967
.. .
----
,
TO\V~ OF \\:.\PPL~GER
r\OnCE OF A.PPEAL
~i~,~I\("l
J it.~ \...i : l \.;
Appd No. (i'Lo '7
Date Ll)()~(. l'l , I CJ \'-{.t
Appellant
Ferdinand Zipprich
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Home t-.laiJ.iDg
Ad~~s 332 Myers Corners Road
Wappingers Falls, NY
Zip Code: 12590
Tel. #: 297 -49 54
TO THE nOARD OF APPEALS:
Ferd inand Zipprich ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
Ni>V' . 11 , 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appe:lls for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OFTHE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEyeD PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 332 Myers Crs. Rd.
(srreet .& no.)
R-40 Single Fam Res. 135689 19-6358-01-299560-00
.
I,
, Town of Wappinger, N.'Y.
(wrung din.)
U:no no,)
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested bec:lUse:
-
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
~ ; -,"" ,"
'1" .J'/ ./' ~~
Signature ~'I:-!.:;%7'7Cl:41Cl "'~~. , <..-----------
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
T
APPELL.A....t\lTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS n..,rVOLVED IN PUBLISHING TEE REQUIRED LEGAL
l'OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
,
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 967
Dated January 5th, 1987
Appellant Ferdinand Zipprich
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address
332 Myers Corners Road
At a meeting ofthe Zoning Board of Appeals on December 23rd, , 19 87 , Appeal No. 967
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
.. :,;;.
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 -t>e-gffffitea IXI be denied and that the previ'ous
decision of the Enforcement Officer [XJ be confirmed 0 ~e1'5eEl. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation ofthe Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
-
rrl;?/~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
"
Page -2-
January 5th, 1987
At the December 23rd, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Cortellino to deny the requested variance. Alternative solutions
are available, for instance, remaining with a one car garage, or moving the garage
to the other side.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
fhl/V~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb
-