785
...
-~
TOWN OF 'VAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
R~'~
DEe 1 2 1984
Appeal No. I \ "\
Date ~ (;.J '-t I 19' 9/+
Appellant /" '-f af IA.! i It. :z fl /3 cz !:1 AI SKI
L-J R?PJAlqIiR S f:fJLJ-S
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
~~:~~ailing 8 8 R 0 r )1 /::- /? 5" R D ,
Zip Code: j ~ :;-tj UTe!. #: 29;;-906;
TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, /' t-f 0/ v..n. '4{ Z /1 J3 c.2 ~ A/:,k I _, appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
,IJ.a (/ ~ 1- / ' 19 ~4- . and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INfERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at B B. R, 0 r HCR s i? /)
~ I" 0 _ C <..' ___ H c.. n J J C 0 (street & no.)
. - '/0 V O'~ 6 ,~ l' . I -, \) ~ ,TownofWappinger,N.'Y.
(wrung dist.) (grid no.)
a. A \~RIi\;'~CE IS REQUESITD for the following reasons: De~, e~~ d ;S-ta.Ylc...Q. f~ it" € ~
1) Strict applica. tion.o( the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardsl1,ip because: +:" C(.~'0"" t . G v, I ~
J.;, ~~cV' ,pu\" L CAL~Y'c.L,,~ Iv Lc>n \ ,\~S kCO"",x, b ~ 1" '.:>hr..:.. \' re,-, b:c ,)..)... '='~
... '_JL.J.L'-'\.1/'\, 1: ....t~ ,t
2) The hardship created is uruque and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: 1')2' f\.(),vt? j'\.h::~1(".. R./.'..JIoJ..;?J../\Il _ ,',,,- {.J.tv; €.1'S.-r"J'-.g._. '-(('d-':Iy<
t,I:?C .j.,U. S ~ n. oJ-. 'l.e- hc. ':> ylA.> d."..... , 1\ ~ - ,.'), eU I "-'1 S 1'1 (.. \..v " ':7 r k,v c.t... ~ J J-t,.. ~
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district GJC~'~11
because: it WOu.-lcl ~~U ""~'f hCfYle (VIOr-( lI~o...k,d-tl c~(,(, E'-^,hIXl'lc&
~e f\ €ASh t,cu..o-'" eccL
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Si!lI'ature dvviJ0> It ~'f'1vdl '
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
785
Dated December 12th. 1984
Ludwik Zabczynski
Appellant
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address
8 Brothers Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Dec. 11th ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 785
was considered and the following action on the request for: rn A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, C AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance C would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is C is not unique and C would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance [J would C would nor change the character of the district. because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance D be-grnnted Uk be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer ~ be confirmed [J ~~~a. SEE ATTACHEMNT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit ~ be
granted C be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer D be reversed C be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
! "\; /i
\ .~.tf) (:
/..~ -.
, I
;; t
't ~.
.. '- .- ..... , .~ /~
.~~ .. - -.... .
:t
Chairman. Zoning Board of Appeals
Appeal #785
-2-
December 12th, 1984
At the December 11th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mrs. Waddle, that the requested variance be
denied. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli.
The reasons for the denial were that there was no hardship and
that there are plenty of other alternatives.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - absent
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
0.. .~
(;' ,.--;.-c,. ..J
~ .
I ·
v
Mr. Joseph
..... ~'" ,")
C. ,.',: .1..." ~ .
......v ~"""--"."","::r,.J
f/
E. Landolfi, Chairman
Ib