' f2- F ~ L s- I \/. '-/ '
TO TIlE nOAill) OF APPEALS:
. I
\\ (11 l .'-- ^ )/~ l. v
\I)'; 1),,)./(1/\ (11).( .fav':>. /-;2 jl1..vlc-Jf' M . ( , , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, (bted
./ 000 o~t2-:J-o , 19...5.L.., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for:){6 A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINfu~CE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at J~\ f.2u \ 'C L..L (12 17 , i./.,./ f
. ---c. ,r _' c""\DC.2 (strect&no.)
G.;{\1(ltA.Ue-t.. f pU..___ <;. ) q -L 1-.' J (-o,+- b ,-"oJ- 1...:x , Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(zorung dlst.) (grid no.)
i...iJ
r
Zip Code: /.-1-j'J ()
. )C---Cj4
Tel. #: (.Ie..,) I , \
~\KV(."$ Sw\\o'\J 411.13 . \1.) \L.\,~
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED sa r I< ,L f-'~&-wA.r~r~ r /'k,-zer::
~ I~~S. ?f'ii ~ .r:' jI i ~lI\l~ ~-z..,'V\~\ ,:'f'-i PI I'\N~[~<;t"l-@ VITI wtlG1Z-C l'1"\.;' .:.,,..IN\:3P 0~
~-r'C-C-.I./-+--L"'o'-"{
/ .f'L ~...- N'f' ';').'Lo-.G .~ ....J! fl ' (arude.,sa:t,on or sub-;ectlOn and para!Uaph)
"7T1'v \Ai \ (..~... h'-V,~, -l rJ \)}1)\"'vd"4 ~ l.o'"l
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: - . f.v- ( IV
'1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce und.ue hardship because: ~ -/J) ~ VljC( <lit> . r ~
----CO/Z-1G'?~ D F <)Pr-I--~ I NC i.-v-9/II;/&- A-L--C- (pf?-\>QelLl'-z QW ~.;k ~ we 1.J()c..U-:. PL-~"--"I
(2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the i~~~ ~infty J tllls propert'j
V and in this district because: -r~ (..e'\ E:1-b-re~ ~j2-\,-,~ 1'> .z,.t;tJ\rv:.... ,')s f\ Sf: r,'h'2,+-ttL u.~ t wthv\\ v-l".........~) \; ~
la-\I,,\ol.\:;. 'f,'\"'" r'\ (l<''''"H'V\ ,1' \ f V-il,; \+flY C'^"" v~'"V\~ ~\,... \"1
@J The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: ~[:.S\OW~1); f-tYt' r~.....q\"~,., \rV ~ \)1c,,1\z..\v'\.
b. A SPECL-\L USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article
, section or subsection
, paragraph
of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS: 41 L".v ~ (\ta.d..~ L.o,. / V /13 u lee (,p I2>L (kS "'=<> (Pi
l'---e.N) 7-i> M . N & fr l> '"", "-'L ~rJ "-- 0",,", 71 ~ s Iv f6 A- f,...: I... () /NO L." (. !
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Sigoature ~.... '- ~/=//.L /? .
~~ ) ~'---- \
. The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
f\;OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
o:y-,.:
ZOl\1:NG BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 958
Dated January 5th, 1987
Appellant Frank & Larraine Hamlin
WRppingpy ~~"C, NY l?Sqn
Address
12 Russell Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on December 23rd, ,19 86 , Appeal No. . q'lR
was considered and the following action on the request for::rn A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
., :.;.::'
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 ee-Eieffied and that the previ'ous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 ~eeMtPmed XX be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
-
fh.//V~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
January 5th, 1987
At the December 23rd, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board
was made by Mr. Landolfi to grant the requested variance.
quite a unique hardship and since the property in question
without the variance.
of Appeals, a motion
There is a hardship,
is, lets say no value
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
fh-/IV~.,
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb
-