956B
-".
Appeal r-;o. C, r=) C. (~
Date (_)-.~ :J'I, ,q <;:;-c;
, '. ~ '"-~J.I TO\V1'l OF '\:-\PPL"'\GER )n! rl I)J
C \ r\ L? ~OTICE OF APPEAL RFt~
~../ \.JI'-< .NO\) ~ .J 1986
Appellant
(l.i- II' /\\ T
~-.> I -_,I,
Zip Code:
TO THE nOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
, appeal from a decision of the Zoninp Inspector, dated
. 19_, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT; 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at R+ 9
( '-1 0 I I lr <( L( 0 (SUel::[&no.)
~ B - ~A . -.Q,~' - y - . D \ ) . TownofWappinger,N.'Y.
(lOrang om.) U:nd no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OFTHE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED 1\ ) h ... ~-y~
I
0:
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following re:J.Sons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
~
1\\\.
~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by :ill properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this proper!)'
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
be'"..ause:
b. A SPECL-\L USE PER.\HT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
. paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to perrnit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
signaturel ~~- '
/'- C/
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appea1.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
t'OTlCE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACflON ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
956B
Dated November 19th, 1986
Appellant
Sprint
(Steve Simoni)
Address 784 Van Nest Avenue - Box 10462
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on November 18th ,19 86 ,AppealNo. 956B
was considered and the following action on the request for: g: A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, LJ AN
Il\'TERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would :J would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and. 0 would D would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 ~~ XX be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer n be confirmed 0 9@'~sOO. S E
E ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. lNfERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation ofthe Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
fh./jJJ~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
November 19th, 1986
At the November 18th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Cortellino to deny the requested variance. It has not been demonstrated
that it would create a hardship.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Hirkala.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
~/~~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb