811
"
J
. ,.
,..
,
1A7 ~ Appeal No. 1S l t
U ~ECEIVED Date c:; I c~ ( , ~ S-
IJUN 14 1985
ELAi'tirNe ~ '
Address /85 ~ P~e'~~ ~.a
Zip Code: /2~O Tel. #; 1(q'74747
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
CC '---0\ ( lr& NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appellant C?4R~ SIA/€/~(../
W4PP/v6€~ F""A-<<: ~ M V
TO TIIE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, L'A.k2~ SWe-AJ.s:::?A:J , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
, 19_ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for; .8 A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN INTERPRETATI.ON OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connectio~ with pre~ located at /t/e.P'V ~rp~
" /' (sueet&.no.)
geO/.4/-:?A &~-05-98'7?E?L:J ,TownofWappinger,N.~
Awnin& dist.) (&rid no,)
J. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED S/Oc: &;/LO//<..;;:;::'
. /.H/:;.'l ,~' .. C> /'7'
CJ~r<SitE/- c:~07~;c. ~~c.//~O ~ / ~Gsrc:z:J ~
i"J /. - (' . larticlc. 5CClion or JlJbscaion and Pflaaraph), '. J J -f k k ,( /.
If~-hc- -e-.J.I.L ~\Qc_f, ~ AJ ~:2. ~ - K"1c.eS"'l''' PI ~ S~d~/q i-d S-~C ~ I' ,*,-,
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).. 5" () ; i r I-.e.t 'U i I- .e d .
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons;
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because; c5 6.l! IJ 7/AClfc'D')
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because;
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
;2tU/~
-
. The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
," -"".""~:. -..~ .-. ~.' '~"" ..,;- ',':" .. .,"".~~.'
'.-.'..:.'_.,....\,.........._ '1',':'" -:r",i','_ -,'
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACfION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. R 11
Dated .Tune 14th, 1 QR'l
Appellant Carl Sw<>nsnn
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Addr~s 185 New Hackensack Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 11th ,19 85 ,AppealNo. 811
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properti~ alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be-gFameGu be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer ex be confirmed 0 -be1'e'r'Cf~.
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
t"\ I "....p ·
\l ~ <il. ~;;:.~
Croon. Zoning Board of Appeals
..
Page -2-
June 14th, 1985
At the June 11th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals a motion was
made by Mr. Cortellino, seconded by Mr. Caballero that the requested variance be
denied on the basis that it is a self-imposed hardship.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
~ I ""- ..
o ,v-v ~ '<:;J~
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb
", ,. .<,0., ",'" ,.~ ."...,:' ''''?''"!'.'\'.J1 i :,,>,.~ ,-'-