823
TO\VN OF ":-\PPL~GER RECE~
NOTICE OF APPEAL SEP lII:'~1r: Date
j ,-:l ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
/] /';; ;; , / t1 . d_/ Home Mailing /JA c;~
. Appellant _ L{ W-t'-~.e- (_ '/J7-.,clm Address l~rJ A::.
1I~;j.~12- f/< \ 7JpCode: //!- )<-3 fr- Td.#: 77'1-,-)753
r (/
TO TIlE nOAIU) OF APPEALS:
I, CAa "/of'.s C'I:'J r~ 7.1:- ,appeal from a dt.'Cision of the Zonin.:~ Inspector, dated
~ ~ ~ .;l / . 19 l? s: and do hereby apply to the Zoning Hoard of Appeals for: ~/ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECL\L USE PERMr'T, 0 AN INlERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEvT:D PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premis~ located at lit/ Sf" ,. u..la f to' r - t.Jt 1
. . (strCl:1 &. no.) ..
lI~g -/1/ t,J S~7-(,')/.I- (,/1 311 .TownofWappinger,N.i:
(zorung dlst.) (gml no.)
..
Appeal No. <( a '3
--:r:::..r. J- II / 9 ~ s-
, .-
CCl~
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED Ji..'/;c'/-e, n~ ....~;c.~f".; JJ 'ill,. 0-
0(' ,,:). I A.J -t.~~ (~ s,' J/S ~ ~?~ . ., A-Jd, r et_ll., ~ ii l4' () t..d-~,. u-
" '. I / (arllde. ~Ion or)5Ub-'<<1I0n and para. aph) / J
Or; 57'1-- tl (. ~ I- VI! /4J " ., ,.) "AJ I j " J.) ~ (I 1',' 'I,v , :J // /. 4 J4) of'Cf
2. TIPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevanfsection)..
a.J A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PER.\1lT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,section or subsection
. paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REl'vtARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Jig"a'U,e tl~ ()~'
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
"
~_........ r
,..- ': ~
. f ."~
~ .,'! ,j ~'f'"' '" :~: :~- Q';.
.. ...:~ ,.
t 'P. ""'"
~
:-.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACI10N ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 823
Dated September 11 th. 1985
Appellant Charles Coratti
__ Hyde Park. NY 12538
Address ROll t e 9
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on September 10th , 19__~ ,Appeal No. 823
wa'i considered and the following action on the request for: ex A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PER~lIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AI) AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), wa'i
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of th~ Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance [J would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonabie return if limited to th<.' use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created CJ is C is not unique and [] would [J would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use distrk1, because:
c. The variance 0 would [j would not change the character of the district. because:
Therefore, it wa'i further determined that the requested variance ::J _~ XJ be denied and that the previous
dt..'cision of the Enforcement Officer a be confirmed C ee~.
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it wa'i determined that the request for a Special Use Permit [J be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , sa.--rion or subsel.'tion . paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
~~~.
Chairman. Zoning Board of Appeals
- ,.- -. - -. j 'T.'-~"'"
Page -2-
September 11th, 1985
At the September 10th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals a motion
was made by }[rs. Waddle that the requested variance be denied because there is to
be only one (1) sign of 25 square feet on the property.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Caballero.
Vote:
Mr. Lando].fi- aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
(t'~~:1.i~
o V
,/."'...(' .
~. -O"~'t;.a2.~
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
ZB/lb
...... .>......................