885
---
_ ~::.1 '>
Lt
Appellant ~ \ \~ <Z \ Y ,~
(,::J ?)I'?}-~I fly (l rs.
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
o TOWN OF 'VAPPL.~GER
11 19861 NOTICE OF APPEAL
r
Appeal No. q ~ \
Date N 6AC____~i C), IS q G
. I
.",
! ' t./
~)'
'(y\ A r rY) r+-
I--;t 11.5
Home Mailing n /
Address L eo (.J.,.-
Zip Code: /A.39 U
1-11/ )"
TeL #891- Y/ (. c/
I, ' appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
~M.t..-t-\ \8 , 191!k-, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located az..+ ~ t\1. u.... ~\)
~-40 6"25(0 - Ol- 3q~t-3 '. TownofwapPinger:s~~~no.)
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~Gte1::1j:. ~~~ 445.e
1Q ~ ~ 'AW\A~ ~-A0 ~Cf.>1 ~Ji~\ ~ ~~\t.i; L-AW ~
1t SiAOc\ ffi~~ v.\Lt.g,; lu (~C~~sec=~P~1l!uau?€ ~ ~ ~lV\~~S~
2. 1YPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: ~(r . It-
.sIze anJ f.-.eq'/oliT' 0..[ hoc)s~ wou t. Mt+-k-e tl -PITJICV'
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: ~ f.\-N\ ~ l f nee J..s ~ 1<: +- ~ Te.- ~ e<: eo S $ Q r 1 Q PV-
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district /
because: .f\e~ e<f=:,So r"y .. Apt s. ~ r e.. ~~ r (ir) CrT ed ~ '1 Sf e e, 4
U $ e ~-e rvY\ \'1 \ n. r'^ '\. "Zon 'C..._
b. A SPECIAL USE PER.J\1IT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
. paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REl\tlARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature eLf J -rd--
~ /
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
~
'1
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 885
Dated April 11th, 1986
'Appellant Albert J. Marma
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address
Cedar Hill Road
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 . would not change the character of the district, because:
,-.... :.":';;;',' . ~','
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be-~ tiEl be denied and that the previous ,
decision of the Enforcement Officer IX] be confirmed 0 b8-~. 'SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confIrmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION:, The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
. Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
'~."'.'."'..~~,~~".~".'.'~'-".u""~"""'~" . .
- . . .'.~'" -'- "
~ ':
, . , .
. - ,:", - . .
! ,- '-...... '.
Chairman. Zoning Board of Appeals
Page -2-
April 11th, 1986
At the April 8th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Landolfi to deny the requested variance because no particular hardship
was demonstrated. Something should be done within the confines of the existing
house or adjacent as opposed to an accessory apartment.
Mr. Cortellino seconded the motion.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
1htt!{~'
Ang~J~~~B~~lero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb