847
CG~
TO\\"i'\ OF \\APPI.:\GER
~OTICE OF APPEAL
~,~
Arreal r-.:0. q-lI 'l
Se.cl /1/fRr
I F
.'
D..lte
-?
Appdl.111t /oLJhl?- ::z=_c.-;-"'t/. ,,"~~''''r/t(-!
.Jt'11,AJ //.- " '-A,. C
Id.<~{ '/J I I'r' LL_-l~L...A--
Home \L1ilin~
/1lt!nrlNQdress3-F #",,11;'/i~/ <:.L-__
Zip Cude: -1,..( rye) Td. !t~;t:ZLf!..tZ
..TO TIlE no.\RD OF APPL\L'i:
, ~ - --.
I, ','''l'3t-.,t:;r-- V'~lIJ4-~ ,.1rre:li from a tL'C.',iOll uf :h~ Lor.ins In:;pC'':tor, cbtd
Sot?lf. / '1 . 19J~,.!.~, ar,d do h::;eby apply to the Z\.ming nO:lrd c{ APPt":Jl.') f,)r: CJ A \i\RIANCE. [J i\
SP,::CL\L USE PER\!I1: :J A:'i 1l"ITERfRET.\TlO:'-J OF THE ZO:"~I~,;(j CRDI:--:..,\:':CE, C 'IN APPEAL AS AN
ACC,RIEVED PERSONIS) (c~h:d: proper onl::'. in conn<."I.:rion with premi'ic,'i j)GHL"ti.H 3:? /7('., Jt1t'~" f (10 u!::l:
._. (m~l &. no.'
I I I .__.11.1 5'7 - ~~ ~ - 97 '197:) ___, Tyvn c'f Warpin~e", N.Y.
(z.cf WA u. >1.) lUlU 1'<) I
'.~l
1/,-:1_ f ,. a ,.j (... ,+ '.
f
:0
I
I , r'
,} , I rj
7- I i''> .., _ '
1. PROVISIO~(S) Of TI IE ZO~<It'~G ORD{~'~ANCE APPEALED
,.
~~'-tc
J ", .-;-
1'-""'.'fJll...'~/ i,;.':,
,
r I
.--.,-, /
~ ( :<. - 1. /'-', f---~
...~ ".-' ":"Jt:~' (I. /' .i:~/
2. TI'PE OF APPEAL (Comp!~re rdt::vant st::<_1ion)." ?(j ~ /
~_ -/l ~..::-' /f/
r..... ;
i
(Jll,de. ',<"<-1lon or \Ub>dIIOn anJ p~[4.n::r:1
'. ,_.J "':r /I f /_ .~;.i ;' "".; . "" I") J:._,_, :: 14-.~'"
;:;
;.0 S 1-<1- II d. S-.w; /,.un / /
a. A \:.\RL\(\;CE IS REQL:ES11:D for the folluwing re:LSons:
1) Srrij'1 aPl'liGuion of t!~~~ Zor.ing OrdinJ.Dcc would prodw.:e undue kmjship b.'cluse:
2) The h:udship cr,::Heu ., unique and is not shJ.red by all prc;:ert:-:::, ;lU.c: in t:lt: in;rned:.1te \- i.;ir.ity of t~:is prcr<rt'j
and in tbis disrri\...-: br'oo~_2.L")'~:
3) Tne V:lr1;ll1U': would ob"er.e the spirit of the Ordin:U!ce;ll1u .....cu!J :10t chan;e the ch:.tract..:r of the w:;tri,-'1
beG1Use:
b. A SPECI.\L l;SE PER.\lIT IS REQL:ESTED purSU:lnt to and;: . section or sub';ecUon
. p:lragr::lph of the Zoning Ordinance to pt:rmit the following use on the
above premi::,~:
c. l~1ERPRET\TIO~ of the Zoning Ordinanct: is requested bt::C::lu:;e:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSO~(S):m appe:1l is rt::quested bet::luse:
3. OTHER RE~IARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
· TIle required plan must accompany the Notice of A ;Jpeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPO:--JSInLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBUSH[NG THE REQUIRED LEGAL
l\OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
. . ~
,r.O _
.. ......-. !---.. I .. ..
..
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
847
Dated October 8th, 1985
Appellant Rohert Julian & Ann Mickelic
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
AJdress 38 Hamlet Court
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 8th " 19~_, Appeal No. --.347 _
was considered and the following action on the request for: G~ A VI,IliANeE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI-:~ 0 AN
INfERPRETA nON OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN fiYPEAl. AS AN AGGRlEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. v:\.RJANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that SIrict application of the Ordinance 0 vJouU 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. 'nle property in question 0 would 0 would not }ield a rcascmabie return if limited to the use permitted .lJ.1der th.~
OrdinaI1ct~, hx:ause: __.
~... ... -......
b. 111c hardsbip created C is 0 is not unique and [J would 0 ',lIQuid not be ~.hared by all properties ,dike in the
vidnity of ihc property ,md in the same use district, bec:ause: __
c. The variance 0 would [J would not change the character of Lhe district, because:
I
Ther.~fore, it was further determined that the requested va!"iance [J l?@.gnmt~ [] be denied ai1d that th--: previ.ous
decision of the Enforcement Officer ex be confirmed 0 be-f~W"f~.
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL U~;E PERMIT: By re:solution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Pemlit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
/'
1
~..v'v <0....... . ,
, · ~"';;.~~r"
Chairman, Zonhg Board of Appeals
- ,f ~
Pa~e .~2-
At the October 8th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Caballero that the reque.' ed variance be denied.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cart Lino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cor
Mr. Hir
11ino - aye
:.a - aye
The motion was carried.
.~..14it.#
,
\..,"1
~.
}-::J .
-. . ., " ...f.. ", .~I'
. Ir~'
~.
oj
Jusep:l E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb