825
..0
~~
TO\VN OF ":-\PPI~GER
No-neE OF APPEAL
~
Appeal No. ~ (~ S-
~ rd C"-
Date ~ ~, i \ q l~(:'l
IAUG 2;0 1985
Home~I~~~~1 ~
Address N . 0 $#,,)J. .
Zip Code: I~ S-1:2 Td.#:831-n 3
JI1I'
Appellant ~ A u G. T;; J J
Sr.
TO TIlE nOi\IU) OF APPEALS:
1,_1":; ~ u c;.. -,-;Jd 6 R.. . appeal from a d:,'\,:ision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
-r c.... I y 3 . I9JS-. and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: fitYA VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERrYlIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at "&.IJ~ ~T: C~-e J s ~4.-0-
R '0 -q t::;( \..\ ~,.~ (strcel&no.)
- ,5. ~ - c-J - ,-..~ - . Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(wrung dJ>t.) (gnd no.'
4~1
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant se\..'tion)..
a. A \:-\RJANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict :!pplic:ltion of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district b';.'\:ause: -1";1 e A. e A ~ E A '-~rJt:!J t r.3 J I L'b; 1J ~s l,j T H 1$ ,4 ~ Er1 W H I clo/
":Do NC"- rl40Je ..,-1'/~E.,"flC:i< NOW RE.Q01t:..ED.
3) The variance would observe t)re spirit of the Ordin.:mce and would not chan~e the chara,;:rer of the district
beca ' .-rtf IS POf{.C.H ioJlH)'-l) 13c. fll+~1>l.Y I//s.,e'-~ ~o TIf~ N&"lcHltt:Jo!<.s SI1JC"t: O(.t~
u.,e. I<.:b ;s <':;c:~tE"E,.JEj;J Gt V/1,(/tJdS SHK.(.h3~/ ~HE..J)(fE/ t\Nb fllf/~1-( FENC"E.
r3 ~'5,eY~E/~.tltJo~5. WH('-St: r,eo~~I!,'ES (3of?b€R 61'1 C1l.11f:. f5t9CK:. Loft:. 1/0 NO'i c8.jEcT.
b. A SPECIAL USE PER.\IIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , sC\..'tion or subsection
. paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Sig"a(Ure~~v\ ~. ~I
s~.
· The required plan must accompany the Nocice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING TI-IE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
''''''
........
. '.' .............
~ i".- ....
"lY...", =
. . ,-.
.i ""'W
r7"
--
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
825
Dated. August 19th. 1985
Appellant John G. Todd Sr.
r.helsea, NY 12S12
Address Bank Street
At a meeting of the Zomng Board of AppeaIs on __AIIE1IRt 11th .19 R5 ,Appeal No. 82')
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~X A VARIANCE, :"J A SPECIAL USE PER~lIT, ::J AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. :::J AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of t he Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance L: would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these rea<;on:;:
a. The property in question [~ would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created ._.~ 15"--: is not unique and r-.::: would would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: "
c. The variance [J would ,..::: would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ex be granted .:J ~~and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer == bei:'Onfumcd LX be reversed.
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: Bv resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit C be
granted r.::: be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection _ , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, theretore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer C-= be reversed L_be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
~ ~ ;i'~'~r'
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
-. .
..- .
....
Page -2-
August 19th, 1985
At the August 13th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Caballero to grant a variance for a 10 foot porch. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Hirkala.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - abstained
The motion was carried.
rr ' ~.
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb
AMENDED
ACTION FROM ACTION DATED AUGUST 19TH,
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
1985
QV
0\6
Appeal No.
825
ACTION ON APPEAL
Dated August 22nd,
"ECEWtO
lUg 9. 31985
Address ~anK ~treet
---Uili ~
ELA. J
1985
Appellant John G. Todd Sr.
Chelsea. NY 12512
. . . A' 13th ];LAINE H. ;i,. . 8')5
At a meenng of the Zomng Board ot Appeals on _ ugus t , 19~'T , Appeal No. --=
was considered and the following action on the request for: !~ A VARIANCE, [~J A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, C AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance iJ would fJ would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question C would .~ would nO[ yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance. because:
b. The hardship created ~_ IS .'.-:: is not unique and ~::: would C would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use distnct. because:
c. The variance [J would would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance ex be granted L~ .b@4-RKlQ and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer-=: ~:;Ie1::efltiTmed-t'X be reversed.
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit:::::: be
granted CJ be denied. pursuant to article ___ . section or subsection . paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer :::J be reversed U be confirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
.~
\i I jf."\
0.' ;e.~:'-tt,t.v ...."
-=- II
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
..
.. Amended Action from Action Dated August 19th, 1985.
Page -2-
August 22nd, 1985
At the August 13th, 1985 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
wa made by Mr. Caballero to grant a variance for a 12 x 18 foot porch. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Hirkala.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
dtO#;"1v
,-, ".,0
\:.\, '~::-;:'~i~'l"":~, ~..
::'f-::t~
..
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb
.... .~. ~. 'ii'