846
"'"
TO\\'~ OF "~-\PPI~GEH.
r\OTICE OF APPE.AL
Appe:1l l'0. ~ "-llr
Date slJlU \ ')".
~
'\WUar., /J~~A ~ t>/ II SoL t'I/I S..e
. I'
PM:; U:..:'3.:!'.l'tS; -e. /.If -.
T()nl[~3 HF.DOFAPPF-\l.s(! r
r. -\ ./ ..~;; Jt:...J411;;.e . . .
Ln' I t:.~ -e/ /I ---L1/. Jrpt"J1 frem a J:..\.T,:on :.It the ZUnIn~~ (lir,:,_.tor. L!.l~~j
j.. 1'.3 L P/~__. , 19 J'S-. and..;o h:n:by Jpriy ro the Zdning Eo:'sd 0f Apr'ea.!.,:> for: ~ A I,!\RIA~;(T. [j :\
~)i' :CL\L USE PEP.~IlT. CJ A:'~ I~TERf'RETAn():\ OF THL:: ZO~l~(~ ORDINANCE, LJ ,\.N AP1'E.\L, \S .\>~
,\C!:JRlf::\-ED PER~;ON(S) (ch~"~k proper one), In cunne\:tion with prenUSC:i !,xatL't1 at ;11.?Q1u1f- Sr
AJ 1./ .~ r:::... ~:- - . '- _. -- L 0 L _~ 1-' . \,tr~UL .01
0-l~ S t If ____ ,--,,- 1 '-) L~~~-L:.....:~L~- . ToJ',,," of Warpiflser. N. Y.
\L..'fUJ1ll ,bl I ci,nJ ;..)./
HOlTl~. ~I;lllin< .,--" PI." I~/J /} J
AJ..lz ~'iS / ....J ."jr 1<' /'{./ r <:(
" r
Zip Code:: ..LX () / T-:I. #:9/).1 ';~/7()7/S'
. , i I '/ .-;---;-.
1. PROVISION(3)OFTHEZO;\lINGORDI:\AI'~C[APPEAL[D !'';-I-,.: ~- /(/.-
i 'J I I " II'
I t-: I-~ /rILl j.I ..e t1 J,.) .€ II ~; 'f()' II-d;"" ,. N;f j, .ot ,td If,,; f.J
I J-I .ry;j I . . .3 '. I ; (,;If',ie.s<"'.'lunor~ulJ.,arll.nJnLlt:~yaUJ:Jnl .-.J ~J
"." ( 1'\ ti ;:) 7 f. b ;L ,*'!: .~ f" IV '1- s;r r tI. ~ 7' i.l ;. ..~ "" ,..,
2. rITE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant s<:t.1IOn).. f11-~ /' -II r 7
a. A \~\RIA:\CE IS REQUESTED fc.r the fl)l!O\~ing re:l.<.om:
1) S[rif1 ap~li-:ation of the Zonin~ Ordinance ~',ouJd produce uncJue h:1fG';hip hL"::lUS~:
S .~ -i-,
",,("//[.;..
, ~ i' ....p
I,'-it" "t . "f ';
l_':~'-~
#L. "I / j. -e p /,1 r :t:..__
, I-
,1(.1 ",() - l:' N -('... ,,,,I" .A.,
/'
2) '1 he hJ.rd~hi~-.:re:lld i'i unique ~',nd i) not sha.r:'J by lit propt:r~i~ '-lIite in t!:e immed;J.te '.i-::r,i:y cf t:~i'j rrvr':n':
and in t~is Jistri"L b(.\::1U:.\'::
3) The vJ.riJ.Ilc~ \,;ouIJ ob:icr;e t!:<.: spir.t of thl: Ordin.l:1';e:md wau;..! not dnn;.;c the chJ.r.J.;t::~ of the l.ba.;..t
bet:~use:
o. /.. SPECiAL '\.;SE PER:,iiT i:'; RFJCESTED pursu:u:t to :1ft!cl:: . sC\..,i~Jl1 or suosectJon
. p:J.rJgfJph of the Zuning Ordin:1flce to permit the foiiowing u:;c on the
above premises:
c. f0<'TERPRET.\TIO:-'; of the Zoning 0rdin:1flc~ is rcqut:sted because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSO:--:(S) an JppeJl i'i requested bec3.use:
3. OTHER RE~IARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necess:1fY)
Sig"atll~/jJ SJ!u~ S,r.
. The required pl:1fl must accomp:1flY the Notice of AppeJ.1.
APPELLA:--ITS ARE RESPONSmLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED [N PUBLISH[NG THE REQUIRED LEGAL
l\'OTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
f;'" """"
";"1"-. :
. . .-:
,,;. ~ 1'" \; .
,.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 846
Dated October 11th. 1985
Appellant Michael Schwall Sr.
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address
15 Spring Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Anpeals on Octobe::- ilth _____, 19JL~_, Appeal No. -.B{UL____
Wa'i considered and the folkl\ving action on the request for: .."X A VARl.1\NCE, [~= A SPECIAL USE PER\lIT. ~~. AN
I\JTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, :: AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: 13;' resolutiDn of the Bo.rd, it was determined that stne! applkation of the Ordinance 0 wcuid = would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question := would = would nO[ yield a reasonable return if limlted to the use permitted t:nder the
Ordinance. because: .
b. The hardship created] is ;-= is nor unique and [] would [J wouid not be shared by aU properties alike in the
vicinity of the pro pert y and in the S,lme use district. because:
c, The variance wouU !~~ would not change the Charac.1e:r of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance Q9 be granted C ~~J:ld.d:~.he.previolls
decision of the Enforcement Officer = -l)tX,:efliH-ffit.~ x: be reversed.
S E"E: A TT ACH~ENT .
2. SPEGAL USE PERMIT: By resolmion of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit = be
granted [J be denied, pursuant to article . section or subsection . paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer r ~ be reversed 'J be confirmed, because:
3. lNTERPRETATlON: The Board adopted [he following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision wa'i made on your appeal:
(fiJ
, .
..........,
.~ '.-"~'~;r.
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
~ -.."', ~. "' , -.,
.. -
Page -2-
At the October 8th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Hirkala that the requested variance be granted.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Caballero.
Vote:
Mr. Lando~fi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Hr. Cortellino - aye
Hr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
"
~l ,I~
__3"'Z"':"",~~/
" j
~ /
v
1/
J ase '?h E. Landolfi, Cbairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Ib
. -.. . -",.',