783
C lo \ U TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
-C NOTICE OF APPEAL
~
RECEIVED Appeal No. 1 ~ ~
DEe 1 2 1984 Date \ 0 - \ <6 - ~ y
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant /f:,;\/ Ai-D a 1Y/,4C Ke> JA./ /4 k
Home Mailing
Address .3 AJ;r},vCy 4 Le::l::-V brlvc-
,
'1/~.p"A/Cens ;::;7 //..$ /VY'
Zip Code:
/..;207d
'6? 7~
Tel. #. '1IJ/-z"8~
DIS c.~
TO 1HE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, If:v;:lz-tJ -<'7 ~c'Kc.tV./.4 /<.. ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
tlCt- ~ b . 19.D- . and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMrr, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ~. AN APPEAL t\ AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)(check proper one), in connection with premises located at3 /L)a.~Ydle~n r.
I', a (street & no.)
~... ~ D ,-L IS (- O~ - - I g~/I<] ,TownofWappinger,N.Y:
(zoning dist.) C. (grid no.)
. .:;1 ) G Lc ( \ l - G:0 - c) \0 Ilc c;
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
(article. sectIon or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
@AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is reques~ed be;ause: !JE(/G?~'pEr". t,?~~. ,4~/ -t / ~ rn~<--1'n.f~
77o...R. ""'""t"io<f-""'c/' ...,.....o~r- /<..?4R Y.4~{/ SEr,64C'/<., /e',... /P-2o eon~YV7'
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
i~~tf~a /11~
ยท The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
783
Dated December 12th, 1984
A 11 Ronald B. Mackowiak
ppe ant
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
3 Nancyaleen Drive
Address
Dec 11th
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on . ,19 84 ,AppealNo. 783
was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, ~ AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would C would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would " would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance = be granted C be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer LJ be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit Q be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed C be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal: SEE A TTACHMEN'T' .
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
5),'o.t C G:
t.J
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
,.(}
':. ..i :.. ,::. ,-,j).# '
~. "~--'-"J
1/
Appeal #783
-2-
December 12th, 1984
At the December 11th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning BOard of Appeals,
an interpretation for Article IV was given by Mrs. Waddle as follows:
Article IV is well stated in the Zoning Ordinance; on a corner lot
there shall be provided a sideyard on a side street equal in depth
to the required front yard. A rearyard shall be provided on each
corner lot and the property owner shall elect the yard which is the
rearyard. Jeff Hunt Developers have done this, and they are well
within the Zoning Ordinance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - absent
Mrs. Waddle- aye
The motion was carried.
Q~2.:"',}",
O~ ~.
..r,1 ,...,n .
loJ, ~':::"~r
Mr. Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Ib