860 .... ...-. .'1'" .. < ~ TOWN OF WAPPINGER r-{\ i IA') Appeal No. 9 Ie tJ _ ~ 1 ~ . RElc~ED- 'I /, ~ /,.,./ o \. ().r NOTICE OF APPEAL Date~ (Y(!J - '-- MAR 20 1986 . ~-3-~-F'~ 01 ElAINE H'IHM~u 0_\ APpeUant~ ~'(ffi) H \ \. \::; DO ZQ Address -'-----'-r~rs Corracs NA-'-. \.A:::aW\~Cl'x--tn\\s) ~)Y , a{.. ZipCode:J~'")q() ~:~~\~ TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS: Lo - Le \ . ( 'd-'2r I, ~ Uo -:d~ ,appeal from a decision of the Zonioi'inspector, dated . ,19 , and do hereby apply to the Zoning,Board of Appeals for: 'fi: A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI'T, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDIN~CE, 0 AN APPAAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located a~('(l'"n:>\\\\ \c::; t1l1?O ~GlrC:; (t"'I"'l"\ Q 7 ~ J (street & no.) / Rd. "'-) 1..) , - - III D , Town of Wappinger, N. ~ (zoning dist.) (grid no.) c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER REMARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) ยท The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL .~ NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. "" -;. . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER . \, ACI10N ON APPEAL Appeal No. 860 - Dated March 14 t:h. 1986 'Appellant DeGarmo Hills Plaza - Trudy Minotti Wappinger Falls. NY 12590 AddresS Myers Corners Road At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 11th ,1986 ,AppealNo. 860 was considered and the following action on the request for: Kl A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT; 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was mk~: ' ., 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was deterniined that strict a.pplication of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: . a. The property in question 6- would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted' under th~ Ordinance, because: ,.-:. -..;.' ~ ~, . ~ ..~ b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the. vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: . ~ r....~.,. ,."'::. Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance rn be granted 0 be denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 ~fH:meQ lXI be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be conIrrmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning . Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: ChJi:ft~~ . J- " Page -2- March 14th, 1986 At the March 11th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi to grant the requested variance because it would enhance the area by allowing it in this particular case because of the terrain of the land on Myers Corners Road. Mr. Cortellino seconded the motion. Vote: Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye Mr. Urciuoli - aye --- Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Hirkala - aye ~//V~ Angel Caballero, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals lb