871
-
twP
TOWN Of '\VAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
~
Appeal No.
M A YJ 2,,3. \1986
ELAINE HI SNOWDEN
Date
~'ll (
I(dol <{c,
c-
6 h Home Mailing",.,
Appellant ~.&'/L '-="Sd~///FS ~ .A#P~~2Z" Address r.o Z
~~a./C// (~/= /' ~y
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, ,.ri?A' k!';::: OY,4 KCJJ<<S' K:'/ , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
~v Z 4 , 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0 A VARIANCE, ~ A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ~ APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at Ac.. ~ dIG. ?b.
(street & no.)
Zip Code: /ZS!3~
~.-r Z~Z
Tel. #:6'1~-7t374
Z:-4cJ
(zoning dist.)
, ~ZS7-CJ2 -8:JcJ8&4
(grid no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
Nip!.
(article. section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PEIU"llT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article 7Jt"" , section or subsection
42/ , paragraph 6" of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises: hcJOO P ~L?/C';t?~ t:J./u/C!.
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS: ,,#~?./~# .5 //.uCZ~ Pe.E;t//77&70 d585.
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
..
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
Dated May 22nd, 1986
871
Appellant Contrail Associates of Wappinger
Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
Address RD 2 - Box 292
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 13th ,19 86 , Appeal No. 871
was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE, IX] A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and that the previ"ous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit []J be
granted 0 ~denied, pursuant to article IV , section or subsection 421 , paragraph 5 of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
SEE ATTACHMENT.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
fh-!jJJ~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
to
.
Page -2-
May 22nd, 1986
At the May 13th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Landolfi to grant the Special Use Permit with the following conditions:
1. The signage shall conform with the requirements of the Town of Wappinger
Zoning Ordinance.
2. There shall be no mixing of professions.
3. The refuse container shall be contained in an enclosed and secured structure.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
~//J~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb
cc: Planning Board