787
,
~OWN OF WAPPL"'iGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
RE~peal No. 'tt I <;:, .l
DEe I 2 1984Date \ \ - 9 - S l (
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Home Mailing
Address I ~ L/t~':- C1,1, /' d /) ~ A~
"
'.
.1
i
.
I
Appellant MI? Ii f}1 /;' 5. G /1 S /:).412 F S f'1'1 /? /-l C / ,(/ t..)
t(./ I9IY'11t! C t:-/? 5 F;q L L SIL', y,
I
Zip Code: / ~ 5-9 c
Tel. /1'.;2 '? 7-0 9' 6~
TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS:
l{,! ,z ~ I e-
1. (/;.Js.rlJl\~E ~ f};{,' G-=- FL/.} ..) ;)..y/.:"h'ChVtj)appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
J I - 9 - , 19-1l, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 03 A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one). in connection with premises located at ,(,.,. /iC:- ,{"/t' / /J b ZJ ,.A.~
~ (SUM & no.'
'\ - LI b , fa ~ S? - (J 1- .3 t:, if f 0 t:, , Town of Wappinger, N.'l.
(wrung dat.) (gnd no.,
1. PROYISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED /J 11~4 ~ ,~t;;h/ 'I ~ I /~
,
I .1. '../ /1 j( ~ - / , .;! / __- "-._
l/..tr.u-- A1. .::? U,.1.1"}((" ,'11/f4 ,,"~hl ,/'I....', ~L.-J A~-l.-l/tL# -':~1 CrJ-..f.J-l'/{.r# I'f:~f
/ (.il[lcle. :.cctIOO or 5UO~lJ0n,.1m.l paraaraphJ ..
d-/:.( ~u..-~
2. 1YPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:, .
. " /
1) ~t,. ".::'t application of the Zoning qrdinance would p~oduc~ ~ndue har/dship (because: - J{-!1-;1 ("':'7t./ 1!-''!~j
I. vl- - '-1t u' 2.--":"u' 1.:.eL-l . ~ /I f X ~ Y -I't-d/--c:.i...1-<-
2) e hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties ali~e in theimmed.iate vicinity of this property
andinthisd.ist~ctbeca~se: -1(.'~' Ie. (':""'-(-1.';---;"'7 ..A..'~;f .JlA't..& 7t<..(. Jt/ ~.::(.i......:<-c, w
(,Lu.. ICe} A-~>tci..t..- {t.:"'>'1- I~~;t: .A.K...vi.,
3) The varianc~lwo~d o~s~rYe the spirit of,the ~rdinance ~d would not change the character of ~h~ district. " k/ /
because: J,-,.. (,.{..'/-Ul.,:1 -Je...:.-) :Z~-<.., 'L""',:ly t~ .L4..~. C'-.I.:.~<Z...,- ~-f7- ~"'-<- /'-,.....1. .,...~..
~I ....1 ,{ih-d.c/ '-'1(..<'/ ~1<~_i~ ~4r~ .;L~ .~)I J (,}.l.v~~-:.- 1:-'" 7/....:. -:':'<-'-<!"~'<'-t;~).'
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
1
:7 .
SigI1atur~Ji,~,.(JL i,(
/1,
f // ' It
( f. '7 / ~
)
}; -
~ -~.. . .-. "
'<C--f' .7L/ } a:,: ,-::c(..')
/
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 787
Dated December 12th, 1984
Appellant G~op~ro Sp~r~cino
Wappinqer Falls. NY 12590
Address
16 Lake Oniad Drive
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Dec. 11th ,19 84 ,AppealNo. 787
was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE, C A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created [J is [J is not unique and [J would [J would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance L would C would nor change the character of the district, because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance ~ be granted 0 be-denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer C ~~O'nfirmed KJ be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit CJ be
granted [J be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
G...
/' _-....&-1"/
"I '
'..J
.
'.
~
,,~ '..'
· t;::..j.. ;~.:'~~~... 2 ,~?~ ..
ti"
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Appeal #787
-2-
December 12th, 1984
At the December 11th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mrs. Waddle, that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - absent
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
C\~j;;
o ~'
~ ., () .
~. ..~3~>&.C/Igf
Mr. Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
lb