835
.-
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
835
Dated October 8th, 1985
Appellant Fri =dric~~ And-:ew Metzger
Wappinfer F'a~ls, Nl~_~~__
J.ddn:ss 4<~ Fenrnore Drive
At a mt~ting of the Zoning Board of ApP'~a1s on October _8th ____, 19 85 . Appeal No. 835 _____
wa.:; considered ond the following action on the ,fquest for: [J A VARiANCE, [] A SPECIAL USE PERN1JT, [J A0-
INTERPRETATIOI\ OF THE ZONING ORDJNANCE, 0 AN APPEA1_ AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), W3.S
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution cf the Bo;ud, it vms determined that ~trict aprlication of the Ordinance 0 would C] "yculd
not produce U:ldue hCJxdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasona bIe retJrn if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, bet:ause: ____
:-. - .."
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is net unique and 0 wou:id [J wculd nor be shared by all properties alik(: in l:he
vicinity of the property and in the mme use distlict, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
,
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted [J be denied and that the previous
d,,-crsion of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be ft~versed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit [] be
gfaRted ~ be denied, pursuant to article , sectiol1 or subsectjon40~.J-,Sc40~~mgraph __ of ~he
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
SEE ATTAClll'1ENT
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution ofthe Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
~ c. ~~f"
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
. '
~ Page -2-
At the October 8th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Caballero that the requested Special Use Permit be denied because
the parties that are requesti.ng have not come in to give us information of what
they want to do there for the second or the third time. This nleans they have to
pay new fees if they want to corne in again.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
rr
r;
.
.<;;t~, .
. lit'
----
Joseph E. Landolfi, Cha.irman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb
t(~
TO\VN OF \\APPI~GER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
~
!O-!\-(v
Date
~~,~
~ I ..... ..j
'11 ::))( I \ ~
,_......
Appeal (\;0.
...-
App~Uam ('121 E: D (J I ( H 4 I} ~J >> e EU-.-'
-u~lAffl N,)f:r25 fAu.:i-4
TO THE Bo.\IU) OF APP[A(~"i:
[, r:i I ~ ,? J (';1 ~ /I ~~ 0 e~1~J ~5rZ '5612--, appeal from a u;."L1sio:l of t!:t: Z,JrlJng [nsp{.'Ctor, da~cd
-- L ,--- -
.~(. \, I.) , 19_ SS , and do hereby :1r;ply to the Zarting Board of .'\pre:1h for: r::] A V.\RIANCE, ~ A
SP[C~AL U~.:E PERMIT, ~AN I;\iTERPRET.\rION OF TI IE ZO~ING Ol\DINA'\CE. [] AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGKIEVED PERSON(S) ((hech. proper one), in connection with premises hX::l1ed at _L!::~ IVI ei ~~.s C:4/2/v'6J25
_ _ (>tlel:t dO. nu.) .e Ii .
I.::.' , dO ~J. S'"'c'f... c'!/-.:- S-3s 3 tJ.),- __...... ~,,';,,1 ~)~. '.";ii'iJin;Cr, >~ Y.
--- (zoC'';';!;;:iJ'--' -- (gndnu.) .
Home Mailing
M tTZ.~.e-!2 AJ-kess q-j.. p(~ fy" (.1 ea- b 12 Itl e
7Jp Cod~:
"l ~ r.
/ o~ 'oS I~O
Td. It: eJ f 7 - '1163
1. PROVISIO~(S) OF THE ZO~ING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~ 4'1) c/. .3 " ~:C' y. 3..3
A.IO fJ - C-(),l..l Fa e fv1 , /.J G
056 of 5((2 cJ C TcJ rLe.s
{arode, >t"(;llon or ~UO>dllcn and pa..awJaprll
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant set.:tion)."
~. A \:.\RrA.:~(:-E IS REQUESTED for th~ following reasons:
1) Stri~t :lppliGltion of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship b;'G1U~i'~:
2) 'l1:e h:.rrdship cre:1ted is unique and i<i not shared by all rropertles alj~.e in t!:e immedi::1:e vi(;in..ity of this property
and in thJ5 district c~aU'je:
3) -TIle V::Ul::111(e would observe the spirit or the Ordin..lm:e and would nor chan;e the character of the distn(.."1
because:
Q A SPECIAL USE PER.\1fT IS REQUESTED pursuant to ankle 'to</. -3 ,seffi.:')~j+I;G~
40 c.(. 33 , paragr::tph of the Zoning Ordinance co permit the following use o~ the
(lbovepr~!l1jses: Mf0't, Srcf2-A-l.-e; ""N~ ff2oceSSr/.J6.- PLfrtJI'"
@ rYrERPRETATION oftl:~ Zoning Ordinance is requested bec~se: -rJ-lG ()/2oPoJc/D c) 5'5' t $
5/MI("'fH2.... of!- t..e5~ NON-CONFoeMlkJ6- /Hft1.,) l1-I-e PREViOUS' uSe::"'<\"
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS: ~ 0 S (....1'1 (", (, H n:; e I ~ 6- 0 {2-
W ( L L- () C C. c) (2 (: ~ ,1+ e: prz eM. ( 5B
.----
I
A' /1
(Use extra sheets jf necessary) Sigl1ature - ! .. .'
t2-eTfll L
SI1 L. e;,
. /
/ (' ~~I
,/ I
/ ~ l ..4
i' ; I." I .'" ,-' .-/
',..- -- ;..--
,.
<--'~~--i---
/
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
I I
\ .
, !
'.,,/.'.,/
. :. ( I
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
l'OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
. f .-
t"'!, .,...
,,"":