849
f~
TO\V~ OF \\:-\PPI:\GEH
r"011CE OF .-\PPEAL
ILuD
Aprt::1l (\;0.
~~ L1el
D.1te ~ ~ pl. lr'
I ..7, , "
...~,
.,
App<U,ml ~rf- u.it;.IlO..--
WMP, ?tt//~ Jl-y..
TO TIlE IH1\RD OF AI'PL\L'):
I, --LD~ur:fl~ (J~ Vtj ?1' "" . Jppt:aJ from a d,-'\:i~ion of t'1:: Zunmg InspC\,'tor, lLlt~d
1/-,/ 7 . 19~. J.n.J Lld h=r~by arr1y to tht= Zuning fhud of .o\PP(::lis fo:-:~ A Vi\RL-\NCE. CJ A
SPECIAL lSEPER~.I!T. '-, t\~ 1~';IE?fJRET.\rIO:'-l OFTIIE ZO~Il\G OItOI1'.'A;--;CE, 0 AN AP~b/ AS AN
AGGRIEVED PER~();'\i(C;) (:h'_'\:k rrop~r on(:). in conm.'l.:tion with rremi~es hxatt...J at _2 oS 1"'17,.).. C!..f
""' ('lr~.el .:;.. 110./
R.2-'L- . __t2J~l~M~~ 9 (0 I ;-0
(wrmg 0,,1/ (..lid 1.01
~~~~~;~tai[jf',~ P ()-'lOy JS~::L_
7ip CoJ-:: _QS-10 Td. #:)!l.~9
_. Town of \VZlppinger. N.Y.
I. PROVI~;IO~(S) OF THE Z'JNI~G ORDINAr--.;C[ APPEALED A~.f .~u2 - _&. 'I ';J. /
~~'t1! a... 'yJ1r:I1IlC~W J1/J IS I St'd1'ulJ-l'!.fl SH-Pl1cX
I 'Ie () I, S r-e g ~/1-tt111"e. t'-IJ' ,'r e:-:J:g(! j40J;)' E' /
2, r{PE OF APPEAL (Com;Jkte rdeval1t se<~lion).. ·
a. A \:-\RIr\:"-iCE r; ;ZEQUES1TD f,)r the folluwing reason<;:
1) Slri1L applicatiun of rhe 7')nin':~ Ordinmce ......ouid produce undue h:1n.:'ihir b,,'G1Clse:
2) TLe brd:sh:r C;:~:.It\:lt i; ucioue :mJ i; not sh:ucd by ::11 propcrt:~ aliJ.,,;: in tlle in:m-::di;lte \i~inity of t!llS pror::rty
anJ in this lktn~~ b.-'::1u',c:
3) Th~ \':lnJ.!lCc.: would ob'iene tl:::: spirit of th:~ Ordin:.lIli.:e:Jr.d ',,,ould llO[ d1J.!1;;e tlie C~l:lrJ.dcr of t::e W"trict
lx"\:au:.e:
b. A SPECIAL USE PER.\IIT IS REQCESTED rursuant to and;: . sC1...'t:on or sub';et..'tion
. p:uagrJ.ph of the Zoning Ordinmce to r~rmitthe following use on the
above premises:
c. L'ITERPRETATIO:"J' of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S):m appeal is requested ba:J.use:
3. OTHER RE;..IARKS:
(Use extra sheers if necessary)
S;gmlurc dJ .a.btfYllb.l) 4, tI? CA-.
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPO~SmLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED I~ PUBUSHlNG THE REQUIRED LEGAL
l\'OTICE I~ THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
.. -"':
'"
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACIlON ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 849
Dated October 8th, 1985
Appellant ---Xfl.L.Y igna
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address P.O. Box 1522
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals OIl October 8th , J9_~_, Appeal No. ~49 __
was considered and ihe following action on the request for: m A ""~IUi\l\rCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMn: 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN AFP!2A L AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: B:i resJlution of the Board, it was determined that striCl applicatierrl :)f the Ordinance 0 would 0 woul:l.
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a rea..1oTI3hk return jf limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
:".. - ...~
b. TIle hardship cleated 0 is 0 is not unique and [J would [] would not be sharc;:d by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same Wi": district, bt'Cause: ______
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
1
'Illerefore, it was fu:lher determined that the requested variarlce IXI be gr.2J1ted 0 BtHknied a.Tld that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer [) be-oonfH-.mOO &1 be r,~versed.
SEE ATTACHHDIT.
2. SPECIAL USE PEHMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or su bsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement 0 ffieer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because;
3. INfERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
~'
j./'V
. . f)
~. ~t:.t.4U .
. /r'
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
.
Page --2.-
At the October 8th, 1985 meeting of he Zoning Board of Appeals, amotion
was made by Mr. Caballero that the reque ed variance be granted.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cart lino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortel
Mr. Birkal
"0 - aye
- nay
The motion was carried.
;',} J' ~ -.:~f.p.~
/-.
i I J
Jos.=ph
Zoning
l\'::rt.: :.,;;~i.~:~J
t
l(/
E. Landolfi, Chairman
Board of Appeals
lb