937
'"
TO\VN OF ":.\PPL.'\GER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
~D APpealNO.~
Date.&.(0* \ \~ \ q C{(P
OCT 2-4 1986 I
~"-a~
Ap~ll~t Thomas J. Morley Jr.
~mithtown Rd., Fishkill, N.Y.
TO THE BOARD OF APPEAlS:
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Home r-..lailing
Address RD 1, Box 133,
Zip Code: 1 2524
Td.II:896-5857
s
. I.
Thomas J. Morley Jr. . ,appeal from a decision of the Zorung Inspector, ~ted
Sent. 8 ,19~. and do hereby Olpply to the Zoning Bo::u-d of Appeal.s for: gg A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERNlrr. 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises locOlted Olt Smi thtown Rd. Box 133
<0 ca. - (strCCl.kno.) (Schlicter
1-- uO ~/.s-~-O""2...- '109'1-'2.- ,TownofWappinger,N.Y: Private Rd
(wrung dlSt.) (grad no.)
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoriir1~ Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature d!~~ M~t .
· The required plan mUst accomp~y lhe Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLvED" IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
..-'. .". -~.... -...-- "~' -...~-"-~-..---.........-_.- ---..-..---
.~.:'"
.. . .. . .. . . .~.~_..... ,-!'''~'.-''''
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 937
Dated October 24th. 1986
Appellant Thomas J. Morley, Jr.
Fishkill, NY 12524
Address RD 1 - Box 133
At a meeting ofthe Zoning Board of Appeals on October 14 .19 86 . Appeal No. 937
was considered and the following action on the request for: XX A VARIANCE. 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance. because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district. because:
. ;.;;:-:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance 0 ee-gI'8Med Xi be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer n be confirmed 0 be.~. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
~!fJ~
Chairman. Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
October 24th, 1986
At the October 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Cortellino to deny the requested variance. They would be setting
up an illegal lot.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
pJ~
A gel aballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb