822
'"
. TO\VN OF \\f\PPINGER evJ
~V !,;OTICE OF APPF_<\.L REC~D
!JUL'15 1985
Appeal No.
Date0.L'\....--.L.~
~ :~:::)-
v _
l ('+-k. ILl ~~
I
II - ELAI.NE H. Uomt tailing
AppeUant J) C}. V /~- ( ;-117 c 1// IV c- __~ /'/\"'-L..J Address 'l f3 ,P >' ("'
tV; /) 0 , ~ ~_..~ r- ~ /~- /V~ y
~" '/ '
TO THE nOAIU) OF APPEALS:
-.-----..
I. k~..~<,~ }.cr- B I--/Qr..--//,:".:,..p y- ,appeal from a decision of the zon~.n .Inspector, dated
, ~
. 19_, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals f'Jr: ,A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at f11_Aj<ECS ~O fV1~(~ Q.d.
;( - dO, '" 1-S-7 - O;l - ~ 9 9 9 <J 'I , Town of Wappinger:~~~~ no.,
(wrung di5t.) (tnr.1 no.)
Zip Code:
/ d...s""'9L~\
L:}
Tel. #: ,1.'77 - 9--2.0 y
S.:~I/~ ~ 1-/ 1/';',3 J
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant set.'tion)..
a. A \~\.RIA.I\[CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:t1,e... COUA(l'~~
--te,ot. (1 -1<J l ~ ~-d ~ ~ l &-Q~ ~ rDdd.
2) The hardship created is uruque and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) Tne variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the di~trict
because:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Sigflature
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPON~)IBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
l\OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
';".' ....
.~:
. t'-:
.0 .
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
Dated July 12th, 1985
822
Appellant H. B. Office Machines Inc.
Wappinger Falls. NY 12590
Address 98 Pye Lane
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 9th ,19 85 , Appeal No. 822
was considered and the following action on the request for: K1 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI1: 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it .was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons: .
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
"
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
-::-
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 ~-affied IX] be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer [Xl be confirmed 0 ge-~. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INfERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
Chairman, Zoning Boar of Appeals
'ft' ..
Page -2-
July 12th, 1985
At the July 9th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Cortellino, seconded by Mrs. Waddle that the requested variance
be denied.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
(} / ,r""' "
(/;"1/'\1 ". '" "'~""{i~"
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb