Loading...
935 . ~~ ((/<1{~fd- -, .- , TOWN OF WAPPINGER lrf~) ,APpeal No. '-1 -::> " ~ NOTICE OF APPEAL ij lJ...VVDate X-- - / ~- - <5, ? Appellant P-k ,/i I'~I , -+ j:J- V7 /7 " ??'~" ,- TO THE ~ARD O~PEALS: I, >:- ~ ~ VI B- __ / 6' , 19U, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for:. r]' A yARlANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, tQ1 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS ~ AGGRIEVED PERSON(S){check proper one), in connection with premises lOOl1ed at I /3 ~;"?11 yff /I / / CJ. . i J (stteet & no.) ~-40 , [,05'- ()~ r;?q07T;t ,TownofWappinger,N.Y. (zoning dist.) (grid no.) ... '?i Home Mailing / ....' ') Address 1/35j;}. /~1}-/ ;<JJj Zip Code: /(r). S7C Tel.#:~/-* [y ; appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated 1. PROVlSION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ..Br+dc~ 9> Ct. d'" 4- ~i 'lD" \ \ov-.l T'k/'/ L~o '- \ G !) ;..~) ~(\~ (article. section or subsection and paragraph) 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).'" a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: /"i))Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: :r T We 1/ .../1 (?(e'.M,j J,I ""'~/"1'f oll;Lj)ttt'Il,' t:t'lt J'r.j- cR;,tC;i/CG;tr ,,,Jt 11N'1'1 TV Ct,.,;I,ft!/i'"v1. ,'",.<.,'p'"'" ,/ 7P~ ftlR/tf/4oltl-/-a-'c/, ,.' 2)';The hardship cre;1ted is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the lmmediate vicinity of this property L/ and in this district because: ~.. r HM ~ Oft''' !J e; ;,,"' T(' IMv ~ 11.19 t' p 4', , '" lit',,, a", f' (flA"",'r" / 1 1'111 C f-/,Lc",ef'/'^ n?75. . LJ): The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because' rf./of' wAltf,.;T r::,tpo ~,v/"f)-t'A "cA~;4t:Nf/Aj;t'/C4;t.7"V;("e!'- L;"'.> {...,l-t'4L.. Ol c- . ~ ultll'l-!.ll,d_ 4- I? e J' : cP P;tI r'- ctC. 1'4J/~/I 7' .( J . b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ' section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: ') i \ \~ d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: #"'Arnrl(r 1)0< T .rA~ / ''/ {ul P i'~.P""'.q lit 7 P//J f 17~1l/(' 4J /",/ No.f.TtJ \' Ct'u/ f (; f//r /O*i:1,f /) u r' vr t/1lJ~jr-f -/./ /'" / 7#01 $1.. prk' 3. OTHER REMARKS: -r1-N~~ (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature ~ t.L~~ ... The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER ACflON ON APPEAL Appeal No. 935 Dated November 3rd, 1986 Appellant Fr'lTJ""r(l A T ""TJrpn("p Wappinger Falls, NY 12590 Address 13 Stonykill Road - RD 1 At a meeting oftheZoning Board of Appeals on October 14th, ,19 86 ,AppealNo. 935 was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI'f, ~ AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN .1l...PPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARlAbK..'E:.By resoiudon of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would not produce lli"1due hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ~'.. -.".... ... b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properti.es alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confIrmed 0 be reversed. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning . Ordinance as requested in your appeal: Pigeons are not in the Zoning Ordinance, therefore, they are not allowed. 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution ofthe Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: ~/;V~ Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals