Loading...
890 .i! TOWN OF \VAPPL~GER NOTICE OF APPEAL ~ RECEIVED Appeal No. ~ C, C! DateJ~)\-~ \ \j'+t \ C(\C. Appellant fY'tQ-4- P1l<~ ~~iC~c..J.. CJ~~-, VS/W" I t0lt~\11Uc; IJUN 1 3 1986 Home Mailing ELAINi.dltr&HDWDEN 5 t-J /lNU1. A ~bt0 ~ Zip Code: r2,~ Tel. #: d97- 1777' TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I, \'1 ic.hQ..~\ ~ cJ +~ ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated p 1?8-L- 11 , 19~ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: (g'" A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERlvlIT; 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at {O~~ t;aL A-(~!f ~ MllW\ PKV~ -.f . ,- . r"" . (street & no.) -J,{) b(~1- 01---C1G'Z1l5"J ,TownofWappinger.N.Y (zoning <list.) (grid no.) 1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~"c..~ -:Irl=- c;lQ/nc~ 4-2.-\ \7) At.uvJ ~~ C~'l-.J~T~</lcn6~ W- A-\)eL-~ W\nt A \-;' ~ ~lVc{~" ~~k.f::. ~~ 'Z<J' lS ~'l (article. section or subsection and paragraph) 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). * a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: 1) Strict applicati~e Zofl,ing.9r:.dinance would nroduce undue hardship b,t;eau$e: ~~~ ~ v'f'Nl-~~. --O-t:o~a...~~\, -.....~~~-"., t., ...R.~ ~) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district because:'-fL-.~ ~ ~ ~ <I'->I,...~ --.Q.l.~~ ~~-lo-+ ~~~I~~.~~-"'-~o....~ ' 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance ~d would not change the character ~f the, district ~ because:.......u...~A-*~~~n ~~{<!>~~ ~. ~~---~~ ~tL...~'"""'U ~ . b. A SPECIAL USE PERIvIIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection ,paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the . above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER RENlARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature ~e~' ~ ' .. ,~c) 7 .. ~ * The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER ACI10N ON APPEAL Appeal No. 890 Dated June 12th, 1986 . Appellant Mr. & Mrs. Michael Caltagirone Address 5 Nancyaleen Drive Wappinger Falls, NY 12590 At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 10th ,19 86 ,Appeal No. 890 was considered and the following action on the request for: rJ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI'f, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: . a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: :-- -, - ..;.. .'.: '. . b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the. vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: - . .~ ,~:. Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance fi be granted 0 .Ge-EleBiOO and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer IX! be confirmed 0 lKHev@l=5OO. SEE ATTACHMENT. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confIrmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: ~//Y~ . Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals .. Page -2- June 10th, 1986 At the June 10th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli to grant the requested variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi. Vote: Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye Mr. Urciuoli - aye Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Hirkala - aye The motion was carried. ~/;V~ Angel Caballero, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA/lb