864
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
(V NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appellant f..( l. A ~ 5! j)
('-sh kilL
~ui Ic[-t",.s 'Tnt..,.
'~C~IW Appeal No. Y;G If_
J A ~ Y3 198fPate ( r '7 I cr~ '-
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Home Mailing -/
Address ., E E2.. ~
Zip Code: It J-l <<./
)8 L --l fT1
Tel. #: i'1' .. 9tJ7?
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, k'LAS';"W ";U '-IJ"l ,.., :r n~ ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
'Y I? ' 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: urA VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI1: 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANC2, 0 H.J ~PEAL AS.4N
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~c. ueJf' ..D.. ·
R 'I ' ':'\ c-. I S il '- (street & no.)
- 0 ,(rU 2> ~ . C~ - - '),d I " ,TownofWappinget N.Y.
(zoning dist.) 1- fJ-r 13 }Jf1;~ llllAJ '.
1. PROVISION(S)OFTHEZONINGORDINANCEAPPEALED~~U . s~c...f,o~ L/d.-I
I I / () ~ d' 5 ,.'~ (J. rl ~+ /'0. l.. ~ ~ I 't!.. ~ ~' J S.
~oI2..IJ It;". t(l.J J #J - YO ~~e.~ect~orsubsectionand paragraph)
2. TYPE 6F APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
~
. The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
· SigDature ~ ~
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
. ,!,:
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
RECEIVED A al N 864
ppe o.
JAN 2,3 1986Dated January 21st, 1986
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant Klassen Builders rne.
Fishkill, NY 12524
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on January 14th, , 19 86 ,Appeal No. 864
was considered and the following action on the request for: rn A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
Address 3 East Salem Road
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance XX be granted 0 ee4eRi€d and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 ee-eeRkffftee rn be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
Page -2-
January 21st, 1986
At the January 14th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mrs. Waddle to grant the requested 3 foot variance. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
The motion was carried.
Arig Calero, Chairman
Zo ing Board of Appeals
lb