919
c
L0~
TO\VN OF "j\PPL'IGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date
lYJ IJ/?C.llf? [.1
Appellant R ,e-HAteD Kat? It{ iSKiG"
LvAPPIN6-ctC.S FI7l.-LS I iJtj
TO TIrE BOARD OF APPEALS:
Home l\tailing
Address IV O. Fo w Lf:.t2. 1-10 ~SE. R. j)
Zip Code:
I ~5 90
Tel. #: 0197- &.o5~
I, ' appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
~\J\. '1 7..-8 , I9~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI1: 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at
_ (street & no.)
-r ....'Z.v ..-WS.C\ - 0 L{ - S to (;) ~ 4 S- , Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(wrung dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S)OFTHEZONINGORDINANCEAPPEALED~d{; $ Sec...~ 4-2.\ -to a-\\.-w
d-. ~ vl wJM \~ 5~ vJ w
2. lYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: -
Qj)st,rict appli.cation of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: ~oL. 'j. ~
/~ ~ M...1O {p-7 l/W. -
(j) The hardship created i{iniqu~ and is dt shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
. and in this district because: c-"v:-/~ ~ ~ -~ f(',jD q ~
~d/U>WU<1 ~~, U .
@ The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordi.nance and would not change the character'of the district '
because:/~cL ~ AA ~ (l ac:t.oW :Tc,~
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
. The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
~OTlCE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
.~:.
'. I ~. -:-.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 919
Dated September 15th, 1986
Appellant Margaret & Richard Koriniskie
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Addr~s North Fowlerhouse Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on September 9th .19 86 , Appeal No. 919
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI'f, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance. because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the.
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
..." ;.~:'. ..
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance IK1 be granted 0 be-denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be wtlfirmed Kl be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article . section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By r~olution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
1h-!jJJ~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
.
Page -2-
September 15th, 1986
At the September 9th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Urciuoli to grant the requested variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Hirkala.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - abstain
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
The motion was carried.
fh-/;V~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb