842
'..
~~lvyJ tl/Y(ZV G - -
-Y\ ~ , ~)' Appeal No.' U ~
\ \jLNV Date~C 1:)+ \ q I c,\:V
- \
\ -~ , r~TO\Vl" OF \':.\PPL'\G~
~~ J-;OTICE OF APPEAL .
Appellant
JtR~LUlf~f
LA TLf 4;./)
Home r-.lailin~ I ,<- -,')
Address ( ht. /t;(a f'
Zip Code: /,[ 5ti ()
Tel. #:B3/-17'1'?
TO TIIE nOAlID OF APPEALS:
I, ,J ( f R Ld 1t7~ L,4 7 f/t}!II/ , ;lppeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
't - If>, 19...fL , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 11 A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at eAe,ls~o 12"0
I (stree[ &. no.)
~ZO \C 05(... - 0 , - "2. '" z.. 5D 5 ,Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(wrung diSl.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED -{W."T\L "e- ~ S~L.Il(v-.5 ~-l- \
111 0. \\OW ~- ~ ~lA\ ~&~ (l~~(-t {-o..r ~ So ~ ~~ WI""tV\ G. \ ~l cO< ~e+ kl..
.' ." ., /- ._ '_ rfl \ ., (arl1c1e. section or sub~l1on and para~aphJ
~~ t/';' 1\ \-€~ vU.\-cx.' -
1
2. 1YPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. AY.A.RIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: ~ 7A 12 f&tlSM' Ie
(1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because"-t?/tI~/"''''-1 ~()T il1~ '5cIQ~
. ~/~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of tlus property
and in this district because: 'fA ( t l' -r (L-irh5l/f1#l7/DN
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: Sohl< unITS {Jilt' f€~~""/~J
b. A SPECL-\L USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
Sigl1arure Q Q 1tt~/~"U
U
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
-I ~u-;IJJlr\
APPELLANTS ARE REsp6NSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
:'1
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
942
Dated November 3rd. 1986
Appellant Geral ilinp T.:lt"l""m
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address Chelsea Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Ol"t"nl....,l'" lL,t"r ,19 86 , Appeal No. q4?
was considered and the following action on the request for: rn A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
ll'-'TERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 .ee~amea [5B be denied and that the prevfous
decision of the Enforcement Officer:D be confirmed 0 be-r-eYef5ed. SE
E ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. ll\'TERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
1b,I;V~--
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
November 3rd, 1986
At the October 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Urciuoli to deny the requested variance. The applicant did not show any
sufficient hardship.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
fl--r/;V~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb