936 ~..."\ -...... .... /' I- ~')/ ~ TOWN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL ~IVED Appeal No. ~ ~lo Date ~j.. ~I.U., \ q C( l () OCT 24,1986 Appellant ~"'ll-6 R ?<-n V ~ l/ '" rf~1 ~,,/1- tr-i. -II E\ilHfndl~IEN)... W () Address I Zip Code: luG:, () 1 ~ 0 fV'1' II:) 72- t'1. Tel. #:y 7 f -:~l t f TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I, J-/ tM..<1 fl-1Z1).1..--- ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated 7 - L 19 Y t , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 1"1 ~-- )Jwc-'-.'L.. fl..A, } /_ 0 0 (street & no.) C f>. <7 - L I \~ - 0-...( - f'.7 '-/ .1 I .} ,Town of Wappinger, N.)': (zoning dist.) , (grid no.) . 1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORPINANCE APPEALED ffi1\CA& $S~1\Cl-.,) ~zz,. Nt; i? OI\'oW k Cl, z.SI reow~~ s~ vJ~~ '?,ol l5 ~~:.-J) (article. section or subsection and paragraph) 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).. a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: 1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: . ~e., So' ~~~ ~V\l.%t- ~ N'O"l- o..Wtw"eJ), ~~ ~ ~~4""'~~ 'u..o~-t-'....cJ ~~~~\... 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shafed by all properties alike lin the immediate vicinity of this property s:6Th..et,- and in this di~tri~ because: y~~ ~\)W ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 1N-- 1-;' ~-+,.~ ~ l""'-~ i\-.is lo-t A-.~~I..-r \0 "'~\~ eM. . . 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: 1It~ v~~n~ ~)V\.L. ~,,~ \$ tN'tK" ~ 10' ~'^\~, b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: . ,. 3. OTHER RE~: 'R.. a ~ I-~ .,- ~ S- fl-.4p ^- , P f.- I ~ (.;It..- L;<, ~ ex- fl.~c..~C'- (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature ~1-- -~ . The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL Appeal No. 936 Dated October 24th, 1986 Appellant Herb Redl Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Address 240 North Road At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 14th, ,19 86 ,AppealNo. 936 was considered and the following action on the request for: B A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI1: 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: I c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 ee-gffifl:fed a be denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer IXkbe confirmed 0 bereversed:- SEE ATTACHMENT. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: fh-//V~, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals c" Page -2- October 24th, 1986 At the October 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Hirkala to deny the requested variance. There was no practical difficulty. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino. Vote: Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye Mr. Urciuoli - aye Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Hirkala - aye The motion was carried. fjr//J~ Angel Caballero, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals AC/lb