795
~
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEMcEIVED
APR 1 2. 1985
~
jl.)eL-0 Appeal NO.. '1 q S
Date "3/j-j <;- .;-
, /
....
Appellant
DJ"~,-,,/+,:, i.-;:' r.
SNOWOdilome Mailing
'S, l r- (c.' I.., ELAINE H. "Address 3 i 7
l'-1y,L f? S C,'I'2/\n'::''' ~ f?c:".J .
~~e'''il'-i;_/tt7s j:::ni..c. >
/'1'1
I
Zip Code: I 2.. '> - 'J tJ
Tel. #;'}.q? 'L '5 5-7
TO TIIE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, ~ At. ,-.QC.' II F 'S ~-.. 7'1-01,-, , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
/VJ!:)./1.c: d. S- ,19 ".i -')- ,and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~i? {""''Vi':'':? So ('.;o'~'~''':''':> (\~~
..... (street & no.)
) LJ - ..,.,....
"'.- / / " ( :) S:> - ( / - :'1 ',u' ,';. </ t Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(wrung dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
':. '/; . / ,1' I
4ft
-'
, ...
\.~. I
._' f
: " , i
it ) / ~(
! I L;
'"- ". ~ /' ,.
". ' - j . J ~. . . '(
..I. .. or' . <.
+- '?~'. 1"/( " ,/ ,.J
(article:. sc:ction or subsectton and paragraph)
<:;(.' I
I !/.
01;' ( ( I "
/1-- ~: . (. '.- -,,:'(,;:'/'
f..
,~:..l,'t.,// ~') ';. !, t,-- .:, /.. II ~_- /
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: / v-,..... (y '- f) !,,,'c r 13".
1'+6<-IZ, ',<...' ,~....L,.J A^' ~~r-r-"k' H~o G,'i-/V"'(;.IL. 1_:w,C.,q';'c 't'HIL V/.>t.:.qj; C.'i~ 'th~ ,;Y1i.'P",r," 'i
I '
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: IN fQ:i'5' k..,+d.l. TI"fI:; Iir..':..~,~ v""~ i~""'i...r rlfl':' IJ/':,-..:.U ~i?'>"'~'C1'/Q^,,,
.....,.:.t..L ,l(t' <'..... ;:A:;;',.. <.;;..r:>i[ f,--' tJ+lt:' 13c'td"/~i2-y,'::. l'1-1)i i+c..""-:"~ ~/):. LA-Y"':/'J <~,'r- "1I/~ ""..,)'.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: /"l"";'l /-I<'....-;..cs i", rf4/s ;..,2ru,,- 1...1<I'i. h"';.)~r~ 't't/( ~NI..."l OI1./V:J ;::;)d'~f1Z,C'1'O~,'~
- fHICY !-I;j..../i.. r:-/A.':S.'f1/lU (;,H'I,C.li.'-..o ',.<il+,~"" j-NR-,'i1 /i.'",...:.s IIVreil/C (3..,)/..'-.-. .
, t I '
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article t section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REl'VIARKS: l HIt ;-'u.,-",,)t'}l/~:" A,.n :5';"~, ,"t:Tl r-/td (;"'tt:,.,<;,i ,. Ins. I'-A' ~~,IO ';0.-<',( 19~'J ~
J-'J
(Use extra sheets if n~essary)
Signature ?'/LeQ€\,~,? ~g,4.it.;;,
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 7 Q S
Dated Apr;' 11 rh. 1 QR S
Appellant W;:J 11 ;:J r f> F' SlI r rnn
Wappinger Falls, New York
Address 11 7 Mypr~ r.nrnf>T~ RnMi
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ApT; 1 Qrh. .19 !is ,Appeal No. 7QS
was considered and the following action on the request for: IX! A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would D would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance [] be granted 0 be-tl~rrretl and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 b'e-c'OrTfirmed' []. be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit D be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer D be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
.^ ,) "
. 1k :"'~ ....~-. ..
,j#:"L~..~,/;, J (~'. " ::-.." :>r:.'..t d.
1---t d " .~ ,__. //~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
April 11th, 1985
At the April 9th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Cortellino to grant the variance with the condition that the garage
shall be used solely for a garage and storage of garden implements, bicycles, and
things like that, not residential, business, or anything else. Even if there is
a car parked out in the street, there should be a clear at least for the width of
one car to get in there because it is for a garage and not for any other purpose.
The motion was seconded by Mrs. Waddle.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
at time of vote
The motion was carried.
!-~
"'~~'._~~
I"f
! 1 ~
~j~
~ )
-
,/'
v
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb