794
(] ~orOWN OF WAPPINGER
-G IAPR 1 ~ 19S5'JOTICE OF APPEAL
AP~q LI
Date d I~ y~
.,
\
'~
IWR1 & ...
I
/' /
I,:r-J/t- I
Appellant /1...., / f ? {, t (/C
/ !1 /) () 1'. r-
l 1)1 I~'r. r I f
,I/t: (!I}~C
fL{ I
/
(c.' ~!~ / I" Home Mailing '7 )I( ,
,) , i" ...k"~,,Address & v
.'
/-7 r-j<./
Zip Code: '-
"1'fjEX1C;;~ ('2')
Tel.#:c:?So/l f/7//
e7f)
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I. ,kile;/?{' ( I f ,:17/) S t' ! /;J~j!.;L , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
()(.-j-,. 3/ , 19 8''fI, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ,.) Yu /J;; (/tc::ej
'(street & no.)
ALe ,&,;<S-g-02- -7SL;l~O& ,Townof':!uppinger,N.'Y.
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED 41"6. r;: ~~I"*;'o1 'tfj, 4.5-:2. 7:0
/7 II/h) 0 ~~^.,..ft. 8/3 YJ of a' d:eY/? (0) .~f'+~haLk' ,.Jhen :.1 ,.:?,") f ,S,..."h -t),u:i/
~ '/. _ () . J / . (article. section o.r subseclion and paragraph)
+ rOM 17~ "t rovrt; I {)-r:; 111e...;..s re.1/./.iyel.
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
I
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED forthe following reasons: 7",,>,!\I.A. ~]-b.J 1YI" C'-' ~c.l ,llY-'t...
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: i (2.../';1 tt1,)C:!,r c:' ~ /!,()
AfJ"~O 'I ~Ol -ProW\ ,,<<tI""~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district be-.:ause:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article . section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premi5e5:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
,,/'1 ,~I -
'; ;
Signature 1....,,1, L
4~;/~ . /
C
/'
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
..~
".
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 794
Dated April 11 th, 1985
Appellant Kathleen & Michael Schnorr
Wappinger Falls, NY
Address 240 Myers Corners Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 9th , 19 85 ,Appeal No. 794
wa') considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, C A SPECIAL USE PERrvIlT, :::J AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance C would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question CJ would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created !-:= is = is not unique and :-.J would C would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance i ~ would..::: would not change the character of the district. because:
Therefore, it wa') further determmed that the requested variance LX: be granted : O1'-(TeIuec.fand. that the previous
dL"Cision of the Enforcement Officer l= bc..conlir.mcd x:: be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERI\I1T: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit C be
granted i----' be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer t.: be reversed C be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
n 1 ...
'..'J. _"~,""~ ~~~~-~-:J ''-_'. ~ .. ., ,.,
~ r ,'....... '''.. -'--. -....d
o ~ . {/
Chairman, Zoning Board o( Appeals
-(
--
Page -2-
At the April 9th, 1985 meeting of
made by Mrs. Waddle that the requested
by Mr. Cortellino due to the fact that
this point.
April 11th, 1985
the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
variance be denied. The motion was seconded
it is not our proper business to review at
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent at time of vote
The motion was carried.
lb
-..'.... .j
l7 ~".' ~/ ,../
,,/ f
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
~