862
....
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER 0 ( C
NOTICE OF APPEAL RECEIVED
Appeal No. ~ 0 rl..
Date Id-I a J 's s-
to'
!JAN 2,3 1986
f)o/1J;UEL.~NEH'.ef~ KEtti; f?D
Zip Code: / J-!) f () Tel. #:
Appellant H Ie /I fJ G i
h/.~f'I'. F~LC5~
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
.
I. Jt( / r'- II (J E L Do /J /J E l. [, , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
I / --I S- , 19-&5: and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: rll-1< VARIANCE, _
Sk,-~3lh .QJ 'IT~ INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, [zj..J~c;~d-I'~ ~
~ LoU rliWcSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 2--:2.-- k-'E/VT /pf)
(sueet & no.)
R -"Lo b~ r->J - 0'3 - d Sf, () tf s> , Town of Wappinger, N.'l
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
ttRT IV
.
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following re;lSons:
/ 1) Strict application of the Zoni.ng Ordimulce would produce undue hardship because:
t/ 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the inunediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
V' 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: 1../J Iii
,
d. AG<;{RIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 8 V) 1- () I Iii ~
W)'4> f)fN lelJ Fo~ poo L t}- "/) E C k.
3. OTHER REMARKS:
I 5' u JJ C L E IJ I(
J
pelt< M II
(U se extra sheets if necessary)
Signature f\JvUALiW12\~~
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
..,.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 862
Dated January 21st, 1986
Appellant M;('n::H,1 nnnnpll
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address 22 Kent Road
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on January 14th , 19 86 ,Appeal No. 862
was considered and the following action on the request for: []: A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance [J would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is [J is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance i9 be granted 0 eetieflie6 and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer [J ~~eefio~ffRed [X be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit [J be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
-
Page -2-
January 21st, 1986
At the January 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion
was made by Mr. Hirkala to authorize the Building Inspector to issue a building
permit upon his satisfaction on inspection. Once he is satisfied, he may then
issue a Certificate of Occupancy.
Mrs. Waddle seconded the motion.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
lero, Chairman
rd of Appeals
lb