777
t) lct.W
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER RECEIVED
ACTION ON APPEAL 'OCT 1 0 1984
YlLW
Appeal No.
777
Dated October 10th. , 984
A eHaot Angl~lo Petrillo
Wgpplnger Falls, ~y
12:,YU
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Add Marlorville ROad
ress
. . . October 9th, 84 777
At a meetmg of the Zorung Board of Appeals on , 19 , Appeal No.
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. LJ AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, [] AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance [J would C would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question [J would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created C is L= is not umque and ~--= would := would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance C= would := would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance j{ be granted ,"-; be-den1ed-and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer C bemTTtirrrrectKl be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PER,'\lIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit = be
granted C be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsecrion , paragraph of the
Zorung Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed [J be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRET.'-\TION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
J-J..- C. .;f'''''''_IU ·
, ~~~
Chairman, Zoning Board oPAPpeals
Appeal #777
-2-
October 10th, 1984
At the October 9th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciouli, to grant the reouested variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
g~ ~ ~~:
Mr. Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
. FEE
..~ ."
'-~.~ N)
C/~" r2t.lX( tL(('~bwN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. f1!J!J
~ I;) ~J yl-L
I
'REC;b
i
Date
Appellant A f1 ~ ~ \ 0 f E.+ \' t { ( c)
\.:J \\-81" ~<:\ "....<; 'f ...\h 1) t'
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, t['V'YL,g,; j7 ~ f ~~ , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
g I d 3 (j , 19-R#., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A
.'. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~ ~ Rd.
(street &. no.'
If -- :) () & / S7 - 0 I - a S"? 70 D
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
Home Maili:fu . \\
Address Rfl.. ~~ ,,\ -e
~.
Zip Code:
\ d.. S'" C\ \:)
Tel. #: i'-1~7-q67t..{
,TownofWappinger, N.Y.
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
~ -Y':?I
~~L TV
I S I S- \ d eLl 21 t cl ('\ C H'~, ('if f(
(article. seclldn or subsa;lIon and paragraph)
\ t LU.:. 1---( :)'l t l (j U' i'F-{ l u..,. C
'v
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict. application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: () I .
on \~ 11 ~ a-O- c..\ ~O-~I/\.CJ~ 0 'n Y\o~~ ~ ,'\0 ~ 0", 0 w~\.\. \Jt)~
2) The h.mIship cNated is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this ptoperty
and in this district because: ,,\-- \..rJ -\,,~ 0""\'-'., ~\'A-c\:\~~l €h..'fH::e: ~
-p11-\ ~Q ~OOI-\-\~~ 0
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: ;~ '\NC~\ ~ ~ -\'\ \ \-\,,~,;,<,^~ <'(\ f-\ r-~S q~'<.. ~\~ ( ):JI..~-\i' '\ c.:..'i--.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsectiun
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(\ .~.t<...a'&
~~r,-
\b ~{"",'~ ~ 'YV\..
~~
~--,
~~~~--~ ,--=
A--,,~~\.D \J~~~\\\~
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.