974
~
TOWN ~~\\APPL"GER . ..~ App<:UNo. ~
~OTICEOF APPEAL' . . fB t 2 1987 Date I':;' - .3c;- Fe,
a.- 1...Lt...
.. .,-.- ....' ..-..-
..*",,'.
~;'{:;;:':-"". ......>.:\jfY. 4.: ,~.
'_..'.."~~.'..''''''>~...'' T.. __,' ".... 4 ...~'_, .. _ ......._., .. .... '_.~'
'f"t. .~..
-
/. . Home Mailing .. .-..,. ....... .
. Appellant mR. ,E mils. (}fiS./YtRb Sj/h'R/9C/ItJO AddIes5 It 'LAke tJJ1lC1.d .oR,
':'i..J.CtfP/l1f~ rs. 4t1~ . IV .y. Zip Code: I~ s-q D~ Tel.l!: 297-096.;1..
TO TIlE DOARD OF APPEALS:
/))e I. I t""I . '
I, BIJ~,r:>/}RfE f 1l171~1tt:t. .:::,pa.. ra C In 0 . ~ppea1 from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
I ~ - 30" , 19& , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
':.:~ SPECIAL USE PERMrr. 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
...l.AGGRIEVEDPERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with pr~mises Ioc:l.ted at JGA ~ 01'J1~ W-\~
. (sum &. no.)
P-'VO t,;257'- 01- 3 ~ ~?tJ6 ,Town of Wappinger, N.):
(wrung OISl.) (gn11 no.)
1. PROVl~~THE,.ZONING~.RD. I.NANCEAPPEALED~I~$' S'eoh~ 42-1 ;.. t\1\0>^l
t\~ "'''' 'i . ~ \ ,- " . -
~ 0. '-:!:::!..-, ~lh\.1~ w~ ~I (<; ~w.~ M #\. ~\~ ~~v-kJ ~ .
. " . ...... "". .' . . _ (ulIcle. seC'lIon or 5ub~lIon:lnC p:ar<l!UllPh) "
2. TIPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).. '
. .
a. A VA.RIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following rQSons: . _
1) Strict appliotion of the Zoning qrdin~ce would produce undue hardship 'because: J.J 01]- t!ol1for rn /n r
lor- J./aYr{)t.>>Lo-r FCJe, l/fi2'1 hot/.1'e ·
. 2) The hardship cre:ned is unique and is not shared by :ill properties alike in the inunedi:ue vicinity of this properry
andinthisdistrictbe--..:lUse: Mos.7 (}7her Lon neG /oolwide fyt.?'" .fv~n7 To ee4r-,'
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signa,u&# ~'... ~,f~
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
r
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
""'..... . ]\:OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACI10N ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 974
DatedFebruary 11th, 1987
Appellant Mr. & Mrs. Gaspare Sparacino
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address 16 Lake Oniad Drive
Au meeting ofthe Zoning Board of Appeals on February 10th ,19 87 ,Appeal No. 974
. was considered and the following action on the request for: !Xl A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 woulc;l not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance Xl be granted 0 be denied and that the prevfous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be-eon-firmedIX be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
..
.~
'\
~ H,,-'-"-'
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
February 11th, 1987
At the February 10th, 1987 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Cortellino made a motion to grant the requested variance. It would
be a hardship now because somehow or another it by passes the administrator procedures.
It wasn't picked up by the Town. It is in place and now it would become a hardship
to take out 2i feet to conform with the sidelot.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Roe - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
.f!rr-
George Urciuoli, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Gu/lb