894
Th-u-J
~c
Appeal No. / 'j Lf
Date 4 / ) J- / <i (
/ I
~
TOWN OF \VAPPL'lGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appellant
4//CA-1 J~
;/o/htt<
F ivt VI
j//, V; ..
v
RECEIVED
JUN 5 :1986
ELAINE H. SNO{,DEN.
Home I liiiling ULI<- P/J
Address 7 - /\1<. /
Zip Code: J;; ~ ~ )
Tel. #: ~ 79' - 1t.;~ J-
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, 41/~....... T. (-/VlI'I , appeal from a decision of the Zonin~ Inspector, dated
~/))- , 19-.li, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: g A VARIANCE, ~A
SPECIAL USE PERMI'r, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection .with premises located at P /It~ /I/d ~t. /J r. .\~...Dt--'" 5
g l; - . . (SO' [&no.)
- 40 " d 'S.lL. - 0 do - ~ c' DS G." c~-. TO\yn of Wappinger, N.r:
(zoning dist.) (grid no.) ..
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~
;(. -\-0 6\A ~
~ ~ -b e.. 411' c.. ~e. sect~bseclion and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL ~omplete relevant section). *
S'er~ 425,' T6 ~\ldW
1,~^^ k\
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
,- 1) -.Strict apj2lication of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: t. .,1ff1Z..1A,dJ sf~ Lk J'j;'<.
.. f!.i:rnA~ ~ flh,~ R/cR.~ ;~ c1~~r~<. ~ ~4.('~a.~ ; 4ko /Jr<}f.../~ W",J'Ii. s<hi <'i'~)~
lY Thehardship created is unique an,? i~ n~t shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this pro~rty .
and in. this district because: If "J a /!; /11 >r. ~.,o fJ u f J A...( (1 a ~-<.. 'i c_<-~.! S fo ~re..~-f 10<'(.,,)
(:;~ J.,) c.lt I-<-~ fA. /Is ;~ t:... I- J~ -;. g ~ (e. .-Q'r/~ l./".l,;~
o The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not Change the character of the district
because: ::L t Iv 0 "- y. CT1, /) .4A,j,fh" t..<.. -I '-<- 'Y' / .(..4,... ~ .:.t.. ~ c../I;o t" 7' ~ -Ih ~
~c~;uJ2. ,
b. A SPECIAL USE PER.l\1IT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph ofthe Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the .
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER RENlARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
1?1R,~/~
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
894
Dated June 4th, 1986
Appellant Allan J. Finn
Holmes, NY 12531
Address 445 RR 1
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 11th ,19 86 , Appeal No. 894
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitteu under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be-granted 0 be denied and that the prev{ous
decision of the Enforcement Officer !if] be confirmed 0 ge.~.
SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation ofthe Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
. th-I;V~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
..
~
Page -2-
June 4th, 1986
At the May 13th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Landolfi to deny the requested variance. The appellant did not show
or demonstrate any hardship.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
~/~J~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
ZBA/lb