803
....
Cll~
TO\VN OF'VAPPh"'GER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
~
rJUN 1 4 1985
Appeal No.
Date
<603
~-I- 8'~
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant lYlIc.H4eL 't ~u5~1 (Y1U/1fl/tY
CJ II pp, N GOo- ElL >~ Fi1LLs' "I Y
TO TIIE BOARD OF APPEALS:
Home Mailing
Address ~ 3 Ft/~Lj) 'STdr..lE. 8L\j b
Zip Code: / .J S- 9 0
Tel. #:':J<J7-1 'i:1!1.
I, m IcHflEL '? S 05/1"'/ m UIUz-A Y ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
, 19_ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: l;( A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS A."'l
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S} (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ;)? FIFLbs:rC/r./E e L "b
~ /) . j. (street & no.)
^ - J-O (g II " /, :J.S7 - 0/ - /) 9; 7()7 >>TownofWappinger,N.'Y.
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
[}l!cf/~'~ 4/1. 9~~
ItA;/:e T, &quia-f,clUS
, /
.,
(article, section or subsection and paragraph) /J'l '
~ 1/ a.";4 ~C ~, ;1; a I/o tv r(,.~ eL l/ I 1-~.rUc <e.
2. TYPEOFAPPEAL(Completereleva.ntsectionl.;~/.jft.. r- /';"1/'.1.., I ~ 3' tI ;~ /'0'" Jr.
/.,)";/01. F"'lVt"I'~) 1'-' ;:;~/d H'OJJ >4' ra-rh1 r d
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2} The hardship created is unique and is not shared by aU properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article . section or subsection
>> paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
~ /Jt~
Signature L-.___ VY\ ~ ~"h
, \ \
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
.,''':'}.
_~; ~~, v.~.-
~-,~l .
.:'. t:_:~7.,.
c
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. RO ':\
Dated .Tl1ne 14, 1 QR'l
Appellant Michael & Susan Murray
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address 23 Fieldstone Blvd.
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 11th ,19 85 ,Appeal No. 803
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and C would C would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance [J would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance CJ-b~.g;an.t~ ex be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer ex be confirmed 0 ~e'f'Cf'~
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit [J be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
(). l ""& ~l)
/Jil3!';,l-iAJ ~. ~H~'x4t'''('-1~.. 4
~airman. Zoning Board of i~pea1s
. "'t"
Page -2-
June 14th, 1985
At the June 11th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mrs. Waddle, seconded by Mr. Cortellino that the request variance be
denied on the basis that no hardship was demonstrated.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
(\ I ,,:"'" ...f)
~h "'. ~'~~.
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb