763
II
t~ \ (~ \ ~u
TOWN OF \yAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
r .-
; -<"':> .
~. -1'1,.
., A.
L~)e0
'I
Rl;"("'E'IVED
INOV 1 4,1984
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
AppeaJ No. '( G:, '5
Date (p I~ I y(j
- 0 \ I -J:2 It.. , Home Mailing 11\"..l.. Q
A~~"l~ f.~e.~_\'~ ~ .....IIC~Address OIQl. 1UW-.:C, .J
~Iucter~ __ ~ Zip Code: \'2..~~C Te1.tt:2.q7~71
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, ~r ~, l\lC\ '-l..C 13o.C' ~A\'U ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
~ ~u 25' ,19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: fl A VARIANCE, ~-= A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT,~AN INTERPRrTATION OFTHE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRlfVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connt'\.:tion with premises located at 0 L.. D ~u'J' c 4
Ll__ a \ A hlrCt'l.\: no.,
n 1:) ~ , Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
ft1mmg disl.)
(grad 1I1!./
I. PROVISIONtS) OF THE ZONIN(. ORDINANCE APPEALED c::::;.~ 'T'\ C ~ 4 ~ ~
~v\"c;.c.~\ ~~________.
~- f,1I111.:Jc:. 'It..'\.'llon or ,uf)\C.'\:IIOII iUIJ p..uaj,(ranl))
., TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant s\xtionl..
a. A \ARfANCE IS REQUESTED for the followlllg reasons:
I) SIn'-L application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hard'.hip bt'Cause:
2) The hard~hip created is unique and i~ not shared by all properties alike in the immediatc vicinity of [hi'> prorcrry
and in this district bt.'Cause:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the di~[nct
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERl\IfT IS REQUESTED pursuant to artide , section or SUIN:LtIOn
- . paragraph of t he LOl1il1~ Ordinance (() permit the followlIlg me on [11\':
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested bt'Cause: 'C'\""'''('VC''e..~~ ,,,.... b~ 2Q<,,\\ N" ,
~..u..,..-\ra.\CIC" &, "'"o..cL.~~\.... We. .rae..\ "eeCl, +"'f~C.~ l,.A.'r'~~'~
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested bt.'Cause:
3, OTIIER RErvIARKS:
(Usc extra sheets ifhccessary)
I -,
') '~',
Signature , / ~ /-:J~4;'" ,'j~
,~ \
I
}
.- /, // ~-'
<_wi / / \~7 ?/
),
· The required plan must accompany the NOllce of ApPl'al.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR TIlE COSTS INVOlVED IN PUIlLlSHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF WAPPINGER
ACIlON ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 763
Dated Nnv 14t:h, 1 qR4
Peter & Lucille Barbatos
Appellant
Wappinqer Falls. NY 12590
'. Nov. 13th 84 763
At a meetmg of the Zonmg Board of Appeals on , 19 , Appeal No.
was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE, [] A SPECIAL USE PERM [T, ~ AN
[NTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, [J AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
Address
Old Route 9
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it wac; determined that strict application of the Ordinance [J would C would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created I . is u is not unique and :~ would ~= would nor be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance == would == would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance C be granted LJ be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer C be confirmed == be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permn= be
granted C be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph or the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed c: be confirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal: SEE ATTACHMENT
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
,
() I " \,~
.,~.M~." l(,V C, .,...:::.,.. "! ,.,. l'
q--" "". '..J"'"~~'-"~J'"
'hairman, Zoning Board of X~peals
"- Page -2-
November 14th, 1984
At the November 13th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appea1~, a motion was made by Mrs. Waddle, that there are two
permitted businesses on this property. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Caballero.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
(1 ! . "
\. ~:u.. './'J \~.
o t
..
,,-,,7;, .,\.~,.f ..
.....;,,; ~~-...~......:Jt-~~-~J
V
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals