932
'.
TO\VN OF "APPlL'iGER
..
~ NOTICE OF APPEAL
"\f) ~__..1 Appeal No. ~?;;t
~ ~r.,D Date B-1 ~ ~I lq~
OCT 2',4 1986 ~ .
~~b~1-.~~ S4n '}!JQAl, .
Address _ . ~ ~
Zip Code: )d~q 0 Tel. #~h;)-J.f9b?-
s
TO THE BQAJU) ~Ppr..s:
: '. --I: ~ "cJ-._ . appeal from a decision of the ZO~g Inspector, dated
. ()t.1.:3J .t!.d.- . I9~. and do herebyapply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ VARIANCE. 0 A
SPE CIAL USE PERMIT. 0 AN INTERPRITATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. ~EAL if ~
AGGRIEveD PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~g) rJ\~ .
H. \0 Co (,e t. <&"0.'
-l.. , ' b65 1-C>'3 ~ I 'd-S 4 ,Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(zorung dISl.) (gnd no.)
~;\Lt~ 4: U - Ac.uS)(I::~,
:\-
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED M G,te $
~6 ~ ~ 0\ llW -t-J'
t~ !'nft'~ :12- o.vv--Ui ~ (arll~Se\:t1on;'::lionand~agr;:" 'tfteJ?
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)~ ~ ~
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: J .
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinanc, would produce u.ndue harcjsIW becaUse: ~ at)' ~
~ ~aI\L ./l'W pJAPJflMJ ,.w....~ (YlljtRtJ\.
. 2) ~ardship ~ted is u;tiq~e:JlSnotsh cd ~ ro er~ :~mmtete;~ Ofthis,mOpe~
.~s=ecaused - .-ww-'D ~M~~~'
3) The varian.:nw~.uld/~e tp;?<'pirit of the Ordinanc'e',;I~_oul'!.'.:~t.;;~~'1 ~h~. ct;;Ja~ $. :hP'distri<;9. 1_/ .
because: pull Afla~ ~D.J # Q/\...- "f LA}H,\ CJ'-"Vl \"V~ 17 ~ i:iJ CJlCf/'C/
b. A SPECL~ USEPER..vHT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article\\[ . section or subsection
-0 d.. f . paragraph 9 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises: " ; M ~
. AG N(S) anapp~~u ed be<fflU,ssee:: ,$" n.-In -;b:J --.J1'tAJ yt ~ ,q"lIlOnAAf11A~
(,Jw- fl71JA A'VYl ctu"iMb O1cf~ . 'O'I'v," -.-
~~fRERRE ' :' '
~~; :t:::;;e~r:L:LMl i ~~-~ );,~
~ (Use extra sheets I! necessary) .. Si~"ature ~ r
fjfJ.JlltJ^- ~ -A/'I'- .~CiM cb . -tiJ . ~ ~
. The required plan must accompany the NOliee of Appeal. ~ 7b<> ~ ~
~
"
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
" '
~
,
:;1
.~.:'
.. .......
" f ~.'~"
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 932
Dated October 24th, 1986
Appellant Michael Lynch
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address 2 Spring Hill Court
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 14th, ,19 86 ,AppealNo. 932
was considered and the following action on the request for: KI A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
I
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
".. ~:.
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 OO-gr.aR;OO 0 be denied and that the previ'ous
decision of the Enforcement Officer !Xl be confirmed 0 ge-I=CW~. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
1/-r/;v~~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
October 24th, 1986
At the October 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board
was made by Mr. Urciuoli to grant the requested variance.
they pose no problems, they are not kept out all day long
kept inside. Grant with following conditions:
of Appeals, a motion
The dogs are well kept,
on a leash, they are
1. If one dog does pass away, it is not replaced, it is kept at 2 dogs.
2. There continue to be every effort made to keep the dogs on their property,
and quiet and at 5:00 A.M. the dogs be kept quiet.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - nay
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - nay
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was denied.
f/rrld~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb