778
, .
..:2 I C ;~~
VL) e'-A0
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
'.~Ivr
iNOV 1 4 19b4
tq
Appeal No.
'LJ~
Date July 26,19:34
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Wappinger Falls, ~ew York
Home Mailing
Address 99 Edgehill Dr.
Tel~ j-43'lC:
12590
Appellant WILLIAM B. CHIN & MIAO-Clim~ CHH:
Zip Code:
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, William B Chin ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
Augu s t 23, , 19JiL , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 52 A VARIANCE, CJ A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, == AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 6 Kent Rd.
(street &: no.)
R - 70
(zorung dlSl.)
6258-03-213123
(grid no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
,? ~
--
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED 404. 1
~.~
(article. ,<:cuon or \ul",xuon ano paragrapn,
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
a. A \~~RrANCE !S REQL'CSTED for the foiiowmg rea",ons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the'spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: The adjoining proper~y is a Inul ti-:- family ?roperty, therefore
the aranrinohof a varlance for a flfth aoartment would not
cnanqe tne c aracter or tne alstrlc~- .
b. A SPECIAL USE PERt\lIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requesti..-d because:
3. OTHER RHv1ARKS:
(Use extra sheets if l1ecessary)
Signature
t~i!I~,8. Lh:,,~
~H11iam E. Chin
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONS1I3LE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE INTHE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF WAPPINGER
ACfION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
778
Dated November 14th. 1984
Ap~ll~t William Chin & Miao-Chen Chin
Wapp~nger Falls, NY l~~YU
Add 99 Edgehill Drive
ress
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Nov. 13 th ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 778
was considered and the following action on the rcquest for: ~ A VARIANCE. [] A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, [] AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance [] would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question C would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created ~ is ':::: is not unique and C would ,= would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. bel:ause:
~. The variam:e ~= would:::: would not I:hange the I:haracter of the distrJl:t. because:
Therefore. it was further determmed that the requested variance C -regffifl~a :-x be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officcr :.:z be confirmed C La: I CYCI :.cc:t. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution orthe Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit == be
granted C be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsc(.'tlon , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the deCIsion of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed C be confirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
Q~, .~ ~ A'" ..P
/7' " i'J'" \J_ _. '(i\..." ..., ·
~ V . ~ -~'~~d~.
Chairman, Zoning Boak of Appeals
Page -2-
November 14th, 1984
At the November 13th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, to deny the requested
variance because there was no financial hardship, and the apartment
is to small. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
('\ I ,~'1
\JI"'~ ,;.'.) ,
O'v . '-\
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
. #'j
h'" .
~ ~:'J';~.. ,AI ..p
-_...........~_.~;-. .u'!>
If