791
<
2l3~
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER ~a.J Appeal No. 7 ~/
RECEIVED
NOTICE OF APPEAL Date /2/f'i/f' f/
FEB 1 4 1985
Appellant \, Y' -D~. 111' t> I
-s-. H (] n 11/ ",e ~,
J
c9-/~- f.j-
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Home Mailing
Address l (} 0v../ ;i I )
Zip Code: / )..')--)' ()
[;)'"'-r't"II.{)~I) f-.?i6
JI/ "
Tel. #: ;: i'l . 7 } I 7
TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS:
" , (~,. ,. \
I, '0;. /~ ,\ 0 ~ - co' 111'1. appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
'\',; ~ _ (u C', 19 .f"; ,and o1tereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, ~ INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN -
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 7) I ~ C~~ ~
,J (street '" no.)
_R L () , {, 2 sJ . (..1 ~'CJI )( 0 J.-- , Town of Wappinger, N.Y..
(zoning dist.) (grid no,)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
.I . ~/':::'" c./
(C; e~J7tJ)1 ~/ /' <-- ~,2 /
(
Jfi= ~ .
(article. section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
_______ , paragraph ._____ of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following me on the
above premises:
~RPRETATI~N of the ZoningOrdin~ce is ~equ.este~ beca~se:~:_~ t\.(.A~t 'k- ~ .1lV.;:~fFIl04;;j:-.c.,/.-
,~tU~ .~.(Tl.V<r',~,~~1'<....i~C...~.r:>.(~'-") v~ L...J.:~\
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: ~ . -~ y
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
/-'", -1 r\ ,
i -', I.,
\ \ 1.. ,I .
Signatu~" h, 0 ~ ~D 1/0"
'. U "
~
\
i
I
1
"
. The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
, '
.. ~ ri".";
~ ,'.'.;:
-
ZONING BOARD OF Al>pEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTlON ON APpEAL
Al'l'CalNo. ~
Dated yeb. 14th. 1985
Feb 12th 85 791
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on' - , 19_ ' Appeal No.
was considered and the following aetion on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, i&l AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(Sl, was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that striet application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
NY 12590
Add P.O. BOX 997
= ress -
APpellant
Wa
Dr. Daniel J. Hannigan
b. Th~ hardship created == is 0 is not unique and 0 would n would not be shared by all properties alike in the
VIClmty ot the property and in the same use district, because:
=
c. The variance 0 would c::; would not change the character of the district. because:
Th~r~fore, it was further determined that the re uested v' 11
decISIon of the Enforcement Officer 0 be conf;rmed n abnance '-" dbe granted 0 be denied and that the previous
2 SPE ~ e reverse .
. CIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it w d .
gzran.ted 0 ~e demed, pursuant to article eel'as etermme~ that the request for a Special Use Permit 0' b
omng Ordmance d h . ,s Ion or subsecnon e
an ,t eret ore, the decision of the Enforcement Off ~ ' paragraph of the
Icer LJ be reversed 0 be confirmed beca .
, use.
3. IN~RPRETATION: The Board adopted the followi .'
Ordmance as requested in your appeal: ng resolunon whICh stated its interpretation of the Zoning
SEE ATTACHMENT
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S
): By resolution of the Board the f 11' . .
, 0 owmg decISIon was made on yo
ur appeal:
J-r~~' i
Chairman Z . ~ /
, omng Board of A a1 /
ppe Sc
Page -2-
February 14th, 1985
At the February Uth, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion is made by Mrs. Waddle that the interpretation
is that there is a veterinarian use on that 10 Acres of land, therefore,
there is no other use permitted on that property. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vo te:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mr.Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
Jar ~ ~.
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals