939
~
TO\VN OF '\APPL"iGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
,f\ . ,.) Appeal No. q ~~
~ ~VEDDate~OA'(\ll~.A
OCT .2 4: 1986
\ S- I S \G
}
Appellant 500-nf'le- O{)kJ~
IA )n{JPlyeR raJls (\/'/
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,Qb~ (9'aJrC:uA ,appeal from a decision of the Zo~g Inspector, dated
V , 19_, anc(do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0<.\ VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PER!vlIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
-AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at t, ~ :J-le)d)lmH./ a/vel
, (Street & no.)
, To""'T1 of Wappinger, N.Y.
RA~ lUlaMllWDEH
Address ~;;;.
Zip Code:
1Ie/dstme. 73/(/d.
/":))7tJ Tel.#: ;;Lc;7 37C7
w/c ;2q~S(}D5
- ~ C;\A(?,V. ,
(wrung dist.)
C/251- 00 - '34-11/'3
(gnd no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED fW::nGt,B~ ~~ 42.l -\0 t=i I \uvJ
e- S ~~ ^~ \ \" ~ t eJ-;10 c<ct w~ 1w.-
rePv ~ \<; 7AJ ~ ().(v p. iZ ~ O\;b~liOn ~d,;J~aPh)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). * re?)
a. .A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: Gee- 3 be.\lY0)
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this properry
. and in this district because: C. ~ '3 ~dov->) -
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: 1('\5131"'\1 rlcQ..nt c\i rrer-e.-oc.e on !<lYld tha..t a.buts co-Y1s€rvRiloN t..,f/!'Il> wH~R.r
lU-\.. :Bull..1)ING- fVoJ'b P€vf.l..cpf'flcNr 1$ PIiOrll{J17C"!:>.
b. A SPECLo\L USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zolling Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
,-.- .
3. OTHER REMARKS: J- WflS ml5LeD oY ..,.-He 13U/L1>€R. WHO 'PRoFeSS/Oil/ALLY TOf.-D
(V)E .r CaUL.:]) APPcy ArlER '(He FIIC/.
(Use extra sheets if necessary) . Signature ~~/ &~
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
.~.:"
.. .......
..' ~.'"":""
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACI10N ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 939
Dated October 24th, 1986
Appellant Joanne Oakley
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address 62 Fieldstone Blvd.
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appea1s on October 14th ,19 86 , Appeal No. 939
was considered and the following action on the request for: :g: A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMTI: 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
. :.!~.
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ijJ be granted 0 004cnied-and that the prevfous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 -be-ooafinnoo 0Cl be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
f/-rl;?/~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
October 24th, 1986
At the October 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Landolfi to grant the requested variance. The hardship was
inherited on the applicants part, this was not something she did on here own.
Unique because she has a hardship that the builder created.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Hirkala.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
1fr1;V~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb