772
..
.. EJd ( ~
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACI10N ON APPEAL
tlJ~
RECEIVED
'OCT 1 0 1984
Appeal No. 772
DatedOctober lOth, ~ 984
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
William C. Gross
15 Hammer Drive
Appellant
Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
Address
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 9th ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 772
was considered and the following action on the request for: IZJ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance C would C would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would " would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created '--. is C is nor unique and::::; would r' would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance C would-~ would not change the character of the district. because:
Therefore, it was further determined that t he requested variance C:::J be 1:;1 i.lIllt:I,Hz be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer ~ be confirmed :::J be-reversed.
SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit C be
granted [J be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed [J be confirmed. because:
3. fJ'ITERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
G_.32~'" L . ..('I ~
O'v i;~.rv \iI. ~~~"'. ·
f . 4-
V
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Appeal # 772
-2-
October 'Oth, 1984
"<
ti
At the October 9th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Cortellino, to deny the reouested variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli.
~
J
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - nay
The motion was carried.
n I'
'.~::. ~'(\;JI"!,.V
_O~ ~'
Mr. Joseph
/' ",p .
\J. "',,'~ ...l",.1.._1!' ",
· -- ".........- V
E. Landolfi, Chairman
1
FE~ ,~_ -,'-;5 ,()D
REC' 0" ~ Lu-.-,,; c~OWN OF \VAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date
1
Appeal No.
I Appellant
William C. Gross
Home Mailing
Address 15 Hammer Drive
Hopewell Junction, NY
Zip Code: 12533
Tel. #: 896-5600
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
William C. Gross
, appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
Jul y 23 , 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~A VARIANCE, 0 A
". SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in conna.tion with premises located at Rou te 9
(street & no.)
HB 2A
6156-02-737984
(gndno.)
, Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
(zonmll disL)
1. PROVISION(S)OFTHEZONINGORDINANCFAPPEALED Section 473.2 J _ Jlr<'I~'JWlfr-
rfi ,~~r~~t),'f~)I~ t 411;:1"", ql ~:.t t."r\~~ Cl;Sp:~'f:', ",'~I ~~"jr;,1~; I, d
(article, ~l'CtlOn or ~ubsa;lIon and paragrapn)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).. ~ee;' Cd:;illL~h~
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordmance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.